Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On 9/29/2017 9:59 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: On 9/29/2017 8:31 PM, Max Erickson wrote: Yeah, a Google search for "Mill Creek Church nashville" has http://freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nashvillearchives/millcreek.html as an early result. It says the church building has been

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

There's a fair chance that a GNIS location is off by a couple miles. A little bit more information from GNIS is available by putting the ID into https://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/ It lists "Mill Creek Baptist Church" as a variant name. From time to time I come across a GNIS entry that is

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mark Bradley wrote: > > In the course of my mapping in the American Midwest, I have come across > several small country churches of GNIS origin that no longer exist. Often > there will be a nearby cemetery, but the church facility is

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Ed Hillsman wrote: > In my mapping in Albuquerque, I have come across a number of GNIS nodes > tagged as churches or schools, in built-up areas, that I am unable to find > on the ground anywhere near the coordinates. I’ve researched a few of

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

On 9/29/2017 8:31 PM, Max Erickson wrote: Yeah, a Google search for "Mill Creek Church nashville" has http://freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nashvillearchives/millcreek.html as an early result. It says the church building has been dismantled but mentions a cemetery, which still exists

[talk-ph] About user "MembersOnly"

This new user has been making many edits on the past days, but I notice something strange with this one. This user is adding false data to the map, and this looks like it is connected to "bryanpiczon", because of the style of comments. We should monitor that user's edits and revert additions of

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:26:49 -0500 > From: "John F. Eldredge" > To: OpenStreetMap Talk-US Mailing List > Subject: [Talk-us] dubious church node > Message-ID: > Content-Type:

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

Yeah, a Google search for "Mill Creek Church nashville" has http://freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nashvillearchives/millcreek.html as an early result. It says the church building has been dismantled but mentions a cemetery, which still exists nearby the mislocated osm node:

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

In my mapping in Albuquerque, I have come across a number of GNIS nodes tagged as churches or schools, in built-up areas, that I am unable to find on the ground anywhere near the coordinates. I’ve researched a few of them and found that they did exist at one time or another but have been

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

Glad you mentioned that GNIS import, Ian. This isn't a pressing issue but I've been doing considerable mapping in Alaska and encounter GNIS features constantly. Many of them are nodes and refer to mines, usually abandoned mines, and contain tagging that JOSM complains about, for example, using

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

If you are interested in cleaning up some of the GNIS imported features in a more structured manner, we can create a MapRoulette challenge. In fact, there is one already that we can model more of them after. Give it a try: http://maproulette.org/map/2774

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

The history of the node shows that I created it 8 years ago: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/356845407/history The gnis tags indicate that it probably came in from my (somewhat misguided) GNIS import back then. If there's no recent information to corroborate the node then feel free to delete

[Talk-us] dubious church node

OSM Item 356845407 is a node supposedly marking the location of a church named "Mill Creek Church", at coordinates 36.0972810, -86.7027754 . The node history shows two changesets making edits to the node, but no changeset for the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

On 2017-09-29 22:46, eMerzh wrote: > just another example a little more cycleway... > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=GnblTsSKolUsjQ6URC0zyg=photo=50.86767032=4.3280441=17=0.510308202857=0.4999=0 > > but still for me the delimitations are not really clear ... and > calling that

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

> Maurizio, mi spiace di essere stato brusco ma è dovuto a una mia mancanza di > tempo. Tu dici che Daniele è fermo al punto 2 delle guidelines. Bene, ma > dalla sua prima mail sembrava poco prima del punto 6. Capisco il tuo punto di vista. Più che altro quel "lunedi procedo" ha spaventato un po'

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Centre commercial déplacé

Le 29/09/2017 à 22:44, Lionel Allorge a écrit : > > Oui c'est bien cela. > Ok. Du coup, le plus simple est d'utiliser les imageries Cadastre pour les bâtiments et BDOrtho IGN pour le reste visible du ciel. C'est ce que je viens de faire (j'avais trop envie, c'est une vraie drogue ce projet !).

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

It's not only in Brussels that they had leftover paint. Maybe it would have been better if they had drawn some flowers... They are indeed meaningless as far as traffic rules go. I guess they only mean something to the politicians who decided to draw them. Polyglot 2017-09-29 22:56 GMT+02:00

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GeoCodage et uMap

Le 29/09/2017 à 23:24, Christian Quest a écrit : > Si tu as juste le nom de l'établissement et la commune, c'est chaud... > pas de code UAI d'établissement (il est dans l'adresse email générique > des établissements) ? Si, je peux l'avoir effectivement, j'ai vu qu'il était dans les tags des

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] [Talk-it] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 23:00, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote: > > Il drinking_water:type= che hai proposto secondo me non è l'ideale perché > potrebbe anche indicare il tipo di acqua. Naturale o frizzante? :) si, è vero, sarebbe un’altra interpretazione.

Re: [Talk-it] [Talk-it-lazio] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 23:00, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote: > > Il drinking_water:type= che hai proposto secondo me non è l'ideale perché > potrebbe anche indicare il tipo di acqua. Naturale o frizzante? :) si, è vero, sarebbe un’altra interpretazione.

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 22:42, Daniele Zotta wrote: > > Scusate se rispondo solo ora, ma come da indicazione ecco la pagina in Inglese > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trentino/Import_housenumbers_Trento bene, potresti anche linkare i dati

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GeoCodage et uMap

Si tu as juste le nom de l'établissement et la commune, c'est chaud... pas de code UAI d'établissement (il est dans l'adresse email générique des établissements) ? -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Les différentes provinces ou états ont souvent un organisme responsable de faire l'inventaire des noms officiels. Au Québec,  c'est la Commission de toponymie qui est responsable.http://www.toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/accueil.aspx Sur leur site, on retrouve des listes de noms et les règles qui

[Talk-ca] Brève analyse, Statistiques des contributeurs OSM

Dans la chronique [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative, John Whelan faisait mention ce matin de mon analyse twitter des contributeurs OSM. Tout cela en 140 caractères! voir https://twitter.com/pascal_n/status/893573996364673024 Ce ne sont là que des données préliminaires. Je suis à

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

OSMand will show street names in Ottawa in either English or French as will Maperitive but I don't recall seeing destination:street=Rue Regent Cheerio John On 29 Sep 2017 4:23 pm, "James" wrote: Also do cosumers use destination:street:[lang code]? Is it a standard or just

Re: [Talk-it] [Talk-it-lazio] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

Il giorno ven, 29/09/2017 alle 21.45 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > questo sarebbe un rubinetto, i nasoni per la stragrande maggioranza > non hanno rubinetti Mmm, che follia :) Credo che se lo mapperei comunque come water_tap anche se il comando non è accessibile. Il

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

Ah, Brussels where they think that painting cycles randomly in streets and on sidewalks results in cycling infrastructure. It is very simply. The meaning of those painted cycles is the same as when they would have painted flowers or hearts or something; none whatsoever. It doesn't mean anything.

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Whilst I think about it Ottawa is an amalgam of smaller municipalities so is slowly changing street names to avoid duplicates. I seem to recall an employee in the street naming bit is adjusting street names in OSM. So please do not change a street name to match a photo that might have been taken

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

just another example a little more cycleway... https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=GnblTsSKolUsjQ6URC0zyg=photo=50.86767032=4.3280441=17=0.510308202857=0.4999=0 but still for me the delimitations are not really clear ... and calling that a cycleway seems. unfair :p 2017-09-29

[OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

hi, i stumble upon some streets that have small cycles drawn on the street now and then, and often there are small dashed line at the start or the end of the street, but tagging those as cycleway seems a bit weird as there are no clear delimitations... How to you tag thoses? An example :

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Scusate se rispondo solo ora, ma come da indicazione ecco la pagina in Inglese https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trentino/Import_housenumbers_Trento Il giorno 29 settembre 2017 17:23, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > 2017-09-29 17:08 GMT+02:00 Maurizio Napolitano

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Also do cosumers use destination:street:[lang code]? Is it a standard or just invented? That seems to be in the Montreal area(guessing) so i'd put destination:street=Rue Regent destination:street:en=Regent Street just like street names. Name=default language and then you can addon name:fr or

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Ottawa is one of the few places that has bilingual street names. On the same street I've seen just the name, name street and rue name street signs. In Ottawa the majority are Slater street in name then rue Slater in name:french. Anything else means it is difficult to search for the name

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Centre commercial déplacé

Hello, Le 29/09/2017 à 09:35, Lionel Allorge a écrit : > Bonjour, > > J'ai constaté qu'un centre commercial à Rambouillet avait été changé de > place, le nouveau bâtiment du Leclerc étant reconstruit à côté de > l'ancien et les parkings modifiés; mais OSM n'est pas à jour comme on > peut le voir

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Rue Regent St is incorrect. Rue Regent is french and Regent Street would be English. Just the fact that Street is shorten to St is wrong as osm fully expands names On Sep 29, 2017 4:10 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote: > Hi all, > > How do you map bilingual signposts? Ones that say

[Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Hi all, How do you map bilingual signposts? Ones that say for example 'Rue Regent St'? My thought would be destination:street=[name in primary language for the province] and destination:street:en / destination:street:fr for the name in the other language. But I've also seen just

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GeoCodage et uMap

Le 29/09/2017 à 21:32, Christian Quest a écrit : > Le 29 septembre 2017 à 18:19, Cédric Frayssinet > a écrit : > > Merci de ta réponse Nicolas. Quelques réponses ci-dessous > > Le 29/09/2017 à 17:45, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit : >> >>

Re: [Talk-it] [Talk-it-lazio] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 19:58, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote: > > Non sarebbe meglio usare man_made=water_tap oppure disused:man_made=water_tap > ? questo sarebbe un rubinetto, i nasoni per la stragrande maggioranza non hanno rubinetti

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] [Talk-it] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 19:58, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote: > > Non sarebbe meglio usare man_made=water_tap oppure disused:man_made=water_tap > ? questo sarebbe un rubinetto, i nasoni per la stragrande maggioranza non hanno rubinetti

Re: [Talk-it] Task incompleto, da me bloccato.

Il 29/09/2017 19:35, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: Oltre a dare un input alla questione mia, riporto che il server è in "502 Bad Gateway", penso sia caduto il server (caduto in senso di spento, non voglio pensar male..) ? Casomai date una

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GeoCodage et uMap

Le 29 septembre 2017 à 18:19, Cédric Frayssinet a écrit : > Merci de ta réponse Nicolas. Quelques réponses ci-dessous > > Le 29/09/2017 à 17:45, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit : > > Le géocodeur national permettra de gécoder selon les communes : > > Euh... pas que "selon les

Re: [Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map alignments and paths actually walked

I apologise to everyone for making a mess of this thread’s title and replying twice with the same content. I shall give myself one hundred lines (for those who remember the punishment)! --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: [Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map

It is fortunate for me that Oxfordshire County Council makes its Public Rights of Way shown in its Countryside Access Map downloadable. I have been able to load data in .kml format by civil parish to my ‘phone as an overlay to OSM and follow the paths, track recording as I walk. This allows

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

On 29/09/2017 19:40, Philip Barnes wrote: Each needs a case by case survey, any can be motor_vehicle=private or destination. I don't think that's what http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Table is trying to say - it's saying "there are no motor vehicle rights granted by the

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

J'étais au SOTM France en juin. On voit là une organisation forte, très développée avec des membres très engagés dans les différentes régions de France. Ils ont développé des collaborations avec les autorités locales, ils ont des serveurs, offrent différents services tels Osmose, tuiles pour le

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 18:59 +0100, Bob Hawkins wrote: > > Jerry > I thank you for your helpful reply. > One of my difficulties with Restricted Byways is the use of > motor_vehicle=no as shown in Robert Whittaker’s table, http://wiki.op > enstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Table. > I use

Re: [Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map

It is fortunate for me that Oxfordshire County Council makes its Public Rights of Way shown in its Countryside Access Map downloadable. I have been able to load data in .kml format by civil parish to my ‘phone as an overlay to OSM and follow the paths, track recording as I walk. This allows

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

Jerry I thank you for your helpful reply. One of my difficulties with Restricted Byways is the use of motor_vehicle=no as shown in Robert Whittaker’s table, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Table. I use vehicle=yes in almost all cases, but there are properties on Restricted

Re: [Talk-it] [Talk-it-lazio] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

drinking_water=yes/no è più una proprietà per indicare se c'è acqua potabile o meno. Non mi sembra tanto adatto per applicargli un :type. Non sarebbe meglio usare man_made=water_tap oppure disused:man_made=water_tap ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap

Re: [Talk-it] Task incompleto, da me bloccato.

Il 29/09/2017 19:32, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT net ha scritto: > Il 27/09/2017 22:37, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: > Si tratta del tasking al seguente indirizzo: > > http://osmit-tm.wmflabs.org/project/26 > > Siccome ho dovuto lasciare il lavoro incompleto per allontanarmi

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GeoCodage et uMap

Merci de ta réponse Nicolas. Quelques réponses ci-dessous Le 29/09/2017 à 17:45, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit : > > Le géocodeur national permettra de gécoder selon les communes : > > https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/csv > L'interface est très réussie et fonctionnelle, mais visiblement, il n'aime pas

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

Is there anyone on point to drive this activity? On 2017-09-28 06:58 AM, john whelan wrote: Looks like we need to talk nicely to Open-Ouvert. Thanks John On 27 September 2017 at 21:54, Stewart C. Russell > wrote: On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

One simple rule of thumb: if the postman & delivery drivers go that way it's =destination not =private. "Private" roads, better called unadopted roads often get mapped with access=private in the first instance. This is better reserved for places where access is clearly limited by a gate or other

Re: [Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map alignments and paths actually walked

What I have done in such situations is: - Remove designation tags from the actually used paths. Access with foot=yes is - Add the formal line of the path with the designation tag and access tags, but without highway tags. Specific examples I've mapped in the past couple of years:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] les dates de terrain, de test fonctionnel, d'import, de source

Bonjour, Vu que l'inventaire semble complet,je propose de fusionner : source_date et date:source en faveur du tag majoritaire source:date date:survey en faveur du tag majoritaire survey:date ok ? objection ? Cordialement, Marc Le 12. 09. 17 à 14:01, Marc M. a écrit : > @tous : il ne manque

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

David I should have made it clearer: the two signs of which I wrote are one above the other at the start of the one Restricted Byway – that, perhaps, is the complication. Bob --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: [OSM-talk] Osmose-QA - Mapillary traffic signs matching

Hello, You can upload what you see in Mapillary photos. The tools use traffic signs extracted by Mapillary and only point out where it seams there is something missing. Yes, we may plan to suggest adding traffic signs as well in addition of traffic signs effects. The future and the

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

2017-09-29 17:08 GMT+02:00 Maurizio Napolitano : > > Lunedì??? > > > > Ciao > ho già commentato la questione > Dal mio punto di vista non c'è problema ad attendere > > Mi sembra manchino diversi passaggi descritti qui: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines >

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 16:13, Daniele Zotta wrote: > > Nei casi complicati sono andato sul posto (= ho fatto rilievi) ottimo, la verifica in loco è uno dei principi più importanti in OSM. Ciao, Martin ___

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

certamente, chiedo scusa se non ho trovato i toni giusti, e spero che non abbia influito sul suo entusiasmo. Sono contentissimo se il numero di civici presente in OSM aumenta, ma volevo togliermi dei dubbi su alcune domande (purtroppo abbiamo già visto troppi import andati male, anche se

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Lunedì??? Ciao ho già commentato la questione Dal mio punto di vista non c'è problema ad attendere Mi sembra manchino diversi passaggi descritti qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines A me invece sembra che stia seguendo i passaggi, tant'è che è fermo al punto due. Qui ha

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 16:45, Maurizio Napolitano wrote: > > Ci tengo però a sottolineare che il ragazzo è appena arrivato nel nostro > mondo ed ha cominciato a tuffarsi con entusiasmo. certamente, chiedo scusa se non ho trovato i toni giusti, e spero

Re: [Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map alignments and paths actually walked

W On 29 September 2017 at 14:35, Bob Hawkins wrote: > I should be interested to learn the general consensus regarding definitive > alignments of Public Rights of Way and paths actually walked, and whether > contributors have similar predicaments to mine. I have two

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Capito. Non avrebbero dovuto adeguare la numerazione alle regole ISTAT? Sono dati pre-regolamento ISTAT? Il Comune di Trento gestisce i civici in maniera quotidiana dal oltre 10 anni. È il metodo che è pre-ISTAT e non il dataset Immagino che presto si adegueranno O non dovevano farlo per

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Ciao a tutt* Chiedo scusa se rispondo solo ora ma ero in trasferta Daniele ha iniziato il suo stage da me con il discorso dell'alternanza scuola lavoro prevista dal MIUR Gli ho fatto varie proposte e quella che lo ha affascinato è stata quella del confronto fra i dati del Comune di Trento e quelli

Re: [Talk-it] Domanda da nuovo arrivato!

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 16:34, Andrea Albani wrote: > > Devi quindi assumere che, in assenza del valore dell'ultimo campo, il nodo è > riferito ad una fermata bus. forse si deve guardare anche il tag public_transport e relativi sottotag? Ciao, Martin

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 14:59, Daniele Zotta wrote: > > Nel dataset del comune sono mappati anche gli ingressi secondari ad un > edificio, ma presentano sempre lo stesso civico dell'ingresso principale. > Quindi inserendo anche gli ingressi

Re: [Talk-it] Domanda da nuovo arrivato!

> > e cioe’ nell’output csv vorrei avere > > 23445667, il nome del nodo, 44.233455,11.2345667, bus_stop > 23445667, il nome del nodo, 44.233455,11.2345667, halt > 23445667, il nome del nodo, 44.233455,11.2345667, station > > Mi sono scervellato un po' con le query overpass fra variabili, cicli for

[Talk-ht] Fwd: J-7

Bonjour, Pour information un Mooc qui pourrait avoir des éléments intéressants... En 2015, on avait essayé de proposer des analyses rapides sur les bassins versants en Haïti pour pauser un diagnostique participatif... Mais on n'a pas pu aller au bout de la démarche, faute de moyen... Cela

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

> > >- >- i numeri civici complicati da interpretare sono stati gestiti e >modificati manualmente e fisicamente > > anche questo non capisco. Hai fatto rilievi? Cosa hai fatto nel particolare? - manualmente sono andato a verificare cosa scritto nei dati OpenStreeMap ed ho trovato

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

Another good reason to create an organization that holds the keys to key OSM resources... then it can out-survive all of us. :-) On 2017-09-29 09:41 AM, James wrote: I and others can give access to people to create projects on the tasking manager. I understand that one person might disapear,

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

I and others can give access to people to create projects on the tasking manager. I understand that one person might disapear, i'll try not to die in the next 2 years ;) On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:37 AM, john whelan wrote: > But that is only a single person for a project

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

But that is only a single person for a project of this size you need some sort of team approach. Although buses are fairly safe the odd one gets hit by a train and if you happen to be sitting in the front seat you may not be available to sort things out. Cheerio John On 29 September 2017 at

[Talk-GB] Portraying and labelling Countryside Access Map alignments and paths actually walked

I should be interested to learn the general consensus regarding definitive alignments of Public Rights of Way and paths actually walked, and whether contributors have similar predicaments to mine. I have two cases in Shiplake, Oxfordshire: 1. Shiplake FP 37 Footpath #528052488 Changeset

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

To answer you question about who would organise the tasking manager, I'm willing to do so. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:24 AM, john whelan wrote: > A couple of comments: > > 1. Pierre Beland has identified > 95% of contributors only

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

Ciao, volentieri! In che data? L From: FelynX Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:51 PM To: talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-) Ciao, bentrovati. Mi ero iscritto

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

A couple of comments: 1. Pierre Beland has identified 95% of contributors only map 6% of the assets. https://mobile.twitter.com/pierzen/status/910551645498552321 We would need to use those 5% of mappers who do the most mapping and they have their own

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 14:06 +0100, David Woolley wrote: > On 29/09/17 13:56, Bob Hawkins wrote: > > > In the absence of the image, the two signs read as follows: 1. In > > white > > on blue: Oxfordshire County Council/No vehicles beyond this point > > except > > for access. > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

On 29/09/2017 14:06, David Woolley wrote: 2. In white on green: RESTRICTED BYWAY/PRIVATE ROAD/NO vehicle access except for residents.  I should appreciate views on the motor_vehicle=private Does the sign really mean "no vehicle access" or "no motor vehicle access"? As I

Re: [Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

On 29/09/17 13:56, Bob Hawkins wrote: In the absence of the image, the two signs read as follows: 1. In white on blue: Oxfordshire County Council/No vehicles beyond this point except for access. motor_vehicle=destination 2. In white on green: RESTRICTED BYWAY/PRIVATE ROAD/NO

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

Perché non discutere di design del sito nella sede appropriata, anziché qui in lista? La ricerca della mailing list appropriata è lasciata al lettore come esercizio. Saluti Il 29/Set/2017 14:54, "Alessandro Palmas" ha scritto: > Il 29/09/2017 12:29, Marco

[Talk-GB] Access and other tags for a particular Restricted Byway

I wished to attach an image of road signs in Shiplake, Oxfordshire, but was informed the file was too large. In the absence of the image, the two signs read as follows: 1. In white on blue: Oxfordshire County Council/No vehicles beyond this point except for access. 2. In white on green:

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

Il 29/09/2017 12:29, Marco Ciampa ha scritto: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:09AM +0200, Lorenzo "Beba" Beltrami wrote: ... Domande aperte: Come si fa a rendere accattivante un database rispettando la sua identità? C'è qualcuno che si occupa di

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 14:39 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > questo è un'elaborazione, bisognerebbe capire come hanno fatta la delibera, > ma dalla pagina linkata non vedo problemi nel individuare un'area per la > ZTL. > Non ci sono problemi ad individuare l'area che racchiude

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

On 28/09/2017 07:15, Stefano wrote: We used this library to process the dump and then we add the results in pgsql https://www.entropywins.wtf/blog/2015/11/08/wikidata-wikibase-json-dump-reader/ https://github.com/osmItalia/wikidata-geo-match What would the requirement of a wikidata2pgsql

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 13:36 GMT+02:00 Federico Cortese : > 2017-09-29 13:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > > hai un link alla delibera? > > Non ce l'ho, ma sul portale opendata le ZTL del centro storico sono > ben visibili: >

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 13:46 GMT+02:00 Federico Cortese : > 2017-09-29 13:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > > Nel tuo esempio potrei andare in Via Idomeneo anche di notte in > macchina, ma > > non posso uscire? > > No, di notte non puoi entrare nel centro

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

sent from a phone > On 29. Sep 2017, at 13:48, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > È una funzione di ricerca? UNA LENTE!!! (era difficile vero? :-) la lente già c’è, è per la ricerca testuale, mentre il punto interrogativo è per interrogare la mappa. Anche alcuni programmi lo usano

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2017-09-29 12:29 GMT+02:00 Marco Ciampa : > > > Secondo la mia immodestissima opinione il sito openstreetmap è > > completamente forviante per i principianti. > > > > > si, è vero che si rivolge sempre a

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 13:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > Nel tuo esempio potrei andare in Via Idomeneo anche di notte in macchina, ma > non posso uscire? No, di notte non puoi entrare nel centro storico. Puoi entrare solo in alcune strade di giorno (orario 6-21). Ciao,

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 13:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > hai un link alla delibera? Non ce l'ho, ma sul portale opendata le ZTL del centro storico sono ben visibili: http://dati.comune.lecce.it/dataset/ztl-apu-centro-storico-lecce/resource/d5fe4782-adb8-4e15-be39-29717088e678

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 12:24 GMT+02:00 Federico Cortese : > > Può darsi che per Roma vada bene, ma nell'esempio che facevo prima non > so come si potrebbe usare un'area, perchè ci sono singole strade che > hanno limitazioni diverse. > Queste strade: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s3U > sono

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

2017-09-29 12:29 GMT+02:00 Marco Ciampa : > Secondo la mia immodestissima opinione il sito openstreetmap è > completamente forviante per i principianti. > si, è vero che si rivolge sempre a delle persone abbastanza affine con la tecnologia, nonostante dicono di no ;-) > >

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

2017-09-29 12:15 GMT+02:00 Daniele Zotta : > Buongiorno, > mi chiamo Daniele, sono al 5° anno all'Istituto Tecnico Tecnologico - > Informatica a Pergine Valsugana (TN). In questo periodo sto effettuando uno > stage in Fondazione Bruno Kessler e il mio tutor Maurizio 'napo'

Re: [Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

2017-09-29 12:15 GMT+02:00 Daniele Zotta : > il dataset del comune di Trento é distribuito con licenza CC0 > ottimo > >- per una questione di ordine e doppioni si é scelto di inserire solo >i numeri civici corrispondenti agli ingressi principali, poiché nel

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Centre commercial déplacé

Pas a jour sur l'imagerie Bing, mais ok sur Digital Globe Premium qui montre aussi la zone démolie Le 29 septembre 2017 à 09:35, Lionel Allorge a écrit : > Bonjour, > > J'ai constaté qu'un centre commercial à Rambouillet avait été changé de > place, le nouveau

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le Zone a Traffico Limitato ZTL

2017-09-29 11:13 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > Per me la cosa più facile da controllare e aggiornare sarebbe creare un area > (per il nome della ZTL, per il rendering), e mettere tutti i varchi (dove le > strade si interseccano con l'area) con appositi tag access. Ai

Re: [Talk-it] Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:09AM +0200, Lorenzo "Beba" Beltrami wrote: > Il giorno 29 settembre 2017 09:10, Cascafico Giovanni > ha scritto: > > > OSM mi pare sia nomionato, una volta, in fondo all'articolo, nemmeno > > linkato; ovviamente la sua apparizione non è

[Talk-it] Import numeri civici Trento

Buongiorno, mi chiamo Daniele, sono al 5° anno all'Istituto Tecnico Tecnologico - Informatica a Pergine Valsugana (TN). In questo periodo sto effettuando uno stage in Fondazione Bruno Kessler e il mio tutor Maurizio 'napo' Napolitano mi ha fatto comparare i numeri civici del comune Trento e quelli

Re: [Talk-it] [Talk-it-lazio] nasoni / was Parlano di noi su Repubblica :-)

2017-09-29 11:40 GMT+02:00 FelynX : > > Lascio a chi è più esperto la questione type/style, per quanto riguarda > invece "it", imho, trattandosi di un nome tipico non specificherei la lingua per me, "style" sarebbe qualcosa come "moderno", "barocco", ecc., mentre "type"

  1   2   >