On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:48:18 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM>> I don't think we can be clearer than that. I have only one
AM>> addition. If I could use virtual folders, I'd use them in my main account
AM>> *only*.
> That's your choice.
Well, of course. I only brought up my pe
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:16:08 -0500GMT (11/01/2000, 05:16 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> First of all, *some* mail. Second: *physically*, it is in it's
>> respective accounts, only the *links* to the messages are in VFs. Hence,
>> even if you *have* a VF, you still can access the ac
Hello Jast & all fellow TBUDL members,
Monday, January 10, 2000, 7:43:01 PM, Jast wrote:
J> there is also something like an account column (the folder column)
J> that also indicates the account.
You only see that when you are there or have run a search that turned
it up. An account column woul
Morning Alexander V. Kiselev,
> Hence the code necessary is already there (at least, partially:-))
More than that, there is also something like an account column (the
folder column) that also indicates the account. BTW I believe I
already suggested exactly this virtual folders feature quite a
Morning Moosebreath,
> I will say the TB users are some of the most tenacious users and
> defenders of their software I have come across.
Indeed. This seems to be a general phenomena with functional and
powerful software by small developers or software with an established
community, which the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:57:19 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Right. And where is the problem of mailing people from one account
> as opposed to another. I dunno about you but I file messages my dad
> sends me at work to my home account and reply from there. That *IS*
> what the home account is
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:38:36 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> Virtual folders, mail all in one location.
> First of all, *some* mail. Second: *physically*, it is in it's
> respective accounts, only the *links* to the messages are in VFs. Hence,
> even if you *have* a VF, you still can ac
Hi there!
On 10 Jan 00, at 9:01, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > John, if you don't the traffic to be unnecessarily raised again, please
> > don't argue with him. Besides, it's senseless since he doesn't listen to
> > y
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 11:06:32 AM, Alexander wrote:
> John, if you don't the traffic to be unnecessarily raised again, please
> don't argue with him. Besides, it's senseless since he doesn't listen to
> you.
Oh I do listen. I also think about and either accept or discard what is
said bas
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 9:27:08 AM, Allie wrote:
>To keep the messages from one particular individual or group together.
Right. And where is the problem of mailing people from one account as
opposed to another. I dunno about you but I file messages my dad sends me at
work to my home accou
Hello Allie & all fellow TBUDL members,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 11:27:08 AM, Allie wrote:
AM> To keep the messages from one particular individual or group
AM> together.
AM> It's easier for me to browse messages in one folder instead of
AM> opening four different folders in four different acc
Hello Moosebreath,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 at 17:23:48 [GMT -0800], you wrote:
M> I will say the TB users are some of the most tenacious users and
M> defenders of their software I have come across.
Here, here, I'll drink to that!
Would this qualify as a "me too" message?
Bad Leif, bad, bad Leif!
Hello Marck,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 4:07:52 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Hi John,
MDP> On 09 January 2000 at 14:03:18 GMT -0800 (which was 22:03 where I
MDP> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JR>> It's just little things like a button to show all new messages no
JR>> matter wh
Hi John,
On 09 January 2000 at 14:03:18 GMT -0800 (which was 22:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JR> It's just little things like a button to show all new messages no
JR> matter which folders, in which account they are in.
Check out the ticker. The ticker
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 11:06:32 AM, you wrote:
AVK> Hi there!
AVK> On 9 Jan 00, at 9:11, Moosebreath wrote
AVK> about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
>> SL> Which is personalities and does break the paradigm of TB!. Why people
>
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 11:26, Januk Aggarwal wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > A good analog of what I'm talking about is the search facility.
>
> If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
> create folders w
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:26:38 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
> create folders which, when selected, perform a predefined search on
> your message database, right? If that's all there is to it, I could
> see that having huge pot
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 22:06:32 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
> Just look what he says: he calls "virtual folders" idea "personalities paradigm".
> He doesn't even care to think it over! He never saw DOS navigator with its
> Temp panel, he never saw FAR that utilises the same idea
Hello Allie,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 9:27:08 AM, you wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> A good analog of what I'm talking about is the search facility.
If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
create folders which, when selected
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 9:11, Moosebreath wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> SL> Which is personalities and does break the paradigm of TB!. Why people
> SL> want to mungle everything together is utterly beyond me.
>
> You keep referring to &quo
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> What Alex and others have been getting at is that when you move the
>> message and create a reply, it will use the parameters of the account
>> and folder to which you moved it and not that of the account and folder
>> which you moved it fro
Hello Steve,
SL> Which is personalities and does break the paradigm of TB!. Why people
SL> want to mungle everything together is utterly beyond me.
You keep referring to "Paradigm", which means model or pattern
(yes, I know you know the meaning), usually the original pattern
comes from the
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:53:34 AM, Allie wrote:
> What Alex and others have been getting at is that when you move the message
> and create a reply, it will use the parameters of the account and folder to
> which you moved it and not that of the account and folder which you moved it
> from.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:37:17 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Uhm, no, it isn't. When I move a message from the inbox in
> morpheus@rpglink to slamb3@corp the message is physically moved. It is not
> "linked" in any way to either account aside from its physical location.
What Alex and oth
Friday, January 07, 2000, 7:58:37 PM, Douglas wrote:
> By incorporating an optional accounts column, all you're doing is changing
> the visualization of the message. The message IS linked to an account.
Uhm, no, it isn't. When I move a message from the inbox in
morpheus@rpglink to slamb3@cor
Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:09:15 PM, Derek wrote:
> Faster than Pocomail, and all the MS products...So you can have
> features without dragging the program down to MS or Netscape type
> bloat.
Not as fast as some that I've seen. Too bad it also doesn't have a decent
interface. That alone r
On Saturday 8 January 2000 Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Parizh) and London (we pronounce it with two "o"s):-))
And that's probably not too far from the truth ;-)
John
--
you gave me something that i could touch in a world where i'd had too much
something i could feel with my broken hands full
Hi there!
On 8 Jan 00, at 14:07, Michael Heydekamp wrote
about "OT: Moldova":
> >> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> >> these issues themselves.
>
> AVK> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia
> AVK> when it was a part of USSR. Ju
Dear Alexander,
on Saturday, January 08, 2000, 00:01, you wrote:
>> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
>> these issues themselves.
AVK> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia
AVK> when it was a part of USSR. Just in order to be precise:-
Hallo Nick,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:24:09 -0800 GMT (08.01.2000, 15:24 +0800 GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> Not only was that remark not warranted, and completely
NA> unsubstantiated, it certainly didn't belong on the List.
Point taken. My apologies to the list members.
--
Cheers,
Thomas
On Friday, January 07, 2000, 9:59:22 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> IOW, political comments have nothing to do in this list.
I agree Thomas... but with all due respect, you should heed your own
advice. That message should have been sent directly to Steve, as this one
is to you.
BTW, I'm a Canadi
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:28:19 -0800 GMT (08.01.2000, 07:28 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Feh, any country over there that can't keep its name for more than 2
SL> decades should expect to be called all other names it has ever gone by in the
SL> past. ;P
SL> Same for citie
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 07, 2000, 12:52:50 PM, Steve wrote:
SL> The two paradigms, "personalities" and separate accounts,
SL> combined, has never been done. How is that not a different
SL> paradigm?
*Now* I see what the problem is. You are conceiving this in a
d
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 21:09, Derek Cedillo wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> And for what it's worth...even with Pegasus at 4.5 MB or whatever it
> is, it is the fastest mail system I've ever used. Faster than TB!
thrice in my own tests:-)
>
Hello Steve,
Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:25:47 PM:
SL> Hey, lemme ask this, honestly. How many people saw me say that having the
SL> option to apply filters to all accounts would be a good thing? I bet not
SL> many.
I sure didn't, it was hard to read
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:31:39 -0500, Derek Cedillo wrote:
[..snip..]
> No, MicroSoft product *tells* you what you want. They never ask. 90%
> of the people I work with complain regularly about MS and how they
> added features that they never need. The difference here is, we are
> asking for featur
On Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:34:30 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> Furthermore, there is only so much that you can put into "options"
SL>> before people look at the options, get intimidated, and look
SL>> elsewhere. That is where multiple products come in.
> That's another valid point tha
Hello Steve,
Thanks for another arrogant reply, you must be proud.
Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 2:03:38 PM:
SL> Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:36:54 AM, cid wrote:
>> Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
>> to deal with the The
Hello Steve,
I still think the way to do this is to keep account seperate...but
just have "Global filters" that work an all accounts or a subset of
accounts. In fact, that almost goes against bloat...because you
wouldn't have to run duplicate filters ever. (This is of course
particular to my situ
0:52, Steve Lamb wrote
AVK> about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
>> Quite frankly, if Alex is happy with Pegasus and how it works, all
>> the power to him. Why he is still on TB! mailing list is beyond me since it
>> clearly doesn't work in the manner he chooses.
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 15:28, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Enough already.":
> >> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> >> these issues themselves.
>
> > Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
> > part of USSR. Ju
Friday, January 07, 2000, 3:01:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
>> these issues themselves.
> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
> part of USSR. Just in order to be precise:-)
Feh, any c
Friday, January 07, 2000, 2:34:30 PM, Douglas wrote:
SL>> If you consider it a shortcoming then that is clearly a perception
SL>> issue and *IS* a problem between chair and keyboard.
> On whose end?
Theirs since many here have expressed that they do not consider it a
shortcoming.
SL>> Bully
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 16:34, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Enough already (Was: Re: Peg":
> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> these issues themselves.
Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
part of USSR. Ju
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 07, 2000, Steve unfortunately wrote:
SL> If you consider it a shortcoming then that is clearly a perception
SL> issue and *IS* a problem between chair and keyboard.
On whose end?
when "Cid" said:
>> You may not care to deal with mail fr
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about "Enough already...":
> I'm just a TB! newbie (yet a definite internet and email veteran) and
> I agree with Alex with all of this.
Thanx:-) I support the subject you've chosen for this message. I'm going to
abandon this thread
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 10:52, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> Quite frankly, if Alex is happy with Pegasus and how it works, all
> the power to him. Why he is still on TB! mailing list is beyond me since it
> clearly doesn't work in the m
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 14:56:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh, I see now...I thought you were describe the ability to have a
> single filter work for different accounts. You just meant to put in
> the folder of a different account. You still need different (and
> possibly duplicate) filters fo
At Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:58:08 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:41:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> [ SNIP ]
[SNIP]
>If you have more than one accounts setup, open any of your filters
>and look at the 'Move messages to folder" option. Scroll down and
you'll
>see the folders for the
Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:36:54 AM, cid wrote:
> Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
> to deal with the The Bat!s shorcomings besides "what's between the
> chair and the keyboard", as you put it.
"Cid", what you, and Alex, are not understanding is that I
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:41:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [ SNIP ]
>> A multiple personality type setup may be created by the user with
>> the use of filters quite easily when I think about it, especially since mail
>> may be filtered across accounts. The support seems to already b
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:36:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..snip..]
> You may not care to deal with mail from multiple accounts as one, but
> some of us do. I don't want to redirect messages all over the place,
> bouncing them through my ISP or anywhere else for that matter. For
> example, I
Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:33:32 AM, Allie wrote:
> a) Add new email address to existing account.
> b) Create new Account
>How is adding the a) option to go along with the already existing
> b) option a paradigm shift? :)
Because it requires merging the streams and requires either
At Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:33:32 -0500, you wrote:
[ SNIP ]
>A multiple personality type setup may be created by the user with
the use
>of filters quite easily when I think about it, especially since mail
may
>be filtered across accounts. The support seems to already be there.
Sounds like this is gre
I'm just a TB! newbie (yet a definite internet and email veteran) and
I agree with Alex with all of this.
Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
to deal with the The Bat!s shorcomings besides "what's between the
chair and the keyboard", as you put it.
You may not
Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:30:21 AM, Alexander wrote:
> I never argue with people that shout on me. That is, get lost, sir. Besides,
> AFAIK all-caps are a no-no on this very mailing list.
Considering you weren't reading what was being written in the first place
I had to try alternate tact
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:02:54 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
>> Please explain why the hell do you insist on calling "harmful" the (little)
>> feature I've explained in my previous mail message, which explanation you've
>> deliberately cut out?
> Because it requires a paradigm shift in t
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 10:02, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
I never argue with people that shout on me. That is, get lost, sir. Besides,
AFAIK all-caps are a no-no on this very mailing list.
> I have read it, I do understand it. Common sense. Sen
Friday, January 07, 2000, 9:43:00 AM, Alexander wrote:
> Please explain why the hell do you insist on calling "harmful" the (little)
> feature I've explained in my previous mail message, which explanation you've
> deliberately cut out?
Because it requires a paradigm shift in the whole program
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 8:51, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > Seems *not* to be different to me, since the messages containing the
> > discussions of the *same* mathematical problems arrive to all three of
> > them:-) Technically, it&#x
Friday, January 07, 2000, 8:27:00 AM, Alexander wrote:
> Seems *not* to be different to me, since the messages containing the
> discussions of the *same* mathematical problems arrive to all three of
> them:-) Technically, it's different, but for *me* as a mathematician
> they aren't...
Then
Hi there!
On 6 Jan 00, at 23:45, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> >> All this means, that I frequently want to deal with the traffic
> >> coming to three above-mentioned accounts as with one single input
> >> stream.
>
>
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 9:45:43 PM, Douglas wrote:
> he wants the source to be clearly *identified* and to be able to
> automatically organize each message according to the source account at
> will,
He can do that with filtering as well.
>>> If I do so, I'll need to switch the account us
Hi there!
On 6 Jan 00, at 16:06, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > The "input stream" doesn't differ very much between these accounts, only
> > here I get the mailing lists traffic, too.
>
> Three different servers. Seem
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 6:26:27 PM, tracer wrote:
> The simpler your filters the better they will work. I have no need for
> regular expressions on them (g)
I beg to differ. I prefer to have one regex filter that would catch
mailing list mail and filter it into a folder under the "Mailin
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:45:02 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 07, 2000, 3:45:02 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cid> So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only work on a
cid> particular account?
cid> There's no way to set a
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:06:11 -0800GMT (07/01/2000, 08:06 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> If I do so, I'll need to switch the account used when sending the reply,
>> which is the operation I'm in a habit of forgetting to accomplish all the
>> time:-)
SL> Drag it to the right account
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, January 06, 2000, Steve wrote in response to Alexander saying:
>> All this means, that I frequently want to deal with the traffic
>> coming to three above-mentioned accounts as with one single input
>> stream.
SL> Why? You are still retrieving
Hello Alexander,
Written in response to your letter of Thursday, January 06, 2000, 6:43:06 PM:
AVK> Hi there!
AVK> On 6 Jan 00, at 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
AVK> about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
>> So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only w
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:13:28 -0800GMT (07/01/2000, 01:13 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Correct. But I use my local log-in ISP's SMTP server for all accounts
>> anyway. They don't seem to mind the "from" address, as long as you are
>> correctly logged in (with password et al) to them.
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 3:43:06 PM, Alexander wrote:
> The "input stream" doesn't differ very much between these accounts, only
> here I get the mailing lists traffic, too.
Three different servers. Seems to be different to me.
> All this means, that I frequently want to deal with the tr
Hi there!
On 6 Jan 00, at 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only work on a
> particular account?
So now you got the whole idea:-) *I* don't like it, and the reasoning is the
follow
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 at 15:45:02 GMT -0500 [Friday, January 07, 2000
03:45 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
cin> So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only work on a
cin> particular account?
Correct.
cin> There's no way to set a global filter set for a
So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only work on a
particular account?
There's no way to set a global filter set for all incoming mail?
(other than the forwarding options, and moving messages around first?)
Should seem that it would be nice to have a little check box:
Apply to all accoun
Hello TBUDL,
On Wednesday, January 05, 2000, , Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> 5 accounts (one for each of my e-mail addresses, since its all different dial-
> ups:-)), and into *each* of these 5 inboxes messages from my supervisor are
> likely to find their way. And now what? Now, obviously, I'
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 10:21:53 AM, Januk wrote:
> What I would like to see is the ability activate a filter set based on age
> of messages. Essentially combine the keep message database for x days and
> the read message filter set. That way I could choose to archive all messages
> in the fol
Steve Lamb wrote:
> As for archiving proper, I don't think any client really does offer decent
> automatic archiving. Then again, I am of the school of thought that I can
> always do it myself. If I want archives I'm going to do it right with a
> proper archiver and do incremental timed bac
Hi there!
On 6 Jan 00, at 1:27, Larry Barrett wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> AVK> Okay, Steve, let's finish with this:-) Besides, others here aren't pretty
> AVK> interested in all this, as far as I can see.
>
> Wrong - I learn m
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 8:55:01 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Correct. But I use my local log-in ISP's SMTP server for all accounts
> anyway. They don't seem to mind the "from" address, as long as you are
> correctly logged in (with password et al) to them.
Can you say that for the individual you g
Hallo Steve,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:25:41 -0800 GMT (07.01.2000, 00:25 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Or enable View/From in the editor window.
SL> IIRC this does not change through which SMTP server the message is sent.
SL> That can cause problems with the anti-relay rules some ISPs have
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 10:33:08 PM, Thomas wrote:
> Or enable View/From in the editor window.
IIRC this does not change through which SMTP server the message is sent.
That can cause problems with the anti-relay rules some ISPs have put in place.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 8:05:20 PM, tracer wrote:
> I see nothing complicated on the few emails going to the wrong place
> to get an filter added.
Exactly. I think it is less of a burden than keeping it all separate
through filters.
> More important I think is that the current backup s
Hello Carsten Dreesbach,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 at 08:04:14 GMT +0100 [Thursday, January 06, 2000
14:04 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
TF>> Or enable View/From in the editor window. That's what I do. If
TF>> you don't like what you see, you can easily change "from" address
TF>> by eitehr cli
Hello tracer,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 at 11:05:20 GMT +0700 [Thursday, January 06, 2000
11:05 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
Steve>> Yes, I've done that to my boss at one time when I finally separated my
Steve>> personal from private mail and he insisted on using the wrong one.
t> My expar
Hello Thomas,, 2000, 1:33:08 AM, you wrote:
TF> Hi Steve,
TF> On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:19:59 -0800GMT (06/01/2000, 03:19 +0800GMT),
TF> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> 3. Changing "Send from account..." Is there a more visible way to do
>>> this?
Hi Carsten,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:04:14 +0100GMT (06/01/2000, 15:04 +0800GMT),
Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
TF>> Or enable View/From in the editor window. That's what I do. If you
TF>> don't like what you see, you can easily change "from" address by
TF>> eitehr clicking on that little arrow on the r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Thomas,
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 7:33:08 AM, you wrote:
TF> Or enable View/From in the editor window. That's what I do. If you
TF> don't like what you see, you can easily change "from" address by
TF> eitehr clicking on that little arrow on th
Hi Alexander,
you killed this horse before we out here in the Far East even read it.
:-( It has been most educational following your dialogue, as you both
seem to know "the other programme" quite well. Thus, let me comment:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:54:57 +0300GMT (06/01/2000, 06:54 +0800GMT),
Alexa
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:19:59 -0800GMT (06/01/2000, 03:19 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> 3. Changing "Send from account..." Is there a more visible way to do
>> this?
SL> Yes, click on the account before sending. ;)
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:13:08 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 06, 2000, 6:13:08 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Or, what I would do, drag the mail to the right folder, reply, and inform
Steve> him not to use the other addresses for
m. I can hardly wait for the next chapter of - "Pegasus vs. The
Bat!.:)
--
Best regards,
Larrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message t
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 05:32:08AM +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> First of all, you and I use e-mail for different purposes and besides we've
> got different habits of working with it, hence we're not likely to arrive to
> a common denominator here:-) Anyhow, a couple of comments below:
Hi there!
On 5 Jan 00, at 15:13, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
Okay, Steve, let's finish with this:-) Besides, others here aren't pretty
interested in all this, as far as I can see. A couple of final remarks, though.
First of all, you and I use
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 2:54:57 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> No, there is a lot more to it than that.
> Having read this message of yours, I still don't see other differences...
Forcing the user to filter to gain a sane default is the difference.
> For you, but not for me.
Right.
Hi there!
On 5 Jan 00, at 14:14, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > Seems that the two things that you call "multiple accounts" and "multiple
> > instances" differ only when the folder structure is concerned.
>
> No, t
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 1:48:56 PM, Alexander wrote:
> Seems that the two things that you call "multiple accounts" and "multiple
> instances" differ only when the folder structure is concerned.
No, there is a lot more to it than that.
> At least, in the case of Pegasus. In PMail, two id
Hi there!
On 5 Jan 00, at 12:26, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > Nope, doesn't sound like it then from the rest of your description. It
> > has "Accounts" as in completely separate instances of Pegasus but not
> > "acc
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 12:07:27 PM, Steve wrote:
> Nope, doesn't sound like it then from the rest of your description. It
> has "Accounts" as in completely separate instances of Pegasus but not
> "accounts" as in different mail accounts in a single instance.
I was correct. It does
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 11:59:47 AM, Alexander wrote:
> I don't think so, David Harris isn't expected to rewrite *everything*:-) In
> fact, *I* personally have nothing against MDI. As you, I use virtual
> desktops alot, but contrary to you, MDI doesn't prevent me from working
> efficiently. I
Hi there!
On 5 Jan 00, at 11:22, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> > For version 3.2 (expected to be released in February, this year) alot of visual
> > improvements are planned. Besides, what version of PMail were you using?
>
> I hav
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
