Hello TBUDL,
I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
"inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
I must do to get this working?
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Current version
Two questions on Inbox-Known:
1. When my cursor in on Inbox-Known and I on New Message, the account
that is being used is Account1234, by default. I don't recall setting
the account to be used for Inbox-known. Is there a way to set the
default account to another account? [I don't kn
Hi :
What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
Thanks.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello TB! Users,
Can any body tell me, what the meaning of the folder "Inbox-known" ?
--
Regards,
Haye
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL
What happened to the inbox-known feature I saw in 1.60b? It appears to
be gone in 1.60c.
--
Best regards,
Curt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
With this new known filter adding people to your address book becomes
a lot more important. But there is no way currently to quickly remove
people from the address book. It is a two click process to add
someone. . . but quite a bit more complicated to remove them.
So my feature request is for a
Hello list
Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
"Inbox-Known" folder which was created automatically on
installation?
--
Best regards,
Andy
Current version is 1.61 | &q
Hello,
Anyone know how to get it back?
Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpdGJieGYy2z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInf
On Thu 16-Jun-05 8:21pm -0500, Darrin wrote:
> I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
> "inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
> I must do to get this working?
What do you mean by "doesn't seem to work?
Hello Bill,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 7:06:15 PM, you wrote:
> If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that
> should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else?
> If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a
> sender address that is really in your address book and
> the filter i
led "" (without the quotes). You are not
really missing anything important - I have mine
disabled.
I created my own called "known" with put messages not
with me as a sender (I'm in the address book) AND with
the sender in the address book. The actions is to move
to Inbox-kn
Hello Darrin,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:20:24 -0700 GMT (17/06/2005, 09:20 +0700 GMT),
Darrin wrote:
D> It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
D> no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
f
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:22:23 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few
local filters for my new IMAP account, s
nd on further reflection, immediately after sending the send button
on last message, notice there is no inbox-known created for that
account.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.5.27 o
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 17-Jun-2005 at 17:56 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
> sending the send button
That button didn't arrive here yet, however... ;-)
SCNR!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is playing: "Dub Angel" (3:49) by
Hello Dwight,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:50:52 -0500 GMT (17/06/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good chan
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 11:23:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DAC>> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
> Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
I don't know either. Figured the only to learn whether that was
because of the differences, or whether it was an oversig
Hello Thomas,
Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but
how do I re-create the filter?
Thanks
-
Hello Jeff,
Saturday, June 18, 2005, 1:18:07 AM, you wrote:
> The condition is:
> Address Book Contains Sender
> Action is:
> Move To The Folder (folder name)
Great! Thank you much :)
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z> Request?
I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
Templates | Over-ride | Ignore
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3
Hello,
Sunday, June 11, 2006, 7:48:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the
> "Common Folder Properties" comes up. In that Properties box, all I get
> are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Template
Hello Raymund,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:43:45 +0200 GMT (25/Sep/10, 15:43 PM +0700 GMT),
Raymund Tump wrote:
>> What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
RT> Well, there should be a Known filter in your sorting office. That
RT> would move all messages t
Haye,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, at 10:45:45 [GMT +0700] (which was 9:15 AM where I live) you
wrote:
H> Can any body tell me, what the meaning of the folder "Inbox-known" ?
This I believe beta issue and am not sure if its to be discussed here.
In short this is an attempt to
Hello Curt,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 12:14:35 PM, you wrote:
CA> What happened to the inbox-known feature I saw in 1.60b? It appears to
CA> be gone in 1.60c.
I am using the "c" version and it still has the InBox
known feature. You have to have the email addresses
already in y
Hello Curt,
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:14:35 -0400GMT (22-4-02, 22:14 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
CA> What happened to the inbox-known feature I saw in 1.60b? It appears to
CA> be gone in 1.60c.
Still present. Maybe you deactivated the known filter, that makes the
known-inbox g
Hello William,
On Monday, April 22, 2002 at 11:51:14 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
WE> So my feature request is for a "remove from address book" as a right
WE> click option for any email address.
WE> What do you guys think?
I think it is already p
Is there any documentation available on the Inbox - Known folder; how it
works, etc.? TheBat! 1.60h Help file lacks documentation on this mail
folder.
If there is a web page providing such documentation, please cite the URL.
Thank you.
--
Using The Bat! v1.60h
OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
Known" in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about it in the documentation.
--
Alan Little
Holot
Sh'mae Andy,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, at 23:52:31 [GMT +0100] (23:52 where I live) you wrote:
AM> Hello list
AM> Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
AM> "Inbox-Known" folder which was created automatically on
AM> installation?
There is
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:42:44 -0800, Roberto Machorro [RM] graced us
with these comments: ...
RM>> I think that the "Inbox - Known" is a good idea
Maybe it is, but to me it just seems like a typical case of software
bloat and redundancy, albeit probably on a small scale here.
Ba
Hello Yuki Taga,
On Monday, March 25 2002 at 03:27 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Maybe it is, but to me it just seems like a typical case of software
> bloat and redundancy, albeit probably on a small scale here.
That pretty much sums up my view on it as well, and you can add the
SmartBat memo pad 'thin
On 26-3-02 at 01:16, Nick Andriash kindly wrote:
> Hello Yuki Taga,
>> Maybe it is, but to me it just seems like a typical case of software
>> bloat and redundancy, albeit probably on a small scale here.
> That pretty much sums up my view on it as well, and you can add the
> SmartBat memo pad 't
i
have with someone ends up in the Inbox - Known.
some filtering cannot be left to automatons and has to be done in your
head. mail left in the Inbox is likely spam, whereas mail in the
Inbox-Known is most probably not spam and therefore relevant enough for
you to give it some TLA.
together with othe
Hello Nick!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 1:16:52 AM you wrote:
> That pretty much sums up my view on it as well, and you can add the
> SmartBat memo pad 'thingy' and calculator to that list as well. Sorry
> RITLabs but there are much more important enhancements needed.
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:05:33 +0900, Yuki Taga [YT] wrote these comments:
...
DH>> The SmartBat is useful for transferring text of any kind (including
DH>> filters) between accounts, messages, even programmes).
YT> Easier than copy to the clipboard an
explored this one
at all. :))
ACM> You can manage multiple clips of text with it. You can format them and
ACM> manipulate them as you wish. You can't do that with the clipboard.
I'm not surprised there is more to it than that. The developers
aren't likely to add completely usele
Hello Nick.
At 7:16 PM on Monday, March 25, 2002 you wrote the following
about ["Inbox - Known" - general comments (Was: Changing
properties for "Inbox - Known")]:
Nick> [...] there are much more important enhancements
Nick> needed. [/...]
What enhancements
ver
> to route "unknown" mail to another account. I get that one once a day,
> leaving the "known" mail for an account I read often, sometimes using
> a wireless device.
---
>From my experience, you have the choice whether to retain this folder.
I've deleted &quo
Hello Yuki!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 1:27:11 PM you wrote:
> But, it does strike me as an extreme power user kind of thing. I'm
> sure it's going to be useful for some, maybe even many. But I think
> you'll agree that there are a ton of folks who will never do more
> than open it once, gape
Hello Michael!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 12:58:08 PM you wrote:
> I agree, but it would be nice to be able to delete it.
I seem to be the only one never having trouble deleting it. I tested
it some time back during beta (when it was introduced), decided I
won't need it at the moment and jus
It was foretold that on 26-3-2002 @ 07:43:49 GMT-0500 (which was 13:43
where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and spread these wise comments on
""Inbox - Known" - general comments (Was: Changing properties for
"Inbox - Known")":
JR> What enhancements are @ the top of
Hello Luc
At 2:24 PM on Tuesday, March 26, 2002 you wrote the
following about ["Inbox - Known" - general comments (Was:
Changing properties for "Inbox - Known")]:
JR>> What enhancements are @ the top of your list?
Luc> A fully written help file would be nice
It was foretold that on 26-3-2002 @ 14:39:41 GMT-0500 (which was 20:39
where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and spread these wise comments on
""Inbox - Known" - general comments (Was: Changing properties for
"Inbox - Known")":
JR> Agreed. Anything else @ the top
t; I'm not surprised there is more to it than that. The developers
YT> aren't likely to add completely useless features -- *except* for
YT> probably the Inbox - Known and the Menu Navigator. (ducking and
YT> running again) (^_-) But, it does strike me as an extreme powe
Hello Darrin,
DR> Anyone know how to get it back?
DR> Thanks
I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
that will add it back.
when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
$KNOWN$
with the "$" on both sides.
--
Bes
Hi Paul,
On 7/22/2004 12:10 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
PC> that will add it back.
PC> when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
PC> $KNOWN$
PC> with the "$" on both sides.
That did the trick thanks :
Hello Group
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 3:00:48 AM, Darrin wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
>> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
>> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
> I checked and nothing. I know ho
Hello friends,
In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address
book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any
of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known
folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
--
Darrin
Using The Bat
Sunday, June 11, 2006, Robert D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z>> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z>> Request?
> I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
> Templates | Over-ride | Ignor
Upgrading from b to c, the inbox - known folders remain. But, I did a
fresh install of c today--no knowns, nor is there a known filter
anywhere in sight.
Also, did an upgrade of a 1.53 to 1.60c and no knowns appeared.
Bug?
--
Best regards,
Curt
Monday, April 22
PP> I think it is already partial available ...
PP> +W will add sender to address book, +B will delete it ... I
PP> don't know if I'd really need the very same option for _every_
PP> e-mail-address in the message text :-)
PP> If I don't want to receive mail anymore from a specific person and tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@02 May 2002, 20:22:16 -0400 (01:22 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there any documentation available on the Inbox - Known folder; how it
> works, etc.? TheBat! 1.60h H
On Friday, June 14, 2002, Alan Little wrote...
> Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
> I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
> Known" in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
> What is this for? I can'
Hey Alan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 10:43:56 AM.
AL> Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
AL> I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
AL> Known" in each of my accounts, just abo
Hey Jonathan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 11:16:22 AM.
JA> As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA> nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
Not a bad idea...
Marck?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
@14 June 2002, 11:20:14 -0400 (16:20 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA>> As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA>> nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;
On Monday, June 17, 2002, 18:21, Joseph N. wrote:
> I cannot delete the filter. The folder's long gone, and the 'remove'
> button in the Sorting Office is grayed out for the 'Known' filter.
Same here. I think I deleted it somewhere during the beta series,
haven't looked at it since. Sorry, sho
rry
>> RITLabs but there are much more important enhancements needed.
DH> The Inbox - Known can be of help if one does not have much experience
DH> with filtering. It is therefore a good (and very small) addition to
DH> beginners. (Note: I haven't used it, yet.)
I would think t
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 1:58:16 AM, Dierk scribbled:
DH> The Inbox - Known can be of help if one does not have much experience
DH> with filtering. It is therefore a good (and very small) addition to
DH> beginners. (Note: I haven't used it, yet.)
I agree, but it would be nice
As did I. No problem deleting it at all. Then when I finally figured
out that it was a much better way to filter spam than the stuff I had
I recreated the folder and then found out I could name it whatever I
wanted and did so. Just have to edit the known filter to use the new
folder name.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 6:39:59 AM, Geoff scribbled:
>>From my experience, you have the choice whether to retain this folder.
GL> I've deleted "Inbox - Known" from my copy of TB! 1.60. To do this, I
GL> ensured that the "Known" filter was inactive, the
OK, now I understand what you mean. I don't understand why that is a
problem. Just disable it and move to the bottom.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 1:40:55 PM, you wrote:
MD> It's not the folder. It's the filter. You are not allowed to delete
MD> the filter.
--
Gene
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 2:37:39 PM, Gene scribbled:
GG> OK, now I understand what you mean. I don't understand why that is a
GG> problem. Just disable it and move to the bottom.
It's a matter of aesthetics and performance. I don't use it, so I want
to get rid of it and make things tidy.
actually showing up in my inbox-known
D> folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
I guess your known filter could be inactive or all messages could be
processed by other filters. My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:30:56 AM, you wrote:
RO> My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
RO> latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
RO> real filters.
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 12:46:39 PM, in
, Darrin wrote:
> I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
> think Ill just delete it.
You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
--
Best regards,
MFPA
We are all in the gutte
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote:
M> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
Nope. Didnt show up.
--
Darrin
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.6
Hallo MFPA,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:04:28 +GMT (4-12-2005, 22:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
>> I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
>> think Ill just delete it.
M> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
IIRC that depends on whether the known
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 9:19:52 PM, in
, Roelof Otten wrote:
M>> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
> IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not.
Only tried once and it came back. I expect the filter was active
because I think I have never alter
Hello Batfolk,
I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts, but
nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either.
It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for?
Thanks for the help.
--
Andrew Diederich
Using Voyager v3
Hello,
I'd searched the list subjects but couldn't see any subject that
referred to my subject. So apologies if it's been covered and everyone
except me and my dogs knows this...
When I upgraded to 1.60 only the accounts that were currently expanded
had the new folder Inbox-Know
. Good Job!
I only have two questions:
I think that the "Inbox - Known" is a good idea, but I would rather
have the known e-mails go to my "Inbox" and unknown e-mails go to
"Inbox - Unknown", this is because I frecuently sync with my handheld
via MAPI, and it polls
oomba, then somebody else did; I persevered with Poco. What a waste of
a year.
Now, I've just gone through my ten accounts and activated the 'inbox - known'
filter but on one of those accounts (the third to be stet up) it was missing.
Not a great problem - I just created it, but d
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
"What is Inbox - Known for?"
> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it,
> either. It does look like a system generated folder.
Hi Andrew,
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
AAD> Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get
AD> is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If
AD> Inbox - Known was just a referenc
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in
PM> There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta.
You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not
exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-(
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1.
What is the logic for the "Inbox - Known" automatic filtering in
conjunction with the address book?
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 6:16:39 AM PST, David Stone wrote:
> Is this the correct way to create these new 'Inbox-Known' folders?
I'm a bit curious about this too. I installed v1.60 over my previous
version (1.53t), and I do
Hello Melissa Reese,
On Sunday, March 24 2002 at 09:29 AM PDT, you wrote:
> Even after activating the filter, and testing by sending myself mail
> from a "known" address, the message simply goes into the regular
> "Inbox", and there is no "Inbox-Known"
Sunday, March 24, 2002 9:49 PM GMT -0800 (PST)
Hello Melissa, This is a reply to your message dated
Sunday, March 24, 2002, 9:29:40 AM, when you wrote:
MR> On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 6:16:39 AM PST, David Stone wrote:
>> Is this the correct way to create these new 'Inbox-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 9:55:09 PM PST, Wayne Black wrote:
> Just create a new folder for each account and name it $Known$ (with
> the dollar signs) This creats an "Inbox - Known" folder.
Thank you Wayne - it worked. Now that
Hello Wayne
You wrote On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, at 21:55:09 [GMT -0800] (16:55 Monday where I live):-
MR>> I'm a bit curious about this too. I installed v1.60 over my previous
MR>> version (1.53t), and I don't see any "Inbox-Known" folders. However -
MR>> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
@25 March 2002, 15:50:53 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This does sound *very* useful, many thanks for a prompt and
> detailed reply.
This response was a superb example of the
It was foretold that on 25-3-2002 @ 11:42:44 GMT-0800 (which was 20:42
where I live) Roberto Machorro wrote and spread these wise comments on
"Changing properties for "Inbox - Known"":
RM> What is the SmartBat? I haven't found documentation on it.
A notepad with s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:42:44 -0800, Roberto Machorro [RM] graced us with
these comments:
...
RM> I think that the "Inbox - Known" is a good idea, but I would rather
RM> have the known e-mails go to my "Inbox" and unknow
I might get corrected on this, but I believe that the "Known" filter
is just a preset way to do what was and remains possible using the
pre-existing filter set. You can easily set up one or two filters to
accomplish your desired result.
- Disable the Inbox-Known filter. Move the fol
would allow you to say "IF not in the address book, then direct
the message here. Positioning it at the end would allow you to filter
off all others that you want and the garbage falls out the bottom.
Monday, March 25, 2002, 2:42:44 PM, you wrote:
RM> I think that the "Inbox -
Hello Roberto.
At 2:42 PM on Monday, March 25, 2002 you wrote the following
about [Changing properties for "Inbox - Known"]:
Roberto> I think that the "Inbox - Known" is a good idea,
Roberto> but I would rather have the known e-mails go to my
Roberto> "Inbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 14:40:38 +0100 [ Fri, 29 Mar 2002], Marion [M] contributed this to
our collective wisdom:
...
M> Other question I couldn't find, what is the purpose of the
M> inbox-known?
It's a common folder created 'out of the box',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, March 29, 2002, at 5:40:38 AM PST, Marion wrote:
ACM>> Pegasus has the ability to reflow sender paragraphs when quoting
ACM>> them. What it did was to reflow you're quoted material, but
ACM>> unlike TB!, it doesn't recognise initialed quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:34:14 -0800, Melissa Reese [MR] wrote these
comments:
...
MR> One thing you may want to do, just to be compatible with the widest
MR> range of other people's mailers, is to use the "standard" quote prefix
MR> ("> ") instead of a
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:34:14 -0800 Melissa Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ACM>> Pegasus has the ability to reflow sender paragraphs when quoting
> ACM>> them. What it did was to reflow you're quoted material, but
> ACM>> unlike TB!, it doesn't recognise initialed quote prefixing. It
> ACM>> t
On Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:17:34 AM, Marion wrote:
MD>> Qualcomm seems to have lost interest in the program, making me
MD>> wonder what its eventual fate will be.
> To me too! Good to know I am not the only one ;-)
> Strange thing, I don't have these problems on my laptop, while using
>
esn't Ritlabs skip the whole idea of that
Inbox-known folder.. If they got any sense on this matter, they would
see how stupid it is.
1) degrading your inbox to a spam-folder.
2) the thing's name is too long and it just don't sound right.
3) you've got 2 folders with 2 blue arrows.
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote:
> Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
> "What is Inbox - Known for?"
>> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
>> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, you wrote:
DK> What is the logic for the "Inbox - Known" automatic filtering in
DK> conjunction with the address book?
DK> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
DK> through, and I suspect that the In
15-Jul-2003 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam
Just a thought about "combined measures"...
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS
blacklist
On Tue 15-Jul-03 12:52pm -0400, MikeD wrote:
> The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and they are
> spoofing your address so that (assuming, presumably, that you list
> yourself in your address book ) it is not as clear as it was. I
> recently had to take my address out of my a
Hello Dave,
> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
> through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
> it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
> Inbox-Known algorithm to debug this issue.
Are you using any filter
Hello neurowerx,
> I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
> again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS
> blacklist feature).
Because, for example in my case, I'm getting a 99.71 accuracy with
POPFile alone which, as you probably know,
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
