Looks like I fixed my name on KNOL by changing my name on Google.
Ed
Jed Rothwell wrote:
That was a piece of cake. See:
http://knol.google.com/k/jed-rothwell/cold-fusion/2zjj2hvn3qzi5/2#
As you see, I plagiarized the whole thing from Cold Fusion for Dummies
by Ed Storms. (Ed originally
Steve, I suggest you consider that the visa problems as well as other
issues might be a factor in not having a final agenda. A draft agenda
has been sent to the speakers for their input. Would you rather have an
agenda that is incomplete or has to be seriously changed, as was the
case with the
should not be blamed on the organizers. It is better taken up
with the Bush administration.
Regards,
Ed
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:38 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
Steve, I suggest you consider that the visa problems as well as other
issues might be a factor in not having a final
How many airplanes need to hit a tether or kite to bring the method to
an end? How many up and down cycles will the tether survive? How many
lightening strikes on a wet tether must occur before the tether breaks?
In short, this method has no hope of being practical.
Ed
Jed Rothwell wrote:
be a real problem for airplanes.
Ed
Terry Blanton wrote:
Certainly, no less practical than a space elevator.
Terry
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many airplanes need to hit a tether or kite to bring the method to an
end? How many up and down cycles
A better question is, How do people who make such stupid policy keep a
clearance? Thank heavens some people are willing to make these policies
known. Our leaders seem to have lost their rationality in an attempt to
get reelected. They will agree to anything as long as it doesn't make
them look
When evaluating the laser result, you need to take into account that it
does not work unless the cathode is coated with gold. Consequently, the
effect depends on how deep the laser energy goes. Does the effect have
any relationship at all to the properties of palladium?
Ed
Jones Beene wrote:
I hope you are right, Jed. But I can hear the response to any request.
I agree, evidence for CF exists, But you have no idea why or how it
works and you can't make it work very often. We have an energy problem
we need to solve right now using methods that are better understood.
So come
On Aug 29, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
I hope you are right, Jed. But I can hear the response to any
request. I
agree, evidence for CF exists, But you have no idea why or how it
works and
you can't make it work very often. We have an energy problem we
I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
came up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
Ed
On Aug 29, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
The republicans have sealed the dirty old man vote. Gov. Palin at
20:
And also the creationist
On Aug 29, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:57:30
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
came up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
Ed
Actually I thought it was a very
the few are getting very rich. This
is not what the founding fathers wanted. Obama may be inexperienced,
but he sees the problem and has proposed solutions. This is more than
be said for McCain et al.
Ed
On Aug 30, 2008, at 11:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Edmund Storms [EMAIL
, adroitly conforming to
reforms passed by Congress.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] DOM Vote
Unfortunately, the personal
I agree with both Horace and Jed, this is serious and should be
confronted at every level possible. The initial conflict appeared to
be motivated by simple professional jealousy. Now the conflict has
gotten more serious because a major university cannot set proper
standards for its
On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
snip
If flat earth is too extreme, even for biblical
literalists; but creationism is OK to teach, then I
would like to ask the various candidates who might
support 'creationism,' although there is only one of
that persuation, where do you draw
On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:32:23
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
behavior of the stock market and the government. The bigger
question,
is what does an individual do to protect themselves from this growing
A graduate student at a university would be crazy to write a letter
damning a member of the faculty unless he was sure of being protect.
This would be like a private in the army publicly criticizing his
commanding officer in a letter. This simply is not done. The fact
that such a letter
The obvious problem with the argument of whether to do something about
global warming always involves a basic error. The error is that if we
try to do something, it will result in economic damage. Actually, if
we invest in alternate energy, this will create jobs and keep more
money in the
Yes Robin, but why do the nonoil barons keep making this point?
Ed
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:08:25
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
The obvious problem with the argument of whether to do something
about
global
Good point Robin. Perhaps we should turn this around and use this as a
criteria of who is influenced by the oil barons. For example, Obama
made the point that development of alternate energy would put people
to work. Using this criteria, Obama is apparently not under their
influence.
Ed
invasion are
based on a
lie. How does that make you feel? Sad? Angry? There you go. Let's
use truth
and good science this time.
- Rick
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject
And you miss my point, Rick. My point is that it does not matter if
the warming is caused by mankind or not. We all benefit if we develop
alternative energy. If this means supporting ALGore, then suck it up
and get on with life.
Ed
On Sep 5, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
While all you say very well Nick is true and reasonable. Nevertheless
the basic issue is not addressed. The basic issue is that burning
fossil fuels is harmful for several important reasons, only one of
which is global warming. Therefore, we should make every effort to
phase out this
On Sep 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
snip
So, when the Arctic Ocean is free of ice and the last polar bear is
stuffed and placed in a museum, it will *STILL* not be obvious that
humans had any effect at all on the climate: The apparent connection
I hate to get involved in this cat fight, but when thermite is used,
it melts only a very local region which is blown away from the area by
the reaction. A molten pool of iron would not be produced. I suspect,
as others have suggested, that the huge energy of the collapse would
melt the
On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Ed -
You could be right - but the bottom line on it is that all we need,
all we have ever needed, is simply a thorough investigation which
addresses all the issues.
Why were we not afforded that for the millions already spent?
I suspect
, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to get involved in this cat fight, but when thermite is
used, it
melts only a very local region which is blown away from the area by
the
reaction. A molten pool of iron would not be produced. I suspect,
as others
have
You all would fail at solving murder mysteries. Consider the facts:
1. Diebold makes ATMs, which are secure. Therefore, they know how to
do a good job.
2. Diebold is owned by people who are strong supporters of the
Republican party. Therefore they have a self interest in gaming the
This book is not properly described. Actually, it is collection of
papers given at an ACS meeting. I'm glad to see it is available for
$175. The ACS wanted $400 to sell me 100 preprints of only my
contribution.
Ed
On Sep 11, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
online voting secure and cheat proof if anyone
is curious, it's not really hard.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You all would fail at solving murder mysteries. Consider the facts:
1. Diebold makes ATMs, which are secure. Therefore, they know how
Our belief is that a cluster of deuterons forms. Occasionally two
members of the cluster fuse. The energy is then proportioned between
the resulting alpha, which has too little energy to be detected, and
the members of the cluster. The amount of energy each member receives
depends on how
Yes, it is crazy. Such events are a sanity test of the people
reacting. Insanity and delusion are real pathologies of the mind that
are frequently ignored when such events are interpreted. People want
to believe so badly in magic that they will see whatever supports this
need. At this
of DNA errors? No, not a chance.
David
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it is crazy. Such events are a sanity test of the people
reacting. Insanity and delusion are real pathologies of the mind
that are frequently ignored when such events
Ah so, now my faith in the unique role of religion in creating
delusion is no long in jeopardy. :-)
Ed
On Sep 14, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
You guys are not paying attention to the source of this story- 'The
Onion' is spoof-central.
(Terry is teary-eyed LOL)
of research.
The power of identity can be harnessed for good or bad.
Harry
on 14/9/08 11:55 am, Edmund Storms at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I understand your point and I agree. Not just Buddha is
worshiped but Christ and many of the saints as well. This is
another human need, i.e
On Sep 17, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
snip
Had GM fired Lutz-the-Putz years ago, back when he was strongly
dissing the Prius and spouting the gas-guzzler SUV spiel (epitomized
in the Hummer, Suburban, Yukon, Escalade etc. legacy -- which is the
Lutz legacy of 10 mpg) ... and
Gold is up also because people are bailing out of paper money. The
financial system is in the precollapse stage and the crew is going
overboard.
Ed
On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Leapin' Lizards! The London palladium ETF is up 10% today:
In contrast, Toyota sold the Prius at a loss at first and provided a
very good insurance policy that covered any flaw or inconvenience,
including free oil change. A person had nothing to lose by trying out
the new technology. Meanwhile, by the time the Volt hits the market,
the Prius
A point you all seem to miss is that the ICE must be large enough to
move the car at normal speeds, including up hills when the batteries
are dead, in addition, it needs to have some extra power to charge the
battery at that time. Therefore, a small ICE will not work. For
example, the
environmental edition. Includes serious analysis of Prius
about halfway in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL9O1H9e1rA
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2008 17:49
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:GM Chevy Volt at CalCars
A point you all seem
On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
A point you all seem to miss is that the ICE must be large enough
to move the car at normal speeds, including up hills when the
batteries are dead, in addition, it needs to have some extra power
to charge the battery
On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
I have never seen this mentioned, but in principle the design
could be described as very de-coupled, or modular.
They are not calling it a 'hybrid' for a number of marketing
reasons,
Remi, you need to take into account what works. If telling the truth
and being objective and rational got a person elected, more
politicians would have these qualities. If the people voting were
educated and rational, better leaders would be elected. The present
system is the result of a
His prediction would be correct if nothing else happened. Now we have
two additional variables in play. The first is a world-wide
depression. This will reduce energy demand and reduce use of oil - for
a while. By the time this is over, new sources and effective
conservation methods will
by eating less crap. Nevertheless,
the effect will be an interesting experiment for us who only have to
watch.
Ed
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His prediction would be correct if nothing else happened. Now we
have two
additional variables in play
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ron Wormus wrote:
. . . a single sentence of thirty-two words, but it represents a
significant consolidation of power and an abdication of oversight
authority that's so flat-out astounding that it ought to set one's
hair on fire. It
I agree, Robin. The food industry has made money at our expense, at
least at the expense of people who don't do their homework. But don't
me started on this outrage. When trying to predict the future in order
to protect myself, I ask, how many basic mistakes at every level of
living can a
On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:05:37
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I hope the people who elected
and supported him are pleased.
[snip]
He was voted for by lots of people, but he was never elected, as
both elections
Good analysis Steven. I hope you are right.
Ed
On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
Since we are speculating on presidential outcomes I thought this might
be a good opportunity to share the opinions of a blatantly
unscientific and unverified source - particularly insofar as this
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:42 PM, thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms opined:
True, but small comfort. Nevertheless, this rigging would not have
been
effective if the election had not been so close. Now we have
another close
election, which demonstrates the total irrational thinking of at
Please Jeff, spare us the political propaganda. We get a belly full of
this from the candidates. The point you make is trivial and
irrelevant to the problem. The press is doing the job they are paid
to do. They provide information that we use to make a rational
decision if we are
For those who have not been following the news and do not have a fixed
opinion about the financial problems, let me add a bit of reality.
The collapse of the mortgage market was the event that started the
collapse but it was not the true cause. The big problem is the
derivative market.
On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:51 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
Sobering and provoking thoughts from Remi, Ed, and Terry. Gives me
the shudders.
I find it curious that the consumer credit card industry doesn't seem
to have been mentioned in this mess, or perhaps I missed that aspect.
Considering the huge
Actually, credit is essential in an active economy. For example,
suppose I want to start a business making widgets. Before I can get
any income from their sale, I have to buy the machinery and hire
people. This takes money up front, which must be borrowed. Once again,
this is not rocket
Hope this works Jed, or at least makes people aware.
Ed
On Sep 25, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://www.project10tothe100.com/index.html
I submitted an application to this project. Not expecting a
response, but anyway, I have covered this.
In the application form field
On Sep 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Remi Cornwall wrote:
Well, do you think it will happen?
No. Hopefully some of the people will spend some time either in jail
or trying to keep out of jail. Even this is not certain. We all know
that in politics, the bigger the lie the more it is believed
of all kinds.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Do do do doo. Do do do doo...
Actually, credit is essential in an active economy
On Sep 25, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Experts at the Naval Research Laboratory estimate that
cold fusion can be fully developed and commercialized for roughly
$300 million to $600 million . . .
[snip]
If my device works, it could be thousands of times
On Sep 25, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
At ICCF-14 another NRL person told me, we are one breakthrough away
from a practical device. . . .
No one is even close to a breakthrough until the mechanism is
understood.
Well, I think the gist of the NRL guy's
The choice is always the lesser of two evils. We never get perfection.
Obama has less baggage than McCain, he is smarter, and he has a better
plan. God only knows how well he will work out. People voted for Bush
and Nixon with high expectations and look what happened. Each
president does
On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:05:23
-0600:
Hi Ed,
[snip]
Evidence is growing for several mechanisms to be
operating. We know that tritium can be produced on occasion without
neutrons. Perhaps, the same
The power of government always grows. This is a fact of life just like
death and taxes. Complaining does no good and is a waste of time.
The voters slightly control the rate of growth if they pay attention.
Successful people find ways to use the system or to work under the
radar. Right
On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Remi Cornwall wrote:
Ed: what you say sounds cynical and jaded.
I suppose it does to someone who believes in the ideal function of
government. However, if you examine the actual behavior, you will find
that the number of laws always grow in number and
On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
The power of government always grows.
Except when it shrinks.
Of course some laws are repealed and some are no longer enforced
unless you get caught doing something that threatens the government.
Nevertheless
. However, I do
get testy when people complain and suggest cures without the slightest
idea what disease is being treated. If you were a doctor, your
patient would have died long ago.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 19
I doubt that any argument would change your mind, Thomas. Given your
expressed values, I expect you voted for Bush. Are you happy with this
vote? Has your life improved? If it has, then you are one of the few
lucky people who would certainly like the good times to continue. If
not, why
an opinion. However, in my life, I have
found this approach does not work very well. How has this approach
worked out for you?
Ed
What you wanna do? Change the name of the country too?
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 20:27
Actually, only the Supreme Court can answer this question and they
show no interest in doing so. The cause of the problem is obvious to
anyone who has looked at reality. Many mistakes were made, but each
has been identified and attempts will be made to apply a correction.
Of course, the
On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Jeff Fink wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 4:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC News of the bailout
Actually, only the Supreme Court can
In case anyone was confused about what is happening, here is a good summary.EdMONEYANDMARKETS»Emergency EditionSaturday, September 27, 2008YOUR BEST SOURCE FOR THE UNBIASED MARKET COMMENTARY YOU WON'T GET FROM WALL STREET[«] Money and Markets 2008 ArchiveView This Issue On Our Website [»]Emergency
Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 4:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC News of the bailout
Actually, only the Supreme Court can answer this question and they
show no interest in doing so. The cause
Yes, 4th line first word.
Ed
On Sep 27, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Did you see the word 'forced' in my post?
Terry
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on, get real. No one is forced into the stock market this way.
Pass
book accounts
. A price is always
paid for ignorance.
Ed
Terry
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, 4th line first word.
Ed
On Sep 27, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Did you see the word 'forced' in my post?
Terry
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Edmund
was quite inflated for the
DOW?
Terry
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Edmund Storms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, 4th line first word.
Ed
On Sep 27, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Did you see the word 'forced' in my post?
Terry
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Edmund Storms
Of course steel gets soft as it is heated. Blacksmiths would be very
disappointed if it didn't. The role of any magnetic transition is
irrelevant. Have people completely lost their common sense. The
towers came down because the steel became too weak to support the
weight. I wish people
Who benefits?
Russia - We are stretched too thin to respond to their actions.
China- We need their money and are willing to sell our companies cheap.
Military-Industrial-Complex- The bigger the threat, the more they make.
Europe - The weaker we are, the less competition we are for them.
Newman could prove his claims so easily if he simply used conventional
methods and concepts to measure the power produced by his machine.
Instead, he insists on speaking nonsense. As any engineer knows, the
rate that a shaft turns has only a slight relationship to the power
being applied.
Israel is surrounded by enemies who hate it more than they hate us.
In addition, Israel could not survive without our military protection
and the money the taxpayers and the American Jews donate. The country
is not energy independent and is not productive enough to be self-
sufficient.
On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Stockholders have just voted. The bailout was extremely important to
the financial health of the country, or so they apparently believe.
---
NEWS ALERT
from The Wall Street Journal
Sept. 29, 2008
The Dow Jones Industrial
the
proper political or religious views, the agenda was designed to allow
the market to do whatever it wanted, and the laws he pushed favored
the rich and powerful. Now, people see the scam for what it was and
are rebelling.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL
True, but the margin is by only one vote in the Senate the last time I
looked. Nevertheless, neither party wants to take the rap for this.
Fortunately, enough thinking people are resisting the proposal of the
administration. Personally, I don't care what reason they use. The
plan as
Everyone agrees some kind of repair is needed. This is obvious. The
issue is what form this repair should take. An increasing number of
experts and ordinary people are realizing that the Paulson Plan is not
form the repair should take. Unfortunately, the administration
panicked and put
Actually, Bill Bonner shares your basic attitude toward government,
except he is a better writer and has researched the issue in depth..
Ed
On Sep 30, 2008, at 3:09 AM, Remi Cornwall wrote:
Sure looks like hate speech to me… You sure you want these guys
being leaders of the free world?
Well, for those who are still interested, the market is recovering
nicely. However, while the stocks that are most at risk from the
immediate problems are going up, the stocks that are expected to
suffer from a recession are continuing downward. In other words, the
basic market does not
tend to be a bit
speculative, but I see no obvious reason to disbelieve this one.
Edmund Storms wrote:
Well, for those who are still interested, the market is recovering
nicely. However, while the stocks that are most at risk from the
immediate problems are going up, the stocks
We now know how the system failed to work properly. How about applying
a little simple logic to a few facts? Application of simple logic to
the system a few years ago would have clearly predicted the outcome,
which many people successfully did. These are the people who made sure
they were
On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
6. As a result, stagflation will come again. The Obama administration
will look a lot like the Carter administration.
It might resemble the New Deal, if things get worse and Obama is
decisive. Or the Hoover
On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:Edmund Storms wrote:6. As a result, stagflation will come again. The Obama administrationwill look a lot like the Carter administration.It might resemble the New Deal, if things get worse and Obama is decisive. Or the Hoover administration if he is
Jed, I think you and Steve miss the main issue here. The discussions
held on CMNS are not secret, but are private. Suppose I invite a
group to my house to discuss cold fusion with the understanding that
the discussion would not be made public. Would it be right for an
uninvited person
inconvenient.
The basic issue is trust. Do we trust Steve or do we not trust him?
If not, as you say, such people are eventually frozen out.
Ed
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed, I think you and Steve miss the main issue here. The
discussions held
Has any one noticed that Palin cannot complete a logical thought to
its logical end without injecting random ideas? This way of thinking
is similar to the unscripted Bush. Do we need another Saturday Night
Live character?
Ed
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
OrionWorks
to be about 10% logic, McCain seems about 50%
logic while Obama is nearly 95% logic. We shall see which form of
thinking has the genetic upper-hand in the population.
Ed
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
Has any one noticed that Palin cannot complete
On Oct 4, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
Ed,
You would demonstrate your intention to communicate without
hostility by refraining from suggesting what you think I do or do
not understand.
Rather than continue a polemic with me, perhaps you would be so kind
as to explain to me
On Oct 4, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your reply.
As for the advantage to the CMNS list to maintain privacy, this is a
requirement for open, frank and sometimes critical discussion. For
example, I would want to be able to tell a person that his data is
wrong
On Oct 7, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested
against
every Presidential election back to 1860, and which has correctly
predicted every election since it was developed (that's six out of six
predictions made in advance
To any one who might be interested, Steve quoted me in the latest
issue of NET as follows:
For example, LENR researcher Ed Storms, retired from Los Alamos
National Laboratory, recently discouraged me from reporting all of the
key facts of LENR research. He wrote this to me in an e-mail
On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Whoa -
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if
they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
In this case, the owner of Diebold was a strong supporter of the
Republicans. This requires the Democrats to use other
On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:36 AM, thomas malloy wrote:
Jed Rothwell opined;
It is utterly absurd for McCain or any other politician to cite
ACORN as a threat to democracy
The Acorn people have gone out of their way to register people who
don't have a right to vote. I don't understand why
I'm confused. I was under the impression that the NaH was the catalyst
required to form the hydrino. If this is true, what is the role of the
Reney nickel?
Ed
On Oct 23, 2008, at 11:00 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Mike Carrell:
Remember this: Raynal-Ni is a trade name of Grace. In the
Jones,
While speculation is underway, I would like to add my own. The Mills
criteria for a catalyst is the energy that is required to remove an
electron from a level to infinity, i.e. the ionization potential.
However, this can only occur in a gas. In a solid, the electron never
goes to
201 - 300 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
