Bug#1041013: RFS: woof/20220202 -- File sharing utility through http protocol

et/package/woof/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/woof/woof_20220202.dsc Changes since the last upload: woof (20220202) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. Regards, --

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Greg Harris

Congrats Greg! Well deserved From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 07/10/23 12:18:48 UTC-4:00To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Greg Harris Congratulations! On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:17 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > > Congratulations, Greg. > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:13 

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal

, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal

Barry, I did a quick review and comparison for changes. Overall, it appears this document is more clear in key specific areas but also more complex. At this point, DMARCbis is about Local Policy, System Administrative choices and suggested guidelines, codified and/or new. As such, I

Re: [Koha] hourly fines not calculating

ha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha -- Hector Gonzalez ca...@genac.org ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DMARC's auth=dkim+spf tag

> On Jul 3, 2023, at 10:06 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > >> Anyway, discussing whether spf+dkim verification can mitigate DKIM replay >> belongs to the ietf-dkim list. (In case, it could also be expressed outside >> DMARC, for example by an additional DKIM tag.) > > I do agree with this, yes. >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

A small follow up about my DMARC view: > On Jun 30, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Hector Santos > wrote: > > Overall, imo, it is never a good idea to exerted changes on domains with bis > specs, requiring them to change their current DMARC record to reinforce the > security level t

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD?

Great question. I’ve been around since the beginning as a very strong DKIM Policy advocate, watching everything, my dumb attempt to summarize: 1) The idea of “reporting” was considered a testing thing. Redundant,. DomainKeys and DKIM had -t test keys. I believed and others as well, felt

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 30, 2023, at 3:32 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:21 AM Jan Dušátko > mailto:40dusatko@dmarc.ietf.org>> > wrote: >> Scott, Barry, >> as far as I understand, SPF are historic technology, > > Not in any official capacity. RFC 7208 is a Proposed

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

Doug, this is Wildcat! SMTP - one of the oldest SMPT packages around. Summary here: Without some signal at wcSMTP about DMARC, SPF will most likely remain a hard rejection at WCSAP/SMTP (at RCPT state) before DMARC at DATA Background: Since 2003, out of the box, Wildcat! SMTP with add-on

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

+1 > On Jun 27, 2023, at 11:06 AM, Tobias Herkula > wrote: > > Signing That, nothing to add. > > -Original Message- > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 4:24 PM > To: Alessandro Vesely > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM,

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

Since 2003, here is my out of the box, Wildcat! SMTP with wcSAP and wcDKIM add-on support, mail flow: (Note: for the record, email is a small Part, but a supportive part for many customer operations) At SMTP, starting with connection 1) If Enabled, Check for DNS-RBL IP check, respond at step

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> If the DMARC spec makes that clear, I think we win. And recipients > can still do what they want: if DMARCbis goes out with "use DKIM only" > and a recipient wants to use SPF anyway, they can do that... just as a > recipient that decides to use best-guess-SPF in the absence of actual > SPF

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

for relaxing the original DMARC1 (RFC 7489) and also the current DMARC1-bis. — HLS > On Jun 24, 2023, at 12:17 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > On Fri 23/Jun/2023 20:13:27 +0200 Hector Santos wrote: >>> On Jun 23, 2023, at 12:52 PM, John R Levine wrote: >>> O

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

On Jun 23, 2023, at 1:54 PM, John R Levine wrote: > >> My understanding is that if `auth=dkim` then SPF would be ignored from the >> perspective of DMARC. So if a receiver sees DKIM is not DMARC aligned and >> only SPF is DMARC aligned then it would still be treated as a DMARC fail. > > That's

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 23, 2023, at 12:52 PM, John R Levine wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2023, Emanuel Schorsch wrote: >> I agree with John's point that dkim+spf doesn't make sense in the context >> of strict DMARC enforcement (I think it provides value for p=none domains > > Since the aggregate reports tell

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

ems of its own, as a band-aid. R's, John ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmarc mailing

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 22, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > My conclusion (it won't surprise you to learn) from this thread is precisely > the opposite. > > In theory, DKIM is enough for DMARC (this was always true), but in practice > it > is not. > > I don't think there's evidence of a

Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 22, 2023, at 1:08 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > >> I concur that this isn't really a problem for either working group to solve >> as part of a standard, > > Well, the part that the working group needs to solve is whether the > challenges of getting DKIM right are such that we need to

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 17, 2023, at 9:50 PM, John Levine wrote: > > It appears that Hector Santos said: >>> Can these senders not accomplish the same thing by removing the SPF record >>> altogether? >>> >>> -MSK, participating >> >> >> Is

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 17, 2023, at 8:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 2:40 PM Ken Simpson > wrote: >> FWIW, I'd like to chuck my hat in the ring on the side of removing SPF from >> the next iteration of DMARC. As the operator of an email

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 12, 2023, at 6:02 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > > On 9 Jun 2023, at 22:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> >> You were previously talking about inserting ">" before a line starting >> "From ", which is typically done on delivery when writing to an >> mbox-formatted mailbox file, because

Jami on Sony Xperia X

App crashes when hitting the make call button or video call button. Other aspects work well: text messages send/receive, photo send/receive, picture send/receive.

Re: Jami on Sony Xperia X

log attached On Sun, Jun 11, 2023, 13:46 Hector Espinoza wrote: > App crashes when hitting the make call button or video call button. > Other aspects work well: text messages send/receive, photo send/receive, > picture send/receive. > log_20230611_134826_1390526763.log Descrip

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

, are you wishing this now? Hector > On Jun 9, 2023, at 8:27 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > > Hector, did you not understand this?: > >>> We will *not* consider what should happen to >>> SPF outside of DMARC, and any discussion of that is *out of scope* for >>> this

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

> On Jun 9, 2023, at 4:41 AM, Barry Leiba > wrote: > > Repeating this one point as chair, to make it absolutely clear: > > The proposal we're discussing is removing SPF authentication from > DMARC evaluation *only*. We will *not* consider what should happen to >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

rewrite=1" option to mailing lists with appropriate permissions. This could potentially make it more palatable to modify the author's address, while respecting the hard-won email security principles. Thanks --- Hector Santos Santronics Software,Inc. ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

My #1 concern is how the bigger ESP is contributing to the delivery problems, causing chaos for business users and customer relationship problems with mail hosting provider I am seeing uncertainty and inconsistency among different receivers with ESP gmail.com seems to be the most aggressive

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Hello El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió: > Hector Oron (2023-06-07): > > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64 > > (be) and cdrom targets and test that. > > > > Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable wit

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Hello El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió: > Hector Oron (2023-06-07): > > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64 > > (be) and cdrom targets and test that. > > > > Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable wit

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

. Thanks for your support. On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 12:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi, > > Hector Oron Martinez (2023-06-07): > > We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel > > module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

. Thanks for your support. On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 12:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi, > > Hector Oron Martinez (2023-06-07): > > We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel > > module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230526 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: tpear...@raptorcs.com, zu...@debian.org Hello, We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could you please consider the following

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230526 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: tpear...@raptorcs.com, zu...@debian.org Hello, We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could you please consider the following

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-25920) Allow receiving updates of CommittableSummary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17729290#comment-17729290 ] Hector Rios commented on FLINK-25920: - Hello all. To add more context to this issue, I was working

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17026) RBF: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17729013#comment-17729013 ] Hector Sandoval Chaverri commented on HDFS-17026: - [~hexiaoqiao] added PR for branch-3.3

Re: [Launchpad-reviewers] [Merge] ~lool/git-build-recipe:fetch-pristine-tar-tags into git-build-recipe:master

LGTM, +1 Tested on my local machine, the tags needed by pristine-tar are fetched correctly -- https://code.launchpad.net/~lool/git-build-recipe/+git/git-build-recipe/+merge/443942 Your team Launchpad code reviewers is requested to review the proposed merge of

Re: [Launchpad-reviewers] [Merge] ~lool/git-build-recipe:fallback-on-pristine-tar-checkout-failures into git-build-recipe:master

Review: Needs Information great work, some questions Diff comments: > diff --git a/gitbuildrecipe/deb_util.py b/gitbuildrecipe/deb_util.py > index d0a..4724de6 100644 > --- a/gitbuildrecipe/deb_util.py > +++ b/gitbuildrecipe/deb_util.py > @@ -68,11 +69,20 @@ def

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17026) RBF: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17728021#comment-17728021 ] Hector Sandoval Chaverri commented on HDFS-17026: - [~hexiaoqiao] would you be able

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17026) RBF: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17727661#comment-17727661 ] Hector Sandoval Chaverri commented on HDFS-17026: - [~elgoiri] I added a patch for branch

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-17026) RBF: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hector Sandoval Chaverri updated HDFS-17026: Attachment: HDFS-17026-branch-3.3.patch > RBF: NamenodeHeartbeatServ

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Koha 22.11.05 released

I see this behavior in two unrelated installations.  Both with overdues. On 5/27/23 17:47, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: Update using the packages. El sáb, 27 may 2023 16:37, Hector Gonzalez Jaime escribió: Sorry, I didn't copy the list: Hi, it is strange, I was testing in english

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Koha 22.11.05 released

using the packages. El sáb, 27 may 2023 16:37, Hector Gonzalez Jaime escribió: Sorry, I didn't copy the list: Hi, it is strange, I was testing in english, anyway, koha-translate does not list english as it is the default language, and doesn't let me update

[ceph-users] Re: BlueStore fragmentation woes

ing weeks. I can probably get the script done partway through doing this, so I can see how the distributions evolve over a bunch of data movement. > > > Thanks, > > Igor > > > On 28/05/2023 08:31, Hector Martin wrote: >> So chiming in, I think something is definit

[ceph-users] Re: Recoveries without any misplaced objects?

On 29/05/2023 20.55, Anthony D'Atri wrote: > Check the uptime for the OSDs in question I restarted all my OSDs within the past 10 days or so. Maybe OSD restarts are somehow breaking these stats? > >> On May 29, 2023, at 6:44 AM, Hector Martin wrote: >> >> Hi, >

[ceph-users] Recoveries without any misplaced objects?

17.2.6 (d7ff0d10654d2280e08f1ab989c7cdf3064446a5) quincy (stable) - Hector ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Re: BlueStore fragmentation woes

over time. I will do further analysis later with the raw bluestore free space map, since I still have a bunch of rebalancing and moving data around planned (I'm moving my cluster to new machines). On 26/05/2023 00.29, Igor Fedotov wrote: > Hi Hector, > > I can advise two tools fo

[Koha] Fwd: Koha 22.11.05 released

I'm certain there are no other missing messages in the logs. I'll try deleting koha and installing it without an upgrade to see if this still is a problem or if it needs overdue fines to be triggered. On 5/27/23 01:06, Mason James wrote: hi Hector this problem tests OK for me, on a 22.11.06

Re: [Koha] Koha 22.11.05 released

:28 PM Hector Gonzalez Jaime wrote: Hello, thanks for all the hard work! I just tried this version on a development server, and get a 500 error trying to check overdue fines, this is in the logs: "GET /intranet/circ/branchoverdues.pl HTTP/1.1" 500 Template process failed: undef error

Re: [Koha] Koha 22.11.05 released

europe.com ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha -- Hector Gonzalez ca...@genac.org ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-communit

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-17026) NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

Hector Sandoval Chaverri created HDFS-17026: --- Summary: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency Key: HDFS-17026 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-17026) NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency

Hector Sandoval Chaverri created HDFS-17026: --- Summary: NamenodeHeartbeatService should update JMX report with configurable frequency Key: HDFS-17026 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17026

[ceph-users] Re: BlueStore fragmentation woes

On 25/05/2023 01.40, 胡 玮文 wrote: > Hi Hector, > > Not related to fragmentation. But I see you mentioned CephFS, and your OSDs > are at high utilization. Is your pool NEAR FULL? CephFS write performance is > severely degraded if the pool is NEAR FULL. Buffered write w

[ceph-users] Re: BlueStore fragmentation woes

ave some clearer data beyond my hunch/deduction after seeing the I/O patterns and the sole fragmentation number :). Also would be interesting to get some kind of trace of the bluestore ops the OSD is doing, so I can find out whether it's doing something pathological that causes more fragmentatio

[ceph-users] Re: ceph Pacific - MDS activity freezes when one the MDSs is restarted

Hi, On 24/05/2023 22.02, Emmanuel Jaep wrote: > Hi Hector, > > thank you very much for the detailed explanation and link to the > documentation. > > Given our current situation (7 active MDSs and 1 standby MDS): > RANK STATE MDS ACTIVITY DNSIN

[ceph-users] Re: ceph Pacific - MDS activity freezes when one the MDSs is restarted

DS's rank only, you can't have one standby-replay daemon following all ranks. What you have right now is probably a regular standby daemon, which can take over any failed MDS, but requires waiting for the replay time. See: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephfs/standby/#configuri

[ceph-users] Re: ceph Pacific - MDS activity freezes when one the MDSs is restarted

rations? If *any* active MDS is down at least chunks of your filesystem will be down, which means clients will likely hang and stop doing anything even if the other MDSes are capable of serving subsets of the filesystem. Active MDSes do not randomly balance requests, they are each

[ceph-users] BlueStore fragmentation woes

I'm adding a few more OSDs and plan on doing the dance of removing one OSD at a time and replacing it with another one to hopefully improve the situation, but obviously this is going to take forever. Is there any plan for offering a defrag tool of some sort for bluestore?

Bug#1036623: libclang-common-16-dev: missing LLVM_VERSION_FULL in include path

Package: libclang-common-16-dev Version: 1:16.0.4-1~exp1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: zu...@debian.org Hello, On clang 16 the include files are broken links: $ ls -l /usr/include/clang/16*/include lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 17 de maig 09:25 /usr/include/clang/16.0.4/include ->

[ceph-users] Re: Slow recovery on Quincy

en Hu > Thank you for this, that parameter indeed seems completely wrong (assuming it means what it says on the tin). After changing that my Quincy cluster is no recovering at a much more reasonable speed. - Hector ___ ceph-users mailing list -- c

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Dead Koha Resuscitation

On 5/18/23 20:46, Bruce A. Metcalf wrote: On 5/18/23 21:35, Hector Gonzalez Jaime wrote: What does sudo koha-plack --start instancename Do? root@store:/usr/sbin# koha-plack --start library bash: koha-plack: command not found Which seems even more weird. Are the permissions wrong? You

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Dead Koha Resuscitation

n Library ___ Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha -- Hector Gonzalez ca...@genac.org ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Dead Koha Resuscitation

sts.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha -- Hector Gonzalez ca...@genac.org ___ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020123] [NEW] package keyboard-configuration 1.194ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete keyboard-configuration script post-installation devolvió el

Public bug reported: Choices: 1: Launch a browser now C: Cancel Please choose (1/C): 1 sudo: xdg-open: command not found No se han podido instalar las actualizaciones La actualización se ha cancelado. Su sistema podría haber quedado en un estado no utilizable. Ahora se llevará a cabo una

Re: [Koha] Fwd: Dead Koha Resuscitation

an The Augustan Library ___ Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha -- Hector Gonzalez ca...@genac.org ___ Koha mailing list ht

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures

to filter out failures with zero to low false positive. Diffusion by Osmosis! We don't have it today. It has been made more complex than it really is. I recommend to study the past work. Thank you. -- Hector Santos, CEO/CTO Santronics Software, Inc. On 5/15/2023 5:02 AM, Wei Chuang wrote

dosfstools for EFI partition?

Hi, Hopefully this is the right, or close enough, place ... Given that EFI is common, should dosfstools now be a standard package, so that we can fsck the partition when required? Happy to file as a bug, if I know what to file it against. Cheers, Richard

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

With the beta testing release, the hardware decoding is working for several recent Intel GPU architectures (Tigerlake, Aderlake, Raptorlake), so far, we only experienced a problem on Roadwell (Gen8) GPU, the oldest GPU generation we aim to support for this release, we will work to make it working

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

GPU . Intel® HD Graphics 5500 / Gen8 / Broadwell Chromium : 113.0.5672.24 hwacc/candidate Hardware decoding is not working ! Log: [46128:46128:0511/183800.564351:WARNING:chrome_main_delegate.cc(589)] This is Chrome version 113.0.5672.24 (not a warning)

Re: [VOTE] KIP-864: Add End-To-End Latency Metrics to Connectors

This will help us greatly. +1 (non-binding) From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 05/10/23 17:32:35 UTC-4:00To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-864: Add End-To-End Latency Metrics to Connectors Hi everyone, Bumping this vote thread. 2 +1 binding and 1 +1 non-binding so far. Cheers,

Re: The role of FOSS in preventing a recurrence of vehicle emissions scandals

Very good initiative Lars. It is possible (but very difficult in practice) to create a device, as "simple" as a open source open hardware counter, as "simple" as that, embedded in every sensor or controller, that counts how many times it was re-configured. Again, proprietary

Re: [Sursound] [Proposal] for HOA web-streaming-format

✔ WebM with Opus support Yes ✔ On Tue, May 9, 2023, 8:42 a.m. Hector Centeno wrote: > Hello, > > I use Edge on Android and Windows machines. This is what I get on my > Android device (latest Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra): > > Audio codecs > PCM audio support > Yes ✔ >

Re: [Sursound] [Proposal] for HOA web-streaming-format

support Yes ✔ WebM with Vorbis support Yes ✔ WebM with Opus support Yes ✔ Best, Hector Centeno On Mon, May 8, 2023, 12:38 p.m. Stefan Schreiber wrote: > Ammendment: > > “EAC-3 (DD+) is natively supported by Edge and all Safari browsers.” > > I did a fast html5test (.com) on

Bug#1035515: [pre-approval] unblock: gdb/13.1-2.1

Hello, While I agree we should get this fixed on bookworm, I believe to be able to unblock a package, the package should exist in the archive. Since you have not uploaded the package yet, are you fine if I do a regular upload with the patch, then use this unblock request to add the package

Bug#1035515: [pre-approval] unblock: gdb/13.1-2.1

Hello, While I agree we should get this fixed on bookworm, I believe to be able to unblock a package, the package should exist in the archive. Since you have not uploaded the package yet, are you fine if I do a regular upload with the patch, then use this unblock request to add the package

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Add MLS/MLM subscription/submissions controls to DMARCbis

t to me. (yes, I see Ale's draft below) And IMO, I don't think we should hold up DMARCbis for that work. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast -Original Message- From: dmarc On Behalf Of Hector Santos Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 9:26 AM To: dmarc@ietf.org

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Add MLS/MLM subscription/submissions controls to DMARCbis

can continue as the 3rd party signer and also keep the From as is, unchanged, or 3.2) it can also consider to rewrite. If rewrite is performed, the signing domain should have a security that does not allow any Display Attack Replays with the now altered 5322.From identity. -- Hector Santos

[dmarc-ietf] Add MLS/MLM subscription/submissions controls to DMARCbis

> On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:42 PM, Douglas Foster > wrote: > > ... > > But I need to clarify whether I understand your point. What I am hearing is: > For the short term, mailing lists should refuse postings from DMARC-enforcing > domains. That position can be relaxed only if all

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Apr 30 06:00:04 2023

> On Apr 30, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > >  > > >> On 30.04.23 13:49, Hector Santos wrote: >> What is the count based on? Is the count the amount of mail created since >> the last date of this report which was 1 week ago? >> >&g

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Apr 30 06:00:04 2023

++--- 94 ( 100%) | 946980 ( 100%) | Total 25 (26.6%) | 200417 (21.2%) | Scott Kitterman 14 (14.9%) | 190300 (20.1%) | Hector Santos 12 (12.8%) | 81505 ( 8.6%) | Alessandro Vesely 9 ( 9.6%) | 102937 (10.9%) | Jesse Thompson 7 ( 7.4%) | 123062 (13.0

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

> Given that lists are expected to (A) continue making content changes, and (B) > continue accepting all comers, I think we need to embrace From Rewrite as a > necessary consequence of A and B. Unlike Hector, I don't have a problem > with From Rewrite because the act of altering

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt

Douglas, In general, you can’t impose or mandate TLS under PORT 25 unsolicited, unauthenticated sessions. You can do this with ESMTP AUTH a.k.a SUBMISSION Protocol (RFC6409) which is Port 587. Under this port, you can mandate more Authentication/Authorization and mail format correctness than

[dmarc-ietf] Proposed Updates for DMARCbis - Section 4.4.3 and New Appendix A.8

as the original submission to avoid potential Replay and Display Name Attacks. Please let me know your thoughts on these proposed updates and whether they can be integrated into the DMARCbis documentation. Best regards, Hector Santos ___ dmarc mailing

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

via ESP email. Therefore, rewrite can be described as BAD when used intentionally to break down DMARC security or GOOD when used to create DMARC secured distribution. Thanks -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmar

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-10.txt

if they wanted to ensure senders who honor those will use TLS. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast *From:* dmarc *On Behalf Of * Hector Santos *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2023 4:29 PM *To:* Scott Kitterman *Cc:* IETF DMARC WG *Subject:* Re: [dmarc-ietf]

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

ail system with 3rd party signer support as it was originally envisioned. Thanks -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-10.txt

> On Apr 26, 2023, at 3:50 PM, Scott Kitterman > wrote: > > I think it would be crazy in 2023 not to use STARTTLS is offered. +1 > Personally I interpreted it more as employ a secure transport and think > through if you really want to be sending the report if

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

On 4/26/2023 7:21 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On April 26, 2023 8:08:39 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: On Tue 25/Apr/2023 20:27:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: My recollection is that a general formulation that I proposed had at least some traction out of both groups: [some appropriate

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

On 4/25/2023 10:06 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On April 26, 2023 1:47:14 AM UTC, Hector Santos wrote: On 4/25/2023 9:06 PM, John Levine wrote: PS: If anyone was going to suggest we just tell people how to change their mailing lists to work around DMARC, don't go there. I don't follow

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

ctice on a different internet has shown when following #2, for an existing list with members with restrictive domains, they will essentially become Read-Only List members because any submission/reply by them will be blocked. -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com h

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definitely no Delegated authentication for Gmail

etf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two basic Issues to address to help complete DMARCbis

On 4/24/2023 7:22 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: On Sun 23/Apr/2023 19:20:06 +0200 Hector Santos wrote: On 4/23/2023 6:10 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: Meanwhile, digressions about ATPS and similar schemes can help casting some light on future evolution. From: rewriting cannot be the final

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 2004237] Re: Intel Raptor Lake-P support for intel-media-driver in jammy

It also works for the free version of intel media driver ubuntu@ubuntu-Latitude-7440:~$ sudo apt policy intel-media-va-driver intel-media-va-driver: Installed: 22.3.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 22.3.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 22.3.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 500 500

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 2004237] Re: Intel Raptor Lake-P support for intel-media-driver in jammy

bug fixed on Jammy with intel-media-va-driver-non-free package in proposed, ubuntu@ubuntu-Latitude-7440:~$ sudo apt policy intel-media-va-driver-non-free intel-media-va-driver-non-free: Installed: 22.3.1+ds1-1ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 22.3.1+ds1-1ubuntu0.1 Version table: ***

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two basic Issues to address to help complete DMARCbis

> On Apr 23, 2023, at 4:17 PM, Dotzero wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 1:20 PM Hector Santos > mailto:40isdg@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: >> >> With each year, that "temporary hack" becomes the new normal and it >> will be harder to clea

[dmarc-ietf] Two basic Issues to address to help complete DMARCbis

h a p=reject policy. I don't think the above will take long to do and I believe will help resolve the conflict. -- Hector Santos, https://santronics.com https://winserver.com ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

[Bug rtl-optimization/109585] Carla/sord miscompiled with -O2 on ARM64 with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585 --- Comment #15 from Hector Martin --- The prior repro was too complex and depended on other environmental stuff (some other people couldn't repro it on arm64 either), so please ignore it. If the reduced repro triggers the issue, it's the same

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definitely no Delegated authentication for Gmail

a long time ago that the Internet that > Hector uses is very unlike the one the rest of us use, and it's not > worth arguing with him. > > That said, I really wish the chairs would shut down the trolls. They may > not think they're trolls, but they are having the classing trolling effect > o

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definitely no Delegated authentication for Gmail

> On Apr 22, 2023, at 12:58 PM, John Levine wrote: > > It appears that Jesse Thompson said: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> A DNS-based lookup, perhaps in the style of ATSP as this thread is >> describing, to query for not just domain-level authorization, but also >> potentially user-level

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Delegated authentication for Gmail

Here is an scenario I long envisioned with high-valued services implementing a DKIM Policy model. Example: bank and a new online banking customer: Bank: "For online banking we need an email address for secured private email communications." User: "hmm, user.n...@esp1-domain.com

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >