Messages by Thread
-
-
-
Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds"
A. Pagaltzis
-
Re: The benefits of "Lists are Entries" rather than "Lists are Feeds"
Robert Koberg
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Eric Scheid
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Thomas Broyer
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
A. Pagaltzis
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Henry Story
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
James M Snell
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Walter Underwood
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Peter Saint-Andre
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Walter Underwood
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Tim Bray
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Walter Underwood
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Eric Scheid
-
Re: "Top 10" and other lists should be entries, not feeds.
Dan Brickley
-
Atom for internal use? <link>, etc
blaine
-
Don't Aggregrate Me
James M Snell
-
Feed History: stateful -> incremental?
Mark Nottingham
-
Updated License and Expires Extensions
James M Snell
-
If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Bob Wyman
-
geolocation in atom:author?
Eric Scheid
-
OpenSearch and Atom Prototype
James M Snell
-
Where's the Registry of Link Relations?
Robert Sayre
-
FYI: Expires Extension Draft
James M Snell
-
Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard
The IESG
-
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.txt
Internet-Drafts
-
Extension spec updates
James M Snell
-
Feed History -03
Mark Nottingham
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]