Hi,
It looks like the IOS has given you the answer: Command rejected: One
or more ports is already configured as a trunk port.
And the documentation confirms that you cannot configure multi-VLAN and
trunk ports on the same 2900XL/3500XL switch. See:
Hi jon,
Thanks for reply. I can show this link to my boss.
Thanks Warms Regards,
Milind Tare
--- Jonathan V Hays wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the IOS has given you the answer:
Command rejected: One
or more ports is already configured as a trunk
port.
And the documentation confirms
dear n rf,
area you still in networking business, and are you a CCIE?
Just curious :)
Xy
- Original Message -
From: n rf
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: RE: how about ccie salary in US? [7:71143]
douglas mizell wrote:
not. I honestly cannot comment on the job
True, fairness is a must. CCIEs without much experience are rare in the
field percentage-wise in comparison, as no-nothing frat boys who drank
through college are aplenty. These chaps sure played good paintball, but
they were not good techs.
CCIEs with some experience are considered to have
Hi Group,
This is pertaining to FR Backup over ISDN
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/125/12.html#topic21
It may not help much to back up the main interface because you could
lose permanent virtual circuits (PVCs) without the main interface going
down. Remember, the protocol is being exchanged
Hi,
This might have something to do with the protocol design . I was
wondering whether all the connection-oriented / reliable protocols use
Windowing .
Can the group add elaborate on this please..?
TIA
Srivathsan A
Message Posted at:
I have a couple in production and ssl sticky does indeed work !!
Herlocker, Tim wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all. We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL sticky
works on them first
Thanks in advance!
-
Breif example... Your local T1 ciruit to your carrier is Up Up but.. when
you do a sh frame-relay pvc your DLCI shows INACTIVE. Hence why the ISDN
backup interface command does not take effect since the interface is still
up.. even though your frame-relay is not working. This can be caused to
Hi all,
We have a 3550-12T which is connected to 3 2950G-48-EI's via the GBIC ports.
When I access the cluster managment software on the 3550 is shows the 2950s
as unknown devices, if I access the CMS on one of the 2950s it shows me the
correct switch (but only the one) and I'm able to manage
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
CCIEs with some experience are considered to have college
equivalent
experience and training as it pertains to technical know-how,
knowledge
that has proven to be crucial in the survival of a few
companies that I have
worked in. The companies did not care very
you need to configure dialer watch for this to work correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Salvatore De Luca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 June 2003 09:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FR Backup Over ISDN [7:71332]
Breif example... Your local T1 ciruit to your carrier is Up Up
I have a MSFC on a 6509 that I am firing up for the first time. The 6509 is
running CAT-OS (Hybrid Mode).
I have defined several VLAN interfaces on the MSFC, and now must create a
specific access-list to limit only a certain source and port address to
reach each of these VLAN's. This
Mark E. Hayes wrote:
Ok Sen. McCarthy,
Your response is Bolshevik, get it? ;) All I'm talking about is
taking
care of people who took care of you. As an employee I have an
obligation
to do x amount of work. I always do more than that, it's a
pride thing.
I want the business I work for
Hi
I have just setup a IPSEC tunnel between to routers and tunneling a source
address of 192.168.50.1 going to a host on router B
172.x.x.x./24
Everything works with the current configs given below. But I want to change
the acl 101 on router B from using a class A mask
to something like a class C
Thank you all !!!
I really appreciated.
Annlee, I meant major which relate to the important ones for
the ccie written.
-rbx10
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71344t=71276
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Group,
To answer the question regarding Knowledgenet from thread below...I've
recently purchased a few courses from Knowledgenet - cvoice, dqos and evodd.
It's basically 6 weeks of self/web-based study with hands on lab scenarios
and sample exam questions for each class. My first course was
You can 'session' to the MSFC without previously configuring anything (like
IP address) on it, right? So it can't be telnet... :)
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 12:22 PM 6/25/2003 +, Dave C. wrote:
I have a MSFC on a 6509 that I am firing up for the first time. The 6509 is
running CAT-OS (Hybrid
Zsombor Papp wrote:
At 10:21 PM 6/24/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi,
You can actually buy unidirectional PVC service? What do people do with
that?
Curious,
Zsombor
Everybody - thank you. Sorry for this late answer, got stuck with a problem
in a remote site for some time.
From what you said I'd think one provider is planning to give us a full BGP
feed (but doesn't charge very much), while the other requires a smaller
router because they want to filter most
Yes you are correct that backing up the main interface will not help
if the remote side of the frame connection goes down, you will still be
up up to your local switch. since I think 10.2 or 3 you can backup the
subinterface, it recognizes the PVC being down and will initiate you
backup
I recently used the knowledgenet BSCI course. I used it as a supplement to
my studying and not my main source. it was very good in explaining the
technology and hands on labs just not sure that it covered all of the
details needed to pass the exam.
I signed up for the exam at www.computer.org this
The access-list will have no effect. Consider this. Can you seesion
to the MSFC when it has no configuration on it?
Dave
if somehow you do wedge yourself, the switch console x command is
your friend.
Dave
Dave C. wrote:
I have a MSFC on a 6509 that I am firing up for the first
i have this topology into my POP:
two 6509( with MSFC2) which are connected with two juniper. The default
route of sc0 is ip_address of MSFC2, while the MSFC2 speaks with juniper
with OSPF process. The juniper originate the default always ad so the MSFC2
receives the default by Ospf (External
Are they required to use windowing (apart from the obvious window size == 1
case)? No. Do they usually use windowing (for performance reasons)? Yes.
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 07:25 AM 6/25/2003 +, Srivathsan Ananthachari wrote:
Hi,
This might have something to do with the protocol design . I was
Thanks for the reply, but this doesnt work
I have the more specific acl and even created a LOG to syslog and its
matching correctly but doesnt work
any ideas
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 15:35, Robert Perez wrote:
I would do your more specific ACL entry and make sure your inverted mask is
I would do your more specific ACL entry and make sure your inverted mask is
correct such as 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255. Once you do that then issue the
following commands to reset the tunnel and force a renegotiation.
Clear crypto ipsec sa
clear crypto isakmp sa
That should do it...
-Original
Greeting,
The problem has been solved which wrong information was provided to me by
the satellite service provider:
They have two different default gateways, one of those gateways is very slow
and other one is very fast, so I have replaced the old default gateway with
the new one, the browsing
According to Cisco's website, using the session command is what they call
accessing the MSFC from the switch CLI using a Telnet session. However,
you can access the MSFC from the console port using the switch console
command, which Cisco describes as accessing the MSFC from the switch CLI
directly
Hi All
I have got a 350 AP and a 350 PCMCIA. Now with a open auth i authenticated
myself to the AP and when i try to pin the AP , I cant and when i try to do
the AP and PCMCIA troubleshoot via the tool u get with the PCMCIA package ,
am not able to ping to te AP . anyhelp from people around
thnx
Actually I think I answered my own question. I believe that it does telnet,
but uses a system default Loopback address (127.0.0.x). When I session
over, it shows that I came from 127.0.0.y.
Any thoughts...?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71356t=71340
Good Morning!
Statement 1:
In general - businesses are not well known for being altruistic in their
hiring compensation practices.
Statement 2:
Any good manager would be rather foolish to not appreciate, and compensate
accordingly, a hard-working and presumably valued employee. (S)He would
also
Well, this issue has been resolved with the help of Cisco! Here's a quick
run-down of what happened:
The MSFC2 on the 6509 switch was booting into boot mode because there was
only one image in bootflash (the boot image). I couldn't copy a main image
to bootflash using the copy sup-slot0:
What does traceroute show from the backbone to sc0 in both cases (when it
works and when it doesn't)?
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 02:04 PM 6/25/2003 +, riposi alessandro wrote:
i have this topology into my POP:
two 6509( with MSFC2) which are connected with two juniper. The default
route of sc0 is
AhhhThat just turned on a small light bulb for me. So you have
uiniderectional service but you configure it for diferent paths to and
from. I have seen a similar installation and I just figured the design team
had gone insane. now it makes sense. I like this explanation better.
David
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
Thank you all !!!
I really appreciated.
Annlee, I meant major which relate to the important ones for
the ccie written.
You don't have to know any RFCs for CCIE!? I've talked to quite a few CCIEs
who don't even know how TCP works. Afterall it's just payload in a packet
That does sound odd. Are you saying that, without the static
default, in your routing table you have a gateway of last resort but it
doesn;t work unless you statically define it on the MSFC?
Dave
riposi alessandro wrote:
i have this topology into my POP:
two 6509( with MSFC2) which
Thanks to the reply
Tom,
That idea was great. I am afraid I would have a problem because the number
of servers.
Bridging on ppp seems to have a problem: just one Vlan (bridge-group) per
interface.
Two links on Cisco explains EoMPLS. It seems to solve the problem but I can
not find an example
Srivathsan Ananthachari wrote:
Hi,
This might have something to do with the protocol design . I was
wondering whether all the connection-oriented / reliable
protocols use
Windowing .
No, a lot of connection-oriented protocols and a lot of reliable protocols
don't use windowing. There
Hy,
but uses a system default Loopback address (127.0.0.x). When I session
over, it shows that I came from 127.0.0.y.
Any thoughts...?
you are right :-) It does use a telnet-session. If you use an ACL on
your vty's, you can include/exclude the 127.0.0.x range to allow /
reject
Yes, I agree that the session command uses an internal telnet session.
Cisco's documentation says using a Telnet session, but I believe they
didn't go into enough detail!
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:55 PM
To:
douglas mizell wrote:
Hi,
I don't normally participate in threads like this
but I could not
resist. Everything posted so far is probably correct and
necessary and would
apply generically to any job hunt. I have my lab scheduled for
October
(first attempt). I started this
At 5:01 PM + 6/25/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
Thank you all !!!
I really appreciated.
Annlee, I meant major which relate to the important ones for
the ccie written.
You don't have to know any RFCs for CCIE!? I've talked to quite a few CCIEs
who don't even
I found the sense dubious at the time ;-) but it was how the customer wanted
to do it...
Annlee
David Vital wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AhhhThat just turned on a small light bulb for me. So you have
uiniderectional service but you configure it for diferent paths to and
from.
This is NOT the sort of thing that belongs on an IETF mailing list,
because it's vendor specific. That being said, it's relevant here.
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:15:59 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List
Sender: Mailing List
From: Sina Mirtorabi
Subject: Re: Clarification on Cisco OSPF network
A lot of list newbies probably don't realize that many list old-timers read
the messages via e-mail. The messages arrive as they are sent or posted.
They are essentially sorted by time rather than topic. They are not grouped
by subject in any way. They use a synchronous, connectionless, stateless,
Okay, this is getting really old, really fast. When responding to a post,
PLEASE QUOTE WHAT YOU'RE REPLYING TO! The number of unintelligible posts is
increasing and some simple quoting would help immensely.
Perhaps the issue is that if you use the web-based board to post a quote
does not happen
At 02:48 PM 6/25/2003 +, Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
According to Cisco's website, using the session command is what they call
accessing the MSFC from the switch CLI using a Telnet session
Not using a telnet session, rather from a telnet session. To appreciate
the difference, consider what the
Zsombor Papp wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:33 PM 6/24/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Aaron Ajello wrote:
This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked
a couple people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
If I've got two frame relay spoke
I agree. I was going to rag about this the other day, but figured that many
people on this list already think I bi*ch too much about other things! :-)
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grump, grump, grump
If everyone would post the new text at the top, I'd be happy...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 6:34 PM + 6/25/03, annlee wrote:
I found the sense dubious at the time ;-) but it was how the customer wanted
to do it...
Annlee
I never cease to be amazed at how less-than-well-informed-customers
demand crazy protocol changes. One of my favorites was to introduce
something along the
You made me try it... :)
I configured this on the MSFC:
access-list 100 deny ip any any log
!
line vty 0 4
access-class 100 in
and I was still able to use 'session' to get to it. Does anyone have
different experience?
FWIW, I also checked the TCP connections on the MSFC, and when a
The consensus among all corporate managers that I have dealt with is that
CCIEs cannot obtain their status with at least some real experience. That
is the consensus. Don't shoot me for it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent:
Team,
Is anybody having issues with their Content Engines having a lot of hard
drive failures? If you don't and you are using 507 and 560 series CE's
then can you provide me with what IOS you are currently using. We are
having tons of issues with these hard drives but Cisco at the moment
can't
I would appreciate if the posters would drive over to my house and read
their message to me, with accompanying gestures as appropriate.Not only
that, but maybe fix me a glass of ice tea and some cookies. It's hot out
here in Kansas, and cookies are hard to come by...
Kaminski, Shawn G
While we're on this topic, I just now found out there was an RFC that deals
with these issues. Here is a snippet from that RFC:
- If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the
Fe, fi, fo, fum, I smell the blood of another
undying thread! :)
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy
Cunctando restituit rem
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:29:34 GMT
Larry Letterman wrote:
Grump, grump, grump
If everyone would post the
Good information! Thanks for trying it out for us!
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 6509 MSFC [7:71340]
You made me try it... :)
I configured this on the MSFC:
Until it becomes such an unwieldy and nasty message... Sometimes I
take out some of the messages to avoid gargantuan replies.
Sometime I post inline to directly respond to certain viewpoints.
Otherwise you tend to get that nasty... um.. you didn't answer that
question syndrome.
I think
PIX People,
I am currently studying for Cisco's 640-100 MCNS exam and current study
material seems a bit thin. I have the Boson package, pretty good, a good
reference book that I have read about 3 time.
I am looking for good study scenarios where one has to step through setting
up a router,
At 8:29 PM + 6/25/03, Hemingway wrote:
The main differences being that
a.) the FR switch typically doesn't learn the DLCI numbers dynamically,
rather the service provider needs to configure it hop-by-hop, and
b.) the DLCI is not a globally unique identifier, like the MAC address in
I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boot
the device:
Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty
rommon 1
Can someone lead me in the right direction on what to do to get the boot
string set up properly?
Message Posted at:
Is there a slot card in the sup ?
If so , try to boot from slot0:
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ron
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Boot problem with new 6513
FWIW--
The 640-100 is being retired 30 Sep 2003, so you may want to consider taking
the new SECUR exam (642-501), which just went active 17 Jun. Granted, there
aren't a lot of materials published for it, but the published material for
MCNS is poor. My opinion of the exam is shared by a more
Found this a bit unusual... have a feel for why it works
this way, but figured I'd float this to the list for
thoughts...
Got two routers connected via a serial interface.
R1 is assigned 192.168.2.1/30 on its serial
R2 is assigned 192.168.2.2/30 on its serial
On R1, do a debug ip icmp
And
May find it very simple but could not find an accurate answer... Did not
have a lab switch
to try it out...
If i make a loopback (cross cable) connectivity between 2 ports within the
switch.
And having the STP enabled on the switch, what would be the status for the
ports...
I thought it is
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
The consensus among all corporate managers that I have dealt
with is that
CCIEs cannot obtain their status with at least some real
experience. That
is the consensus. Don't shoot me for it.
\
Those corporate managers are wrong. They may want to look up the term
fracking top poster
here - you happy now? ;-
Larry Letterman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grump, grump, grump
If everyone would post the new text at the top, I'd be happy...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\
I just don't believe that you can not
find a job if you are experienced and certified. It might not
be your dream job. it might not pay as much as you thought you
would be making now. And it might require you to relocate.
But there are jobs out there.
The issue is not finding a
Evans, Timothy R (BearingPoint) wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good Morning!
Statement 1:
In general - businesses are not well known for being altruistic in their
hiring compensation practices.
Statement 2:
Any good manager would be rather foolish to not appreciate, and
Shibu Nair wrote:
May find it very simple but could not find an accurate
answer... Did not
have a lab switch
to try it out...
If i make a loopback (cross cable) connectivity between 2 ports
within the
switch.
And having the STP enabled on the switch, what would be the
status for the
We have a Cisco VIP card plugged into a 7500 router. Every once in a while
the card just stops working and sometimes it gets stuck so hard that we
have to reload the microcode. The last we did that, the router crashed and
had to be reset (Ugly!). Well, it gets worse. After having to convince the
Ronnie
Ron wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boot
the device:
Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty
rommon 1
Can someone lead me in the right direction on what to do to get the boot
string set up properly?
Back in the days when baseball was understood to be the
ultimate expression
of American values, this may have been true. Take each
individual and weigh
his/her strengths and weaknesses, consider the overall value of
heir
contribution, and decide on that basis. These days, when
football
Shibu Nair wrote:
If the interface configured as passive under OSPF routing
protocol,
will there be any neighbor relationship establish on that
interface ?
No. Passive interface means it doesn't send Hellos, which it would need to
do to establish a neighbor relationship.
Priscilla
Yes, it's true that when you ping your own serial interface, the ping
actually crosses the serial link! You can also see evidence of it by
enabling debugging on the other side.
When I first saw this documented on a Cisco page, I submitted a
documentation bug report. :-)
I guess it's the only way
Curious wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I know that is a bad idea to configure a port with portfast when this
port
connect with other switch (loops can be created), but the question is:
could
I put a port connected to a router in portfast mode? A router is a layer 3
device
Hey there
Can the CISCO ATA-186 connect to more than one IP-voice network? I am
basically subscribing to telephone service through high-speed DSL with a
company called Vonage.
But I already have similar service from another company and would wish my
ATA-186 to be logged on to both the networks.
The only thing close to your story is the comment from Robert and Barbara
Thompson in _PC Hardware In A Nutshell, 2e_ where they comment that on a
device used as a server or any other PC that needs a large RAM, they always
use ECC memory (Error Checking and Correction) because (honest!) cosmic
n rf wrote:
Therefore when people say there are no jobs, they don't mean
that there are literally no jobs, they mean that the overall
quality of the jobs has declined dramatically (something which
I doubt anybody will seriously dispute) such that other options
look mighty attractive by
80 matches
Mail list logo
