I have a question for the group maybe some have had this issue.
My drive power on ssb seems to be down 10 db in comparing it to my 756pro. I've
made these tests on all bands so its not band related or antenna related.
On key down both rigs are in 5-10 watts of one another but on ssb the 756pro
Hello Everyone,
Just
a reminder that the regular Thursday night SDR Linux User Group on
TeamSpeak meeting is this evening (in the US) at 0200Z. This is a
chance to find out what is new with Software Defined Radio and
Linux. You can also find answers to questions that you may be having
about Linu
I made some more progress on an SDR-1000 console for Mac OSX. Though the
recording software I used to capture the movie messed up the sound, it
doesn't actually sound anything like that. Also it appears the audio is a
bit out of sync on the video too. Here is a quick video for anyone
interested:
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Know
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that the regular Thursday night SDR Linux User Group
on TeamSpeak meeting is tomorrow evening (in the US) at 0200Z. This is a
chance to find
out what is new with Software Defined Radio and Linux. You can also
find answers to questions that you may be having about
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that the SDR Linux User Group meeting is this evening (in the
US) at 0200Z. This is a chance to find out what is new with Software Defined
Radio and Linux. You can also find answers to questions that you may be having
about Linux. Stop by and join in.
Dan N4X
>Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>
> > I will stand by my previous statement: As long as Windows is the primary
> > Operating System for our customers, we will continue to
> > support/maintain/improve a windows Console. Again, this does not
> prevent us
> > from branching out into the linux and Mac world
Eric Wachsmann wrote:
> I will stand by my previous statement: As long as Windows is the primary
> Operating System for our customers, we will continue to
> support/maintain/improve a windows Console. Again, this does not prevent us
> from branching out into the linux and Mac world with a multip
Besides, there are a few of us that loath Linux.
Chris - AE6VK
-Original Message-
From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:34 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007
On 2/22/07, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did respond... privately. :) I'll summarize the main points below:
>
> I'm not sure I would say that we have punted on supporting other operating
> systems. Rather, I would say that we have chosen to stay in business.
> Whether Flex chose
world with a multiplatform
offering.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Covington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: Eric Wachsmann
> Cc: Jim Lux; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Fl
On 2/22/07, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that I would say that we (FlexRadio Systems) have chosen
> Windows. I would say, rather, that our customers have chosen it. Until the
> fact that the majority of our customers are primariy (and usually
> exclusively) Windows use
ED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Philip Covington
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:58 PM
> To: Jim Lux
> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
>
> I really can't blame Flex f
On 2/22/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
> >Jim Lux wrote:
> >
> > > And when will PowerSDR have the new dttsp v2.0 integrated?
> > > Does the Windows dttsp v2.0/PowerSDR v2.x still use PortAudio?
> >
> >That is entirely up to Flex.
> >
> >The dev
At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
>Jim Lux wrote:
>
> > And when will PowerSDR have the new dttsp v2.0 integrated?
> > Does the Windows dttsp v2.0/PowerSDR v2.x still use PortAudio?
>
>That is entirely up to Flex.
>
>The development trunk now supports OSX and linux, and as a
>consequence,
At 01:03 AM 2/22/2007, Kirb Nesbitt wrote:
>How tough would it be to provide different pan-adapter bandwidths
>independent of sampling rate?
The trick is more in the UI than in the backend. It would be pretty
straightforward to have a "spectrogram" type application taking the
feed from the anal
Jim Lux wrote:
> And when will PowerSDR have the new dttsp v2.0 integrated?
> Does the Windows dttsp v2.0/PowerSDR v2.x still use PortAudio?
That is entirely up to Flex.
The development trunk now supports OSX and linux, and as a
consequence, FireWire, LAN/WAN distribution of compressed audio,
an
Excellent Bob.
I thought that it would be held for
the big Dayton show. It will be nice
to give it a shakedown before Dayton.
Thanks again to you and the team who
have made this such an exciting shift
in amateur radio. The way this has
blossomed is testimony to the skill
and openness of the con
Jim Lux wrote:
> At 07:02 PM 2/21/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:
>> Jim L
>>
>> > What needs to happen is that the receive and transmit streams run
>> > continuously, in parallel, and the hardware is switched over from Tx
>> > to Rx (or reverse). The hardware switch can occur in well under a
>> > mil
At 07:02 PM 2/21/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:
>Jim L
>
> > What needs to happen is that the receive and transmit streams run
> > continuously, in parallel, and the hardware is switched over from Tx
> > to Rx (or reverse). The hardware switch can occur in well under a
> > millisecond (relay closing
How tough would it be to provide different pan-adapter bandwidths
independent of sampling rate? Running at 192000 would minimize latency
and refactoring of the display would provide the narrow band resolution
needed.
73,
Kirb - VE6IV
--
___
FlexRad
Kirby,
As much as I would have liked to run the FA-66 at 192K for minimizing
latency in the CW contest, I had to drop to 48K to get the 2 Khz panadapter
window. There is inadequate zoom range to get that small a panadapter
window at 192K. Maybe the Flex programmers could increase the zoom fac
Jim Lux wrote:
> At 06:42 PM 2/20/2007, Ned Johnson wrote:
>
>
>> Why not "resample" the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
>> fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
>> I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
>>
>> Ned, K1NJ
>>
>>
>> Kirb
Kirby,
Attempts to optimize latency by minimizing buffer size and maximizing
sample speeds reduces the filter to essentially a roll off of the
high and low ends of the audio spectrum. Without full QSK, there is
a wide latitude in the latency before the size of the DSP buffer
becomes a problem
Jim Lux wrote:
> > Or, why not refactor the dsp core (which I believe is in the
works)
> > so that changeover from Tx to Rx doesn't have to occur on a
buffer
> > boundary.
There's nothing to refactor. All that's required is to run two
instances of the DSP core, one RX, one TX. There would be some
At 06:42 PM 2/20/2007, Ned Johnson wrote:
> Why not "resample" the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
> fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
> I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
>
> Ned, K1NJ
>
>
>Kirb Nesbitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Why not "resample" the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
Ned, K1NJ
Kirb Nesbitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Charles,
while I fully understand the intent
Charles,
while I fully understand the intent behind sharpening up the filters for
battle in contests etc., I've found that in practice the radio continues
to exhibit excellent filter response using DSP buffer and sampling rate
settings which, while not absolutely optimized from a filter perform
e property sending at the same time you were receiving?
73, Guy.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles J Fontenot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:56 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
> I'm happy to report that the SDR-
I'm happy to report that the SDR-1000 does truly merit respect as a CW
contest radio. This past weekend I spent a couple of hours on 40 meters in
the ARRL CW DX contest to determine if the SDR would be able to "slice and
dice" through the typical contest bedlam. As I predicted, using the FA-66
I saw that on the 160 reflector. I sent a response to
Tom W8JI as follows. I think it is a worthwhile
discussion so that people get a clearer understanding
of different system strenghts and weaknesses:
Tom
Thanks for your analysis. One thing that is different
for the SDR-1000 on 160 compared t
Hi all
paste this message from TopBand forum:
73 Beppe
IK3VIG
===
I wouldn't want anyone to get the impression mixer noise is
less or non-existent on a SDR!!
All mixers generate noise, and the typical mixer (once we
move away from 6BE6 converter tubes) is so fa
Hello Everyone,
The audio file from Thursday's SDR Linux User Group meeting on Teamspeak has
been uploaded to HamSDR.com. The direct link for the mp3 file is
http://www.hamsdr.com/personaldirectory.aspx?id=497. My apologies to Craig
KC2LFI, the first 10 seconds of his conversation has "gone
Flex Radio SDR-1000, 1 year Old, Excellent w/ Delta 44 K6KDK 559-240-1579
===
also available:
US Tower HDX-572 MDPL w/ Motor Drive w/ Coax Arm w/ TRX 80 Raising Fixture
In Selma California. Pick Up Only, All factory refurb by US Towers 2 yrs
Be sure to archive the discussion for us lurkers. I suspect that Linux
will be more and more important for both Flex and the HPSDR groups in the
future as Vista slows the whole system and XP becomes unsupported. Some
"sporterized" OS would really be of future value. Thanks,
N0UU
__
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Babcock
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:35 PM
To: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR Linux User Group on TeamSpeak
Hi Everyone,
After
a week of sporadic internet connectivity and a couple of 18 hour work
days, I am back up and running with over 400 emails
Hi Everyone,
After
a week of sporadic internet connectivity and a couple of 18 hour work
days, I am back up and running with over 400 emails in my inbox. The
SDR Linux User Group meeting will be this evening at 0200Z. That is
9:00 PM in the East and 6:00 PM in the West. This evening our special
Also consider the FA-66 latency. Control for this is
accessed in the control panel. You may need to
increase the latency a little. You have to turn
off/on the FA-66 to get the change to take.
73 W9OY
Do you
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that there will be another SDR Linux User Group meeting
tomorrow evening at 0200Z on TeamSpeak. That is 9:00 PM on the East
coast and 6:00PM on the West coast. BTW, the plan is to have a meeting
every Thursday night (in the US) until further notice.
This week
see if it happens again.
Thanks again for the tremendous support.
Doug, VA3CR
www.va3cr.net
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wachsmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 31, 2007 4:49 PM
To: 'Doug McCann VA3CR'
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] SDR Audio Problem
Yo
ystems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Doug McCann VA3CR
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:54 AM
> To: Flex Radio Posting
> Subject: [Flexradio] SDR Audio Problem
>
> Sometimes when I use the SDR-1000, the a
Sometimes when I use the SDR-1000, the audio cuts out and then back on,
pulsing like that about once or twice per second.
I found a solution, which is to turn off PowerSDR and Turn off my Edirol
FA-66, then restart both.
It's not a big deal and doesn't do it often, but I was wondering if this is
Hi John,
You got the wrong Dave!!!
I have use the SDR on AM and have worked many guys. I have aways got excellent
reports. In addion, I have listen to myself on W4MO's SDR Remote Base and my
audio sounds GREAT! I have worked some big time AM guys and they cannot believe
it is an SDR.
No, I ha
(a)amsat.org .
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zo 28-1-2007 16:01
Aan: k5nu
CC: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: RE: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Mike,
Could it be that the tranmitter is oscilating wild sometimes, in that case
the frequency can be out of the usable band for the a
IL PROTECTED]; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: RE: [Flexradio] sdr swr
At 07:23 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, see in text
73 (sorry no spell checker on this system...)
groeten Peter
petervn(a)hetnet.nl <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; pa0pvn(a)hetnet.nl
<ma
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, and my apologies...despite your discussion (some of
which I agree with), I honestly can't tell if you agree with my position (or
not), but from your reply's tenor I suspect you disagree. My position
remains as stated below:
"In my opinion, the discussion really come
Check the following settings:
SPLIT=Unchecked
XIT=0
RIT=0
Sub Rx=Unchecked
Ext Crl=Not Enabled
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070128/76ef71fe/attachment.html
___
At 11:20 AM 1/28/2007, Jeff Anderson wrote:
>Hi Jim,
>
>If you believe that changing a signal generator's impedance from 50 ohms to
>100 ohms by adding a series resistor at the *generator* end of the
>transmission line that is matched to its load will make a 1:1 SWR suddenly
>2:1, or if you believe
One Word
Cables
either parallel port or between sound card and the
rig. I would look for RF and/or poor connections on
the cables. 9 times out of 10 if I'm having some
trouble it's the cables improperly seated or some
other cable problem
73 W9OY
___
Jeff, K6JCA
-Original Message-
From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 10:04 AM
To: Jeff Anderson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] sdr swr
At 07:36 AM 1/28/2007, Jeff Anderson wrote:
>Hi Peter,
Actually,
Mike,
You are welcome to borrow my SDR-1000 to see if the problem is your
setup or your box.
Give me a call at 361-549-7218 , my cell phone.
73, Larry K2LT
k5nu wrote:
> A question for the group. On the "transmit" tab I have the Tune set to Zero.
> I still have 35w output as I click the Tune
.org .
>
>
>
>--
>From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sun 28-1-2007 15:55
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
>
>At 03:08 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Mike
> >
> >
&g
At 07:36 AM 1/28/2007, Jeff Anderson wrote:
>Hi Peter,
Actually, that was my statement...not Peter's
>I believe your statement that SWR is affected by the generator's impedance
>is a common misconception. Actually, SWR, as is typically defined, is
>independent of generator (i.e. transmitter, in
ED]; Jim Lux; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: RE: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Hi Peter,
I believe your statement that SWR is affected by the generator's impedance
is a common misconception. Actually, SWR, as is typically defined, is
independent of generator (i.e. transmitter, in our case)
is an swr of 1:1.
Best regards,
- Jeff, K6JCA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 7:23 AM
To: Jim Lux; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Jim, see in text
73 (sorry n
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Anderson
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 10:26 AM
To: k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Mike,
Here's an experiment to try: unplug, at the SDR, the audio cable fro
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of k5nu
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:08 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] sdr swr
A question for the group. On the "transmit" tab I have the Tune set to
Zero. I still have 35w output as I click the Tune button. Is that normal?
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 28-1-2007 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
At 03:08 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Mike
>
>
>
>What is still wondering me the most is that when the SWR is close to
>1, the transmitte
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 28-1-2007 14:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Peter, I appreciate your reply to my message. I am very nearly ready to sell
the SDR and move on. It has driven me crazy. I have sent it to Austin twice,
but they can't seem to find an
At 03:08 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Mike
>
>
>
>What is still wondering me the most is that when the SWR is close to
>1, the transmitter impedance
>
>should not have any influence on the SWR.
Actually, no.. think about this... what if the Transmitter output Z
were 100 ohms... You'd
o a call on Monday.
73,
- Jeff, K6JCA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of k5nu
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:08 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] sdr swr
A question for the group. On the "transmit" tab I have th
A question for the group. On the "transmit" tab I have the Tune set to Zero.
I still have 35w output as I click the Tune button. Is that normal? Also on
my external wattmeter, the power out in the "Tune" position, is very unstable.
It will "flutter" back and forth by as much as 25-30 watts.
By the way, my current mode of operation is as follows:
Warm up the 756 Pro and amp. Listen on the sdr. When I find a dx station I
want to work, I switch to the Icom to work him. Just this morning I found
Zone 18 calling on 80 longpath. Switched to the Icom and worked him, then back
to th
Last night on the same antenna, swr on the external digital meter, 1.05 , power
out on Tune- 11w.
This morning without changing a thing, swr 3.8, power out on Tune 42w.
Of course putting another radio in its place, swr 1.0 as usual.
The puzzling part is that this happens so far only on one part
;
pa0pvn(a)gmail.com ; pa0pvn(a)amsat.org .
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens k5nu
Verzonden: zo 28-1-2007 5:56
Aan: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Thanks for all the replies to my original problem with the differing swr
readings between th
Thanks for all the replies to my original problem with the differing swr
readings between the sdr and other rigs. Of course like so many other things
about this sdr, it is not consistent. Tonight when I tried again, the swr on
the same antenna with the sdr is 1/1. Power level is 10 watts.
At 03:59 PM 1/27/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Interesting Mike, I like puzzles. To far away to see for myself. ;-)
>
>
>
>- What does the set on a 50 ohm dummyload?
>
>
>
>- Sure no crooked cables (lose shields are a common problem when you
>move cables).
Oh yeah.. been there, been bitten mor
At 01:21 PM 1/27/2007, k5nu wrote:
>Okay, here is the set up.On one 20 meter antenna I have, the
>following results are puzzling.
Is this with the tuner in or out on the SDR1000?
>Sdr "tune" clicked swr on independent swr meter - 3.00
So, in this scenario, you have SDR1000 Internal PA,
(a)amsat.org .
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens k5nu
Verzonden: za 27-1-2007 22:21
Aan: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Okay, here is the set up.On one 20 meter antenna I have, the following
results are puzzling.
Sdr "tune" clicked swr on indepe
, January 27, 2007 5:42 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
I wouldn't have a clue since I am a beginner. But to get an answer I
expect
you would have to diagram the setup and be specific about all the
components: antenna, feed line, swr meter make and model, com
I wouldn't have a clue since I am a beginner. But to get an answer I expect
you would have to diagram the setup and be specific about all the
components: antenna, feed line, swr meter make and model, complete software
and hardware sdr1000 configuration, etc.
>Okay, here is the set up. On one 2
Okay, here is the set up.On one 20 meter antenna I have, the following
results are puzzling.
Sdr "tune" clicked swr on independent swr meter - 3.00
Different radio, exact same path, placed in same place as sdr, swr 1.05. Only
diffrenece is radio connected to antenna. I test the same ant
Hi Chas,
everything working A.O.K. no changes in CW or digi modes in last 5 SVN
---
my config SDR-1000 + PA (external LDG AT-11MP ATU)
Delta-44 card (with RS Line Isolator on To-Line-In)
PowerSDR 1.9.x SVN 838...
Audio Buffers=512, DSP Buffers=512, M-Audio Buffer=512
Phil,
I noticed with the last SVN I installed, 838, I lost the connection
between the SDR and its keyer. I have a electronic keyer plugged
into the SDR hardware box. In theory when you key the electronic
keyer it keys the SDR. In the last SVN it stopped working twice, but
it restored when I
Philip Theis wrote:
>I used the SDR-1000 in last weekends contest and was very disappointed in
>the operation of the Virtual Serial Cable. It was constantly losing it's
>connection between the logging software and the SDR.
>
>
The most I have had to do in a long time is bring up Setup on the
I used the SDR-1000 in last weekends contest and was very disappointed in
the operation of the Virtual Serial Cable. It was constantly losing it's
connection between the logging software and the SDR.
It happened when ever there was a period of time when the transmitter was
keyed by the logger, wh
Ross,
Which are you getting? IQ or 1000?
My few comparisons so far show that the 1000 is a better receiver for
listening. Has many more features in the demodulator and noise
reduction section. I have spent the past couple of days doing A-B tests
listening to many AM and sideband conversati
I have a 1 watt sdr1000 that I would like to sell.Please contact off line at
kf9wv
@tls.net Thanks bGeorge
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070119/9862be1d/attachment.html
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that the SDRLUG will be meeting
on TeamSpeak this evening at 0200 UTC (9:00 EST, 8:00 CST, 7:00 MST and
6:00 PST). Our topics will be "Downloading and Burning ubuntu
Installation Disks" and "Installing a Dual-boot ubuntu and Windows XP
system."
Dan N4XWE
Hi Bill, yes there are two directions you can go using the SRD on 6 meters. I
elected to go the route of no transverter.
If you take this route, you need 1) a 6 meter preamp, (I use a DownEast 6 meter
preamp, $65.00) and 2) an amp to get you from .5 watts to whatever you need to
drive your amp.
Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
QST Technical Editor
Joel,
I just read your fine article in February QST on "Getting to Know
Your Radio" Dual Receivers, where you describe operation of main and
sub receivers on several HF rigs. You probably are not aware of the
dual receiver capability in the Software De
I have used several, but currently I run the audio from the Delta 44 to a
Realistic STA-870 stereo receiver/amp and into four speakers - two JBL and two
Optimus. I can choose pair 1 or pair 2 or all four. Very nice audio from the
SDR. I have used several amps - my other hobby is collecting/re
I ran the RTTY contest this weekend using my SDR-1000 and MixW and also ran
another station with an ICOM PROIII and WriteLog. In my experience the SDR
display made working the contest a dream. The ability to see the entire
band, and have MixW mark each station you have worked (as WriteLog does) i
Larry W8ER wrote:
> While the code
> developed by Eric and Bob and others, with our help, is public domain...
It is *not* public domain.
This is all copyrighted code. It is issued under a very specific
license, the GPL.
This is a very significant distinction. The code is still owned by
the aut
At 09:56 PM 1/5/2007, Larry W8ER wrote:
>Guys,
>
>This reflector is a valuable tool provided by Gerald and the guys at Flex
>for us SDR-1000 owners. I think using it to broadcast news of a "clone", and
>links to more information about it, is a disservice to them. While the code
>developed by Eric a
I will be more blunt in that I think it was a real blunder to eliminate the
1 watt version. It was explained as a "business decision" and in the same
breath the price of the 100 watt version was increased due to cost.
Certainly the same cost concerns must apply to the 1 watt radio since the PA
addi
I think that it might be more valuable for us
to know about clones. Local hams already ask
me about the SDR-1000. It is useful to know
about other SDRs; I can tell my friends the
advantages of getting the Flex-Radio hardware.
Mike - AA8K
Larry W8ER wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This reflector is a valu
Krister and Willy,
I totally agree with your opinions otherwise, but the copy or clone
should always in ALL respects be an improvement over the original
design. That the German copy is not. Obviously the worst mistake Mr.
Dipl.-Ing. H.-J. Kneisner made is that he did not know or understand
that Fr
On 1/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As for "publishing" the existence of the SDR-1000 clone, I did it because
> there was a lot of valid concern regarding the discontinuation of the 1W
> version. I thought this list is a forum for the exchange of ALL
> Flexradio-related
Hmm... definitely an "interesting" situation, perhaps a bit more complicated
than it seems at first. Could be some work for lawyers here as well. But what
kind of infringement might have been committed by the German company? I could
be wrong now, but I don't think Flexradio owns any hardware pat
Guys,
This reflector is a valuable tool provided by Gerald and the guys at Flex
for us SDR-1000 owners. I think using it to broadcast news of a "clone", and
links to more information about it, is a disservice to them. While the code
developed by Eric and Bob and others, with our help, is public
Has anyone ever interfaced a SDR-1000 to a PW-1 amplifier?
If so could you give details on the arrangement?
Thanks
Smitty WB3IAL
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061229/df
I would really like to start using my SDR1K with my Linux box, however
I currently have SUSE.
I know some of this has been discussed before, however a lot of it
didn't make sense to me at the time as I was very new to SDR. Can
someone tell me exactly what I need to get some sort of software
runni
Kevin
Down East preamp is at the shack. You need low loss feed line if over 100 feet.
If you put the preamp at the antenna, there are all kinds of issues.
If you need further info, please e-mail at my e-mail address on QRZ.
73, Dave, W9DR
-- next part --
An HTML attachm
Thanks Tim.
I have both the the Delta 44 and the Fa-66 Edirol. I have check
both against a very weak sig that is steady on 6 meters. My measurements
with the S meter, NOT the S Meter, Ho Ho, the real thing (dbm digital meter)
is .5 to 3.0 dbm better with the Edirol. I wanted to know an unbais o
Greg, there isn't a need to have a external relay but I did not want to
> use the RF keying of the TE amp along with the 1K amp relaying as a path
> to the SDR receive. (through all that cabling and relays)
>
> I want the receive signal get to the external receiver preamp then into
> the SDR rec
Greg, there isn't a need to have a external relay but I did not want to
> use the RF keying of the TE amp along with the 1K amp relaying as a path
> to the SDR receive. (through all that cabling and relays)
>
> I want the receive signal get to the external receiver preamp then into
> the SDR rec
Pat,
I had this issue with the Firebox. When I upgraded the firmware to
accommodate 96khz operation the problem went away. I hope you get this
resolved, I am also looking at getting the Edirol sound card.
WD5Y
Joe
> I have been using the flex for about 4 weeks, at times when using an amp
> with i
I have been using the flex for about 4 weeks, at times when using an amp
with it I will get an alarm on my power master meters indicating a high swr
alert. It seems to happen between voice peaks.
I have changed every piece of coax , connectors, antennas, but it happens
once in a while.
When s
Bill Davidson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I bought a SDR1000-1 yesterday, after reading everything I could find
> for the last few weeks. To say I'm impressed is an understatement. The radio
> has two serial numbers though, 0616-1360 on the Test results sheet on the
> inside and 0617-9310 on the
801 - 900 of 1334 matches
Mail list logo
