I thought you had to edit (or delete???) one file to get a menu to select
from.
I use Vista, but had three different types of the correct disks.
Rick Glazier
From: Thane Sherrington Subject: [H] Vista install question
Am I right in remembering that I can use any version of Vista to
install
On W7 media, you simply delete ei.cfg from \sources.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Rick Glazier
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:07 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista install
Thane Sherrington wrote:
Is there a way to have a batch file launch a second batch file at an
elevated privilege level? I have a batch file (named runme.bat)
that calls a batch file that does some registry changes, and I'd like
the runme.bat to call the second at an elevated privilege level
At 04:17 PM 06/07/2009, Jamie Furtner wrote:
Thane Sherrington wrote:
Is there a way to have a batch file launch a second batch file at
an elevated privilege level? I have a batch file (named
runme.bat) that calls a batch file that does some registry
changes, and I'd like the runme.bat to
I'm assuming that you mean standalone, not redist...
SP1 x86:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=B0C7136D-5EBB-413B-
89C9-CB3D06D12674displaylang=en
SP1 x64:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=874A414B-32B2-41CC-
BD8B-D71EDA5EC07Cdisplaylang=en
SP2
Hello Greg,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 3:03:18 PM, you wrote:
I'm assuming that you mean standalone, not redist...
Ohhh maybe my terminology was in error, no wonder I couldn't find
them. Thank you very much for your time and effort. I just wanted to
store them on my file server so I don't have to
Exactly!
--Original Message--
From: Joe User
Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
To: Greg Sevart
ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista SP's redist's?
Sent: Jun 8, 2009 6:04 PM
Hello Greg,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 3:03:18 PM, you wrote:
I'm assuming that you
I've just downloaded, installed and run it from the Google updater without
any problem (the fact it insisted on installing Chrome is a separate issue).
Using Vista Business 64bit on my laptop.
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
LOL, or GAY-lo as I tease kid my kiddies about here when they play the old xbox
version. After playing Crysis Stalker level of realism I have to laugh at them
playing 1999 Quake2 level graphics unrealistic cheesed-out game play. =)
Obvious start, lower all graphics settings (starting 1st
Comments in-line.
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:36 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Vista Permissions
I am running Vista 64 Home
You can right-click on the shortcut and select Run as Administrator (or set
the setting in the properties for the shortcut and run as admin). I think
that either way, it will make you enter the credentials of an administrator
if the current user is not one.
That does not work on some
...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:10 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Permissions
You can right-click on the shortcut and select Run as Administrator (or set
the setting in the properties for the shortcut and run as admin). I
admin account log in vista is NOT the same as in XP.
fp
At 07:09 PM 3/21/2009, Winterlight Poked the stick with:
You can right-click on the shortcut and select Run as Administrator (or set
the setting in the properties for the shortcut and run as admin). I think
that either way, it will make
-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:10 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Permissions
You can right-click on the shortcut and select Run as Administrator (or set
the setting
-in-Windows-
Vista.html
Eli
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:10 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Permissions
You can right-click
Hello yoga,
Wednesday, March 18, 2009, 10:30:37 PM, you wrote:
good morning sir,
i have installed network printer in xp machine,
My laptop windows vista home edition installed.
i tryed to connect the printer but one error msg appear.
The printer spooler was not running, restart the
Agreed that's what the apps do is superior but why couldn't they give
us couple of GUIs like they do for Windows. They must have known
people would resist anything that increased the learning
curve? Most of my clients who upgraded to XP had me set it up like
Win 95 aka now known as Windows
Ribbon takes a lot to get used to. I personally don't like it. I feel slower
with it.
The big problem is that you can't customize with it, you can't make
your own ribbon or icon your macros. After years of creating Macros
and menus to make my job go easier they are gone. It is not something
Don't play games so I can't help you much there, but the funny thing is that
most game incompatibilities with Vista64 aren't due to the game itself,
but the crummy anti-copying/DRM infections publishers feel they must
include.
That being said, your best resource for getting game-specific
At 10:59 AM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
Don't play games so I can't help you much there, but the funny thing is that
most game incompatibilities with Vista64 aren't due to the game itself,
but the crummy anti-copying/DRM infections publishers feel they must
include.
Thanks, Greg.
I know you are
Thanks, Greg.
I know you are enamored with Vista 64 but I have been struggling with
Vista 64 for months now and I keep thinking things are better and I
am going to see all the value in it... but I haven't. One thing is
for sure, I would not let Vista or Office 2007 anywhere near my
I have just built my Vista 64 box. In stalled Call of Duty - World at War
and it runs great!
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 1:43 PM
To:
Picking them up being productive with an app are 2 entirely
different things. I've O2k7 wish I never installed it. I wish I
had installed O2k3 instead.
I haven't tried it yet but will windows let you install both? I
thought I read somewhere that it wouldn't but I'm not sure.
, March 08, 2009 7:29 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] vista 64 and games
At 02:53 PM 3/8/2009, Greg Sevart typed:
For technical staff, Vista and O2k7 have been a complete non-issue. Even
the
non-technical staff (mostly operations employees) have picked up both very
quickly
...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:11 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] vista 64 and games
Picking them up being productive with an app are 2 entirely
different things. I've O2k7 wish I never
Picking them up being productive with an app are 2 entirely
different things. I've O2k7 wish I never installed it. I wish I had
installed O2k3 instead. Sure I can run the 2k7 version but I'm still
not as productive with it as I was with 2k3 that's after more than
a year of using it. IMHO
Things are getting better. It is becoming a mature OS.
Rick Glazier
From: FORC5
curious how that is working for ya ? I have that but am afraid to mess with it
due to the stories I read about drivers and such.
At 08:21 PM 12/17/2008, Bryan Seitz Poked
I agree. Although Vista is bloated compared to XP, it has become much more
mature and rock stable.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Rick Glazier rickglaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Things are getting better. It is becoming a mature OS.
Rick Glazier
From:
One would hope by the second service pack they actually get it working right :)
I haven't found any real problems with Vista (aside from a handful of
annoyances) but there still isn't anything to really make me recommend
it over XP.
Brian
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Rick Glazier
Yeah agreed Brian. XP64 is ROCK solid ( based on Win2003 kernel ) and I found
good drivers for everything I own.
Current setup:
Areca 2 port PCI-E Raid card for RAID1 OS disk(s)
6G of Triple Channel OCZ PC1333 Ramz
620W 3 12V rails Corsair PSU
Asus P6T Deluxe X58 motherboard
* Onboard sound is
how about backward compatibility ?
I have a couple of really old proggie I use all the time, one for envelopes.
Pretty sure these are 16bit, was a effort to get them to run in xp.
fp
At 09:22 AM 12/18/2008, Bryan Seitz Poked the stick with:
I tried Vista twice and not only did it feel
Unknown if really old (esp 16 bit) apps work properly. I use plenty of 32 bit
apps though and they work flawlessly.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:57:00AM -0700, FORC5 wrote:
how about backward compatibility ?
I have a couple of really old proggie I use all the time, one for envelopes.
Pretty
Ditto, but I also don't like the changes they made to Explorer.
That's one of my main complaints of Vista.
I haven't found any real problems with Vista (aside from a handful of
annoyances) but there still isn't anything to really make me recommend
it over XP.
Brian
Ditto, but I also don't like the changes they made to Explorer.
That's one of my main complaints of Vista.
I haven't found any real problems with Vista (aside from a handful of
annoyances) but there still isn't anything to really make me recommend
it over XP.
Brian
Well the only
.
lopaka
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:
From: Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Ultimate ?
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 8:22 AM
Yeah agreed Brian. XP64 is ROCK solid ( based on Win2003 kernel ) and I found
good
Yep. I use the Freeware nLite to strip stuff out of my Windows installs too
when I do the SP slipstreams. :)
Works like a charm.
--
JRS steinie**...@pacbell.net
Please remove **X** to reply...
I will switch to Vista once there are no activation issues, and when utilities
can strip
At 08:57 AM 12/18/2008, you wrote:
how about backward compatibility ?
I have a couple of really old proggie I use all the time, one for
envelopes. Pretty sure these are 16bit, was a effort to get them to run in xp.
fp
nothing in 16bit runs in vista64, I don't know about XP64... I read
that
Yeah nLite/vLite are AWESOME.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:01:36AM -0800, JRS wrote:
Yep.? I use the?Freeware?nLite to strip?stuff out of my Windows installs too
when I do the SP slipstreams.? :)?
Works like a charm.?
?
--
JRS steinie**...@pacbell.net
Please remove **X** to reply...
Using vlite is how I discovered the several hundred MB of unnecessary tablet
PC stuff that is part of every Vista install, including desktops.
Had a weird problem with the one time I did a vlite install. Somehow, it
corrupted the real administrator account. I was logged in as administrator
and
I use FF in my server with Vista, do not use it for much though except when the
family is on the main box.
there are a few annoyances for sure.
fp
At 10:23 AM 12/18/2008, JRS Poked the stick with:
Ditto, but I also don't like the changes they made to Explorer. That's one of
my main complaints
-bit boxes. XPLite only takes about 300
megs for the OS and is way faster without the bloatware.
lopaka
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:
From: Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Ultimate ?
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008
-unix.net wrote:
From: Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Ultimate ?
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 8:22 AM
Yeah agreed Brian. XP64 is ROCK solid ( based on Win2003 kernel ) and I
found
good drivers for everything I own.
Current setup
takes
about 300 megs for the OS and is way faster without the bloatware.
lopaka
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:
From: Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net
Subject: Re: [H] Vista Ultimate ?
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 8:22 AM
At 09:50 AM 12/18/2008, you wrote:
I will switch to Vista once there are no activation issues, and when
utilities can strip out all the unnecessary crap to streamline the
OS. I use XP64 and a custom Lite version of XP for non 64-bit boxes.
XPLite only takes about 300 megs for the OS and is way
Hello Jason,
Thursday, December 18, 2008, 11:47:56 AM, you wrote:
Well the only reason I can think of to recommend Vista is if your a gamer
and want DirectX 10. All the games I currently play are DirectX 9.0c so I
have no reason to switch from XP.
Are games faster on Vista with DX10?
--
Farcry 2 is the only one so far that runs better in DX10 than DX9.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTU5Myw2LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
Joe User wrote:
Hello Jason,
Thursday, December 18, 2008, 11:47:56 AM, you wrote:
Well the only reason I can think of to recommend Vista is if
vista has separate install media for 32 and 64 bits
the license key determines which version of Vista it is (Home Basic/
Premium/Business/Ultimate) but the media determines the bitness
(bittedness?)
On 18 Dec 2008, at 00:28, FORC5 wrote:
Does Vista in all it's wisdom detect 32/64 bit cpu
Single key, different installation media.
With Home Basic/Home Premium/Business retail versions, you can request the
alternate media from MS for a nominal S/H fee.
With Ultimate Retail, you should have both editions in the box.
With OEM/System Builder versions, you only get the one you
And I recommend installing neither ;) I'm rolling with XP64 these days as
Vista is a complete
failure!
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:39:20PM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote:
Single key, different installation media.
With Home Basic/Home Premium/Business retail versions, you can request the
alternate
curious how that is working for ya ? I have that but am afraid to mess with it
due to the stories I read about drivers and such.
thanks
fp
At 08:21 PM 12/17/2008, Bryan Seitz Poked the stick with:
And I recommend installing neither ;) I'm rolling with XP64 these days as
Vista is a complete
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Scott Sipe wrote:
I have a dell with a Q6600 processor and 2gb ram. It has 32-bit Vista Home
Premium.
Two questions:
1) Do I gain anything by installing Vista 64-bit on it? Is there an actual
performance difference?
Not sure, I went 64 just so I could upgrade memory
I have a dell with a Q6600 processor and 2gb ram. It has 32-bit Vista
Home Premium.
Two questions:
1) Do I gain anything by installing Vista 64-bit on it? Is there an
actual performance difference?
No. There are some applications that benefit from the extra general purpose
registers
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Winterlight wrote:
In the past I always have set up my drive
C = Primary 2GB FAT32 Boot.. where I have the boot files and MBR
then I have a logical drive with separate partitions that typically dual boot
XP1 on D
XP2 on C
I tried this as a trial run on my new setup with C
For Anti Virus and all the other gubbins, pretty much everything for Vista
is x64 compatible. Especially now that Vista has been out for so long.
XP64 was a bit of a waste of time, but Vista x64 can cope with pretty much
everything.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depending on the version of PM you should not be using it period. Assuming your's is
not one of the versions that screws up, I'd imagine it does not matter what the OS is
as long as it supports the filesystem type version.
Doesn't ADD allow you to make a boot cd? Could have sworn I have a TI
GParted or almost any of the LiveCD linux distros out there.
Jason Tozer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: 12 November 2008 13:36
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista 64 partitioner
I had a really bad
I am a big fan of the gparted CD. I've used it successfully on many Red
Hat boxes.
maccrawj wrote:
Depending on the version of PM you should not be using it period.
Assuming your's is not one of the versions that screws up, I'd imagine
it does not matter what the OS is as long as it supports
Depending on what you're trying to accomplish, you may be able to do what
you're looking for without any third party tools. Basic partition shrinking
and extension capabilities are built in to Disk Management in Vista. It does
have some limitations (it won't shuffle around data to allow you to
: Re: [H] Vista 64 partitioner
Well, Partition Magic 9 in DOS does support VISTA, I have used it
with Vista 32.Of course I am not suggesting running it in Vista.
After all, a NTFS drive is a NTFS drive. I just don't have much
experience with Vista 64 although I don't see why it wouldn't work
I had a really bad episode with Partition Magic a couple years ago where it
FUBARd a partition and I stopped using it. I've been using Acronis since
and really like it. If you can't use Acronis, I second Ben's recommendation
for Gparted.
---
Brian Weeden
Technical
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:28 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista 64 partitioner
Well, Partition Magic 9 in DOS does support VISTA, I have used it
with Vista 32.Of course I am not suggesting running it in Vista.
After all, a NTFS drive is a NTFS drive. I just
FW depot is a reseller, Oxford is a chipset manufacturer, the bridge board is likely
made by a 3rd party. Since FWD does not manufacture they have nothing to do with
the driver and likely lack even an educated TS department, hence the simpleton response.
Bottom line is that like the USB mass
of
the month, I will not be buying from them!
Jim
-Original Message-
From: maccrawj
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:37 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista FireWire support
FW depot is a reseller, Oxford is a chipset manufacturer, the
bridge board is likely
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista install lacking boot files
I found a BIOS update for my mobo and applied i t, then reset the CMOS
on the PC. Now the problem is even worse - it hangs for several
minutes on a blank screen after the DMI update and then loads Vista.
Once it gets past that it works fine
good and right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 7:06 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista install lacking boot files
I found a BIOS update for my mobo and applied i t
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista install lacking boot files
Okay this problem has returned. Vista crapped out on me after only a month
and I needed to do a fresh reinstall (kept rebooting everytime a DVD was
inserted or locking up every 15 min). So this time I pulled my RAID card
and only had my
to not boot from the HD.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 5:25 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista install lacking boot files
Okay this problem has returned. Vista crapped out
Okay this problem has returned. Vista crapped out on me after only a month
and I needed to do a fresh reinstall (kept rebooting everytime a DVD was
inserted or locking up every 15 min). So this time I pulled my RAID card
and only had my boot drive attachced when I installed. But on reboot it
I have Vista 64 with my Retail copy of Vista. It came with both versions.
Regards,
Tim The Beave Lider
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: dowbeave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, June 28,
Have you tried installing using a different HDD?
I'd be starting lower than a Vista reinstall by running the drive manufacturers
diagnostic CD doing a long DST.
Brian Weeden wrote:
Okay this problem has returned. Vista crapped out on me after only a month
and I needed to do a fresh
Different HD might be a good idea, or see if the manufacturer has a
firmware update for your HD..
We have also seen similar issues with new PC's we just started getting
at work. Our Image does not work right on the brand new ones unless
get into the BIOS and change the HD from AHCPI to
X86 and x64 editions are on separate discs. With Retail non-Ultimate
versions, for a small SH fee, you can request the other media from what you
bought (ie: if you bought Business x86, you can get Business x64--they use
the same keys). Ultimate edition retail box has both x86 and x64 DVDs.
Order
Thanks Greg.
At 07:31 PM 6/28/2008, you wrote:
X86 and x64 editions are on separate discs. With Retail non-Ultimate
versions, for a small SH fee, you can request the other media from what you
bought (ie: if you bought Business x86, you can get Business x64--they use
the same keys). Ultimate
Brian Weeden wrote:
See, this is the thing. I could understand it if it was a whole
entire module that had to be added on. But the code to freaking do
this is already in EVERY copy of Vista All you need to do is make
a modification to one DLL and a registry edit and presto - as many
Should be able to just give Home an Ultimate CD key and presto chango. I
think there is even a little thing withing Vista that allows you to upgrade
on the fly (so to speak).
Brian
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Anthony Q. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Brian Weeden wrote:
See,
I think he meant a free hack... grin
Rick Glazier
From: Brian Weeden
Should be able to just give Home an Ultimate CD key and presto chango. I
think there is even a little thing withing Vista that allows you to upgrade
on the fly (so to speak).
Yeah I know - not that I know of. I mean, bits and pieces here and there
like the multiple session thing but that's about it so far.
Brian
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Rick Glazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he meant a free hack... grin
Rick
Vista more aggressively precaches things than XP ever did, which will
give the illusion of things using more memory than they actually are ?
( the other issues I have no comments regarding however.)
On 16 Jun 2008, at 18:09, Brian Weeden wrote:
3) Memory usage. The HTPC boots up and loads
Okay I've only been using Vista for about 2 weeks on my HTPC and it's
got
several things that annoy the crap out of me:
1) Only 1 session allowed at once. This is a real killer for a HTPC as
I
need to be able to have it autologin to one session to show the HTPC
shell
(I'm using Vista
Issue 2:
Download EasyBCD and fix your MBR.
Issue 4:
I think this is one of those tweakable features you can disable via Folder
Options or Performance Vistual Effects.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Monday, June
I did download EasyBCD and did the MBR fix. Didn't work.
Brian
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 2:
Download EasyBCD and fix your MBR.
Issue 4:
I think this is one of those tweakable features you can disable via Folder
Options or Performance
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay I've only been using Vista for about 2 weeks on my HTPC and it's
got
several things that annoy the crap out of me:
1) Only 1 session allowed at once. This is a real killer for a HTPC as
I
need to be able to
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 12:11:01 PM, you wrote:
Just installed my first Vista system (Ultimate, using it for my HTPC) and
have a weird problem. The install process never copied over the boot files
- the system will not boot unless the install DVD is in the drive.
Otherwise it
yes it's a common problem. quite irritating.
http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=1
Grab EasyBCD and re-write the MBR to your hard drive.
On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:11:01 -0400, Brian Weeden wrote
Just installed my first Vista system (Ultimate, using it for my HTPC)
and have a weird problem. The
As Outlook? No, more like Outlook Express.
Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (WLMail)
--
From: Harvey Best [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did see that Windows Mail question pop up. If I go ahead and install it, does it work basically the same way as Outlook?
Outlook doesn't come with Vista. The only email program that
comes with Vista is called Windows Mail. If you prefer webmail,
you can just ignore Windows Mail. For example, if you want
your Hotmail to handle a MailTo link on Craigslist, use this fix:
I did see that Windows Mail question pop up. If I go ahead and install it, does
it work basically the same way as Outlook? To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:46:52 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
[H] vista web mail question Outlook doesn't come with Vista
Vista, hehe. Looked nice on the customer's HP laptop I
worked on last month but it
was tricked out hardware 64bit Vista ultimate. Only
thing I really did not like was
all the security popups x2+ and nothing was where I
expected it to be from XP.
There's always Thunderbird HotPopper which can
Check the firewall. There's at least one Vista update that seems to re-enable
it if it were previously disabled. Otherwise check that all is okay (network
discovery, file sharing, etc enabled) in the network center.
-Original Message-
From: FORC5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April
FORC5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
game is a foot.
afoot
a foot is twelve inches or five toes and a heel. ;)
Hope you get your Vista thing worked out.
Regards,
Al
all seem well, still looking for the firewall which is suspect.
thanks
At 05:48 PM 4/13/2008, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with:
Check the firewall. There's at least one Vista update that seems to re-enable
it if it were previously disabled. Otherwise check that all is okay (network
discovery,
Quite so Watson :-}
fp
At 05:57 PM 4/13/2008, Al Poked the stick with:
FORC5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
game is a foot.
afoot
a foot is twelve inches or five toes and a heel. ;)
Hope you get your Vista thing worked out.
Regards,
Al
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
What part of Right to
Dog Shit SP1, Good 'ol #2 served up steaming hot!
Bryan Seitz wrote:
Get yer hot fresh DOG SHIT here!!!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:45:25PM -0400, Bobby Heid
wrote:
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/03/18/windows-vi
sta-sp1-released-to-windows-update.aspx
Bobby
Get yer hot fresh DOG SHIT here!!!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:45:25PM -0400, Bobby Heid wrote:
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/03/18/windows-vi
sta-sp1-released-to-windows-update.aspx
Bobby
--
Bryan G. Seitz
When I was running Vista, I put SP1 on (grabbed from MSDN) and noticed
no performance benefit as well.
Thane Sherrington wrote:
So from what I'm seeing here, SP1 is not going to save Vista.
Hmm, that's contrary to the SP1 reviews I'd read...were these established
Pre-SP1 Vista machines, or clean installs of both?
The reason I ask is that SP1 clears Vista's SuperFetch learned behavior
cache, so it's re-learning from scratch. That could play a big role in that
test...
I personally
Meanwhile SP3 actually *does* speed up XP a bit and the idle memory footprint
is a little less. Go figure.
Vista = Windows ME part II
Pure garbage.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:08:01 -0400
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [H] Vista SP1 comments
I've been
Reason #`144 to stick with Windows XP if you can.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile SP3 actually *does* speed up XP a bit and the idle memory
footprint is a little less. Go figure.
Vista = Windows ME part II
Pure garbage.
Date: Wed, 5
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Vista SP1 comments
Meanwhile SP3 actually *does* speed up XP a bit and the idle memory
footprint is a little less. Go figure.
Vista = Windows ME part II
Pure garbage.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:40:19 -0600
Subject: Re: [H] Vista SP1 comments
No, SP3 does not speed up XP.
http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2007/11/windows-xp-sp3-yields-performance-gains.html
The test everybody references was comparing
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
