Re(2): Fwd: HTML printing

Jérôme, I'm printing directly from Powermail. DDV > >>This is how French text looks in the html mail message and in plain >>text: "je suis désolé, ça n'a pas marché avec la chambre à laquelle je >>pensais". >> >>This is how the mail loo

Re: Fwd: HTML printing

DDV wrote: >This is how French text looks in the html mail message and in plain >text: "je suis désolé, ça n'a pas marché avec la chambre à laquelle je >pensais". > >This is how the mail looks when printed and when viewed in web browser: >"je suis désolé,

Fwd: HTML printing

Hello, I'm still trying to solve this problem. This is how French text looks in the html mail message and in plain text: "je suis désolé, ça n'a pas marché avec la chambre à laquelle je pensais". This is how the mail looks when printed and when viewed in web browser: &qu

HTML printing

Hello, Recently I'm having trouble to print HTML messages, french characters end up garbled. é becomes é, ê becomes ê and so on. On screen it reads fine and when printing as plain text it reads fine as well. Any suggestions to print HTML as it should? DDV =

Fwd: Re(2): Copying HTML text

nston Weinmann PowerMail Engineering wrote: >Winston Weinmann wrote: > >>Increasingly I get HTML formatted emails that do not have a text >>version. It is very difficult to copy text from an HTML email in PowerMail. > >Yes, this is a hard to fix bug related to the use of W

Re: Copying HTML text

Winston Weinmann wrote: >Increasingly I get HTML formatted emails that do not have a text >version. It is very difficult to copy text from an HTML email in PowerMail. Yes, this is a hard to fix bug related to the use of WebKit in a Carbon PowerPlant application. It is usually possible to

Copying HTML text

Increasingly I get HTML formatted emails that do not have a text version. It is very difficult to copy text from an HTML email in PowerMail. The normal click, hold, and drag the cursor does not work to select HTML text. I can usually double-click and select one word, or triple-click and select

Script or filter for automatically deleting HTML attachment when forwarding?

Need a script or filter instructions I forward regularly to a group email in plain text. But if the original email came to me as HTML, then the HTML note is automatically attached to that note and I have to remember to delete it. Is there a script or filter for automatically deleting that HTML

Re: Re(2): HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

On 30 Nov 2011, at 2:24 pm, Winston Weinmann wrote: >> If you view the full headers for one of the "garbled" examples sent back >> to you by your correspondent, what mail client ("X-Mailer: ") and >> text encoding ("Content-type: text/*; charset=") are used in his message? > > Here's what

CTM support AWOL again: Re(3): HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

No support from CTM. This is incredibly frustrating. In some cases it is extremely embarrassing to send out poorly formatted mail. Because I don't know what will show up when someone receives a message, effectively I can't use HTML mail. Why did CTM even bother to add the feature?

Re(2): HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

had: X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01CC8B3C.19364F30" - Winston Ben Kennedy wrote: >On 29 Nov 2011, at 12:51 pm, Winston Weinmann wrote: > >> When I use PowerMail's "Rich Text&qu

Re: HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

On 29 Nov 2011, at 12:51 pm, Winston Weinmann wrote: > When I use PowerMail's "Rich Text" HTML format for messages some people > receive the message with odd characters inserted like this: Winston sent me an example directly (both as he sent out, and as forwarded back

Re: HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

On 29 Nov 2011, at 12:51 pm, Winston Weinmann wrote: > When I use PowerMail's "Rich Text" HTML format for messages some people > receive the message with odd characters inserted like this: Sounds like a discrepancy between the declared text encoding, and the actual on

Re: HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

like this is embarrassing. Help! - Winston Winston Weinmann wrote: >When I use PowerMail's "Rich Text" HTML format for messages some people >receive the message with odd characters inserted like this: > >"Our Associate Artists are contributing their time and tal

HTML/RTF messages have odd characters - how to avoid?

When I use PowerMail's "Rich Text" HTML format for messages some people receive the message with odd characters inserted like this: "Our Associate Artists are contributing their time and talent to for Cocoa and Carols. You can help by: Â Â - donating an interesting bottle

Re: Re(5): Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

On Sep 13, 2011, at 20:28, Winston Weinmann wrote: > Are there any other differences between Forward and Redirect? http://email.about.com/cs/usingemail/a/redirect.htm

Re(5): Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

gt;>OK, found out what the problem is with posting RTF messages to the >>PowerMail Discussions list. It was at the bottom of the response from >>the PowerMail Discussions list: >> >>>Your message could not be posted to the PowerMail discussions list because

Re(4): Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

>the PowerMail Discussions list: > >>Your message could not be posted to the PowerMail discussions list because >>the message contained HTML and the list does not accept HTML messages. >> >>For more information, you can contact the list administrator at: >> >&

Re: Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

d to the PowerMail discussions list because >> the message contained HTML and the list does not accept HTML messages. >> >> For more information, you can contact the list administrator at: >> >>CTM listmaster > > So the PowerMail Discussions list considers RTF as

Re(3): Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

OK, found out what the problem is with posting RTF messages to the PowerMail Discussions list. It was at the bottom of the response from the PowerMail Discussions list: >Your message could not be posted to the PowerMail discussions list because >the message contained HTML and the list do

Re(2): Fwd: Really need a way to forward HTML messages

to forward an HTML email. It is about a local arts organization that will close down in less than two weeks unless it gets immediate help. The message is a mess when read as text (lots of long ugly links). I have saved it as a web archive, and will send that. But it loses some of its impact

Re(4): HTML display no longer working in 6.0.6

Hi Mirko, thanks for your suggestion - I would not have thought of an interaction with Safari. And this indeed solved the problem. I deleted Safari, restarted and installed a new copy (5.0.3) and HTML display is working again. Thanks.Peter On Thu, Dec 23, 2010, Mirko Kranenburg wrote

Re: Re(2): HTML display no longer working in 6.0.6

Maybe you could try to reinstall Safari. I think PM builds its HTML display on WebKit installed with Safari, so this could clean up some bits that went astray?? Mirko On Dec 23, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Peter Lovell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010, Michael J. Hußmann wrote: > >> Peter

Re(2): HTML display no longer working in 6.0.6

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010, Michael J. Hußmann wrote: >Peter Lovell (plov...@mac.com) wrote: > >> I find that HTML display is no longer working for me in PM 6.0.6 (the >> final version). >> >> Is anyone else seeing this? > >Works for me; I didn't ob

Re: HTML display no longer working in 6.0.6

Peter Lovell (plov...@mac.com) wrote: > I find that HTML display is no longer working for me in PM 6.0.6 (the > final version). > > Is anyone else seeing this? Works for me; I didn't observe any changes in this area with 6.0.6. - Michael Michael J. Hußmann E-mail: mich...@mi

HTML display no longer working in 6.0.6

Hi all, I find that HTML display is no longer working for me in PM 6.0.6 (the final version). Is anyone else seeing this? I have HTML enabled in Preferences, and it's preferred if plain-text is also available. The small pop-up icon is there at the bottom of the Mail Browser and the me

HTML mail print out problem

Hello, I have a problem with the correct printout of HTML emails. Today I received a mail from a successful ebay auction. So I start to print these mail. The final outcome was incorrect. All lines are incorrect. If I switch back to text only mode the mail was print correctly. So what is my

Re: Strange rendering of HTML emails

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 6:31 PM, emac compellingly composed, painstakingly penned, then roundfiled a lyrical masterpiece of an email then hastily scribbled >Hello Jo and company, > >Here's another clue - the emails are originating from a Windows 2000 machine. I followed the suggestion that

Re: Strange rendering of HTML emails

PM, emac compellingly composed, >painstakingly penned, then roundfiled a lyrical masterpiece of an >email then hastily scribbled > > >>Ever since I upgraded from PowerMail 5 to 6, I have received HTML emails >>from one non-profit organization only to see a bunch of Chinese/J

Re: Strange rendering of HTML emails

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009, at 5:37 PM, emac compellingly composed, painstakingly penned, then roundfiled a lyrical masterpiece of an email then hastily scribbled >Ever since I upgraded from PowerMail 5 to 6, I have received HTML emails >from one non-profit organization only to see a bu

Strange rendering of HTML emails

Ever since I upgraded from PowerMail 5 to 6, I have received HTML emails from one non-profit organization only to see a bunch of Chinese/Japanese characters appear when viewed in PowerMail. They worked fine in PowerMail 5. - When I view the emails in text format, they are readable. - When I

Hint for viewing images safely in HTML Mail

Hi, all - I tried this hint: and it seems to work nicely with PowerMail. - Don

Re: HTML display in 6.0b3

Ben Kennedy wrote: >The issues with HTML messages described below still persist in 6.0.1b1. > >Functionally, the most severe bug is with the duplicated header text >being inserted into the reply. This will be fixed in the final 6.0.1. >I still don't understand why it is insu

Re: HTML display in 6.0b3

The issues with HTML messages described below still persist in 6.0.1b1. Functionally, the most severe bug is with the duplicated header text being inserted into the reply. -ben Ben Kennedy wrote at 4:43 PM (-0800) on 12/1/08: >Yall, > >The "simple header" addition in th

Re: HTML display in 6.0b3

Sean McBride wrote at 10:01 PM (-0500) on 12/1/08: >I suspect it has to do with the shiny new WebKit being use to render the >HTML, and the crusty old PowerPlant to do everything else. Yeah. So? Shift the origin of the WebView down a hundred pixels or whatever, and draw the headers, like

Re: HTML display in 6.0b3

Ben Kennedy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-12-01 7:43 PM said: >I still don't understand why it is insurmountable to render this in the >same way as for plaintext messages. Surely it is a separate view being >drawn in that case anyway? What is it about the HTML view that >prec

HTML display in 6.0b3

in quoting when the message is replied to. I still don't understand why it is insurmountable to render this in the same way as for plaintext messages. Surely it is a separate view being drawn in that case anyway? What is it about the HTML view that precludes drawing the same header at its to

Re: forwarding a message with HTML text + jpegs

age that contains a series of HTML captions in >the body of the email and a series of jpegs as attachments. > >The message displays fine on my screen when I open it: I can scroll down >and see each subsequent jpeg photo with the correct html caption >displayed to the right of it.

Re: forwarding a message with HTML text + jpegs

On Fri, Oct 10, 20082:14 PM, the following words from Ken Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ... >I receive a type of message that contains a series of HTML captions in >the body of the email and a series of jpegs as attachments. > >The message displays fine on my

forwarding a message with HTML text + jpegs

I receive a type of message that contains a series of HTML captions in the body of the email and a series of jpegs as attachments. The message displays fine on my screen when I open it: I can scroll down and see each subsequent jpeg photo with the correct html caption displayed to the right of it

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin wrote: >When one opens the message, one gets a blank window with an HTML >attachment. Opening the HTML attachment forces the opening of a web >browser application window containing the message. Other people have >noted that such messages open properly in Apple Mail and

Re: reason for HTML-only?

>However, some HTML-messages end up as attachments only, which is a big >problem IMHO. Some problems with this: > >? The PM built-search index won't contain the data as it's only >available in an external file. Thus, information in these attached files >won'

Re: reason for HTML-only?

C. A. Niemiec suggested: > >1. view plain text portion >2. view HTML portion >3. view HTML portion scrubbed to plain text > >#3 is HTML part minus tags. Links reduced to PowerMail's usual angle- >bracketed plain text style. The 3rd alternative is usually possible w

Re: PM6 hopes.. was:: reason for HTML-only?

Please add to my list of "Hopes" for PM6: * Ability to highlight & copy text in a html message. Dave N in reply to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Dave N's message of 10:40 AM, 8/24/08 >Since I have (finally) started to use the 3 pane view, I noticed that PM >doesn't allo

Re: reason for HTML-only?

>... better integration of HTML email. I don't want to >SEND HTML email -- and I control that, but receiving >it...please make it as easy as plain text... I think a third viewing option would fit the bill: 1. view plain text portion 2. view HTML portion 3. view HTML portion scr

Re: PM6 hopes.. was:: reason for HTML-only?

window to work on it. This is a minor complaint, but one easily fixed in PM6 perhaps. Along with the usual feature requests of: *"Normal" Printing (with a print dialog box, message headers, choice of html or text versions, etc) * the infamous html issues * Find/Replace function in the

Re(3): reason for HTML-only?

Although trying to deal with HTML email is not as smooth as it could be, MY major problem with PM right now is that when I configure PM to view HTML email, I get frequent crashes as a skim through these messages. It was REALLY bad when I installed Safari v4 beta - but even after I reverted, the

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin sez: >Ah, my mistake. Apologies. I have a summer head cold and clearly, I am >not reading things carefully enough. :) I sent out my last message before reading through the thread. Tried not to seem snarky, but may have come across that way anyway, especially after this had already wou

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin sez: >What are you talking about? RE-READ the part you quoted. I have >received some HTML-only e-mails that did NOT open in PowerMail. Not >often, mind you but more than once. What are you talking about? I responded to another message. Not yours. The original message said

HTML capabilities (was: "reason for HTML-only?)

Michael J. Hußmann said: >PM's just fine. I would hate it to turn >into a replica of one of the competing clients. Diversity is a good >thing, and certainly preferrable to following standards that aren't even >standards. Improving PowerMails HTML-capabilities is hardly

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Matthias Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Regarding the database, weather people prefer monolithic databases or > not, it doesn't matter. The current backup technology doesn't prefer > this structure. > > Same thing with priority and some other features. All mail clients do > support that stuf

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Richard Hart said: >Are you sure you meant to write that? I believe you might be >experiencing problems, but I have never received a message in PowerMail >that "cannot be displayed". What does that mean: "cannot be displayed"? Well, if the HTML-message ends up in an

Re(2): reason for HTML-only?

> Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to > choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a > pure text part as well? ... >As to the original question, I don't know, given that such messages are >more likely to be conside

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Am/On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:05:52 -0500 schrieb/wrote Michael Lewis: >Matthias Schmidt sez: > >>So yes, it gets more and more difficult t stick with PM. > >Can you not use the button at the bottom to switch to HTML view or view >the message in a web browser. If neither of those

Re: reason for HTML-only?

On Saturday, August 23, 2008, Michael J. Hußmann sent forth: >Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Exactly what I and others have written. > >This thread started with the question: > >> Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to &g

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Exactly what I and others have written. This thread started with the question: > Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to > choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a > pure text part as

Re: reason for HTML-only?

never received a message in PowerMail >that "cannot be displayed". What does that mean: "cannot be displayed"? > >Richard Hart > > Exactly what I and others have written. When one opens the message, one gets a blank window with an HTML attachment. Opening the H

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin wrote: >These messages cannot be displayed by PM >in any mode. I have received a few myself. Are you sure you meant to write that? I believe you might be experiencing problems, but I have never received a message in PowerMail that "cannot be displayed". What does that mean: "cannot be

Re: reason for HTML-only?

On Saturday, August 23, 2008, Michael J. Hußmann sent forth: >Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> You miss the point, I think. These messages cannot be displayed by PM >> in any mode. I have received a few myself. > >So far, this thread was about HTML-o

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin sez: >You miss the point, I think. These messages cannot be displayed by PM >in any mode. I have received a few myself. I don't think that point was made. The original message only asked about HTML-only messages not being sent with text parts. If they aren't formatti

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > You miss the point, I think. These messages cannot be displayed by PM > in any mode. I have received a few myself. So far, this thread was about HTML-only mails, and PM has no problems displaying HTML-only mails that I am aware of. There is an issu

Re: reason for HTML-only?

On Saturday, August 23, 2008, Michael Lewis sent forth: >Matthias Schmidt sez: > >>So yes, it gets more and more difficult t stick with PM. > >Can you not use the button at the bottom to switch to HTML view or view >the message in a web browser. If neither of those work

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Matthias Schmidt sez: >So yes, it gets more and more difficult t stick with PM. Can you not use the button at the bottom to switch to HTML view or view the message in a web browser. If neither of those work, than the email has crappy HTML code and it isn't PM's fault. -- Mich

Re: reason for HTML-only?

Am/On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:30:40 +0200 schrieb/wrote Rene Merz: >MB hat am Donnerstag, 21. August 2008 geschrieben: > >>Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to >>choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a >>pure t

Re: reason for HTML-only?

MB hat am Donnerstag, 21. August 2008 geschrieben: >Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to >choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a >pure text part as well? > Is stupidity a good reason for it? A 2004 study by AWeber.co

Re: reason for HTML-only?

I don't know, but I'm getting a lot of those. Some look like almost blank in Powermail, and I have to use Apple Mail to view them. It's getting harder to stick with PM now. CTM: Please hurry up with v 6! We need some important features, like being able to forward an (html) email

reason for HTML-only?

Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a pure text part as well?

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

On Saturday, June 21, 2008, MB sent forth: >Sean McBride said: > >>Did you look at his screenshots? There was an attachment. That's his >>point. I'll repeat his words: "PowerMail shows me a totally blank >>message with a html attachment, with >&

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Sean McBride said: >Did you look at his screenshots? There was an attachment. That's his >point. I'll repeat his words: "PowerMail shows me a totally blank >message with a html attachment, with >no provision for viewing the message. It's just blank. Lame."

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Michael Lewis sa såhär: >I'd prefer that email programs >didn't fix errors so that crappy email programs would finally die the >deaths they deserve. if the crappy email apps are made by Microsoft, they won't die. Mikael Technoids: PM 5.6.3 build 4504 sv / SpamSieve 2.6.6 sv | OS X 10.4.8 | Pow

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Hi Jérôme, Thanks for the explanation. It always helps to understand the problem. Whether we all like it or not, html mail is becoming more common, not less. So let's look forward to a solution. Would it be possible to let Webkit provide the services to view the html message within Powe

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Sean McBride sez: >The email had _two italicised words_ >and for that PowerMail needs to launch a 3rd Party application to show >the message. Lame. This happens to me all the time too. Are we sure that the email in question followed the proper protocols for HTML mail? I bet it didn

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Dave N wrote: >Look at the difference between the 2 programs viewing the SAME EXACT EMAIL. >PowerMail shows me a totally blank message with a html attachment, with >no provision for viewing the message. It's just blank. Lame. > >AppleMail shows me the message so I can read i

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

cheshirekat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-6-19 5:09 PM said: >Isn't your HTML showing as an attachment in PowerMail? Did you look at his screenshots? There was an attachment. That's his point. I'll repeat his words: "PowerMail shows me a totally blank message with a h

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Hi Cheshirekat, Only as an attachment. No way to view the message within PowerMail. Have to use a web browser to read the message. Dave N in reply to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), cheshirekat's message of 2:09 PM, 6/19/08 >Isn't your HTML showing as an attachment in PowerMail? > >On

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Isn't your HTML showing as an attachment in PowerMail? On Thu, Jun 19, 200812:22 PM, the following words from Dave N [EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ... >http://dave.sbamug.com/pmdisclist/PowerMail_msg.png -- "Let us be grateful to people who make us happy;

HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

Ok, this html mail thing is getting more annoying all the time. Even if I want to push the globe button in PowerMail, it is not always there because PowerMail does not always notice the message is in HTML format. Look at the difference between the 2 programs viewing the SAME EXACT EMAIL

Re: Forwarding and html mails (late response)

Ulrik Larsen - Utopian. sa såhär: >Could there be a point in the preferences where this can be adjusted, >whether or not the user wants to forward text or original message? Powermail doesn't author HTML-messages. As the (external) HTML-display engine is not the same in 3.x and 5.x

Forwarding and html mails

I was using PowerMail 3.x before upgrading to version 5.x and here, when forwarding a html message, the html part would be included in the new message, but in version 5.6.4 the html part is converted to plain text, with an insertion like ' Begin Forwarded Me

generate HTML mail

Anyone know of a mac application that can generate HTML messages without a pure message part? Mikael Technoids: PM 5.6.3 build 4504 sv / SpamSieve 2.6.6 sv | OS X 10.4.8 | Powerbook G4/400 | 1GB / 80GB

Re: Problem printing html messages

in reply to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Matthias Schmidt's message of 5:42 PM, 12/17/07 Dave said: >>>In addition, PowerMail will not print the message header info, so I'm >>>left with just the HTML message body and no printed proof of date or who >>>it came fr

Re: Problem printing html messages

he text message. > >You're not helpful at all. The open in the browser "solution" is obvious >and trivial. >The objective was to print the HTML message with the headers, not the >text itself. >What don't you use your brain yourself and actually read before you

Re: Problem printing html messages

t;solution" is obvious and trivial. The objective was to print the HTML message with the headers, not the text itself. What don't you use your brain yourself and actually read before you try and be "helpful"? And what's all this "you"? Did I start the thread? I think

Re: Problem printing html messages

Am/On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:32:07 +0100 schrieb/wrote MB: >Matthias Schmidt said: > >>open the html in your webbrowser. >>You can do so by choosing the little globe on the bottom of the window >>and then choose show in webbrowser. >>From there you can print the htm

Re: Problem printing html messages

Matthias Schmidt said: >open the html in your webbrowser. >You can do so by choosing the little globe on the bottom of the window >and then choose show in webbrowser. >From there you can print the html message. No big deal, always works for me. That does NOT solve the problem of

Re: Problem printing html messages

Am/On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:49:40 +0100 schrieb/wrote MB: >Dave N told: > >>I KNOW this has been discussed before, but the problem still exists, and >>it's really surprising that when dealing with a HTML message in html >>view that PowerMail won't allow a cho

Re: Problem printing html messages

Dave N told: >I KNOW this has been discussed before, but the problem still exists, and >it's really surprising that when dealing with a HTML message in html >view that PowerMail won't allow a choice of printers, and won't allow a >"preview" nor saving as a PD

Problem printing html messages

So I receive a HTML message (a receipt for a purchase), and I want to print it. I press "command p" and want to choose the printer, and check the "preview" to make sure it is just 1 page Nope! Can't do it! As I am waiting for the Print Dialog box to show up, the

Re: HTML-only to text conversion working now?

MB Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:41:11 +0100 >I it just my messages or has the long wished for HTML to text >functionality silently been implemented even on email source that is >HTML _only_ (that is no plain text multipart)? > >When I display HTML messages of such HTMl-only message

HTML-only to text conversion working now?

I it just my messages or has the long wished for HTML to text functionality silently been implemented even on email source that is HTML _only_ (that is no plain text multipart)? When I display HTML messages of such HTMl-only messages as plain text, _all_ the vital info (though not the

HTML-only to text conversion working now?

I it just my messages or has the long wished for HTML to text functionality silently been implemented even on email source that is HTML _only_ (that is no plain text multipart)? When I display HTML messagesof such HTMl-only messages as plain text, _all_ the vital info (though not the formatting

Re: forwarding HTML messages

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 17:25 +0100, Carl Darby wrote: >Is there any way to redirect HTML using Powermail. Occassionally I get >an email which has quite a lot of html in it but when I either FORWARD >or REDIRECT it the html is stripped. I've found that redirecting (but not fo

Re: redirecting HTML Emails

seek out our telephone number and call us. Someone will be able to assist you, but it ain't gonna be me... I'm going fishin' regards... Steve >Is there any way to Redirect HTML emails which contain things such as >animation. Up until now whenever I have attempted this the an

redirecting HTML Emails

Is there any way to Redirect HTML emails which contain things such as animation. Up until now whenever I have attempted this the animation doesn't work and the pictures are simply sent as attachments. Forwarding the email simply strips the HTML. Ta. Carl

Re: HTML globe button behaviour

Rick Lecoat wrote: >Is there any way to change prefs to [view in Web browser] >via a quick click rather than having to click and hold? I vote for that behavior, too. I never choose "View HTML". I always choose to see it in my browser. Richard Hart

HTML globe button behaviour

Currently, the little globe button exhibits the following behaviour: Quick click: loads HTML version of email into mail browser. Click and hold: a) View message in web browser b) Show HTML I always opt to view the message in a web browser (Click and hold, opt. A). Is

Re: OS 10.4.9, PowerMail 5.5.3 - still can't print HTML email

Marlyse Comte said: >I am sorry to see that you think of this as an error and something that >needs to be fixed because in fact it is a feature request that you have No, it's not. It's a bug fix request, not a feature. Get over it. Mikael Tech facts: PM 5.5.3 Swedish | OS X 10.4.5 | Powerbook G

Re: OS 10.4.9, PowerMail 5.5.3 - still can't print HTML email

Winston Weinmann said: >If PowerMail sent all HTML email to a web browser for reading I could >live with that. But if it can display HTML email, and print it, it >should do so in the same way as every other Mac program. What it does >now is neither standard nor intuitive. This is

Re: OS 10.4.9, PowerMail 5.5.3 - still can't print HTML email

Am/On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:10:41 -0400 schrieb/wrote Winston Weinmann: >How much would that be? Dollars, Euros or Kuna? (or Swiss Francs?) a lot of course ... in Schweizer Franken on a numbered account and the Euros you can send to me :-D Thanks and all the best Matthias

Re(2): OS 10.4.9, PowerMail 5.5.3 - still can't print HTML email

nting via the web >>browser is what I normally do, but sometimes I either forget, or HTML >>mail looks enough like text mail that I don't realize I need to do this. >>I also get caught with not having clicked into the email text box, so >>get a lot of blank pages with a h

  1   2   3   4   5   >