Check This Out! Just got a new email at THEMAIL.COM
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], Firmanullah Firduas wanted us to inform you that THEMAIL.COM is now giving out a powerful free email service. Best of all, I get paid for reading email! - Check it out for yourself at: http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=1286295 TheMail.com PostMaster
RE: bgp problems
You are using eBGP multihop so it's important to find out if you have a route to your provider and also if your provider has a route to you. You have a default route which points to your provider, but I would add a host based static route to your bgp neighbor. With BGP, you can have problems when you use a default route to get to your BGP connection; then when BGP comes up you learn a more specific route via BGP and all the other networks become unreachable due to a bad next hop. You also need to ensure that your provider has a route back to your serial interface. Regards, Aaron K. Dixon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yee, Jason Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:32 AM To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: bgp problems hi Anyone can help me with the problems below : Hi, The configuration file is attached. For two days the link was down because the some problem in local line. Now it was set right. After that the bgp link came up and worked fine for 90 mins. After there is no data transfer in this link. By the same time I am able to ping 202.65.129.81 ( ip for my IRD), so I given a complaint to customercare, USA. And also I restarted IRD here. The link came up after 30 mins. Now again the link was up, but there is no active bgp connection. when I see bgp neighbors, it is showing No active TCP connections <<2501.log>> Any form of input will be greatly appreciated thanks Jason **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bgp problems
what do "sh ip bgp sum" and "sh ip bgp nei" produce ? --- Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE Networking solutions consultant CCNP, CCDA S&T Romania tel: +401 20 40 300 fax: +401 20 40 310 --- > -Original Message- > From: Yee, Jason [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:32 AM > To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) > Subject: bgp problems > > hi Anyone can help me with the problems below : > Hi, > > The configuration file is attached. > > For two days the link was down because the some problem in local line. Now > it was set right. After that the bgp link came up and worked fine for 90 > mins. After there is no data transfer in this link. By the same time I am > able to ping 202.65.129.81 ( ip for my IRD), so I given a complaint to > customercare, USA. And also I restarted IRD here. The link came > up after 30 mins. Now again the link was up, but there is no active bgp > connection. > > when I see bgp neighbors, it is showing > > No active TCP connections > > <<2501.log>> > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > > thanks > > Jason > > > > > > << File: 2501.log >> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dlsw + ISDN backup
just make sure that the DLSw referneces the loopback addresses and that you are using something like eigrp. Put a default router to the other side BRI with a higher admin distance - such as 200 for example. It will work.. I have it working here Regards Andrew -Original Message-From: emirates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 07 September 2000 13:43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: dlsw + ISDN backup Hi Guys, Small issue regarding DLSW, I want to enable it on two router using Cisco 3640 on serial and use ISDN as a backup. Is there any special configuration required to use isdn backup for dlsw? I would really appreciate if anyone send me sample configuration if its doable? Best Regards AA
Re: Win2k SNMP Traffic
On Jan 27, 2:53pm, Deepak Sharma wrote: } } [gibberish snipped] } } So is there any way i can block SNMP traffic on win2k professional from } the routers..cause i still wanna see the pdc and bdc's.but this } is not too important...I just REALLY need to stop those win2k machines } from appearing on network neighborhood } } Deepak Sharma } MSCE CCNA ACT A+ } Ceridian Canada Ltd. Thanks for devaluing these certifications. Remind me never to hire you for anything, since it is extremely obvious that you are only paper certified. HINT: SNMP has absolutely nothing to do with network neighbourhood. If you had actually earned those certifications you would know that. }-- End of excerpt from Deepak Sharma **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Check This Out! Just got a new email at THEMAIL.COM
In a message dated 9/8/00 2:47:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], Firmanullah Firduas wanted us to inform you that THEMAIL.COM is now giving out a powerful free email service. Best of all, I get paid for reading email! - Check it out for yourself at: http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=1286295 TheMail.com PostMaster >> Don't ever send something like this to the list again or you will be kicked off...This is called spamming! Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year killing everyone inside. ~Robert Cringely, InfoWorld~ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCSN
Agreed What is the chance of finalising this thread??... E is the answer - I can almost stack something important on it. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 September 2000 02:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jh Subject: Re: BCSN What page is that on. Duck - Original Message - From: jh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:18 PM Subject: Re: BCSN > Answer e is also right out of the book(BCMSN). It is point that they harp > on. Several of the questions can pertain to Vlans, security etc, but the > feeling I get from reading the Cisco books is that vlans increase > performance and efficiency because they decrease the broadcasts in domains. > And they do it (theoretically) better than routers, and with less > angement( again theoretically) > > > - Original Message - > From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "j h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:11 PM > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > Yeah but vlans dont provide the service anymore than a subnet does. > Routing > > or layer 3 swithcing provides E. VLANs are a broadcast domain. > > answer C is right out of the Cisco press book yet they marked it wrong > > - Original Message - > > From: j h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 8:06 AM > > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > > > > > > > I think the answer would e. Cisco sells Vlans as being the great > > broadcast > > > domain separator while maintaining an effecient network. > > > > > > >From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Subject: BCSN > > > >Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:53:20 -0700 > > > > > > > >What would be the right answer to this question. > > > >I got this off the cisco site and I answered c but they marked it rong. > I > > > >think this is a mistake. > > > >Thanks > > > >Duck > > > >VLANs have been designed to _. > > > > > > > > A. address forwarding decisions based on transport layer information > > and > > > >spanning tree > > > >scalability > > > > B. maximize the amount of traffic switched at Layer 3 and minimize > the > > > >amount of traffic switched at Layer 2 > > > > C. address the scalability issues of a flat network topology and the > > > >addition of network > > > >management through Layer 3 routing protocols > > > > D. address redundant access to the workgroup and migration of > servers > > to > > > >server farms for increased security and management of data resources > > > > E. address segmenting broadcast domains while still providing > > > >network-wide > > > >shared services and allowing users to use hyperlinks to hop > transparently > > > >between servers across enterprise networks > > > > > > > >___ > > > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
Hi, I am too in the same boat and am studying for BSCN. The book you are mentioning is Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle. And for BGP coverage go for Internet Routing Architectures - By Basam Halabi. Both of them would be enough for BSCN. Ram. -Original Message Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:39:27 +0200 From: Jean-Michel Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Study Materials for CCNP 2.0 Track? Hi all, There was another book recommended for the BSCN exam (additional material) , I think it was by someone called Halabi (or something like that, pls correct me if I'm wrong). It's about protocols/routing IP. Do any of you know what the book is called? Thanks in advance. Jean-Michel _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dlsw + ISDN backup
If your dlsw peers point to an physical interface that goes away --> dlsw peers will go away . This is the main reason to work with loopbacks . DLSw only requires that the peers are reachable . For the backup , all routing stuff should be inplace before 3 DLSw keep-alives . ( 90 seconds ) How you handle that has nothing to do with DLSw . Floating statics are certainly an option . flem --- Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just make sure that the DLSw referneces the loopback > addresses and that you > are using something like eigrp. Put a default router > to the other side BRI > with a higher admin distance - such as 200 for > example. It will work.. I > have it working here > > Regards > > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: emirates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 September 2000 13:43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: dlsw + ISDN backup > > > Hi Guys, > > Small issue regarding DLSW, I want to enable it on > two router using Cisco > 3640 on serial and use ISDN as a backup. Is there > any special configuration > required to use isdn backup for dlsw? > I would really appreciate if anyone send me sample > configuration if its > doable? > > Best Regards > AA > > > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP metric
EIGRP metric looks at bandwidth, delay, mtu, load, reliability. For an adjaceny to form they metrics must be the same on both sides, or the 2 routers will never route or pass updates. Best to make the same changes on both sides. As for the clock rate, I am not to sure here - a flying guess says yes Regards Andrew -Original Message- From: SV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 September 2000 17:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EIGRP metric Hi friends I am reading up on EIGRP and have some questions My scenario is simple; two routers connected by a DCE/DTE crossover cables. 1) Does the clock rate set on the DCE interface effect the EIGRP metric in any way. 2) If suppose I change the bandwidth and the delay of the interface on Router 1 from the default values, should I have to change it on the router R2 too. Thanks SV ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: netbios, whats it good for?
I have not read Laura's book but it is not good to have TO MUCH of anything flying around :) Netbios is packed in TCP/IP . What is wrong with it ? Why are you using it ? Answer this and you know if it is good to have this traffic flying around . --- vic_kanjana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have a lot of "remote" Netbios which taking > a ride on DLSW+, you might > be able to filter them out, if you don't need them. > > Scott Nelson wrote: > > > Hah! But you can't remove Netbios. It's a Windoze > feature. > > > > Scott > > > > > You know that handy-dandy feature in Windows > called Network Neighborhood? > > > Remove NetBIOS and you won't see any other > workstations on the network. > > > > > > T. Miller > > > "beth shriver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> I was recently reading through one of laura > chappels > > >> pod books that suggested netbios was not a good > thing > > >> to have too much on the network. I just > recently took > > >> a look at my network and i see a TON of it > flying > > >> around! capturenet shows:tcp->NETBIOS-SSN > > >> can you tell me what this netbios would be good > for > > >> and if nothing how do i get rid of it? > > >> thanks > > >> Beth > > >> > > >> > __ > > >> Do You Yahoo!? > > >> Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from > anywhere! > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > >> > > >> ___ > > >> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > > Scott Nelson - Network Engineer > > Wash DC +1202-270-8968 & +1202-352-6646 > > Los Angeles +1310-367-6646 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > > "The better the customer service, the sooner you > get to speak > > with someone who can't help you." > > -- > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dlsw + ISDN backup
you can configure your router like this; username C3640-B password cisco dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2 promiscuous dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 1.1.1.1 dynamic no-llc 10 dlsw netbios-keepalive-filter interface s0 backup interface bri0 backup delay 10 30 interface bri0/0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 60 dialer map llc2 name C3640-B broadcast 111 dialer-group 1 dialer-list 1 protocol llc2 permit -Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ - Original Message - From: Andrew Larkins To: emirates ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 2:59 PM Subject: RE: dlsw + ISDN backup just make sure that the DLSw referneces the loopback addresses and that you are using somncaething like eigrp. Put a default router to the other side BRI with a higher admin distance - such as 200 for example. It will work.. I have it working here Regards Andrew -Original Message-From: emirates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 07 September 2000 13:43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: dlsw + ISDN backup Hi Guys, Small issue regarding DLSW, I want to enable it on two router using Cisco 3640 on serial and use ISDN as a backup. Is there any special configuration required to use isdn backup for dlsw? I would really appreciate if anyone send me sample configuration if its doable? Best Regards AA
No Subject
pls remove my mail address from the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: load balancing on Rip
I must disagree on nandit . The first packet is always process switched and will populate the arp cache . So , you will see entries in the sh arp . The remaining packets are fast-switched and you can see the fast-cache using sh ip cache . This fast-cache is build partly from the normal arp cache . The both caches have there own aging algorithme. flem --- nandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > As Erick says No-ip route cache will give no output > when you do a show arp > and cache contents cannot be viewed. > The default setting is 4 hours if I am right > bye > nandit > "Erick B." wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > >Hi, > > > >On the interface config, you may have 'ip > >route-cache'. This is known as fast-switching where > >the router will cache destination address's and > always > >send them over the same link. > > > >If you have 'no ip route-cache' then this is > >per-packet switching and the router will do it > >per-packet. > > > >-E > > > >--- Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >> What type of route caching are you talking about > >> Duck > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Protocol Analyzer and Sniffers
Hello group, does anyone know of any Analyzers, probes or sniffers that that would support (DWDM) Division Wave Division Multiplexing, ATM, Sonnet, Gigabit and Fasteternet. Thanks Fred Thomas **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP metric
clock-rate makes no difference to the metric . I cannot see why the bandwidth parameter cannot be different on both neighbouring routers . For one router in question only the outbound interfaces to the destination are considered in the calculation of the metric . flem --- Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > EIGRP metric looks at bandwidth, delay, mtu, load, > reliability. > For an adjaceny to form they metrics must be the > same on both sides, or the > 2 routers will never route or pass updates. > Best to make the same changes on both sides. As for > the clock rate, I am not > to sure here - a flying guess says yes > > Regards > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: SV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 September 2000 17:25 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: EIGRP metric > > > Hi friends > > I am reading up on EIGRP and have some questions > My scenario is simple; two routers connected by a > DCE/DTE crossover cables. > 1) Does the clock rate set on the DCE interface > effect the EIGRP metric in > any way. > > 2) If suppose I change the bandwidth and the delay > of the interface on > Router 1 from the default values, should I have to > change it on the router > R2 too. > > Thanks > > SV > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bgp problems
I have checked but the neighbor 202.161.130.249 is actually a host of a loopback interface having mask of 255.255.255.255 and I can't add in this mask in a static route , what should I do ? please mail me a [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron K. Dixon Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 2:20 PM To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: RE: bgp problems You are using eBGP multihop so it's important to find out if you have a route to your provider and also if your provider has a route to you. You have a default route which points to your provider, but I would add a host based static route to your bgp neighbor. With BGP, you can have problems when you use a default route to get to your BGP connection; then when BGP comes up you learn a more specific route via BGP and all the other networks become unreachable due to a bad next hop. You also need to ensure that your provider has a route back to your serial interface. Regards, Aaron K. Dixon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yee, Jason Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:32 AM To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: bgp problems hi Anyone can help me with the problems below : Hi, The configuration file is attached. For two days the link was down because the some problem in local line. Now it was set right. After that the bgp link came up and worked fine for 90 mins. After there is no data transfer in this link. By the same time I am able to ping 202.65.129.81 ( ip for my IRD), so I given a complaint to customercare, USA. And also I restarted IRD here. The link came up after 30 mins. Now again the link was up, but there is no active bgp connection. when I see bgp neighbors, it is showing No active TCP connections <<2501.log>> Any form of input will be greatly appreciated thanks Jason **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVOICE 2.0 Beta passed
Hi .. I passed it, I thought I'll get failed, because so many questions on Voice over frame-relay .. Ibam Cvoice,Cvoice 2.0 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
Ole, ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size (hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet frame to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN identification information. I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also ISL allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely to make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further illuminate this issue. Regards, Tom -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 802.1Q or ISL Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the end of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That has brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some feedback on this subject. I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this scenario. The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking link : ISL or 802.1Q??? The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 bytes to each frame. The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply encapsulates it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. Any comments on this? Thanks, Ole ~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help Password recovery 4000
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/ You should be able to find what you need there. Bob CCNP/CCDP (I'll only do that this once... just passed my CID - Yay!) - Original Message - From: Alex Soon to be CCIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:50 PM Subject: Help Password recovery 4000 > I can't figure it out. I have a 4000 running ios v 9.14(5). I don't have > the exec password. I cannot get to ROMMON. The break key does not work nor > could I find a jumper marked for hardware configuration register. I read > somewhere that change it from 0 or 1 to 15? > > Thanks in advance > Alex > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Study Materials for CCNP 2.0 Track?
Enough already with the whole Layer 1/Hub debacle. The McGraw Hill stuff isn't that bad. It's a case of either-or when choosing between Cisco Press and Mcgraw Hill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Try layer 1. Hubs and repeateras are purely physical. They don't process > data in any way, shape, or form. All they do is move bits from one port to > another. They are focused on BITS, not packets, segments, or frames. Check > your OSI layer functions. > > Bridges and switches are layer 2 > Routers and MLS cards are layer 3 & 4 (depending on whether you're > switching/routing by net address or protocol/port) > > Karen E Young > ELF Technologies, Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Desk: 206-770-4035 > Pager: 206-994-4514 > > > > > "Andrew > Larkins" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > bal.co.za> Subject: Re: Study Materials for CCNP 2.0 Track? > Sent by: > nobody@groups > tudy.com > > > 09/07/2000 > 08:18 AM > Please > respond to > "Andrew > Larkins" > > > > > > What si wrong with "layer 2 devices" - that is what they are?? > > > ""Bradley J. Wilson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 00d001c01854$635f8de0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:00d001c01854$635f8de0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi guys - > > > > I'm studying for the CCNP myself, and I bought all four McGraw Hill > > Technical Expert books (all supervised by Tom Thomas, author of the Cisco > > OSPF book) - and they stink. I'd wait for the Cisco or even the Syngress > > books if I were you. Case in point: in the BCMSN book, repeaters and > hubs > > are referred to throughout as "Layer 2 devices." 'Nuff said. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Bradley J. Wilson > > CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CCSE, CNX-A, NNCSS, MCT, CTT > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Seth Wilson > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:25 PM > > Subject: Re: Study Materials for CCNP 2.0 Track? > > > > > > Hi Tracy, > > > > I'm just starting to study for my CCNP as well. I believe--someone > correct > > me if I'm wrong on this--that all the books for the CCNP 2.0 are > available > > save for the BSCN (Building Scalable Cisco Networks) which corresponds to > > the Routing 2.0 exam. I'm presently studying for the Switching 2.0 exam, > > and the BCMSN (Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks) Cisco Press > book > > is available for that for certain. I believe the BCRAN and CIT books are > > also available though. Best of luck. > > > > ~Seth~ > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static route question !!
HI all. In configuring static route between a central site router and a branch office router, do we need to configure static route on both routers? or either of them? or only central site router? or only branch office router? and why? Thanks in adv. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quicken.com - News
/ What? I guess I missed the relationship between Cisco and Quicken. \ Quoting Lou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > = > http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/bw/?story=3D/news/stories/b= > w/2905/a2047.htm > - This mail sent through Atlantic.Net Webmail: http://webmail.atlantic.net/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static route ANSWER !!
You need a route to the destination and a route back to the source. Does that answer your question? So, yes, you will probably need (2) static routes (unless you are also running a dynamic routing protocol). -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 used cisco gear: www.optsys.net "jeongwoo park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > HI all. > In configuring static route between a central site > router and a branch office router, do we need to > configure static route on both routers? or either of > them? or only central site router? or only branch > office router? and why? > > Thanks in adv. > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
Thanks for your reply Tom, However, according to the book I'm reading, the 802.1Q DOES change the frame size by adding 4 bytes into it. Take care, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp -Original Message- From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL Ole, ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size (hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet frame to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN identification information. I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also ISL allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely to make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further illuminate this issue. Regards, Tom -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 802.1Q or ISL Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the end of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That has brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some feedback on this subject. I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this scenario. The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking link : ISL or 802.1Q??? The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 bytes to each frame. The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply encapsulates it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. Any comments on this? Thanks, Ole ~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
Yeah, notice the # that got decertified...wow...can you say, "NETWORKERS here I come???" lol -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 ""Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I think it's because we're finding MCSEs are being paid more and that > originally, CCIEs were just made to generate people wanting Cisco's > certsK-I-D-D-I-N-G > > It is interesting to see the decline. > > -Original Message- > From: andy lennon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go down... > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > Andy Lennon > > ccnp/dp/mcse > > > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP problem
Dear Group, I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP on a couple of 3640s. I have set this up using configurations that have been working previously. Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 autosensing switches (separate but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or segmentation set up on the switches. I have set up debugging on the standby on both routers. What I see is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see the incoming hello packets, consequently both routers think the other is down and therefore takes up the active router role. I have tried to do a multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 which I believe is the multicast group address that HSRP uses without success. I have attached the relevent bits of config below. If anyone could shed any light on this curious problem I would be most grateful. Standby router standby-router>#sh standby Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 Local state is Active, priority 100, may preempt, use bia Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured Active router is local Standby router is unknown expired Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 no ip redirects ip directed-broadcast standby use-bia standby priority 100 standby preempt standby ip 10.10.2.200 Primary-router>#sh standby Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt, use bia Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured Active router is local Standby router is unknown expired Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 interface Ethernet0/0 description *** Local Area Network Segment *** ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 no ip redirects ip directed-broadcast standby use-bia standby priority 200 preempt standby ip 45.10.2.200 Paul Montgomery Technical Project Manager CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCDA **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip helper address
You have 2 DHCP servers on the same subnet??? This is probably not a good idea... it does not really provide redundancy or load balancing. The DHCP client will issue a request and accept the first response that it gets. If you split your scope such that half of your available addresses are on one server and half are on the other, you will *NOT* see that half of your clients use one server while half use the other. If for some reason one server always replies a nanosecond earlier than the other, then all clients will accept the response from that server. Once that server is out of addresses, it will start sending nack's. The clients will start accepting those nack's and will not request an address again, even though the other DHCP server may have dozens of free addresses to offer. SO - in answer to your question, the ip helper address of 10.10.10.0 will allow your client's requests to reach all DHCP servers on that subnet, HOWEVER they will only accept leases from the first server from which they receive a response. Chances are that server will be the same one all the time, even after it runs out of addresses to offer... You *could* set up your DHCP servers such that the scope on EACH ONE is sufficient to offer leases to ALL of you clients, but that is probably a less than efficient use of your address space. I hope that this helps... Dale [=`) >From: "Dennis Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Dennis Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Ip helper address >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:10:44 -0500 > >I am trying to put a statement on the remote router to allow the clients to >obtain an IP address accross the WAN. I have used the ip helper-address >command successfully. My problem is that i would like any of the DHCP >servers at the central site to be able to service DHCP requests from the >remote site. Do I have to use mutilple ip helper-address statements ? I >have tried a helper address pointing to the subnet, but that does not seem >to work. EX. i have DHCP servers at 10.10.10.10 and 10.10.10.11 do i have >to >use two seperate ip helper address statements or can i use ip >helper-address >10.10.10.0 ? > > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FTP Throughput slowing down
Can anyone explain why, when I do an FTP from one location over a Frame Relay link to another, it starts out with a good throughput, but after a few minutes, drops significantly, and the total bandwidth is not being exceeded. There are a few routers in-between that I have no control over. Thanks **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCSN
Yeah but you said that E is right out of the BCMSN book what page is it on. I don't think that VLANs PROVIDE the kind of hopping they're talking about. That would be something that layer 3 does there is nothing in a VLAN design to reach another VLAN without a layer 3 protocol. got to be C. See if this makes sense: VLANs have been designed to _provide network-wide shared services and allow users to use hyperlinks to hop transparently between servers across enterprise networks and address the segmenting broadcast domains. I really have a hard time with the word PROVIDE in the ? they may both be right in cisco's mind but the word should be ALLOW not PROVIDE in my mind. See if this makes sense: VLANs have been designed to _ALLOW network-wide shared services and allow users to use hyperlinks to hop transparently between servers across enterprise networks and address the segmenting broadcast domains. I would take this in a heart beat. I think this has been a good thread, there has been about 6-8 different individuals participate and nobody asked for free software or what is the cut score for CCNA or where is free lab time. Still want the word for word page for E on this like was stated. I can tell you which page C is on word for word, if you want. Duck - Original Message - From: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; jh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:07 AM Subject: RE: BCSN > Agreed > > What is the chance of finalising this thread??... E is the answer - I can > almost stack something important on it. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 08 September 2000 02:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jh > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > What page is that on. > Duck > - Original Message - > From: jh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:18 PM > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > Answer e is also right out of the book(BCMSN). It is point that they harp > > on. Several of the questions can pertain to Vlans, security etc, but the > > feeling I get from reading the Cisco books is that vlans increase > > performance and efficiency because they decrease the broadcasts in > domains. > > And they do it (theoretically) better than routers, and with less > > angement( again theoretically) > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "j h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:11 PM > > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > > > > Yeah but vlans dont provide the service anymore than a subnet does. > > Routing > > > or layer 3 swithcing provides E. VLANs are a broadcast domain. > > > answer C is right out of the Cisco press book yet they marked it wrong > > > - Original Message - > > > From: j h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 8:06 AM > > > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the answer would e. Cisco sells Vlans as being the great > > > broadcast > > > > domain separator while maintaining an effecient network. > > > > > > > > >From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Subject: BCSN > > > > >Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:53:20 -0700 > > > > > > > > > >What would be the right answer to this question. > > > > >I got this off the cisco site and I answered c but they marked it > rong. > > I > > > > >think this is a mistake. > > > > >Thanks > > > > >Duck > > > > >VLANs have been designed to _. > > > > > > > > > > A. address forwarding decisions based on transport layer > information > > > and > > > > >spanning tree > > > > >scalability > > > > > B. maximize the amount of traffic switched at Layer 3 and minimize > > the > > > > >amount of traffic switched at Layer 2 > > > > > C. address the scalability issues of a flat network topology and > the > > > > >addition of network > > > > >management through Layer 3 routing protocols > > > > > D. address redundant access to the workgroup and migration of > > servers > > > to > > > > >server farms for increased security and management of data resources > > > > > E. address segmenting broadcast domains while still providing > > > > >network-wide > > > > >shared services and allowing users to use hyperlinks to hop > > transparently > > > > >between servers across enterprise networks > > > > > > > > > >___ > > > > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
study partner
Is anyone in the the Austin area interested in studying together for CCNP? I would like to have someone else to work with. I have a small lab with 3 routers and a switch. Please respond to me not to the list. Rick **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide
I have heard that Cisco significantly discounts the proice of support contracts to companies with current CCIEs. If this is true it is one reason why keeping the cert current increases marketability. Nathan Miller -Original Message- From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:21 PM To: Chris Hagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide / Another question is...Has an employer ever asked "is your CCIE current"? \ -Original Message- From: Chris Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:12 PM Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >Well, if it costs $1,000 to take the lab again, which involves hours and >hours of studying, and you go to a client and say, I'm CCIE and I let >my certifications lapse, but here's what I've been doing for the past X >number of years > > Do you really need those 4 letters anymore with most companies with that >level of experience? I mean, if it is out of date, it hasn't really been >long enough to be REALLY out of date... > >*plink plink* > >-Chris > > >"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Bollocks. >> By definition a CCIE is the best when it comes to real world experience. >> >> >> "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > Might it also mean that people are finding that the >> > certification is not as important in this market and >> > that the 'lower' level certifications, along with >> > 'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to >> > corporations and providers? >> > >> > >> > --- "Healis, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > This could be due to people not passing >> > > re-certification exams, failing to >> > > schedule the re-cert exam in time, death, or even >> > > worse Breaking Cisco's >> > > NDA!! >> > > >> > > Jim Healis, CCDP, CCNP >> > > Senior Network Administrator >> > > Virata >> > > >> > > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: Daniel Ji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:47 PM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >> > > >> > > I guess that's good news for all of us who are >> > > trying damn hard to be a >> > > CCIE. After all, the less # worldwide, the more >> > > value this cert will have. >> > > it's all just simple "supply vs demand". >> > > >> > > Good luck to all! >> > > >> > > Daniel >> > > Lab in Dec >> > > >> > > ""andy lennon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> > > 8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go >> > > down... >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html >> > > > >> > > > Andy Lennon >> > > > >> > > > ccnp/dp/mcse >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ___ >> > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more >> > > information go to >> > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > > _ >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more >> > > information go to >> > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > > _ >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > = >> > Robert Padjen >> > >> > __ >> > Do You Yahoo!? >> > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! >> > http://mail.yahoo.com/ >> > >> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > _ >> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> >> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> http://www.groupstudy.c
Re: HSRP problem
Hello Paul, First you should alway set your switch in static mode as 10 or 100 baseT if your sure the port attach is 10 or 100 BaseT, remove the autosense mode for those port Yves Routhier Paul Montgomery wrote: > > Dear Group, > > I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP on a couple of 3640s. I > have set this up using configurations that have been working previously. > Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 autosensing switches (separate > but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or segmentation set up on the > switches. I have set up debugging on the standby on both routers. What I see > is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see the incoming hello packets, > consequently both routers think the other is down and therefore takes up > the active router role. I have tried to do a multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 > which I believe is the multicast group address that HSRP uses without > success. > > I have attached the relevent bits of config below. > > If anyone could shed any light on this curious problem I would be most > grateful. > > Standby router > > standby-router>#sh standby > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 100, may preempt, use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 > > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 100 > standby preempt > standby ip 10.10.2.200 > > Primary-router>#sh standby > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt, use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 > > interface Ethernet0/0 > description *** Local Area Network Segment *** > ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 200 preempt > standby ip 45.10.2.200 > > Paul Montgomery > Technical Project Manager > CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCDA > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP problem
Dale, Yes I believe they do support multicast. In fact these are the same switches on which the HSRP was working previously! BTW there is a typo in the config below. On the Primary router's Int e0/0 the statement standby ip 45.10.2.200 should be standby ip 10.10.2.200 - oops. Regards, Paul. -Original Message- From: Dale Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 02:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP problem Do your switches support multicast? >From: Paul Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Paul Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: HSRP problem >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:08:11 +0100 > >Dear Group, > >I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP on a couple of 3640s. I >have set this up using configurations that have been working previously. >Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 autosensing switches (separate >but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or segmentation set up on the >switches. I have set up debugging on the standby on both routers. What I >see >is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see the incoming hello >packets, >consequently both routers think the other is down and therefore takes up >the active router role. I have tried to do a multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 >which I believe is the multicast group address that HSRP uses without >success. > >I have attached the relevent bits of config below. > >If anyone could shed any light on this curious problem I would be most >grateful. > > > >Standby router > >standby-router>#sh standby >Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 100, may preempt, use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 > >interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 100 > standby preempt > standby ip 10.10.2.200 > >Primary-router>#sh standby >Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt, use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 > >interface Ethernet0/0 > description *** Local Area Network Segment *** > ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 200 preempt > standby ip 45.10.2.200 > > > >Paul Montgomery >Technical Project Manager >CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCDA > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
>Thanks for your reply Tom, > >However, according to the book I'm reading, the 802.1Q DOES change the frame >size by adding 4 bytes into it. > >Take care, > >Ole From the horse's mouth, 802.1Q: 9.1 Overview Tagging a frame requires: a) The addition of a Tag Header to the frame. This header is inserted immediately following the Desti-nation MAC address and Source MAC address (and Routing, if present) fields of the frame to be transmitted; To return to your original question, Ole, when you speak of optimizing resource use, what do you consider the scarce resource? Other than in the martini-soaked brain (if I may use the term) of an overly zealous salesdroid, you can't optimize for everything at once. Save me from "specialists in all cars, foreign and domestic." Some optimizations could include: Bandwidth overhead Frame length Overhead frames (BPDU, for example) Latency in the switch Input serialization Processing Internal forwarding Output serialization Ease of use Interoperability Which do you want to optimize? > > >-Original Message- >From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM >To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > >Ole, > >ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 >byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size >(hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet frame >to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN >identification information. > >I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one >spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also ISL >allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely to >make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q >where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I >believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further >illuminate this issue. > >Regards, > >Tom > >-Original Message- >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM > >Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the end >of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That has >brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some feedback >on this subject. > >I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say >that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets >also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this >scenario. > >The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking >link : ISL or 802.1Q??? > >The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 >bytes to each frame. > >The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply encapsulates >it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. > >Any comments on this? > >Thanks, > >Ole **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
If your advertising to customers that you have a CCIE on your staff you need those 4 little letters. But if you just want to fudge it -Original Message- From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:21 PM To: Chris Hagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide / Another question is...Has an employer ever asked "is your CCIE current"? \ -Original Message- From: Chris Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:12 PM Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >Well, if it costs $1,000 to take the lab again, which involves hours and >hours of studying, and you go to a client and say, I'm CCIE and I let >my certifications lapse, but here's what I've been doing for the past X >number of years > > Do you really need those 4 letters anymore with most companies with that >level of experience? I mean, if it is out of date, it hasn't really been >long enough to be REALLY out of date... > >*plink plink* > >-Chris > > >"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Bollocks. >> By definition a CCIE is the best when it comes to real world experience. >> >> >> "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > Might it also mean that people are finding that the >> > certification is not as important in this market and >> > that the 'lower' level certifications, along with >> > 'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to >> > corporations and providers? >> > >> > >> > --- "Healis, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > This could be due to people not passing >> > > re-certification exams, failing to >> > > schedule the re-cert exam in time, death, or even >> > > worse Breaking Cisco's >> > > NDA!! >> > > >> > > Jim Healis, CCDP, CCNP >> > > Senior Network Administrator >> > > Virata >> > > >> > > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: Daniel Ji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:47 PM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >> > > >> > > I guess that's good news for all of us who are >> > > trying damn hard to be a >> > > CCIE. After all, the less # worldwide, the more >> > > value this cert will have. >> > > it's all just simple "supply vs demand". >> > > >> > > Good luck to all! >> > > >> > > Daniel >> > > Lab in Dec >> > > >> > > ""andy lennon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> > > 8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go >> > > down... >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html >> > > > >> > > > Andy Lennon >> > > > >> > > > ccnp/dp/mcse >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ___ >> > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more >> > > information go to >> > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > > _ >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more >> > > information go to >> > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > > _ >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > = >> > Robert Padjen >> > >> > __ >> > Do You Yahoo!? >> > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! >> > http://mail.yahoo.com/ >> > >> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> > _ >> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> >> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >> _ >>
RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
lol!!! You can't be serious. - >From: Robert Padjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Might it also mean that people are finding that the >certification is not as important in this market and >that the 'lower' level certifications, along with >'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to >corporations and providers? > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Demand Routing (ODR) - Anyone using this routing protocol?
Wondering if anyone is using ODR instead of RIP, IGRP, OSPF, EIGRP? How does it scale? What's the overhead? Thanks, Timothy J. Hornbeck Technical Analyst III - Team Lead National City Bank - The quality of a network is not based on complexity, but on its simplicity and adherence to solid fundamentals. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quicken.com - News
/ Is this a SPAM? \ Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > / > What? I guess I missed the relationship between Cisco and Quicken. > \ > > > > > > Quoting Lou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > = > > > http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/bw/?story=3D/news/stories/b= > > w/2905/a2047.htm > > > > > - > This mail sent through Atlantic.Net Webmail: http://webmail.atlantic.net/ > ___ > To unsubscribe from the Jobs list, send a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: > unsubscribe jobs > - This mail sent through Atlantic.Net Webmail: http://webmail.atlantic.net/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Core Layer Design
I am looking for real life examples of layer 2 only switches connecting the core layer to the distribution layer. I've seen white papers recommending to use and not use layer 2 only switches between the two layers. If you have installed a layer 2 switch between the core and distribution layer, please let me know the results. If it caused problems, what were they. Did it solve problems? If you have URLs or other documentation that addresses this issues, we would appreciate your input. Thank you in advance for your assistance. David M. Crosby Renton Distributed Network Design 425-234-2124 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP problem
Bill, Thanks for your response. I actually had a group number in an earlier config. I took it out after looking at a sample config on the cisco web site (http://cisco.com/warp/public/619/1.html) Either way it didn't work. Regards, Paul. -Original Message- From: Bill O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 03:43 To: Paul Montgomery Subject: Re: HSRP problem Paul, I think you need a number after standby to associate a group so both router know there in the same group e0 standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 standby 1 preempt standby 1 priority 100 e0 standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 standby 1 preempt standby 1 priority 200 Bill --- Paul Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Group, > > I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP > on a couple of 3640s. I > have set this up using configurations that have been > working previously. > Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 > autosensing switches (separate > but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or > segmentation set up on the > switches. I have set up debugging on the standby on > both routers. What I see > is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see the > incoming hello packets, > consequently both routers think the other is down > and therefore takes up > the active router role. I have tried to do a > multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 > which I believe is the multicast group address that > HSRP uses without > success. > > I have attached the relevent bits of config below. > > If anyone could shed any light on this curious > problem I would be most > grateful. > > > > Standby router > > standby-router>#sh standby > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 100, may preempt, > use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 > > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 100 > standby preempt > standby ip 10.10.2.200 > > Primary-router>#sh standby > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt, > use bia > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > Active router is local > Standby router is unknown expired > Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 > > interface Ethernet0/0 > description *** Local Area Network Segment *** > ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 > no ip redirects > ip directed-broadcast > standby use-bia > standby priority 200 preempt > standby ip 45.10.2.200 > > > > Paul Montgomery > Technical Project Manager > CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCDA > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP Telephony book!
How can I get one if I don't have a customer code? On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:35:11 -0600 "Daniel Boutet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had quite a few replies sent to my personal address. Please if you > have > any questions reply to the group. > Someone else in the group might be interested. > > As far as the Free IP Telephony book: by doing a search in the > archives I > came up with: > > > http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/lm/buffer/offer/govgameplan/1371_gov_jump/V 458 > -100S1 > > I think that the last person to post this link was Ed Farmer. So > Thank you > Ed! > > > > ""Daniel Boutet"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 8p87he$bpv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p87he$bpv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Now I can say that some things are free. I just received my FREE > IP > > Telephony book.by Gorolski & Kolon. > > Anyone read it yet? Care to comment.? > > > > Thanks to the GROUP for the link and to Cisco for the book! > > > > > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go > to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 805 Router serial port
Here is where the info is: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/805/805hwin/index.htm Pick Selecting a Serial Cable its all laid out there. Just decide on your protocol and the sex of the connector. Your may find yourself butting two cables together or making your own so good luck. I really hate that some idiot decided that connector was a "good" idea. On 8 Sep 2000 01:34:24 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Greg Reaume") wrote: >Hi there, > >Were you able to find a cable config for what you were looking for? Do you >understand the interface and req'd cables enough to provide me with a >back-to-back fr cloud sim config or a back-to-back-to-back fr switched >config? > >The reason I ask is because I have 2/3 2621s with WIC-2A/S cards in them >that seem to have this "SmartSerial" interface you are referring to on your >805. These are lab routers and I need to find the cables and config to >achieve a fr sim lab. Prefferably with all 3 routers to sim a fr switch and >2 end points. > >Any information you could provide me with would be very much appreciated. > >TIA, > >Greg > > >"Hurin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> I have a new 805 that has me stumped. All other serial interfaces Ive >> seen use a DB-60 connector but this one has one Ive not seen before in >> fact its not DB-anything. Checked the online cisco docs and have seen >> no mention of this connector before. Show interfaces does have a >> serial port for S0 but cant for the life of me figgure out what cable >> is used here. >> >> ___ >> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win2k SNMP Traffic
First off, I admit that I have little knowledge of Win2k. I installed the trial edition that came with Technet, played around with it for a little, and haven't messed with it since. My organization is still with NT 4.0, and we aren't migrating for a while. But: You say you have PDCs and BDCs, so I'm assuming that you've added the Win2K machines to the domain. (Then again, you also said you wanted Win9x from Dell, so I'm not sure) In my quick tests with Win2k, I remember that Win2k machines responded to Server Manager (Showed up as NT 5.0). If the RPC is still left as default, and you haven't forced Kerebros authentication, the solution is simple. >From Server Manager on an NT 4.0 server, highlight the Win2K machine. Go to File --> Services. (Double clicking on the Win2k machine won't do it) Stop the SNMP Service, and change the start-up to disabled. All done. If the Win2k machines aren't on an NT domain, but you have the administrative passwords, it can still be done, but it's trickier. The Win2k resource kit might have a few tools that would be useful, too. Hope it helps, Joel Studtmann MCSE, MCP+I A+, Network+ CCNA, CCDA - Original Message - From: "Deepak Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 5:17 AM Subject: Win2k SNMP Traffic > Ok here's the scenario. > > Multiple branch offices,( LAN, WAN> slowest 56k and fastest oc3) and > cisco routers from 1900's to 3600's ) > > PDC, and a whole lota BDC's. NT 4.0 PDC and BDCs; still wanna see the > those computers when I go into network neighbor hood. > BT.Dell is now shipping all there new Pc's with win2k > professional, and refuse to go back to win9x for me. (( > ba*tards))this causes me to have alota headache, cause win2k has > SNMP traffic enabled by Default when we get them...and now I can start > to see all the new win2k machines in network neighbor hood. This is a > problem due to security reasons and management and blah blah blah...and > there's NO possible way I can go, or tell the techy there to go to > disable SNMP traffic on all the new comps!!!I was thinking about > goin to all the branch offices and config. the routers to block snmp > traffic ( port 161 off the top of my head ), > > So is there any way i can block SNMP traffic on win2k professional from > the routers..cause i still wanna see the pdc and bdc's.but this > is not too important...I just REALLY need to stop those win2k machines > from appearing on network neighborhood > > " access-list 100 deny snmp win2kpro" hahah > > > thanks > > Deepak Sharma > MSCE CCNA ACT A+ > Ceridian Canada Ltd. > -- > \\|// > (o o) > oOOo-(_)-oOOo > *@ bcz finest @* > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCSN
You have to remember that VLANS are logical entitiies, not physical. The amount of redundancy that they provide will be inversely related to the reliability of the physical networks that they are situated in, regardless of the fact that VLANS in design and concept are used to circumvent said physical networks. So if your configuration is solid and your physical networks are concrete you should be fine. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Donald B Johnson Jr > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 2:56 PM > To: Jason Baker; 'luobin Yang'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cslx > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > Yeah but vlan's don't provide redundant access do they? > Duck > - Original Message - > From: Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'luobin Yang' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; cslx > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 12:56 AM > Subject: RE: BCSN > > > > VLAN's are for enhanced security. Nomention of it in E. > > D would be correct > > > > Regards, > > > > Jason Baker > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: luobin Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:25 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cslx > > Subject: Re: BCSN > > > > > > I don't see why D is preferable than E > > > > cslx wrote: > > > > > if it is a single choice,it is D,otherwise it is D,E > > > "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > 02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > What would be the right answer to this question. > > > > I got this off the cisco site and I answered c but they marked it > rong. > > I > > > > think this is a mistake. > > > > Thanks > > > > Duck > > > > VLANs have been designed to _. > > > > > > > > A. address forwarding decisions based on transport layer > information > > and > > > > spanning tree > > > > scalability > > > > B. maximize the amount of traffic switched at Layer 3 and minimize > the > > > > amount of traffic switched at Layer 2 > > > > C. address the scalability issues of a flat network > topology and the > > > > addition of network > > > > management through Layer 3 routing protocols > > > > D. address redundant access to the workgroup and migration of > servers > > to > > > > server farms for increased security and management of data resources > > > > E. address segmenting broadcast domains while still providing > > > network-wide > > > > shared services and allowing users to use hyperlinks to hop > > transparently > > > > between servers across enterprise networks > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
I hate martini Howard. Anyway, I believe I mean the latency in the switch. It's kind of, what would be the fastest thing to do: A) Put a large overcoat on and button 30 buttons. or B) Take your coat off, put a vest on with 4 buttons, and put the coat back on - (no buttons on the coat). Now consider a line of 1000 guests waiting for you to do A or B on them. What method would be the fastest to get these people out the door so you could go to bed? Have a great weekend, Ole ~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL >Thanks for your reply Tom, > >However, according to the book I'm reading, the 802.1Q DOES change the frame >size by adding 4 bytes into it. > >Take care, > >Ole From the horse's mouth, 802.1Q: 9.1 Overview Tagging a frame requires: a) The addition of a Tag Header to the frame. This header is inserted immediately following the Desti-nation MAC address and Source MAC address (and Routing, if present) fields of the frame to be transmitted; To return to your original question, Ole, when you speak of optimizing resource use, what do you consider the scarce resource? Other than in the martini-soaked brain (if I may use the term) of an overly zealous salesdroid, you can't optimize for everything at once. Save me from "specialists in all cars, foreign and domestic." Some optimizations could include: Bandwidth overhead Frame length Overhead frames (BPDU, for example) Latency in the switch Input serialization Processing Internal forwarding Output serialization Ease of use Interoperability Which do you want to optimize? > > >-Original Message- >From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM >To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > >Ole, > >ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 >byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size >(hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet frame >to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN >identification information. > >I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one >spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also ISL >allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely to >make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q >where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I >believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further >illuminate this issue. > >Regards, > >Tom > >-Original Message- >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM > >Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the end >of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That has >brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some feedback >on this subject. > >I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say >that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets >also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this >scenario. > >The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking >link : ISL or 802.1Q??? > >The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 >bytes to each frame. > >The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply encapsulates >it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. > >Any comments on this? > >Thanks, > >Ole **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM deaming/line encoding problem
Hello colleagues, I have a problem with my ATM connection from my Cisco router to a Cisco BPX ATM switch. When I look at the line on the switch, the line status is ok. When I run the 'sh cont atm 1/0' command, I get the following output (maybe anybody as an idea on where the error could be); I know this is going to be a very long mail, but I can't help it: zrh-atm#sh contr atm1/0 Interface ATM1/0 is down Hardware is ATM E1 LANE client MAC address is 0002.4b76.0dd0 hwidb=0x81472004, ds=0x8148C564 slot 1, unit 0, subunit 0 rs8234 base 0x4080, slave base 0x4080 rs8234 ds 0x8148C564 SBDs - avail 2048, guaranteed 1, unguaranteed 2047, starved 0 Seg VCC table 4080B800, Shadow Seg VCC Table 814A8380, VCD Table 814BE3AC Schedule table 40816800, Shadow Schedule table 814C43D8, Size 7CD RSM VCC Table 4082BD00, Shadow RSM VCC Table 814C9414 VPI Index Table 40829280, VCI Index Table 4082B900 Bucket2 Table 40820480, Shadow Bucket2 Table 814C6338 MCR Limit Table 40820880, Shadow MCR Table 814C7F64 ABR template 40820A80, Shadow template 811FF798 RM Cell RS Queue 40829900 Queue TXQ Addr Pos StQ Addr Pos 0 UBR CHN0 40825A80 0028B4EA0 0 1 UBR CHN1 40825E80 0028B56A0 0 2 UBR CHN2 40826280 0028B5EA0 0 3 UBR CHN3 40826680 0028B66A0 0 4 VBR/ABR CHN0 40826A80 0028B6EA0 0 5 VBR/ABR CHN1 40826E80 0028B76A0 0 6 VBR/ABR CHN2 40827280 0028B7EA0 0 7 VBR/ABR CHN3 40827680 0028B86A0 0 8 VBR-RT CHN0 40827A80 0028B8EA0 0 9 VBR-RT CHN1 40827E80 0028B96A0 0 10 VBR-RT CHN2 40828280 0028B9EA0 0 11 VBR-RT CHN3 40828680 0028BA6A0 0 12 SIG 40828A80 0028BAEA0 0 13 VPD 40828E80 0028BB6A0 0 Queue FBQ Addr Pos RSQ Addr Pos 0 OAM 408EBD00 132 028BBF60 133 1 UBR CHN0 408ECD00 0028BCF60 0 2 UBR CHN1 408EDD00 0028BDF60 0 3 UBR CHN2 408EED00 0028BEF60 0 4 UBR CHN3 408EFD00 0028BFF60 0 5 VBR/ABR CHN0 408F0D00 8028C0F60 9 6 VBR/ABR CHN1 408F1D00 0028C1F60 0 7 VBR/ABR CHN2 408F2D00 0028C2F60 0 8 VBR/ABR CHN3 408F3D00 0028C3F60 0 9 VBR-RT CHN0 408F4D00 0028C4F60 0 10 VBR-RT CHN1 408F5D00 0028C5F60 0 11 VBR-RT CHN2 408F6D00 0028C6F60 0 12 VBR-RT CHN3 408F7D00 0028C7F60 0 13 SIG 408F8D00 0028C8F60 0 SAR Scheduling channels: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 ATM channel number is 0 Link 0 IMA Info: group index is 99 Tx link id is 0, Tx link state is notInGroup Rx link id is 99, Rx link state is notInGroup Rx link failure status is noFailure, 0 tx failures, 1 rx failures Link 0 Framer Info: framing is Multiframe-CRC4, line code is HDB3, impedance is 120 ohm clock src is line, payload-scrambling is enabled, no loopback line status is 0x420; or Rx LOF, Tx LOMF. port is active, link is unavailable 36213058 idle rx, 1917 correctable hec rx, 309882 uncorrectable hec rx 2248 cells rx, 0 cells tx, 0 rx fifo overrun. Link (0):DS1 MIB DATA: Data in current interval (298 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 331 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 332 Unavail Secs Total Data (last 9 15 minute intervals): 8191 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations, 0 Slip Secs, 8100 Fr Loss Secs, 1 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins, 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 8100 Unavail Secs SAR counter totals across all links and groups: 0 cells output, 0 cells stripped zrh-atm#sh I also include the configuration of the router: sho run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname zrh-atm ! logging buffered 4096 debugging enable secret 5 * ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address ***.***.***.*** 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast ip accounting output-packets duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface ATM1/0 description ATM MCIWORLDCOM Main Interface 2 Mbit/s no ip address no ip directed-broadcast load-interval 60 no atm ilmi-keepalive scrambling-payload impedance 120-ohm ! interface ATM1/0.1 point-to-point description ATM MCIWORLDCOM PVC Link to Walldorf bandwidth 2048 ip address ***.***.***.*** 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast pvc 8/1 vbr-nrt 1854 1854 1 no ilmi manage oam-pvc 60 encapsulation aal5snap ! ! interface ATM1/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown no atm ilmi-keepalive scrambling-payload impedance 120-ohm ! interface ATM1/2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown no atm ilmi-keepalive scrambling-payload impedance 120-ohm ! interface ATM1/3 no ip address no ip d
CCIE CIM
Have anyone in this forum used any of the CIM CD-Rom for preparation for the CCIE? If so, can you say how helpful it is toward preparing for the CCIE? Peace! Ray
Re: what is dark fiber?
Depends on who you are talking to. To me dark fiber means 1. fiber strands that are currently not in use, or 2. private fiber that you or your company has installed, that is not part of the local telephone company's infrastructure. This is how I have been using the term for over 15 years. "Yee, Jason" wrote: > I think dark fibre means a OC3 or OC12 link > > Jason > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > bahadir korkmaz > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 12:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: what is dark fiber? > > hi. > what is dark fiber? > i found some sites that says dark fiber means unused fiber. > is it so? > i think dark fiber must be different then unused fiber. > i mean for example. 10gigabit ethernet runs on dark fiber. > dark must be something related to bandwidth or wavelength. > > if someone knows dark fiber definition i ll be happy. > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN
I am having problem with ISDN connection. Even though I see active Layer 1 & Layer 2status I am unable to ping my local ISDN interface. Router#sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni ISDN BRI0/0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 109, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 111, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Spid Status: TEI 109, ces = 1, state = 8(established) spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 70, tid = 0 TEI 111, ces = 2, state = 8(established) spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 71, tid = 0 Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Activated dsl 0 CCBs = 0 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 Is this any carrier realted problem? What else can I do to troubleshoot this. Thanks... Peter _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
My thoughts on the subject are rather simple. You see alot of IT people with 3, 4, 5, even 6 certs after their name. I am sure you are going to ask these people what real life Cisco experience they have. When an Internetwork Expert signs his name all you see after is CCIE . Do you really need to know more? Jon **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP and ISDN backups
Hi all, Quick question, is it possible to have an ISDN backup router to 3 remote sites , backing up frame-relay cct. on separate routers, without implementing HSRP, and if so, how will the back up router bring up the ISDN link when the frame-relay goes down. I have been told by my boss that implementing HSRP is not a viable option in this situation. EIGRP is the routing protocol. Can anyone plase explain this to me please. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: HSRP problem
I have two 7505 running HSRP and actually have two standby groups in the config - one for use and the second for failover. We have even had it failover once or twice in the 3 years I have worked with it. Our Cicso SE was instrumental in getting it set up and working. I hope this helps. Router 1 - main router interface Ethernet1/0/0 ip address 10.10.10.252 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.11.1 no ip redirects delay 2000 standby 1 priority 100 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication bcbs standby 1 ip 10.10.10.251 standby 2 priority 90 standby 2 preempt standby 2 authentication bcbs standby 2 ip 10.10.10.254 Router 2 - failover interface Ethernet1/0/0 ip address 10.10.10.250 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.11.1 no ip redirects bandwidth 1 delay 2000 standby 1 priority 90 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication bcbs standby 1 ip 10.10.10.251 standby 2 priority 100 standby 2 preempt standby 2 authentication bcbs standby 2 ip 10.10.10.254 > -- > From: Paul Montgomery[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Paul Montgomery > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:54 AM > To: 'Bill O'Brien' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: HSRP problem > > > Bill, > > Thanks for your response. I actually had a group number in an earlier > config. I took it out after looking at a sample config on the cisco > web site > (http://cisco.com/warp/public/619/1.html) > > Either way it didn't work. > > Regards, > > Paul. > > -Original Message- > From: Bill O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 03:43 > To: Paul Montgomery > Subject: Re: HSRP problem > > > Paul, > > I think you need a number after standby to associate a > group so both router know there in the same group > > e0 > > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 > standby 1 preempt > standby 1 priority 100 > > > e0 > > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 > standby 1 preempt > standby 1 priority 200 > > Bill > > > --- Paul Montgomery > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Group, > > > > I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP > > on a couple of 3640s. I > > have set this up using configurations that have been > > working previously. > > Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 > > autosensing switches (separate > > but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or > > segmentation set up on the > > switches. I have set up debugging on the standby on > > both routers. What I see > > is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see the > > incoming hello packets, > > consequently both routers think the other is down > > and therefore takes up > > the active router role. I have tried to do a > > multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 > > which I believe is the multicast group address that > > HSRP uses without > > success. > > > > I have attached the relevent bits of config below. > > > > If anyone could shed any light on this curious > > problem I would be most > > grateful. > > > > > > > > Standby router > > > > standby-router>#sh standby > > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > > Local state is Active, priority 100, may preempt, > > use bia > > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > > Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 > > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > > Active router is local > > Standby router is unknown expired > > Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 > > > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 > > no ip redirects > > ip directed-broadcast > > standby use-bia > > standby priority 100 > > standby preempt > > standby ip 10.10.2.200 > > > > Primary-router>#sh standby > > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > > Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt, > > use bia > > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > > Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 > > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 configured > > Active router is local > > Standby router is unknown expired > > Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 > > > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > description *** Local Area Network Segment *** > > ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 secondary > > ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 > > no ip redirects > > ip directed-broadcast > > standby use-bia > > standby priority 200 preempt > > standby ip 45.10.2.200 > > > > > > > > Paul Montgomery > > Technical Project Manager > > CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCDA > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > > information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more informa
Re: what is dark fiber?
Actually, none of you are right! Here's the only correct and right answer: Dark fiber is when you poke an active SMF strand in your eye and blind yourself in at least 1 eye. Immediately after, you will stumble around in the dark, tripping over the fiber that blinded you, hence the term, "dark fiber."Interestingly enough, the term was coined by a Microsoft employee working on a Nortel switch trying to connect to an IBM PS/2 to print to an Apple LaserWriter. There, I have insulted enough of the industry. On a more serious note, taken from www.whatis.com website: Dark fiber is optical fiber infrastructure (cabling and repeater) that is currently in place but is not being used. Optical fiber conveys information in the form of light pulses so the "dark" means no light pulses are being sent. Dark fiber can refer to infrastructure that is in place but not yet ready to use. For example, some electric utilities have installed optical fiber cable where they already have power lines installed in the expectation that they can lease the infrastructure to telephone or cable TV companies or use it to interconnect their own offices. To the extent that these installations are unused, they are described as dark. "Dark fiber service" is service provided by local exchange carriers (local exchange carrier) for the maintenance of optical fiber transmission capacity between customer locations in which the light for the fiber is provided by the customer rather than the LEC. Works for me! Dark fiber = any piece of INSTALLED fiber not lit up. Your carrier may or may not offer protection against backhoe cowboys who would trench ya fiber right out of the ground...seriously! Fibers, I mean, flames, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charles "Ty Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Depends on who you are talking to. To me dark fiber means 1. fiber strands > that are currently not in use, or 2. private fiber that you or your company > has installed, that is not part of the local telephone company's > infrastructure. > This is how I have been using the term for over 15 years. > > > > "Yee, Jason" wrote: > > > I think dark fibre means a OC3 or OC12 link > > > > Jason > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > bahadir korkmaz > > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 12:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: what is dark fiber? > > > > hi. > > what is dark fiber? > > i found some sites that says dark fiber means unused fiber. > > is it so? > > i think dark fiber must be different then unused fiber. > > i mean for example. 10gigabit ethernet runs on dark fiber. > > dark must be something related to bandwidth or wavelength. > > > > if someone knows dark fiber definition i ll be happy. > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/presentations/dialaccess/index.html Watch the word wrap. Download the "Troubleshooting ISDN" presentation. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ISDN > > > I am having problem with ISDN connection. Even though I see > active Layer 1 & > Layer 2status I am unable to ping my local ISDN interface. > Router#sh isdn stat > Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni > ISDN BRI0/0 interface > dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni > Layer 1 Status: > ACTIVE > Layer 2 Status: > TEI = 109, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = > MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > TEI = 111, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = > MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > Spid Status: > TEI 109, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 70, tid = 0 > TEI 111, ces = 2, state = 8(established) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 sent, spid2 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 71, tid = 0 > Layer 3 Status: > 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) > Activated dsl 0 CCBs = 0 > Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 > > Is this any carrier realted problem? What else can I do to > troubleshoot > this. > > Thanks... > Peter > > __ > ___ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, > create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Protocol Analyzer and Sniffers
Sniffer Pro from NAI can handle ATM OC3-12 Gigabit SX, LX Packet over Sonet and more check them out at www.nai.com p.s. I have no affiliation with them so save the flames --Original Message-- From: Fred Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 7, 2000 7:30:28 PM GMT Subject: Protocol Analyzer and Sniffers Hello group, does anyone know of any Analyzers, probes or sniffers that that would support (DWDM) Division Wave Division Multiplexing, ATM, Sonnet, Gigabit and Fasteternet. Thanks Fred Thomas **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination !!!!!!!!
I totally agree with you Terrence. I do not have the opportunity to work with Cisco Products except AccessPro cards (2). I also just started my own consulting firm, so it is not easy to be able to buy the right equipment to paractice on. (NO $ available right now) I have other certs CNE (3,4,5), MCSE, A+ where I get to practice my skills everyday. I also have CCA but do not get to work on Citrix anymore. Not a lot of firms know about this product Citrix doesn't even have a demo version for labs. All they provide is a virtual demo room in FLA. There is also a time factor. I dedicate my time to working and trying to build a customer base. The time that I can spend in my lab is minimal. When you decide to study certification like Cisco it would be nice that Cisco would let us use their lab. After all we are supporting their products. Wouldn't it make sense for them to want certified people that at least saw their products (inside and out) and have minimal hands on? When I first started this certification I phone my local Cisco office and asked them if they had a lab I could use. I was turned away as if I was crazy. How is a person suppose to get real hands on in Edmonton Alberta? After I get more knowledge (books) I will try to give my time freely to get some experience. Just my two cents. ""Terrence Garrison"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > lets face it. Any Certification that has no lab > can be obtained by an average person with ENOUGH > study. The CCIE can be passed if one has access to > the right equipment. There is NEVER a need to take > a class or have real experience. . .unless of course > you actually want to be good at your job. Having said > that, merely obtaining a cert like the CCNP or MCSE or > CCNA is of some value depending on the depth of the > job one needs to perform and the ability of an individual > to translate theory into practice. Some people can do > this better than others, but it depends on the individual > and have much drive, motivation and determination one > has. In the end, it is drive, motivation and determination > that makes anyone good at whatever it is they do. . .Cert > or not, degree or not, smart or average. > > > >From: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Anyone achieve their CCIE through self study not from work! > >Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:02:35 -0400 > > > >So your telling us you got your CCNP with no experience at all? I > >seriously > >hope not. > > > >Rishard > > > > > >""Wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hiya; > > > > > > Now I finished my CCNP. I should go for the CCIE, > >otherwise > >my > > > ccnp status is just a paperwork. > > > I just wondering does CCIE can be earned through self study, not from > > > working with system integrator? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >___ > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco load director
It seems that your loadbalancing from the inside is not working. You will have to verify that it's working on your internal network first before even trying from the Internet. From the failure to telnet from the inside, that seems to be the case. Anyway, I think your problem might be in the case where you only have 1 interface configured. The way I did it was to bridge the traffic between 2 interfaces so that all traffic from the web servers will have to go through the LD otherwise it can't keep track of what's going on. It's possible in you configuration, the server got the requests but respond directly to the requester and bypassing the LD. My $.02 Henry Ngo ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p99lr$dd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > yes the conduits have been setup .. > > regds > Pushkar > > "andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > you are going from an outside to an inside on the pix, do you have conuits > > on the pix setup? > > > > > > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > hi friends, > > > i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a > > very > > > simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet > > and > > > one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside > on > > > the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i want to load > > > balance ... > > > > > > i have natted the virtual IP in the firewall to a public IP .. and > opened > > > port 80 for incoming hits now this virtual IP is bound to the 2 web > > > servers ... > > > > > > but the prob is that i donot get any inbound connections from outside .. > > > also when i tried to telnet to port 80 of the virtual IP from inside > also > > .. > > > i'm unable to do so ... > > > > > > also i have connected only one ethernet cable from the first ethernet > > > interface on the LAN .. do i have to connect another cable from the > second > > > interface even though they are in the same n/w ?? > > > > > > please can anyone help out ... this is ans SOS situation .. > > > the config file is below .. please take a look ... > > > > > > Pushkar > > > --- > > > : Saved > > > : LocalDirector 416 Version 3.1.4 > > > syslog output 20.3 > > > no syslog console > > > enable password 4d9b64f9ab66474af34252545443b8 encrypted > > > hostname web_ld > > > no shutdown ethernet 0 > > > no shutdown ethernet 1 > > > shutdown ethernet 2 > > > interface ethernet 0 auto > > > interface ethernet 1 auto > > > interface ethernet 2 auto > > > mtu 0 1500 > > > mtu 1 1500 > > > mtu 2 1500 > > > multiring all > > > no secure 0 > > > no secure 1 > > > no secure 2 > > > no ping-allow 0 > > > no ping-allow 1 > > > no ping-allow 2 > > > ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0 > > > no rip passive > > > rip version 1 > > > failover ip address 0.0.0.0 > > > no failover > > > password cisco > > > snmp-server enable traps > > > no snmp-server contact > > > no snmp-server location > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp is > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:443:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp is > > > name 172.16.0.4 web1 > > > name 172.16.0.10 web2 > > > name 172.16.0.253 domain > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp > > > : end > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > > _ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://ww
Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
Well, sometimes, it would be nice if that CCIE would put his Zodiac sign AFTER CCIE . I mean, it would make genuflection so much easier! It's nice to know that Cisco is dedicated to keeping the CCIE valuable in terms of technical prowess and marketability. I wonder if they will reassign the numbers that get "decertified"? It would be cool to become CCIE 1024. LOL Charles ""Jon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8pb07m$gs8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pb07m$gs8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My thoughts on the subject are rather simple. > > You see alot of IT people with 3, 4, 5, even 6 certs after their name. > I am sure you are going to ask these people what real life Cisco experience > they have. > > When an Internetwork Expert signs his name all you see after is CCIE . > > Do you really need to know more? > > Jon > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
Yes, it's true, .1Q adds 4 bytes. The TPID and TCI fields look like this: Tag Protocol Identifier (TPID) 2 bytes - fixed value of 0x8100 16 bits Tag Control Information (TCI) 2 bytes - User Prioroty 3 bits - Canonical FFormat Indicator (CFI) 1 bit - VLAN Identifier 12 bits An Ethernet frame of maximum size (1518 bytes) that gets tagged with .1Q VLAN info is now 4 bytes too big (1522 bytes). This frame is called a "baby giant". Switches can handle the frame correctly, but it may also generate an error statistic. This might not be a big deal unless you have lots of them and you have certain alarm thresholds set in your management system... One other thing - ISL will only encapsulate frames that exit the switch on a trunk port, while .1Q tags get added to all frames (as I recall... somebody might want to check me on this). Dale [=`) >From: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Tom Walstrom'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Ole Drews Jensen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:40:46 -0500 > >Thanks for your reply Tom, > >However, according to the book I'm reading, the 802.1Q DOES change the >frame >size by adding 4 bytes into it. > >Take care, > >Ole > > > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp > > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM >To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > >Ole, > >ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 >byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size >(hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet >frame >to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN >identification information. > >I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one >spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also ISL >allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely to >make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q >where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I >believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further >illuminate this issue. > >Regards, > >Tom > >-Original Message- >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: 802.1Q or ISL > > >Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the end >of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That has >brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some feedback >on this subject. > >I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say >that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets >also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this >scenario. > >The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking >link : ISL or 802.1Q??? > >The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 >bytes to each frame. > >The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply >encapsulates >it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. > >Any comments on this? > >Thanks, > >Ole > >~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >~~ > > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report
RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide
That's a good hypothesis. If the majority of the corporations (network end-users) don't have a need for an employee at the CCIE level (for technology reasons and due to the high salary requirements). Then a CCNP/CCDP with experience at a lower salary requirement makes perfect sense. - Tim Hornbeck -Original Message- From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:53 AM To: vlan 2; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide lol!!! You can't be serious. - >From: Robert Padjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Might it also mean that people are finding that the >certification is not as important in this market and >that the 'lower' level certifications, along with >'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to >corporations and providers? > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM deaming/line encoding problem
I'm running 11.1 IOS so configs may have changed. The lack of map-group and associated map-list is one difference between the configs. interface ATM12/0 description Location TGE. Always node 1. no ip address ! interface ATM12/0.1 multipoint description pvc to TGN ip address xxx.yyy.7.249 255.255.255.252 secondary ip address 10.18.35.1 255.255.255.0 map-group TGE appletalk cable-range 35-35 35.1 appletalk zone ATM atm pvc 1 0 35 aal5snap map-list TGE ip 10.18.35.4 atm-vc 1 broadcast appletalk 35.4 atm-vc 1 broadcast ip xxx.yyy.7.250 atm-vc 1 broadcast > -Original Message- > From: Hans Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ATM deaming/line encoding problem > > > Hello colleagues, > > I have a problem with my ATM connection from my Cisco router > to a Cisco BPX > ATM switch. When I look at the line on the switch, the line > status is ok. > When I run the 'sh cont atm 1/0' command, I get the following > output (maybe > anybody as an idea on where the error could be); I know this > is going to be > a very long mail, but I can't help it: > > zrh-atm#sh contr atm1/0 > Interface ATM1/0 is down > Hardware is ATM E1 > LANE client MAC address is 0002.4b76.0dd0 > hwidb=0x81472004, ds=0x8148C564 > slot 1, unit 0, subunit 0 > rs8234 base 0x4080, slave base 0x4080 > rs8234 ds 0x8148C564 > SBDs - avail 2048, guaranteed 1, unguaranteed 2047, starved 0 > Seg VCC table 4080B800, Shadow Seg VCC Table 814A8380, VCD Table > 814BE3AC > Schedule table 40816800, Shadow Schedule table 814C43D8, Size 7CD > RSM VCC Table 4082BD00, Shadow RSM VCC Table 814C9414 > VPI Index Table 40829280, VCI Index Table 4082B900 > Bucket2 Table 40820480, Shadow Bucket2 Table 814C6338 > MCR Limit Table 40820880, Shadow MCR Table 814C7F64 > ABR template 40820A80, Shadow template 811FF798 > RM Cell RS Queue 40829900 > Queue TXQ Addr Pos StQ Addr Pos > 0 UBR CHN0 40825A80 0028B4EA0 0 > 1 UBR CHN1 40825E80 0028B56A0 0 > 2 UBR CHN2 40826280 0028B5EA0 0 > 3 UBR CHN3 40826680 0028B66A0 0 > 4 VBR/ABR CHN0 40826A80 0028B6EA0 0 > 5 VBR/ABR CHN1 40826E80 0028B76A0 0 > 6 VBR/ABR CHN2 40827280 0028B7EA0 0 > 7 VBR/ABR CHN3 40827680 0028B86A0 0 > 8 VBR-RT CHN0 40827A80 0028B8EA0 0 > 9 VBR-RT CHN1 40827E80 0028B96A0 0 > 10 VBR-RT CHN2 40828280 0028B9EA0 0 > 11 VBR-RT CHN3 40828680 0028BA6A0 0 > 12 SIG 40828A80 0028BAEA0 0 > 13 VPD 40828E80 0028BB6A0 0 > > Queue FBQ Addr Pos RSQ Addr Pos > 0 OAM 408EBD00 132 028BBF60 133 > 1 UBR CHN0 408ECD00 0028BCF60 0 > 2 UBR CHN1 408EDD00 0028BDF60 0 > 3 UBR CHN2 408EED00 0028BEF60 0 > 4 UBR CHN3 408EFD00 0028BFF60 0 > 5 VBR/ABR CHN0 408F0D00 8028C0F60 9 > 6 VBR/ABR CHN1 408F1D00 0028C1F60 0 > 7 VBR/ABR CHN2 408F2D00 0028C2F60 0 > 8 VBR/ABR CHN3 408F3D00 0028C3F60 0 > 9 VBR-RT CHN0 408F4D00 0028C4F60 0 > 10 VBR-RT CHN1 408F5D00 0028C5F60 0 > 11 VBR-RT CHN2 408F6D00 0028C6F60 0 > 12 VBR-RT CHN3 408F7D00 0028C7F60 0 > 13 SIG 408F8D00 0028C8F60 0 > SAR Scheduling channels: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 > ATM channel number is 0 > Link 0 IMA Info: >group index is 99 >Tx link id is 0, Tx link state is notInGroup >Rx link id is 99, Rx link state is notInGroup > Rx link failure status is noFailure, > 0 tx failures, 1 rx failures > Link 0 Framer Info: > framing is Multiframe-CRC4, line code is HDB3, impedance > is 120 ohm > clock src is line, payload-scrambling is enabled, no loopback > line status is 0x420; or Rx LOF, Tx LOMF. > port is active, link is unavailable > 36213058 idle rx, 1917 correctable hec rx, 309882 > uncorrectable hec > rx > 2248 cells rx, 0 cells tx, 0 rx fifo overrun. > Link (0):DS1 MIB DATA: > Data in current interval (298 seconds elapsed): > 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations > 0 Slip Secs, 331 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins > 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, > 332 Unavail > Secs > Total Data (last 9 15 minute intervals): > 8191 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations, > 0 Slip Secs, 8100 Fr Loss Secs, 1 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins, > 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 8100 > Unavail Secs > SAR counter totals across all links and groups: >0 cells output, 0 cells stripped > > zrh-atm#sh > > I also include the configuration of the router: > > sho run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > service password-encryption > ! > hostname zrh-atm > ! > logging buffered 4096 debugging > enable secret 5 * > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip su
Switch 2901 Password Recovery - Pls help !!
Hi, I have lost my password for Cisco 2901 Switch. Can someone please tell me how to do a password recovery for Cisco 2901 Swich? Thanks for your help !!! Rgds, Ash **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide)
PS - in reply to Chris Hagen - the recert process involves only a written exam, you don't have to take the lab again... It's true about the discounts... there is much motivation on the part of Cisco partners to keep CCIE's current and on staff. What I wanna know is, when a CCIE retires, do they retire his number too (like with sports heroes)??? >From: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dick Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:29:48 -0700 > >I have heard that Cisco significantly discounts the proice of support >contracts to companies with current CCIEs. If this is true it is one >reason >why keeping the cert current increases marketability. >Nathan Miller > >-Original Message- >From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:21 PM >To: Chris Hagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > >/ >Another question is...Has an employer ever asked "is your CCIE current"? >\ >-Original Message- >From: Chris Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:12 PM >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > > >Well, if it costs $1,000 to take the lab again, which involves hours and > >hours of studying, and you go to a client and say, I'm CCIE and I >let > >my certifications lapse, but here's what I've been doing for the past X > >number of years > > > > Do you really need those 4 letters anymore with most companies with that > >level of experience? I mean, if it is out of date, it hasn't really been > >long enough to be REALLY out of date... > > > >*plink plink* > > > >-Chris > > > > > >"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> Bollocks. > >> By definition a CCIE is the best when it comes to real world >experience. > >> > >> > >> "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > Might it also mean that people are finding that the > >> > certification is not as important in this market and > >> > that the 'lower' level certifications, along with > >> > 'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to > >> > corporations and providers? > >> > > >> > > >> > --- "Healis, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > This could be due to people not passing > >> > > re-certification exams, failing to > >> > > schedule the re-cert exam in time, death, or even > >> > > worse Breaking Cisco's > >> > > NDA!! > >> > > > >> > > Jim Healis, CCDP, CCNP > >> > > Senior Network Administrator > >> > > Virata > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -Original Message- > >> > > From: Daniel Ji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:47 PM > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > >> > > > >> > > I guess that's good news for all of us who are > >> > > trying damn hard to be a > >> > > CCIE. After all, the less # worldwide, the more > >> > > value this cert will have. > >> > > it's all just simple "supply vs demand". > >> > > > >> > > Good luck to all! > >> > > > >> > > Daniel > >> > > Lab in Dec > >> > > > >> > > ""andy lennon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > > 8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go > >> > > down... > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > >> > > > > >> > > > Andy Lennon > >> > > > > >> > > > ccnp/dp/mcse > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ___ > >> > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com > >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > >> > > information go to > >> > > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > >> > > _ > >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com > >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > >> > > information go to > >> > > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > >> > > _ > >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Re: Academy CCNA2 structure
I took the network acad 1.0 track, did some studying on my own, i.e. the 1900 switch documentation off the cisco web site. passed the test without a hitch, your mileage may vary. Alf wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'd appreciate anyones help / advice / comments concerning the new CCNA2 > Cisco Academy course structure and what is purported to be within the exam. > I am an Academy student and about to take my exam. The curriculum doesn't go > into CLI for the 1900 switch yet the exam is meant to cover and ask > questions on this topic. Can anyone advise why this is? > > Regards > > Alf > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Higher than CCIE...
What are these sesame street Certs. Get real Certifications my friend. >From: "Check your mail!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Check your mail!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Higher than CCIE... >Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 05:21:58 -0500 > >IF you only KNEW!! >Rob Mears III, NNCSS, NNCDS, CCNA, MCSE+I, CNE4&5, A+ >Technical Mercenary > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Hobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 12:37 AM > > To: Check your mail!; Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:RE: Higher than CCIE... > > > > Get a life! Get your CCIE and then buy a dog and enjoy life - you sound > > like a cert freak who is never satisified until you have every cert in >the > > industry. > > > > Or go to work for Cisco - or just go to work period and use what certs >you > > do have. > > > > jh > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:46 AM > > To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:RE: Higher than CCIE... > > > > Do you think Cisco is the only certification out their? Come on all, > > look at the big picture and stop worshiping these CCIE types. > > > > Rob > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 10:56 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:RE: Higher than CCIE... > > > > > > The title should be more like Elevated Cisco Internetworking > > Deity, ( El CID ) > > > > > > One Certification to rule them all > > One Certification to find them > > One Certification to bring them all > > And in the Networks bind them > > In the Land Of Cisco, where the Routers lie > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:56 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:Higher than CCIE... > > > > Hey Group, > > I was pondering this thought. If the rate of > > CCIE's is rising at a fast pace than I think it would be cool if Cisco > > created a new cert. The way to obtain this one would be to pass all >three > > CCIE tests. From what I know there is only one person in the world who >has > > all three... I think his name is Brendan Ta or something. They could >name > > the cert: CCID (Cisco certified internetwork director), or something >like > > (and this is my favorite): CCIG (Cisco certified internetwork guru) :) > > Don't think they would use that one though, :) This type of cert would, > > in my eyes, deem you as a true master of the matrix, if you know what I > > mean...just a though. Maybe we can get some good responses on this > > one...Have a good one group. > > > > P.S. I would like if Priscilla O. and Todd L. could > > also comment on this topic...thanks. :) > > > > Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA > > E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ~Internetwork Essentials~ > > "Complete Solutions for Complex Networks" > > ><< winmail.dat >> _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win2k SNMP Traffic
Windows 2K does not enable SNMP by default. Dell is doing that so that their server monitoring software will get messages from the servers warning you when a fan slows down, a power supply starts to regulate out of spec or a RAID controller reports a container member problem. Stopping and disabling SNMP in services will stop the snmp traffic but will cause all the Dell monitoring applications to report problems initializing. Also, this has nothing to do with network neighborhood browsing. Putting those systems in a different domain or workgroup will make them less obvious. A different domain without a trust relationship will give some security against access. Vern Stitt ASE, CCA, CCNA, MCSE "Deepak Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok here's the scenario. Multiple branch offices,( LAN, WAN> slowest 56k and fastest oc3) and cisco routers from 1900's to 3600's ) PDC, and a whole lota BDC's. NT 4.0 PDC and BDCs; still wanna see the those computers when I go into network neighbor hood. BT.Dell is now shipping all there new Pc's with win2k professional, and refuse to go back to win9x for me. (( ba*tards))this causes me to have alota headache, cause win2k has SNMP traffic enabled by Default when we get them...and now I can start to see all the new win2k machines in network neighbor hood. This is a problem due to security reasons and management and blah blah blah...and there's NO possible way I can go, or tell the techy there to go to disable SNMP traffic on all the new comps!!!I was thinking about goin to all the branch offices and config. the routers to block snmp traffic ( port 161 off the top of my head ), So is there any way i can block SNMP traffic on win2k professional from the routers..cause i still wanna see the pdc and bdc's.but this is not too important...I just REALLY need to stop those win2k machines from appearing on network neighborhood " access-list 100 deny snmp win2kpro" hahah thanks Deepak Sharma MSCE CCNA ACT A+ Ceridian Canada Ltd. -- \\|// (o o) oOOo-(_)-oOOo *@ bcz finest @* ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
But I think it's more like: A: Pull a big trash bag over their head B: Stuff a lunch bad in their shirt pocket and then after either case, weigh them (CRC). Again, you might want to consider how often you will do each thing. You may only need to pull bags over the heads of 250 people going out the front door, and ignore the other 750 people who are going into different rooms of the house - as opposed to stuffing lunch bags in the pockets of all 1000 regardless of where they are going... Dale [=`) >From: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Howard C. Berkowitz'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 10:05:41 -0500 > >I hate martini Howard. > >Anyway, I believe I mean the latency in the switch. > >It's kind of, what would be the fastest thing to do: > >A) Put a large overcoat on and button 30 buttons. > > or > >B) Take your coat off, put a vest on with 4 buttons, and put the coat back >on - (no buttons on the coat). > >Now consider a line of 1000 guests waiting for you to do A or B on them. >What method would be the fastest to get these people out the door so you >could go to bed? > >Have a great weekend, > >Ole > >~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >~~ > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:34 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > > >Thanks for your reply Tom, > > > >However, according to the book I'm reading, the 802.1Q DOES change the >frame > >size by adding 4 bytes into it. > > > >Take care, > > > >Ole > > From the horse's mouth, 802.1Q: > > >9.1 Overview >Tagging a frame requires: >a) The addition of a Tag Header to the frame. This header is inserted >immediately following the Desti-nation >MAC address and Source MAC address (and Routing, if present) fields >of the frame to be >transmitted; > > >To return to your original question, Ole, when you speak of >optimizing resource use, what do you consider the scarce resource? >Other than in the martini-soaked brain (if I may use the term) of an >overly zealous salesdroid, you can't optimize for everything at once. >Save me from "specialists in all cars, foreign and domestic." > >Some optimizations could include: > > Bandwidth overhead > Frame length > Overhead frames (BPDU, for example) > Latency in the switch > Input serialization > Processing > Internal forwarding > Output serialization > Ease of use > Interoperability > >Which do you want to optimize? > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM > >To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > > > > >Ole, > > > >ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a 26 byte header and a 4 > >byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not change the frame size > >(hence its interoperability, because it appears as a standard ethernet >frame > >to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the existing frame with VLAN > >identification information. > > > >I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL is that it runs one > >spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one spanning tree. Also >ISL > >allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this would be more likely >to > >make a difference on the network. I would think you would only do 802.1Q > >where interoperability was the issue, like with a Catalyst 4000 which I > >believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch guru could further > >illuminate this issue. > > > >Regards, > > > >Tom > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM > > > >Just a thought. - Digging through another book towards the light at the >end > >of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to my knowledge. That >has > >brought this question up in my mind, so I would like to hear some >feedback > >on this subject. > > > >I know that much of this depends on the average frame sizes, so lets say > >that I have analyzed my network, and the average frame size is 800. Lets > >also say that we are only dealing with Cisco Catalyst switches in this > >scenario. > > > >The question is, what would be least resource-waste to use as a trunking > >link : ISL or 802.1Q??? > > > >The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify it, but it adds only 4 > >bytes to each frame. > > > >The ISL does not have to break the frame open because it simply >encapsulates > >it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each frame. > > > >Any comments on this? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Ole > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-An
LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated?
This question could probably best be answered by someone working for a service provider. (I currently work on the enterprise) When three or more lmi requests sent from the router to the central office switch are missed the c.o. switch will either delete or inactivate the pvc. Can someone explain to me the difference between a deleted pvc and an inactived one? What is happening on the telco side. Also, a url link to Cisco's documentation on this one would be helpful. (I tried a search but can't seem to pinpoint the area)
Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination !!!!!!!!
Daniel - since you just started your own consulting firm, become a Cisco reseller. Once you get a few entry level certs (CCNA, CCDA, Sales Expert), you will find that Cisco will be very accomodating in terms of resources and practice labs, etc. They offer a lot of stuff to their partners to help them get certified. Right now they have a promotion where partners can take certification classes at $500 instead of the usual $1200 - $1800... There is even a special 2 for 1 deal (2 classes for $500). Cisco has a program called ASET (Advanced System Engineer Training) which you can take in San Jose. It looks and feels just like the actual lab exam, except that there is a CCIE there to help you, and you can talk amongst the others there to find solutiuons to the problems you encounter... Become a Cisco partner - it is worth the effort... Dale [=`) >From: "Daniel Boutet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Daniel Boutet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:50:06 -0600 > >I totally agree with you Terrence. I do not have the opportunity to work >with Cisco Products except AccessPro cards (2). >I also just started my own consulting firm, so it is not easy to be able to >buy the right equipment to paractice on. (NO $ available right now) > >I have other certs CNE (3,4,5), MCSE, A+ where I get to practice my skills >everyday. >I also have CCA but do not get to work on Citrix anymore. Not a lot of >firms >know about this product Citrix doesn't even have a demo version for labs. >All they provide is a virtual demo room in FLA. > >There is also a time factor. I dedicate my time to working and trying to >build a customer base. The time that I can spend in my lab is minimal. >When you decide to study certification like Cisco it would be nice that >Cisco would let us use their lab. After all we are supporting their >products. >Wouldn't it make sense for them to want certified people that at least saw >their products (inside and out) and have minimal hands on? > >When I first started this certification I phone my local Cisco office and >asked them if they had a lab I could use. I was turned away as if I was >crazy. >How is a person suppose to get real hands on in Edmonton Alberta? After I >get more knowledge (books) I will try to give my time freely to get >some >experience. > >Just my two cents. > > > > >""Terrence Garrison"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > lets face it. Any Certification that has no lab > > can be obtained by an average person with ENOUGH > > study. The CCIE can be passed if one has access to > > the right equipment. There is NEVER a need to take > > a class or have real experience. . .unless of course > > you actually want to be good at your job. Having said > > that, merely obtaining a cert like the CCNP or MCSE or > > CCNA is of some value depending on the depth of the > > job one needs to perform and the ability of an individual > > to translate theory into practice. Some people can do > > this better than others, but it depends on the individual > > and have much drive, motivation and determination one > > has. In the end, it is drive, motivation and determination > > that makes anyone good at whatever it is they do. . .Cert > > or not, degree or not, smart or average. > > > > > > >From: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: Anyone achieve their CCIE through self study not from >work! > > >Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:02:35 -0400 > > > > > >So your telling us you got your CCNP with no experience at all? I > > >seriously > > >hope not. > > > > > >Rishard > > > > > > > > >""Wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > >8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hiya; > > > > > > > > Now I finished my CCNP. I should go for the CCIE, > > >otherwise > > >my > > > > ccnp status is just a paperwork. > > > > I just wondering does CCIE can be earned through self study, not >from > > > > working with system integrator? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > >___ > > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >_ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > >
RE: 802.1Q or ISL
C ) Offer them a Martini on there way out :) flem --- Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hate martini Howard. > > Anyway, I believe I mean the latency in the switch. > > It's kind of, what would be the fastest thing to do: > > A) Put a large overcoat on and button 30 buttons. > > or > > B) Take your coat off, put a vest on with 4 buttons, > and put the coat back > on - (no buttons on the coat). > > Now consider a line of 1000 guests waiting for you > to do A or B on them. > What method would be the fastest to get these people > out the door so you > could go to bed? > > Have a great weekend, > > Ole > > ~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~ > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > > >Thanks for your reply Tom, > > > >However, according to the book I'm reading, the > 802.1Q DOES change the > frame > >size by adding 4 bytes into it. > > > >Take care, > > > >Ole > > From the horse's mouth, 802.1Q: > > > 9.1 Overview > Tagging a frame requires: > a) The addition of a Tag Header to the frame. This > header is inserted > immediately following the Desti-nation > MAC address and Source MAC address (and Routing, if > present) fields > of the frame to be > transmitted; > > > To return to your original question, Ole, when you > speak of > optimizing resource use, what do you consider the > scarce resource? > Other than in the martini-soaked brain (if I may use > the term) of an > overly zealous salesdroid, you can't optimize for > everything at once. > Save me from "specialists in all cars, foreign and > domestic." > > Some optimizations could include: > > Bandwidth overhead > Frame length > Overhead frames (BPDU, for example) > Latency in the switch > Input serialization > Processing > Internal forwarding > Output serialization > Ease of use > Interoperability > > Which do you want to optimize? > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Tom Walstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:30 AM > >To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: 802.1Q or ISL > > > > > >Ole, > > > >ISL encapsulates the frame adding, as you said, a > 26 byte header and a 4 > >byte CRC trailer. 802.1Q frame-tagging does not > change the frame size > >(hence its interoperability, because it appears as > a standard ethernet > frame > >to non-802.1Q devices), but does modify the > existing frame with VLAN > >identification information. > > > >I would suspect that the real reason to deploy ISL > is that it runs one > >spanning tree per vlan where 802.1Q runs only one > spanning tree. Also ISL > >allows bonding into etherchannels. Seems like this > would be more likely to > >make a difference on the network. I would think > you would only do 802.1Q > >where interoperability was the issue, like with a > Catalyst 4000 which I > >believe only supports 802.1Q. Maybe some switch > guru could further > >illuminate this issue. > > > >Regards, > > > >Tom > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Ole Drews Jensen > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:38 PM > > > >Just a thought. - Digging through another book > towards the light at the end > >of the tunnel, I have now added VLAN Trunc Links to > my knowledge. That has > >brought this question up in my mind, so I would > like to hear some feedback > >on this subject. > > > >I know that much of this depends on the average > frame sizes, so lets say > >that I have analyzed my network, and the average > frame size is 800. Lets > >also say that we are only dealing with Cisco > Catalyst switches in this > >scenario. > > > >The question is, what would be least resource-waste > to use as a trunking > >link : ISL or 802.1Q??? > > > >The 802.1Q has to break the frame open to modify > it, but it adds only 4 > >bytes to each frame. > > > >The ISL does not have to break the frame open > because it simply > encapsulates > >it into a new one, but it adds 30 bytes to each > frame. > > > >Any comments on this? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Ole > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.ht
RE: Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide)
I was at Cisco for an interview and the paraded me through the CiscoTown Hall of Fame where the numbers are each framed, stuck on the way and lighted by one single light. -Original Message- From: Dale Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide) PS - in reply to Chris Hagen - the recert process involves only a written exam, you don't have to take the lab again... It's true about the discounts... there is much motivation on the part of Cisco partners to keep CCIE's current and on staff. What I wanna know is, when a CCIE retires, do they retire his number too (like with sports heroes)??? >From: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dick Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:29:48 -0700 > >I have heard that Cisco significantly discounts the proice of support >contracts to companies with current CCIEs. If this is true it is one >reason >why keeping the cert current increases marketability. >Nathan Miller > >-Original Message- >From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:21 PM >To: Chris Hagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > >/ >Another question is...Has an employer ever asked "is your CCIE current"? >\ >-Original Message- >From: Chris Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:12 PM >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > > >Well, if it costs $1,000 to take the lab again, which involves hours and > >hours of studying, and you go to a client and say, I'm CCIE and I >let > >my certifications lapse, but here's what I've been doing for the past X > >number of years > > > > Do you really need those 4 letters anymore with most companies with that > >level of experience? I mean, if it is out of date, it hasn't really been > >long enough to be REALLY out of date... > > > >*plink plink* > > > >-Chris > > > > > >"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> Bollocks. > >> By definition a CCIE is the best when it comes to real world >experience. > >> > >> > >> "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > Might it also mean that people are finding that the > >> > certification is not as important in this market and > >> > that the 'lower' level certifications, along with > >> > 'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to > >> > corporations and providers? > >> > > >> > > >> > --- "Healis, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > This could be due to people not passing > >> > > re-certification exams, failing to > >> > > schedule the re-cert exam in time, death, or even > >> > > worse Breaking Cisco's > >> > > NDA!! > >> > > > >> > > Jim Healis, CCDP, CCNP > >> > > Senior Network Administrator > >> > > Virata > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -Original Message- > >> > > From: Daniel Ji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:47 PM > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > >> > > > >> > > I guess that's good news for all of us who are > >> > > trying damn hard to be a > >> > > CCIE. After all, the less # worldwide, the more > >> > > value this cert will have. > >> > > it's all just simple "supply vs demand". > >> > > > >> > > Good luck to all! > >> > > > >> > > Daniel > >> > > Lab in Dec > >> > > > >> > > ""andy lennon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > > 8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go > >> > > down... > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > >> > > > > >> > > > Andy Lennon > >> > > > > >> > > > ccnp/dp/mcse > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ___ > >> > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com > >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > >> > > information go to > >> > > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > >> > > _ > >> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com > >> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >>
Learning ATM via Frame Relay
Hi, all, I attended a Cisco ATM class a few weeks at Global Knowledge (top notch instructor, Mario Bigotti, ask for him by name). I not only learned ATM, and felt very comfortable.. I realized that my knowing frame relay, especially configuing my big *ss AGS+ as a frame relay switch, really helped me to understand the concepts, configuration of ATM! Several years ago, I took a BISDN/ATM course: I stunk. ATM was mind boggling, I could not follow the lecture at all; the instructor gave me a shiny ball to play with so that I would not distburb the class. Not coincdentally, at the time, I thought frame relay was something that airplanes had. Since then, I have mastered frame relay, and this ATM course was a snap! In a sense, you can learn ATM indirectly by mastering frame relay: VPI/VCI are just like DLCI, PVC and SVC mean the same thing. A frame relay switch operates similar to an ATM switch. My nickname for ATM is now "Kick *ss Frame Relay." This has been a unpaid public service announcement. Flames to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH, Charles **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch 2901 Password Recovery - Pls help !!
Go here... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml Dale [=`) >From: Ashfaq Aslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Ashfaq Aslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Switch 2901 Password Recovery - Pls help !! >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 00:32:26 +0100 > >Hi, > >I have lost my password for Cisco 2901 Switch. Can someone please tell >me how to do a password recovery for Cisco 2901 Swich? > >Thanks for your help !!! > >Rgds, >Ash > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco load director
hi, i can ping the servers from the PIX , but not the virtual IP ... the servers are not directly plugged in the LD .. there is a common switch for the LD interface,the PIX internal interface and the servers as they all are in the sane network. one thing i want is that should i plug in one more interface of the LD in the same network as right now i have only one interface into this network. regds Pushkar "Jeffrey Eiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:8pb024$fo2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I didn't notice anything obviously wrong with your config. This may sound > obvious, but the LD uses a regular old NIC. If your servers are plugged > directly into the LD, you must use a crossover cable. For troubleshooting > only, allow any port to pass through the local director. Then lock it down > to 80/443 after everything is working. Try ping your servers from the LD, > and try to ping the LD from the PIX DMZ interface. Do a 'show real' and > 'show virtual' to get some better info than the config. > > Let me know how you do from here. > > Jeff > > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hi friends, > > i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a > very > > simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet > and > > one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside on > > the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i want to load > > balance ... > > > > i have natted the virtual IP in the firewall to a public IP .. and opened > > port 80 for incoming hits now this virtual IP is bound to the 2 web > > servers ... > > > > but the prob is that i donot get any inbound connections from outside .. > > also when i tried to telnet to port 80 of the virtual IP from inside also > .. > > i'm unable to do so ... > > > > also i have connected only one ethernet cable from the first ethernet > > interface on the LAN .. do i have to connect another cable from the second > > interface even though they are in the same n/w ?? > > > > please can anyone help out ... this is ans SOS situation .. > > the config file is below .. please take a look ... > > > > Pushkar > > --- > > : Saved > > : LocalDirector 416 Version 3.1.4 > > syslog output 20.3 > > no syslog console > > enable password 4d9b64f9ab66474af34252545443b8 encrypted > > hostname web_ld > > no shutdown ethernet 0 > > no shutdown ethernet 1 > > shutdown ethernet 2 > > interface ethernet 0 auto > > interface ethernet 1 auto > > interface ethernet 2 auto > > mtu 0 1500 > > mtu 1 1500 > > mtu 2 1500 > > multiring all > > no secure 0 > > no secure 1 > > no secure 2 > > no ping-allow 0 > > no ping-allow 1 > > no ping-allow 2 > > ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0 > > no rip passive > > rip version 1 > > failover ip address 0.0.0.0 > > no failover > > password cisco > > snmp-server enable traps > > no snmp-server contact > > no snmp-server location > > virtual 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp is > > virtual 172.16.0.253:443:0:tcp is > > real 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp is > > real 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp is > > name 172.16.0.4 web1 > > name 172.16.0.10 web2 > > name 172.16.0.253 domain > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp > > : end > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: HSRP problem
HSRP will use a default group number if you don't configure one . Everything points to the switches , get the routers on the same physical media and I will be very surprised if your config would not work . flem --- David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two 7505 running HSRP and actually have two > standby groups in the > config - one for use and the second for failover. > We have even had it > failover once or twice in the 3 years I have worked > with it. Our Cicso > SE was instrumental in getting it set up and > working. I hope this > helps. > > Router 1 - main router > > interface Ethernet1/0/0 > ip address 10.10.10.252 255.255.255.0 > ip helper-address 10.10.11.1 > no ip redirects > delay 2000 > standby 1 priority 100 > standby 1 preempt > standby 1 authentication bcbs > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.251 > standby 2 priority 90 > standby 2 preempt > standby 2 authentication bcbs > standby 2 ip 10.10.10.254 > > Router 2 - failover > > interface Ethernet1/0/0 > ip address 10.10.10.250 255.255.255.0 > ip helper-address 10.10.11.1 > no ip redirects > bandwidth 1 > delay 2000 > standby 1 priority 90 > standby 1 preempt > standby 1 authentication bcbs > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.251 > standby 2 priority 100 > standby 2 preempt > standby 2 authentication bcbs > standby 2 ip 10.10.10.254 > > > -- > > From: Paul > Montgomery[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Reply To: Paul Montgomery > > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:54 AM > > To: 'Bill O'Brien' > > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject:RE: HSRP problem > > > > > > Bill, > > > > Thanks for your response. I actually had a group > number in an earlier > > config. I took it out after looking at a sample > config on the cisco > > web site > > (http://cisco.com/warp/public/619/1.html) > > > > Either way it didn't work. > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 03:43 > > To: Paul Montgomery > > Subject: Re: HSRP problem > > > > > > Paul, > > > > I think you need a number after standby to > associate a > > group so both router know there in the same group > > > > e0 > > > > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 > > standby 1 preempt > > standby 1 priority 100 > > > > > > e0 > > > > standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1 > > standby 1 preempt > > standby 1 priority 200 > > > > Bill > > > > > > --- Paul Montgomery > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear Group, > > > > > > I am experiencing difficulty with implementing > HSRP > > > on a couple of 3640s. I > > > have set this up using configurations that have > been > > > working previously. > > > Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 > > > autosensing switches (separate > > > but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or > > > segmentation set up on the > > > switches. I have set up debugging on the standby > on > > > both routers. What I see > > > is only the outgoing hello packets. I do not see > the > > > incoming hello packets, > > > consequently both routers think the other is > down > > > and therefore takes up > > > the active router role. I have tried to do a > > > multicast ping to 224.0.0.2 > > > which I believe is the multicast group address > that > > > HSRP uses without > > > success. > > > > > > I have attached the relevent bits of config > below. > > > > > > If anyone could shed any light on this curious > > > problem I would be most > > > grateful. > > > > > > > > > > > > Standby router > > > > > > standby-router>#sh standby > > > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > > > Local state is Active, priority 100, may > preempt, > > > use bia > > > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > > > Next hello sent in 00:00:02.556 > > > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 > configured > > > Active router is local > > > Standby router is unknown expired > > > Standby virtual mac address is 0010.7b44.cf41 > > > > > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > > ip address 10.10.2.209 255.0.0.0 > > > no ip redirects > > > ip directed-broadcast > > > standby use-bia > > > standby priority 100 > > > standby preempt > > > standby ip 10.10.2.200 > > > > > > Primary-router>#sh standby > > > Ethernet0/0 - Group 0 > > > Local state is Active, priority 200, may > preempt, > > > use bia > > > Hellotime 3 holdtime 10 > > > Next hello sent in 00:00:01.338 > > > Hot standby IP address is 10.10.2.200 > configured > > > Active router is local > > > Standby router is unknown expired > > > Standby virtual mac address is 0030.947e.d480 > > > > > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > > description *** Local Area Network Segment *** > > > ip address 172.31.72.200 255.255.255.0 > secondary > > > ip address 10.10.2.207 255.0.0.0 > > > no ip redirects > > > ip directed-broadcast > > > standby use-bia > > > standby priority 200 preempt > > > standby ip 45.10.2.200 > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Montgomery > > > Technical Project Manager > > > CNE, MCP, CCNA, CCD
RE: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated?
VC status set to inactive indicates the connection between the local router and frame relay switch is working, but there is no connection between the remote router and the frame relay switch. A deleted VC occurs when the local router is unable to establish frame relay service with the frame relay switch. Inactive - local works, remote doesn't. Deleted - local doesn't - no opportunity to find out about the remote. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carter, Mark Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated? This question could probably best be answered by someone working for a service provider. (I currently work on the enterprise) When three or more lmi requests sent from the router to the central office switch are missed the c.o. switch will either delete or inactivate the pvc. Can someone explain to me the difference between a deleted pvc and an inactived one? What is happening on the telco side. Also, a url link to Cisco's documentation on this one would be helpful. (I tried a search but can't seem to pinpoint the area) **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAC Address support for c1900 series
I was looking at the specs and it says that it supports 1024 MAC address. My understanding is that it is what the CAM table will support at one time. But the specs also states: "Unlimited MAC addresses support on configurable network port" This, I don't get. Can anyone explain? Thanks **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP Telephony book!
Follow the link, after answering the questionnaire, for cco guest instead of login in. You can always apply for a CCO membeship account as a reseller! "FREDL L AZARES" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can I get one if I don't have a customer code? > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:35:11 -0600 "Daniel Boutet" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I had quite a few replies sent to my personal address. Please if you > > have > > any questions reply to the group. > > Someone else in the group might be interested. > > > > As far as the Free IP Telephony book: by doing a search in the > > archives I > > came up with: > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/lm/buffer/offer/govgameplan/1371_gov_jump/V > 458 > > -100S1 > > > > I think that the last person to post this link was Ed Farmer. So > > Thank you > > Ed! > > > > > > > > ""Daniel Boutet"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 8p87he$bpv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p87he$bpv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Now I can say that some things are free. I just received my FREE > > IP > > > Telephony book.by Gorolski & Kolon. > > > Anyone read it yet? Care to comment.? > > > > > > Thanks to the GROUP for the link and to Cisco for the book! > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go > > to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using BGP: technical questions needing clarification
Title: Using BGP: technical questions needing clarification Hi, all. I've done quite a bit of reading on BGP Routing and still have some gray areas. 1. Loopback address - if this isn't assigned to a Physical interface, how exactly does this "eliminate dependency that would otherwise occur when you use the IP address of a physical interface to configure BGP" when the Physical connection itself between BGP peers go down? What scenario would give you a practical use out of loopback address? 2. Using a Route Map to set the Weight attribute - what are the range of values you can use? 3. BGP Route Map filtering - consider this configuration: !Router C router bgp 300 network 170.10.0.0 neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 200 neighbor 3.3.3.3 route-map STAMP in route-map STAMP permit 10 match as-path 1 set weight 20 ! route-map STAMP permit 20 match as-path 2 ! route-map STAMP permit 30 set weight 10 ! ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^200$ ip as-path access-list 2 deny _400_ Since only ^200$ is specifically permitted, this still results in all other AS's being denied, right? So isn't the last entry unnecessary in this config? 3. Load Balancing over Parallel Serial Lines - consider this config: !Router A interface loopback 0 ip address 150.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 100 neighbor 160.10.1.1 remote-as 200 neighbor 160.10.1.1 ebgp-multihop neighbor 160.10.1.1 update-source loopback 0 network 150.10.0.0 ! ip route 160.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 1.1.1.2 ip route 160.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 2.2.2.2 Is it safe to say that all this does is allow the Router to UTILIZE the 2 serial lines? Isn't it true that it can't determine how much of each line's bandwidth to use at any given time? If so, all this does then is perform some kind of "Round-robin" utilizaton of the 2 parallel lines? As always I'm indebted to all the kind replies. Some time next week I'll stage this BGP configuration prior to implementing it in the field. Respectfully, Elmer Deloso (757)887-4603
RE:Drive, Determination... and financial resources!!!
I don't beleive that Cisco ever intended to make the CCIE cert easy to get in any respect. It takes extreme commitment and dedication to obtain this elite cert - both in terms of time and financial resources. IMHO it's as it should be. Prior to becoming a CCIE, being a top level engineer creates a demand for your services and therefore affords you the opportunities for substantial increases in pay. If you are merely average in your field, these opportunities are not as readily available. So if you are truly one of the best in your field, you should then have the resources to create your own lab and pursue the CCIE. It is another method of weeding out those that should not be wasting their time (or Cisco's) pursuing a cert they cannot obtain. While there are obviously exceptions to this (depending on financial status and ability) it is a limiting factor that should be left in place. I have met over 20 people who "claimed" to be pursuing their CCIE. Most of these did not have access to a decent lab and that was their excuse for not succeeding. I have offered to let these people use my lab, free of charge to help them in their pursuit. Only one of these people has ever logged on to my lab more than once, and none are currently CCIE's. This shows me that the lack of a lab was the excuse, the real reason for failing, was a lack of dedication. I have also met 4 people who were pursuing their CCIE's and built there own labs. All 4 are now CCIE's. As for my situation, I take the lab Oct. 30th. The CCIE cert is not for everyone. It was never intended to be a mass-market cert. It requires extreme dedication and committment to obtain - and part of that commitment is financial. Most CCIE's will tell you the best way to prepare for the CCIE Lab is to have your own home lab so that you can work on scenarios in a non-production environment ad infinitum. Constant contact with the product in every conceivable situation is the best way to prepare for the exam - and coincidentally the best way to prepare for the real world. By the time you pass the lab, you been there, done that and bought the T-shirt - and all will tell you it was a good investment. LAB **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated?
true - and I have generally had inactive VC's when I am going thru an NNI. When both ends are with the same phone co, they usually get it right, but when you go thru an NNI you tend to have more problems getting both companies to get to the same meeting switch & same DLCI at the same time. You end up with LMI's on both ends going to their local switches, but the PVC showing inactive on both ends. >>> "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/08 10:03 AM >>> VC status set to inactive indicates the connection between the local router and frame relay switch is working, but there is no connection between the remote router and the frame relay switch. A deleted VC occurs when the local router is unable to establish frame relay service with the frame relay switch. Inactive - local works, remote doesn't. Deleted - local doesn't - no opportunity to find out about the remote. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carter, Mark Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated? This question could probably best be answered by someone working for a service provider. (I currently work on the enterprise) When three or more lmi requests sent from the router to the central office switch are missed the c.o. switch will either delete or inactivate the pvc. Can someone explain to me the difference between a deleted pvc and an inactived one? What is happening on the telco side. Also, a url link to Cisco's documentation on this one would be helpful. (I tried a search but can't seem to pinpoint the area) **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing WS-X5010 cards from CAT5k
I need to remove some WS-X5010 24 port cards from a Cat5k slots 4 and 5. My question is what happens to the Vlans defined for the ports on those cards. Should I clear the vlan ports before I remove the cards? The same vlans have ports defined on other cards (slots 2&3) that I am not removing. Thanks, Scott **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*****Philadelphia , PA Lab Study Partner******
On My 3rd Attempt : CCIE candidate looking for ccnp,ccie equivalent lab partner . In the Tri-State Area .. Jim _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FTP Throughput slowing down
Actually, the one FTP server is within a "private" network. We have two companies that are connected via AT&T managed network. We're not doing any load control, nor is the other company, but I don't know what AT&T may be doing within the FR part... or their routers. |+> || DEREK.PATTERSON@KE| || LLY.AF.MIL| ||| || 09/08/00 01:33 PM | ||| |+> >| || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: FTP Throughput slowing down | >| what was the ftp site that you were attempting to go to.. if many were they in the same geographic location i.e. Seattle Washington.. do any of the paths correspond to the others. I'm coming of a .mil site and am experiencing the same problem > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FTP Throughput slowing down > > > > Can anyone explain why, when I do an FTP from one location over a Frame > Relay > link to another, it starts out with a good throughput, but after a few > minutes, > drops significantly, and the total bandwidth is not being exceeded. There > are a > few routers in-between that I have no control over. > > Thanks > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive, Determination... and financial resources!!!
What a great post! :-) No, I'm not sucking up. I have 2 2500 series routers, a 2600 router, a 3724 and 4003 switch at my disposal now. I know this is not quite enough to practice every scenario that is needed for the lab. The best thing is, I am learning what I don't know, and for now, that is good enough. I for one am not rushing the CCIE, although I study every week for at least 25 hours and have about 15 hours lab time. Louie, what is the requirement for one to log into your lab? Not begging, just asking. Good luck on your Oct 30th date!!! Jim Croyle -Original Message- From: Louie Belt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:Drive, Determination... and financial resources!!! I don't beleive that Cisco ever intended to make the CCIE cert easy to get in any respect. It takes extreme commitment and dedication to obtain this elite cert - both in terms of time and financial resources. IMHO it's as it should be. Prior to becoming a CCIE, being a top level engineer creates a demand for your services and therefore affords you the opportunities for substantial increases in pay. If you are merely average in your field, these opportunities are not as readily available. So if you are truly one of the best in your field, you should then have the resources to create your own lab and pursue the CCIE. It is another method of weeding out those that should not be wasting their time (or Cisco's) pursuing a cert they cannot obtain. While there are obviously exceptions to this (depending on financial status and ability) it is a limiting factor that should be left in place. I have met over 20 people who "claimed" to be pursuing their CCIE. Most of these did not have access to a decent lab and that was their excuse for not succeeding. I have offered to let these people use my lab, free of charge to help them in their pursuit. Only one of these people has ever logged on to my lab more than once, and none are currently CCIE's. This shows me that the lack of a lab was the excuse, the real reason for failing, was a lack of dedication. I have also met 4 people who were pursuing their CCIE's and built there own labs. All 4 are now CCIE's. As for my situation, I take the lab Oct. 30th. The CCIE cert is not for everyone. It was never intended to be a mass-market cert. It requires extreme dedication and committment to obtain - and part of that commitment is financial. Most CCIE's will tell you the best way to prepare for the CCIE Lab is to have your own home lab so that you can work on scenarios in a non-production environment ad infinitum. Constant contact with the product in every conceivable situation is the best way to prepare for the exam - and coincidentally the best way to prepare for the real world. By the time you pass the lab, you been there, done that and bought the T-shirt - and all will tell you it was a good investment. LAB **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ip helper address
I am trying to put a statement on the remote router to allow the clients to obtain an IP address accross the WAN. I have used the ip helper-address command successfully. My problem is that i would like any of the DHCP servers at the central site to be able to service DHCP requests from the remote site. Do I have to use mutilple ip helper-address statements ? I have tried a helper address pointing to the subnet, but that does not seem to work. EX. i have DHCP servers at 10.10.10.10 and 10.10.10.11 do i have to use two seperate ip helper address statements or can i use ip helper-address 10.10.10.0 ? **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination !!!!!!!!
Dale, I do have my CCNA and I also wrote the BCRAN exam and I am on the verge of writing my Switching exam. I also have my CCO account and did get the Sales Tool Central cd. I had also ordered the Cisco product catalog prior to becoming a reseller. I also want to reinforced the fact that I am in Edmonton, Alberta CANADA (hey!) and that for me to take a hands-on instructor led course (I then get lab access for 5 days) it cost $2600 or so of canadian buckaroo. (which converted in US $ is about10 cases of Coors Lite ). Seeing the real thing and doing virtual lab is two different thing. I like to get down and dirty and practice till I know what I am doing. This has always been my priority. I always was able to afford Lan Hardware and software. But Cisco stuff is another thing. I know that there is tons of people in this situatiuon. They want to move from network administrator to internetworking and the only means to learn are BOOKS! I do understand that I will be a paper CCNP (my goal for now) and I will not be afraid to confirm my ignorance as far as hands-on. But I will understand the concepts and have a good understanding of the different required configurations. I have been reading almost all of the related emails in this group for close to two months now. As you can see I am dedicating my time to learning as best as I can with the resources that I have. To be fair to Cisco's local office, I have to say that after the "cold shower" they gave me the first time around, I haven't called them since. I feel that I should know a little more in order to be able to pinpoint better my hands-on needs. I will call them again soon. Hope that they are a little more cooperative. ""Dale Holmes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Daniel - since you just started your own consulting firm, become a Cisco > reseller. Once you get a few entry level certs (CCNA, CCDA, Sales Expert), > you will find that Cisco will be very accomodating in terms of resources and > practice labs, etc. They offer a lot of stuff to their partners to help them > get certified. Right now they have a promotion where partners can take > certification classes at $500 instead of the usual $1200 - $1800... There is > even a special 2 for 1 deal (2 classes for $500). > > Cisco has a program called ASET (Advanced System Engineer Training) which > you can take in San Jose. It looks and feels just like the actual lab exam, > except that there is a CCIE there to help you, and you can talk amongst the > others there to find solutiuons to the problems you encounter... > > Become a Cisco partner - it is worth the effort... > > Dale > [=`) > > > >From: "Daniel Boutet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Daniel Boutet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination > >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:50:06 -0600 > > > >I totally agree with you Terrence. I do not have the opportunity to work > >with Cisco Products except AccessPro cards (2). > >I also just started my own consulting firm, so it is not easy to be able to > >buy the right equipment to paractice on. (NO $ available right now) > > > >I have other certs CNE (3,4,5), MCSE, A+ where I get to practice my skills > >everyday. > >I also have CCA but do not get to work on Citrix anymore. Not a lot of > >firms > >know about this product Citrix doesn't even have a demo version for labs. > >All they provide is a virtual demo room in FLA. > > > >There is also a time factor. I dedicate my time to working and trying to > >build a customer base. The time that I can spend in my lab is minimal. > >When you decide to study certification like Cisco it would be nice that > >Cisco would let us use their lab. After all we are supporting their > >products. > >Wouldn't it make sense for them to want certified people that at least saw > >their products (inside and out) and have minimal hands on? > > > >When I first started this certification I phone my local Cisco office and > >asked them if they had a lab I could use. I was turned away as if I was > >crazy. > >How is a person suppose to get real hands on in Edmonton Alberta? After I > >get more knowledge (books) I will try to give my time freely to get > >some > >experience. > > > >Just my two cents. > > > > > > > > > >""Terrence Garrison"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > lets face it. Any Certification that has no lab > > > can be obtained by an average person with ENOUGH > > > study. The CCIE can be passed if one has access to > > > the right equipment. There is NEVER a need to take > > > a class or have real experience. . .unless of course > > > you actually want to be good at your job. Having said > > > that, merely obtaining a cert like the CCNP or MCSE or > > > CCNA is of some value depending on the depth of the > > > job one needs to perform and the ability of an individual >
Re: On Demand Routing (ODR) - Anyone using this routing protocol?
Technically, its not a routing protocol, its an enhancement to CDP. Here:s a whiute paper on designing networks using ODR that might help you out. http://www.ieng.com/warp/public/105/39.html Karen E Young Network Engineer ELF Technologies, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Hornbeck, Timothy" -city.com>cc: Sent by: Subject: On Demand Routing (ODR) - Anyone using this routing [EMAIL PROTECTED] protocol? 09/08/2000 06:55 AM Please respond to "Hornbeck, Timothy" Wondering if anyone is using ODR instead of RIP, IGRP, OSPF, EIGRP? How does it scale? What's the overhead? Thanks, Timothy J. Hornbeck Technical Analyst III - Team Lead National City Bank - The quality of a network is not based on complexity, but on its simplicity and adherence to solid fundamentals. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide)
Was Joe Montona's number in there? :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:41 AM To: Dale Holmes; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worldwide) I was at Cisco for an interview and the paraded me through the CiscoTown Hall of Fame where the numbers are each framed, stuck on the way and lighted by one single light. -Original Message- From: Dale Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Retiring my number (was: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide) PS - in reply to Chris Hagen - the recert process involves only a written exam, you don't have to take the lab again... It's true about the discounts... there is much motivation on the part of Cisco partners to keep CCIE's current and on staff. What I wanna know is, when a CCIE retires, do they retire his number too (like with sports heroes)??? >From: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dick Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:29:48 -0700 > >I have heard that Cisco significantly discounts the proice of support >contracts to companies with current CCIEs. If this is true it is one >reason >why keeping the cert current increases marketability. >Nathan Miller > >-Original Message- >From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:21 PM >To: Chris Hagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > >/ >Another question is...Has an employer ever asked "is your CCIE current"? >\ >-Original Message- >From: Chris Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:12 PM >Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > > > >Well, if it costs $1,000 to take the lab again, which involves hours and > >hours of studying, and you go to a client and say, I'm CCIE and I >let > >my certifications lapse, but here's what I've been doing for the past X > >number of years > > > > Do you really need those 4 letters anymore with most companies with that > >level of experience? I mean, if it is out of date, it hasn't really been > >long enough to be REALLY out of date... > > > >*plink plink* > > > >-Chris > > > > > >"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p93pj$1ii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> Bollocks. > >> By definition a CCIE is the best when it comes to real world >experience. > >> > >> > >> "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > Might it also mean that people are finding that the > >> > certification is not as important in this market and > >> > that the 'lower' level certifications, along with > >> > 'real' world experience, provide a greater benefit to > >> > corporations and providers? > >> > > >> > > >> > --- "Healis, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > This could be due to people not passing > >> > > re-certification exams, failing to > >> > > schedule the re-cert exam in time, death, or even > >> > > worse Breaking Cisco's > >> > > NDA!! > >> > > > >> > > Jim Healis, CCDP, CCNP > >> > > Senior Network Administrator > >> > > Virata > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -Original Message- > >> > > From: Daniel Ji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:47 PM > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Subject: Re: Decreasing # of CCIE's Worlwide > >> > > > >> > > I guess that's good news for all of us who are > >> > > trying damn hard to be a > >> > > CCIE. After all, the less # worldwide, the more > >> > > value this cert will have. > >> > > it's all just simple "supply vs demand". > >> > > > >> > > Good luck to all! > >> > > > >> > > Daniel > >> > > Lab in Dec > >> > > > >> > > ""andy lennon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > > 8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p8ssl$rmi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> > > > First time i've seen the number of CCIE's go > >> > > down... > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > >> > > > > >> > > > Andy Lennon > >> > > > > >> > > > ccnp/dp/mcse > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ___ > >> > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com > >> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more > >> > > information go to > >> > > > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/As
RE: FTP Throughput slowing down
what was the ftp site that you were attempting to go to.. if many were they in the same geographic location i.e. Seattle Washington.. do any of the paths correspond to the others. I'm coming of a .mil site and am experiencing the same problem > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FTP Throughput slowing down > > > > Can anyone explain why, when I do an FTP from one location over a Frame > Relay > link to another, it starts out with a good throughput, but after a few > minutes, > drops significantly, and the total bandwidth is not being exceeded. There > are a > few routers in-between that I have no control over. > > Thanks > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM deaming/line encoding problem
Hans, I haven't had the chance to work with ATM but according to the Link 0 Framer info you're getting LOF on the receive (loss of frame delineation). Combine that with the number of uncorrectable errors on your receive and I'd say that the problem isn't necessarily your router. You might want to do a bit more checking on the BPX. Karen E Young Network Engineer ELF Technologies, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Hans Stout" cc: Sent by:Subject: ATM deaming/line encoding problem nobody@groupstud y.com 09/08/2000 05:10 PM Please respond to "Hans Stout" Hello colleagues, I have a problem with my ATM connection from my Cisco router to a Cisco BPX ATM switch. When I look at the line on the switch, the line status is ok. When I run the 'sh cont atm 1/0' command, I get the following output (maybe anybody as an idea on where the error could be); I know this is going to be a very long mail, but I can't help it: zrh-atm#sh contr atm1/0 Interface ATM1/0 is down Hardware is ATM E1 LANE client MAC address is 0002.4b76.0dd0 hwidb=0x81472004, ds=0x8148C564 slot 1, unit 0, subunit 0 rs8234 base 0x4080, slave base 0x4080 rs8234 ds 0x8148C564 SBDs - avail 2048, guaranteed 1, unguaranteed 2047, starved 0 Seg VCC table 4080B800, Shadow Seg VCC Table 814A8380, VCD Table 814BE3AC Schedule table 40816800, Shadow Schedule table 814C43D8, Size 7CD RSM VCC Table 4082BD00, Shadow RSM VCC Table 814C9414 VPI Index Table 40829280, VCI Index Table 4082B900 Bucket2 Table 40820480, Shadow Bucket2 Table 814C6338 MCR Limit Table 40820880, Shadow MCR Table 814C7F64 ABR template 40820A80, Shadow template 811FF798 RM Cell RS Queue 40829900 Queue TXQ Addr Pos StQ Addr Pos 0 UBR CHN0 40825A80 0028B4EA0 0 1 UBR CHN1 40825E80 0028B56A0 0 2 UBR CHN2 40826280 0028B5EA0 0 3 UBR CHN3 40826680 0028B66A0 0 4 VBR/ABR CHN0 40826A80 0028B6EA0 0 5 VBR/ABR CHN1 40826E80 0028B76A0 0 6 VBR/ABR CHN2 40827280 0028B7EA0 0 7 VBR/ABR CHN3 40827680 0028B86A0 0 8 VBR-RT CHN0 40827A80 0028B8EA0 0 9 VBR-RT CHN1 40827E80 0028B96A0 0 10 VBR-RT CHN2 40828280 0028B9EA0 0 11 VBR-RT CHN3 40828680 0028BA6A0 0 12 SIG 40828A80 0028BAEA0 0 13 VPD 40828E80 0028BB6A0 0 Queue FBQ Addr Pos RSQ Addr Pos 0 OAM 408EBD00 132 028BBF60 133 1 UBR CHN0 408ECD00 0028BCF60 0 2 UBR CHN1 408EDD00 0028BDF60 0 3 UBR CHN2 408EED00 0028BEF60 0 4 UBR CHN3 408EFD00 0028BFF60 0 5 VBR/ABR CHN0 408F0D00 8028C0F60 9 6 VBR/ABR CHN1 408F1D00 0028C1F60 0 7 VBR/ABR CHN2 408F2D00 0028C2F60 0 8 VBR/ABR CHN3 408F3D00 0028C3F60 0 9 VBR-RT CHN0 408F4D00 0028C4F60 0 10 VBR-RT CHN1 408F5D00 0028C5F60 0 11 VBR-RT CHN2 408F6D00 0028C6F60 0 12 VBR-RT CHN3 408F7D00 0028C7F60 0 13 SIG 408F8D00 0028C8F60 0 SAR Scheduling channels: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 ATM channel number is 0 Link 0 IMA Info: group index is 99 Tx link id is 0, Tx link state is notInGroup Rx link id is 99, Rx link state is notInGroup Rx link failure status is noFailure, 0 tx failures, 1 rx failures Link 0 Framer Info: framing is Multiframe-CRC4, line code is HDB3, impedance is 120 ohm clock src is line, payload-scrambling is enabled, no loopback line status is 0x420; or Rx LOF, Tx LOMF. port is active, link is unavailable 36213058 idle rx, 1917 correctable hec rx, 309882 uncorrectable hec rx
RE: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated?
Title: RE: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated? Thanks for your help. I guess part of the confusion was: the difference between the LMI connection state and the pvc status - I guess the two are the same? -Original Message- From: Roger Dellaca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated? true - and I have generally had inactive VC's when I am going thru an NNI. When both ends are with the same phone co, they usually get it right, but when you go thru an NNI you tend to have more problems getting both companies to get to the same meeting switch & same DLCI at the same time. You end up with LMI's on both ends going to their local switches, but the PVC showing inactive on both ends. >>> "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/08 10:03 AM >>> VC status set to inactive indicates the connection between the local router and frame relay switch is working, but there is no connection between the remote router and the frame relay switch. A deleted VC occurs when the local router is unable to establish frame relay service with the frame relay switch. Inactive - local works, remote doesn't. Deleted - local doesn't - no opportunity to find out about the remote. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carter, Mark Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: LMI's missed - PVC deleted or inactivated? This question could probably best be answered by someone working for a service provider. (I currently work on the enterprise) When three or more lmi requests sent from the router to the central office switch are missed the c.o. switch will either delete or inactivate the pvc. Can someone explain to me the difference between a deleted pvc and an inactived one? What is happening on the telco side. Also, a url link to Cisco's documentation on this one would be helpful. (I tried a search but can't seem to pinpoint the area) **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
public router access?
A buddy of mine asks: > Do you remember the place that let you console into three of four > different 2501's for an hour, and then reset the lab so that someone > else could? Was it somewhere at ciscostudy.com? I can't seem to be > able to find it right now... -- Ron Mansolino [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netaxs.com/~rmsolino/ Earthstation / Net Access - "The NOC that Rocks Around the Clock" Philadelphia's Original Internet Provider - Now in our ninth year! www.netaxs.com www.newsread.com www.netcondo.com earthstation.net **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drive, Motivation and Determination !!!!!!!!
It's too bad that you don't live in the northeast, Our local Cisco office has lots of hands on events for resellers that don't cost anything. The handouts and presentations are stored on the web site in ZIP format in the "Presentation/Document Archive" at http://www.cisco-resellers.com/ The schedules for the Reseller Hands On events are also there. I went to a lot of them from a reseller that only sold one router and one PIX in a six month period while I worked there. Vern Stitt ASE, CCA, CCNA, MCSE ""Daniel Boutet"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8par87$t5k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8par87$t5k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I totally agree with you Terrence. I do not have the opportunity to work with Cisco Products except AccessPro cards (2). I also just started my own consulting firm, so it is not easy to be able to buy the right equipment to paractice on. (NO $ available right now) I have other certs CNE (3,4,5), MCSE, A+ where I get to practice my skills everyday. I also have CCA but do not get to work on Citrix anymore. Not a lot of firms know about this product Citrix doesn't even have a demo version for labs. All they provide is a virtual demo room in FLA. There is also a time factor. I dedicate my time to working and trying to build a customer base. The time that I can spend in my lab is minimal. When you decide to study certification like Cisco it would be nice that Cisco would let us use their lab. After all we are supporting their products. Wouldn't it make sense for them to want certified people that at least saw their products (inside and out) and have minimal hands on? When I first started this certification I phone my local Cisco office and asked them if they had a lab I could use. I was turned away as if I was crazy. How is a person suppose to get real hands on in Edmonton Alberta? After I get more knowledge (books) I will try to give my time freely to get some experience. Just my two cents. ""Terrence Garrison"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > lets face it. Any Certification that has no lab > can be obtained by an average person with ENOUGH > study. The CCIE can be passed if one has access to > the right equipment. There is NEVER a need to take > a class or have real experience. . .unless of course > you actually want to be good at your job. Having said > that, merely obtaining a cert like the CCNP or MCSE or > CCNA is of some value depending on the depth of the > job one needs to perform and the ability of an individual > to translate theory into practice. Some people can do > this better than others, but it depends on the individual > and have much drive, motivation and determination one > has. In the end, it is drive, motivation and determination > that makes anyone good at whatever it is they do. . .Cert > or not, degree or not, smart or average. > > > >From: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Rishard Chapoteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Anyone achieve their CCIE through self study not from work! > >Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:02:35 -0400 > > > >So your telling us you got your CCNP with no experience at all? I > >seriously > >hope not. > > > >Rishard > > > > > >""Wind"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p444d$q14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hiya; > > > > > > Now I finished my CCNP. I should go for the CCIE, > >otherwise > >my > > > ccnp status is just a paperwork. > > > I just wondering does CCIE can be earned through self study, not from > > > working with system integrator? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >___ > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.ht
Re: Bandwidth Estimation for WAN Link
www.2wire.com, for internet bandwidth and a tool called qcheck from NETIQ for point to point bandwidth checks I would start with those lee wrote: > Hi all, has anyone did the bandwidth estimation for WAN link before ? > i have a customer who has about 150+ users in the data center, due to the > renovation reason, all this users need to be move to another new place for 6 > months. And this customer already decided to use leased line between the new > place & existing data center ( some of the servers in existing data > center ). > My customer want me to do the bandwidth estimation for them, especially the > coming leased line, they planned to get a 2Mbps link, is it sufficient ??? > how can i prove them that the 2Mbps link is sufficient or not ??? > > FYI, all this 150+ users need to access the SAP server, Lotus Notes server > via the coming leased line, is there anyway to capture the user request > traffice & come out a statistic or something ??? Any tools that can be use > for this circumstance ??? > > Thanks in advance. > > rgs, > lee > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] begin:vcard n:Whelan;John tel;pager:919.507.2327 tel;work:919.981.2666 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:ITS-MAPS;ITS adr:;;;Raleigh;NC;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Engineer fn:ITS end:vcard
Passed BCRAN
I passed BCRAN today with an 846 (706 to pass). It wasn't nearly as difficult as I was expecting. I used the Cisco Press BCRAN book by Catherin Paquet. I read the book once, skimmed it a second time, then reviewed a few chapters. I wrote out lots and lots of config fragments for practice. That's it. Jeff **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI dialout help
Hello, I have asked my provider and they confirmed they are using pap. Now I tried again while debugging "ppp auth" and "ppp neg". I can see a AUTH-NAK in the debug but am not sure what does this exactly mean? Can some one please advise whats going on here and how to fix it? 1d17h: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 64 changed to up 1d17h: ISDN BR0: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x4A 1d17h: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 1d17h: Channel ID i = 0x83 1d17h: Called Party Number i = 0x80, '1214' 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- SETUP_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: Channel ID i = 0x89 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: Channel ID i = 0x89 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: Dat.e/Time i = 0x0009080B1A00 1d17h: ISDN BR0: TX -> CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x4A 1d17h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 198 len 10 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xE9AF7753 (0x0506E9AF7753) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 26 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xDC5B675B (0x0506DC5B675B) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MRRU 1500 (0x110405DC) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MultilinkShortSeq (0x1202) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x13060150444E) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 16 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MRRU 1500 (0x110405DC) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MultilinkShortSeq (0x1202) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x13060150444E) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 14 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:AuthPro.to PAP (0x0304C023) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xDC5B675B (0x0506DC5B675B) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 2 len 14 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xDC5B675B (0x0506DC5B675B) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKsent 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 199 len 10 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xE9AF7753 (0x0506E9AF7753) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 199 len 10 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0xE9AF7753 (0x0506E9AF775.3) 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: State is Open 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by the peer 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: O AUTH-REQ id 145 len 24 from "delta" 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: I AUTH-NAK id 145 len 5. 1d17h: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 1214 . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Router# 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: O AUTH-REQ id 146 len 24 from "delta" 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: I AUTH-NAK id 146 len 5 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: O AUTH-REQ id 147 len 24 from "delta" 1d17h: BR0:1 PAP: I AUTH-NAK id 147 len 5 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 3 len 4 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing 1d17h: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from 1214 , call l asted 22 seconds 1d17h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down 1d17h: BR0:1 LCP: State is Closed 1d17h: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is DOWN 1d17h: ISDN BR0: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x4A 1d17h: Cause i = 0x809008 - Normal call clearing 1d17h: ISDN BR0: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0xCA 1d17h: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 64 changed to down -- Original Message -- From: "Miller, Nathan (AZ15)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:39:30 -0700 >I had similar problems. I would check with your provider regarding >authentication. It may be that they are requiring chap authentication? >Issue "debug ppp auth" and "debug ppp neg" (assuming your IOS is relatively >current) and look at the results when you try to connect. This may give you >some insight into where things are failing. > >Good Luck! > >-Original Message- >From: Zafar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:46 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: ISDN BRI dialout help > > > >Hello, > >I am trying to configure ISDN BRI for dialout using 2503 but could not >connect to remote access server of the ISP. I have taken a ISDN dialup >account from ISP and it has given me "userid", passwd and dialup number. I >tried these through normal dialup (windows dun) and it connects succesfully. >Now I have following configuration for my 2503 router but this could not >connect. Please advise if I am missing something as I am new to ISDN and >doing it for the first time > > >! >interface BRI0 > ip address negotiated > ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no ip split-horizon > dialer idle-timeout 2147483 > dialer string 1214 > dialer hold-queue 10 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type
RE: Higher than CCIE...
Sesame Street Certs? From Nortel, Cisco, Microsoft, Novell, and CompTIA??? I think not... BUT: Hmmm... My kids could go for some Sesame Street certs: SSCEF Sesame Street Certified Elmo Fanatic SSCCMA Sesame Street Certified Cookie Monster Afficionado SSCSGE Sesame Street Certified Super Grover Emulator SSCKTFAS "" Certified Kermit the Frog Alphabet Sayer My twin girls could nail all of these certs no problem... I hear that they are working on a certification with Bert and Ernie which would involve a lab where you have to put down a duckie and play a saxaphone, then dance "the pidgeon"! Now *THAT'S* a lab!!! Dale [=`) >From: "jaime salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "jaime salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Higher than CCIE... >Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 11:16:54 CDT > >What are these sesame street Certs. Get real Certifications my >friend. > > > >>From: "Check your mail!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Check your mail!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: Higher than CCIE... >>Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 05:21:58 -0500 >> >>IF you only KNEW!! >>Rob Mears III, NNCSS, NNCDS, CCNA, MCSE+I, CNE4&5, A+ >>Technical Mercenary >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: John Hobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 12:37 AM >> > To:Check your mail!; Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: RE: Higher than CCIE... >> > >> > Get a life! Get your CCIE and then buy a dog and enjoy life - you >>sound >> > like a cert freak who is never satisified until you have every cert in >>the >> > industry. >> > >> > Or go to work for Cisco - or just go to work period and use what certs >>you >> > do have. >> > >> > jh >> > >> > -Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:46 AM >> >To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject:RE: Higher than CCIE... >> > >> >Do you think Cisco is the only certification out their? Come on all, >> > look at the big picture and stop worshiping these CCIE types. >> > >> >Rob >> > >> > -Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > >> >Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 10:56 AM >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject:RE: Higher than CCIE... >> > >> > >> >The title should be more like Elevated Cisco Internetworking >> > Deity, ( El CID ) >> > >> > >> >One Certification to rule them all >> >One Certification to find them >> >One Certification to bring them all >> >And in the Networks bind them >> >In the Land Of Cisco, where the Routers lie >> > >> > >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:56 PM >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject:Higher than CCIE... >> > >> >Hey Group, >> >I was pondering this thought. If the rate of >> > CCIE's is rising at a fast pace than I think it would be cool if Cisco >> > created a new cert. The way to obtain this one would be to pass all >>three >> > CCIE tests. From what I know there is only one person in the world who >>has >> > all three... I think his name is Brendan Ta or something. They could >>name >> > the cert: CCID (Cisco certified internetwork director), or something >>like >> > (and this is my favorite): CCIG (Cisco certified internetwork guru) :) >> > Don't think they would use that one though, :) This type of cert >>would, >> > in my eyes, deem you as a true master of the matrix, if you know what I >> > mean...just a though. Maybe we can get some good responses on this >> > one...Have a good one group. >> > >> >P.S. I would like if Priscilla O. and Todd L. could >> > also comment on this topic...thanks. :) >> > >> >Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA >> >E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >~Internetwork Essentials~ >> >"Complete Solutions for Complex Networks" >> > >><< winmail.dat >> > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-A
Re: cisco load director
Your physical setup is the problem. You have three options to make this work. 1) Plug the servers directly into local director, using crossover cables. 2) Buy a new switch and plug it into the local director, and the servers into it. 3) Create a new VLAN on the switch for the servers and LD, but you need a L3 device to handle the VLAN routing. Your packets/frames are getting mixed up because return traffic isn't coming back through the local director. According to your config (no ping-allow x), your shouldn't be able to ping your real servers. Hope this works out for you. Jeff ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8pb61i$qbm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pb61i$qbm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi, > > i can ping the servers from the PIX , but not the virtual IP ... the servers > are not directly plugged in the LD .. there is a common switch for the LD > interface,the PIX internal interface and the servers as they all are in the > sane network. one thing i want is that should i plug in one more interface > of the LD in the same network as right now i have only one interface into > this network. > > regds > Pushkar > > "Jeffrey Eiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:8pb024$fo2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I didn't notice anything obviously wrong with your config. This may sound > > obvious, but the LD uses a regular old NIC. If your servers are plugged > > directly into the LD, you must use a crossover cable. For troubleshooting > > only, allow any port to pass through the local director. Then lock it > down > > to 80/443 after everything is working. Try ping your servers from the LD, > > and try to ping the LD from the PIX DMZ interface. Do a 'show real' and > > 'show virtual' to get some better info than the config. > > > > Let me know how you do from here. > > > > Jeff > > > > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97ca$mco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > hi friends, > > > i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a > > very > > > simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet > > and > > > one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside > on > > > the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i want to load > > > balance ... > > > > > > i have natted the virtual IP in the firewall to a public IP .. and > opened > > > port 80 for incoming hits now this virtual IP is bound to the 2 web > > > servers ... > > > > > > but the prob is that i donot get any inbound connections from outside .. > > > also when i tried to telnet to port 80 of the virtual IP from inside > also > > .. > > > i'm unable to do so ... > > > > > > also i have connected only one ethernet cable from the first ethernet > > > interface on the LAN .. do i have to connect another cable from the > second > > > interface even though they are in the same n/w ?? > > > > > > please can anyone help out ... this is ans SOS situation .. > > > the config file is below .. please take a look ... > > > > > > Pushkar > > > --- > > > : Saved > > > : LocalDirector 416 Version 3.1.4 > > > syslog output 20.3 > > > no syslog console > > > enable password 4d9b64f9ab66474af34252545443b8 encrypted > > > hostname web_ld > > > no shutdown ethernet 0 > > > no shutdown ethernet 1 > > > shutdown ethernet 2 > > > interface ethernet 0 auto > > > interface ethernet 1 auto > > > interface ethernet 2 auto > > > mtu 0 1500 > > > mtu 1 1500 > > > mtu 2 1500 > > > multiring all > > > no secure 0 > > > no secure 1 > > > no secure 2 > > > no ping-allow 0 > > > no ping-allow 1 > > > no ping-allow 2 > > > ip address 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0 > > > no rip passive > > > rip version 1 > > > failover ip address 0.0.0.0 > > > no failover > > > password cisco > > > snmp-server enable traps > > > no snmp-server contact > > > no snmp-server location > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp is > > > virtual 172.16.0.253:443:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp is > > > real 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp is > > > name 172.16.0.4 web1 > > > name 172.16.0.10 web2 > > > name 172.16.0.253 domain > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.4:80:0:tcp > > > bind 172.16.0.253:80:0:tcp 172.16.0.10:80:0:tcp > > > : end > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > > _ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guid