cpu utilization of catalyst switches [7:21544]
Hi. What is the acceptable cpu utilaziton value of catalyst 4000 series switches? I have a 4006 and cpu utilazition is about %30 is it ok? is this value acceptable? thanks regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21544t=21544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIp over 64K leased line [7:21532]
Yes over the internet, but not over 64k lines in production. The principle's the same but you've just got less capacity and you'll be more reliant on qos and queuing. What exactly do you want to know? regards Pat MJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone , Has anyone here has implmented VoIp over 64K digital leased lines over the internet ? Would you like to share your experience here .. ? Mukul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21545t=21532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TCP H.225 [7:21519]
Matthew here's a little info on the ports used in h323: To set up a voice connection, the initiator starts a H.225 connection over TCP to the destination entity (normally the gatekeeper) at port number 1720. In this session a port number for the following H.245 connection is exchanged. The initiator opens in the next step a H.245 connection to the gatekeeper over TCP (ephemeral port), in which ports for the actual voice traffic between two H.323 terminals are exchanged. While the H.225 connection could be torn down after the H.245 ports have been exchanged, it will in practice stay up until the call is over. The gatekeeper itself will also open connections to the terminating H.323 terminal in order to be able to negotiate the ports that should be used between the initiating and the terminating H.323 terminal. Other TCP ports used for RAS services are 1718 (H.323 gatekeeper discovery) and 1719 (H.323 gatekeeper registration and status). regards Pat Matthew Webster wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I am a recent CCNA graduate, and am about to tackle the challenges of the CCNP Routing 2.0 exam. Look forward to asking/providing help where possible! Anyway, I have a question - does anyone know the ITU spec, or RFC that deals with TCP ports for H.225 RAS messages. I know that port 1719 is used for ARQ's and ARC's, but am not sure what port 1720 is used for...here is part of the Etherpeek trace: TCP - Transport Control Protocol Source Port: 64642 Destination Port: 1720 RAS Transport Layer Service Access Point can anyone help? cheers, Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21546t=21519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spanning tree fwddelay ques [7:21547]
does anyone describe, somebody ask me, which statement is not true about spanning tree forward delay value that u can check with the catalyst 5000 show command ?? says: 1, all the default values are obtained from the root bridge ?? says: 2 all switch ports must use the values learned from the root bridge ?? says: 3 the delay calue can be set on the root bridge as fwddelay argument ?? says: 4 the delay is how much time the port should spend in listending or learning mode Best Regards Have A Good Day!! ;;; Farhan AhmedR MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE , CCA Network Engineer Mideast Data Systems Abu Dhabi Uae. ;;; Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor Endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21547t=21547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIp over 64K leased line [7:21532]
Just wanted to ask you what hardware you have implemented ? What is the bandwidth ? How many channels ? Any please tell us about your experience to us since I am also looking to implement the same. Mukul Patrick Donlon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yes over the internet, but not over 64k lines in production. The principle's the same but you've just got less capacity and you'll be more reliant on qos and queuing. What exactly do you want to know? regards Pat MJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone , Has anyone here has implmented VoIp over 64K digital leased lines over the internet ? Would you like to share your experience here .. ? Mukul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21548t=21532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21549]
Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21549t=21549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIp over 64K leased line [7:21532]
Hardware, we used AS5300 as PSTN gateways located in various countries to terminate off-net traffic, they had up to 4 x E1s and were connected to, or close to, the backbone which had v.high throughput. For the on-net traffic 1750, 2600, 3600 as5300s were used. The local tail connections to the internet were fairly high capacity again, no less than 2MB, we tested much lower speeds in the lab though. QOS is very difficult across the internet so only the local tail was worked on, had to rely on bandwidth after that. The best qos results in testing were with cbwfq/llq BUT in most places the routers the CPE connects to don't support these features and you only have the tos bit to place with. Codecs used were g711 (80k or 65k per call) as standard and g729 (24k or 12k per call), if asked for. We never had any major problems with quality of calls, most people couldn't tell the difference with g711. Generally if there were problems it occurred in the call set up. For call set up we used a 3rd party gatekeeper solution, don't bother, it was a very good idea, i.e.. not being tied to one supplier and using open standards as much as you can with voip, but it didn't always work. Cisco's gatekeeper was a joke about a year ago, it may be better now, but you can do it all manually if you haven't got to many sites as a last resort. Hope this answers some questions Regards MJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Just wanted to ask you what hardware you have implemented ? What is the bandwidth ? How many channels ? Any please tell us about your experience to us since I am also looking to implement the same. Mukul Patrick Donlon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yes over the internet, but not over 64k lines in production. The principle's the same but you've just got less capacity and you'll be more reliant on qos and queuing. What exactly do you want to know? regards Pat MJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone , Has anyone here has implmented VoIp over 64K digital leased lines over the internet ? Would you like to share your experience here .. ? Mukul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21550t=21532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN over two switched T1 channels? [7:21551]
I've got an ISDN PRI back at the home office and 6 routers that dial into for backups via their ISDN BRI connections. I have been told by my service provider that I can use two switched 56K channels off of an existing T1 at another site to dial into the ISDN PRI. I have been looking to try and find some kind of sample configuration to do this. I'm not even sure how this would work. Could anyone steer me in the right direction? I have searched through Cisco's web site, without much success and TAC is still researching it for me, but I'm not sure they are confident it can be done. The remote site router has a 2600 series router with a WIC DSU T1 card. The home office has a 3600 with an ISDN PRI card. Thanks! Rob Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21551t=21551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to purge MLS cache [7:21540]
clear mls ip Regards, Dom Thomas N. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, I would like to purge the entries in the MLS cache of the 6509, then let the switch relearn the MAC. What commend should I use? Thanks All! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21553t=21540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP problem [7:21510]
In a message dated 9/30/01 6:34:30 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 09/30/2001 12:49:50 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Date: 09/30/2001 12:49:50 PM Central Daylight Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Bond) Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Bond) To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, We have about 20 core routers running EIGRP. For some reason, EIGRP recaculated ALL routes every 10-15 hours. This seems odd because I think EIGRP will only caculate effected routes, right? I turned on debug ip eigrp notification on some routers but didn't find anything wrong. How do I find the problem? Thanks in advance. Jim Jim, Try: show ip eigrp database all to see if you have Stuck-In-Active routes. HTH, Rob H.NP, DP, blah,blah,blah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21552t=21510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Proxy ARP scenerio for LAB?? [7:21554]
I know that this is probably not what you are looking for, but in [Doyle, page121] there is a case stydy A Protocol Conflict showing a problems with interaction between proxy ARP and bridging. Przemek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Lover Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Proxy ARP scenerio for LAB?? Hi guys, Any one can recommend any practical scenerio/Example Involving Proxy-ARP by specially considering RS LAb. I heard this word many times but not sure how to use it practically and where. Thanks for the Help guys. Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21554t=21554 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cpu utilization of catalyst switches [7:21544]
30% seems about right. For the true CPU info check out the following links: For the Catalyst 4000 series: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/82.html For the Catalyst 2900XL/3500XL series: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/19.html -Original Message- From: Burgin Kozak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cpu utilization of catalyst switches [7:21544] Hi. What is the acceptable cpu utilaziton value of catalyst 4000 series switches? I have a 4006 and cpu utilazition is about %30 is it ok? is this value acceptable? thanks regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21555t=21544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Key To Pass the Exam [7:21556]
Dear Friends, This is time to find out a website with remarable 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. So visit http://www.smartcert.net for 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. They have also developed Study Guides for MCSE, CCNA, CCNP, SUN SOLARIS, SUN JAVA, OCP and CIW. Regards, Gemini _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21556t=21556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21557]
I'll be brief. Check out the Archives. Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html -- Thanks, Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. - Norton Juster Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21557t=21557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21558]
Integrated ISIS does not use CLNS outside of sharing some packet structures. It remains a valid exam topic. Peter *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 8:12 AM Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21558t=21558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FDDI Modules-What to use [7:21559]
I am trying to replace 2 lanplex 6000's with Cisco equipment. I need to replace the FDDI modules but am having little luck. I dont want to buy a Cat5000. I have thought of buying multiple 2820's but they seem to be end of series. Any ideas on what I could use? I need 11 ports in all and currently have 4 from 2 2820's. Any ideas much appreciated. stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21559t=21559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheap Memory [7:21560]
Folks, There was a link and details of someone who has cheap memory for routers to sell posted in the last 2/3 weeks, please if you have that mail kindly forward it to me. Regards Michael Ibidunni Systems Engineer Business Data Services City M25 Team NTL: Tel:0207 562 5800 Mobile: 07866 625922 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21560t=21560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Proxy ARP scenerio for LAB?? [7:21561]
One example which could prove useful is configure a pc with the default gateway as its self. It will now ARP for local and remote addresses. Now configure routers on the network with proxy arp on and off. Thanks, Mark Beck CCIE: 6906 -Original Message- From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 04:44 To: Cisco Lover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Proxy ARP scenerio for LAB?? I know that this is probably not what you are looking for, but in [Doyle, page121] there is a case stydy A Protocol Conflict showing a problems with interaction between proxy ARP and bridging. Przemek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Lover Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Proxy ARP scenerio for LAB?? Hi guys, Any one can recommend any practical scenerio/Example Involving Proxy-ARP by specially considering RS LAb. I heard this word many times but not sure how to use it practically and where. Thanks for the Help guys. Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21561t=21561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
350-001 what about secrity questions [7:21562]
Hi all, I just study for this exam. The last time I failed because I had some questions about security like TACAC's and RADIUS. Now I want to learn more about this to pass this questions. Can anyone help with additional informations about the required know how for security like this Thanks Udo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21562t=21562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21564]
A classmate failed last week because he was unable to configure ISIS between BGP and OSPF. Eyad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Van Oene Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:59 AM To: Cisco Lover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? Integrated ISIS does not use CLNS outside of sharing some packet structures. It remains a valid exam topic. Peter *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 8:12 AM Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21564t=21564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN over two switched T1 channels? [7:21551]
That's an interesting question and I don't have a definitive answer but off the cuff I would think that yes you should be able to do this. One of the reasons for switched services was in the not-to-distant past there were lots of analog CO's that could not offer digital, i.e. ISDN services but these anolog CO's were/are not an island unto themselves. Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got an ISDN PRI back at the home office and 6 routers that dial into for backups via their ISDN BRI connections. I have been told by my service provider that I can use two switched 56K channels off of an existing T1 at another site to dial into the ISDN PRI. I have been looking to try and find some kind of sample configuration to do this. I'm not even sure how this would work. Could anyone steer me in the right direction? I have searched through Cisco's web site, without much success and TAC is still researching it for me, but I'm not sure they are confident it can be done. The remote site router has a 2600 series router with a WIC DSU T1 card. The home office has a 3600 with an ISDN PRI card. Thanks! Rob Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21565t=21551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21557]
As far as I know Cisco IOS supports CLNS only as much as in needed to supoort IS-IS. Dave Jason Gardiner wrote: I'll be brief. Check out the Archives. Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html -- Thanks, Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. - Norton Juster -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21567t=21557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless NICs [7:21568]
I'm testing out a Cisco Aironet 340 access point, it's working fine with Win2k and a handheld Ipaq. However when I try to set-up an NT machine I don't get an IP address from the dhcp server. The client tells me it's associated, the only difference I can see on the status between the Win2K and NT is that the NT machine has ETSI as the channel set whereas win2k has North America. I've tried different NICs and NT drivers, also occasionally I see a message saying that WEP is not purchased or enabled in the Network security tab on the ACU properties, help!! regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21568t=21568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AGS+ IOS 11 bridging [7:21515]
Boy, haven't worked on an AGS in 6 years!!! If CRB is simply a software issue than it probably would work but my guess is that there may well be hardware limitions on the AGS, like the inability to do ISL encapsulation on a CAT4000. Dave Dan Faulk wrote: Anyone out there done much with bridging serial ports on the AGS? The Cisco documentation says different things on the subject one source says concurrent bridging wont work on this box others make little distinction. I wish to bridge on the 8 serial ports and route on the 12 Ethernet ports. Encap on the serials is not important although I will be passing IP. Cant just try and see on this one as it will determine which cables I purchase for my lab and money is tight. TIA Dan -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21566t=21515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX - VERY URGENT [7:21569]
Please Help - Have configure a PIX Firewall with basic NAT. Cant get can connection through the firewall. Have set up the PING command - access-list acl_out permit icmp any any access-group acl_out in interface outside access-group acl_out in interface inside cant ping through even, keep getting this message 302010: 0 in use, 36 most used Can some one help please. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21569t=21569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blocking Morpheus [7:21302]
This is not a real option. The point is to block it at the firewall. In a company with a lot of users, its difficult to tell everyone to do this. The whole point is to take away the control of the users. White, Shanice wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... in morpheus, if you go to tools, options and traffic, you can turn off your file sharing. -Original Message- From: Carroll Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Blocking Morpheus [7:21302] At 11:48 AM 9/27/01 -0400, sam sneed wrote: Hello, I wanted to know if anyone knew how to block the Morpheus music sharing program at the firewall. I have a checkpoint firewall which has the following rules Internal net --- Any allow all Any --- Internet drop all I installed and ran Morpheus (a new kind of Napster from http://www.musiccity.com/ ) Within an hour other users were downloading MP3's off my workstaion which should have been firewalled. I know that the program starts a TCP server on port 1214. This should be blocked by the firewall. Anyone know how this works and how it could be blocked, monitored, or controlled? sam sneed A few possibilities. I never used Morpheus, but I can only guess at what the software did. You initiated an open connection to Mr. Morpheus. The firewall opens up the connection for you to go out, and has a state table to make sure your ACK packets can now come back in. Mr. Morpheus has a full TCP connection and can send whatever information it likes. Since you do not have the source code for the client, you do not know what the client is doing. So let us assume the worst. As long as Mr. Morpheus can tell your server, in band through the TCP connection channel wise, to open another outgoing, and startup the service, it is going to fool your firewall. If your client/host machine srcs from 1214 and goes to morpheus again, the firewall will open the connection, and dynamically create a rule for return packets to 1214. That is my best guess short of misconfiguration on your part. A variant of this is proxy features in a firewall where they dynamically open up after seeing some data in the input stream. So, say you get some HTML code with some nasty Irc DCC request that opens below 1024 or some other higher port (some things run on higher ports and are still fairly useful) and your firewall has an irc proxy, it will open up a port through your firewall and voila. You now have a direct line to the outside. Of course, any proxy method with some kind of embedding can do this. Scary, eh? The silent trojan thanks to HTML based email software and random bad web sites. Solution would be to use a web proxy that disables ridiculous attempts in the HTML code stream. As to how to solve this? Do not use morpheus. Or, make a restrictive outgoing policy. Internal net-Any allow all although is easy to write, means if someone can trick your internal net, ala trojans, or weirdo clients to open a port out. If it is cleverly written, they can subvert your firewall since it has no idea he is being fooled when he sets up the dynamic rules ala state tables. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21570t=21302 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21571]
This topic has been discussed to death! It's got everything you've ever wanted to know about retransmission events. Just make sure you put in your search terms properly--so read the instructions first. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raul De La Garza III Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21563] One of the problem areas I have while studying for the CCIE Written is in regard to transmission rebroadcasts over a serial link using various protocols i.e. HDLC, X.25, Frame Relay, etc. Can anyone please assist me in researching this topic? Thank you, Raul De La Garza III CCDP NNCSS MCSE CNE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21571t=21571 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21557]
Cisco fully supports ISO CLNS however, ISO CLNS has been removed from the protocols tested on the CCIE Lab. Integrated ISIS is not dependant on CLNS and thus remains a valid exam topic. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 11:03 AM MADMAN wrote: As far as I know Cisco IOS supports CLNS only as much as in needed to supoort IS-IS. Dave Jason Gardiner wrote: I'll be brief. Check out the Archives. Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html -- Thanks, Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. - Norton Juster -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21572t=21557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21573]
Try HDLC;retransmission as your search terms. Also set the max files returned to 100. Messages with subject lines like Re: retransmission of packets, Re: HDLC, CCIE Written Exam, Re: Packet retransmission, and RE: retransmission of packets in WAN are just a few examples of the several occasions in which this topic has been discussed. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Raul De La Garza III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21563] Leigh, Thanks. However, I must be a poor searcher for I cannot seem to bring up anything close to what I am looking for. Perhaps you can send a link to one of the discussions. That would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advance. Raul - Original Message - From: Leigh Anne Chisholm To: Raul De La Garza III ; Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21563] http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/cisco (Groupstudy's archives). This topic has been discussed to death! It's got everything you've ever wanted to know about retransmission events. Just make sure you put in your search terms properly--so read the instructions first. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raul De La Garza III Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Where can one find some assistance regarding transmission [7:21563] One of the problem areas I have while studying for the CCIE Written is in regard to transmission rebroadcasts over a serial link using various protocols i.e. HDLC, X.25, Frame Relay, etc. Can anyone please assist me in researching this topic? Thank you, Raul De La Garza III CCDP NNCSS MCSE CNE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21573t=21573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX - VERY URGENT [7:21569]
The info you've provided is not enough to give a wild guess. Suggest you post the entire configuration (remove passwords) and give a description of the network connections. C.E.O Dickson wrote: Please Help - Have configure a PIX Firewall with basic NAT. Cant get can connection through the firewall. Have set up the PING command - access-list acl_out permit icmp any any access-group acl_out in interface outside access-group acl_out in interface inside cant ping through even, keep getting this message 302010: 0 in use, 36 most used Can some one help please. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21574t=21569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondary address on router [7:21576]
Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21576t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Layering theory (was Re: which layer BGP,RIP , [7:21378]
What I am clearly saying is that when US politicians go to their doctors and
demand antibiotics, that they must be willing to change the slide!
:-{)]
p.s. get a grip.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21575t=21378
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX - VERY URGENT [7:21569]
Can the firewall ping your router? Can the firewall ping the inside 'host'? Did you create the NAT addresses / pool? Do a show xlate ... what xlates are listed? Do you have an external route on your FW and is the def gateway of your host(s) set correctly? Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: C.E.O Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:PIX - VERY URGENT [7:21569] Please Help - Have configure a PIX Firewall with basic NAT. Cant get can connection through the firewall. Have set up the PING command - access-list acl_out permit icmp any any access-group acl_out in interface outside access-group acl_out in interface inside cant ping through even, keep getting this message 302010: 0 in use, 36 most used Can some one help please. Thanks * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21578t=21569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNA [7:21579]
Is SNA on the CCIE exam? I know there used to be a special CCIE test for SNA/IP integration, I have my lab in June and I obviously don't want to study any unnecessary topics. Thanks. Guy H. Lupi NOC Engineer Eureka GGN 270 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor NY, NY 10016 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21579t=21579 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vpn with cisco 1720 [7:21577]
Hi all: I need to configure VPN in cisco 1720.The configuration should use cisco secure client 1.1 for cable or dialup remote user from the internet.could guys let me know what is the best way to do that and also what type of security is appropriate. Next thing,Can I use proxy server behind the vpn router? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21577t=21577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lat to Tcp -- Tcp Lat [7:21581]
Hi All, I am new to LAT translation so please bear with me. The scenario I have is 2 routers connected by a serial link. I have a DEC Server on one end and a Client on the other. To my knowledge both the server and the client are run LAT with a service name of SERVICE. Since LAT is not routable I will need to translate from LAT to TCP then TCP to LAT. My question is exactly how do i do this. I have tried using the following translate commands, but am unable to get anything to work. Tried R1- translate lat SERVICE tcp 192.168.1.211 R2- translate lat SERVICE TCP 192.168.1.107 R1 - - E0 - 192.168.1.105 DEC Server running LAT 192.168.1.107 R2 - E0 - 192.168.2.209 Client runng LAT 192.168.2.211 Thanks in advance for any help.. Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21581t=21581 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How a host makes IP forwarding decisions [7:21580]
Here is an excerpt of a post on the OpenView Forum list. It's related
to our neverending discussions of how hosts make forwarding decisions,
when they forward packets to their gateway, and when they send ARP
requests. I've never seen it presented quite this way and thought it
was interesting to look at. (Thanks to Fred Reimer on the OVForum list
for this.)
I find that it helps to understand the way NNM works, and networks in
general in fact, if one has a certain amount of programming
experience. What better way to explain subnet masking, for instance,
than a chunk of code such as:
IPAddr myIPAddr = ipbystring(10.1.1.2);
IPAddr myMask = ipbystring(255.255.255.0);
IPAddr mygwAddr = ipbystring(10.1.1.1);
MACAddr gwMAC;
int sendpacket(IpPacket *p, IPAddr *destIPAddr)
{
IPAddr mySubnet;
IPAddr destSubnet;
MACAddr destMAC;
int ret;
Frame *frame;
if ((frame = malloc(sizeof(Frame)) == NULL) {
return -1;
}
mySubnet = myIPAddr myMask;
destSubnet = destIPAddr myMask;
if (mySubnet == destSubnet) {
/* on same subnet */
destMAC = ARPforMAC(destIPAddr);
setFrameDest(destMac);
} else {
/* on different subnet */
gwMAC = ARPforMAC(mygwAddr);
setFrameDest(gwMAC);
}
setFramePayload(frame, p);
ret = sendFrame(frame);
free(frame);
return ret;
}
It's not exactly C, but it should get the point across. Granted, no
production IP stacks probably don't look like this at all, but
the certainly would follow the same logic. If you can understand this
then you shouldn't have any problem understanding subnet
masks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21580t=21580
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21557]
You can fit what I know about IS-IS in a pretty small container but I Understand that IS-IS communicates using CLNS PDU's and and an IS-IS router must have and ISO address known as a NET address, etc. so I thought there were some interdependancies. Dave Peter Van Oene wrote: Cisco fully supports ISO CLNS however, ISO CLNS has been removed from the protocols tested on the CCIE Lab. Integrated ISIS is not dependant on CLNS and thus remains a valid exam topic. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 11:03 AM MADMAN wrote: As far as I know Cisco IOS supports CLNS only as much as in needed to supoort IS-IS. Dave Jason Gardiner wrote: I'll be brief. Check out the Archives. Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html -- Thanks, Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. - Norton Juster -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21583t=21557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21582]
Know the basics of configuring ISIS to route IP. That's all I'll say. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Lover Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21582t=21582 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary address on router [7:21576]
I'd say Yes. I've never tried this so take it with a grain of salt. First verify that all your PCs are appropriately addressed. configuration changes take effect immediately. So: config t ip subnet-zero int e0 ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.128 cntrl Z Should do the trick. -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Secondary address on router [7:21576] Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21584t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21558]
Integrated ISIS does not use CLNS outside of sharing some packet structures. It remains a valid exam topic. Peter Do be aware that CLNS is still used in some telco operations maintenance networks (e.g., for SONET). While I wouldn't consider it a mainstream topic and would be inclined to move it to voice provider tests, it's not dead. Just as a stray point, if you study CLNS, you will see the ancestry of a good many features in IPv6. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21585t=21558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secondary address on router [7:21576]
Zero downtime, no, but quite minimal yes. Out of curiosity I started pingin router A from router B. Changed the mask on router A and dropped 1 packet during the change. It then resumed pinging even though the masks were not the same so the impact was relatively unnoticeable. Dave sam sneed wrote: Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21586t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary address on router [7:21576]
Would there/could there be a concern about ARP table cache entries and the associated MAC addresses? I've made changes before and found that I had to clear entries (reboot) hosts such as firewalls because of cached entries. Chris -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secondary address on router [7:21576] I'd say Yes. I've never tried this so take it with a grain of salt. First verify that all your PCs are appropriately addressed. configuration changes take effect immediately. So: config t ip subnet-zero int e0 ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.128 cntrl Z Should do the trick. -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Secondary address on router [7:21576] Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21587t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Local Director Question [7:21589]
A typical physical topology for a Local Director is as follow: Clients-Hub or Switch(Vlan1)-LocalDirector-Hub or Switch(Vlan2)-Real Servers However, instead of using two Physically separate switches for the distinct VLANs, what if I patch the LocalDirector into ports 5/1 and 5/2 on my Cat5500 switch, with port 5/1 being on VLAN1 and 5/2 being on VLAN2? This seems like virtually an identical topology as the example shown above however there is one problem that I am predicting: Of course, all inbound AND outbound traffic directed to the Virtual IP of the LocalDirector MUST flow through it. The problem is that I have an RSM router on my CAT5500 switch and since I have established two interfaces on it: interface VLAN1 and VLAN2, what would keep the traffic originating from my Real Servers and destined back to the clients from bypassing the VLAN2 switch port which is the LocalDirector and instead get routed straight across to VLAN1 where the traffic will go out directly back to the originating client? John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21589t=21589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ IOS 11 bridging [7:21515]
Yeah this is very perplexing. Here is the bridge AGS config if any would like to offer suggestions. Have tried assigning IP addys to serials no help. Everything works well when routing just cant get these bridges to function. Very simple config: 2501 S1 AGS S2---AGS S33102 S0 interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache clockrate 125000 bridge-group 1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache clockrate 125000 bridge-group 1 ! interface Serial2 no ip address no ip route-cache clockrate 125000 bridge-group 2 ! interface Serial3 no ip address no ip route-cache clockrate 125000 bridge-group 2 ! bridge crb bridge 1 protocol ieee bridge 2 protocol ieee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AGS+ IOS 11 bridging [7:21515] Boy, haven't worked on an AGS in 6 years!!! If CRB is simply a software issue than it probably would work but my guess is that there may well be hardware limitions on the AGS, like the inability to do ISL encapsulation on a CAT4000. Dave Dan Faulk wrote: Anyone out there done much with bridging serial ports on the AGS? The Cisco documentation says different things on the subject one source says concurrent bridging wont work on this box others make little distinction. I wish to bridge on the 8 serial ports and route on the 12 Ethernet ports. Encap on the serials is not important although I will be passing IP. Cant just try and see on this one as it will determine which cables I purchase for my lab and money is tight. TIA Dan -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21588t=21515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN over two switched T1 channels? [7:21551]
This is true. It is actually simple. Configure your serial interface to autodiscover the external Switched 56 CSU. Then setup a standard dial string, dialer profile, or legacy DDR config. It is EXACTLY like dialing out a serial interface using an external modem and a DB60 pin to DB25 pin Cisco Serial to Modem/Codex cable. Your PRI will autonegotiate down to 56K instead of 64K just like when it answers a modem. You may require the isdn incoming-voice data on your PRI serial config. John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21590t=21551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap Memory [7:21560]
Locate the exact memory type you need for your particular router/switch, then simply buy any brand that carries it. Doesn't have to be Cisco memory. Sean Michael Ibidunni wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Folks, There was a link and details of someone who has cheap memory for routers to sell posted in the last 2/3 weeks, please if you have that mail kindly forward it to me. Regards Michael Ibidunni Systems Engineer Business Data Services City M25 Team NTL: Tel:0207 562 5800 Mobile: 07866 625922 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21591t=21560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access control lists that block even-IP traffic ou [7:21592]
Dear Friends, I am trying to figure out how to block even/odd access out of the subnet!. I have managed to see the effect of the last bit of the last octet , yet wouuldn't know how to get the wild card mask !. Could you please help me as I will be taking the CCAI fast track on wednesday. Suranjith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21592t=21592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packet loss [7:21281]
something that has not been addressed are the NICs in the servers. Compaq server NICs are particularly bad when using redudant links. It is best advised that you disable the heartbeats on those puppies and possibley reboot the server after doing so. let me know if this works. Stevan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lopez, Robert wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Group, I have a problem with a certain vlan on our network. The problem goes something like this... I have a vlan105 interface created on a cat 6509. The primary ip address is x.x.105.254. The interface has secondary addresses of x.x.155.254, x.x.156.254 and x.x.157.254. Servers on this network are dropping packets, one in particular, serverA-x.x.155.219, is dropping packets 50% of the time. Moved the server to a different switch, same vlan105, the problem continues. Moved the server to vlan100, it works fine. Replaced cable and nics. Ensured proper speed and duplex are configured. No output from a debug vlan or span. Opened a TAC case a few days ago and the problem still remains. I just got a suggestion to remove and rebuild the vlan105 interface on the router. That will happen later this afternoon. Any other suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Robert Robert M. Lopez Network Planning CIT PGRD Ann Arbor Pfizer Global Research Development Phone 734-622-3948 Fax 734-622-1690 There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle. ...Albert Einstein Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21593t=21281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21557]
Although your correct that routers in an ISIS domain require a valid Network Entity Title (NET), the point about using CLNS PDU's is inaccurate, though I admit widely misunderstood. ISIS packets are actually directly encapsulated at layer two and thus do not use the services of any protocol at Layer 3, CLNP or otherwise. There has been and likely still is, and probably will continue to be, lots of talk about encapsulating ISIS PDU's in IP, but CLNP encapsulation has never been a reality or a goal as far as I can tell. So, to answer your question, there really are no dependencies and until the folks in the CCIE lab program pull ISIS from the blueprint, you'll need to learn it. Since ISIS is actually rising steadily in popularity from a deployment perspective, I would hazard a guess that it will stay in existing, and end up in new, exam blueprints for quite some time. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 1:12 PM MADMAN wrote: You can fit what I know about IS-IS in a pretty small container but I Understand that IS-IS communicates using CLNS PDU's and and an IS-IS router must have and ISO address known as a NET address, etc. so I thought there were some interdependancies. Dave Peter Van Oene wrote: Cisco fully supports ISO CLNS however, ISO CLNS has been removed from the protocols tested on the CCIE Lab. Integrated ISIS is not dependant on CLNS and thus remains a valid exam topic. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/1/2001 at 11:03 AM MADMAN wrote: As far as I know Cisco IOS supports CLNS only as much as in needed to supoort IS-IS. Dave Jason Gardiner wrote: I'll be brief. Check out the Archives. Cisco Lover wrote: Hey guys.. By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? Any one here can please specify briefly. Thanks for help Cisco Lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html -- Thanks, Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint E|Solutions You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. - Norton Juster -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21594t=21557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap Memory [7:21560]
I have had good luck at: www.memoryx.com Dave Sean Knox wrote: Locate the exact memory type you need for your particular router/switch, then simply buy any brand that carries it. Doesn't have to be Cisco memory. Sean Michael Ibidunni wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Folks, There was a link and details of someone who has cheap memory for routers to sell posted in the last 2/3 weeks, please if you have that mail kindly forward it to me. Regards Michael Ibidunni Systems Engineer Business Data Services City M25 Team NTL: Tel:0207 562 5800 Mobile: 07866 625922 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21595t=21560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596]
All, This lab was put together and used by 4 guys to prepare for the CCIE R/S, the good news is that ALL 4 PASSED THE FIRST TIME, we would like to sell the entire lab, the lab has all you need to prepare for the exam, if you are interested, please respond to this e-mail.. SERIOUS BUYERS ONLY PLEASE Thanks Louie J. Kouncar CCIE #7994 TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer WorldCom Web Hosting (Tysons) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21596t=21596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cheap Memory [7:21560]
Try to follow the KG2 link from my RouterChief link below - they have very good prices. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cheap Memory [7:21560] I have had good luck at: www.memoryx.com Dave Sean Knox wrote: Locate the exact memory type you need for your particular router/switch, then simply buy any brand that carries it. Doesn't have to be Cisco memory. Sean Michael Ibidunni wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Folks, There was a link and details of someone who has cheap memory for routers to sell posted in the last 2/3 weeks, please if you have that mail kindly forward it to me. Regards Michael Ibidunni Systems Engineer Business Data Services City M25 Team NTL: Tel:0207 562 5800 Mobile: 07866 625922 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21597t=21560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access control lists that block even-IP traffic ou [7:21598]
Your mask for the last octet should end in an even number. This forces a check of the last bit position. If you want to allow/deny an even number then your test against address should end in an even number. If it is for an odd number, then the test against address should end in odd. Ex: access-list 10 deny 172.16.8.1 0.0.0.254 access-list 10 permit any This would deny all odd addresses on the 172.16.8.0 /24 network. Change the 1 in the last octet of the test against to 0 and it denies all even addresses. Todd Lammle's book, CCNA Study Guide, ISBN 0782126472 does an excellent job of explaining access-lists and wild card masks. I would recommend your getting it. If you're going to teach others, you need to understand this at a deeper level than what your question indicates you currently have in this often misunderstood and difficult to teach area. You will find that those students who had difficulty with subnetting will definitely crash burn when it comes to wild card masks. It requires various approaches to get the concept across. HTH, Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy SUranjith Ariyapperuma wrote: Dear Friends, I am trying to figure out how to block even/odd access out of the subnet!. I have managed to see the effect of the last bit of the last octet , yet wouuldn't know how to get the wild card mask !. Could you please help me as I will be taking the CCAI fast track on wednesday. Suranjith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21598t=21598 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596]
Hi, Louie I want to know how much does your ccie lab costs for sale ? And also let me know if you have any good study materials for the written exam because i failed the exam last week. It was harder than i thought. Thanks. You can reach me at email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21599t=21596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
connectivity issue [7:21600]
Guys (and gals), I was wondering if anyone had ran into this problem. I have a private, pt-pt network terminating on my side with a 2524 running 11.1. This is connected into a 2900 switch. My ISP comes in on a 2610 through a PIX running 6.1.(Whose inside IP is the gateway for all PCs) It is also hitting the 2900. My machines behind the firewall can get to the internet and also ping the 2524 Ethernet interface on my side, but that is as far as they will go. I have put a static route into the PIX pointing any traffic for the 10.4.0.0 network (the far side of the pt-pt) directed to the inside IP of the 2524. from the PIX, I can ping the 2524, and any address on the far network. But the PCs cannot go past the Ethernet of the 2524. They can ping the inside interface of the 2524, but not even the WAN interface of this router. I have also added a static for the Network of the WAN link, a /30. I don't understand how the PIX can ping through the 2524 to the remote network and the PCs cannot, when all the routes are in the PIX to direct these packets to the correct destination(2524). Could it have to do with the fact the times I'm getting on those pings( around 600ms) are above the TTL on the PCs or could I be missing something else? This is probably going to turn out to be a stupid question, and I will regret sending it. Be gentle Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21600t=21600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596]
Try boson 1,2,3 and ccbootcamp.com's written workbook or their bootcamp, that is what I used primarily on top of the following...halabi,caslow and doyle...they also have good deals on CCIE lab kits and rack time -Original Message- From: wol kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596] Hi, Louie I want to know how much does your ccie lab costs for sale ? And also let me know if you have any good study materials for the written exam because i failed the exam last week. It was harder than i thought. Thanks. You can reach me at email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21601t=21596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495]
What opinion did you previously express regarding the state of CCNP tests? Mike Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... There must be a problem with me, because I didn't find anything on the CIT exam to be poorly worded or difficult to understand. Then again, I used to work at a law firm so perhaps my background gives me an unfair advantage. (-: Previously I've expressed my opinion about the state of the CCNP exams. That opinion holds true for CIT as well. And that in itself is likely the real reason why I didn't find any of the questions difficult to understand... -- Leigh Anne (just Remote Access left...) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mike Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495] I can't agree with you more about the questions being worded badly. I also just finished the CIT exam for my CCNP. Every CCNP test I went into I felt very confident and found myself during the test wondering where the hell did they come up with some of these questions. You have to be a laywer to interpret some of them. Although I did well on all of the tests an am glad that I got the CCNP cert, I really don't feel like my knowledge of networking was put to the test. I hope the CCIE is more realistic. Anyway, congrats and good luck! Mike Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here's a thanks to all of you who directly and indirectly helped me pass my CCNP exams. I passed CIT this morning as the last one. The CIT exam was the one I felt best prepared for, but passed with a lower score that any of the others. I felt that the questions were worded very badly compared to the other exams, and I was asked questions about specific details that I did not recall having read in any of my books. Anyway, I passed - so I'm happy! A little advise to those of you who are on the first step on the CCNP ladder: 1) Read at least two books for each exam, unless you feel very sure you know everything you need to. A good rule that I have used, is to get a study guide with good reviews. You can search, find and check for those on http://www.amazon.com. A study guide usually uses an easier language that you can better understand if you're reading about the topic for the first time. As a second book, I like to buy a CiscoPress course or exam book, because they are more detail specific regarding what they want you to know for the exam. I do not recommend CiscoPress course or exam books as the only book unless you are good at reading and understanding technical explanations. They can be a little hard to understand if you're not really sure what they're trying to tell you. 2) Download the Cisco exams from Boson. Take all three test exams, and then buy the full version of the one you score lowest in. 3) Look on the Internet for other good helping tools or descriptions. For the CIT, I recommend using the Flash Cards that Priscilla has available (http://www.priscilla.com), and for the BCMSN exam, I recommend my own applications to help you train the commands on the Catalyst 5000 and calculate Multicast layer 2 and 3 addresses. Those two applications can be found by following my RouterChief link below. Now on to CSS1 starting Monday or Tuesday when I expect the book to arrive. Have a nice weekend, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21603t=21495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CLNS and ISIS in RS Lab??? [7:21602]
By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus, how far they can go to ask about ISIS?? I attended the CCIE Power Session at Networkers 2001 here in Copenhagen this Saturday, and they said something along the lines of: Know how to configure basic ISIS for IP. It will be in the lab, though not all of them. As far as i know there are many things which require support of CLNS in ISIS?? For routing IP? No, not really. -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21602t=21602 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495]
It can be found in the archives... http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/cisco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mike Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495] What opinion did you previously express regarding the state of CCNP tests? Mike Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... There must be a problem with me, because I didn't find anything on the CIT exam to be poorly worded or difficult to understand. Then again, I used to work at a law firm so perhaps my background gives me an unfair advantage. (-: Previously I've expressed my opinion about the state of the CCNP exams. That opinion holds true for CIT as well. And that in itself is likely the real reason why I didn't find any of the questions difficult to understand... -- Leigh Anne (just Remote Access left...) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mike Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495] I can't agree with you more about the questions being worded badly. I also just finished the CIT exam for my CCNP. Every CCNP test I went into I felt very confident and found myself during the test wondering where the hell did they come up with some of these questions. You have to be a laywer to interpret some of them. Although I did well on all of the tests an am glad that I got the CCNP cert, I really don't feel like my knowledge of networking was put to the test. I hope the CCIE is more realistic. Anyway, congrats and good luck! Mike Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here's a thanks to all of you who directly and indirectly helped me pass my CCNP exams. I passed CIT this morning as the last one. The CIT exam was the one I felt best prepared for, but passed with a lower score that any of the others. I felt that the questions were worded very badly compared to the other exams, and I was asked questions about specific details that I did not recall having read in any of my books. Anyway, I passed - so I'm happy! A little advise to those of you who are on the first step on the CCNP ladder: 1) Read at least two books for each exam, unless you feel very sure you know everything you need to. A good rule that I have used, is to get a study guide with good reviews. You can search, find and check for those on http://www.amazon.com. A study guide usually uses an easier language that you can better understand if you're reading about the topic for the first time. As a second book, I like to buy a CiscoPress course or exam book, because they are more detail specific regarding what they want you to know for the exam. I do not recommend CiscoPress course or exam books as the only book unless you are good at reading and understanding technical explanations. They can be a little hard to understand if you're not really sure what they're trying to tell you. 2) Download the Cisco exams from Boson. Take all three test exams, and then buy the full version of the one you score lowest in. 3) Look on the Internet for other good helping tools or descriptions. For the CIT, I recommend using the Flash Cards that Priscilla has available (http://www.priscilla.com), and for the BCMSN exam, I recommend my own applications to help you train the commands on the Catalyst 5000 and calculate Multicast layer 2 and 3 addresses. Those two applications can be found by following my RouterChief link below. Now on to CSS1 starting Monday or Tuesday when I expect the book to arrive. Have a nice weekend, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21604t=21495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lat to Tcp -- Tcp Lat [7:21581]
Here is a LAT TELNET Lab that might help you... http://www.boson.com/promo/router_labs/lat-telnet/lat-telnet.htm John Swartz CCIE, CCNP, CCDP Boson Practice Tests http://www.boson.com Ryan Cochran wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, I am new to LAT translation so please bear with me. The scenario I have is 2 routers connected by a serial link. I have a DEC Server on one end and a Client on the other. To my knowledge both the server and the client are run LAT with a service name of SERVICE. Since LAT is not routable I will need to translate from LAT to TCP then TCP to LAT. My question is exactly how do i do this. I have tried using the following translate commands, but am unable to get anything to work. Tried R1- translate lat SERVICE tcp 192.168.1.211 R2- translate lat SERVICE TCP 192.168.1.107 R1 - - E0 - 192.168.1.105 DEC Server running LAT 192.168.1.107 R2 - E0 - 192.168.2.209 Client runng LAT 192.168.2.211 Thanks in advance for any help.. Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21605t=21581 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary address on router [7:21576]
I have done this when a contractor had set up our border router with the wrong subnet mask you can change with zero down time as long as all hosts are configured correctly D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin CCNP -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 01:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Secondary address on router [7:21576] Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21606t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: When to put Bandwidth on interfaces??? [7:21415]
I have also bumped up the bandwidth as high as possible in lab situations or staging areas where I was TFTPing a large file across a lab network that included a back-to-back serial link. I would have thought bumping up the clockrate parameter would have had more effect than changing the bandwidth parameter. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/10/2001 09:04 am - Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: When to put Bandwidth on Sent by: interfaces??? [7:21415] nobody@groups tudy.com 29/09/2001 03:28 am Please respond to Priscilla Oppenheimer I would say set the interface bandwidth if the default doesn't match reality and you are using a feature that uses the bandwidth. IGRP, EIGRP, and OSPF use bandwidth in their routing protocol metrics. I don't know about your question about bringing up an backup (ISDN) link. Anyone? So, when might the default not match reality? Serial ports default to 1.5 Mbps even though the circuit could be faster or slower. You could have a Frame Relay CIR that is less, and you might want your routing protocol metrics to match the CIR rather than the default, to avoid a route getting picked as best when it's really not. I have also bumped up the bandwidth as high as possible in lab situations or staging areas where I was TFTPing a large file across a lab network that included a back-to-back serial link. At 07:19 AM 9/28/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any time that you don't want EIGRP to send more traffic on a frame relay link then it can handle. Remember that EIGRP will use 50% of what ever is set as bandwidth. The goal of the ip bandwidth-percent EIGRP command is to make sure that the routing protocol itself doesn't use too much bandwidth. Something is probably wrong if the routing protocol is using 50 percent of the bandwidth, and just giving it more bandwidth to consume might work, but might also cause you not to troubleshoot the real problem. EIGRP is generally a quiet protocol, except for the incessant hellos, which don't use much bandwidth. I think the ip bandwidth-percent command got added because of people who were running EIGRP on unstable networks and on networks with slow links. When EIGRP converges (during startup) or reconverges (during problems) it could use a lot of bandwidth on a slow link. I'm sure there are uses for the command, but I think it's kind of a Band-Aid command. Priscilla [stuff snipped] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21607t=21415 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secondary address on router [7:21576]
Thanks everyone. I changed it with absolutely zero noticeable downtime. sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello group, I have a question that could probably be easily anwered. We are changing our subnet mask to add a new network. Its is on a 4700 router with ip classless setup. We use real IP's but i'll but private ones on the example.. Ex. eth0 is now 172.16.10.0/24. I want to split this network in half so I wish to make eth0 172.16.10.0/25 and eth1 172.16.10.128/25. Eth0 leads to our production network. I want to have this change over with zero downtime. The Ip address on the interface (172.16.10.1) must stay the same. Is there anyway to change the subnet mask only with zero downtime? UNIX allows you to put 2 statements on a singel line split by a ; . Does cisco ios have something simliar? sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21608t=21576 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lat to Tcp -- Tcp Lat [7:21581]
You might consider changing to IP and telnet if possible. One thing you need to find out is how the device remote to the server get's it's config from. Some of the older LAT devices get the config from the server as they have no NVRAM or such. I was never able to get Cisco to confirm that the remote device could get its config from the server when the router does translation. Other than that, I'm no help. :) Scott Meyer CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, etc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Cochran Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lat to Tcp -- Tcp Lat [7:21581] Hi All, I am new to LAT translation so please bear with me. The scenario I have is 2 routers connected by a serial link. I have a DEC Server on one end and a Client on the other. To my knowledge both the server and the client are run LAT with a service name of SERVICE. Since LAT is not routable I will need to translate from LAT to TCP then TCP to LAT. My question is exactly how do i do this. I have tried using the following translate commands, but am unable to get anything to work. Tried R1- translate lat SERVICE tcp 192.168.1.211 R2- translate lat SERVICE TCP 192.168.1.107 R1 - - E0 - 192.168.1.105 DEC Server running LAT 192.168.1.107 R2 - E0 - 192.168.2.209 Client runng LAT 192.168.2.211 Thanks in advance for any help.. Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21609t=21581 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help me to configure async callback in 2511 router [7:21611]
I want to configure asyn callback in router 2511. the configuration is below, but when receive callback number from client, the router cannot initiate callback function. version 12.0 service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! boot system flash enable secret 5 $1$XpI9$5zIQu14lpRMz53STOwOH y1 ! username back callback-dialstring callback-line 1 password ok ip subnet-zero ip domain-name hnpt.com ip name-server 10.10.24.4 chat-script resetModem atz OK ats0=1 OK chat-script startModem atz OK ats0=1 OK chat-script callback ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY AT OK ATDT \T TIMEOUT 45 CONNECT \c chat-script offhook ATH1 OK \c ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.24.1 255.255.254.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! interface Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast ip mtu 512 encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache async default routing async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool local-pool ppp callback accept ppp authentication pap callin ! ip local pool local-pool 10.10.24.238 10.10.24.254 ip default-gateway 10.10.24.2 no ip classless ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 session-timeout 5 autoselect during-login script startup startModem script modem-off-hook offhook script callback callback login local modem answer-timeout 3 modem autoconfigure type usr_sportster modem InOut transport input all autohangup callback forced-wait 10 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware ! I debug some output: General OS: Modem control/process activation debugging is on PPP: PPP authentication debugging is on PPP protocol negotiation debugging is on Chat Scripts: Chat scripts activity debugging is on Callback: Callback activity debugging is on and the result is: 1d22h: TTY1: DSR came up 1d22h: TTY1: destroy timer type 1 1d22h: TTY1: destroy timer type 0 1d22h: TTY1: create timer type 2, 300 seconds 1d22h: tty1: Modem: IDLE-READY 1d22h: As1 LCP: I CONFREQ [Closed] id 0 len 23 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACCM 0x (0x0206) 1d22h: As1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x2477 (0x05062477) 1d22h: As1 LCP: PFC (0x0702) 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802) 1d22h: As1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306) 1d22h: As1 LCP: Lower layer not up, Fast Starting 1d22h: As1 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated line 1d22h: As1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open 1d22h: As1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 44 len 24 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 1d22h: As1 LCP: AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 1d22h: As1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x1A7AD1B6 (0x05061A7AD1B6) 1d22h: As1 LCP: PFC (0x0702) 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802) 1d22h: As1 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 0 len 23 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACCM 0x (0x0206) 1d22h: As1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x2477 (0x05062477) 1d22h: As1 LCP: PFC (0x0702) 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802) 1d22h: As1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306) *Mar 2 22:35:00: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Async1, changed state to up 1d22h: As1 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 44 len 24 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 1d22h: As1 LCP: AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 1d22h: As1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x1A7AD1B6 (0x05061A7AD1B6) 1d22h: As1 LCP: PFC (0x0702) 1d22h: As1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802) 1d22h: As1 LCP: State is Open 1d22h: As1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by this end 1d22h: As1 LCP: I IDENTIFY [Open] id 1 len 18 magic 0x2477 MSRASV4.00 1d22h: As1 LCP: I IDENTIFY [Open] id 2 len 20 magic 0x2477 MSRAS-1-KING 1d22h: As1 PAP: I AUTH-REQ id 22 len 22 from callback 1d22h: As1 PAP: Authenticating peer callback 1d22h: As1 PAP: O AUTH-ACK id 22 len 5 1d22h: As1 MCB: User callback Callback Number - Client ANY 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 208 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D0 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: O Request Id 208 Callback Type Client-Num delay 0 1d22h: As1 PPP: Phase is CBCP *Mar 2 22:35:01: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Async1, change d state to up 1d22h: As1 MCB: Timeout in state WAIT_RESPONSE 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 209 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D1 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: O Request Id 209 Callback Type Client-Num delay 0 1d22h: TTY16: autoconfigure probe started 1d22h: As1 MCB: Timeout in state WAIT_RESPONSE 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 210 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D2 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: O Request Id 210 Callback Type Client-Num delay 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: Timeout in state WAIT_RESPONSE 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 211 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D3 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: O Request Id 211 Callback Type Client-Num delay 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: Timeout in state WAIT_RESPONSE 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 212 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D4 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: O Request Id 212 Callback Type Client-Num delay 0 1d22h: As1 MCB: Timeout in state WAIT_RESPONSE 1d22h: Async1 PPP: O MCB Request(1) id 213 len 9 1d22h: Async1 MCB: O 1 D5 0 9 2 5 0 1 0 1d22h: As1
Re: How to purge MLS cache [7:21540]
Just to clarify, I ONLY want to purge (refresh) the mls cache, but NOT want to disable the mls. So should I use clear mls ip or else? Thanks All. Dominick Marino wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... clear mls ip Regards, Dom Thomas N. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, I would like to purge the entries in the MLS cache of the 6509, then let the switch relearn the MAC. What commend should I use? Thanks All! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21612t=21540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCMSN Study [7:21613]
Hi all Would those who have sat the Switching Exam for the CCNP, share some information as to what are the areas to concentrate on more than others. Is there much ATM questions in the exam? What is the passing score? Was the exam difficult? Are there many ambiguous questions? Any infomration on how to approach this exam would be appreciated. Thanks Thuveshen Cooppan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21613t=21613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE written advice? [7:21614]
Am going to take CCIE R/S this Friday, any last minute advice? Any changes on CCIE written format recently? What I have been reading is Caslow book version 1, routing TCP/IP vol 1, Internet Routing Architecture ver 1. anything good to read during last days? thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21614t=21614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring Module Problem for Catalyst 5000 [7:21610]
Hello, I ordered a Token Ring module from someone off ebay. I stuck it in my cat 5000 and it said that it had an invalid configuration (probably because there was just previously a different module in it) and the status was faulty. I did a clear config all and reset, and it no longer said that there was an invalid configuration for the module, just that it was faulty. Periodically, it says module is not responding, resetting module. I moved it to a different slot, and now the status changed to other, but it comes up with the same periodic message. I know both slots work fine. I bought it and the guy I bought it from guaranteed it wasn't DOA. Is there something else I need to do to get it working? Joe Carr Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21610t=21610 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cheap Memory [7:21560]
www.anthonypanda.com is where i eventually got memory and back to back cables from, was the cheapest and also quickest. Very professional outfit. -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 4:48 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cheap Memory [7:21560] Locate the exact memory type you need for your particular router/switch, then simply buy any brand that carries it. Doesn't have to be Cisco memory. Sean Michael Ibidunni wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Folks, There was a link and details of someone who has cheap memory for routers to sell posted in the last 2/3 weeks, please if you have that mail kindly forward it to me. Regards Michael Ibidunni Systems Engineer Business Data Services City M25 Team NTL: Tel:0207 562 5800 Mobile: 07866 625922 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21616t=21560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Copy FTP [7:21470]
If it's of any use to the original poster, 11.2(17) on the 4700M and 2514 doesn't seem to support either copy ftp or copy network (invalid input). However 11.2(17) on a 7500 might - it claims incomplete command instead of invalid input (I don't have a suitable playpen so I'm not putting in the full command), and copy ftp ? produces a list of possibilities. Note that copy ? on the 7500 does not give ftp as an option, though. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/10/2001 11:49 am - John Swartz cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Copy FTP [7:21470] nobody@groups tudy.com 29/09/2001 02:24 pm Please respond to John Swartz You can use the FTP ability for downloading flash or even testing FTP connections by copying to he NULL: device. Full_T1#copy ftp://download.boson.com/utils/confreg.exe null: Accessing ftp://download.boson.com/utils/confreg.exe... Loading utils/confreg.exe !! [OK - 67259/1024 bytes] 67259 bytes copied in 9.844 secs (7473 bytes/sec) Full_T1#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-DS-M), Version 12.1(7), RELEASE SOFTWARE John Swartz CCIE, CCNP, CCDP Boson Practice Tests http://www.boson.com Chuck Larrieu wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... interesting question. A look through the master command references for 12.1 and 12.2 do not reveal this as a valid command. on the other hand: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/atm/c8540/12_0/4a_11a/comman d/appd.htm#33805 watch the wrap this reference indicates the command copy network is now copy ftp and that the change occurs in 12.0 I smell something nasty in the CCIE Lab, one 12.1 is fully rolled out. ; - Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hagyard, Tim Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 7:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Copy FTP [7:21470] I'm trying to find out what the first IOS rev that supported the copy ftp feature is (routers and cat switches). Thanks Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21615t=21470 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Key To Pass the Exam [7:21556]
100% guarantee? Even if I don't study? Suppose I deliberately try to answer all question incorrectly ;- BTW, I have some great Florida property to sell. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of afzaal adam Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The Key To Pass the Exam [7:21556] Dear Friends, This is time to find out a website with remarable 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. So visit http://www.smartcert.net for 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. They have also developed Study Guides for MCSE, CCNA, CCNP, SUN SOLARIS, SUN JAVA, OCP and CIW. Regards, Gemini _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21617t=21556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ IOS 11 bridging [7:21515]
OK. I'll bite. What is the relationship between ISL and CRB? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AGS+ IOS 11 bridging [7:21515] Boy, haven't worked on an AGS in 6 years!!! If CRB is simply a software issue than it probably would work but my guess is that there may well be hardware limitions on the AGS, like the inability to do ISL encapsulation on a CAT4000. Dave Dan Faulk wrote: Anyone out there done much with bridging serial ports on the AGS? The Cisco documentation says different things on the subject one source says concurrent bridging wont work on this box others make little distinction. I wish to bridge on the 8 serial ports and route on the 12 Ethernet ports. Encap on the serials is not important although I will be passing IP. Cant just try and see on this one as it will determine which cables I purchase for my lab and money is tight. TIA Dan -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21618t=21515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written advice? [7:21614]
get a good night's sleep. relax. read the questions. you have plenty of time. THINK! knock 'em dead! Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean Wu Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written advice? [7:21614] Am going to take CCIE R/S this Friday, any last minute advice? Any changes on CCIE written format recently? What I have been reading is Caslow book version 1, routing TCP/IP vol 1, Internet Routing Architecture ver 1. anything good to read during last days? thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21619t=21614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Copy FTP [7:21470]
I believe this feature became available in 12.0 I posted a link in my original reply http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/atm/c8540/12_0/4a_11a/comman d/appd.htm#33805 watch the wrap Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Copy FTP [7:21470] If it's of any use to the original poster, 11.2(17) on the 4700M and 2514 doesn't seem to support either copy ftp or copy network (invalid input). However 11.2(17) on a 7500 might - it claims incomplete command instead of invalid input (I don't have a suitable playpen so I'm not putting in the full command), and copy ftp ? produces a list of possibilities. Note that copy ? on the 7500 does not give ftp as an option, though. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/10/2001 11:49 am - John Swartz cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Copy FTP [7:21470] nobody@groups tudy.com 29/09/2001 02:24 pm Please respond to John Swartz You can use the FTP ability for downloading flash or even testing FTP connections by copying to he NULL: device. Full_T1#copy ftp://download.boson.com/utils/confreg.exe null: Accessing ftp://download.boson.com/utils/confreg.exe... Loading utils/confreg.exe !! [OK - 67259/1024 bytes] 67259 bytes copied in 9.844 secs (7473 bytes/sec) Full_T1#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-DS-M), Version 12.1(7), RELEASE SOFTWARE John Swartz CCIE, CCNP, CCDP Boson Practice Tests http://www.boson.com Chuck Larrieu wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... interesting question. A look through the master command references for 12.1 and 12.2 do not reveal this as a valid command. on the other hand: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/atm/c8540/12_0/4a_11a/comman d/appd.htm#33805 watch the wrap this reference indicates the command copy network is now copy ftp and that the change occurs in 12.0 I smell something nasty in the CCIE Lab, one 12.1 is fully rolled out. ; - Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hagyard, Tim Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 7:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Copy FTP [7:21470] I'm trying to find out what the first IOS rev that supported the copy ftp feature is (routers and cat switches). Thanks Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21620t=21470 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSS1 - Books available (my findings, what are yours...) [7:21621]
After finishing my CCNP, I am now looking towards CSS1, but I cannot find many books out there. The only ones I have found that are made for the exams are all from Cisco Press, and only one of them are out. Two others are on the way, and the last one is not even on the drawing board yet. I have gathered my discoveries so far on http://www.oledrews.com/css1 - so if you know of a book that I have not listed, please let me know. Also, this list can be used by others going for the CSS1 to get a selection of books available. Another thing, all the exams except for MCNS has the exam number 9E0-57x - but the MCNS has 640-442. Could that mean that it is about to expire, but that Cisco has yet not notified about it? Thanks for any comments to this, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.RouterChief.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21621t=21621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Key To Pass the Exam [7:21556]
I wonder if Pakistani laws cover false Internet guarantees... If not, I'm sure we can contact smartcert.net via their Hotmail account. Very legitimate, no doubt. :-) Organization: smartcert.net smartcert.net smartcert.net office 7, 8 Capital Trade Center Islamabad, FD 44000 PK Phone: 92-320-4912498 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registrar Name: Register.com Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com Domain Name: smartcert.net -Original Message- From: afzaal adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The Key To Pass the Exam [7:21556] Dear Friends, This is time to find out a website with remarable 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. So visit http://www.smartcert.net for 100% Passing Guarantee in CCNA and CCNP Certifications. They have also developed Study Guides for MCSE, CCNA, CCNP, SUN SOLARIS, SUN JAVA, OCP and CIW. Regards, Gemini _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21622t=21556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP Multilink studies - interesting results [7:21623]
A couple of weeks ago there were a couple of discussions on this board about using multiple T1's to improve data throughput. If memory serves, there were two possible ways to do this: 1) per packet load sharing and 2) PPP multilink for no particular reason I decided to do a little study on PPP multilink. Well, OK, I do have two particular reasons - an upcoming Lab and a customer who is asking about this. So, I build a scenario as follows: serial0 token ring R6R5---R4 || serial1 to test throughput, I used extended ping, with multiple pings and various size payloads, from a loopback on R4 to a loopback on R6. the routing protocol was EIGRP, done to assure per packet routing between R6 and R5 as a control. My results were interesting, to say the least. unexpected, but so consistent that there is no question, in my mind, anyway, about some of the assumptions many of us make about various load sharing and multiplexing options. a summary of the results are using the Cisco router reporting of min/avg/max round trip times - the middle number is the one to watch. packet size PPP multilinksingle serial link configured as PPP multilink 1000 24/24/13220/20/104 1500 28/29/52 24/27/112 500 16/19/64 12/13/104 6412/14/60 4/7/104 note that in every case, the single link, configured for PPP multilink, is SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the dual link. Interesting. So I constructed some further experiments, using extended ping, multiple packets of variable size - range 64 to 1500: PPP multilinkper packet load share single T1 8/17/136 4/17/136 4/17/144 these figures are from over 15,000 pings per scenario, so it is not a case of random chance here. there is no difference whatsoever between the results of a single serial link, per packet load sharing over two serial links, and PPP multilink. what is most surprising is that a single serial connection proves JUST AS FAST as a dual serial connection. Now what I conclude from this is an opinion that multiple T1's DO NOT really do much for you in terms of more bandwidth. At least for the kinds of data flows I am able to generate in the lab. Furthermore, PPP multilink is actually harmful to throughput. So I gotta ask - is load sharing really adding anything to the mix? Really? In real world scenarios and data flows, where is it that you are gaining anything? Lastly, I set up a final scenario in which I sent 5000 byte packets. this means fragmentation and reassembly would occur, because the MTU on all wan interfaces is 1500 bytes. Here are the results when pinging 5000 times using a 5000 byte payload: single serial link: 64/66/168 per packet load share: 64/64/168 ppp multilink: 48/52/172 note here that the load sharing scenario is slightly faster than the single serial link, and that the ppp multilink is FAR AND AWAY faster that the other two. I suspect the reason for this is efficiencies gained under the multilink scenario when fragmenting and reassembling the oversized payloads In any case, I hope this presentation will lead to some good discussion of bandwidth and results. would it be fair to suggest that peoples' efforts to solve what they perceive as bandwidth issues by implementing multiple WAN links is really a study in fruitless activity? Maybe I should have set up some IPX scenarios? Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21623t=21623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP Multilink studies - interesting results [7:21623]
Hi Very interesting. I would be interested in seeing the CPU load between methods too. I will venture to say that CPU usage of the multilink is the highest. John Hardman CCNP Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A couple of weeks ago there were a couple of discussions on this board about using multiple T1's to improve data throughput. If memory serves, there were two possible ways to do this: 1) per packet load sharing and 2) PPP multilink for no particular reason I decided to do a little study on PPP multilink. Well, OK, I do have two particular reasons - an upcoming Lab and a customer who is asking about this. So, I build a scenario as follows: serial0 token ring R6R5---R4 || serial1 to test throughput, I used extended ping, with multiple pings and various size payloads, from a loopback on R4 to a loopback on R6. the routing protocol was EIGRP, done to assure per packet routing between R6 and R5 as a control. My results were interesting, to say the least. unexpected, but so consistent that there is no question, in my mind, anyway, about some of the assumptions many of us make about various load sharing and multiplexing options. a summary of the results are using the Cisco router reporting of min/avg/max round trip times - the middle number is the one to watch. packet size PPP multilinksingle serial link configured as PPP multilink 1000 24/24/13220/20/104 1500 28/29/52 24/27/112 500 16/19/64 12/13/104 64 12/14/60 4/7/104 note that in every case, the single link, configured for PPP multilink, is SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the dual link. Interesting. So I constructed some further experiments, using extended ping, multiple packets of variable size - range 64 to 1500: PPP multilinkper packet load share single T1 8/17/136 4/17/136 4/17/144 these figures are from over 15,000 pings per scenario, so it is not a case of random chance here. there is no difference whatsoever between the results of a single serial link, per packet load sharing over two serial links, and PPP multilink. what is most surprising is that a single serial connection proves JUST AS FAST as a dual serial connection. Now what I conclude from this is an opinion that multiple T1's DO NOT really do much for you in terms of more bandwidth. At least for the kinds of data flows I am able to generate in the lab. Furthermore, PPP multilink is actually harmful to throughput. So I gotta ask - is load sharing really adding anything to the mix? Really? In real world scenarios and data flows, where is it that you are gaining anything? Lastly, I set up a final scenario in which I sent 5000 byte packets. this means fragmentation and reassembly would occur, because the MTU on all wan interfaces is 1500 bytes. Here are the results when pinging 5000 times using a 5000 byte payload: single serial link: 64/66/168 per packet load share: 64/64/168 ppp multilink: 48/52/172 note here that the load sharing scenario is slightly faster than the single serial link, and that the ppp multilink is FAR AND AWAY faster that the other two. I suspect the reason for this is efficiencies gained under the multilink scenario when fragmenting and reassembling the oversized payloads In any case, I hope this presentation will lead to some good discussion of bandwidth and results. would it be fair to suggest that peoples' efforts to solve what they perceive as bandwidth issues by implementing multiple WAN links is really a study in fruitless activity? Maybe I should have set up some IPX scenarios? Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21624t=21623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TCP H.225 [7:21519]
Patrick, thanks for your help. Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21625t=21519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Is the CCIE really worth it??? [7:3485]
On a whim I took the CCIE written this past Saturday. Didn't pass but I do believe the exam is far to easy. YES, to easy!! I came up a couple answers short but really put no effort into preparing for the exam!! When I lost my job last year due to downsizing I weighed my options; MCSE or CCIE...finished CCNP on April 30th so I guess that tells you my choice... HOWEVER, after getting the CCNP I began doing some job hunting, EVERY potential employer wanted MCSE/MCP and didn't care one way or the other about Cisco certs. I'm 48 yrs. old and really didn't care much about the MCSE because of the perceptions you stated (an MCSE on every corner), however I read several Microsoft books this summer (NT, W2K Pro, Exchange 5.5 2000) but haven't attempted any exams. Anyway back to CCIE, aside from the CCNP studies, which I finished in the spring, I read mostly from the Cisco CD (Internetworking Technology Overview, Case Studies, Design etc) and Lou's Token Ring paper (Thank You Dennis for the TR quizzes) but DID NOT read any of the popular books i.e. Halibi, Caslow, Doyle endorsed here. I didn't read them for a reason and that was to see if I could pass WITHOUT their input and if I hadn't scr*^ewed up a couple security questions I would have passed AND THEN I would really have been PISSEDhaving a qualification to THE LAB and basically only theoretical knowledge base. I chose the CCIE route BECAUSE it was supposed to be the crown jewel of networking!!! my .02 worth Rick In a message dated 10/1/01 12:50:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree with what you are saying, however there is a difference between having to work hard for something, and having it so that there are only 6000 of them in the world... The MCSE has lost respect within the IT industry, however if you want a serious admin job, it is the most sought after certification. The CCIE will always be a well respected certification. The fact that so few people have it is in some ways harmful because human resources departments and managers outside the tech industry haven't always heard of it. I have seen people get interviews for high level network engineering positions that were CCNAs before CCIEs got the interview. This is because HR has heard of the CCNA and doesn't know what a CCIE is... I'm not saying they should water down the test, nor do I believe they are doing so. However, I do believe that more is better to a certain degree. 6000 to 7000 CCIEs in the world is silly. There can very easily be 10 times that and the demand for certified, well trained engineers will still be there ;-) Just my opinion. Regards, -Original Message- From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is the CCIE really worth it??? [3:3485] I disagree. I'm working towards the CCIE, and I want it to be hard. I want to have to work for it. The last CCNP exam I took was the Support/Troubleshooting exam, and I wanted my money back. The couple of hours I put into studying for it were nothing but wasted time. In any line of work, supply and demand rule the market. The more IE's there are out there, the less they'll be making. Not only that, but we lowly CCNP's and CCDP's can probably expect even less. You point out that there are way more doctors, lawyers, etc... well, there's more of a demand for doctors and lawyers. It's a simple comparison: ask yourself how many people in a given population get sick or decide to sue someone, and compare that to the number of people who need a network designed. What's more, the easier any cert exam is to obtain, the worse its reputation becomes; just ask Microsoft. It'll be years before the MCSE is a respected certification again... why? Because it was too easy to get. Everyone's got a story about an MCSE who talked big but couldn't edit an LMHosts file, or couldn't set up a trust relationship, or couldn't install a NIC. If the IE truly does get easier, how long will it be before everyone has a similar story about a CCIE?I for one hope Cisco keeps the lab challenging... I want the IE, but I want to work for it. Hal Logan Network Specialist / Adjunct Faculty Computing and Engineering Technology Manatee Community College -Original Message- From: Marshal Schoener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is the CCIE really worth it??? [3:3485] What is funny is that people are concerned with the possibility of 5 digit amounts of CCIEs at all. Considering there are way more doctors, lawyers, salesman, brokers, etc etc etc etc etc in just about every small city than there are CCIEs world wide, it doesn't seem something very logical to worry about. In fact, to a certain degree it is better off to have more than there are now for
RE: connectivity issue [7:21600]
If I were to take a wild guess, I would say that your 2524 does not have a quad zero default pointing to the PIX inside address. your routing is screwy to begin with. a lot of folks don't like to do it this way, but I would point the default route of all inside devices to the 2524, and have the quad zero default on the 2524 pointing to the inside of the PIX. your router ethernet interface receives all packets, then forwards them accordingly. idle curiosity - why not use your 2610 as your inside router, and the 2524 as the internet router? you can full duplex the 2610 Ethernet and improve performance, especially under this scenario of using the router interface as the default gateway. in general, a good design might be: internetinternet_edge_routerfirewall---switch---inside_routerWAN ---other_nets the way you have things now, you are expecting the PIX to route, and it is not a router. your inside PCs try to get to your WAN, and their default gateway is the PIX, which cannot route. hope this makes sense. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Holloway Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: connectivity issue [7:21600] Guys (and gals), I was wondering if anyone had ran into this problem. I have a private, pt-pt network terminating on my side with a 2524 running 11.1. This is connected into a 2900 switch. My ISP comes in on a 2610 through a PIX running 6.1.(Whose inside IP is the gateway for all PCs) It is also hitting the 2900. My machines behind the firewall can get to the internet and also ping the 2524 Ethernet interface on my side, but that is as far as they will go. I have put a static route into the PIX pointing any traffic for the 10.4.0.0 network (the far side of the pt-pt) directed to the inside IP of the 2524. from the PIX, I can ping the 2524, and any address on the far network. But the PCs cannot go past the Ethernet of the 2524. They can ping the inside interface of the 2524, but not even the WAN interface of this router. I have also added a static for the Network of the WAN link, a /30. I don't understand how the PIX can ping through the 2524 to the remote network and the PCs cannot, when all the routes are in the PIX to direct these packets to the correct destination(2524). Could it have to do with the fact the times I'm getting on those pings( around 600ms) are above the TTL on the PCs or could I be missing something else? This is probably going to turn out to be a stupid question, and I will regret sending it. Be gentle Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21627t=21600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exams sequence [7:21628]
Hi to the group I would ask you to help me to find out if I must pass the CCNP exams in a specific sequence I mean let's say: 640-503,640-504,640-505,640-506. I woullike to start with Switching exam (640-504). Is it possible ? Thanks in advance Cristian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21628t=21628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rate-limit question [7:21630]
how to configure simple access control list based rate-limit ? thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21630t=21630 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP Multilink studies - interesting results [7:21623]
Interesting, as you say. What load were you getting on the links? Your pings are measuring latency, not throughput. If the links weren't heavily loaded, then I can see why you could get these results. Each link is still clocked at T1 speed, so I wouldn't expect adding links to decrease latency. What happens as you approach a T1 volume of traffic? JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/10/2001 02:19 pm - Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PPP Multilink studies - interesting Sent by: results [7:21623] nobody@groups tudy.com 02/10/2001 01:33 pm Please respond to Chuck Larrieu A couple of weeks ago there were a couple of discussions on this board about using multiple T1's to improve data throughput. If memory serves, there were two possible ways to do this: 1) per packet load sharing and 2) PPP multilink for no particular reason I decided to do a little study on PPP multilink. Well, OK, I do have two particular reasons - an upcoming Lab and a customer who is asking about this. So, I build a scenario as follows: serial0 token ring R6R5---R4 || serial1 to test throughput, I used extended ping, with multiple pings and various size payloads, from a loopback on R4 to a loopback on R6. the routing protocol was EIGRP, done to assure per packet routing between R6 and R5 as a control. My results were interesting, to say the least. unexpected, but so consistent that there is no question, in my mind, anyway, about some of the assumptions many of us make about various load sharing and multiplexing options. a summary of the results are using the Cisco router reporting of min/avg/max round trip times - the middle number is the one to watch. packet sizePPP multilinksingle serial link configured as PPP multilink 1000 24/24/13220/20/104 1500 28/29/52 24/27/112 50016/19/64 12/13/104 64 12/14/60 4/7/104 note that in every case, the single link, configured for PPP multilink, is SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the dual link. Interesting. So I constructed some further experiments, using extended ping, multiple packets of variable size - range 64 to 1500: PPP multilinkper packet load share single T1 8/17/136 4/17/136 4/17/144 these figures are from over 15,000 pings per scenario, so it is not a case of random chance here. there is no difference whatsoever between the results of a single serial link, per packet load sharing over two serial links, and PPP multilink. what is most surprising is that a single serial connection proves JUST AS FAST as a dual serial connection. Now what I conclude from this is an opinion that multiple T1's DO NOT really do much for you in terms of more bandwidth. At least for the kinds of data flows I am able to generate in the lab. Furthermore, PPP multilink is actually harmful to throughput. So I gotta ask - is load sharing really adding anything to the mix? Really? In real world scenarios and data flows, where is it that you are gaining anything? Lastly, I set up a final scenario in which I sent 5000 byte packets. this means fragmentation and reassembly would occur, because the MTU on all wan interfaces is 1500 bytes. Here are the results when pinging 5000 times using a 5000 byte payload: single serial link: 64/66/168 per packet load share: 64/64/168 ppp multilink: 48/52/172 note here that the load sharing scenario is slightly faster than the single serial link, and that the ppp multilink is FAR AND AWAY faster that the other two. I suspect the reason for this is efficiencies gained under the multilink scenario when fragmenting and reassembling the oversized payloads In any case, I hope this presentation will lead to some good discussion of bandwidth and results. would it be fair to suggest that peoples' efforts to solve what they perceive as bandwidth issues by implementing multiple WAN links is really a study in fruitless activity? Maybe I should have set up some IPX scenarios? Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21632t=21623
RE: connectivity issue [7:21600]
enable nat for that network nat (inside) 0 0 -Original Message- From: Paul Holloway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: connectivity issue [7:21600] Guys (and gals), I was wondering if anyone had ran into this problem. I have a private, pt-pt network terminating on my side with a 2524 running 11.1. This is connected into a 2900 switch. My ISP comes in on a 2610 through a PIX running 6.1.(Whose inside IP is the gateway for all PCs) It is also hitting the 2900. My machines behind the firewall can get to the internet and also ping the 2524 Ethernet interface on my side, but that is as far as they will go. I have put a static route into the PIX pointing any traffic for the 10.4.0.0 network (the far side of the pt-pt) directed to the inside IP of the 2524. from the PIX, I can ping the 2524, and any address on the far network. But the PCs cannot go past the Ethernet of the 2524. They can ping the inside interface of the 2524, but not even the WAN interface of this router. I have also added a static for the Network of the WAN link, a /30. I don't understand how the PIX can ping through the 2524 to the remote network and the PCs cannot, when all the routes are in the PIX to direct these packets to the correct destination(2524). Could it have to do with the fact the times I'm getting on those pings( around 600ms) are above the TTL on the PCs or could I be missing something else? This is probably going to turn out to be a stupid question, and I will regret sending it. Be gentle Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21631t=21600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCNP Thanks To ALL [7:21634]
I ve completed the CCNP in 2 months i ve started on 31st july and ended on 1st October also i make the ccna exam again (new version) Many thanks to all of you who provide valuable informations and guides Reciepe: 1 month vacation from Office CCNP preparation Library from Cisco Press www.cisco.com Mentors and White papers groupstudy.com and finally the RED BULL (special thanks) www.redbull.com Best Regards Have A Good Day!! ;;; Farhan AhmedR CCA, MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE , CCNP Network Engineer Mideast Data Systems Abu Dhabi Uae. ;;; Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor Endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21634t=21634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CSS1 - Books available (my findings, what are yours...) [7:21635]
I am considering writing a book for the CSS1. Since I've already written the CCIE Security book a lot of the information will be repeated. But, I don't really want to compete with CP for the long term. However, as you stated they are still a ways from having all 4 books done. If I had enough interest I would probably put one out so that people don't have to wait several months. John Kaberna CCIE #7146 NETCG Inc. Cisco Premier Partner www.netcginc.com (415) 750-3800 __ CCIE Security Training www.netcginc.com/training.htm Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... After finishing my CCNP, I am now looking towards CSS1, but I cannot find many books out there. The only ones I have found that are made for the exams are all from Cisco Press, and only one of them are out. Two others are on the way, and the last one is not even on the drawing board yet. I have gathered my discoveries so far on http://www.oledrews.com/css1 - so if you know of a book that I have not listed, please let me know. Also, this list can be used by others going for the CSS1 to get a selection of books available. Another thing, all the exams except for MCNS has the exam number 9E0-57x - but the MCNS has 640-442. Could that mean that it is about to expire, but that Cisco has yet not notified about it? Thanks for any comments to this, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.RouterChief.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21635t=21635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors in CCNP Switching Exam Guide [7:21636]
Hi All, I have found numerous errors in chapter 3 of this book. I am really disappointed as this is from cisco press and i expected a better effort than this from them. Can anyone recommend a more accurate guide? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21636t=21636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is the CCIE really worth it??? [7:3485]
Comments inline: wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When I lost my job last year due to downsizing I weighed my options; MCSE or CCIE...finished CCNP on April 30th so I guess that tells you my choice... HOWEVER, after getting the CCNP I began doing some job hunting, EVERY potential employer wanted MCSE/MCP and didn't care one way or the other about Cisco certs. I'm 48 yrs. old and really didn't care much about the MCSE because of the perceptions you stated (an MCSE on every corner), however I read several Microsoft books this summer (NT, W2K Pro, Exchange 5.5 2000) but haven't attempted any exams. On a whim I took the CCIE written this past Saturday. Didn't pass but I do believe the exam is far to easy. YES, to easy!! I came up a couple answers short but really put no effort into preparing for the exam!! Anyway back to CCIE, aside from the CCNP studies, which I finished in the spring, I read mostly from the Cisco CD (Internetworking Technology Overview, Case Studies, Design etc) and Lou's Token Ring paper (Thank You Dennis for the TR quizzes) but DID NOT read any of the popular books i.e. Halibi, Caslow, Doyle endorsed here. I didn't read them for a reason and that was to see if I could pass WITHOUT their input and if I hadn't scr*^ewed up a couple security questions I would have passed AND THEN I would really have been PISSEDhaving a qualification to THE LAB and basically only theoretical knowledge base. I chose the CCIE route BECAUSE it was supposed to be the crown jewel of networking!!! my .02 worth Rick I'm not sure, but I think that you may have fallen into one of the most common traps in the IT cert world - which is believing that the CCIE written exam is comparable to the lab. I can assure you that the difficulty of the written is perhaps 5% as difficult as the lab exam, and perhaps less than 1%. Simply put, the difference between the written and the lab is like night and day, and anybody who has tried both would agree, I'm sure (does anybody out there who has tried both exams disagree?). About those books that you mentioned - Caslow, Doyle, Halabi, etc. I believe that when people recommended them, they were doing so for the lab exam. I can recall nothing in those books that was useful for the written. But I doubt that there is a single person who has passed the lab lately who has not read them. About your notion that the written is too easy, I agree completely. This has actually been well-known within the CCIE community - that the written exam was simply not getting the job done. Hence, Cisco is now rewriting the written and it is expected that it will be much harder and more representative of what the CCIE program will be all about. You also stated that the Microsoft certs are more useful in getting work than Cisco certs, implying that Microsoft certs are more useful than Cisco certs. I believe that it all comes down to the interactions of supply and demand that determines the value of anything in this world. It is most certainly true that there are more positions available for Microsoft trained people (higher demand), as a typical organization needs many more Microsoft admins than Cisco admins. But that's not the whole side of the story, because you have neglected the supply side of the equation. I would certainly agree that if there were an equal number of Cisco-certified people in the world as there are Microsoft-certified people, than the Microsoft cert would be more valuable. I don't recall the exact numbers, but I do know there this is not the case - there are many many more Microsoft-certified people than there are Cisco people. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. CCIE's tend to have better jobs than MCSE's do, and this is because of the disproportionately low supply of CCIE's vs. the supply of MCSE' that easily compensates for the lower demand. I'll give you an extreme analogy. My favorite spectator sport is NFL football. We all know that star NFL quarterbacks make millions. But is that due to some huge demand for QB's? Not really - there are only 32 NFL teams, so there is a worldwide demand of only 32 starting quarterbacks. So how is it that these guys, especially the stars, can make so much money? Simple - there are at most 50 or maybe 75 people in the world who can be legitimate NFL starting quarterbacks. Of that, maybe only 5-10 of them can legitimately be considered to be star players. The point is even if demand is low for something, the value of that thing can still be high if supply is disproporionately low. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21638t=3485 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about ccie written! [7:21639]
When will the CCIE Written exam 350-001 change into new format? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21639t=21639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TokenRing MAC [7:21640]
From RIF the MSB is RII then make me confused if all the token ring mac addresses are with leading zero? Regards, Fanglo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21640t=21640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security written [7:21641]
Group, Has anyone taken the CCIE Security written exam yet? Failing that is anyone about to take it? Steven Dangerfield CCNP, CCSA, CSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21641t=21641 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
