my VoIP box on ebay
I've never spammed the list before with stuff I am selling but I am quite proud of this 1750 - specifically: 1750-2V, 48 meg of dram, PVDM-4, vic-2fxs, wic-1t, wic-1b-u - VoIP, sync serial, and ISDN all in one neat little package. The only way this could be better is if the 10/100 port on the 17xx would do ISL or 802.1Q - they DON'T - so don't buy it thinking it'll do VLANs along with all the other neat stuff it has installed. http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1218538608 I'd rather see someone on here get it than have it go to some equipment dealer who will part it out. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MC3810 == must have toy!
I got an MC3810 a while ago on a trade and I haven't had much time to mess with it. I couldn't stand the suspense any more so I took it apart this evening just to get an idea of what it can do. The base chassis has a 10 meg ethernet port and two DB60 serial ports just like a 2501. The processor is a 40 MHz risc chip so its on par with the 2610 in terms of performance. It has a single flash slot and a single dram slot. There are some good diagrams of the insides on this link: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/multicon/3810fru.htm The expansion slots are what makes this router so cool - you get a video dialer slot for RS366 which is essentially useless but the other four expansion slots are very interesting. The video dialer slot is next to the power supply, the slot next to the left holds a DSP for voice compression, the next slot can take a variety of Multiflex trunk cards, and the far left two slots can take a DSP and an MFT like the ones on the right or you can install a six port pots card that will do FXO, FXS, or E&M. I already had an MC3810-MFT-T1 I'd gotten with a previous package of Cisco stuff and the MC3810 I bought for $1100 had the same T1 module and the MC3810-VCM6 DSP module. I own an pair of Adtran TSU 600 T1 channel banks with dual FXS ports - I can configure the 3810's T1 port and use a pots phone plugged in to the channel bank to do VoFR, VoATM, and VoIP. I started digging to find out what other goodies you can put in a 3810 and I was amazed to find this gem - the MC3810-MFT-TBS - this card has a T1 MFT port and an ISDN S bus just like the 2503. You can find a full list of parts for the MC3810 here --> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/mc3810.htm At the moment I have in my lab a Cisco 2521, a Cisco 2511, a Cisco 2525 /w ISDN, and this 3810. I am done with CCNP/CCDP and my next step is voice specialization. I think I am going to add another 3810 and make sure it has two MFTs and that one of those MFTs has the ISDN option - that will get me VoFR, VoATM, VoIP, and it'll fill my quote of ISDN boxes for the CCIE lab prep. If you're just getting started on Cisco certs all I can say is KEEP PUSHING. I've been studying for two years and I am amazed at the cool stuff I get to do now that I've got the CCNP/CCDP out of the way. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MC3810 == must have toy!
The MC3810 bug bit me real hard today - I picked up another MC3810, brought it home, and got busy cleaning up the debris from my CCNP/CCDP. At the end of the day I kept a 2511, a 2525 with a sync serial port, a MC3810-V with a T1 port and DSPs, and a MC3810-3V with T1 port. I hung all of the routers in my rack and then I stuck two Adtran TSU 600 channel banks under them. The TSUs are lightly populated - only two FXS ports in each but that is plenty for one person doing VoX experiments. You can see a picture of the current setup here http://members.home.com/puzzled/voicelab.jpg You're right to guess this isn't complete - the 3810-V3 seems to allow VoIP without the hardware DSP module installed but I haven't been able to get it to run yet - I suspect I'll end up with a DSP expansion card before too long. I'm also going to add a T1/ISDN modules to each router. I'll have one port for TDM voice and then I'll hook the second T1 port in each router back to back so I can do VoATM - this is *the* cheapest method to get hands on with that technology. I knew I liked this first 3810 when I brought it home but the T1/ISDN card is the clincher - VoATM and a much needed ISDN port all in one small package. Is anyone else running these things in a lab environment? I'd like to hear what sort of fun others are having with them ... post configs if you've done something interesting. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID passed with 839, CCDP complete, details inside
100 questions, took me 32 of 120 minutes allowed, and I walked out with an 839 and my spiffy new CCDP :-) The exam has the following sections and I've listed my scores 1 Intro to Internetwork Design62% 2 Campus LAN design62% 3 TCP/IP network design88% 4 desktop protocol design80% 5 WAN design 76% 6 SNA design 71% 7 security issues 0% (!)(more on this below) For prep I used the Cisco Press CID book and the boson.com pretest. I spent about a month after completing my CCDP just letting my brain cool off then I crammed for the CID in about two weeks. The BCMSN material does an excellent job of covering the Campus LAN design portion, BSCN takes care of the TCP/IP network design, and BCRAN covers a bit of the WAN design questions. I studied for the CCNP 1.0 track and I took the ACRC exam last spring and missed it by one question. I mostly took it to get that stuff out of my head so I could work on switching and I didn't bother to retest but I feel that working through the Sybex ACRC book and the IPX and Appletalk labs in the CCIE Lab Study Guide really carried me on that portion. The information in the Cisco Press book is NOT I repeat NOT sufficient - you really need ACRC level skills to get by this thing. There are a number of questions on Stratacom stuff in the WAN portion. On pp367 of the Cisco Press CID book you will find this URL http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wanbu/82/switch/sysm/sysmch01.htm Learn all of the magic incantations on this page and you will be protected from the ATM demon during your 640-025 exam :) I am a big fan of mastery rather than rote learning but in this case the boson.com exam proved invaluable - their questions are very, very close to what you'll find on the actual exam and you can practice test your way to a passing grade if you need to do so. As gross and as useless as it is for 92% of the people working on this certification, you *must* know a little bit about SNA. I had done workstation support in a huge SNA shop so it wasn't entirely foreign and a long time ago (5+ years), for reasons I forget, I purchased and read a large portion of Communications for Cooperating Systems - OSI, SNA, and TCP/IP. This book is a psychotic piece of IBM backed propaganda which argues for the subordination of TCP/IP and the OSI model in the perfect (I use the word in the facist sense) SNA world. If you can shield your mind from the IBM borgification procedures its actually not a bad read if you want to get some background on SNA. FWIW it is ISBN 0-201-50775-7 and my copy was 'updated with corrections' in 1992. If you don't have the aforementioned marvelous tome of IBM wisdom the CID book covers a lot of what you need to know. The 0% on security was quite a suprise and I still wonder if it isn't a misprint from the test software based on my final score- I was a script kiddie way back when before there was even a word for it and I am very used to looking at other's stuff with a probing eye. I guess the mindset of those that are trained to defend is a lot different than that of those of us who took the Wyatt Earp route to getting our sherrif's badge. Good luck, good studying, and if you're tired of people 'borrowing' your linux box take a look at www.openbsd.org - its the best script kiddie repellent I've found so far. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WS-F5521 or WS-X5530-E2
They're the same ws-x5530-e1 - has a ws-f5511 or ws-f5520 EARL daughtercard ws-x5530-e2/e2a has a ws-f5521/ws-f5521a netflow feature card ws-x5530-e3/e3a has a ws-f5531/ws-f5531a netflow feature card 2 I don't think this is necessary for the CCIE lab (yet) and its actually pretty trivial to set it up - I had L3 switching running in about two hours starting from scratch at a customer site six months ago ... if you can get some time on any cat 5000 series box you should scoot right through BCMSN. Rick Holden wrote: Could someone please explain to me the difference between these to cards. WS-F5521 and WS-X5530-E2 I looked on Cisco's web site but still can't get a clear picture of what the difference is. They both seem to be supervisor card with NFFC, but the WS-F5521 card is alot less expensive. Why should I by the WS-X5530-E2 when the other is less then half the price. Thanks.
Cisco 100x WILL do OSPF/BGP using IPv6 image
I don't know if anyone else noticed but there *IS* an image for the little Cisco 1000 series boxes that does OSPF and BGP. I am running the old 11.3 based IOS IPv6 beta image and it works great. The 12.0 based IPv6 image, besides being too large to fit on the 2 meg flash you find in the cheapest of 100x routers, corrects this 'deficiency' by only providing rip, igrp, and eigrp. So, you heard it hear first ... now watch the prices on those Cisco 1005 auctions zm on the good news. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPv6 connection offer
I changed jobs a few months back and as part of my new duties I get to learn a lot about IPv6. I have a Cisco 7206 VXR 300 that is dedicated to being an IPv6 access point. The router is part of AS12023 and its connected via ethernet to our border router that peers with UUNet (AS701), Teleglobe (AS6453), and Level3 (AS3356) - it should provide a fast, stable 6bone connection. I will provide to anyone who connects the following: 1. an IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel 2. a /60 of IPv6 addresses that are globally routeable 3. an internal BGP peering session to AS 12023 4. telnet access to the core router to help with troubleshooting 5. my office phone number and my VoIP target + destination code for 0800-1700 tech support The way I am setting this up it should be a good play for intermediate/advanced students who want to hone their BGP skills and learn a little about IPv6. If you're the type that likes book learning before you actually put your hands on something I can recommend IPv6 second edition by Christian Huitema ISBN 0-13-850505-5. I've picked up quite a few IPv6 books and almost all of them I found to be filled with fluff. Huitema's book is a solid read you can place on the shelf between Caslow and Halabi for ongoing reference. Don't I repeat DO NOT reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't exhaustively read groupstudy since there is so much and a lot of it is beginner material. Send any requests to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll be happy to hook you up. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passing BCMSN Monday, sell/trade my Cat 5000
If my boson.com test scores are an indicator I am going to scoot through BCMSN come Monday without a lot of trouble. We're running a variety of cat stuff at work and I no longer feel the need to keep the Cat 5000 I've been using so I am going to offer it for sale/trade. I have the following pieces: Cat 5000 single AC WS-X5006 Supervisor 1 fiber WS-X5213A 12 port 10/100 ethernet blade WS-X5155 ATM multimode fiber LANE blade Olicom Rapidfire OC3 MM card - can be used as a one port ATM switch 6' MM fiber cable I want $4000 cash *or* $3250 cash and something else fun for my lab. I could use a 2514, 2513, a cat 2900-XL with enough flash to run enterprise images, and I'd consider most anything else Cisco oriented as partial trade. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lot of talk about 3548; but is it a VLAN router like the 5000?
As a minimum you need a Supervisor III with a NFFC. The NFFC is a WS-F5521 as opposed to the more expensive NFFC2 WS-F5531/5531A daughtercard. You can use an external router to do the job that the RSM does different environments but you can learn enough to pass using a 2620 as the external RP. There are some differences with ethernet cards as well - WS-X5224 24 port 10/100 blade does not do inline rewrite, WS-X5225 does ... inline rewrite basically transfers the packet rewrite functions of the NFFC/NFFC2 to the level of ASICs in the card. Its not on the test but its a big issue if you're trying to use a 55xx box with its limited backplane. All the 65xx linecards support inline rewrite. I used to work for a reseller that is very active in the education market ... here is some design/pricing wisdom for you. As a base I'd buy a WS-C5505 chassis, a WS-X5530-E2 supervisor, and a WS-X5213A blade. Don't buy a WS-X5213 - won't work in a 55xx chassis even though they physically fit. The chasis is $1950 new in distribution, the 5213A is not more than $1k, and the engine should be not more than $5k. It costs $2100 to upgrade a WS-X5530-E1 to the latest/greatest and those cards can be had for $1500 if you dig ... but keep in mind I am digging, too, and I don't have an approval process to go through when I buy :-) For the RP I'd go with a 2620 if you want something you can put a voice card into later or if you've got an NP-1FE in one of those 4500s you're already set. "Butcher, Matthew" wrote: > I did a search for router capability of the 3548 @ > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/prodlit/3500x_ds.htm > I did not seem like the "VLAN" command set like the 5xxx. > I have worked w/ the 3508g and it is Layer 2. > I have worked w/ the 2948G-L3 w/ IRB BVI Layer 2 routing and Port Channel > routing w/ sub interfaces Layer 3 routing. > I have passed the BCMSN exam but found myself grasping from my experiences > w/ these "poor man" 5xxx and 65xx switches. In my opinion it made the exam > harder; I still got 883. > Anyway now my company has taken an interest in my current lab (13 routers > from 1005 ~ 4500m) but we need a vlan switch. > The best I can think of is a used 5xxx from a reseller w/ a warranty. But > that RSM is $20,000 new. > Any thoughts? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP, NAT, OSPF - real world troubleshooting
I had something kind of ugly happen at work today and I thought I'd share the details. I have two DS1s in our office that leads to our border 7206 which is in a colocated rack. One runs to a 2611, the other to a 2621. I have two Cat 3524s tied together with a copper gigabit link. They have two VLANS - #2 is 10.10.1.0/24 and #5 is xxx.xxx.21.32/27 The 2611 has one interface plugged into VLAN2, the other into VLAN 5, while the 2621 uses an 802.1Q trunk to one switch that carries both VLANs. Both routers back each other up via HSRP - the 2611 is primary for 10.10.1.0/24, the 2621 is primary for xxx.xxx.21.32/27 - thus load balancing the traffic across the two DS1s. Both routers run OSPF. Everything is in area 0 and there are three other sites that are fed from the core 7206 via DS1s. Nothing else was happening at the other sites when my trouble occured. I have a NAT pool on each router. The 2611 was there when I started and it originally had some numbers pulled out of the air with a static route from the 7206 to the particular serial interface so they were reachable. I got tired of wrestling with that config and stole .61 and .62 from xxx.xxx.21.32/27 to use instead. When I brought the 2621 in I created a loopback 1 interface and attached xxx.xxx.21.240/32 to it and used the middle two addresses for the NAT pool. I did this so I could *see* which subnets were used where. Loopback0 on each router is a /32 taken from the top of the xxx.xxx.21.0/24 - the 2611 is xxx.xxx.21.252 and the 2621 is xxx.xxx.21.247 - this is done so we have stable router IDs in OSPF for those of you who haven't read that chapter yet. The interface on the 2611 that carries the public numbers got plugged into a port that was in the wrong vlan. The port was up/down and I didn't notice when I left on Sunday after having just converted from a 100 mbit link to the gigabit connection. This led to a couple of interesting consequences. Both of the routers private addresses were reachable via telnet from the inside and once there I could see everything else in the network but stations on the inside could not reach anything. The DNS server for our network lies on the public segment that was not reachable via the 2611 and the addresses used for NAT came from the downed interface. With the 2611 being the active HSRP interface it couldn't see DNS and it was using numbers from a network that our core router believed to be reachable only through the 2621 ... which was not where the NAT sessions were occuring. I spent two hours digging on VLANs and other stuff before I noticed the interface to the public LAN on the 2611 was up/down. I knew I liked the Loopback interface on the 2621 holding the NAT pool a lot better than stealing from the public segment and I am going to make that my policy now on any router that has to do NAT. I may find a good use for a /31 yet :-) I also screwed up on interface tracking - I tracked the DS1s which was a good thing but in a setup like this I believe the public LAN interface needs to be tracked as well. I don't know if HSRP will let you track multiple interfaces but I am going to find out as soon as I click send for this message. Take heed, your CCIE wannabes, and demonstrate your problem solving skills to the lab examiner instead of while standing in front of twenty grumpy coworkers who want to know why they can't get their email :-( _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCMSN passed with 934, details inside
I took the BCMSN this afternoon and exited the testing center with a very surprising 934. Background: I have a couple of years time in grade with cat 19xx/28xx, about the same more recently with 29xx/35xx, and I once worked for three months on an incredibly psychotic Cat 5500 with 800 MACs in the cam and one subnet(!). I've also done one Cat 5500 + NFFC + RSM layer 3 deploy to an ISP with 40k worth of public IPs being routed through the switch. Study gear: I had two Cat 3524s running enterprise attached to a Cisco 2621 running 802.1Q VLANs in production at work. I had a loaner Cat 5000 with a Sup 1 and a ws-x5213 for the last few weeks of my studies. There was an idle 7206 in a remote facility that I used to brush up on mls rp commands. I did some multicast work with my 25xx collection at home. Study Materials: Didn't refer to Caslow once(!). The Cisco Press BCMSN book (only a few errors) and the official Cisco Press LAN switching were all I used. The LAN switching reference does an excellent job of covering some items that the BCMSN gives what I felt was a lightweight treatment. The boson.com pretests were *excellent* - my only gripe is that what is in boson's stuff is *way* harder than the real thing - I was getting mid 60% on the boson stuff and I thought I'd squeak by the exam ... the 934 was a huge surprise. What to watch for on the exam: I think the BCMSN question base is *very* broad. I've talked to folks that had to examine network sniffer traces and so forth and I saw none of that. The possible broadness being mentioned the details are ... Pound VTP operations into your head and do it twice for that stuff about version numbers. Use the same amount of effort on spanning tree and VLAN configuration issues. MLS is there but if you *understand* the BCMSN chapter on it and then read the Cisco Press LAN Switching you'll be fine. I am amazed at how little there was on multicast - knowing how to convert an IP address to a MAC address covered 50% of what I saw. This makes me think the exam question base is broad because I've talked to others who got a lot of multicast questions. I really got flogged on Cisco product line knowledge. I worked for an equipment dealership and I've troubleshot/tested/sold/refurbed everything Catalyst from 1912s to 65xx series include all of the layer 3 modules and I was streeetccchheddd by what the test wanted to know. I can eyeball a box full of Cat 5500/6500 cards and tell you part numbers and specs on them - I rarely need to refer to the fact Cisco product guide any more - and I was really reaching on some of this stuff. If my experience is represenative you should call 800-553-NETS and order DOC-CISCOCATALOG= and memorize the 55/6500 layer three stuff before approaching the exam. Well, thats all the wisdom I have to offer at the moment ... I am going to go pounce on CIT and see if I can be a CCNP by this time Friday .. I left the easiest exam for last :-) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT passed with 850 & CCNP done, details inside
I passed my BCMSN yesterday with a 934 and as a special present to myself I scheduled the CIT exam early this morning. I did basically zero preparation for the test. I spent the $30 for the boson.com exam for CIT because boson's stuff has been a very reliable indicator of readiness for me. I breezed through the first practice test in about nine minutes with a 70% and figured I was ready to go. I found the following areas covered in the exam 1. structured troubleshooting - collect some facts, try to isolate the problem, then an action plan. They must cover this in a structured fashion in the classes but I've never talked to anyone that has taken the CIT. There was a 'drag the little tabs into the appropriate order' question ... it was common sense. 2. ISDN. backwards and forwards. Caslow is a must read for this and I did all of the labs in the CCIE Lab Study Guide by Hutnik and Saterlee using a real live ISDN line into my house sharing the circuit between two S bus routers using an NT1. 3. frame relay. Once again Caslow and the CCIE Lab Study Guide will get you right through this. 4. IP and IPX behavior. I had a CNA and a lot of time in grade with netware and I've read W Richard Stevens TCP/IP illustrated so I had no trouble with this. 5. VLANs in all their glory. I feel *very* lucky that I scheduled this on top of the BCMSN instead of waiting and reviewing as I usually do. 6. there were a lot of subtle questions about connectionless protocols and troubleshooting in an internetwork that I did not do get. I am going to track that stuff down and read it for my personal satisfaction. I started working on the CCNP stuff diligently around April of this year after passing my CCNA last October and my CCDA in January. So, seven months of hard work, a killer home lab when I worked for Optimum and a not so killer home lab now that I am spending my own money, and maybe 500 hours of study and lab time and I'm now smart enough to accurately assess just how far I have to go for the CCIE :-( I got the boson.com exam for the CID earlier tonight and the results were promising :-) Am I going to be the first to knock off three of these exams in three days? I guess we'll see ... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mo' Better Kitty Rides Again! [7:3093]
I have two Catalyst 2926s that are ebay bound but I don't have time to put the auctions up at the moment so I put them up for a few days so some of you aspiring CCNPs who can't afford these toys get a chance to play. They can be reached at these locations with the userid and password both being 'ebay'. The switches themselves have no passwords for access or enable. 24.3.233.101 2007 24.3.233.101 2008 The switches are cabled back to back to each other via the first ethernet port on their supervisor engines and the unit at port 2007 has its 24th fast ethernet port plugged into my other ethernet stuff. I was in Optimum Data the other day and I saw a Cisco 4700 with a fast ethernet port in it. I am going to visit those guys later today and I'll see if I can borrow that box for a few days so this will be a complete lab. If I do borrow a router it'll be placed at 24.3.233.1001 2006. Play nice! That means no changing the passwords, no access lists so others can't play, no messing with the other stuff thats hooked to my 2511, etc. If you accidentally dork it up send me email at mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I don't read my groupstudy mailbox much any more since I finished my CCNP/CCDP six months ago - this mailbox has 18,000 unread messages in it :-( Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3093&t=3093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scary Kitty Mutation [7:3097]
I was rooting around in the debris field I call my office looking for my digital camera so I could auction those Catalyst 2926s and I came up with a pair of Catalyst 2600s - token ring switches. I got these things thinking they might be like the much feared Catalyst 3900 which has never been sighted anywhere other than a CCIE lab exam, but I don't think its the same thing - these switches drive just about like the old Grand Junction Catalyst 1900 switches. Anyway, there are two of them at these locations without any passwords: 24.3.233.101 2005 24.3.233.101 2006 If one of you scholars can forward me the pinout needed to cross token ring on an RJ45 port I'll whip up a cable for them. If I dig a little more I might find some token ring cables so I can hook a couple of routers up to these things. As always, if you mess it up email me at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so I can fix it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3097&t=3097 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
free online catalyst lab [7:3270]
There was nothing good on TV tonight so I assembled a fairly complete Catalyst lab for people to check out - its available at these addresses 24.3.233.101 2008Catalyst 2926T 24.3.233.101 2007Cisco 4500 /w Fast Ethernet 24.3.233.101 2006Cisco 2610 24.3.233.101 2005Cisco 3810 I'm not going to give my usual full cabling description since anyone far enough along to play with this should understand how Cisco Discovery Protocol works - it is up to you to figure out what connects where. I also set the exec-timeout on the 2511 to five minutes - no more people idling for sixteen hours before I notice and clear the session. As always, play nice, no setting passwords, access lists, etc, so others can't get in, and if you dork it up email me at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so I can make sure its available. We also owe a big thank you to the guys at http://www.optimumdata.com who have kindly loaned us this 4500 with fast ethernet so this is a full lab instead of the catalyst only thing I put up yesterday. I had to move about a dozen new boxed cisco 2610s to get to the shelf where I found this 4500 today and I counted about 75 25xx routers in the same area - I saw a lot of 2514s, 2521s, and I think a few 2523s - they have plenty of good stuff if you're trying to build your lab out.. I believe Michael Beacom ( mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) has been handling education sales since I left Optimum Data - you can reach him via their main number 800-879-8795. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3270&t=3270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Having problem with tftp to flash : URGENT [7:3455]
Your very urgent problem is going to require NEW BOOT ROMS for your 26xx. I have encountered this bug before and there isn't a good way around it if you need to use tftp. I escaped my troubles by borrowing a Cisco 2650 that had newer boot roms and using it to load the flash for my impaired 2621. If you've got the router on contract Cisco will send you new boot roms - I've got to believe if I figured this out many other people have already reported the bug - but if you have no contract you need to pay for one (about $360 US for a 26xx) or borrow a newer router to load the flash. Kiran Kumar M wrote: > Hi, > > I have a router which is having a flash card (8 MB), but not having the > flash memory in it. > > I am trying to upload a flash file from tftp. I am trying to use tftpdnld > command, but it is not taking.. > > Here is the message that I am getting while booting.. > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > device does not contain a valid magic number > boot: cannot open "flash:" > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > device does not contain a valid magic number > boot: cannot open "flash:" > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > rommon> > > Can anyone please give me a solution to solve this problem.. It is very > URGENT.. please help me.. > > Thanks, > Kiran > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3544&t=3455 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Layer 3 Catalyst Lab (Kitty++) [7:6066]
More is never enough. This obvious truth being stated, we'll move on to the details of our latest 'event' :-) Using reverse telnet to 24.3.233.101 with a userid and password of 'ebay' you will find the following toys port 2008Catalyst 5000 /w WS-X5530-E2 NFFC supervisor 3 engine port 2007Cisco 4500 /w fast ethernet (not yet functional, must be made to netboot due to small flash) port 2006Cisco 7206 /w fast ethernet port 2005 Cisco 2501 port 2004Cisco 2501 port 2003Cisco MC3810 port 2002Cat 2912-XL-EN (due in Tuesday) For the moment all of these devices have no passwords beyond the userid ebay/password ebay needed to get past the terminal server HOWEVER the last time I provided a free online lab some buttnozzle, against my explicit instructions, went around and put passwords on every device. I don't mind providing this stuff when its around but this kind of behavior drives me to distraction so there is now a new policy: This stuff will be freely available over the long Memorial Day weekend and you can email myself ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Peter Slow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and we'll patch up anything that goes wrong. Once the weekend is over we're going to lock it down for our personal use HOWEVER we will accept small cash bribes ($10?) via paypal for a day of dedicated access. I think this will keep the lab available, still darned close to free, and save Pete and I a lot of tech support headaches. We owe massive props to: Peter Slow - the world's youngest AND shortest CCNP (17, 5' nothing) - for the loan of the Catalyst and supervisor engine Optimum Data - for the loan of the PA-FE-TX, the WS-X5224 in the Catalyst, and the entire 4500 /w fast ethernet. Dan Jaffe - for the loan of the Cat 2912 You can reach Optimum Data @ 800-879-8795 and I counted maybe 80 - 100 25xx series routers in their warehouse when I was in there a week ago. I think Michael Beacom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is the guy handling education sales now that I am gone. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6066&t=6066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why use GRE Tunnels [7:6155]
I have this configuration in production: branch office lan cisco 2611 Cisco 7206 running BGP Cisco 2611 branch office lan I have a /24 from one of my three BGP peers which is used for most everything in my network and there is a sloppy deploy of RFC1918 private addresses on two branch office segments. I knew I didn't want the 10.x.x.x/8 addresses leaking into my overall routing table and providing access from our colo sites into our corporate network. Our network is a star topology with the 7206 as its core so I could have done some fancy route filtering so only the three routers involved would see the private numbers OR used the VPN capability of the 2611s but I decided not to because: 1. complexity - there are two junior level people who work on our internetwork when I am not around - I judged the GRE tunnel to be much simpler to understand than some route filtering scheme 2. complexity - an IPsec VPN would have accomplished the same thing as the simple GRE tunnel but would have left the junior router gods scratching their heads if it had trouble while I was gone, to say nothing of the encryption tax on the link - there are some activities that light up the T1 for quite a while and a stand alone 26xx processor can't handle a full DS1 worth of encrypted traffic. 3. ease of maintenance - the GRE tunnels are tied to the loopback address on each router and we're running OSPF as our IGP. I make it a habit to tie VoIP, GRE tunnels, etc to the logical loopback - we did have a dual T1 configuration at one branch office for a while and it was nice to be able to change things and not worry about making sure the tunnel stuff was OK - it just automagically came right back in the event of a topology change (yes, I did the HSRP labs on a live network. So shoot me :-)) I've found many other uses for GRE tunnels ever since I discovered them - its so convenient if you're off site and want to do some work - rather than jacking up your access lists you just 'pipe' a little bit of your private address space to where ever you're at and you're working like you're in the office - think telecommuting in this case - pretty easy to move a little bit of 10.x.x.x/8 to my house and work from home when I needed. Yes, its somewhat insecure in that an @home guy could see stuff by snooping the GRE, but it would be darned hard to exploit unless he hijacked my public IPs at home. Rashid Lohiya wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone give me some reasons why anyone would want to or need to use GRE > Tunnels > > Thanks > > Rashid Lohiya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 020 8509 2990 > 07785 362626 > www.pioneer-computers.com > London UK > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6178&t=6155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIP certification - who else is doing it? [7:26605]
After completing my CCNP and CCDP about a year ago I pretty much dropped out of the education scene, sold all of my routers, and got busy with various radio related stuff. Last spring I started a wireless ISP with a couple of other guys. We got it funded about two months ago and I found that I was doing a lot more with Cisco, at least BGP/OSPF/802.1Q/QoS, and I started looking over the certs to see if there was one that mostly matched what I am doing work wise - the CCIP fits me the way the CCIE, with all of its enterprise stuff, never will. I've started slowly rebuilding the lab - a 2621 with voice and ISDN, my trusty old no serial number CiscoPro 2511 that I couldn't bear to sell, a Cat 1924 EN, and a 7204 with four sync serial ports dropped into my lap a couple of weeks ago. I figure I'll be back to 'full strength' before too long - I'll probably sell the 7204 and get something smaller/quieter. I don't see any "Pass the CCIP" books or any CCIP specific tests on boson.com so I started digging into the requirements to see if the CCNP/CCDP stuff might fit. This is what I've found so far: Building Scalable Cisco Internetworks (exam 640-900) is the larger of the two core exams and it appears to be very similar to BSCN with much added from BGP and IS-IS. I'm reading Internet Routing Architectures again and its a lot more fun this time - I have a dual T1 CEF bundle from Sprint, another T1 that terminates at a different Sprint router, and a UUNet T1 that ought to be up in a few weeks - nothing like real world application to get you to open up the book :-) The Multicast + QoS beta exam (exam 641-905) looks like much of the multicasting information from the BCMSN exam and a lot of QoS stuff that isn't covered anywhere else. I'm lucky here, too, lots of QoS stuff I need to do on my growing network. I've had the Cisco Press IOS 12.0 Quality of Service reference book for a while, and I just got Enhanced IP Services for Cisco Networks and the new IP Quality of Service book as well. Hopefully reading this stuff will fill in the blanks ... I looked at the five possible electives - Cable, Content Networking, METRO (optical), Security, and MPLS - MPLS is the only one that doesn't look completely useless for a network of the size I operate. I've been hoping they'll add a wireless specialization which would be very easy for me after the last six months, but MPLS looks like a good second choice - stuff I might be able to use, lab gear is not a fortune, and there are a couple of books out. I bought MPLS and VPN Architectures today. Has anyone on here completed the CCIP yet? Who is actively working on it? I'd love to hear from others doing this - drop me a note at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930 http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26605&t=26605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP questions? Get "Integrating Voice and Data Networks" [7:26637]
Any question you may have about Cisco VoIP is answer in the Cisco Press book: Integrating Voice and Data Networks ISBN1-57870-196-1 Farhang Sharifi wrote: > > Dear all, > Does anybody have info on VoIP using Cisco platform? > I have the following question: > I am using an AS5300 system for VoIP termination for the traffic that is > comming from a carrier, Now I want to add a new carrier so that both can > send traffic simultaniously. I dont know how I sould set up the Cisco and if > I need additional software or hardware. > > Any idea welcome. > > Thank you and best regards > Farhang Sharifi -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930 http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26637&t=26637 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bridging analog phone service with Cisco VoIP
If you just want to 'bridge' analog phone service this is what you need - private line automatic ringdown (plar) means that the connection is established as soon as one end goes off the hook. This is a point to point config ... if you want to get fancier than this you need to create a dial plan. --- router one --- voice-port 1/0/0 connection plar 194 ! ! dial-peer voice 194 voip destination-pattern 194 codec g711ulaw session target ipv4:x.x.x.241 ! ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 167 port 1/0/0 --- router two --- voice-port 1/0/0 connection plar 167 ! dial-peer voice 167 voip destination-pattern 167 codec g711ulaw session target ipv4:x.x.x.245 dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 194 port 1/0/0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi all, > > here's the network layout > > x25 LL > FRx25 > POTS 1 --- 1750 -- 4500 -- 4500 --- 4500 --- 1750 > POTS 2 > > how to setup the router for voice connection from both POTS ? > thank you very much. > > Best Regards, > JC > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did I find a BGP bug?
I am running a 7206VXR for our main BGP box. We're colocated with Level 3 (AS3356) and we have ethernet to them. We have T1s to UUNet (AS701) and Teleglobe (AS6453). I am running OSPF for my IGP and everything seems to be working well there. I have a 7120 in my office that I am using for BGP experiments. Besides what I show below it has a static route 0.0.0.0/0 to the outside world. When I run this config on the 7120 without the filter-list 2 I get a full BGP table viewable via 'show ip bgp' and the routing table gets populated with a bunch of BGP routes. When I turn on that filter-list and do a clear ip bgp from the 7206 and the 7120 I see the message counter going up on the 7120 in 'show ip bgp neighbor' but the BGP table never has anything in it. I chose to filter 3356 since the majority of the entries in the BGP table on the 7206 come from there. It was my plan to trim the BGP entries coming to an internal router down to the point where I could use something smaller/slower (like a 2611 with 64 meg) for BGP experiments and put the 7120 back to work. The 7120 is a bit warped, however, take a look at this evil 'show ver' ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(5r)XE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BOOTFLASH: EGR Software (C7100-P-M), Experimental Version 12.0(2110:181554) [otroan-thanksgiving-rel 196] This is an IPv6 image based on 12.0. This isn't available on the web site yet - I had to display some pretty solid groveling technique to get it and it works fine for IPv6 stuff but its not so nice for IPv4. Is this config valid? I've seen other weirdness with this image related to IPv4 routing behavior besides this BGP stuff and I am really wondering if its just the image and not my lack of skill that is causing these BGP problems. --- this is the 7120's relevant info --- router bgp 12023 no synchronization neighbor 209.58.21.253 remote-as 12023 neighbor 209.58.21.253 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 209.58.21.253 filter-list 2 in no auto-summary ! ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 2 deny ^(_3356) ip as-path access-list 2 permit ^$ --- and this is the 7206 router bgp 12023 no synchronization network 209.58.21.0 neighbor 63.210.10.97 remote-as 3356 neighbor 63.210.10.97 description Level3 Peer neighbor 63.210.10.97 filter-list 1 out neighbor 157.130.20.69 remote-as 701 neighbor 157.130.20.69 description Order Number 17124 neighbor 157.130.20.69 filter-list 10 in neighbor 157.130.20.69 filter-list 1 out neighbor 207.45.199.189 remote-as 6453 neighbor 207.45.199.189 description Teleglobe Peer neighbor 207.45.199.189 filter-list 11 in neighbor 207.45.199.189 filter-list 1 out neighbor 209.58.21.221 remote-as 12023 neighbor 209.58.21.221 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 209.58.21.221 filter-list 2 in no auto-summary ! --- I think this is a 'sink' so that any unallocated stuff from our 209.58.21.0/24 block --- doesn't get looped back to the outside world ... or maybe its here because BGP needs --- IGP reachability before it'll advertise anything. ip route 209.58.21.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 250 ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ ip as-path access-list 2 deny ^$ ip as-path access-list 10 permit ^(_701)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_1239)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_3561)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_2041)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_10753)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_1)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_6453)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_6172)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_3967)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 deny ^(_701)+(_2914)+$ ip as-path access-list 10 permit ^(_701)+_[0-9]+$ ip as-path access-list 11 permit ^(_6453)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_1239)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_3561)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_2041)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_10753)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_1)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_701)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_6172)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_3967)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 deny ^(_6453)+(_2914)+$ ip as-path access-list 11 permit ^(_6453)+_[0-9]+$ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN simulator Adtran Atlas 550 (like the Atlas 800 in CCIE Study Guide)
Don't know if everyone saw this or not ... I recently picked up an evaluation Adtran Atlas 550 with a quad BRI card. This unit has the same interface as the Atlas 800 mentioned in the Hutnik & Satterlee CCIE Study Guide only its smaller - one PRI and 4 BRI instead of the two PRI and eight BRI the 800 has. I played with it a bit, ran it on ebay, and it didn't sell. I think one of those online school places is going to take it but if anyone else is interested I think I can get more. Sorry for the commercial spam but not a lot of people know about this box yet and I think maybe people are paying for Teltone's when they could have a piece that would let them do proper ISDN dial - you really can't experience the full misery ^h^h^h^h^h^h^h joy of ISDN till you have three different routers trying to talk to each other :-) http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=386206664 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bridging analog phone service with Cisco VoIP
The voice over IP depends on the IP portion of the network working - just set up the routers as you normally would and the voice traffic will travel just fine. You do have a potential problem with congestion here, don't you? I am assuming more than one type of data is using the area of the network that has the 4500s in it. This will be a good chance to exercise your cisco skills? Will IP precedence on the 1750s do the job? Do you have to set up the 4500s to handle precedence as well? Perhaps its a job for customer/priority queueing?? You'll have a wonderful learning experience with this ... Janto Cin wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > thanks for the attention, > correction for network layout : > > x25 LLFR x25 > POTS1 1750 4500 4500 4500 1750 POTS2 > > can I configure the voice connection between both POTS but still use x25 for > data ? how to configure the routers ? > thanks. > Janto > > > If you just want to 'bridge' analog phone service this is what you need > > - private line automatic ringdown (plar) means that the connection is > > established as soon as one end goes off the hook. This is a point to > > point config ... if you want to get fancier than this you need to create > > a dial plan. > > > > --- router one --- > > > > voice-port 1/0/0 > > connection plar 194 > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 194 voip > > destination-pattern 194 > > codec g711ulaw > > session target ipv4:x.x.x.241 > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 1 pots > > destination-pattern 167 > > port 1/0/0 > > > > --- router two --- > > voice-port 1/0/0 > > connection plar 167 > > ! > > dial-peer voice 167 voip > > destination-pattern 167 > > codec g711ulaw > > session target ipv4:x.x.x.245 > > > > dial-peer voice 1 pots > > destination-pattern 194 > > port 1/0/0 > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > here's the network layout > > > > > > x25 LL > > > FRx25 > > > POTS 1 --- 1750 -- 4500 -- 4500 --- 4500 --- 1750 > > > POTS 2 > > > > > > how to setup the router for voice connection from both POTS ? > > > thank you very much. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > JC > > > > > > ___ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Best Regards, > Janto Cin > PT Datacomm Diangraha > Phone : 62-21-6303030 (Hunting) > Mobile : 62-812-9102542 > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can two High density Serial ports be tied together? - YES!
Someone wrote to say that you use a null HSSI which is absolutely correct. I'd like to add that the timing setup is tricky - if you just set clock rate you'll see CDP making it from the DCE to the DTE device but you won't be able to establish two way communications. There is also a 'hssi dce' or something like that which must be set. Not all Cisco HSSI ports are the same. I've had an easy time getting this to work with a PA-H or PA-2H and a not so easy time getting it to go with a CX-HIP. rtc wrote: > A HSSI high density serial port is 50 pins and the size of a normal PC > serial connector. > We need a cale that goes [50pinHSSI high density serial port]--- [50pinHSSI > high density serial port] > > Its the only we can tie our 7513 to our other 3 routers because we cant > afford more Ethernet Boards. > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE All-in-one (author: moron or genious?)
It would appear that your contact with the book has so befuddled you that you've forgotten what a paragraph is. You're right that there are some problems with the CCIE Lab Study Guide but its a wonderful tool to have, all in all. I imagine the second version, which I see is out on the shelves at Borders, goes a long way towards correcting the deficiencies. I've used the book, errors and all, and I completed 70+ labs before I went off and started inventing my own stuff. I credit that book with getting me through ACRC and I recommend it to anyone that is working on Cisco certs ... wish I'd had it when I was doing the CCNA. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey Groupies, > Just wanted to bring up a topic that I've been pondering. About a month > ago, me and another member on the list met up and started working on his path > to CCIE, starting with the "CCIE All-In-One Study Guide." Any of you who have > ever used this book have all seen the massive amounts of errors in it, from > picture errors, config errors, and even syntax spelling errors. We are almost > through the whole book and I must say that out of the 80 labs in the book, at > least 75% of them have had AT LEAST a tiny glitch on the authors part. I have > hated this for the time that I've been working in the book, until last night. > Me and the other member were working on one of the BGP labs. First of all, > there was a config missing for one of the routers, and for router D in the > config there wasn't supposed to be a serial address...but of coarse in the > picture there was one. We literally spent about 2 hours on what was supposed > to be a 20 minute lab. I commented this and the other member said "I know, > this is great." That's when I got to thinking. What if this author made all > of these mistakes to teach us troubleshooting. I must admit, I have spent a > lot of time on these labs trying to figure out what's wrong with them after > we use what the author wants, and I even get better from it. On the way home > last night I was thinking that maybe the book was intended to be that way and > all of those errata's are just ruining it because it's letting people not use > their heads. If this is NOT the case and the author didn't intend in making > this book a troubleshooter, then maybe he is a moron. But if he did, indeed, > write this book this way intentionally, then I have to tip my hat and say > that he is a genius and a great teacher. Just my thoughts guys. After all, > the second half of "the lab" is fixing what was made wrong. If this book can > simulate that...then it is the best CCIE study guide to a certain level. Have > a good one group, > > Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a > Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and > explode once a year killing everyone inside. > ~Robert Cringely, InfoWorld~ > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no access to router
Sounds like you have flow control enabled on the PC port you're using to connect to the router. groupstudy wrote: > too bad , i will throw my 2503 out of window ,kiding..,thanks anyway > ElephantChild wrote in message ... > >On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, groupstudy wrote: > > > >>I got a cisco 2503 . I can't get access to the console except that i > can > >> see the information in the terminal window but can't not type .and > >> unfortunately I lost the telnet password and enable password. > > > >Do the same cable and terminal emulator work with other routers? If tey > >do, check that the cable is properly seated and that there isn't dirt in > >the console port on the router. If it still doesn't work, the router > >may be set up for software flow control, or hardware flow control, or > >none at all. Try fiddling with the flow control setup on your terminal > >emulator and see what happens. > > > >If you have a null modem cable, you may also try the aux port. > > > >> my question is whether doing a password recovery to this router without > >> getting access to the console port is possible ?? > > > >No. > > > >-- > >Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience > >true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades. > > > >___ > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--- > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LAT - what unix terminal package to use?
This is somewhat off topic ... I am boning up for BCRAN in a week or two and I am reading the stuff about protocol translation. For those who aren't this far yet protocol translation is used for allowing telnet, x25, and lat sessions to interoperate - LAT is nonrouteable so its handy to be able to tunnel it over TCP/IP. Rather than some boring reading I'd rather just hack on this a bit and maybe get it running in my lab but I can't find a good linux LAT client. Does anyone have a suggestion for what package to use? I do have some FreeBSD boxes available at work as well but I am less familiar with them. Thanks in advance. As an aside, I am relatively old for this certification crowd, I attended a university that had a tight relationship with DEC, and VAX 11/780 S/N 2 (!) lived in my garage for a while as I parted it out after Iowa State decommissioned it. I've never used LAT, I've never run a protocol analyzer on a network with LAT, and I've never talked to anyone that has used it. Does this stuff still exist in production anywhere in the world? And more importantly does it ever turn up in any Cisco exam other than one question on this BCRAN pretest? -- "Just do the steps that you've been shown by everyone you've ever known until the dance becomes your very own" - Jackson Browne ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP - real bandwidth used for G729R8 codec
I have been tinkering with a 2611 and a 2621 with voice gear and I am tearing my hair out. I see the claimed bandwidth is 8k plus 'overhead' which the Cisco documentation seems to not want to cover in detail ... apparently the overhead can be double the size of the data for a total of 24k/conversation using Cisco's best codec. I've been messing with various low bandwidth configurations and I can get a solid conversastion through a 28.8 link. If I use header compression and compress the link itself it'll run through a 14.4k link. I need to do this for two AS5300s fully configured with 120 voice ports in each I understand what RTP header compression does but I can't use it because there are multiple hops involved and not everything is serial links. Can anyone point me to some useable information about tuning this stuff? Cisco's site and Google have proven pretty useless on this topic ... I get the feeling they don't want to talk about it. -- "Just do the steps that you've been shown by everyone you've ever known until the dance becomes your very own" - Jackson Browne ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAC Address support for c1900 series
The little switches have a limited MAC address table. If you know you have a link where they're going to see more MACs than they can hold you set it to be a 'network' port and the switch doesn't learn MACs from there. This is meant for a large campus environment where you have a 19xx serving a workgroup. I've worked on some real cluster (*#&$%s over the years and I've never seen a real world situation where this would be needed. I'd like to hear from anyone else if they've been in some shop of horrors where this configuration was required. Daniel Boutet wrote: > I was looking at the specs and it says that it supports 1024 MAC address. My > understanding is that it is what the CAM table will support at one time. > But the specs also states: > > "Unlimited MAC addresses support on configurable network port" > > This, I don't get. Can anyone explain? > > Thanks > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Just do the steps that you've been shown by everyone you've ever known until the dance becomes your very own" - Jackson Browne **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipv6 tunnels available, leads to all sorts of fun stuff
I've colocated a Cisco 7120 at pensat.com and I am working with an engineer there to get ipv6 tunnels working. I've got half a dozen set up but we need to hit 40+ before they qualify for the next size block of IPv6 numbers. IPv6 is interesting but there are some other goodies that come with this connection as well. We've got the 7120 set up with enough ram to do BGP and we'll be turning that on shortly. I've got a 7505 with enough guts to do that job as well and I am planning on using it to give people hands on in something like a production BGP environment. I think the 7120 will be accessible but only in login and not enable mode. I am also in the process of installing an ISDN dial lab at work that will be accessible only via IPv6. Its got an AS5200, an Adtran TSu 600 for analog calls, an Atlas 800 to do ISDN switching, and some Cisco 1003s as clients. This should be ready within the next month or so. The initial config is not very difficult - you just need a CCO login so you can get the IPv6 software for your router or I can set you up with the 7120 image if that is your platform - its not released for beta yet but a kind Cisco developer 'loaned' me a copy. Once you have your software this is about all you need to get started. ! this is really all that is required besides the single default ipv6 route interface Tunnel95 description ipv6 link to Optimum Data Switching Lab 3ffe:b00:4007:5/64 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127 tunnel source 209.58.21.221 tunnel destination 24.3.235.22 tunnel mode ipv6ip If this is something you are interested in please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipv6 - doesn't have broadcast addresses
IPv6 uses multicasts instead of broadcasts, so unlike ipv4 where a /31 is unuseable the /127 works just fine. I have half a dozen working ipv6 tunnels to prove this :-) Brad Beck wrote: > > Interesting I'm curious how you can have a /127 address, since this > allows you only a network and broadcast, but no host bits > > Am I missing something?? > > -Brad > > Brad Beck, CCNA > WAN Administrator > Diva Systems > > > ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127 > > At 10:06 PM 5/15/00 -0500, neal rauhauser wrote: > > I've colocated a Cisco 7120 at pensat.com and I am working with an > >engineer there to get ipv6 tunnels working. I've got half a dozen set up > >but we need to hit 40+ before they qualify for the next size block of > >IPv6 numbers. > > > > > > IPv6 is interesting but there are some other goodies that come with > >this connection as well. > > > > We've got the 7120 set up with enough ram to do BGP and we'll be > >turning that on shortly. I've got a 7505 with enough guts to do that job > >as well and I am planning on using it to give people hands on in > >something like a production BGP environment. I think the 7120 will be > >accessible but only in login and not enable mode. > > > > I am also in the process of installing an ISDN dial lab at work that > >will be accessible only via IPv6. Its got an AS5200, an Adtran TSu 600 > >for analog calls, an Atlas 800 to do ISDN switching, and some Cisco > >1003s as clients. This should be ready within the next month or so. > > > > The initial config is not very difficult - you just need a CCO login > >so you can get the IPv6 software for your router or I can set you up > >with the 7120 image if that is your platform - its not released for beta > >yet but a kind Cisco developer 'loaned' me a copy. Once you have your > >software this is about all you need to get started. > > > >! this is really all that is required besides the single default ipv6 > >route > >interface Tunnel95 > > description ipv6 link to Optimum Data Switching Lab 3ffe:b00:4007:5/64 > > no ip address > > no ip directed-broadcast > > ipv6 enable > > ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127 > > tunnel source 209.58.21.221 > > tunnel destination 24.3.235.22 > > tunnel mode ipv6ip > > > > If this is something you are interested in please email me at > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >___ > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can anyone help with VoIP config?
I have two VoIP capable routers I've been messing with and I am tearing my hair out. We've made VoIP calls and thats no big deal but we're having trouble with the dial plan - what I want to accomplish is this 402-391-2413 <-> Cisco 1750 /w FXO card <-- IP connection --> Cisco 1750 /w FXS <-> plain ol' phone when a call comes to the PSTN number it should just ring the remote phone and when the remote phone is picked up the user should get the dial tone from 402-391-241. I've looked at dial plan stuff until my eyes cross and I can't figure this out - if anyone has an example config of how to do this I'd be eternally thankful. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does your home lab look like?
While others have a bigger 'spread' in terms of numbers of routers I think I have the most liberal employer in terms of letting me walk out with expensive toys ... specifically at the moment Cisco 1003s Cisco 1750 Cisco 2511 Cisco 2513 Cisco 2516 Cisco 2521 Cisco 2523 Cisco 7120 (deployed at pensat.com for IPv6 fun) Cisco 7505 /w vip2-40 & PA-A1-OC3-MM, CX-FEIP Cat 2820 /w ATM OC3 card Cat 5505 /w Sup3 NFFC2 & WS-X5155 ATM blade Cisco LS100 ATM switch Cisco AS5200 Access Concentrator Adtran TSU 600 (channel bank to provide FXS to DS1 to AS5200) Adtran Atlas 800 (communications widget ... a small ISDN switch for the 1003s) You can see various pictures of my setup at http://www.optimumdata.com/ccielab Louie Belt wrote: > > I'd be interested to see the different configurations / equipment that > exists in everyone's home labs. Perhaps we could even "trade time" between > labs to prevent us from all spending a fortune for lab equipment. > > Anyone want to post a diagram of their home lab config so we can compare > notes and setups? > > Here's mine in its current form (It's still a work in progress - I need > another Router with an ATM Module) > > http://members.home.com/louieb/ciscolab.htm > > Comments, suggestions, thoughts, criticisms all appreciated.. > > I've shown you mine, now show me yours :> > > Louie > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to Back with Internal T1 or 56k CSU/DSU
For T1 make a cable using cat5 and two RJ45 ends - cross pins 1+2 to pins 4+5 and you've got your T1 crossover. For 56k CSU/DSUs cross 1+2 and 7+8 if I remember correctly. Gary Alterson wrote: > Hello all wiser than I: > > If I've got two 2600 series routers, both with the Internal T-1/Frac T-1 > DSU/CSU WIC, what do I need to hook them up to each other back to back? Is > it just a cable? If so, which kind? Also, can I then channelize the full > T-1 to decrease the bandwidth available? > > Do I use a different cable if I need to hook up to 56k DS0 WICs instead? > > Thanks in advance, > Gary > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco NP-1FE and MC3810 $500/ea [7:20574]
I apologize for the commercial spam :-( I've got an NP-1FE and an MC3810 /w 32d/8f - I don't need 'em, they've been hanging around for months, and my last three ebay bidders have not paid. My busy schedule and ebay frustration is your gain - I think $500 is under market for either piece. Both are known working, 90 day guarantee, etc, etc. If you want it the deal is paypal $500 + shipping and it'll go out right away. There is some other misc junk down here but I don't think group studiers would want it - a new AS5300 dual DC power supply, two AS53-VOXD-12, a SM25-BRI-U, a MC3810 T1/E1 card, a lot of cosmetic spares for 7505/7507 chassis, etc. If any of this sounds interesting drop me a note ... be sure to use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - send it to this account and you're entering mailing list purgatory :-) -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930 http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20574&t=20574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Aironet Access points Range [7:23758]
The AP350 is a 100 milliwatts or +20dBm. The 'duck' antenna that ships with the unit has 2.2dBi of gain. The dBi rating indicates gain over an isotropic radiator - a theoretical perfect point radiator in free space. The 2.2 dB of gain indicates that there is a little bit of focusing of the radiated energy towards the horizon when the antenna is mounted vertically. To figure out how far out you can get a signal you'd need to know the receive sensitivity of the client radio in use (-75dBm for 2 meg ... this is the only rule of thumb I carry in my head) and the receive gain of the client antenna. If you're talking to PCMCIA cards they're nasty - essentially no gain. You'd need to figure the loss to find out if the observed signal at the receiver is greater than the receive sensitivty. Examine this URL: http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/ There is a lot of information in here about 2.4 gig radio performance and in particular there are a lot of nice equations that show how to calculate link loss and all sorts of other stuff you need to know. This is a little tense for indoor use - but I've shot Aironet 342 over a 22 mile link :-) IT Guy wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Need to clear an small confusion?? > > As we know Range for 350 AP at 11 mbps is 130 ft??What does it mean?? > 130 ft horizontal or vertical or both??? > > Thanks for removing my confusion. > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930 http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23825&t=23758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - good auction seller [7:24468]
I worked for an aftermarket dealrship (Optimum Data) - Pat McKool has been in the business a long time (ten years? more?) and is very respected. I've done a number of sizeable deals with him and I trust him completely. "Ouellette, Tim" wrote: > > Chuck, > > I too have dealt with Pat McKool. I was also very impressed with the > product/service that I received. In the event that I need to buy more > equipment, I will definetly give Pat a call. > > TIm > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:27 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Off Topic - good auction seller [7:24468] > > > > After some of the recent negative discussion about a particular auction > > seller ( and thanks - it helped me avoid bidding on certain products ) I > > thought some folks might be interested in my recent positive experience. > > > > Pat McKool of Market Network Solutions, was a pleasure to deal with. > > > > If anyone is in the market for used equipment, you might want to keep an > > eye > > out for this guy on That Auction Site. > > > > NOTE: past performance is no guarantee of future results ;-> > > > > Chuck -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930 http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24508&t=24468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: does BCMSN include LANE [7:56051]
I passed BCMSN almost two years ago and there wasn't a lick of LANE in sight. 10/100/1000 ethernet and layer three switching have pretty much slain every lick of ATM/Token Ring out there and Cisco's exams reflect the changes in the market. Today I walked in to a place to do an eval and I found Cabletron ATM+TR ... first time I've seen it in production in at least three years and part of the deal is to yank the stuff out and replace it with ethernet. Aaron Ajello wrote: > > I would trust the cisco web site and go with what it says is featured on the > exam. From what I have seen, what it notes on the web site is accurate to > what is on the test. > I used 504 books to pass the 604 test, so I don't think too much changed. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:neallist@;wispair.net fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56113&t=56051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 26xx image with MPLS support? [7:57299]
I just heard a viscious rumor on the nanog mailing list - there are some images for the 26xx that support MPLS!@!@!@!@! I am mostly done with studies for the BSCI and QoS+Mcast - only barrier to me getting CCIP was getting my sticky little paws on routers that support MPLS - if there is a 26xx image that is decent I have a whole network I can turn to MPLS after I test it on this spare 2620 :-) :-) :-) I would greatly appreciate if someone can name the image that does this - the fellow writing about it said 12.2.(12.6) and I am not sure which image/train he means. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57299&t=57299 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sale or trade - voice tidbits [7:57532]
I pulled a UBR924 and a couple of PVDM-4 voice DSPs for 1750s out of service last week. I am not gonna need this stuff and the guys on isp-equipment don't seem to want it - rather than consign it to ebay I thought I'd mention it here. Cash is good, other Cisco bits I can use are good, and I always like new books for my library ... drop me a note if you're interested in these things. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57532&t=57532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 802.1q trunking [7:57772]
DON'T TRUST THE CODE ON THE 35XX SERIES SWITCHES. Sorry for yelling, but its that important. I've seen repeated situations like this: router switch 1 switch 2 With a daisy chained configuration like this I've seen multiple instances where a vlan that is done correctly on the router won't work on switch 2, even though all the links are set up for trunking. I've tried forcing this situation with allowed vlan configs and so forth, and its just a pain in the you-know-what. It seems less of a hassle with the most recent code, but I never go in and offer a design like that - its just way, way too risky. PA-FE-TX are about $500 on the aftermarket - have them buy you a couple for the 7206, run lines to the switches, and handle each one as an individual connection. Kris Waters wrote: >Everyone, > >Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago >with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons >and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on >a gradual basis. > >My building contains the following equipment: > >7206VXR router that does internal routing. I have one FastEthernet port on >this router. > >One Catalyst 4006 (Sup2, set based code) switch on the third floor. Both >these devices run the latest code. > >The first and second floors have Catalyst 3500 switches with fiber between >floors. A VTP domain is set up between the 3 switches. > >It was suggested to me to put 3 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port on >the router and then trunk them to the switch (or switches). I'm not quite >sure of the best way to go about doing this. I've read numerous tac >articles, but a little more guidance would be greatly appreciated. > >Here is a sample of the code I used on the 7206 to create the subinterfaces: >interface FastEthernet0/0.1 > encapsulation dot1Q 111 > ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >What do I do now? The router is plugged directly into port 4/10 on the 4006. >Do I create a VLAN 111 on the 4006? Any replies can be copies directly to me >at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as to the board. > >TIA >Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57795&t=57772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cat 5000 ram [7:49643]
Steal it out of a 2500 you're not using :-) Its the same stuff. Symon Thurlow wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Anyone have a good source for CAT5K SUP1 Ram? > > Thanks, > > Symon -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49655&t=49643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Please Clarify. [7:49826]
Shravan, I got my CCNP and CCDP 12/2000. I suggest you get the following: Hutnik & Satterlee's Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide - there are 119 hands on labs in this book and you will easily pass the routing and troubleshooting if you do all of them. Andrew Bruce Caslow Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs You must have hands on time with ISDN. There is no way around it. Buy two Cisco 2503s and share a single ISDN line between them if you're poor, get an Adtran Atlas 550 and a couple of ISDN routers if you're rich. You might be able to do this work with a simulator - I worked for a reseller so I had all the equipment I needed. Neal Shravan Bellal wrote: > > Hi All, > > Today only I subscribed to this mail ID. Its so nice to talk with all Cisco > Experts. I started preparing CCNP (2.0) routing exam. I have Cisco CCNP exam > certification Kit. Is this material is sufficient for CCNP Routing exam or > any other good material for this exam. Also please let me know any good > sites for exam preparation (sample test questions). > > I passed CCNA 1.0 in Dec 1999. Is I am eligible to write CCNP 2.0? > > If yes what is the dead line for me to complete CCNP. > > I would be appreciating if any one clarifies my doubts. > > Thanks > > Shravan > > > > ----- > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49906&t=49826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any VoIP compatibility issues between MC38010 & 1750? [7:49968]
I've used 1750 to talk to AS5300, 26xx to talk to AS5300, 26xx to talk to 72xx /w PA-VXC-2TE1, MC3810 to talk to 72xx, etc, etc. The thing to watch is the codec support on the image you're running - 711 is always there, 723 is next most likely, variations of 729 can appear and give you trouble. You can use 'debug voip ccapi inout' but I've never cared for the results - very, very verbose output. Dimitrije wrote: > > Can one run VoIP over a WAN between different router families such as an > MC38010 > and a 1750? Is this a no brainer or are there some subtle issues here that > require awareness? > > Specifically, are there compatibility issues running VoIP between an MC38010 > with an FXO module running IOS 12.1.14 IP Plus, and a 1750 with an FXS module > running 12.1.14 IP Voice Plus? > > thanks > dj -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49968&t=49968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Cisco Aironet 350 Series Bridges Incompatible with 340 [7:50056]
This is not entirely true. I've had 34x bridges talking to 352 bridges in stable configurations for long periods of time. Note that I wouldn't recommend this in the real world ... I got it done by accident one day, not knowing any better. Daniel Cotts wrote: > > FYI I'm resending info provided by a Cisco Channel Partner SE. > > "Cisco Aironet 340 and 350 Series Bridges can be connected to the same LAN > segments, but they cannot communicate > wirelessly. Although you can disable STP on non-root 350 series bridges, 350 > and 340 series bridges are not designed to > interoperate. If you use both 340 and 350 series bridges on your network, > make sure the 340 series bridges have radio bridge > links only to other 340 series bridges, and that 350 series bridges have > radio bridge links only to other 350 series bridges." > > Watch the wrap: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/accsspts/a > p350rn/rn1121.htm#xtocid14 -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50056&t=50056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
horse trade: UBR 924 for wireless stuff? [7:50080]
I've got this UBR924 (ethernet, cable, two FXS voice ports) that I haven't used in a long time. I'm considering ebaying it, but I'd rather get a BR/AP/WGB35x in exchange. Anyone interested? -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50080&t=50080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: aironet wireless lan [7:50153]
What code is on the AP1200? This is par for the course on WGB352, haven't heard of APs doing this yet, but I don't have any 1200s in my network. You might see 11.07 (old), maybe 11.21 would be better since 802.1x is mostly finished in it, I think I saw 11.40 scroll on the screen on the one 1200 I've handled. "neil K." wrote: > > Hi All, > > Recently Installed Aironet 1200 series based wireless LAN,with cisco LEAP > authentication.Now the network works for a couple of days and then doesn't > until I reboot the Access Points or the Cisco 3524-PWR-XL series switch from > which the access points are powered. > Has anybody faced problem like this. > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > Neil -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50219&t=50153 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a thing of beauty (12.2T BGP chaos) [7:50531]
I am getting nipped by this today, and its more than just VPN that is affected. Latest 12.2.8T5, too :-( CSCdw84776 When a customer edge (CE) router advertises a route that contains the provider edge (PE)-CE link, the PE router fails to install this route to the virtual private network routing/forwarding instance (VRF) because the route is already registered in the VRF as a connected route. If the connected route is learned from the redistribution of connected routes to the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) through the external Border Gateway Protocol (eBGP), the BGP on the PE router marks the route with Routing Information Base (RIB) failure and prevents the route from being advertised to other peer internal Border Gateway Protocol (iBGP) PE routers. This behavior causes a loss of connectivity from the local connected route to the remote sites. Workaround: Source the route on the PE router. Do not allow the CE router to advertise the route that connects the PE and the CE routers. This condition does not occur if eBGP is not configured between the CE and PE routers and if a routing protocol such as the VRF, Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), or Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is used. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50531&t=50531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP: RIB-failure [7:50593]
What is the RIB-failure listed as a Status below? This was taken from a router that runs one EBGP and two IBGP sessions. Some of the internal routes come from two IBGP peers. The IBGP peers are pretty near identical in config, each presenting a single /24, one makes it, the other fails. By failure I mean the route shows up with a leading 'r' and it doesn't get presented to the EBGP peer, thusly the block doesn't make it to global BGP table. I'd be perfectly happy if someone could define RIB-failure for me ... cisco.com is strangely quiet on the topic. BGP table version is 94, local router ID is 63.170.237.254 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 12.36.200.0/23 12.22.183.1930 0 20333 i *> 12.36.210.0/23 12.22.183.1930 0 20333 i *> 12.108.204.0/22 12.22.183.1930 0 20333 i *> 12.108.206.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 12.108.207.0/24 12.108.207.150 20 32768 i * i 63.170.238.254 0100 0 i *> 63.170.237.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i * i63.170.238.0/24 63.170.238.254 0100 0 i *> 12.108.207.150 20 32768 i *>i63.170.239.0/24 63.170.239.254 0100 0 i -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50593&t=50593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pix logging to a Freebsd syslog server [7:51124]
The Cisco logging facility on a router uses a random high port as the source for the syslog packets. I assume the PIX is the same since you're having trouble. The FreeBSD syslogd expects the packets to be sourced from port 514. You can try the flag that supposedly allows syslogd to take random source ports, but it doesn't work :-( I'd strongly suggest you do what I did - just modify the syslogd source so it doesn't check source port, compile it, then install. If that is beyond your C programming skills drop me a note and I can email you the bungholed syslogd.c file and you can take it from there. Elijah Savage III wrote: > > Can anyone help me out with a PIX logging to a Freebsd syslog server. I > thought I was sure about setting this up but I am not getting any > messages on the server, see my configs below. > > logging on > > logging timestamp > > logging trap debugging > > logging facility 23 > > logging host inside 192.168.11.4 > > FreeBSD > > local7.debug/var/log/cisco.all > > I also startes syslogd with these parameters > > 29612 ?? Ss 0:00.03 syslogd -a 192.168.11.2/255.255.255.0 -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51131&t=51124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
break via reverse telnet [7:51192]
How do I send a break via reverse telnet? I've never figured this one out and I've got a situation now were this would be really handy to do. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51192&t=51192 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scariest IOS image name [7:51251]
Yes, this is a real image that I downloaded for real work - can anyone top it? c1700-bk8no3r2sy7-mz.122-8.T5.bin -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51251&t=51251 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIB Failure in BGP table ? [7:51720]
Which IOS image are you running? This is very likely a bug - how are the routers learned via IGP? Try setting the distance on the learned routes to 201 and see if that doesn't clear the problem. shiju joseph wrote: > > Hi, > > Whille playing with BGP synchronization, I am > seeing one route learned from iBGP to get marked as > "r>i150.0.0.0/24". Any idea what is causing this ? > > R1 R2 R3 R4 > Route is synchronized. > > === > BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 101.0.0.1 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal, > r RIB-failure > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path > *> 140.0.0.0100.5.0.20 0 200 i > r>i150.0.1.0/24 100.6.0.20100 0 300 i > === > > Thanks > Joseph > > ---- > Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com > The most personalized portal on the Web! -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51735&t=51720 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becoming a CCSI? [7:52437]
I just got back in town after a week on the road delivering BCRAN - my first time teaching. The venue was not a Cisco learning partner, no official materials, etc, etc, but I think there is a lot of promise in expanding the business and I'd like to do it up right. Cisco's web site is strangely quiet on the topic - I did find this one URL below with google - can anyone initiate me into the mysteries of CCSI? How much does it cost for the test? What are the requirements for a 'learning partner'??? http://64.139.25.96/Internal/CCSICert.htm Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52437&t=52437 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP verification(long)(real world)(access available) [7:52500]
xpect but I've been wrestling with this for a while and I can't figure out how to confirm operation without involving someone else. I've also poked around in RADB.NET and I see that Level3 has kindly proxy registered my subnets and AS20333's subnets since I haven't taken the time to get AS20333/AS25943 a proper RADB login. This is the best proof I have that the config is working globally. So, there it is in a rather large nutshell - my first carrier BGP job and I feeling a bit overwhelmed by the whole business - anyone got any helpful suggestions? -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52500&t=52500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP verification(long)(real world)(access available) [7:52507]
This is part of the problem - no entries in radb.net except for the proxy stuff done by Level3 to help 'those crazy Sprint folks'. I tried to get RAToolset running on fbsd4.0 and failed miserably. Maybe it'll be more fun with 4.6-stable. Thanks for the tip ... "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > Sorry for weird formatting if any...Comcast (my connectivity provider)'s > SMTP > servers have been down for over 48 hours, and I'm having to go through a web > interface to mail. > > As a start on nondestructive testing, consider the RAtoolset. PRtraceroute, > which compares a traceroute with IRR policy, is a good start. It's freeware, > but you need to compile the C++ on a UNIX box. There may be some looking > glasses that make it available -- I'd hunt around at ISI.edu and merit.edu > as a > start. > > http://www.isi.edu/ra/RAToolSet -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52507&t=52507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP verification(long)(real world)(access available) [7:52540]
Peter, Your response was dead on for what I need - comments inline. > > To begin with, keep in mind that bgp routers only reflect best > paths. Hence, all your prepend stuff will generally not be visible on This had escaped me - I never noticed it working from a single AS perspective, even though its in Halabi - something I found in that book only after I'd been bitten by it. > distant route servers which should only see the optimal paths. If you are > doing primary/secondary type prepending, you'll only see the primary in > most cases (except those where a looking glass happens to be far enough > away from one side that the primary and secondary end up with equal length > as-paths and the route server posts both). This explains why I only see a couple of prepend paths in an entire show ip bgp from a major carrier - just a few of them getting lucky and being the same length. > > Anyway, the short answer is that it is tough to see prepended announcements > beyond looking at your rib outs. It is further tougher to see what gets > prepended as cisco has this nasty habit of showing you a pre policy rib-out > (via show ip bgp neigh x/x advertised-routes) This (show ip bg ne advertised-routes) is also something I had never used - I just always trusted the route servers for that sort of information. Makes things much clearer. > > Route server wise, route-server.ip.att.net I'm sure you've found. 701 does > not maintain one and I am pretty sure sprint doesn't either. It would be > really nice if they did :) Lost of ppl have told them this. I found 7018's route server, Sprint and UUNet must be pestered each time you want to know what is going on inside them, and another fellow from this list told me about this thing - its *very* handy - kind of like what AT&T provides only with views to a large (100+) number of ASes. --- IMPORTANT --- telnet route-views.oregon-ix.net --- IMPORTANT --- > > Troubleshooting wise, I have been bitten by ATT's policy of matching > distribute-lists in's (routes accepted via whatever cisco means they chose) > with ip access-group ins. In some cases, they'll take the route, but not > the traffic. This can be a major pain to find until you get used to their > doing that (source verification for dos/ddos prevention) I found this one early on in the game. I love how accessible their tech support is, too - I have enable on one of their peers, the peer has me entered as an official maintainer, and they're still nearly useless. I must say that they don't suck as badly as XO/Concentric's support, but its close. > > Solution wise, I would tend to be destructive during a maint window to > ensure that both control and forwarding work, and beyond that, ping your > transit providers for shots of their rib-in from you, along with a shot of > your routes as they see them. You likely did this already and are troubled > that you read this much only to find out that you did it all already :) I am thinking a spare Cisco 1750 somewhere on net, peered with both ASes using ebgp multihop and a private AS might just be a good solution - apply same policies to it that I apply at the borders of the other networks and see what comes from it. > > At 12:17 AM 9/2/2002 +, Neal Rauhauser wrote: > >I'll start this out by saying that I'm frustrated enough with the > >final verification of this thing to publish the running configs of all > >relevant routers, provide shell access to production boxes, and to set > >up an open 48 meg 1750 inside AS 25943 with IBGP sessions to all routers > >involved. I *think* its running as intended - I'm having trouble with > >verification of my policies - this is my first 'carrier class' network. > > > > BGP layout is like so - I own 25943 and I have admin control of the > >20333 routers: > > > >AS701AS20333AS25943AS25943AS25943AS1239 > >AS7018--^ > > > > > > AS20333 (Exanium) gets service from AT&T(AS7018) and UUNet(AS701) on a > >128 meg Cisco box taking full routes. The AS25943/AS1239 connecting > >point is also a 128 meg box taking full routes. The internal routers in > >AS25943 are all 64 meg 26xx, including the machine at the > >AS20333/AS25943 peering point. The diagram is somewhat simplified - I > >show one purely internal AS25943 router when there are actually two now > >and another two being commissioned within the next thirty days. These > >other boxes are actually leaf nodes from the internal AS25943 box > >pictured - it sits at the center of a star topology. > > > > Geographically it is somewhat complex also - the AS20333 router and > >its AS25943 peer are within 12'
which image for IS-IS? [7:52560]
I just did a quick look around my network and 'clns routing' doesn't seem to work on any of the routers (16xx, 17xx, 26xx) I have in operation. Is there a particular image train one needs to run or some trick to getting ISIS working? -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52560&t=52560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wanted: old school IPv6 beta images [7:52561]
There are some old IPv6 beta images running around out there that have crazy stuff like OSPF/BGP in the image for the Cisco 1000 series routers - anyone got this stuff lying around? I just dusted off a 1003 and I'd like it to do more than just access duty in the lab. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52561&t=52561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSCI - are boson.com exams good? [7:52574]
I used nothing but Boson.com exams when I was getting my CCNP two years ago. Now I have started to work on the BSCI exam towards my CCIP and I don't see a lot different in the BSCI pretest from what was needed for BSCN. Can someone who has passed the BSCI comment on this? I've studied less than twenty hours in the last month, after two years of ignoring all BSCI issues except BGP/OSPF which I use for work, and I'm surprised that these tests are telling me I'm nearly ready to go. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52574&t=52574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCMSN study material [7:52501]
I finished BCMSN 12/2000 and I used almost nothing but the Cisco Press BCMSN book. I did have hands on with cat1900/2900/5500 in large operations though, but only L2 features in 5500. I found the Boson exams to be an excellent gauge of my readiness - http://www.boson.com puro prasad wrote: > > Hi, > I am using cisco press BCMSN coursebook authored by Karen Webb. how good is > this book? do i need to go for anything else other than this one so as to > get through the switching exam? > > Also I would like to know about any WAN switching exams (IGX platform) > offered by cisco currently. > > Thanx -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52503&t=52501 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help needed on Cisco MC3810 [7:52657]
Its like a 2501 in terms of interfaces for the base chassis, so if its cheap, go for it. I can do VoIP, VoFR, etc, if it has DSPs and voice interface cards in it. They're cool. Take it! H wrote: > > Hello, > > Does anyone had any experience on Cisco MC3810? Is it useful for CCIE lab > preparation?? The reason I am asking is because someone offered me a 2nd > hand MC3810, but I just wasn't sure whether I will need it or not. > > Any help or comments would be greatly appreciated. > > Best Regards, > H. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52661&t=52657 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1601 R AUI & Ethernet ports ... [7:52820]
Its there to allow you to feed the unit with fiber, or to place it on an old thicknet run, or some other location where you had a 25xx /w transceiver. If you want dual ethernet you buy a 1605, if you just need two ethernet ports you can place two 1601s back to back with a crossover cable and get the job done. If you're not worried about speed you can use a rollover RJ45 and connect AUX ports and run PPP ... but there are no aux on 16xx. Paul wrote: > > Hi Quick question to you all > > I have a 1601, with 1 serial interface, 1 ethernet interface, 1 console > port, 1 AUI interface. I also have a transceiver. Is there anyway that I can > create a secone 'ethernet interface' by utilising either the AUI or the > console port > > I have looked on the cisco website and also books that I have ... But I > cannot find any documentation anywhere If I can't use the AUI port as > another ethernet port .. then what is the purpose of this interface > > Regards > > Paul ... -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52824&t=52820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on a tunnel between ethernet interfaces and I am having trouble. This config seems close but I don't know what to do next Here is the error I am getting when I try to ping the opposite end of the tunnel 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE... 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: retransmit phase 1 01:05:29: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.168.6.50 (I) MM_NO_STATE. -- this router is at the bottom of a three router stack crypto isakmp policy 1 authentication pre-share crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.51 ! ! crypto ipsec transform-set MIDDLE ah-sha-hmac esp-des ! crypto key pubkey-chain rsa named-key middle key-string 305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF 26BC7013 448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 12EEA345 8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 quit addressed-key 192.168.6.51 address 192.168.6.51 key-string 305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF 26BC7013 448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 12EEA345 8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 quit ! crypto map MIDDLE2 local-address Tunnel0 crypto map MIDDLE2 10 ipsec-isakmp set peer 192.168.6.51 set transform-set MIDDLE match address middle interface Tunnel0 ip address 192.168.6.50 255.255.255.0 tunnel source 192.168.1.50 tunnel destination 192.168.1.51 tunnel mode ipip crypto map MIDDLE2 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 192.168.1.50 255.255.255.0 speed auto --- this router is in the middle of a three router stack crypto isakmp policy 1 authentication pre-share crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.50 ! ! crypto ipsec transform-set BOTTOM ah-sha-hmac esp-des ! crypto key pubkey-chain rsa named-key bottom key-string 305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA 8C44F60C 76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 338E77AE F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 quit addressed-key 192.168.1.50 address 192.168.1.50 key-string 305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA 8C44F60C 76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 338E77AE F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 quit ! crypto map BOTTOM2 local-address Tunnel0 crypto map BOTTOM2 10 ipsec-isakmp set peer 192.168.6.50 set transform-set BOTTOM match address bottom interface Tunnel0 ip address 192.168.6.51 255.255.255.0 tunnel source 192.168.1.51 tunnel destination 192.168.1.50 tunnel mode ipip crypto map BOTTOM2 ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 clockrate 100 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 192.168.1.51 255.255.255.0 speed auto -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52865&t=52865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
Since I want the crypto to flow over a tunnel that is where I placed the crypto maps. I realize that Fa0 on these two machines is the same subnet, but it won't be when I place one of them in Omaha and the other in Houston - hence the tunnel structure. I found the IPsec stuff in the Hutnik & Satterlee CCIE Lab Study Guide(cool book!) after I learned to do it the hard way - my config appears correct but doesn't work. I removed the startup-config and I'm going to go at it from scratch later today. Nigel Taylor wrote: > > Neal, > I you'll also need to have the crypto maps added to the physical > interface through which the tunnels are built. Paste a copy of the complete > configs without the debug output. However, what I noted seems to be the > only thing that stands out! Watch the word wrap... > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur > _c/scprt4/scipsec.htm#xtocid2141729 > > HTH > Nigel > > - Original Message - > From: "Neal Rauhauser" > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:41 PM > Subject: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865] > > > I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on > > a tunnel between ethernet interfaces and I am having trouble. This > > config seems close but I don't know what to do next > > > > > > Here is the error I am getting when I try to ping the opposite end of > > the tunnel > > > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE... > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: retransmit > > phase 1 > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.168.6.50 (I) MM_NO_STATE. > > > > -- this router is at the bottom of a three router stack > > crypto isakmp policy 1 > > authentication pre-share > > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.51 > > ! > > ! > > crypto ipsec transform-set MIDDLE ah-sha-hmac esp-des > > ! > > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > > named-key middle > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > > 26BC7013 > >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > > 12EEA345 > >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > > quit > > addressed-key 192.168.6.51 > > address 192.168.6.51 > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > > 26BC7013 > >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > > 12EEA345 > >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > > quit > > ! > > crypto map MIDDLE2 local-address Tunnel0 > > crypto map MIDDLE2 10 ipsec-isakmp > > set peer 192.168.6.51 > > set transform-set MIDDLE > > match address middle > > > > interface Tunnel0 > > ip address 192.168.6.50 255.255.255.0 > > tunnel source 192.168.1.50 > > tunnel destination 192.168.1.51 > > tunnel mode ipip > > crypto map MIDDLE2 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0 > > ip address 192.168.1.50 255.255.255.0 > > speed auto > > > > > > --- this router is in the middle of a three router stack > > > > crypto isakmp policy 1 > > authentication pre-share > > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.50 > > ! > > ! > > crypto ipsec transform-set BOTTOM ah-sha-hmac esp-des > > ! > > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > > named-key bottom > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > > 8C44F60C > >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > > 338E77AE > >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > > quit > > addressed-key 192.168.1.50 > > address 192.168.1.50 > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > > 8C44F60C > >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > > 338E77AE > >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > > quit > > ! > > crypto map BOTTOM2 local-address Tunnel0 > > crypto map BOTTOM2 10 ipsec-isakmp > > set peer 192.168.6.50 > > set transform-set BOTTOM > > match address bottom > > interface Tunnel0 > > ip address 192.168.6.51 255.255.255.0 > > tunnel source 192.168.1.51 > > tunnel destination 192.168.1.50 > > tunnel mode ipip > > crypto map BOTTOM2 > > ! > > interface Serial0 > &g
Re: Cisco Serials and Theft [7:53574]
Let me firmly advise you against talking to Cisco about stolen equipment. There is a huge theft ring operating in the Bay area right now - mostly they defraud honest broker/dealers with dumpster grade gear but they have previously been involved in a variety of corruption - drugs for hot equipment from janitorial staff, cash under the table to Cisco employees at the Brennan(sp?) facility, faulty unserialized gear leaking from destruction facilties, and big time freight theft - 53' trailers & associated semis just vanishing from Cisco storage lots. There was a $5 * MEG freight theft from Netro last year which led to the breakup of the Roohparvar brothers money laundering operation in San Jose and a variety of other scumbags going on extended state sponsored vacations. I see the names Buompenserio, Bochinni, etc on the detailed criminal complaint in connection with the Netro freight theft and freight capers are usually mafia territory ... I advise you to *not* talk to Cisco because I made this mistake in 1999 after purchashing a piece of equipment from one of the little weasels out there. I called the FBI on them after a $9700 loss but I contacted the authorities three days after they'd nabbed the guy responsible for one of the semi thefts. I knew I wasn't getting my money back but I'd hoped to at least see the perp punished - instead I got implicated in their shenanigans. If your source isn't in the Bay area itself, and the prices are near what is being charged on ebay, and you know they guy, you're probably OK. If you want to talk in private that is cool also - I'll share names of known losers you should avoid :-) John Wright wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Just found this group and it looks like a great resource for Cisco > certification misc. questions. I'm CCNP and have passed CCIE written. > > My question is this: an aquaintance has offered me some really good > equipment that I could really use to study for the CCIE, at really low prices. > > I don't know the guy very well, he seems legit, but is there any way to > check the serials on the equipment to see if its stolen? I don't want to > possess stolen equipment, and I definitely don't want to find that out > when/if I sell it after I pass the Lab. Thanks for any and all advice-- > > John -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53633&t=53574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would you attend a two day basics class? [7:54631]
Would you guys attend a two day, hands on basics class for Cisco routers? I own an internet provider and starting tomorrow morning I am teaching a two day class for our installers and one enterprise customer. Topics covered would be more productivity focused than theory - ie these are the top ten things you'll have to do on basic installs and we're going to touch each one from the customer and provider side so you guys understand what you're doing. This first thing kind of sprung up under my feet due to the enterprise customer wanting to get comfortable with their new four location VPN and the rest are tagging along - I am wondering if this is something I could put a little polish to and then offer to the masses. We're charging the attendees $500 for the two days - do you guys think something like this would fly as a regular offering via a community college, local computer store, etc??? -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54631&t=54631 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Help [7:54623]
Get the Caslow CCIE book and the Hutnik & Satterlee CCIE Lab Study Guide (119 hands on labs) as a minimum. The McGraw Hill Cisco Access Lists Field Guide is pretty good, you need the official Cisco Press BCMSN book for switching, the BCRAN book has some fluff but it does parallel the exam pretty closely. I used the http://www.boson.com exams for prep and I found them to be dead on for all four exams. To handle 75% of the Hutnik & Satterlee labs you'll need a router with four serial ports to serve as a frame relay switch, two other routers with at least one serial port, and some sort of ISDN access. If you can roll the fourth router I think it covers all the lab bases. ISDN is the big trick for CCNP if you don't have hands on with it - try and get a single line for home and share the spids between two 2503s using an NT1 - much cheaper to pay six months of ISDN service than to find a teltone or adtran box for ISDN emulation. Dave Bradshaw wrote: > > I am about to embark on my CCNP training, I would be very grateful for any > advice as how to go about getting this Cert. At present I am gathering lab > equipment for home use, does anyone have any suggestions as to what equipment > I should get? i.e. what is essential & what is nice to have! Also if anyone > can recommend any good study guides, or places to look for relevant > information, (obviously I've found one good place :-) ). I think it may be > worth mentioning I don't presently work in a Networking environment, I am an > Engineer on Networked peripherals, which is what has got me interested in > this > field in the first place. I passed my CCNA earlier this year. Any advice most > gratefully accepted. > > Dave -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54630&t=54623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NM-1CT1 or WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:74741]
The WIC-1DSU-T1 is a service module - it always appear as serial0/0 or whatever, and if you do anything with timeslots you are just adjusting the number used for this one serial interface. The NM-1CT1 is a channelized T1 interface. You must configure one or more channels in a channel group, then they get assigned to a virtual serial interface. In the bad old days before frame relay people used to get 56k leased lines for remote offices and aggregate them all by having a channelized T1 delivered with each DS0 being a separate circuit to a remote. One additional use for the channelized interfaces that I am aware of is attachment to digital modem modules like the NM-xxDM. There may be others, but that is the one that comes to mind first. If you don't know why you might want an NM-1CT1, you need a WIC-1DSU-T1 :-) neil K wrote: > > Can somebody explain when I can use WIC-1DSU-T1 over NM-1CT1 or what exactly > are the difference except that WIC-1DSU-T1 has a built-in DSU/CSU where as > NM-1CT1 is a T1 Module. > > Thanks in advance. > > neil > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74750&t=74741 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
3640 Router E3 support (maybe) [7:74800]
You can install an NM-HSSI and an external E3 CSU/DSU or use an internal NM-1TE3 to terminate a clear channel link. Cisco also built an NM-1A-E3 ATM card as well. In the US the DS3 counterpart to this card was typically used for DSL providers, while the clear channel card or HSSI + external CSU/DSU was used for internet connectivity. So the machine can physically terminate the link and it can stand a full circuit worth of traffic, but if you're considering running BGP *BE CAREFUL*. A little while ago I was working on a 128 meg Cisco 7206 connected to Sprint via a DS3. IOS grabbed 16 meg for packet buffer in the presence of the high speed interface and the 122k BGP routes from Sprint were too much for the remaining memory. A Cisco 2650 with 128 meg can still take full routes from Sprint because it has much less buffer space allocated, but in general I'm treating 128 meg boxes as ticking bombs if they're connected to Tier 1 providers - its just a matter of time - maybe this time next year - before they just stop working due to memory issues. Cappuccio Victor wrote: > > Hello people > > I what to know if a Cisco 3640 Router can support a E3 connection ?? > > Regards > Victor. > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74800&t=74800 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: OT: Cable Lengths [7:74776]
I've seen situations where the legal length has been nearly doubled on full duplex connections without much apparent trouble. I don't know if I'd trust a Windoze box in this kind of configuration, but routers, unix hosts, etc, don't seem to mind too much. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I have a question regarding the max length for a 100BaseT cable. Granted I > haven't done a wealth of research on this so feel free to point me to > google if the answer is mind numbingly simple, which it probably is > > I have always understood the 100M limitation on 10BaseT ethernet cable to > be attributable to the time it would take a collision signal - assuming you > are running at half duplex - to be returned in time to prevent the next > packet from being sent. In other words any longer than 100M and the sending > station would not get the message in time that there had been a collision > and thus continue sending packets instead of backing off. I have heard > attenuation mentioned, but not as the "real" reason for the distance limit. > > My question is given that many stations are running 100 full duplex these > days - thus removing the collision concerns - does this effectively change > the maximum distance for cable runs? Or is attenuation truly a factor in > anything over 100M? > > In general I am referring to standard Cat5 cabling > > Just curious... > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74799&t=74776 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: OT: Cable Lengths [7:74776]
Windows *sucks*. I've seen it act stupid in lots of situations where a FreeBSD laptop with the exact same configuration works just fine. I don't have a technical explanation - I'm attributing it to excessive bad karma. Dom wrote: > > >>I've seen situations where the legal length has been nearly doubled on > full duplex connections without much apparent > >>trouble. I don't know if I'd trust a Windoze box in this kind of > configuration, but routers, unix hosts, etc, don't seem > >>to mind too much. > > What is the difference between a Windoze box with a PCI card in it, a > Solaris Box with the same PCI card in it or even a router with the same > card in it? It all goes up the stack and if the drivers are OK it all > works fine. > > Best regards, > > Dom Stocqueler > SysDom Technologies > Visit our website - www.sysdom.org -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74837&t=74776 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: backup interface [7:74836]
I think there are some implications with the ISDN interface being in backup mode - like IOS idling the interface. You could just use a floating static route to dodge that issue - works as long as you don't mind the ISDN not being tied to the serial interface and the effect should be the same - works whether you're looking for dial backup or you can leave ISDN up all the time. kaiser anwar wrote: > > Hi, >I am having issue with backup interface with isdn. I can ping >my directly connected bri interface. but as soos as I hit my >serial backup interface bri 0/0. Bri goes down. i do show isdn >staus it says layer one deactived. this what it shows for sh ip int > > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status > Protocol > Ethernet0/0unassigned YES NVRAM up > up > Ethernet0/0.4 130.4.34.3 YES NVRAM up > up > Ethernet0/0.6 130.4.36.3 YES NVRAM up > up > BRI0/0 130.4.113.3 YES NVRAM standby mode > down > Serial0/0 130.4.100.3 YES NVRAM up > up > BRI0/0:1 unassigned YES unset administratively down > down > BRI0/0:2 unassigned YES unset administratively down > down > Virtual-Access1unassigned YES TFTP down > down > Loopback0 130.4.3.3 YES manual up > up > > Thanks in advance for eveyone's help. > > Sincerely, > Kaiser A > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74841&t=74836 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Stuck on Subinterfaces - read the Caslow book [7:74907]
This stuff is covered in gory detail in the Caslow book - I wouldn't have completed my CCNP/CCDP with that. Rich wrote: > > Could someone help a CCNP student who is really confused? I am currently > studying for the BSCI Routing Exam using the Sybex Books on a home Lab of 4 > 2500's and 1 2600. It has been working great and I have always been very > pleased with the Sybex Series. Unfortunately they have never covered > Subinterfaces well enough and many of the Labs In the CCNP BSCI book are > using > them without much explanation. They have various Labs that use OSPF, IS-IS, > BGP etc. to route IP over Serial Subinterfaces on what I see as just a > "Plain > old LAN". All they do is show the IP Addresses and Networks already > arranged, > some on Serial Subinterfaces, and go right into the Routing Protocol > configurations. They don't say anything at this point about using a Frame > Relay, ATM, IPX, or ISL for VLAN's on them in this book. Those topics are > covered in the Remote Access and Switching Books. My problem is: when I > set > up Subinterfaces on the Serial Ports with IP Addresses, set the clocking, > and > then bring up the interfaces, they all show as Interface Up and Line > Protocol > up - But I just can't seem to Ping any of the IP's on the Serial ports if > they, > or the other end they are attached to, are Subinterfaces. If I can't Ping I > sure can't route right? When I stick to regular physical interfaces, > everything works great. Am I missing something important? If any of you > Cisco > Experts out there could offer any suggestions, I would hugely appreciate > it. > I'm kind of stuck on Stall right now and can't move on to any of the other > Labs > until I resolve this. Thanks. > > Rich. > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74907&t=74907 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: PBR on 7200 subinterfaces [7:75055]
If you're trying to use the modular QoS CLI on subinterfaces its something of a mess - you have to create 'backpressure' at the physical interface level so bandwidth available is less than what your policy needs, or everything stays FIFO. I had a production network with this issue and I finally just gave up and pushed the QoS stuff out to the edge and crossed fingers on the core. "Salmons, Malcolm" wrote: > > Hi > > I'm trying to do policy based routing on a FE subinterface on a 7200 and am > having problems at present, i.e. not working. I'm not sure if the router > doesn't do PBR on subinterfaces or if I need a newer IOS version. I'm > currently running 12.0.15.S3 > > Any help appreciated. > > Best regards > > Malcolm > > * > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Primus > Telecommunications through the Virus Control Centre. For further information > on this or the Primus range of Voice, Mobile, Data & internet business > solutions call Primus Telecommunications on. > > Phone UK: 0800 8361234 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://www.primustel.co.uk > > This electronic message contains information from Primus Telecommunications > Ltd, which may be legally privileged and confidential. The information is > intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If > you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If > you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by > telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. Any views, > opinions or advice expressed in this electronic message are not necessarily > the views, opinions or advice of Primus Telecommunications. It is the > responsibility of the recipient to ensure that any attachments are virus > free and Primus Telecommunications bear no responsibility for any loss or > damage arising in any way from the use thereof. > * > Make a PrimusTalk PC to Phone call today! > Go to http://www.iprimus.net to learn more. > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 "After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own" - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75073&t=75055 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
CCIP - who is doing this one? [7:45166]
I'm back to reading groupstudy after an eighteen month abscence. My
CCNP/CCDP certs which I finished 12/2000 and 1/2001 are working wonders
career wise, but I am doing a lot of carrier type stuff now and I've
lined up projects that pretty much cover the BSCI, MCAST+QoS, and MPLS
tests for CCIP - no reason not to get it done if I am going to do the
reading anyway.
I am curious to know the stats - how many people have completed this
cert? I was about #1500 on CCDP and I'd like to think I'll be able to
better that on the CCIP.
Neal Rauhauser
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45166&t=45166
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]
I recently asked who was doing CCIP and got a raft of responses - "Its just like the CCNP", "Just got get your CCIE", "It doesn't make sense". Rather than continuing that thread I thought I'd highlight the differences and mention why the CCIP is more interesting than CCIE in many cases. The CCNP covers routing, switching, remote access, and troubleshooting. When completed, the cert holder is capable of entering IOS commands without having too many of them spelled out, and can identify the correct books to read to fill in his/her knowledge gaps. No disrespect intended - I've got it, its done wonders for my career, but the biggest effect I've seen is that it has let me accurately articulate just how much further I have to go. The CCIE is full of useless crap from the perspective of a service provider. DLSw+? I mean, do I care about this? And IPX? And Appletalk? If you're in a provider environment I *suppose* you could argue it might be of some use, but I bet I can make just as good an argument for getting your real estate license as a career booster. Now look at the CCIP. Nothing *but* routing as a fundamental requirement. If you read the other stuff you can see Cisco things this is for the big boys only - you'll be working 12xxx boxes and you don't care much about ISDN dial support. Where are you going to get good MPLS information? Cisco Press has a book out, but CCIE != person who read and fully understood that book. I need to configure it, not just be able to define the acronym. And then there is multicast. Conceptually simple, fundamentally evil, and known to attract wing nuts with business plans based on it. I've got two wing nuts with their checkbooks cocked and locked right now - if they can't run a single 384k stream from their site and have it fan out to N+1 paying remotes I get to keep eating Ramen, instead of moving up to TV dinners. There are a lot of other very heavy things in the various CCIP tracks, I'm just touching on the ones that can be done with gear I can afford and appeal to my existing customer base. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45893&t=45893 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
old IPv6 beta image grovel [7:46009]
Does anyone have any of the old IPv6 beta images for 16xx series? These would be the ones that provided BGP on access routers :-) I have a ton of 1605s hanging around so I am whipping up a little lab. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46009&t=46009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
full routes via BGP: Cisco 2650 [7:46066]
This one is taking full routes from UUNet and AT&T without any special configuration. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/ibld/view.pl?i=support Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Apr-01 03:26 by ccai Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x81019D3C ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.1(3r)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) ROM: C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) A uptime is 12 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 13 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c2600-is-mz.121-5.T7.bin" cisco 2650 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x00) with 126976K/4096K bytes of memory. Processor board ID JAB04310CY8 (1982591658) M860P processor: part number 5, mask 1 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46066&t=46066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: full routes via BGP: Cisco 2650 [7:46066]
This is a 2650 getting full routes from AT&T and UUNet with a T1 to each provider. Total: 101929412, Used: 67234276, Free: 34695136 PID TTY Allocated FreedHoldingGetbufsRetbufs Process 0 0 75536 18084650980 0 0 *Init* 0 0752 970112752 0 0 *Sched* 0 0 17642116 10399220 187676 163440 0 *Dead* 1 0280280 3864 0 0 Load Meter 2 0 9028 212388 9920780 0 OSPF Hello 3 0 0664 6864 0 0 Check heaps 4 0 20248 0 27112 0 0 Chunk Manager 5 0 20008464 24080 1999566131440 10880 Pool Manager 6 0280280 6864 0 0 Timers 7 0280280 6864 0 0 Serial Backgroun 8 0 0 0 6864 0 0 ALARM_TRIGGER_SC 9 0280280 6864 0 0 Environmental mo 10 06596964 31309820 367921641380 0 ARP Input Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46073&t=46066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wireless feature set for 26xx series? [7:46079]
Does anyone know what this thing does? I've been using 12.2T for IPv6 support and I just noticed the image below, labeled IP PLUS IPSEC 56 WIRELESS - is that for the 5.8 gig wireless NM? Anyone using this stuff in the field? c2600-ik8sw6-mz.122-8.T4.bin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46079&t=46079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISCO KNOWS SQUAT (was any good linux BGP simulator [7:46088]) [7:46107]
This one is just too juicy to pass up :-) The concise question is "Why would you use linux/freebsd or an appliance based on them instead of purchasing a real router?" Cisco rules the backbone, they do enough on lan switching to get my vote their, and their Aironet radios are OK if you're abusing 802.11b by running it as a wireless internet provider but ... CISCO KNOWS SQUAT ABOUT ROUTER/WIRELESS INTEGRATION! There, I've said it. Detaled proof of concept is below: Lets consider a network I recently installed. I've got a tower on a building on a bluff that overlooks a valley where there is no DSL service. On the opposite side of the valley I have another tower on a building on a bluff. The two towers are separated by about three miles. Some sites in the valley can see one side, some can see the other, neither site would cover the whole valley properly. The building closest to my head end has an elevator shaft on top with my small tower bolted to the side. There is room for a good sized 19" cabinet and AC power. The building on the opposite side of the valley has a beautiful 50' tower on top but the only facilties on the roof are a NEMA outdoor enclosure. The NEMA enclosure can take a couple of radios and maybe a small hub but would not take any router larger than a 1605. So, this one building has a backhaul link, it has a customer cell, it feeds the cell across the valley, and I have two other customers attached to this location that received dedicated point to point links for a total of one cell and four point to point wireless links. There is also a wired link to our customers in the building. From the layer three perspective this location has four /29s used for point to point (why not /30s? you tell me, but ponder the wonder of VLANs and OSPF first :-] ), one /27 that is the customer cell, and a /29 for the wired customers. How would you build a network with six total subnets, one wireless cell, and four point to point links, using only Cisco equipment? This is the parts list with estimated pricing: Cisco 2620 $1500 Catalyst 1912 $300 Aironet AP352 $650 four x WGB352 $1800 total $4250 Now consider the alternative - a $400 PC, a $50 flash card, $200 for a linux based wireless capable OS from http://www.mikrotik.com, two PCI Aironet cards ($350) and a Dlink quad port ethernet card ($100). $1100 total I still needed the $650 AP and one external $450 WGB352 - $1100 for this. So, for $2200 I got the effect of purchasing $4250 of refurbished Cisco gear. Now lets look at the soft benefits of MikroTik vs IOS: Feature MikroTikIOS ssh yeswith provider image OSPF yesyes PPTP server yesnot that I can find PPPoE server yesyes, clumsy rate shape PPPoE client bit rate per user nope, just IOS traffic controls NAT yesyes processorAMD 1 gig 40 MHz PPC memory 256 megmax out at 64 meg firewall ipchains(cool) clumsy access lists user interface killer CLI clumsy CLI annual support $500 or so including aironet about 3X MT costs Over a three year period the MikroTik box is going to cost me about one fourth of what I'd pay for a minimal Cisco solution and the performance of the MT is on par with a 7206 /w an NPE300. Now there are a lot of reasons to prefer Cisco in the backbone over MikroTik, but I'm not going to say anything :-) You'll just have to download the free eval of MikroTik and make it work with your Cisco lab if you want to know ... > I always see people asking for Linux/Unix sims for BGP > or just to simulate a router in General. I for the life of me can't > figure out why a Linux router could be better than a 2501 and > it would cost me more to build a Linux box. I see the same with Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46107&t=46107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO KNOWS SQUAT (was any good linux BGP simulator [7:46142]
There is one sensible argument against what I've said, but this isn't it. Try again and put some thought into it. "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > No one ever accused cisco of being a charity... > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > ""Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > This one is just too juicy to pass up :-) > > > >The concise question is "Why would you use linux/freebsd or an > appliance > > based on > > them instead of purchasing a real router?" > > > > > > Cisco rules the backbone, they do enough on lan switching to get my vote > > their, and > > their Aironet radios are OK if you're abusing 802.11b by running it as a > > wireless > > internet provider but ... > > > > CISCO KNOWS SQUAT ABOUT ROUTER/WIRELESS INTEGRATION! > > > > > > There, I've said it. Detaled proof of concept is below: > > > > > > Lets consider a network I recently installed. I've got a tower on a > > building on a > > bluff that overlooks a valley where there is no DSL service. On the > opposite > > side of > > the valley I have another tower on a building on a bluff. The two towers > are > > separated > > by about three miles. Some sites in the valley can see one side, some can > > see the > > other, neither site would cover the whole valley properly. > > > > The building closest to my head end has an elevator shaft on top with > my > > small > > tower bolted to the side. There is room for a good sized 19" cabinet and > AC > > power. The > > building on the opposite side of the valley has a beautiful 50' tower on > top > > but the > > only facilties on the roof are a NEMA outdoor enclosure. The NEMA > enclosure > > can take a > > couple of radios and maybe a small hub but would not take any router > larger > > than a > > 1605. > > > > So, this one building has a backhaul link, it has a customer cell, it > > feeds the cell > > across the valley, and I have two other customers attached to this > location > > that > > received dedicated point to point links for a total of one cell and four > > point to point > > wireless links. There is also a wired link to our customers in the > building. > > > > From the layer three perspective this location has four /29s used for > point > > to point > > (why not /30s? you tell me, but ponder the wonder of VLANs and OSPF first > > :-] ), one > > /27 that is the customer cell, and a /29 for the wired customers. > > > > How would you build a network with six total subnets, one wireless cell, > > and four > > point to point links, using only Cisco equipment? This is the parts list > > with estimated > > pricing: > > > > Cisco 2620 $1500 > > Catalyst 1912 $300 > > Aironet AP352 $650 > > four x WGB352 $1800 > > total $4250 > > > > Now consider the alternative - a $400 PC, a $50 flash card, $200 for a > > linux based > > wireless capable OS from http://www.mikrotik.com, two PCI Aironet cards > > ($350) and a > > Dlink quad port ethernet card ($100). $1100 total > > > > I still needed the $650 AP and one external $450 WGB352 - $1100 for this. > > > > > > So, for $2200 I got the effect of purchasing $4250 of refurbished Cisco > > gear. > > > > > >Now lets look at the soft benefits of MikroTik vs IOS: > > > > Feature MikroTikIOS > > ssh yeswith provider > image > > OSPF yesyes > > PPTP server yesnot that I can > find > > PPPoE server yesyes, clumsy > > rate shape PPPoE client bit rate per user nope, just IOS > > traffic controls > > > > NAT yesyes > > processorAMD 1 gig 40 MHz PPC > > memory 256 megmax out at 64 meg > > firewall ipchains(cool) clumsy access > lists > > user interface killer CLI clumsy CLI > > annual support $500 or so including aironet about 3X MT costs > > > > > > Over a three year period the Mik
config backup - cisconf from cpan.org [7:46239]
I am using cisconf from CPAN.org - its a modifiable perl module for doing backups to a tftp server. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46239&t=46239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP prefix study [7:46726]
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > At 4:07 PM -0400 6/16/02, Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555 wrote: > >My only explanation for this is that there was nothing good on TV on a > >lazy Sunday morning ... > > > > I am about to start doing some truly gruesome things with IBGP due to > >geographical separate peering points and I've got some internal routers > >that are maxed out at 64 meg, so I spent a little time this AM examining > >the source of this silly 114k+ entry global BGP table. My idea was that > >a carrier stuck smack in the middle of the US could probably ignore > >details about RIPE and APIC address space. Those two authorities turn > >out to be responsible for only about 32k of the total so I am casting > >around for other methods to trim the fat but I thought I'd share the > >results thus far. > > You'll find a LARGE part of the routing table still comes from the > Swamp [1] or the Toxic Waste Dump [2], rather than any geographical > region. > > Neal, this is a distinctly nontrivial problem, with no ideal > solution. Your basic choice is accepting "suboptimal routing [3]" or > upgrading your routers. > > Several basic questions come up about what you are trying to do: > > 1. Is this for an ISP or an enterprise? Internet provider, doing wireless, playing with private line replacement stuff, too. > > 2. From a bandwidth standpoint, how many peering points could you > lose and still have acceptable performance? I've got a single Sprint T1 at one end of the network, an AT&T and UUNet T1 at the other end. The Sprint side will grow quickly to more capacity, the AT&T and UUNet stuff is a colo company, not mine to rule, so they're fussy about how much output we generate, but don't care much about our input side. > > 3. To how many different AS do you connect, and do they have > approximately > equal connectivity? Sprint, AT&T, UUNet, probably going to add one more at the end where the Sprint circuit is, but I suspect it'll be UUNet there, too. > > 4. What is your IGP? Today its OSPF and that is the one I know best. There is some cause to consider replacing OSPF area 0 with EIGRP due to different cost links and varying 'cleanliness' in the wireless layer, but we'll see how that goes - I have enough to do without worrying about redistribution right now. > > 5. How much effort, including programming, are you willing to do to > optimize tables? Lots and lots ... keeps me off the street and contributes to passing my CCIP BSCI exam I think ... > > 6. Do you have a decent familiarity with RPSL, routing registry, and > some > of the freeware tools such as CIDRadvisor and RtConfig? > I've made a few basic entries in the RADB, I've played with cflowd, and I've not done much with the automation tools in this area. I'll prefer to hand tune at first, until I really understand what I am facing. > > Howard > > [1] The Swamp is the term used in addressing working groups to refer > to 192.0.0.0/8, the original Class C space. > > [2] The Toxic Waste Dump, which probably is somewhere in Northern New > Jersey, is that part of the Swamp containing /24 or longer prefixes. > > [3] People often worry about suboptimal routing, but the gains of one > "perfect" > path may be marginal when compared with the complexity of > differentiating it from a "decent" route. > > -- > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > directly to me*** > > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46888&t=46726 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aironet SNMP tricks revealed [7:48574]
I spent about twenty hours last week dorking around with AP35x and BR35x, MRTG, and snmpwalk on a unix box. I've created some MRTG configs that will graph common 802.11b errors vs good fragments and I posted the MIBs used along with links to two MIB browsers that will produce the OIDs you need to drive MRTG. The documentation is kinda crappy, the information is incomplete on CCO because of MIB compile problems with old Aironet enterprise MIBs, and its a real pain to figure out - but now you have no excuse, since I've done 95% of the hard work for you. I also started an Aironet SNMP specific mailing list at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can see what has been done so far at http://aironet.wispair.net/ FYI this little dab that I put up is a good read if you want to get started doing stuff with MRTG besides the out of the box bandwidth management - I haven't bothered to extend it to other devices but one could dig around in the MIB directory on Cisco's site and create all sorts of cool monitoring tricks. -- = mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]phone: 402-301-9555 = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48574&t=48574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crazy slow BGP convergence - why? [7:48621]
Below is the relevant config information from two Cisco 26xx routers separated by an ethernet switch. Neither is running more than 15% utilization but its taken ninety minutes for 950 routes to make it from the 2650 to the 2620. Why is this so slow? > > !Cisco 2620, 64 meg, IOS 12.2.8T2 > router bgp 25943 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 63.170.237.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > network 63.170.238.0 mask 255.255.254.0 > neighbor 12.22.183.193 remote-as 20333 > neighbor 12.22.183.193 description Exanium Cisco 2650 peers /w 7018 & > 701 > neighbor 12.22.183.193 filter-list 1 in > no auto-summary > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^20333 701_ > > !Cisco 2650, 128 meg, peers with AS701 & AS7018 > router bgp 20333 > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 12.22.183.192 mask 255.255.255.192 > network 12.36.200.0 mask 255.255.254.0 > network 12.36.210.0 mask 255.255.254.0 > network 12.108.204.0 mask 255.255.252.0 > neighbor 12.22.183.229 remote-as 25943 > neighbor 12.22.183.229 description WispAir border router AS 25943 > neighbor 12.22.183.229 distribute-list 66 in > access-list 66 deny any > ex2620#sh ip bg su BGP router identifier 63.170.237.254, local AS number 25943 BGP table version is 3094, main routing table version 3094 1004 network entries and 993 paths using 137108 bytes of memory 300 BGP path attribute entries using 19080 bytes of memory 295 BGP AS-PATH entries using 8940 bytes of memory 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory 317 BGP filter-list cache entries using 3804 bytes of memory BGP activity 1731/6097 prefixes, 1888/895 paths, scan interval 60 secs NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 12.22.183.193 4 203331941 107 308700 01:42:49 991 > -- > Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd > "They say it takes hardship, boy, to let you love the rest, > sometimes underneath the load is where I show my best" - Widespread > Panic -- = mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]phone: 402-301-9555 = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48621&t=48621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
