[AFMUG] *&%$ 320

There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320 network, it has hit multiple sites at once. I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on very limited access points good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage. uplink MCS for the most pa

[AFMUG] 320 sync

Hello I'm planning my 320 - 450 migration I need to squash the old Wimax spectrum use a little Does anyone know if a 10mhz 320 will sync with a 7mhz or 3mhz 320? Thanks Rhys

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a somebitch. Started around dusk. Don't beat your head into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go from their nominal -45ish to like -35 to -60 in just a couple minutes, and BER alarms like crazy. This is teh suck. On 10/6/2016 8:47 PM, That One G

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are going 3ghz silent On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a somebitch. Started around > dusk. Don't beat your head into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go > from their nominal

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

Under Config->ServiceFlows->QoS Profiles, do the profiles whose numbers you're using (selected on the Default Parameters page) have HARQ enabled? How many retries? Under config->Air Interface -> C/N config, what's the C/N Table Base? default -70? On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarc

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are going 3ghz silent On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup mailto

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

ed at the CPE locations and drew > lines following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to > a ComEd facility. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM &

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

t;> a ComEd facility. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to a ComEd facility. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 lol well it wont be coming fro

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

a ComEd facility.     From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320  

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

You have 600 customers on 320 WiMAX? That would make a person look forward to dying and going to the bad place. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:54 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 good n

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

place. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:54 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 > > > > good night to bring down 600 customers on purp

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 good night to bring down 600 customers on purpose, ive never done that before i know the water company called me yesterday about their system on 917.5 mhz croaking out on them, dont know what killed 900mhz, i

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

at the CPE locations and drew lines following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to a ComEd facility. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 32

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

disabled, no retries, what would help? [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2] [image: Inline image 3] [image: Inline image 4] [image: Inline image 5] [image: Inline image 6] pictures were easier On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: > Under Config->ServiceFl

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

For Uplink (Index 1) try enabled, 2 retries. May need AP reboot. I've heard of people combating interference by tweaking C/N table base up or down a bit but haven't yet had the time to test it myself. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > d

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

e bad place. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:54 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 > > > > good night to bring down 600 customers on purpo

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

Check your active service flow stats. Packet count vs. packets dropped. Anything over 3% packet loss in the uplink and you won't be able to manage them. Uplink packet loss would indicate interference at the tower. Downlink loss would be at the SM level. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, That One G

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

ehalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320   lol well it wont be coming from us for

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 10/7/2016 12:29:55 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 disabled, no retries, what would help? pictures were easier On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: Under Config->ServiceFlow

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

ected to their BS and the customers called us because they had no internet access. -- Original Message -- From: "Jaime Solorza" To: "Animal Farm" Sent: 10/6/2016 10:25:50 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot On Oct 6, 2016

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

they had no > internet access. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Jaime Solorza" > To: "Animal Farm" > Sent: 10/6/2016 10:25:50 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 > > > GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot > > On Oct 6, 20

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

Yup -- Original Message -- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to block cpe destined packets, this should stop some idl

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

harq at the time, i was probably drunk On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Yup > > -- Original Message -- > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" > To: "af@afmug.com" > Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 &

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

Guy /sarcasm" >> To: "af@afmug.com" >> Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >> >> >> I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to >> block cpe destined packets, this should stop some id

Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320

-- Original Message -- >> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >> To: "af@afmug.com" >> Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >> >> >> I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to &g

[AFMUG] 320 fade

Is anybody else seeing an insane amount of fade on 320 APs since about june 16, im in central illinois, seeing it particularly strong on APs facing south, though I dont know if that matters, we are talking 20db fade -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as pa

[AFMUG] 320 SM

Title: 320 SM Forrest posted he needed a 320AP for testing.  Apparently somebody is still using these things.  I have about a dozen SM's if anyone is interested.  Most were deployed, but think I have one or two still NIB.  Hit me off list if you need these. -- Best regards, Mark            

[AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1 cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice. RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something to do with some interference, But it could

[AFMUG] 320 SNMP Reboot

Does anyone know the OID to reboot a PMP 320 AP via SNMP?

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

down. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:20 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] 320 fade Is anybody else seeing an insane amount of fade on 320 APs since about june 16, im in central illinois, seeing it particularly strong on APs facing south, though I dont know if that

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

mounted on a pole so you can just > slide it up and down. > > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm > *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 1:20 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 320 fade > > Is anybody else seeing an insane amount of fade on 320 APs since about > june 1

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

de > it up and down. > > > From: That One Guy /sarcasm <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:20 PM > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] 320 fade > > Is anybody else seeing an insane amount o

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

might work on the trees, too. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:54 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade Ive got a guy at the AP right now verifying the connections, I was really kind of hoping in the back of my mind we had just gotten a bad batch of leads

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

*To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade > > Ive got a guy at the AP right now verifying the connections, I was > really kind of hoping in the back of my mind we had just gotten a bad batch > of leads. Not looking that way. > > Our corn is hydroponic this year, fa

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

I've seen a fair bit of the midnight chainsaw blight.. bp On 7/17/2015 12:05 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Internet is a basic human right now, so we should be able to use eminent domain to condemn trees and crops that interfere with the signal. I am thinking Judge Dredd with a chainsaw and a spraye

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

Need the Wagner music too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30QzJKCUekQ From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 2:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade Im down with drones filled with agent orange. It makes it totally legit because our logo is orange On Fri

Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade

t Orange. That > might work on the trees, too. > > > From: That One Guy /sarcasm > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:54 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 fade > > Ive got a guy at the AP right now verifying the connections, I was really > kind of hoping

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SM

We still use them Mark From: Af On Behalf Of Mark - Myakka Technologies Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 10:53 AM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] 320 SM Forrest posted he needed a 320AP for testing. Apparently somebody is still using these things. I have about a dozen SM's if anyone is inter

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SM

Title: Re: [AFMUG] 320 SM Paul, I will figure out exactly what we have tomorrow and let you know.  Not sure if I have the power supplies for all of them.  Also, may be missing some hardware, but units should be good.  I'll email you tomorrow. -- Best regards,

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SM

Our company has a few PMP320 (WiMAX) SMs, and lots of the 802.3AF power supplies that they use, if anyone wants to buy. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote: > Forrest posted he needed a 320AP for testing. Apparently somebody is > still using these things. I have a

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SM

Ive been trying to offload mine for a couple weeks On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 2:24 PM Colin Stanners wrote: > Our company has a few PMP320 (WiMAX) SMs, and lots of the 802.3AF power > supplies that they use, if anyone wants to buy. > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies < > m

[AFMUG] 320 sm cardboard boxes

does anybody know where a guy could get these boxes, just the shell these things are perfect for organizing things and we quit buying them theres no punch print on any to identify them. I assume somewheres theres a place that sells boxes -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you d

[AFMUG] 320 cpe ethernet freezing

did anybody ever find a resoltion that doesnt involve swapping radios or sending a tech out with heat guns? We RMAd the ones we had with this problem in the past, but now that there is no more product support we dont have that option. for customers who have our router we just patiently wait til eno

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

I used to monitor all kinds of stuff in the 320 SM. The MIB was accurate and I didn't bump into any that didn't work. On 9/15/2015 11:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the bas

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

Do you want it from the AP http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html Or the CPEs? http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

half those would never graph: for example danEthRxTotalBytes Object ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5 Total number of bytes received. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: > D

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

i dont think anyone here has ever been able to monitor throughput that i recall. I tried the .0 witht he counter, still a 0 (powercode) On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts > graphing. That's common with a lo

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

On 9/16/2015 12:36 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: i dont think anyone here has ever been able to monitor throughput that i recall. I tried the .0 witht he counter, still a 0 (powercode) I'm pretty sure I did monitor throughput. I don't have the 320 anymore so can't say for sure.

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

They definitely do not support IF-MIB. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts > graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. > > Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface > OID tree.

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

SM: Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0 Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.2.0 Pulled straight from Cacti. Works like a champ. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Josh Baird wrote: > They definitely do not support IF-MIB. > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup wrote: > >

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

What about AP On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote: > SM: > > Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0 > Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.2.0 > > Pulled straight from Cacti. Works like a champ. > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Josh Baird wrote: > >> They definitel

Re: [AFMUG] 320 monitoring OIDs

No can do. Monitor your swichport instead. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:46 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about AP > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Eric Muehleisen > wrote: > >> SM: >> >> Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0 >> Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SNMP Reboot

gemtekReboot = 1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.2.1.0 On 5/11/2015 11:15 AM, Jon Bruce wrote: Does anyone know the OID to reboot a PMP 320 AP via SNMP?

Re: [AFMUG] 320 SNMP Reboot

..OOPS! That was the sm, the AP does not have snmp reboot, that I know of :( On 5/11/2015 11:15 AM, Jon Bruce wrote: Does anyone know the OID to reboot a PMP 320 AP via SNMP?

[AFMUG] 320 series - still using

I am just curious how many of you have decided to keep using the 320 series because it goes through trees a lot better than the 450 series 3.65 product? Are you expanding with it as far as towers go? Or, are you just adding SMs to what you already have? Paul Paul McCall, Pres. PDMNet / Florid

[AFMUG] 320/450 colocation guide

Cambium posted the 450 3.65 beta colocation guide on the blog (community) website today. We put up one 450 3.65 co-located with a 320AP today. Just starting to play with it. Mark

Re: [AFMUG] 320 sm cardboard boxes

Uline? On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > does anybody know where a guy could get these boxes, just the shell > > these things are perfect for organizing things and we quit buying them > > theres no punch print on any to identify them. I a

Re: [AFMUG] 320 sm cardboard boxes

Subject: [AFMUG] 320 sm cardboard boxes does anybody know where a guy could get these boxes, just the shell these things are perfect for organizing things and we quit buying them theres no punch print on any to identify them. I assume somewheres theres a place that sells boxes -- If you only

Re: [AFMUG] 320 cpe ethernet freezing

Never heard of this and we have over a 1000 320 SM's in the air. There was an issue with cold-snap on the AP that caused reboots (old hardware rev). Is that not the same issue? On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > did anybody ever find a resoltion that doesnt involve sw

Re: [AFMUG] 320 cpe ethernet freezing

no, when the temps get really cold, theyll not negotiate at anything other than 10 half. i just found if you reboot them remotely 3-4 times in a row they warm enough to negotiate to get into the router more easily. The handful Ive checked in the history are all mounted on the north side of a house

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some creative Telrad AP deployments gradually replacing the 320 APs, utilizing the 320 CPEs until we migrate the site to LTE with telrad CPEs, giving us 320

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

We still use it. Tons of it. However, we are not doing any new builds or installing any new customers. Purely maintenance mode at this point. Hoping something better comes along that we can migrate to. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:08 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Im

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Don’t they have another WiMAX-to-450 tradeup going on? Kind of a 3650 MHz cash-for-clunkers program. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some creative

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Don’t they have another WiMAX-to-450 tradeup going on? Kind of a 3650 MHz cash-for-clunkers program. From: That One Guy /sarcasm<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:08 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

ne 03, 2015 5:09 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some creative Telrad AP deployments gradually replacing the 320

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

problem. BW limited but works pretty well (*some might debate > that) > > > > *At this moment, can you add ANY new 3.65 AP locations (from any > manufacturer) or forced to wait until the “next” thing comes to play with > the FCC rules?* > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-bo

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

bject: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using I am just curious how many of you have decided to keep using the 320 series because it goes through trees a lot better than the 450 series 3.65 product? Are you expanding with it as far as towers go? Or, are you just adding SMs to what you already

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split 2x2 sectors) to put 30, 40 or even 50 customers on a site which is all we have in rural areas. We'll never make any money buying Telrad. I can put up 4 sectors

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Replacing UBNT with what? 450? Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup wrote: > > I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good > performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split 2x2 sectors) > to put 30, 40 or even 50 customers

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

il the “next” thing comes to play with > the FCC rules?* > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using > >

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Yes On 6/3/2015 8:16 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: Replacing UBNT with what? 450? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup > wrote: I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a du

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

OK, but under what rule set, for how long before you have to comply with the new rules coming out? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:51 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using You can still add new 3.65 AP

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net From: Paul McCall Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:40 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using But, if you are using 320 for NLOS solutions, the 450 trade up means you’re going to lose customers since the 450 doesn’t do

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

7-965-3699 www.royell.net *From:* Paul McCall <mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:40 PM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using But, if you are using 320 for NLOS solutions, the 450 trade up means you’re going

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

Ben, The testing was based on using the standard Cambium antenna, respectively, for both platforms. Paul From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ben Royer Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:11 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using What antenna are you

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using What antenna are you using in your testing of the 450 vs. 320 NLOS? I’m just curious because this is an interesting report, as we have a network of around 2,500 320 customers, and we are in the same position of looking for

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

, 2015 9:11 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using What antenna are you using in your testing of the 450 vs. 320 NLOS? I’m just curious because this is an interesting report, as we have a network of around 2,500 320 customers, and we are

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

McCall Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:42 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using With or without…. Made like difference. Sometimes the reflector made no different and on occasion made it worse depending on the densities of the trees. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

hat rule set, for how long before you have to comply with > the new rules coming out? > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:51 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using >

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

450 out performs the 320. Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Manager Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net From: Paul McCall Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 8:30 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Ben, The testing was based on using the

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:18 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Paul, Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side of the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP. However, at the SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS test

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

] *On Behalf Of *Ben Royer > *Sent:* Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:18 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using > > > > Paul, > > > > Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side > of the test, as we t

Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using

* Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:18 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using Paul, Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side of the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP. However, at the SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS te

Re: [AFMUG] 320/450 colocation guide

my money is on balls On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af wrote: > Cambium posted the 450 3.65 beta colocation guide on the blog (community) > website today. > > We put up one 450 3.65 co-located with a 320AP today. Just starting to > play with it. > > Mark -- All parts

Re: [AFMUG] 320/450 colocation guide

The installers are reporting no alignment tones on the 3.65 450 SM's installed using 13.2.1 with 5ms frame timing. Arg... Mark On 12/22/14, 9:58 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af wrote: Cambium posted the 450 3.65 beta colocation guide on the blog (community) website today. We put up one 450 3.65 c

Re: [AFMUG] 320/450 colocation guide

Oops - make that 13.3 (Build 15) Beta Too many version numbers. Mark On 12/23/14, 8:55 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af wrote: The installers are reporting no alignment tones on the 3.65 450 SM's installed using 13.2.1 with 5ms frame timing. Arg... Mark On 12/22/14, 9:58 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af

[AFMUG] 320 AP powered from Edgerouter

Hello I'd like to power a 320- AP from a Ubiquiti edgerouter (48v) Does anyone know if I would need custom patch lead and do I need to change pin-outs? Has anyone ever tried this? Thanks Rhys

[AFMUG] 320 with a public IP

All our 320s are in bridge mode. We have a fool customer who is irritating me though, I need to isolate him from our network so I want to put it in NAT mode, but I need to have him on a public IP so he can be identified in complaints. Are there any known vulnerabilities in the 320 CPE I should be a

Re: [AFMUG] 320 AP powered from Edgerouter

320 does have a weird pinout. I have powered it from passive 48v sources before and it worked. You might find the pinout written on a standalone 430/320 power supply if you have one. Otherwise you'll have to check a manual. The idea is to put + and - on twisted pairs rather than + on one

Re: [AFMUG] 320 with a public IP

I wouldn't recommend doing it there are not any known security issues that I can speak of. I do know however that your performance on that CPE will be go down significantly and I do know outside request can kill them. I guess a sort of vulnerability. On 5/9/2016 11:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm

Re: [AFMUG] 320 with a public IP

Does 320 have 'remote configuration interface' in the NAT tab? I think this is equivalent to 'separate management interface'. I'm not very familiar with the 320 line... or maybe change it to a random nonstandard port just for said customer and then firewall the port at the tower/edge? On Tue, May

Re: [AFMUG] 320 with a public IP

The 320 CPE's have a known open DNS resolver issue (responding to DNS queries from external hosts). I have seen some of the NAT enabled CPE's choke on the external DNS requests and we then see 95% packet loss to them. Most of our 320 CPE's operate in bridge mode. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:38 AM,

Re: [AFMUG] 320 with a public IP

Ill just leave this guy on internal IP space On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:55 PM, jeff pastuck wrote: > The 320 CPE's have a known open DNS resolver issue (responding to DNS > queries from external hosts). I have seen some of the NAT enabled CPE's > choke on the external DNS requests and we then see