On 6/17/22 04:25, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
Hi,
If you run tar by hand on the DLE does it finish? After how much time?
Thanks for the suggestion. That made me notice that it was bogging down
dealing with a *very* deep directory that had been created by a buggy
process going into infinite
Hi,
If you run tar by hand on the DLE does it finish? After how much time?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:50:11AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 6/15/22 09:38, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
On 6/15/22 09:38, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
> don't see any recent changes on the server except possibly a change from
> kernel 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7 to 3.10.0-1160.66.1.el7 on Jun 2nd, but the
> problem didn't start until
Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
don't see any recent changes on the server except possibly a change from
kernel 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7 to 3.10.0-1160.66.1.el7 on Jun 2nd, but the
problem didn't start until June 6th.
The tar command is stuck trying to
anged over to the new user (because the
uid# is the *real* presence of a user... not the stringy name).
Use "dpkg -V amanda-backup-server" and I think it'll check the
ownership/validity of the install. Remember .. the server has both server and
client binaries .. so its what you want.
I
> version like "gitg" or something is far better, if you can because
> it's very hard to visualize in the first two years of use. Even so,
> things like local changes are good to make and easy to stow away.
>
> Restarting from a "reset --hard " or a nicer "che
r a nicer "checkout -b mineno2
..." is always possible... but beware as some changes you make can be lost.
On 5/11/19 9:32 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Despite changing the name in the rules file, its hard coded to be
amanda-backup in the .dsc files. GRRR
Without fixing this, how the hell
Despite changing the name in the rules file, its hard coded to be
amanda-backup in the .dsc files. GRRR
Without fixing this, how the hell do we get rid of the older version
trash when updateing it? Seems like a heck of a good question to me. Do
we expect the users to wear out find
018 21:10:36 +0100
> From: Charles Stroom
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: amanda backup fails, because of wrong suid settings
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is on Linux Opensuse 42.3 with amanda 3.5.1 compiled from tar
> file. Today I discovered that amcheck failed to run,
On Monday 10 December 2018 18:04:47 Elias Pereira wrote:
> Hello Helge,
>
> Thanks for the answer!!!
>
> In my cups webgui does not have that tiny triangle!!! Can you show me
> with a printscreen?
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM Helge Blischke
wrote:
> > > Am 10.12.2018 um 17:35 schrieb
Sorry, but below replace "sticky bit" by "suid bit".
Charles
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:10:36 +0100
From: Charles Stroom
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: amanda backup fails, because of wrong suid settings
Hi all,
This is on Linux Opensuse 42
ent amdump failed:
From: amanda@fiume7.localnet (Amanda Backup)
To: root@fiume7.localnet
Subject: daily_backup FAIL: AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR ? 2, 0
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:29:02 +0100
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
*** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!
Org : daily_bac
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:00 -0500
Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 12:51:45 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> > May I request you end two irritants about the Debian version. It
> > creates a user, "backup". That's fine, although "amanda", say,
> > would
Steve,
The amanda-client can be run with any user.
The user is compiled in, but it doesn't need to be the same on the
amanda server and amanda-client.
What was the problem?
Jean-Louis
On 09/01/17 02:41 PM, Steve Wray wrote:
For what its worth, this creates problems with inter-operability
For what its worth, this creates problems with inter-operability between
CentOS and Debian; we rebuilt the CentOS rpm for amanda client so it used
the backup user instead of amanda, as our amanda server was on Debian. We
tried hard but never found a way to configure this.
It would be nice to be
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 12:51:45 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> May I request you end two irritants about the Debian version. It creates
> a user, "backup". That's fine, although "amanda", say, would avoid
> stepping on some other user named "backup".
>
> The irritant is that debian makes the
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single stanza
amanda file in it.
An ls -lau shows that file,
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single stanza
amanda file in it.
An
Gene,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of
the things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works,
there is not an /etc/xinetd.d
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:34:16 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the
On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of
the things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box,
On 07/18/2014 11:43 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:34:16 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
-
From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:39 AM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup, logging connection
refused
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:34:16 +0700
Olivier Nicole olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
What do I check next?
Firewall?
That's bitten me more than once.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not
There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to /etc/amandahosts
BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to /etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck,
no change and that file was not accessed.
The actual file SHOULD have a dot at the beginning of the name.
.amandahosts
I guess if the one
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
Trying to figure out why amanda
the netstat -na |grep 10080:
gene@lathe:/etc/xinetd.d$ netstat -na |grep 10080
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10080 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
udp0 0 0.0.0.0:10080 0.0.0.0:*
Which should look better. But it doesn't make amcheck happy:
Amanda
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett
What do I check next?
Thank you.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
Since Olivier wrote that he only used xinetd once, I figured I’d best chime in.
I use it all the time (not that I know very much about it). Here are parts of
my CHECKLIST
for a new node:
yum install openssh-server
yum install
] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup, logging
connection refused
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of
the things I noticed
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:10:10 Charles Curley did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:34:16 +0700
Olivier Nicole olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
What do I check next?
Firewall?
That's bitten me more than once.
No firewalls running on any machine, I have a dd-wrt
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:11:24 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to
/etc/amandahosts BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to
/etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck, no change and that file was not
accessed.
The actual file
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:11:24 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to
/etc/amandahosts BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to
/etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck, no change and that file was not
accessed.
The actual file
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:44:49 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On
Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
More than one xinetd or inetd running?
Maybe some basic background is in order. The basic operation of
*inetd is pretty
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:26:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single
On Friday 18 July 2014 13:24:12 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
What do I check next?
Thank you.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
Since Olivier wrote that he only used xinetd once, I figured I’d best
chime in. I use it all the time (not that I know very much about it).
Here
On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {cnf_start_services} Service amanda failed
to start and is deactivated.
then...
--
Joi Owen
System Administrator
Pavlov Media, Inc
-Original Message-
From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:36 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
backup user on the server is amanda, but neither client machine even has
an amanda (or backup) user. Presumably its backup:backup on the clients.
The /var/backups/.amandahosts files were different, so I made the failing
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:27:20 Jon LaBadie did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:26:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:51:39 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859
: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org
[mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Gene Heskett Sent:
Friday, July 18, 2014 1:36 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup, logging
connection refused
On Friday 18 July 2014 13:24:12 Debra S Baddorf
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis jlel...@pavlovmedia.com wrote:
I think you have a more basic network connectivity issue. If it were a
simple .amandahosts issue, you'd get an error message to that affect, not
'connection reset by peer', which is a network thing.
Don't forget to
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:06:49 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
backup user on the server is amanda, but neither client machine even
has an amanda (or backup) user. Presumably its backup:backup on the
clients.
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis jlel...@pavlovmedia.com wrote:
Don't forget to check the logs on the server and the client, see
/var/log/Amanda/*, find the newest files in there and see what they say.
do a locate(or a find / -iname “*am*” ) to find your amanda logs.
Joi
On Jul 18, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:51:39 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
already
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:24:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis jlel...@pavlovmedia.com
wrote:
I think you have a more basic network connectivity issue. If it were
a simple .amandahosts issue, you'd get an error message to that
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:38:36 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis jlel...@pavlovmedia.com
wrote:
Don't forget to check the logs on the server and the client, see
/var/log/Amanda/*, find the newest files in there and see what they
say.
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:49:47 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
ps auxww | grep net
Except for PID's both machines are identical:
shop:
gene@shop:/etc$ ps auxww | grep net
root13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?SJul11 0:00 [netns]
root 1128 0.0 0.0 1984
Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on Jul
18, 2014:
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
On Friday 18 July 2014 16:16:15 John Hein wrote:
Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on Jul
18, 2014:
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
is right for you
change to “auth=bsd” if that’s what the
working node has
2. Edit /etc/services and add this line to the end of the file, if there is any
old amanda related lines comment them out:
amanda 10080/tcp # amanda backup services
3. Restart the inetd demon
On Friday 18 July 2014 16:16:15 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on
Jul 18, 2014:
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
that have to be dealt
with. There is a general trouble shooting page for possible issues
that result in selfcheck request failed --
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, jefflau wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning using it
in the workgroup without dns server.
I was Using Ubuntu 12 and installed it by using apt-get, by searching many of
the issue resolved. Till this stage I do a month can't resolved it.
Hope someone able
Can you send the amanda.conf file?We need a little more information here.
[ If you are already discussing this with somebody, then never mind! ]
Deb
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:08 AM, jefflau amanda-for...@backupcentral.com
wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue
failed --
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, jefflau wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning using
it in the workgroup without dns server.
I was Using Ubuntu 12 and installed it by using apt-get
, jefflau wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning
using it in the workgroup without dns server.
I was Using Ubuntu 12 and installed it by using apt-get, by searching many
of the issue resolved. Till this stage I do a month can't resolved it.
Hope
'. By freeze I mean a complete
freeze of the system (ie. no system log entries, but
system [ie. disks] is still running).
I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but
have noticed that the three times this has happened an
amanda
happened an amanda backup was running. I even
moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holding
disk and final backup disk are single disks.
My question is if anybody could think that amanada could be the
contributing factor
ago, but have noticed
that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I
even moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the
holding disk and final backup disk are single disks.
My question is if anybody
. disks] is still running).
I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed
that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I
even moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both
this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed that
the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I even
moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holding
disk and final backup disk are single disks.
My
entries, but system [ie. disks] is still
running).
I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed
that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running.
I even moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my
).
I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed that the
three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I even moved the
time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holding disk
and final backup disk
I'm evaluating possible solutions for Drop in USB backup. as an
existing amanda user, I was interested by the possibility of having
amanda run a backup of a flash drive whenever it's connected. I've
got a few simple requirements for this backup operation. 1) a backup
should happen whenever a
On 11/17/2010 08:23 AM, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
on an RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
# rpm -ivh --test amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libtermcap.so.2
At Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:17:43 -0500 Julian C. Dunn li...@aquezada.com wrote:
On 11/17/2010 08:23 AM, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
on an RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
# rpm -ivh --test
while installing amanda-backup-client on RHEL 5 64-bit
To: Yogesh Hasabnis yhmai...@yahoo.co.in
Cc: amanda-users amanda-users@amanda.org
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 7:09 AM
I think you should install termcap and libtermcap packages. Use yum.
Paddy
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Yogesh
...@yahoo.co.in* wrote:
From: Yogesh Hasabnis yhmai...@yahoo.co.in
Subject: Error while installing amanda-backup-client on RHEL 5 64-bit
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:53 PM
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm on
an RHEL 5
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm on an
RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
# rpm -ivh --test amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libtermcap.so.2 is needed by
Hi All,
I would appreciate your suggestions if any.
Thanks in advance,
Yogesh
--- On Wed, 11/17/10, Yogesh Hasabnis yhmai...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
From: Yogesh Hasabnis yhmai...@yahoo.co.in
Subject: Error while installing amanda-backup-client on RHEL 5 64-bit
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Date
We are running amanda server on Solaris 10 and the
client on a citrix box and trying to backup a virtual
machine on citrix.
Our config on the server is identical to similar setup
we have on another network
define dumptype zwc {
auto bsdtcp
maxdumps 1
compress client fast
programDUMP
}
but when
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
We seem to be missing something in our config but I'm not finding
the key in the wiki. What should I be looking for ?
I'm guessing that amanda/tcp isn't in your services db? On most
systems, that's /etc/services, but on
Dustin,
Genious!
Of course we had upd defined in /etc/services but we
neglected to add a second definition on the same socket
id for upd.
It was of course present on the parallel system that was
working for PC but non-citrix clients.
thank you,
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
We seem to be missing something in our config but I'm not finding
the key in the wiki. What should I be looking for ?
I'm guessing that amanda/tcp isn't in your services db? On most
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
hoogen...@bio.umass.edu wrote:
I don't mean to question Dustin
I rather enjoy being questioned, so don't worry about that!
This was a guess, and apparently I was correct this time around.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
Chris,
No and Yes.
I have been running an amanda server on this particular system
for a while, but its not the system where I have been running
an amanda server that included PC/windows clients.
The system that has been working includes in /etc/services
the following.
grep amand
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ga jimenez55
amanda-forum at backupcentral.com wrote:
amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
amtape: slot  5: Error reading Amanda header
amtape: slot  2: Error reading
i have this problem when i use those command i have this error
amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
amtape: slot 5: Error reading Amanda header
amtape: slot 2: Error reading Amanda header
I am trying that amanda read the tape's barcode of
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ga jimenez55
amanda-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
amtape: slot 5: Error reading Amanda header
amtape: slot 2: Error reading Amanda header
Do those tapes have Amanda
Thanks for your prompt replies.
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
amanda-forum at backupcentral.com wrote:
On the forum, I found people facing the same problem and the error was
related to the tapecycle. Mine is 12 and I have 12 reusable tapes.
Are you sure of the size of your tape? 4Gb is with compression or not,
Do your data are compressible or not, are you using software compression?
Jean-Louis
mandaillou wrote:
Thanks for your prompt replies.
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
amanda-forum
Hi everybody :D
This is my first post in this forum and maybe not the last.
I'm a newbie using Amanda and I'm facing a problem with my backup.
I'm working with Amanda 2.5.2p1.1 under RHEL 3.
My backup strategy is really simple :
- full backup every day on 1 tape
- dumpcycle : 2 weeks
- tapecycle
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
amanda-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
On the forum, I found people facing the same problem and the error was
related to the tapecycle. Mine is 12 and I have 12 reusable tapes.
Right -- if you're doing 14 backups (2 weeks, every day), you're not
going
mandaillou wrote:
NOTES:
taper: tape DailySet-05 kb 1783648 fm 2 writing file: No space left on
device
The tape got full after 1783648 was written, you need bigger tape.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:39 PM, rory_f [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb,
failed a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
What was
This is an edited version of a previous post
Hi,
We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb, failed
a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
After the
Amanda writes data to tape as quickly as the tape drive will allow.
The tapespeed is not currently used.
The data may be in local cache, explaining some of the high speed. I
don't know SATA-1 rates off the top of my head to know if that's too
fast.
Whatever goes on, data corruption should not
Hi
Are there users on the list using Amanda to backup Lustre file systems?
I would be interested in connecting to understand some of the details.
Thanks
tk
-
Ram TK Krishnamurthy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Friday 18 January 2008 17:27:52, vous avez écrit :
In this case, I am starting amdump test by running:
$amdump periodic
I did exit the shell, so perhaps the command is not enough to
prevent the SIGUP from being processed?
It is not. Putting a process in the background does NOT close
In this case, I am starting amdump test by running:
$amdump periodic
I did exit the shell, so perhaps the command is not enough to
prevent the SIGUP from being processed?
Thanks,
Jordan
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, John E Hein wrote:
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18,
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2008:
Greetings all,
In experimenting with AMANDA I've been running into a problem where
I'll start a backup, everything will go swimmingly, and sometime down
the line, the backup is stopped, and no AMANDA processes are running.
John,
After looking up what you suggested, I'm almost entirely sure you're
right. If I start the job manually, I'll use nohup, disown or screen.
Thanks so much for your help!
Jordan
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, John E Hein wrote:
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2008:
John,
I was using:
$amdump periodic
After looking up what you suggested, I'm almost entirely sure you're
right. If I start the job manually, I'll use nohup, disown or screen.
Thanks so much for your help!
Jordan
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, John E Hein wrote:
Jordan Desroches wrote
Craig Dewick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Olivier Nicole wrote:
My Sun L9 array has told me it needs a cleaning tape run. I have one so
that's no problem but what I'd like to know is if there is a way that
Amanda can receive info from the tape drive about the requirement for
cleaning and
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Olivier Nicole wrote:
My Sun L9 array has told me it needs a cleaning tape run. I have one so
that's no problem but what I'd like to know is if there is a way that
Amanda can receive info from the tape drive about the requirement for
cleaning and co-ordinate cleaning tape
4096 Nov 13 11:55 BabyMobile
drwx--2 mysqlmysql4096 Nov 13 11:55 BestClub
If I put only /var/lib/mysql in disklist, can amanda backup for /var3/mysql?
Or should add both /var/lib/mysql and /var3/mysql in disklist? Please
advise.
You would need both. /var/lib/mysql
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo