darrenyeats;317708 Wrote:
Michael,
You are absolutely right about SNR decreasing. The only thing I would
add is that this factor is the only thing to worry about. Bits don't
come into it. The reason is that by the time any bits are lost they are
lost at the small end, and that is buried
Thanks a lot for the advice. This is one of my perplexed questions
about high-end audio equipment: what exactly a pre-amp does other than
source switching and volume control (assuming line level amplification
is not needed in my system)? If I have a decent source equipment such
as the
darrenyeats;317708 Wrote:
A TP can play a decent range of volumes without the SNR dipping below
96db (the SNR of 16 bits). You don't need any more SNR than that to
play red book in all its glory. IMO for red book on a TP a preamp will
result in more distortion overall and at best divert
The inhertent noise floor of any electronic component is around 120 db ,
ie round 21 bits so 24 bit SN ratios (144db) are rubbish. IE there is
no hifi component that can give you a snr of 144db , 120db is prolly
all thats achievable by even the best component.
Ostensibly , if you really believe
Rodney_Gold wrote:
The inhertent noise floor of any electronic component is around 120 db ,
ie round 21 bits so 24 bit SN ratios (144db) are rubbish. IE there is
no hifi component that can give you a snr of 144db , 120db is prolly
all thats achievable by even the best component.
Perhaps with
Frank,
I came to this forum not long ago and enjoyed your writing very much.
One question: have you tried to connect your modded TP to a power
amplifier directly? Correct me if I am wrong: I don't have other
source equipment, so I don't need a pre-amp with the TP, the TP's
volume control is
tricka;285116 Wrote:
H
doesn't it matter more about synergy in components and personal
listening tastes? I've found that you really can't say something is
better or not, just that it suits your system as you like to hear it.
I'm fascinated at the emotion this stirs up! Personally I
I have read that musicians use different acoustic guitars for different
songs. Its still an acoustic guitar.
I have read that some professional studio engineers use different
speakers(monitors) for different songs. Its still speakers(monitors)
--
eiret
eiret;307320 Wrote:
I have read that musicians use different acoustic guitars for different
songs. Its still an acoustic guitar.
I have read that some professional studio engineers use different
speakers(monitors) for different songs. Its still speakers(monitors)
Good point! I like
95bcwh;297763 Wrote:
ShockinglyI'm not new to these forums, I just left for a while, but
I'm shocked to come back and found that people here still wasting their
time arguing with Tom.
Guys..do you know that he has hearing deficiency?
Have a nice day!
Sorry , 95, I have my ears
H
doesn't it matter more about synergy in components and personal
listening tastes? I've found that you really can't say something is
better or not, just that it suits your system.
I'm fascinated at the emotion this stirs up! Persoanlly I thought the
original post wasn't that ra ra - I read
tricka;285116 Wrote:
H
doesn't it matter more about synergy in components and personal
listening tastes? I've found that you really can't say something is
better or not, just that it suits your system as you like to hear it.
I'm fascinated at the emotion this stirs up! Personally I
haraldo;285123 Wrote:
Hmmm..
I would be a bit worried if some equipment worked with some music and
some equipment worked with other kinds of music.
b.t.w. I love your opera house :-D
Oh I don't know...I think that tube tonal colour doesn't suit all
styles of music. I like my
haraldo;284638 Wrote:
I normally use Sikaflex adhesive and a dirt cheap BlackDecker heating
gun to fix the holes when we have snipers in our area
I've heard the silkaflex has good room treatment acustics as well.
Did you DBT before and after bullet hole fix?
--
tomjtx
tomjtx;284558 Wrote:
BTW, does anyone know a good drywall/painter guy to fill the bullet
holes in my walls?
I normally use Sikaflex adhesive and a dirt cheap BlackDecker heating
gun to fix the holes when we have snipers in our area
--
haraldo
Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop / SC7 - SB3 -
tomjtx;284644 Wrote:
I've heard the silkaflex has good room treatment acustics as well.
Did you DBT before and after bullet hole fix?
Yas, I did DBT, and I compared Sikaflex and some brands of Acrylic
glue, you seem to get slightly better midrange dynamics with Sikaflex,
and a bit less treble
I've given up trying to change the minds of audiophiles. There's only
one alternative left.
Darren
PS: Sorry about your wall.
PPS: It would help if you sat still just for one darned minute!
--
darrenyeats
SB3 / Inguz - Krell KAV-300i (pre bypass) - PMC AB-1
Dell laptop - JVC UX-C30 mini
I'm so confused..
I thought the ceiling texture worked best to diffuse bullet backwaves?
Anyone here live in the SF Bay Area? I'd love to audition that wooly
Modright TP and the tizzy stock TP side by side. I have a slightly
modded SB3 with the Welbourne PS.
I added a nice DIY VH Audio power
darrenyeats;284774 Wrote:
I've given up trying to change the minds of audiophiles. There's only
one alternative left.
Darren
PS: Sorry about your wall.
PPS: It would help if you sat still just for one darned minute!
I can't sit still , a moving target is harder to hit.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx;284897 Wrote:
I can't sit still , a moving target is harder to hit.
There's been an olympic event...
Shooting on running targets
In Norwegian we call this: Shooting on running boar
Perhaps quite ok to describe audiophiles.
--
haraldo
Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop / SC7 -
Thanks for the kudos. And yes, you guys are correct about the
comparo. :) I did not have both products in my room at the same
time. In fact they were at least a month apart, and my memory is
what we're we talking about?
Seriously, the stock sound was pretty evident, and not that
I would agree on the stock sound - very transparent and revealing but
the highs aren't 'tizzy,' just accurate and I have a very resolving
system. Tizzy sounds like the stock unit would have a problem or be
inaccurate.
Thanks for your post Ted. Good to hear your thoughts.
Bill
--
mr_bill
mr_bill;284492 Wrote:
I would agree on the stock sound - very transparent and revealing but
the highs aren't 'tizzy,' just accurate and I have a very resolving
system. Tizzy sounds like the stock unit would have a problem or be
inaccurate.
Thanks for your post Ted. Good to hear your
mr_bill;283857 Wrote:
I posted on the Audiocircle forum on the Transporter thread asking the
reviewers for the comparison to the stock Transporter, but that was
blown off.
In my mind - what's the point of just reviewing the modded Transporter
without coomparing to the stock unit? Maybe
rydenfan;283865 Wrote:
How were you blown off? this was Danny Kaey's response to you:
howdy... I won't be reviewing the stock TP per-se; I'll spend most of
the time in the Truth TP domain - I feel it eclipses the former by a
considerable margin as to devote an entire review to it when the
tomjtx;283628 Wrote:
Now now ,Adam, of course there was a point. I don't respect loony tune
reviewers like srajean, Kaey and others of their ilk.
I do respect your taste in music a great deal , however.
So I'm not all bad :-)
I do have to go away soon tonight. A swedish classical
Back in the old days we would flavor our recordings with tone controls.
Nowadays we do it with amps, cables and modifications.
What I and others have said about the Modwright Transporter should not
be taken as the stock one sucks but instead the Transporter is such
a great device and proves
rajacat;284015 Wrote:
Sand amps have their colorations too! Every amp that I've owned had it's
own flavor. Actually, you can just change a cap or two in most good amps
and there will probably be a slightly different sound quality. If sand
amps don't color the sound they should all sound the
Phil Leigh;284056 Wrote:
You clearly can't distinguish improved from different...
What is the problem here? Sticking some valves across the o/p is going
to make it sound different for sure...and some people will prefer that
sound which is fine. But it is not better in any absolute sense -
xand1x;284050 Wrote:
x2. Srajan's review would have been more credible if he compared it to a
stock transporter in all fairness. I highly doubt financial constraint
was a limiting factor either =\
I agree. Srajan should have had a stock TP on hand as a reference.
-Roy
--
rajacat
tomjtx;284122 Wrote:
... comparo between the two.
...do a realtime comparo...
...ted did a direct comparo...
comparo.
Jeez, I just cannot...hmm
http://www.comparo.co.uk/ _?
.
--
haunyack
Transporter | BK 200.2 | Vandersteen 3A Signature
C.G. Conn New York Wonder
haunyack;284129 Wrote:
Ah yes ;-)
Thought you may have coined a new buzz word.
When I hear the term comparo again, I will attribute it to tomjtx.
.
Alas, I cannot take credit, that is a word oft used on head-fi.
Do not go gentle into the night
rage against the dying of the light
do a
tomjtx;284132 Wrote:
Alas, I cannot take credit, that is a word oft used on head-fi.
Do not go gentle into the night
rage against the dying of the light
do a comparo blind without sight
Sorry 'bout the hijack y'all.
head-fi, this newbie will check that out.
Phones?
I'm yet to explore
For anyone that is interested 6moons just reviewed the Modwright
transporter and favorably compared it to a $30,000 Esoteric player.
Needless to say it was awarded a 6moons award. Here is the review:
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/modwright3/transporter.html
--
rydenfan
rydenfan;283380 Wrote:
For anyone that is interested 6moons just reviewed the Modwright
transporter and favorably compared it to a $30,000 Esoteric player.
Needless to say it was awarded a 6moons award. Here is the review:
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/modwright3/transporter.html
Who
rydenfan;283380 Wrote:
For anyone that is interested 6moons just reviewed the Modwright
transporter and favorably compared it to a $30,000 Esoteric player.
Needless to say it was awarded a 6moons award.
Cheers, interesting to see. I have almost written off the Linn stuff
completely because
Actually I agree with Tom (some). It would have been more interesting to
compare a stock TP vs modded vs whatever...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with
tomjtx;283423 Wrote:
Who cares?
That reviewer also saw no point in comparing or even listening to a
stock TP. The reviewer couldn't be bothered to listen to a stock
component.
Why give credence to such a biased reviewer?
If Srajean did a DBT comparo of the Mod TP , the Esoteric and a
Tom you truly never cease to amaze me. You get upset if somebody posts
about the Modwright in any thread. So the only place I have discussed
it is here, and yet you still bash. What is your problem?
Here is something just for you! This is a quote from Danny Kaey who is
the US editor for The
Disappointing review, I agree. As I have said before, I have heard both
the stock and the Mod and while both are great, prefer the Modwright.
Definitely worth a listen for anyone who has interest.I think the
6Moons review is not very valuable without a comparision to the stock
model. As with all
haraldo;283601 Wrote:
I think everybody should be allowed to post their opinions, we don't
always have to agree :-)
I think the negative remarks on the Music Vault was weird, to say the
least, in such a review.
I think everyone should be allowed to post their opinion as well.
That is
tomjtx;283622 Wrote:
Srajean's refusal to compare a stock TP and his implied dismissal of
the stock as not worth his time is the sort of audiophile snobbery that
has no place in a serious reviewer. Unfortunately most reviewers are
like that.
Which is why I almost don't read Stereophile
rydenfan;283612 Wrote:
Tom you truly never cease to amaze me. You get upset if somebody posts
about the Modwright in any thread. So the only place I have discussed
it is here, and yet you still bash. What is your problem?
Here is something just for you! This is a quote from Danny Kaey who
adamslim;283564 Wrote:
Cheers, interesting to see. I have almost written off the Linn stuff
completely because of the quality of SqueezeCenter; this is probably
the only digital upgrade I could make.
Tom, there was no point to your post. Go away. :)
Now now ,Adam, of course there was a
Shredder;283613 Wrote:
Disappointing review, I agree. As I have said before, I have heard both
the stock and the Mod and while both are great, prefer the Modwright.
Definitely worth a listen for anyone who has interest.I think the
6Moons review is not very valuable without a comparision to
Lefatshe;278634 Wrote:
the audiophile goal: faking-out your brain so you believe you're at the
live concert.
I really enjoy that description :-))
--
haraldo
Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop / SC7 - SB3 - Benchmark DAC1 - Krell
KAV400xi - Meadowlark Kestrel2 / Duntech PCL-15
Everything is
Thanks Frank for describing your equipment with the ModWright
Transporter. In my short experience with audiophile equipment the
associated equipment, the room and the wires all matter. I'm glad your
ears love it. The audiophile who sold me my Transporter (thanks Karl)
highly recommended Dan's
Phil Leigh;270306 Wrote:
The mosquito works at 17.4khz...if you can hear that and are over 25,
you have bat ears.
There are CD's with stuff on up there - but you aren't going to miss it
too much IMHO.
I'm 39 and have no problem hearing the mosquito or other tones in the
17-18k range.
twylie;270617 Wrote:
I'm 39 and have no problem hearing the mosquito or other tones in the
17-18k range. Guess I'm fortunate, but this high end stuff would be
less expensive for me if my ears rolled off at 15k. :-)
Then you are certainly incredibly lucky...and have almost certainly
never
ted_b;270145 Wrote:
The vile and unsupported criticism (i.e without ever hearing it) on this
thread is embarrassing.
Well to be fair, you kind of set yourself up for it be saying how much
better your TP is than those of other posters on this forum. However
true that is, it's bound to annoy.
CardinalFang;270295 Wrote:
when I'm only hearing a fraction of what's on the CD.
I'd rather hear a fraction, than a fraction of a fraction.
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
Patrick Dixon's Profile:
The mosquito works at 17.4khz...if you can hear that and are over 25,
you have bat ears.
There are CD's with stuff on up there - but you aren't going to miss it
too much IMHO.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call
Phil Leigh;270306 Wrote:
There are CD's with stuff on up there - but you aren't going to miss it
too much IMHO.
I guess my point was that we ought to recognise that our ears are
significantly degraded by age, loud concerts, iPods etc., so we
shouldn't get too wound up about accuracy when in
It's a good point. I guess it indicates that 48KHz, 96KHz and up audio
is more about how good or bad the pre-ADC filters in the recording
process are, rather than anything in the replay chain. After all, if
we can't even hear 17KHz, there's not much point in worrying about
reproducing 24KHz -
Even though it's claimed that what happens above 20KHz is of no
interest, we still can hear the effects of what happens above 20KHz,
this may be as phase shifts, for instance...
A brick wall analog filter at 22KHz is definitely audible.
Why is it so that adding a murata supertweeter that
CardinalFang;270295 Wrote:
Well to be fair, you kind of set yourself up for it be saying how much
better your TP is than those of other posters on this forum. However
true that is, it's bound to annoy.
??? I never said such a thing. I entered this thread very late, and I
said I
Patrick Dixon;270438 Wrote:
It's a good point. I guess it indicates that 48KHz, 96KHz and up audio
is more about how good or bad the pre-ADC filters in the recording
process are, rather than anything in the replay chain. After all, if
we can't even hear 17KHz, there's not much point in
I am Dan's first Modwright TP customer and have had it for months now.
It is the best digital front-end I've ever heard, and I've heard many.
I like it, in my system, in my well-treated room, quite a bit more than
the stock TP, a wonderful invention if I say so.
I've posted pics and comments
ted_b;270145 Wrote:
I am Dan's first Modwright TP customer and have had it for months now.
It is the best digital front-end I've ever heard, and I've heard many.
I like it, in my system, in my well-treated room, quite a bit more than
the stock TP, a wonderful invention if I say so.
ted_b;270145 Wrote:
I am Dan's first Modwright TP customer and have had it for months now.
It is the best digital front-end I've ever heard, and I've heard many.
I like it, in my system, in my well-treated room, quite a bit more than
the stock TP, a wonderful invention if I say so.
ted_b;270145 Wrote:
I am Dan's first Modwright TP customer and have had it for months now.
It is the best digital front-end I've ever heard, and I've heard many.
I like it, in my system, in my well-treated room, quite a bit more than
the stock TP, a wonderful invention if I say so.
ted_b;270145 Wrote:
The vile and unsupported criticism (i.e without ever hearing it) on this
thread is embarrassing.
Don't be embarassed. It's par for the course around here. In the
future I'd recommend just not posting in this forum and let them start
ragging on each other when they find
I placed my order with Dan yesterday. I will post my impressions once it
arrives.
--
rydenfan
rydenfan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15335
View this thread:
opaqueice;268032 Wrote:
What evidence do you have for that?
That's not how he describes them on his website. Of course, what he
says doesn't make any sense at all, so that's not saying much.
HalleysComet,
opaqueice is a physicist so he speaks with some authority when he says
the
It would be interesting to see some MEASURED performance of various
Transporter modifications. Before I get the usual chorus of
measurements don't count, sound does, let me point out that
measurements DO clearly count, because the ear and brain are apparently
registering a difference. It seems
Pat Farrell;267868 Wrote:
Shredder wrote:[color=blue]
Glad you like it. As far as I'm concerned, anyone can listen to, and
like anything, and its fine by me. Its your ears and your money.
All the arguing about circuits and parts is hot air.
IMHO.
Ah, a breath of fresh air! As usual
Timothy Stockman;268234 Wrote:
Does MW make any attempt to quamtify the improvement they make?
. . .
Anyway, what does MW specify is the improvement?
Actually, they do not claim anything. But you can find what the other
people say. This thread is a good start. Also, you can have a look at
HalleysComet;267932 Wrote:
Hope this helps!
Thanks Frank. I still have some concerns (apart from how it would sound
in my system ;-):
o- if there's space for both Maui and ModWright mods
o- if ModWright mods are reversible
o- vibration damping (mostly tubes)
o- the length of the wires going
About the measurements:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38815page=19
--
alekz
alekz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13574
View this thread:
HalleysComet;267843 Wrote:
Jack Bybee was able to develop a successful solution to allow sonar
listeners to more reliably detect enemy submarines, using technology he
developed that was kept classified by the US Navy for a number of years.
What evidence do you have for that?
Well, the
tomjtx;267543 Wrote:
I auditioned a full blown bolder SB and a modded TP in my home for
several weeks each doing careful, level matched comparisons. So at
least some making comments have heard the other gear :-)
I stayed with the stock TP. The other gear was not an improvement to my
[cold-induced rant]
I think part of the problem here is some slightly unfortunate choices
of language.
For example, the OP used the word limitations implying that the MW is
absolutely better that the inherently flawed original TP output stage.
It isn't - it's just different. Valves aren't
Phil Leigh;267621 Wrote:
Valves aren't better than transistors - they are just different.
That's fine. Nothing wrong with that. But can we please have a
moratorium on the unqualified use of the word better? No-one can
define better in this context.
Valves may not be intrinsically better
Please notice that nobody mentioned measurements in this thread ;-) (see
here: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38815page=19)
Probably (since people will mod their TP/SB's anyway) it would be
useful to create threads dedicated to all available mods. Or at least
to compare them.
adamslim;267631 Wrote:
Valves may not be intrinsically better than transistors, maybe, but I'm
pretty sure transistors -sound- worse than valves ;)
NO THEY DON'T! It's all about the circuit, not the devices. You can
make anything sound like anything if you want to.
I use both. To my ears,
tomjtx;267439 Wrote:
You could have gotten the same result feeding transporter through a tube
preamp or buffer.
Not quite.
The difference will be:
o- coupling capacitors
o- balanced stage (1x5534 per shoulder, 4 in total)
o- unbalanced stage (1x5534 per channel, 2 in total)
o- attenuator
adamslim;267631 Wrote:
Valves may not be intrinsically better than transistors, maybe, but I'm
pretty sure transistors -sound- worse than valves ;)
Phil Leigh Wrote:
Rant
opaqueice Wrote:
Rant
Crikey calm down calm down, there's me thinking smileys are there for a
purpose, to show - in
GuyDebord;267603 Wrote:
and the willingness to consume 4000 in credit or cash.
the transporter has years of research and development on it, electrical
engineers, designers, software engineers, etc. The technology, features
and sound is truly worth 2000 euros, the tp reflects innovation
I am sure I will be flamed for my beliefs, but I have to say I do find
it very interesting that everybody who KNOWS that either the
Modwright Transporter is a waste of money or that the same thing could
be achieved in another way has never heard one. Yet everybody who has
indeed listened seems to
rydenfan;267776 Wrote:
I am sure I will be flamed for my beliefs, but I have to say I do find
it very interesting that everybody who KNOWS that either the
Modwright Transporter is a waste of money or that the same thing could
be achieved in another way has never heard one. Yet everybody who
Timothy Stockman;267790 Wrote:
OK, what is non-standard about his analog stage? Does he use a
non-standard circuit topology? What is unique in his circuit?
I don't have access to a circuit diagram, but from what I can see, and
have read, the stage is optimized for class A operation of the
HalleysComet;267786 Wrote:
The analog stage in his Transporter modification is hardly extremely
standard
OK, what is non-standard about his analog stage? Does he use a
non-standard circuit topology? What is unique in his circuit?
--
Timothy Stockman
HalleysComet;267786 Wrote:
Dan was one of the first to accept and utilize the work of Jack Bybee,
to deal with the effects of HF interference in high bandwidth audio
circuits.
Really? So much for ModWright, then.
--
opaqueice
opaqueice;267827 Wrote:
Really? So much for ModWright, then.
X2, I didn't realize modwright was into that bybee nonsense.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this
opaqueice;267827 Wrote:
Really? So much for ModWright, then.
Yeah, I know. But really...
Jack Bybee was able to develop a successful solution to allow sonar
listeners to more reliably detect enemy submarines, using technology he
developed that was kept classified by the US Navy for a number
Shredder wrote:
I chose the MW TP direct into my amps over the other options, ie nice
Dac into nice pre, TP into nice pre, great Dac w/no pre.
Give it a listen. I suspect most will like it. If not, you will be able
to make an educated judgment.
Glad you like it. As far as I'm concerned,
Frank (aka HalleysComet), I see no reason why you have to defend your
choice. If it sounds better (for you), than it's the way to go (for
you). Period.
I second rydenfan here. That reminds me a couple of real interviews I
heard:I have't read the book, but it's bad, I will not read it and I
HalleysComet;267786 Wrote:
While I respect your point of view, I disagree with one of your key
premises.
Dissatisfaction with the state-of-the-art, and the willingness to
explore alternatives is central to progress in sound reproduction
technology. Most of the leading lights in this
alekz wrote:
Too often it
shows how bad the recordings are. Not how good the music is.
Isn't this a curse of any accurate audiophile system?
Whatever you do, don't play CSNY's Four Way Street CD. It is terrible.
Out of tune, loudness wars, clipping, etc. I had such grand memories of
that as
Pat Farrell;267872 Wrote:
alekz wrote:
Too often it
shows how bad the recordings are. Not how good the music is.
Isn't this a curse of any accurate audiophile system?
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you. Accurate (but unlistenable) vs
distorted (but rather enjoyable) dilemma.
The
tomjtx;267888 Wrote:
I auditioned the maiu mod and ab'd it directly with my stock
transporter.
What was the rest of the system? Was it the 1st Anthony's iteration
with the analogue stage not touched?
tomjtx;267888 Wrote:
The best thing I could say is he didn't make the modded TP sound
I auditioned the maiu mod and ab'd it directly with my stock
transporter.
There was no differance that could be identified by me or 2 other
experienced
listeners, a recording engineer and a high end dealer.
The best thing I could say is he didn't make the modded TP sound
worse.
What a total
What if this whole conversation was about some speaker wire?
Poster 1 Wow, company X's modification of Logitech's speaker wire has
totally transformed the sound! Everything's become so real!!!
Poster 2 If a mod on a speaker wire makes that much difference, and
the original speaker wire pretty
tomjtx;267841 Wrote:
X2, I didn't realize modwright was into that bybee nonsense.
Yeah, what a disappointment!!
--
crooner
Customized dual chassis Super Squeezebox
EAD DSP-7000 Series III DAC with HDCD and mods.
VPI Scout with Benz Micro Glider M2
Marantz 10B tube FM tuner
Audio Research
alekz;267853 Wrote:
Let's get back to the subject. I have a couple of questions to those
who have heard both the stock and modded Transporter.
o- Frank, you mentioned that the stock TS sounds(-ed) more detailed.
Could you please elaborate? Do you hear less details now? Are they
masked
adamslim;267438 Wrote:
Thanks for sharing (does that sound like an AA comment? ;) ). Out of
interest, why did you go for the Modwright over other modders?
I've previously purchased Dan Wright's modified Perpetual Technologies
P3A DAC and was very pleased with the result (no tubes!).
Thanks for sharing (does that sound like an AA comment? ;) ). Out of
interest, why did you go for the Modwright over other modders?
--
adamslim
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have
others
SB+, EAR V20, Living Voice OBX-R2s plus some other stuff
SB3, Charlize,
You could have gotten the same result feeding transporter through a tube
preamp or buffer.
I love tubes also but it is a shame you wasted that money when you
could have gotten the same results for a fraction of the price.
It is getting a bit tiresome listening to talk about the illusory
tomjtx;267439 Wrote:
You could have gotten the same result feeding transporter through a tube
preamp or buffer.
I love tubes also but it is a shame you wasted that money when you
could have gotten the same results for a fraction of the price.
It is getting a bit tiresome listening to
adamslim;267440 Wrote:
You could have gotten a better result by not posting.
Now now, Adam, I should be allowed a few cranky posts per month :-)
Seriously though, I would never post on the Modwright forum about what
a waste it is to mod the TP.
I would consider that rude and unnecessary
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
