MAC ACLs [7:33554]

2002-01-29 Thread Vijendra Jaiswal
Hello All , Can anyone pls post a sample configuration of the MAC addresses ACLs so as to restrict the MAC addresses using Access Control Lists . Thanks in advance , Vijendra. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33554t=33554

RE: CCNPs and CCDPs [7:32166]

2002-01-29 Thread Luke Sheppard
Well, all the certs lower than CCIE are good for two things (in my opinion): 1. folks wanting to change careers can show a certain level of competence right away. 2. these days resumes are searched for keywords in corporate HR and recruiter databases, so job postings tend to favor resumes that

RE: 6509 with Router on stick [7:33217]

2002-01-29 Thread Taco Hettema
Hello Mike, you probably forgot to configure a default route in the 6509. Taco Hettema -Original Message- From: Mike Lynnette Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vrijdag 25 januari 2002 18:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 6509 with Router on stick [7:33217] Hello, I was

Feasible distance? [7:33557]

2002-01-29 Thread Colin
Hi Just reading about EIGRP @ Cisco's web site and am having difficulty understanding the difference between Feasible distance and Reported distance. Throw a Feasible successor in the mix and now I'm really confused. Please correct me if I'm wrong but from what I understand, the Reported

another OT: Cisco´s first web site? [7:33558]

2002-01-29 Thread paul
Sorry for the way OT content, but i thought there should be at least someone interested in seeing Cisco4s first site ;) http://web.archive.org/web/19961106114149/http://ieng.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33558t=33558

RE: Cache Engine [7:33442]

2002-01-29 Thread Dimitris Vassilopoulos
You should configure in the global configuration of the 7204: 7204(config)#ip wccp web-cache You should also redirect http traffic from the intresting interfaces of the 7204 to the cache engine. conf t interface serial x ip wccp web-cache redirect out Cache engine should be configured like

Re: More Confused!!! Re: Neighbor commands...Yes or No?? [7:33560]

2002-01-29 Thread Henry D.
I think you're still confused. Both physical frame interface and multipoint sub-interface are by default OSPF Non_Broadcast type. This means for OSPF to function you'd need to configure neighbor command in either scenario. With the config you showed on RTA (the HUB router) you wouldn't even be

Re: MD5 encrypting vty passords [7:33533]

2002-01-29 Thread bergenpeak
Is the MD5 encryption used when one enables the service password-encryption before entering the vty password? What encryption mechanism is used when a password is entered as type 7? Thanks Henry D. wrote: It's not possible to use MD5 on vty's. I suppose the reason would be that MD5 enable

RE: RE: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511]

2002-01-29 Thread Ouellette, Tim
Are you still going on about this *grin* Sure feels weird being call the someone in your earlier comment of I was in a discussion with someone this weekend regarding terminal server configuration. Hehhehe. The conclusion I came up with is as followings. Let's say your on a router and you ping

RE: Feasible distance? [7:33557]

2002-01-29 Thread Georg Pauwen
Hi Colin, take the following example: RouterA -- RouterB -- RouterC -- Ethernet The reported distance is the distance from RouterB to Ethernet. The feasible distance is the distance from RouterA to Ethernet. If there is a second link to Ethernet from RouterA: RouterA -- RouterF -- RouterG --

RE: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
I try not to use the following on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload the link without having any user

RE: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
This didn't seem to post earlier I try not to use the following on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload

RE: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Joseph Brunner
see comments below -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306] Hi all, I'm after some ideas if you'd be so kind :-) A 2Mb link being used mainly for

Re: Custom Upgrade for Cat 5000 Switch [7:33294]

2002-01-29 Thread Brad Ellis
Mike, I know someone who also needs one. If you have another, let me know. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Sweeney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I found it :) right on top of the piles Anyways.. the

Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload the link without having any user

Re: help me with the pix problem! [7:33287]

2002-01-29 Thread John Kaberna
Are you reading your other thread? Several people have pointed out your problems. Please check the responses to your original post. You still have the same problems that people told you how to fix. John Kaberna CCIE #7146 www.netcginc.com (415) 750-3800 Instructor for 5-day CCIE class for

Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload the link without having any user

Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload the link without having any user

Re: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread John Kaberna
Godswill I believe he is asking about the alias command since that is specifically used for DNS doctoring. But, if his clients are on the same network as the DNS server it won't work. But, as you said, I'm not quite sure what he is asking. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/alias.html You

RE: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
Hmm the last one made it I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows media and real have such large client side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly overload the

Re: Limit access to serial link to four [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
Ok this is like the 8th time I've sent this, maybe I'm tripping the new spam systembut never had a problem posting before. I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but have also never had it fail to deliver service when there was no other choice. The common streaming of windows

Re: help me with the pix problem! [7:33287]

2002-01-29 Thread Godswill HO
Hi, To really understand this stuff. There are only two ways by which a traffice can pass from a lower security interface to a higer security interface. 1. Use the conduit or access-list command. 2. As a reply to an initial session. For the traffic to be allow in (reply to a session initiated

Re: Cisco Works 2000 amp; Cisco Works for Windows [7:33321]

2002-01-29 Thread John Kaberna
Cisco Works for Windows is basically Whats Up Gold with Cisco View. It's pretty much a waste of money if you ask me. It's not very reliable and your Log viewer refreshes periodically erasing your entire screen for a couple of seconds. There is no way to highlight an event so you can see which

Re: help me with the pix problem! [7:33287]

2002-01-29 Thread Godswill HO
Hi, The command: PIX#conduit permit icmp any any might just be your life saver. Do not forget that though by default traffics are permitted from any inside interface to an outside interface, you have to creat an except for the echo-reply packet from the outside interface to the inside interface.

FW: [Fwd: Re: Limit access to serial link to four [7:33383]

2002-01-29 Thread Gareth Hinton
Darrell, As you put so much work in to reply I'll post it myself. Thanks for your help. I have plenty of ideas to be reading up on. Thanks, Gaz -Original Message- From: Darrell Newcomb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January 2002 18:29 To: Gaz Subject: [Fwd: Re: Limit access to

Re: what to do ? (longish) [7:33392]

2002-01-29 Thread Brad Ellis
Why do you want to complete the other certs? Is there something extra they will do for you that your current standing wont? If not, then go for your CCIE. If the other certs will open other doors for you in your current position (or in the seeking of another position), determine where you

RE: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
I have a dns on inside using static (200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30) . The dns database is resolving names to valid IP's. The problem is the worktations from inside can't access these servers using the valid IP's.I found some docs on Cisco site about DNS Doctoring (

Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Gaz
Darrell, As you put so much work in to reply I'll post it myself. The formatting has been lost in cut and paste but info all there. Thanks for your help. I have plenty of ideas to be reading up on. Thanks, Gaz -Original Message- From: Darrell Newcomb Sent: 27 January 2002 18:29 To: Gaz

PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
I have a dns on inside using static (200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30) . The dns database is resolving names to valid IP's. The problem is the worktations from inside can't access these servers using the valid IP's.I found some docs on Cisco site about DNS Doctoring (

CCIE Ramp;S Lab Exam Study Guides [7:33323]

2002-01-29 Thread Kwame
Has anyone looked at CCBootCamp's CCIE RS Lab Exam Study Guides? If you've, do you mind sharing what you think of them? I'm putting together lab study guides to prepare for the lab so your reviews would be most welcome. Thanks. Message Posted at:

RE: pix problem [7:33183]

2002-01-29 Thread Andrew Larkins
HI, From below there are a few issues here: 1. Your inside users should not be able to work to the outside but can to the DMZ. There is no translation for them on the outside interface. 2. As for the DMZ - NAT 0 says that there is no translation needed / required. Try changing the NAT ID for

RE: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Keyur Shah
Dante, Try this document, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/alias.html -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) css1,ccna,ccda,scsa,scna,mct,mcse,mcp+i,mcp,cni,mcne,cne,cna Hello Computers Say Hello to Your Future! http://www.hellocomputers.com Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556 Now

OT - Cisco CS-508 for sale or trade (2509 less ser [7:33528]

2002-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have three cs-508's for sale or trade, and I would like to know if anyone is interested? I am doing this to cut down on the time it would take to sell these and get what I and some study partners need ( I let other people use this lab as well). On ebay they are usually selling over $300 and

Re: Lab Kit.... [7:33412]

2002-01-29 Thread Brad Ellis
Joe, Here's what I typically sell/recommend for a minumum CCIE kit: 2x 2501s 2x 2503s (for ISDN) 1x 2511 (reverse telnet AS) 2x or 3x 2513s (TR/Ether) 1x 2522 (frame-switch) ISDN Simulator Catalyst 5k switch 3900 TR Switch or 3920 simulator

Re: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
I have a dns on inside using static (200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30) . The dns database is resolving names to valid IP's. The problem is the worktations from inside can't access these servers using the valid IP's.I found some docs on Cisco site about DNS Doctoring (

RE: pix problem [7:33184]

2002-01-29 Thread Keyur Shah
Make sure your dmz network is routed to outside interface of the pix. It seems that you do not want to nat dmz network, if that is not what you want, remove nat(dmz) 0 and add nat(dmz) 1 0 0 statement. -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching)

Re: MD5 encrypting vty passords [7:33533]

2002-01-29 Thread Henry D.
That specifies type 7 encryption, you can enable it before or after you configured your vty's. enable secret is used to enter password which will be encrypted with MD5. If using MD5 don't use it in conjunction with enable password command as that would create another enable password and

Mirroring 2 ports on 2 different VLANs through 1 SPAN port [7:33565]

2002-01-29 Thread Jerry Lu
Hello everyone, I got into a situation here: Hareware: Cisco Catalyst 2900XL ISO: 12.0(5.1)XP Say interface FE 0/1 is assigned to Vlan 10, and interface FE 0/2 is assigned to Vlan 20. Is it possible to make interface FE 0/3 as a SPAN port whcih monitors both FE 0/1 and FE 0/2 ? I need to

CCIE On-line lab prep [7:33566]

2002-01-29 Thread EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR)
It seems like sometime back in the Fall, someone on the list reviewed a remote lab test/training option. This particular lab was timed and had two portions: the practice lab, and the simulated final lab. You could take the practice lab as many times as you wanted, but you could only take the

is it possible to bridge accross a tunnel? [7:33567]

2002-01-29 Thread Eric Waguespack
ok, I have looked into this, and supposedly the answer is yes but the config is unsupported here is the network diagram 10.10.10.x --(R1)--(public network)--(R2)---10.10.10.x this is supposed to do it but i can't seem to make it work: int tunnel 2 no ip addr tunnel source eth 0 tunnel

Assigning an IP address by username [7:33568]

2002-01-29 Thread Cisco Breaker
I want to assign IP addresses to my users based on their username and password on the 2522 router. They are connecting through the async lines. So far I was giving IP addresses from the ip pool but because of the rules on the firewall I have to do something like this. Can it be done without an

RE: PIX VPDN Static IP addresses [7:33503]

2002-01-29 Thread Keyur Shah
Brian, Did you try without pool statement, vpdn group 1 client configuration address local pptp-pool It will use its current ip. Make sure to nat 0 from inside to client's ip. -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) css1,ccna,ccda,scsa,scna,mct,mcse,mcp+i,mcp,cni,mcne,cne,cna

Re: another OT: [7:33569]

2002-01-29 Thread paul
my apologies, here is a better link http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cisco.com - Original Message - From: Jim Dixon To: 'paul' Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: another OT: Paul, I am confused. This is IENG's site. What is Cisco4s?

RE: Multilinking more than two ISDN channels [7:33493]

2002-01-29 Thread KM Reynolds
Steve, I looked into the multilink-group command. On CCO I found documentation titled Configuring MLP on Multiple ISDN BRI Interfaces. This looks like what I was looking for. As per the doc it states to enable multilink PPP on multiple ISDN BRI interfaces, I need to set up a dialer

Cisco Secure ACS, AP350, and Orinoco AP1000 [7:33571]

2002-01-29 Thread Terry Hartman
I've got a customer that currently has one Orinoco AP1000 AccessPoint and needs two more AccessPoints to cover the area they want wireless connectivity to. They are interested in using Cisco AP350s (the Orinoco was purchased without anyone giving their blessing - better to ask for forgiveness

Re: another OT: [7:33569]

2002-01-29 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I like the old Cisco better. It's easier to look at. paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... my apologies, here is a better link http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cisco.com - Original Message - From: Jim Dixon To: 'paul' Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Feasible distance? [7:33557]

2002-01-29 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
This is the way I understand it (if the drawing below doesn't come out right, draw it on paper): 10 14 A---B---D | | |_C_| 4 22 Let's say router A is trying to reach router D. It is

Re: Mirroring 2 ports on 2 different VLANs through 1 SPAN port [7:33575]

2002-01-29 Thread Gandolf
You can not monitor two Vlans with one port. As a general rule you can not monitor two vlans with one sniffer the port your sniffer is connected to must be in the same vlan you are watching (no multi vlan ports allowed). It is possible to monitor both vlans at the same time with one sniffer by

Re: NPE300 in 7206VXR [7:31534]

2002-01-29 Thread Tom Briscoe
Also, if there is a MII interface, type setting the media-type on the interface to what type your using, I recall having a similar problem in the past. T, TB --- MADMAN wrote: The NPE doesn't have a FE or any port. Do you have a single FE I/O card? These are pretty stable though you may

recommended list of MIB objects for IP network [7:33578]

2002-01-29 Thread Yaron E
Hi All, I am trying to design my NMS system for my IP network. The network consists of Cisco 3640 and 7200 routers, some 2924 and 4000 catalyst switches and 5300 access router. we run OSPF and BGP, MPLS in the future. Does anybody have a recommended list of MIB objects to collect for a start,

RE: BGP and one backup link [7:33433]

2002-01-29 Thread Joseph Brunner
Sometimes As prepending won't work.. your best bet is to telnet to route-views.oregon-ix.net (public route server) and do a show ip bgp with your as # (then you will know who is using your prepended path to get there. Most likely one peer of your backup link providers, sets local pref or metric

OT - 508 CS for trade or sale (2509 less serial po [7:33534]

2002-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have three cs-508's for sale or trade, and I would like to know if anyone is interested? I am doing this to cut down on the time it would take to sell these and get what I and some study partners need ( I let other people use this lab as well). On ebay they are usually selling over $300 and

RE: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
I have a dns on inside using static (200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30) . The dns database is resolving names to valid IP's. The problem is the worktations from inside can't access these servers using the valid IP's.I found some docs on Cisco site about DNS Doctoring (

RE: Multilinking more than two ISDN channels [7:33493]

2002-01-29 Thread Hire, Ejay
You have several different options. You can make a rotary group or a dialer group/pool (the config posted to the group earlier is a dialer group) Good Luck, Ejay -Original Message- From: KM Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: Cisco Secure ACS, AP350, and Orinoco AP1000 [7:33571]

2002-01-29 Thread Georg Pauwen
Terry, I found some info on the following website: http://www.tuanistechnology.com/Orinoco/orinoco_ap1000.htm Industry-Wide Interoperability and Compliance The ORiNOCO AP-1000 is interoperable with other manufacturers' high-speed IEEE 802.11b compliant systems. It's also compatible with

RE: Assigning an IP address by username [7:33568]

2002-01-29 Thread Georg Pauwen
Hi, the only thing I can think of that might come close to what you want is to use the Cisco IOS DHCP-Server on your 2522, assign a dhcp pool for every single user, and configure manual bindings. For example, for user John it would look like this: Router(config)#ip dhcp pool John

Re: css 11000 [7:33498]

2002-01-29 Thread Arinze Okafo
I don't have ssl enabled in the servers. Currently I am load balancing on port 80. I am not sure using SSL 443 would work since I do not have it on the servers. Secondly I am using ICMP for keepalive in the services. Still serching for an answer... Thanks From: Gaz Reply-To: Gaz To: [EMAIL

Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]

2002-01-29 Thread Joseba Izaga
OK... I tested everything. I am using FRTS instead of GTS. The config i am using is ! interface Serial1 bandwidth 256 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay IETF no keepalive no fair-queue frame-relay traffic-shaping ! interface Serial1.1 multipoint ip address

Re: css 11000 [7:33498]

2002-01-29 Thread John Neiberger
Yes, you can load balance on the SSL Session ID. John Arinze Okafo 1/29/02 11:07:39 AM I don't have ssl enabled in the servers. Currently I am load balancing on port 80. I am not sure using SSL 443 would work since I do not have it on the servers. Secondly I am using ICMP for keepalive in

Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]

2002-01-29 Thread Gaz
Thanks for your comments ideas. One thing - I'm under the impression that the Translation timeout is a sliding window (ie the counter starts when the translation ceases to pass traffic), so wouldn't kick a user until he'd been idle for 60 seconds. Still need to test this, but for some reason I've

RE: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
Guys, Thank you for your help. The problem has fixed. There was a router filtering the DNS querys.(ip domain-lookup) The DNS is on DMZ and I have created a alias to each server that was using static. Other problem is: How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from

PIX: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from 10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252). I have tried using telnet command: telnet 10.128.128.0 inside but still no working. Can you help me? Dante CONF MAIN PIX PIX Version 6.0(1) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif

Re: what to do ? (longish) [7:33392]

2002-01-29 Thread Cisco Nuts
CSSP?? Is that a new cert regarding MPLS. I know about the new CCIP but CSSP? :-( From: Brad Ellis Reply-To: Brad Ellis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what to do ? (longish) [7:33392] Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:15:05 -0500 Why do you want to complete the other certs? Is there something

Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to know what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to

Re: css 11000 [7:33498]

2002-01-29 Thread Gaz
I'm not doubting that there is one, but what's the importance of using sticky for http? Fill a gap in my knowledge. I've only ever seen the requirement for sticky for SSL. I've not seen a great deal of load balancing with the CSS 11000's, we use mainly Foundry. What's the role of the

using BGP private AS [7:33595]

2002-01-29 Thread michael qin
Hi, Everyone: I saw some examples to use BGP private AS for single ISP redundancy. I was wonderingwhether I could use it for DMZ. that will disallow customer routes inject to my IGP? ISP1 ISP2 |

RE: Network Monitoring Tool [7:33544]

2002-01-29 Thread Bond, Jeffrey T
I would say the best bang for your buck is Solarwinds Network Monitoring Tools at solarwinds.net which comes in different flavors depending on your job responsibilities. Jeff -Original Message- From: William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:50 AM

RE: Network Monitoring Tool [7:33544]

2002-01-29 Thread William Gragido
Solarwinds works well. But, Cheops is free ;-) -Original Message- From: Bond, Jeffrey T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:01 PM To: 'William Gragido'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Monitoring Tool [7:33544] I would say the best bang for your buck is

Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread John Jones
I have a configuration question. I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) Would I run into issues Here is my config. Would this

RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread James Willard
John, What you want to look at is Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF). It allows load balancing across multiple T1's. For each serial interface you would have your own subnet (such as a /30) to your provider, because the serial interfaces cannot be on the same subnet. Turn on CEF using ip cef

RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread McCallum, Robert
I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;- -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers??

Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread Andrew Smith
On 29-Jan-2002, John Jones wrote: I have a configuration question. I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) Would I run into

Re: using BGP private AS [7:33595]

2002-01-29 Thread Peter van Oene
Why not simply prevent your customer routes from entering your IGP by the normal means? Is there some relationship from BGP to the IGP in your network that we may not be aware of? Pete At 02:57 PM 1/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: Hi, Everyone: I saw some examples to use BGP private AS for

RE: RE: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511]

2002-01-29 Thread John Neiberger
That makes sense except for the fact that the telnet protocol is *not* running on the console link! It's called reverse telnet but that doesn't describe the protocol that is actually on the link itself. That's why it's curious to me why I would have to permit telnet for it to work. I blame

SolarWinds [7:33606]

2002-01-29 Thread Richard Tufaro
Anyone have any experience with solar winds Orion, software for monitoring the WAN/LAN? Also anyone have a suggestion for an enterprise LAN/WAN alert monitoring software solution? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33606t=33606

RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread Wright, Jeremy
no mouse?? :) -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could hazzard a

Re: Cache Engine [7:33442]

2002-01-29 Thread Joseba Izaga
Thanks. Right now is working so good. Regards, Joseba Izaga - Original Message - From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos To: Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:07 AM Subject: RE: Cache Engine [7:33442] You should configure in the global configuration of the 7204: 7204(config)#ip wccp

RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread Hire, Ejay
Actually, your t-1's will probably not be in the same subnet. They will probably have a /30 for each link. Additionally, you may consider adding no ip route-cache to each t1 interface. This will allow per-packet load balancing instead of per destination. New Config... 00 interface

RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread Hire, Ejay
I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to the cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. -Ejay -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread Hartnell, George
Would this not also be a function of just what the ISP has/wants on the far end? My hookup uses a 3Com Accessbuilder 6100 I-Mux --- HSSI---Cisco 7200. The three T1's are inverse multiplexed on the 3Com. Scaleable to 7 T1's. 'Couse this is a 'Cisco' newsgroup Best, G. -Original

Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread MADMAN
Fix your addressing, enable CEF and your set. If you like you can to per packet or per destination load sharing via CEF with the appropriate interface commands. Of coarse you can mess things up and encapsulate your serial interface PPP and use PPP multilink... Dave John Jones wrote: I

Re: Lab Kit.... [7:33412]

2002-01-29 Thread Colin
Hi What would anybody suggest for a CCNP Lab? I am currently putting together a list of equipment to purchase for my CCNP lab and have come up with the following: Cat 5000 with a Sup I card (would I need a Sup II for ISL) Cat 2912 (would a Cat 1900 work.) 2501

Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread James Willard
Right, the remote router must also have ip cef capability. The cisco equipment was assumed since this is a Cisco group :). In case of no Cisco equipment on the far end, you can always just use static default routes as a previous post suggested. It will, however, not give you true load balancing.

Re: SolarWinds [7:33606]

2002-01-29 Thread sam sneed
As far as alertign software there's alot of free stuff for UNIX, big brother is probably the most used. It is a bitch to configure though if you ask me. I took the easy way out and bought servers alive for $99. It works on NT/2000 and is easy to confiure and customizable. Try it out, you can

Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]

2002-01-29 Thread Steven A. Ridder
You still did gts and not FRTS. You should specify frts out with CIR, mincir, bc, etc. For inbound interface, I still recommend CAR. Joseba Izaga wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... OK... I tested everything. I am using FRTS instead of GTS. The config i am using

Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread MADMAN
The far router needs no concept of CEF to receive the packets equally over the three T1's though it would be preferred that the ISP router also load balance since most customers Internet connections receive more than they send. Dave James Willard wrote: Right, the remote router must also

Re: SolarWinds [7:33606]

2002-01-29 Thread Jeff D
What's Up Gold rocks. If you've got the loot, you can integrate WebNM (they use mrtg) which is even cooler. We use this at work, and I love it. Check out www.somix.com and www.ipswitch.com These are much cheaper solutions than alot of the stuff out there (hp openview/tivoli) Jeff \ Richard

Looking for V.35 Cables [7:33619]

2002-01-29 Thread Kwame
Looking for a couple of V.35 Cables for back to back router connection from a 7513 to 2511. Anyone? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33619t=33619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

ls1010 switch [7:33620]

2002-01-29 Thread george gittins
Im trying to configure video to be pass through my ls1010 switch into a accord mcu unit is their a special interface i need to get ...they told me a ces ciruit? also what command would help me know what type of interface processor i =have and the amount of flash and ram thanks Message Posted

Re: SolarWinds [7:33606]

2002-01-29 Thread Robert
We use Solar Winds Pro Plus and it is great. Easy to configure. It is a pretty complete set of tools. Richard Tufaro wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anyone have any experience with solar winds Orion, software for monitoring the WAN/LAN? Also anyone have a

RE: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589]

2002-01-29 Thread Dante Martins
How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from 10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252). I have tried using telnet command: telnet 10.128.128.0 255.255.255.0 inside but still no working. Can you help me? Dante CONF MAIN PIX PIX Version 6.0(1) nameif ethernet0 outside security0

Re: Lab Kit.... [7:33412]

2002-01-29 Thread Kwame
Brad, How much does this bundle go for? I sent you a direct reply but it bounced back. Brad Ellis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Joe, Here's what I typically sell/recommend for a minumum CCIE kit: 2x 2501s 2x 2503s (for ISDN) 1x 2511

RE: Cisco Works 2000 amp;amp; Cisco Works for Win [7:33321]

2002-01-29 Thread Stull, Cory
There is an eval copy of CiscoWorks for Windows if you have a CCO login. I agree with John though its not worth the money. -Original Message- From: John Kaberna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Works 2000 amp;

Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread c1sc0k1d
I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. Hire, Ejay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next

RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]

2002-01-29 Thread Louie Belt
You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of c1sc0k1d Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I saw my gear in RTP as

RE: RE: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511]

2002-01-29 Thread Baety Wayne A1C 18 CS/SCBX
On Cisco routers, the asynchronous ports by default are set to send traffic with the TxD (transmit data) pin when activated by a protocol. As soon as input is received on the RxD (receive data) pin, the router engages an Exec process. I only said this to get a point of reference going. This is

RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]

2002-01-29 Thread John Jones
Thanks for the help. I was actually looking into CEF, but I was unsure about using it. Thanks again. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33626t=33599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: ls1010 switch [7:33620]

2002-01-29 Thread Daniel Cotts
CES = circuit emulation. IIRC It emulates a voice T-1 without compression. There is a 4 port CES T1 PAM for the LS1010. There are/were various CES cards for the 7200. They were double width. One side had an ATM interface OC-3 or DS-3, the other four T-1 CES ports. Are you asking which ASP card

which reference book is better? [7:33629]

2002-01-29 Thread Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
Hi.. I am going for the support 2.0 exam. There are two reference books for the exam 1) CCNP Support exam certification guide and 2) Cisco Internetwork Troubleshooting. Which one is better? If I only study CCNP support exam certification guide, is it enough?

RE: is it possible to bridge accross a tunnel? [7:33567]

2002-01-29 Thread Jason
Is this something you just want to do for the sake of doing? If so, I say have at it. Will it work, don't know. I have never tried it. If you are looking to do this to fulfill a production requirement I would question why you weren't looking at using DLSW? Jason -Original Message-

  1   2   >