is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling like hotcakes.
I guess you get what you pay for.
and did you hear the latest news, Cisco's lead on their MPLS design no longer works
for Cisco. Guess who he works for now? You're right, Yakov Rekhter now works for
Junip
At 10:17 AM 12/15/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling
> like hotcakes.
And how about Juniper stock!? &;-)
>I guess you get what you pay for.
>and did you hear the latest news, Cisco's lead on their MPLS design no
>longer works
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> At 10:17 AM 12/15/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling
> > like hotcakes.
>
> And how about Juniper stock!? &;-)
Like most tech stocks, they have recently slumped.
but let's look at the numbe
Sunday, December 17, 2000 6:07 PM
To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Juniper
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> At 10:17 AM 12/15/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling
> > like hotcakes.
>
Look at the financials... They say something totally different...
-Eddie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Nguyen
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 12:07 PM
To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Juniper
Priscilla
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Eddie Parra
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 12:56 PM
To: Mark Nguyen; Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Juniper
Look at the financials... They say something totally different...
-Eddie
-Original
Title: Juniper
Foot print is the overall physical size of the
router. As to whether they're good or not, I have no clue. Never worked with any
other routers than Cisco. But then, I've only worked with 2 routers up to
now...
Mathieu Nantel, ccna, cne, mcp
- Original Message -
F
> Nova Rich wrote:
> I'm told that it's faster, cheaper and has a smaller foot print?
> What's a foot print? Is it really better then Cisco?
>
The footprint is the size/space it takes up - these routers are
physically smaller than their cisco equivelents so you can fit more of
them in a rack.
A footprint is the amount of floor space the device takes up. Smaller is
often better, especially in a crowded lab or service bureau.
As to which is better, that depends on what criteria you are applying.
Generally speaking, Juniper equipment is considered to be comparable to and
in some ca
Title: Juniper
Footprint is the physical dimension ie how much
rack/desk space it needs.
(ex:
if it is 19"Wx10"DX4"H vs 19"Wx8" Dx 4"H; then the 2nd box has smaller
"footprint")
HTH
H.vu
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nova Ri
Title: Juniper
I heard the Juniper is optimized for the Core
whereas Cisco excels in Core, Distribution and Access.
Should we not all be designing IOS-to-IOS solutions
for our clients considering the ROI with Cisco Gear?
OTOH, as in the case in client-server ... Novell
optimized for File and
Juniper devices are ok to work with. The hardest thing to get used to is
the fact that JunOS is BSD by any other name.
Configuration is essentially pretty easy.
Of course, coming from a cisco world, I originally feared Juniper boxes,
but now I don't mind them so much.
--phil
On Thu, 28 Se
Title: Juniper
Why
are they generating so much excitement? Because they route IP REALLY, REALLY
fast and that there are several refugees from Cisco, including some who used to
write code for the IOS employed by them. This doesn't necessarily make
them better, but I would imagine that cost+r
Actually, Juniper only makes high-speed routers (competitive to the Cisco
12000 series, but better). I don't think they make ATM switches
either. For more info, check out their website. www.juniper.net
I'm happy to say that I bought some of their stock back in May for
$73/share...hehehe
Io
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Phillip Heller
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:59 PM
To: Mathieu Nantel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Juniper
Juniper devices are ok to work with. The hardest thing to get used to i
Actually, after reviewing their product offering, they don't have access
devices covered all that well. At the bottom of the spectrum, they offer
the M5 router, which may be suitable as an access device for a regional
ISP. I'd guess it's intended to compete with the cisco 3600 series.
--phil
O
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Juniper
>Actually, Juniper only makes high-speed routers (competitive to the Cisco
>12000 series, but better). I don't think t
half Of
Phillip Heller
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:59 PM
To: Mathieu Nantel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Juniper
Juniper devices are ok to work with. The hardest thing to get used to is
the fact that JunOS is BSD by any other name.
Confi
I am with Casey on this one.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Casey Fahey
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Juniper
>
>
>
> A footprin
;Casey Fahey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: Juniper
> As a side note, it seems that Juniper's success seems to lie within their
> ASICS. I'm not positive, but I believe this of
...
Have a good weekend,
Casey
>From: Iohan Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Iohan Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Casey Fahey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Juniper
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 20:
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of
> Phillip Heller
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:59 PM
> To: Mathieu Nantel
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Juniper
>
> Juniper devices are ok to work with. T
t;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> > Of
> > Phillip Heller
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:59 PM
> > To: Mathieu Nantel
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Juniper
>
sday, September 28, 2000 11:57 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Juniper
Absolutely. The Juniper M20, M40, and M160 Internet Backbone Routers
are sometimes chosen instead of the Cisco 12000 Series. Press reports
say that Juniper has gained some of the market share at
ve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Juniper
Cisco bought a company called Cerent several months back. I was given a tour
of a Nextlink ( now X0, after their purchase of Concentric ) pop recently.
Full of Cerent stuff, and the engineer there waxed on and on about how great
it was. All fiber connection
y multiple OC3 and higher? Correct?
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > Phillip Heller
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:5
I would determine what your goal is first, then find
the best product for that piece of the network. Now,
best product to many means many things. I'm not into
sales and I don't care who makes the box. I look at
features/performance/interoperability/vendor support
capability/good box for the buck,
Title: Juniper
Juniper
products are much faster and cute. Look like your company is in right
direction. Note... routing and session concept is going to go when optical
products available. Cisco do not have time to figure out new
technology...know only buying companies and making CCIE’s.
Ma
Like everything else, When it's new everyone wants a piece, can you talk
to anyone who has used it for at least 5 years, I doubt it.
Whoever is placing the future of their company on this brand new technology
better think twice.
If you are smart, you better have an ole reliable Cisco box sitting
.
Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Leon BassSent: Monday, October 02, 2000 4:27
PMTo: MRCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: Juniper
Like
everything else, When it's new everyone wants a piece, can you talk to anyone
who has used it for at le
ginal Message -
From:
Leon Bass
To: MR
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 9:26
PM
Subject: Re: Juniper
Like everything else, When it's new everyone wants a piece, can
you talk to anyone who has used it for at least 5 years, I doubt it.
Whoever
is that there will be enough out there
> for all. as someone
> said, be prepared to work with all.
>
>
> m
> .
>
>
>
> Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leon
> Bass
> Sent: Monday, October
?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Shahid Muhammad Shafi
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 5:28 PM
> To: Jean Stockton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Juniper
>
>
> to me its same like microsoft
31879a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Shahid Muhammad Shafi
> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 5:28 PM
> > To: Jean Stockton
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Leon Bass wrote:
> Like everything else, When it's new everyone wants a piece, can you talk
> to anyone who has used it for at least 5 years, I doubt it.
> Whoever is placing the future of their company on this brand new
> technology better think twice.
FUD. Many many backb
: Monday, October 02, 2000 2:31 PMTo: Leon
Bass; MRCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
Juniper
juniper stock
are out performing cisco at this time - sure cisco does a lot of
acquisitions. 206 pr sh vs 55.5 pr sh is a
significant difference. my good guess is that there will be enough
I think you are incorrect! MCI WorldCom is scheduled to deploy some of the
edge stuff soon. It is not in the core yet!!
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Leon Bass wrote:
>
> > Like everything else, When it's new ever
>I could not figured out why Juniper does not allow us to get access to the
>documentation of their OS, we can only read the old version, but no way to
>get the documnetation of the new version, do they want to people to learn it
>and use it or what?
>Unless there is some other reasons, this is so
gt; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Shahid Muhammad Shafi
> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 5:28 PM
> > To: Jean Stockton
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Juniper
> >
> >
> > to me its same like microsoft to
losing 25% of all your
ports.
Nova
Rich
-Original Message-From: hal9001
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 6:20
PMTo: Leon Bass; MRCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Juniper
The people I work with rave about Extreme anyone
got good opinions about this
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Chris Gore wrote:
> I think you are incorrect! MCI WorldCom is scheduled to deploy some of the
> edge stuff soon. It is not in the core yet!!
Cable & Wireless USA, Frontier Global Center, MCI WorldCom's vBNS,
UUNET and Verio are all using Juniper routers at places in their ne
al Message-
From: Casey Fahey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Juniper
A footprint is the amount of floor space the device takes up. Smaller is
often better, especially in a crowded lab or service bur
7;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Juniper
>Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:40:12 +0530
>
>Wait a minute, I had a different understanding of "foot print" in software.
>Foot print in software is the size of the image to be loaded. A
have u tried www.juniper.com?
Babar Hameed
Network Engineer
Unisys Pakistan.
-Original Message-
From: "Erwin Novriyanto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:07:27 +0700
Subject: Juniper switch
> Does any one know about web address for junip
To: Erwin Novriyanto; Cisco
Subject: Re: Juniper switch
have u tried www.juniper.com?
Babar Hameed
Network Engineer
Unisys Pakistan.
-Original Message-
From: "Erwin Novriyanto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000
s such information or opinion has been confirmed in
writing by an authorised WESTCON director.
-Original Message-
From: Babar Hameed [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:11 AM
To: Erwin Novriyanto; Cisco
S
Core layer. thanks for inform me.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Chris Nwanonyiri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:08 PM
To: Babar Hameed; Erwin Novriyanto; Cisco
Subject: Re: Juniper switch
Here is the Url for Juniper products
http://juniper.net/products
TECTED]]
> Êè§àÁ×èÍ: 13 ¸Ñ¹ÇÒ¤Á 2543 15:22
> ¶Ö§: Babar Hameed; Cisco
> àÃ×èͧ: RE: Juniper switch
>
> thanks for your info,..i guess the address is www.juniper.com its banking
> corp. ..:)
> i am looking forward for sales representative in Indonesia but,..they onl
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Nwanonyiri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:08 PM
>To: Babar Hameed; Erwin Novriyanto; Cisco
>Subject: Re: Juniper switch
>
>
>Here is the Url for Juniper products
>http://juniper.net/products/
It's http://www.juniper.net. Juniper couldn't get the juniper.com people to
give up their domain name.
Priscilla
At 01:10 PM 12/13/00, Babar Hameed wrote:
>have u tried www.juniper.com?
>
>Babar Hameed
>Network Engineer
>Unisys Pakistan.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: "Erwin Novriy
http://www.juniper.net/products/ is a good starting point.
jas
At 03:13 PM 1/31/01 +, RLohiya wrote:
>Hi Guys, slightly off topic,
>
>I need information on Juniper Core Routers.
>
>Any web links would be appreciated.
>
>Thanx
>
>Rashid
_
FAQ, list archives, a
please check it out, I think it ll help u. http://www.juniper.net/products/
Kindest Regards
Muhammad Zahid
RLohiya wrote:
> Hi Guys, slightly off topic,
>
> I need information on Juniper Core Routers.
>
> Any web links would be appreciated.
>
> Thanx
>
> Rashid
>
> _
>From what I understand from people who work with large scale providers,
Juniper is stronger in the Backbone. I believe Cisco is probably still the
best for overall Enterprise products.
Heather Buri
-Original Message-
From: cslx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001
>"cslx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
>it is said that the core technology of juniper is better than cisco now,it
>that true?
If you mean technology for provider-level core routers, Juniper
certainly is a strong competitor, and others may enter that space as
well. Juniper's products don't nec
For our company, Cisco does not yet provide reliable
products that scale to OC192 and beyond. Juniper
easily handles this for our backbone interfaces. I
don't work with it directly myself, but that's what
the higher-up engineers have told our group. :>
--- "Buri, Heather H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Check out Cisco's optical VSR technology.
/n
cslx wrote:
> it is said that the core technology of juniper is better than cisco now,it
> that true?
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and
Juniper v. Cisco
Juniper seems to be a serious player in the carrier core, IP-only arena.
Companies like Worldcom really like the wirespeed Gigabit/Terabit switching
fabric. On the other hand, Cisco has a strong grasp (and market share) in
the Enterprise arena. For my $.02 worth, they provide t
How long has this been deployed?
>Check out Cisco's optical VSR technology.
>
>/n
>
>cslx wrote:
>
>> it is said that the core technology of juniper is better than cisco now,it
> > that true?
>>
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.
, performance, and
scalability...that's why it took them a bit longer. I guess it's worth the
wait.
-Original Message-
From: Dan West
To: Buri, Heather H; 'cslx'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 2/26/2001 8:06 AM
Subject: RE: juniper and cisco
For our company, Cisco do
; wait.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Dan West
> To: Buri, Heather H; 'cslx'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Sent: 2/26/2001 8:06 AM
> Subject: RE: juniper and cisco
>
> For our company, Cisco does not yet provide reliable
> products that scale
Roger,
I assume your talking about the 7200 OSR? (announced officially
on Feb. 20th)
I'll admit that I haven't worked with the 7200 OSR, or with any of
Junipers routers for that matter, but what is the basis for your
comment that it "performs and scales better than Junipers routers"?
Is this
It seems from talking to both Juniper and Cisco sales reps that
Cisco's strategy is:
bash, bash, bash Juniper...
Juniper's strategy is:
here are our products and let me show you want it can do...
I personally prefer Juniper's approach.
Also I recently talked to this guy at a conference (Ch
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: juniper and cisco
Roger,
I assume your talking about the 7200 OSR? (announced officially
on Feb. 20th)
I'll admit that I haven't worked with the 7200 OSR, or with any of
Junipers routers for that matter, but what is the basis for yo
I guess it's worth the
>wait.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan West
>To: Buri, Heather H; 'cslx'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Sent: 2/26/2001 8:06 AM
>Subject: RE: juniper and cisco
>
>For our company, Cisco does not yet provide reliable
>prod
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:11:15PM -0800, Net Bum wrote:
>It seems from talking to both Juniper and Cisco sales reps that
>
>Cisco's strategy is:
> bash, bash, bash Juniper...
Yep, same goes for their take on Foundry, Extreme, and on and on.
I get chills when I think how similar cisco is to Mic
Uh yea, There both very successful. Its very easy to bash the leader, but
it is much harder to be one.
"anthony kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:11:15PM -0800, Net Bum wrote:
> >It seems from talking to both
nce, and
> > scalability...that's why it took them a bit longer.
> > I guess it's worth the
> > wait.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan West
> > To: Buri, Heather H; 'cslx'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Sent: 2/26
Here are some interesting links
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_022201.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/12000/12416/prodlit/itro_ds.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/ifaa/oc192/prodlit/cc19_ds.htm
The thing is, Juniper's technology is based upon a central bus a
It depends on what you mean by 'better'.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cslx
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: juniper and cisco
it is said that the core technology of juniper is better than cisco no
I have resisted the temptation to get involved in this, but since it's already
being discussed some, I've got a question:
"Net Bum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a Cisco 2600 series on my side and I asked him what he had on
> his side. He said (as if I wouldn't know :-), "A big router, it'
Roger (I am assuming the same Roger from Securabyte Group),
>I've seen many tests as where the Juniper routers experience a lot of
>packet
>loss and a decrease in performance and reliability when the node is fully
>configured with a complete set of cards. Each time a card is removed or
>added,
I have heard of similar issues with foundry routers, but it was second hand.
-- Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "W. Alan Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: juniper and cisco
> I have r
"W. Alan Robertson" wrote:
>This is not the first time I've heard this; major ISPs utilizing Juniper in
>parts of their core, but always using Cisco at the edge.
Perhaps as ISPs expand, they migrate their existing boxes to the edge. Just
as their old 7500's moved to the edge when the 12000's ca
I've been reading this thread and have been resisting
to reply but am now. This thread comes up every now
and then.
The bottom line is all vendors have their issues and
software problems. No single vendor is perfect. It's
like a catchup game in a way. Someone comes out with
something first then t
>Here are some interesting links
>
>
>http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_022201.html
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/12000/12416/prodlit/itro_ds.htm
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/ifaa/oc192/prodlit/cc19_ds.htm
>
>
>The thing is, Juniper's technology is based upon a ce
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
> >The thing is, Juniper's technology is based upon a central bus architecture
>
> shared memory, not shared bus. There is a difference. I don't
> have the URL handy, but Cisco has a paper out by the Stanford
> University professor who architected the GSR.
> shared memory, not shared bus. There is a difference. I don't
>have the URL handy, but Cisco has a paper out by the Stanford
>University professor who architected the GSR. It does a nice
>comparison of the three basic architectures, shared bus, shared
>memory, and crossbar. Shared bus r
>
>
>Is anyone on the list familiar with a problem with Juniper's BGP
>implementation
>when peering with other vendors?
An observation or two. The authors of the BGP-4 specification are
Tony Li and Yakov Rekhter. Tony was the principal programmer of the
Cisco code, as well as the Juniper cod
What do u mean by "set history"?
In fact CLI environment is actually have its history. And accoring the
reference it should be in the CLI environmnet setting while in fact I
found nothing about the setting.
Try use "show cli history" to get the history.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:21:58 -0500
"Stanz
I just found it curious. If you look at these market leaders, you'll
find an eerie similarity in how their product lines incorporate
technology acquisition. The ability to subsume heterogeneous
technologies may indicate why these two have done so well (and one
might argue, the fear of dethronement
>All,
>
>Any of you ever had luck on porting Juniper to a FreeBSD box?
>I heard that you could download the Junos and then tweak the BSD so that
>make it just like the real box. I know Olive, but I guess that is something
>else, although anybody can give me or tell me how to get a copy of Olive
>w
The Olive is simply the JunOS code running on a compatible PC.
If you've got the JunOS package, make the LS120 image, get an intel based
pc with an LS120 drive. The image should just boot.
Regards,
--phil
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, KY wrote:
All,
Any of you ever had luck on porting Junipe
Phil,
Thanks for the infor.
I am trying to download the JunOS from our internal company website. I just
want to verify if I will have to make it LS120 image. As I don't have LS120
handy, but I do have some spare hard drives. I wonder if it can boot from
LS120, should it be bootable from normal ha
Did anybody ever got this working ? I would like to know your experience.
Thks.
""KY"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Phil,
>
> Thanks for the infor.
> I am trying to download the JunOS from our internal company website. I
just
> want to verify if I will have to
Use show command in juniper which is equivalent to show run and u can use
the monitor command in junos to monitor the ICMP packet.
Thanks and warm regards.
Muhammad Tariq
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marc-Andre Giroux
Sent: Monday, May
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Juniper technical question [7:4398]
Use show command in juniper which is equivalent to show run and u can use
the monitor command in junos to monitor the ICMP packet.
Thanks and warm regards.
Muhammad Tariq
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
inline
Stefano
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc-Andre Giroux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: lunedl 14 maggio 2001 14.19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Juniper technical question [7:4398]
>
>
> 2 questions the first is what is the equivalent of a "show run" in the
> Junos worl
show run = show configuration
debug packet icmp = monitor
Good luck
Sean
"Juniper makes Cisco looks like child's play"
>From: "Marc-Andre Giroux" >Reply-To: "Marc-Andre Giroux" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Juniper technical question [7:4398] >Date:
Mon, 14 May 2001 08:19:19 -0400 > >2
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marc-Andre Giroux
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Juniper technical question [7:4398]
the run monitor command will let me see the number of packets sent thru the
interfaes but I am trying to debug the icmp packets. As for
I don't get where the "bitter" in the competition comes from. That's
business. The major difference between Cisco and Microsoft is what is done
with the aqusitions afterwards. Microsoft uses the "you will be assimilated"
strategy, changing the ways that the bought companies work to conform to
Micr
BTW, I love the monikers on this list.
Anyhow, my impression comes from sales in our discussion of relative
merits of Foundry and Extreme's offerings. Instead of offering insight, I
was deluged with FUD. What I was looking for was why an end-to-end cisco
solution was a better fit.
YMMV, of cours
JunOS is only intended for use with Juniper routers. The olive was a
testing device that has long since been retired and is not supported in any
sense by Juniper.
Peter
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 5/18/2001 at 4:55 AM Valeri Marinski wrote:
>Hi Group!
>People are talking pret
Peter,
People looking for Olive donot expect any support from Juniper in any sense.
I remember some guys on the list use LS120 on FreeBSD to boot JunOS, I never
tried it myself.
KY
""Peter Van Oene"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JunOS is only intended for use
nd
jkernel version 4.4 on
Olive by upgrading the kernel and base. Since the newbies are learning
on their own, you
don't have to worry about us bothering Juniper (or yourself) for
support.
Just my .02c.
Sean
>From: "Peter Van Oene" >Reply-To: "Peter Van Oene" >To:
n you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their
shoes.
- Original Message -
From: "KY"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Juniper CERTS and Olive [7:4957]
> Peter,
>
> People looking for Olive donot expect any support from Junip
Adam,
Earlier this year I asked Juniper directly whether they had plans to make
the olive software readily available. Below is the response I received:
No, we are not. The olive software load was originally intended for
testing the
software before we had the hardware up and running. It
My opinion is that you will have to devote all you time for study to pass
either exam. I don't think it is a choice of both - but either/or. Talk to
you Supervisor. Ask if you are more valuable to Juniper as a CCIE who can
integrate Juniper with Cisco. If so, go for the CCIE lab. If not,
concentra
APRIL FOOLS GUYS!!! =0)
B Rudy wrote:
>
> JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY
> WILL EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS
>
>
> RUDY B
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40058&t=40056
---
April Fools!!
>From: "B Rudy"
>Reply-To: "B Rudy"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056]
>Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:27:28 -0500
>
>JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL
>EVENTUALLY BE CALLED JUNICO!!! PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS
>
>
>
perhaps a better name would be "cissi-fer"( sissy fur )
anyone any good at anagrams. maybe among the combined letter of cisco and
juniper there is some good pun or other.
""B Rudy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SY
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
