I can't remember whether the 2502 needs a media filter.
What type of physical port is the cable attaching to:
1. nine pin female
2. rj-45
Are the HP mau's active (do they have external power) or
are they passive?
I suspect that you are using passive hubs, and the phantom
voltage from the NIC's i
The HP maus are active mau and my routers are connected via media filters. Since I am
using active devices so I wonder why the length limitation is too short. Any
suggestion?
For your question, it is simply I got three 2502 and 2 maus.
regards,
Fanglo
Ray Mosely wrote:
> I can't remember wheth
Try it.
>From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: token ring question
>Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0600 (CST)
>
>
>
>Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2
>2502's into a MAU can I set different rings
TECTED]
Subject: Re: token ring question
Try it.
>From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: token ring question
>Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0600 (CST)
>
>
>
>Can you configure multiple rings o
yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau.
You can't mix ring speeds however.
daveh
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: token ring question
Can you configur
ng.
Brian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: token ring question
>
>
> Try it.
>
>
> >From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon.
-Original Message-
From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM
To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: token ring question
yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges
uter interfaces with
different network addresses and put them into different bridge groups why
would that be a problem.
daveh
-Original Message-
From: NP-BASS LEON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:43 PM
To: 'Hennen, David'; 'Brian'; [EMAIL PRO
>
> >To: "'Hennen, David'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"'Brian'"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: token ring question
> >Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:42:38 -0500
> >
> >HOW
&
ould really like to know this one.
>If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU
>looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place
>two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same
>segment??? IP
the trade.
-Original Message-
From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:56 PM
To: NP-BASS LEON; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: token ring question
I have seen two ip ranges running on a single IBM 8228 mau (you can't get
much dumber than that)
gt;Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM
>To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: token ring question
>
>
>yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau.
>You can't mix ring speeds however.
>
>daveh
>
>-Origin
Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: token ring question
At 01:42 PM 11/9/00, NP-BASS LEON wrote:
>HOW
>I would really like to know this one.
>If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a
gt;From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: token ring question
>
>
>At 01:42 PM 11/9/00, NP-BASS LEON wrote:
> >HOW
> >I would really like to know this one.
&
I'm about to cause problemsa debate or something
Something way back in my memory says it is possible to break one MAU into
two physical rings. The real problem is that you have to voltage on a port
to charge and open a port's bypass relay. If my memory is correct, you make
two crossover
Thanks for the research, Jim. Jim has shown that when a router attempts to
insert into a ring (MAU) with a different ring number than an
already-inserted router, it doesn't work. The second router fails to insert
into the ring. Here's what happens, assuming you don't use Rodgers Moore's
creati
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM
>To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: token ring question
>
>
>yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau.
>You can't mix ring speeds however.
>
>daveh
&g
Both routers have the same ring speed?
Verify the cables. Verify the MAU. Divide a problem into smaller parts. Then
test each part. Substitute a questionable item for a known good item. If the
new arrangement now fails the questionable item is defective. Conversely if
the new arrangement works the
l Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:45 AM
To: 'Vincent'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Token Ring Question
Both routers have the same ring speed?
Verify the cables. Verify the MAU. Divide a problem into smaller parts. Then
test each part. Substitute a ques
check ring speed
Vincent wrote:
> For I am not familiar with TokenRing. I just wondering how come i insert 2
> router into the token ring hub,
> one of the interface is up/down all the time.
>
> Thanks
> Vincent
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h
Let me ask you this. Are the interfaces of equal cost? Do you want routing loops? What
prevents routing loops, and how are loops prevented?
Scott
Vincent wrote:
> For I am not familiar with TokenRing. I just wondering how come i insert 2
> router into the token ring hub,
> one of the interface
I am very new at this but I do not see your 'no shut' command.
Makeeda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Matt Shell
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Token ring question
I have two 2502s plugged into an
Either your mau is bad or your type 1 is bad or you token ring port is bad
on your router.
Since your router doesn't show the token ring port in reset, your router
port isn't bad. That leaves the other 2. You might also try to set the
port speed to 4 instead of 16
Good luck
--
Rich Russell
ww
Since you have 2 sets of router and token-ring 9-pin-type1 cable it should
be easy to troubleshoot this problem..i would suggest you to try this...
1.. Connect only one router to the MAU. Check if token-ring port inserts
into the ring. I ask you to do this because if the other cable is bad it
will
: RE: Token ring question
I am very new at this but I do not see your 'no shut' command.
Makeeda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Matt Shell
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Token ring questio
Or perhaps the TR port is not initialized in the MAU? There is a gizmo that
contains a battery that will do that.
Bert
Rich Russell wrote:
> Either your mau is bad or your type 1 is bad or you token ring port is bad
> on your router.
>
> Since your router doesn't show the token ring port in re
You might just have a bad MAU. Granted, the 8228 is
passive, so this may not be the case. Have you tried
to plug each of them in one at a time? If they both
fail, get another MAU (Known working). The chance that
you have 2 bad 2503s is slim, unless they came from
the same place. Hope this helps.
are you sure about the ring speed?
Ruud
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Andrew Lennon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: zaterdag 10 juni 2000 9:05
Aan: 'm. jean stockton'; 'Matt Shell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: Token ring question
knackered media/mau,
Don't you hate it when your trying to set up a Layer 3 scenario, but you get
stuck troubleshooting Layer 2 problems!?!?!?!
Thanks to everyone who posted and emailed suggestions. Everything is
working now. Some info that I probably should have included in the first
post was that I was plugged in
the bad tag off and plugged into a working port.
Ray M.
CCNA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Matt Shell
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Token ring question - Solved!
Don't you hate it when your
Ports 1 and 8 on a MAU are reserved for ring in and ring out for daisy
chaining MAU's. You cannot use them for stations.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Token ring question - S
hy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: David B McGlumphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Shell'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Token ring question - Solved!
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:19:55 -0400
Ports 1 and 8 on a MAU are reserved for ring in an
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dale Cantrell
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 6:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Token ring question - Solved!
I'm gonna have to disagree with that statement. At least in part. The MAU
that I have, STAR-TEK, ( I can't even find out h
"Dale Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm gonna have to disagree with that statement. At least in part. The MAU
> that I have, STAR-TEK, ( I can't even find out how old it is, no Url.)
> 828AT, has 1-8 ports and a Ri and a Ro also. Tell me if yours is
> the same way?
We have to qualify th
""Edward Solomon"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8jabbo$1uf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8jabbo$1uf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Dale Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm gonna have to disagree with that statement. At least in part. The
MAU
> > that I have, STAR-TEK, ( I can't even find out
Hi Ivan,
Mac addresses only have local significance. So for your scenario, host X
sends a packet with it's own MAC address as the source and the router TR
interface as the destination MAC address. The router then rebuilds the
packet and sends it out the ethernet interface with the Ethernet interf
This is achieved by bit swapping. I do not know the complete ins and outs of
it but I has attached a URL which is a bit swapping tool which can be used
to verify translation.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bitswap/bitswap.pl
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=
He said the router is acting as a translation (sic) bridge. So the router
(bridge) address does not come into play. The router (bridge) translates
the non-canonical TR address to a canonical Ethernet address. The bridge
reverses the bits in each byte of the address.
We have had many discussion
At 07:25 AM 5/23/02, Ivan wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have a interest question, doesn't any one know the answer?
>
>A router is being used as a translation bridge between a Token Ring network
>and an Ethernet network. Host X on the Token ring sends a packet to Host Y
>on the Ethernet. The soursce MAC add
I just noticed that I misplaced the functional/non-functional bit. I hate
that! ;-)
The functional/non-functional bit is the most significant bit of the 3rd
byte (not the least significant bit of the 2nd byte as I said before.)
So, the address is:
4000.a089.0002
0100 1010 ..
This is correct if the router is acting as a router but when the router
is bridging, this is no longer true.
To answer your question, Ivan, you would simply perform bitswapping on the
TR MAC to find the ethernet equivalent.
There were a series of posts on this topic (some by me) that specif
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If this seems mysterious or difficult to apply in a generic fashion to any
> hex representation of a byte, then it's not time yet to go for CCIE.
Thank you for verifying my feelings about this. As you may, o
Ivan,
Take a look at the subject (CCIE written question)
that Dennis responded to on May 20.
He is a great source for this group.
Thanks
Reza
""Ivan"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I have a interest question, doesn't any one know the answer?
>
>
I'm with you 100% on this. I said that bit swapping is as easy as writing
your name backwards. Maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, so to speak,
because you do have to do hex to binary and back, but only for a four-digit
binary number. So it's as easy as writing your name backwards in Pig Lat
uot;
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Token ring Question. [7:44805]
Is this part of a business decision process?:
At 07:25 AM 5/23/02, Ivan wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have a interest question, doesn't any one know the answer?
>
>A route
spond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:Re: Token ring Question. [7:44805]
>Is this part of a business decision process?:
>
>
>At 07:25 AM 5/23/02, Ivan wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I ha
-
From: "Reza Sharifi"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Token ring Question. [7:44805]
> Ivan,
>
> Take a look at the subject (CCIE written question)
> that Dennis responded to on May 20.
>
> He is a great source for this group.
>
> Than
you can do transparent bridging between Token Ring and Ethernet. It
requires a Translational Bridging..
See the following URL: (watch for wrap)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/mmbridge.htm
Mike W.
"2504s" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTEC
What about option D?
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 7/9/01 9:53:04 AM >>>
I am taking a practice test and one of the questions had to do with
token
ring
number. Is the "srn" tell you what the ring number is? Is that mean
source
ring number? I thought the answer would be 1. But that isn't an
option?
You are right. I missed that. the x always confuses me.
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Token ring question srn 1 bn 2 trn 100 [7:11476]
> What about option D?
>
> >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTE
At 11:53 AM 7/9/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am taking a practice test and one of the questions had to do with token
>ring
>number. Is the "srn" tell you what the ring number is? Is that mean source
>ring number? I thought the answer would be 1. But that isn't an option?
Answer D is 1. I thin
51 matches
Mail list logo
