RE: Question

I just recenlty asked Cisco this same question, and their answer is still "Not yet, but soon". -Original Message- From: Parris, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:20 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Question Has Cisco come out with a version of Cisco

RE: Question

yes http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/index.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Parris, Brian Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:20 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Question Has Cisco come out with a version of

RE: Question

If you wish you can use native PPTP tunnels in Win2K to the PIX until Cisco gets a client out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Parris, Brian Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:20 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Question Has Cisco com

Re: Question

Cannot find download from the usual download location. Can you post an URL ? ""Nathan Chessin"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > yes > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/index.htm > > -Original Message- > From:

Re: Question

It was released last week.. It is available on CCO as of Monday this week... If you have any problems getting to it, let me know... Tim ""Parris, Brian"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Has Cisco come out with a version of Cisco Secure VPN Clien

RE: Question

Title: RE: Question I believe you're talking about Network Address Translation (NAT). The basic elements involved are a pool of real IP addresses, a source list, an inside interface (usually Ethernet), and an outside interface (usually some type of WAN, e.g. serial, T1, etc.). Here i

Re: Question

NAT >From: "Question!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Question!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Question >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 05:04:57 +0800 > >How to use 10 Real IP for 100 COmputers > >How to set the router support this configuration? >Please teach me and inform me wh

Re: Question

Lots of ways, however with 100 computers the best way is to use a Network Address Translation or NAT configuration. "Question!" wrote: > > How to use 10 Real IP for 100 COmputers > > How to set the router support this configuration? > Please teach me and inform me what command I should use to

Re: Question

here is a sample config of NAT: Yours of course may vary interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 10.10.23.254 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside no cdp enable ! interface Ethernet0/1 ip address 10.10.1.5 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip proxy-arp ip nat outside n

RE: Question

does anybody know if a sweep ping over a ds3 will simulate live customer data? Lowell E. Sharrah SBC-DataComm 517-241-7059 wk 517-360-0481 pgr 517-930-1993 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html

Re: Question

How big are the buffers in question? - Original Message - From: Arun Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 12:01 PM Subject: Question > Can anybody please help in solving this problem? > > A router is connected to a T1 line which has the

RE: Question ??

Thanh, this is not an overwhelming project by any means. You have a wonderful opportunity here to learn a lot of things. So don't be afraid to challenge yourself. 1) call in a couple of different vendors and ask for recommendations. Listen to what they say. Ask questions. 2) Buy something from t

Re: Question ??

1) Get a DSL Line, or a lease line with constant connection to the internet, buy a firewall that supports VPN, Cisco Firewall, Sonicwall, Checkpoint,... 2) Setup a PDC on the main office, and Setup a BDC on each remote office. 3) Buy a SOHO VPN/firewall device for each remote office 4) Implement a

Re: Question ??

OTECTED]> To: "Thanh Nam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "CISCO@groupstudy. com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:54 PM Subject: RE: Question ?? > Thanh, this is not an overwhelming project by any means. You have a > wonderful opportunity here t

Re: Question ??

Got any liquor Duck - Original Message - From: Thanh Nam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CISCO@groupstudy. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 6:02 PM Subject: Question ?? > Dear All > I have one project. My project is descripted as below: > 1. LAN at headoffice: Has 70comp

RE: question

Title: RE: question It is a packet sent usually right before an IPX network is 'legitimately' brought offline.  This packet sets all services offered through the router (or machine) as unreachable. The other routers and listening SAP agents see this packet and update accordingly

RE: question

PROTECTED] Subject: RE: question It is a packet sent usually right before an IPX network is 'legitimately' brought offline. This packet sets all services offered through the router (or machine) as unreachable. The other routers and listening SAP agents see this packet and update a

RE: question?

Cisco CCNA Exam #640-507 Preparation Library (boxed set) Author: Wendell Odom, CCIE, Stephen McQuerry, CCNP, Kevin Downes, CCIE, Cisco Systems, Inc. SRP: $120.00 ISBN: 158705003X Pages: 2200 Pub Date: May 2000 Media: 1 CD-ROM This package contains, Internetworking Cisco Network Devices, Internet

RE: Question about Napt

Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. I'll be watching while this also has my interest. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-4/ipj_3-4_nat.html Quote: The Cisco Secure PIX Firewall series supports port address translation (PAT) with "port-level multiple

RE: Question about Napt

ROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Question about Napt >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100 > >Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. >I'll be watching while this also has my interest. > >http://www.cisco.com/war

RE: Question about Napt

If the host is using the same port for 2 different applications, wouldn't the applications get confused? Dont the applications need 2 different streams of traffic going with 2 different ports? >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Quest

RE: Question about Napt

would occur here) Transport (NAT or PAT occur here) Network DataLink Physical -Original Message- From: Fred Danson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question about Napt If the host is using the same port for 2

Re: Question about Napt

> Hi, I was reading RFC3022 about Napt last night, and I still dont >understand one thing about it. From what I understand is that Napt allows >you to use one single globally unique IP address on the WAN interface of >your router, and then a large number of local addresses inside your network

RE: Question [1:1596]

It was different than I expected. I had went through the cisco academy and therefore was used to the computer tests. I also had no experience. However, I was expecting a test similiar to the tests that I had been taking. Wrong!! This was much harder. But not exactly right either. It was n

RE: Question [1:1596]

TED]> >To: Ryan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Question [1:1596] >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:21:23 -0500 > >It was different than I expected. I had went through the cisco academy and >therefore was used to the computer tests. I also had n

RE: Question [1:1596]

Probably, but I was just replying as it was sent. Sincerely, Jenn Have a Good Day!! Jennifer Cribbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.ht

RE: Question about Napt

TECTED]> > >To: "Fred Danson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Question about Napt > >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:33:35 +0100 > > > >Hi Fred. I don't have the answers, but came across a nice NA(p)T article. > >I'll

Re: question about frame

Hi, I'm not sure how to calculate it for 4 seconds, but all the documentation and examples I've seen explain Bc (Commited burst) as bc = 1/8 / line access rate, where 1/8 is the time period for a one second period which is a common time period from my understanding. Example: line access rate: 6

Re: Question on HSRP

HSRP works at the LAN interface (or sub-interface) level. The purpose of HSRP is to provide default gateway in the event of router failure. Each router has an IP address on an interface and there is a virtual router (IP address) created between the two routers, where one is active, the other is st

Re: Question on HSRP

At 06:07 PM 3/6/01, NetEng wrote: >Does HSRP work at the interface level or is the entire router on >acvtive/stand-by? In other words, if I have two routers working in HSRP and >a link goes down somewhere down the line, will the first router know to >fail-over to the second router (with a good lin

Re: Question on HSRP

The first router would not necassarily have to lose connectivity to the second router in order to fail over. HSRP can be configured to track an additional interface. For example you could track the link to the ISP. If that link goes down the router decrements its priority (default decrease is 10

Re: Question on HSRP

You can have both of these routers running in HSRP. However, you have to enable "HSRP Interface Tracking" so that the line will fail-over to the second router. The command is in this format: Router(config-if)# standby group-number track type number interface-priority ""NetEng"" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Question on HSRP

Cool. I didn't know about this interface tracking feature. It sounds like it could meet his needs. Thanks, Priscilla At 06:59 PM 3/6/01, Clayton Price wrote: >The first router would not necassarily have to lose connectivity to the >second router in order to fail over. HSRP can be configured to

Re: Question on HSRP

Subject: Question on HSRP > Does HSRP work at the interface level or is the entire router on > acvtive/stand-by? HSRP operates at the interface level. The benefit HSRP provides is this: Let's say you have a number of Workstations or Servers on a LAN segment where more than one router exist. E

Re: Question on HSRP

I can see what you are trying to accomplish on this. You want it, so that if and when one link (WAN interface) on the router that connects to the ISP goes down for the other router to pick up HSRP tasks. Look into the track command. HSRP has an associated priority to it, the router with the hi

Re: Question on HSRP

>At 06:07 PM 3/6/01, NetEng wrote: >>Does HSRP work at the interface level or is the entire router on >>acvtive/stand-by? In other words, if I have two routers working in HSRP and >>a link goes down somewhere down the line, will the first router know to >>fail-over to the second router (with a goo

Re: Question on HSRP

Thanks to everyone for the help. My questions have been answered (for now). What I'm trying to do is; I have multiple remote offices where I want to create a VPN tunnel across one provider to the corporate office. In case that the provider goes down, I need to have the second provider take over (w

Re: Question on HSRP

One more comment, though. Tracking an additional interface may not meet his needs since he said he was hoping for a router failover in the event "a link goes down somewhere down the line." For that kind of behavior, you would need a routing protocol. Routing protocols track failures in routes,

Re: Question on HSRP

Now, this is the kind of situation the various design certs should test on! &;-) Regarding your actual question, have you considered a Layer-8 solution? Depending on who you talk to, Layer 8 deals with money, politics, planning, etc. My thinking is that you should select a provider that gives

Re: Question on HSRP

Can't this be treated as two separate issues - the HSRP and the routing. If BGP peers are set up effectively in a triangle between remote office and central site over the two links, they should be able to run independantly of HSRP. If the active router receives a packet but BGP tells it that the o

Re: Question on HSRP

I've done this configuration before. It's relatively painless. If you're using Cisco-to-Cisco equipment, you can create GRE tunnels at the endpoints and encrypt them. On the far-end, you'll have 2 tunnel interfaces, one to each central site router. If you run an IGP over the tunnels, then your

Re: Question on HSRP

layer 8 politics layer 9 finance >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Question on HSRP >Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:15:46 -0800 >Received: from [63.104.50.75] b

Re: Question regarding DLCI's...

If these are all point to point then you should have one PVC per spoke at your hub. So, Stamford should have three PVCs each with a different DLCI, obviously. Then, each remote location will have a single PVC and DLCI. Also, DLCIs are only locally significant so when you received the DLCI assig

RE: Question regarding DLCI's...

If they are doing global addressing then YES! -Original Message- From: John Gotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question regarding DLCI's... Hi all...quick question; We have 4 offices, NY, Chicago, Stamford and San=20

RE: Question regarding DLCI's...

Ah, good point. If these were global DLCIs then his assumption would be correct. That didn't occur to me since I haven't heard of anyone actually using global DLCIs. >>> "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/21/01 10:33:31 AM >>> If they are doing global addressing then YES! -Original Messag

RE: Question regarding DLCI's...

>From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "John Gotti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Question regarding DLCI's... >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:33:31 -0600 > >If they are doing global addressing then YES! &

RE: Question regarding DLCI's...

Hi all, The DLCI's are still of local significance as I understand it. When the company I belong to provide links we might use 17, 18,19 & 20 at the core site on line C12345. At remote end 1 we would most likely use DCLI 17 as the first instance on each remote site. For example, remote site

Re: Question regarding DLCI's...

If the pvc's are provisioned do a sh frame-relay pvc. You can see the built pvc before you configure. (Assuming you have the T up and encapsulated) ""John Gotti"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all...quick question; We have 4 offices, NY, Ch

Re: Question about eigrp

ing > :) > > router eigrp 64783 > network 10.0.0.0 > network 172.26.0.0 > no auto-summary > eigrp stub connected > > > > Sincerely, > > Raul F. Fernandez > -Original Message- > From: Circusnuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Raul Fer

Re: Question on Subnetting

I hate dealing with idiot customers who have to have you point out the exact RFC saying why that's wrong. You're not going to find such a thing, but rather just knowledge about what the subnet mask is for and what it does. The biggest problem you get with different masks for hosts that both fit w

Re: question in OSPF

The DR will be the master. ""xiaoyu zeng"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all: > Please help me. > situation: > Router A: Priority 1,IP address 192.168.2.1 > Router B: Priority 2,IP address 192.168.1.1 > . > In DR

Re: question in OSPF

The DR will be the master. ""xiaoyu zeng"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all: > Please help me. > situation: > Router A: Priority 1,IP address 192.168.2.1 > Router B: Priority 2,IP address 192.168.1.1 > . > In DR

Re: question in OSPF

The DR will the the master. ""xiaoyu zeng"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91v4ij$ng5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all: > Please help me. > situation: > Router A: Priority 1,IP address 192.168.2.1 > Router B: Priority 2,IP address 192.168.1.1 > . > In DR

Re: question about BCMSN!!

The forward delay is the time the port takes to transit from listen to learn or from learn to forward. fwd-delay = llisten -> learn or fwd delay = learn-->forward . default forward delay is 15 sec , which means the total time the switch spends in listening and learning is 30 s

RE: question about BCMSN!!

The correct answer to that one is 1. The Forward Delay timer is also used for the Listening Mode. Therefore, the total time a port spend in Learning and Listening Mode is Forward Delay X 2. HTH, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, M

Re: Question about eigrp

Hmmm- a couple things you have described don't seem EIGRP-like.  The network @ the office is EIGRP & stubs are usually set as passive or not set EIGRP @ all.  In both cases they're alive & can transmit thought the network, but only "a little help from their friend" (their directly connected

Re: Question about eigrp

ul F. Fernandez -Original Message-From: Circusnuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Raul Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 'Cisco group study' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, November 12, 2000 9:23 AMSubject: Re: Question about eigrp Hmmm- a couple th

RE: Question regarding DLCI's...

ne please clear this up for my understanding. Thanks in advance. -Original Message- From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:27 PM To: Steve Smith; John Gotti; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question regarding DLCI's... Hi all, The DLCI'

Re: Question [7:34497]

I guess you are behind the news. I thin Cisco have pulled them to Court to answer some questions, that was few months ago. However, I have not heard anything about the final outcome of the case. Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Kazan, Naim To: Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002

RE: question [7:12456]

Hey Christian, This is what the Cisco website says: For CCNP you have to take: - 640-503 Routing (BSCN) - 640-504 Switching (BCMSN) - 640-505 Remote Access (BCRAN) - 640-506 Support (CIT) You can also combine the first three into a single exam (usefull for cust reduction!): - 640-509 Foundation

RE: question [7:12456]

Christian The exam 640-403 (ACRC) is replaced by 640-503 Routing (BSCN) Mohammed > -Original Message- > From: Christian Rautscher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon, July 16, 2001 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: question [7:12456] > > Hi all, > > i know that for the

RE: question [7:16005]

As far as WAN goes, anything above DS3 is typically fiber (or wireless in some cases). Copper CAN support much higher speeds (at least in a LAN environment), including GigE (and, I wouldn't be surprised, 10GigE when it comes out). DS3 is coax (copper) or fiber. Mark -Original Message-

RE: question [7:16005]

T3 / DS3 is usually handed off over twin coax ( copper ). out under the street, these days, hard to tell what the medium or the transport really is ;-> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Dang Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:15 AM To: [E

Re: question [7:17749]

See Dave Mike Dang wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know how and where to check to see if it's time for > re-certification? > > TIA. > > MD > > __ > FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. > Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com -- D

Re: question [7:17749]

You can find that on the certification tracking system... https://www.galton.com/~cisco_s/login.html ""Mike Dang"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Does anyone know how and where to check to see if it's time for > re-certification? > > TIA. > > MD > > >

RE: question [7:33012]

Assuming these are Cisco routers with current IOS... router#erase start This returns you to factory default. The routers will have no IP addresses, no routing protocols, no nuthin. They will not talk to one another. If you are just looking to clean the files up, you need to do some research o

RE: question [7:33012]

Keep your standard configs on a TFTP server, load 'um fresh when you need them. -Original Message- From: Gerald Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question [7:33012] Hello, I was wondering if anybody can help me out

Re: question [7:33012]

At 05:42 PM 1/23/02, Gerald Park wrote: >Hello, > >I was wondering if anybody can help me out on something that seems that I >can't seem to figure it out. I manage a group of routers at a university >and I would like to know how to erase configurations made on a router so >that the entire configu

Re: Question [7:33012]

>From "s vermill"

Re: Question [7:33012]

Darin, if you telnet your router and paste the configuration that you have in your text editor, you are going to paste it to the running-config and you are not going to overwrite it you are going to parse it!! With that method you can't ensure to reset your configuration to the "clean" one. I agr

Re: Question [7:33012]

He said to erase start first (and reload presumably). His method has the advantage over TFTP that you don't have to worry about the router having an IP address that can reach a TFTP server. Priscilla At 05:23 AM 1/24/02, Mario Sainz wrote: >Darin, if you telnet your router and paste the config

Re: Question about BSCN

The v1.0 tests have been retired. I would suggest going for the v2.0 track. Duck - Original Message - From: J. Scott Branscum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:51 AM Subject: Question about BSCN I passed CCNA 1.0 late July. Now moving on to CCN

RE: Question About Catalyst!

Is it possible that the servers NIC can't speak full duplex. I have seen this one b4. Try 100 meg half duplex. If that works and your happy with that then enjoy, if not replace the NIC in the server. -Original Message- From: Avila Castaneda Sergio Antonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen

RE: Question regarding CCNA

> I just started studying CCNA, can i get some advice?? what should i be focus> on when i study?> > thx> Hi Jimmy,   I took the CCNA a couple months ago.  Although I took the 1.0 exam, by most accounts the 2.0 seems to cover most of the same things, with some additions.  But these basic thi

Re: question on 2514

It's the IOS. You need the feature pack that supports IPX. Without a CCO login and a maintenance contract on the 2514 I suppose you would have to purchase one through a reseller. I recently picked one up for the 2600. If I recall correctly it cost between $300 and $400 for that feature pack.

Re: question on 2514

thank you mark for the information, i guss i will just have to memorize those ipx commands just knowing how much it is worht is enough to motivate me to memorize half of the book. thanks again ""Mark Harris"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8fdevb$paq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8fdevb$paq$[EMA

Re: question on 2514

It's a limitation of the IOS. You can buy and upgrade from any Cisco Reseller or Partner (including us!). --- ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all I have a Cisco 2514 with IOS 10.3 which I am using to study > for ccna. > but it dose not seem to have any ipx capability, is this the > limitati

RE: question about cisco

Not sure what your asking about IGRP / OSPF... your question is vague... but for your frame relay question try frame-relay map ip from both remote routers to the central point type router. Cory -Original Message- From: Sim Chee Tong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31,

Re: question about cisco

. Regards Atif -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sim Chee Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 9:39 PM Subject: RE: question about cisco >Not sure what your asking about IGRP / OSPF.

RE: question about cisco

Yes, This is why the routing protocols that different preference placed upon them: ie RIP 120, static 1 David Prescott -Original Message- From: Sim Chee Tong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question

RE: question [7:62655]

cause he is the moderator. he's moderating Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62657&t=62655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure vio

RE: question [7:62655]

Is it not because he belongs to the list, and he has gracefully decided to let us know that he is "out of the office" until the 10th? -Original Message- From: Jason Steig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2003 18:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: question [7:6265

Re: question [7:62655]

, and he has gracefully decided > to let us know that he is "out of the office" until the 10th? > > -Original Message- > From: Jason Steig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 February 2003 18:48 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: quest

Re: question [7:62655]

; > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Steig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 07 February 2003 18:48 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: question [7:62655] > > > > > > cause he is the moderator. he's moderating > >

Re: Question [7:64878]

Comments in-line *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 3/10/2003 at 4:03 AM Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\) wrote: >Hey Guys, > >Can anyone please help answer just few question for my assigment? Thanks > >1) what is the difference of ethernet 2 and ethernet SNAP frames ? Cisco's Ethern

Re: Question [7:59637]

I'm running Native IOS on 6509's and 6513's. The 6509's have been running native for about a year without any issues, both with SUP-2 and MSCF. One thing to remember is that you need to copy off the VLAN database (VLAN.DAT file). The one dilema is redundancy. With native IOS it's best to run redu

Re: Question [7:59637]

Depends on what you plan on doing on them. If you are going to be doing mostly layer 2 switching then I would leave them hybrid. If you plan on routing each port on each switch then definitely go native. ""Greg Rend"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had a quick

Re: Question? [7:61716]

Depends on what you mean by dialup? If you can get to enable mode you can restart the router. Just type 'reload'. uh don't forget to do a wri mem (copy run start). Lance ""Edwin Gonzalez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is it possible to reload a router over di

Re: Question? [7:61716]

I want to do a password recovery over a dialup modem conected to the console port. Is it possible or do I have to be physically present at the router? ""Captian Lance"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Depends on what you mean by dialup? > If you can get to enable m

Re: Question? [7:61716]

It is possible. just issue the 'reload' command Lance ""Edwin Gonzalez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I want to do a password recovery over a dialup modem conected to the console > port. Is it possible or do I have to be physically present at the router? > > ""

RE: Question? [7:61716]

You should be fine. Just make sure you are on the console port. Also, verify the break sequence for your terminal emulation software. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Edwin R Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question? [7:61716] I want to do a

RE: Question? [7:61716]

Uh... if he could get into enable mode to issue a 'reload' command, he could just change the password and there wouldn't be any need to do a password recovery?!?!? Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61724&t=61716 -

RE: Question? [7:61716]

that way... Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question? [7:61716] Uh... if he could get into enable mode to issue a 'reload' command

RE: Question? [7:61716]

Hammonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question? [7:61716] I have not been able to perfrom password recovery via a modem connected directly to console. When the router reloads, you get disconnected and have to re-dial which by

RE: Question? [7:61716]

s to power cycle the router, though the person performing the IOS password recovery procedure can be remote via a modem through the console port. -Original Message- From: Charles D Hammonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

Re: Question? [7:61716]

through the console port. > > -Original Message- > From: Charles D Hammonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Question? [7:61716] > > I have not been able to perfrom password recovery via a mo

RE: Question [7:51343]

Hamed, These commands basicly enable TACACS+ server for Authentication purpose. For example you need the first command to enable TACACS+ on your router, second command say that the default auhtentication is TACACS server and the third one says if no TACACS you can login using username and password

Re: Question [7:51343]

This guy that I recommend is pretty sharp: www.cisco.com :-) >From: "Hamed Sedighi" >Reply-To: "Hamed Sedighi" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Question [7:51343] >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:17:08 GMT > >Hi everybody, > >Who can explain me following command lines separately? Those are some >c

Re: question [7:33012]

Hi All, As per the information provided in your mail, I assume that you are managing some routers available in some Lab enviornment, where students do all their practicals etc. Now I would suggest you to keep copies of all your basic startup-configs on some PC so that you can paste them back as

RE: question? [7:75237]

Yes I do and how can I contribute to your good cause?:) Thank you Ollie AT&T Common Backbone 866-397-7309 Opt 1 -Original Message- From: Accsystest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question? [7:75237] got your email ad

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >