or Postfix is:
/etc/hosts
1.2.3.4example.com
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
smtp_host_lookup = native
Now I'm trying to achieve the same thing for Sendmail to no avail.
So far I've tried:
- the above /etc/hosts entry
- DEAMON_OPTIONS(`Port-smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Nam
Je me réponds à moi-même.
J'ai trouvé au fin fond du bouquin O'Reilly (Sendmail, 4th edition) une
solution :
GreetPause:192.168 0
# Pas d'authentification pour 127.0.0.1
Srv_Features:127.0.0.1 ALS
Je demande donc à sendmail de ne pas proposer AUTH (A), de ne pas
Bonjour à tous,
J'ai un petit souci avec une grosse configuration sendmail (merci de ne
pas commencer par me dire qu'il faut passer à autre chose).
Cette configuration fonctionne correctement depuis des années avec
toutes les grouilles nécessaires (dmarc, dkim, clamav
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've noticed that installing sendmail package was removing postfix and
vice versa.
That made me think these two were mutually exclusive.
After reinstalling postfix, logwatch suddenly started sending emails so
everything is now working as expected.
---
Adam
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 18:36:30 +1000
George at Clug wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I dislike people to reply to my questions but do not answer the
> question, instead suggest I do something totally different.
Yes, but sometimes:
a) that's the right answer anyway
b) it may not answer the OP's question. but
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:24:06 +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
&g
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
>
> to make logwatch use postfix
ny other email traffic being disabled.
>
> A simple working solution that I've found for Postfix is:
>
> /etc/hosts
> 1.2.3.4example.com
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
> smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
> smtp_host_lookup = native
>
> Now I'm trying to achieve th
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
Eee. Nothing?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
dpkg -L pos
Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
What exactly shall I substitute:
mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
to make logwatch use postfix (already working without DNS) instead of
sendmail?
On 21/07/2024 0
Sendmail is too old to be supported.
You may use postfix and exim instead. They are main stream MTA software
today.
On 2024-07-21 14:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
This is in a way a continuation of my recently "purely local DNS"
thread.
To recap: my objective is to send emails t
.com
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
smtp_host_lookup = native
Now I'm trying to achieve the same thing for Sendmail to no avail.
So far I've tried:
- the above /etc/hosts entry
- DEAMON_OPTIONS(`Port-smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl in sendmail.mc
followed by m4 s
to me:
SRV_Features:127.0.0.1 L U G
Specifically, I added the U and G features, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sendmail
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 09:34:39 +0100, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> cron isn’t a mail sending tool — not the right place to police something
> like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
There are two possible layers here. First, a cron job (typically a
shell command, or a shell script) might
Specifically, I added the U and G features, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sendmail-issue-after-sendmail-8-18-1-update-7312
even mail will do
so happily.
cron isn?t a mail sending tool ? not the right place to police something
like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
Mark
Sendmail now polices it - so cron emails get stuck if they contain a
bare cr. Presumably every mta is now doing something similar.
There may be a cr
; so happily.
>
> cron isn’t a mail sending tool — not the right place to police something
like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
Mark
lways worked.
> >
> > I'm only likely to have cron generating emails like this.
> >
> > Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
> > doesn't seem to have been a security update.
>
> It looks like it's coming from this change:
>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 6:08 PM Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> >> After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> >> seeing this in the logs:
> >&
, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sendmail-issue-after-sendmail-8-18-1-update-7312
I did not try this suggestion to use U2
like this.
Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
doesn't seem to have been a security update.
It looks like it's coming from this change:
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.17.1.9-2+deb12u2_changelog
* Fix CVE-2023-51765
this.
>
> Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
> doesn't seem to have been a security update.
It looks like it's coming from this change:
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.17.1.9-2+deb12u2_changelog
* Fix CVE-2
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
root@dirac:~# mail root
Cc:
Subject: test cr
this
is^Ma
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:20:24PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> > After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> > seeing this in the logs:
> >
>
> Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
MSP Queue status...
/var/spool/mqueue-client (2 requests)
-Q-ID- --Size
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available
> Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5
> CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available AUTH mechanisms.
I manually updated
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
STARTTLS=read, info: fds=9/4, err=2
Here's the full log from when I try to send a message through my
server with authentication:
Jun 30 11:42:59 bottom sm-mta[18852]: NOQUEUE: connect from [1.2.3.4]
Jun 30
Bonjour,
Il y a un article du wiki Debian sur Exim:
https://wiki.debian.org/Exim
Dans un scénario qui a l'air proche du tien, on y parle de relai
smarthost, de macro TLS et de réécriture d'adresse e-mail de l'émetteur.
(Je ne sais pas si ça joue mais je suis chez Free aussi et il me semble
que
Le 02/01/2023 à 14:01, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit :
Bonjour
Cette syntaxe à double ':' avant le n° de port (ex :
|smtp.example.com::587|) se retrouve à de nombreux endroits :
ex : https://www.pontikis.net/blog/gmail-smarthost-exim4-debian
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/
On 02/01/2023 14:01, roger.tar...@free.fr wrote:
Bonjour
Cette syntaxe à double ':' avant le n° de port (ex :
|smtp.example.com::587|) se retrouve à de nombreux endroits :
ex : https://www.pontikis.net/blog/gmail-smarthost-exim4-debian
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/
Quel
-mail-google/ |
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/ ]
Quel outil utiles-tu pour envoyer des e-mails depuis un programme avec un
service smtp tiers ?
De: "NoSpam"
À: "Liste Debian"
Envoyé: Lundi 2 Janvier 2023 13:33:05
Objet: Re: configurer sendmail/exim
Bonjour
Le 02/01/2023 à 02:49, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit :
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une
commande sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI
ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
> J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une
> commande sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI : echo "Subject: hello" |
> sendmail toto@ freefr ).
>
> Déjà, je souhaite pouvoir exploiter un serveur de mes
Bonjour et bonne année
On 02/01/2023 02:49, roger.tar...@free.fr wrote:
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
SMTP et EXIM sont complexes. Je conseille la lecture (à tête reposée)
d'un livre entier sur la question,
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une commande
sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI : echo "Subject: hello" | sendmail [
mailto:t...@e
There is an little helper program; try:
> testsaslauthd -u -p
>
> you might have to specify the location (-f path) of the unix socket if it
> is located
> somewhere uncommon.
>
> If your authentication works then the communication between sendmail and
> saslauthd
> is not
t; Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> > server
> > > for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> > > have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers
> > over
> > > the years, but mo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:37 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
>
> First, please do not top post.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> server
> > for a university
First, please do not top post.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
> for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> have deployed and configured
Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers over
the years, but most of them are on internal networks and relay mail
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:55:06AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
> configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
> trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
Hello,
Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
configuration, but SMTP auth does not work. I have verified that nslcd and
saslauthd
e finasserai la configuration plus tard.
>
> Une question résiduelle que je viens de me poser. Lorsqu'un utilisateur
> envoie un mail, il utilise le SMTP (sur le MX1) sur le port 587.
> sendmail demande une authentification. Si pas d'authentification, le
> mail est refusé. Mais sur le
poser. Lorsqu'un utilisateur
envoie un mail, il utilise le SMTP (sur le MX1) sur le port 587.
sendmail demande une authentification. Si pas d'authentification, le
mail est refusé. Mais sur le port 25, quel est le mécanisme qui fait
qu'un utilisateur ne peut pas envoyer directement un mail (que ce soit
/bin/newaliases
>> non_smtpd_milters = unix:/var/clamav/clamav-milter.sock
>> postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
>> proxy_interfaces = 192.168.15.14
>> queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
>> readme_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
>> relay_domains = $
_interfaces = 192.168.15.14
> queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
> readme_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
> relay_domains = $mydestination, systella.fr
> relay_recipient_maps =
> sample_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
> sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail
> s
Bonjour à tous,
Je tente la configuration d'un serveur de mail postfix comme backup
d'un sendmail des familles et le moins qu'on puisse dire, c'est que si
la configuration de sendmail est complexe, on voit assez rapidement ce
qui cloche contrairement à postfix ;-)
Je
Bonjour à tous,
Après bricolage dans le sendmail.cf, j'ai trouvé que sendmail allait
chercher un fichier de conf Sendmail.conf partout sauf dans
/etc/mail/sasl. Normalement, ce fichier s'appelle d'ailleurs
Sendmail.conf.2 vu qu'il s'agit de saslv2.
Un lien de /etc/mail
Merci. Mais ça, je connais, je suis un barbu capable d'envoyer des
mails par telnet. Mon problème est surtout que sendmail semble
totalement ignorer sasl. J'en suis à comparer deux sendmail.cf, celui
d'un site fonctionnel et celui du site que je suis en train de monter.
Et même là, je ne vois rien d'ab
pataper: j'y connais vraiment rien
mais peut-être ici auras-tu un début de piste (utilisation de telnet et
du port 587 pour tester sasl/smtp)
https://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Protocols/howtotestsendmailauthentication.php
Bonsoir à tous,
Je suis en train de monter pour une association un serveur de mail et
je butte sur un problème que je n'arrive par à résoudre.
J'utilise un sendmail des familles (parce que ça fait trente ans que
j'utilise sendmail sur tous mes systèmes allant de VMS à
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 09:34:25 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600 David Wright wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> > (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> > Envelope-from (set to the same as my From
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 08:52:30 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
>
> > What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
>
> It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
> unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I take it that was
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> Envelope-from (set to the same as my From address above) was being
> changed by my mail hosting service
On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I "think" I then subscribed with noctiluc...@sky.com which worked for a
bit but then from
On Wed 25 Nov 2020 at 00:08:27 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> > > collection, sendmail and thunderbird
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:11:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > > while away from home, as I have both
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > while away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but
> > they are extremely limited toys and they
>> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >>> > like this is a common practice.
> >>> >
> >>> > What are the advantages of this
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
Joe wrote:
...
> proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook while
> away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but they are
> extremely limited toys and they are owned by Google. If I need a mobile
> computer, then I want a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:30:41AM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:34:56 -0600 David Wright
> wrote:
>
> >>> On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Interesting. I'll try it next time I want
t;> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >> like this is a common practice.
> >>
> >> What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting
> >> tbir
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:30:49 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
> I like the idea of a local imap server. I have a RPi that will do the
> job, sitting ready and waiting. How easy is it to get phone/tablet to
> connect while I'm away? though. A good URI would be an excellent
> answer.
>
Less
On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:50:34 -0600 John Hasler
wrote:
>> I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy.
>> This means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more
>> than a few minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it
>> through Mailagent and
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:19:16 +0200 Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>>> On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>>> >
>>> > Good afternon All
>>> >
>>> > I was interested to
erested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
>>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
>>> > like this is a common practice.
>>> >
>>> > What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting
>>> &g
I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy. This
means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more than a few
minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it through
Mailagent and Spamassassin and then delivers it to my inbox. Outgoing
mail is delivered
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a commo
On 2020-11-23 at 05:43, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100 Keith Bainbridge
> wrote:
>> PS Am I wrong to avoid 'everyting in 1 file' where possible (mail
>> dir rather than mbox in this case)? OK this is probably a whole
>> separate topic.
>
> As I've posted elsewhere, I have
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a common practice.
>
> What are the a
On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
It would appear so. I guess you could also have removed the Re:
from the subject line.
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection,
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it all? - or any other client for that matter
Dan,
> You could do the wrapper, or you could install nullmailer, which
> is an extremely simple MTA that always hands off mail to a
> relayhost (i.e. somebody else's problem).
I ended up with a following wrapper:
$ cat /usr/sbin/sendmail
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# As header fields are a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/6/19 5:40 am, Martin T wrote:
> What could be the most elegant workaround in this situation? Create
> a /usr/sbin/sendmail wrapper script which processes the
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t" command called by apt_listcha
with "email_address" configuration option. Now
> when I upgrade a package which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
> the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
> using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
> /u
kage which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
/usr/sbin/sendmail binary installed. I prefer to use mail/mailx and an
external MTA.
What could be the most elegan
Ce n'est pas n'importe quoi comme réponses...
Trois "relay=hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com., dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred" sont toujours suivis par un message DSN complet
"relay=hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com. [104.47.34.33],
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 403 4.7.0 TLS handshake
Bon, bon, bon... C'est plus grave que ça. Le patch semble fonctionner.
En revanche, les codes d'erreur sont tronqués aléatoirement. Sur le même
message envoyé à un MX en échec, j'ai aléatoirement dans mes logs :
Nov 5 18:00:13 rayleigh sm-mta[31991]: wA5GxrK0031751: to=<...>,
delay=00:00:19,
Bonjour à tous,
J'utilise depuis des années un patch à sendmail pour envoyer des
mails à des serveurs avec une configuration TLS foireuse.
Ce patch est le suivant :
diff -ruN sendmail-8.15.2-/cf/feature/tls_failures.m4
sendmail-8.15.2/cf/feature
--- sendmail-8.15.2-/cf
On 29.08.18 11:57, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> However both sendmail and update-inetd are orphaned at the moment (no
> regular maintainers, although Andreas Beckmann has done a lot of work
> via the QA team)
After favouring sendmail for a decade and a half, I thought I was slow
to switch t
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:42:01AM -0400, Luis Finotti wrote:
Thanks for the pointer! sendmail-base.prerm had the line:
update-inetd --group MAIL --disable smtp,smtps,submission;
and I was getting the error
update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
This would appear
> Building dependency tree
>> > Reading state information... Done
>> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
>> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
>> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
>> > After this operation
Thanks once more for the support! The problem is now solved.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:20 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
>
> > # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> > (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories c
On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
> update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
> dpkg: error pro
g state information... Done
> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
> > After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> > S
0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Setting up sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
sendmail-base is what you should be trying to remove.
And you should be using dpkg directly, not messing around wi
Firstly, thanks for the reply!
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:04 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> > aptosid -- http://
On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
Perhaps their forums might help.
> I tried to install and it failed: https
Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
I tried to install and it failed: https://pastebin.com/Qu2jRqsn
'apt -f install' did not fix it, nor did 'dpkg --configure -a'.
Since it was not essential (and did
Bonjour à tous,
Pour information, le sendmail de testing est actuellement moisi. Il
transforme les erreurs 4xx en 5xx et c'est un comportement connu d'une
des versions de développement. J'ai remonté le bug 807258. En attendant,
il est urgent d'attendre avec un 8.14-8 des familles à
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:44 +, jon wrote:
>
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
> libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
> 8.2
>
> I want to use se
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
8.2
I want to use sendmail with tcp wrappers but it does not seem to play,
it looks like it was compi
I finally managed to get sendmail working using systemd.
Here is my /etc/systemd/system/sendmail.service:
[Unit]
Description=Sendmail Mail Transport Agent
Requires=clamav-daemon.service spamassassin.service
After=syslog.target network.target clamav-daemon.service
spamassassin.service
Conflicts
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:07:37PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this has anything to do with that:
# systemctl enable sendmail
Synchronizing state for sendmail.service with sysvinit
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the /etc/init.d/sendmail
script now runs /bin/systemctl
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the
/etc/init.d/sendmail script now runs /bin/systemctl start
sendmail.service. But sendmail isn't started. Even running
'/bin
Hi,
Michael Grant mgr...@grant.org writes:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
A nessesary correction - /etc/init.d/sendmail *tries* to run
'/bin/systemctl start sendmail.service'.
But, since no sendmail* package provide systemd's service file -
nothing happens
1 - 100 of 3010 matches
Mail list logo
