Re: [flexcoders] Apollo installer

On Wednesday 28 Nov 2007, ecmntech wrote: > Hello guys. Just want to ask, if there's any site or anybody have a > Apollo installer? labs.adobe.com > Since AIR is for Flex 3. Apollo was the code name for AIR. Same thing. > I'm using Flex Builder 2.0.1 That's nice. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo RELEASE quality?

I think the current guidance for the release of Apollo 1.0 is "the second half of 2007". - Gordon From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kellogg Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:29 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [f

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo NativeWindow.alwaysInFront, .orderInBackOf(), etc.

apollocoders http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/apollocoders/ Adobe's Apollo Forum http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72&catid =641 Sam --- We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to join our team building Flex

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo HTMLControl capabilities

Hey Mike - Can we assume that all the controls over PDF that are exemplified in the Adobe Digital Edition will be included in the full release of Apollo ? Only thing I would like to see added to the API is ability to apply animated effects to PDF pages. ( Page flip) Ben Marchbanks ::: alQem

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo HTMLControl capabilities

Yeah, I just saw that yesterday. It looks promising, but the whole software renderer isn't going to quite cut it. I work for a software company called Right Hemisphere and we have a free 3D viewer called Deep View. This is

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo HTMLControl capabilities

Mark What kind of 3D view do you need, could it be achived by utilising Papervision3D which should be able to run in Apollo: http://blog.papervision3d.org/ Andrew On 24/03/07, Mark Doberenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > This is more of a general question regarding capabilities of thi

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo HTMLControl capabilities

The only plugins that will be supported for 1.0 is Flash and PDF. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Doberenz wrote: > > > This is more of a general question regarding capabilities of this class. > > What kind of things in an HTML file will be displayable using this class? > What if an HTML

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

ation. - Gordon From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ju Aedis Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:50 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication Gordon: if dispatchEvent() in a

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener? use event.xxx = xxx? 2007/3/23, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection. > > J

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

, 2007 6:33 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener? use event.xxx = xxx? 2007/3/23, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >: Windows are all in s

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

Dang, that's a good idea I'll totally have a play with that one tomorrow. Thanks Mike!!! On 3/22/07, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection. Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it. mi

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

how can the broadcast trasfer the info to listener? use event.xxx = xxx? 2007/3/23, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection. Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

Windows are all in scope, so you dont have to use LocalConnection. Just have one window broadcast an event, and have the other listen for it. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Schmalle wrote: > > > I would go out on a limb and say yes. > > Not in alpha but, if we are going to be able t

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

I would go out on a limb and say yes. Not in alpha but, if we are going to be able to addChild() on a newly created window, I don't see why you could communicate with a window that you created from the main app. Peace, Mike On 22 Mar 2007 14:32:13 -0700, Mark Doberenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

Oh yeah, I remember playing with those a long time ago... not the nicest stuff to deal with from what I can remember. Thanks On 22 Mar 2007 14:28:43 -0700, Carlos Rovira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You should read about LocalConnection. It's an old Flash API to communicate between different f

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo - multi-window communication

You should read about LocalConnection. It's an old Flash API to communicate between different flash movies 2007/3/22, Mark Doberenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I've been thinking about using Apollo for an extension to an app I've been working on in Flex. The current issue with the Flex app is th

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo SDK

Thanks ! downloading the plugin . Thanks once again for quick Replies. Regards On 20 Mar 2007 03:46:42 -0700, Andrew Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mayur You'll save yourself a lot of time and grief if you were to download and install the plugin for Flex Builder, especially if you're a

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo SDK

On Tuesday 20 Mar 2007, learner wrote: > Now thinking that it should be possible to work with Apollo SDK and > flexbuilder > by copying the files from Apollo SDK to flex sdk in corresponding directory I installed a separate Flex SDK to the one that comes with Flex builder, and updated that one w

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo SDK

Mayur You'll save yourself a lot of time and grief if you were to download and install the plugin for Flex Builder, especially if you're already using Flex Builder for development. It's made to work seemlessly... Andrew On 20/03/07, learner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I downloaded

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo SDK

I downloaded the Apollo SDK before downloading the plugin for flexbuilder. Now thinking that it should be possible to work with Apollo SDK and flexbuilder by copying the files from Apollo SDK to flex sdk in corresponding directory and replacing the mxmlc.jar in libs and version (as mentioned in d

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo SDK

On Tuesday 20 Mar 2007, learner wrote: > I downloaded Apollo SDK zip and checked out its content. It contains : .. > Now, I am using flex builder to develop flex application. You don't want the SDK download then, you want the plugin. > and how do I install > apollo runtime from SDK zip. You ca

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

; give it a few hours before you start commenting on broken links, > they're > > still working out some kinks :-) but have fun! > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] > On > > B

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

> > > > > give it a few hours before you start commenting on broken links, they're > > > still working out some kinks :-) but have fun! > > > > > > ____ > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [m

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

;re > still working out some kinks :-) but have fun! > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com ] On > Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:31 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re:

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

IL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:31 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/ > > > > > > oh yeah boy! > &

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

ehalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:31 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/ > > > > > > oh yeah boy! > > > >

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

oders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/ oh yeah boy! On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/ <http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/>

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Now Live on Labs | http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

oh yeah boy! On 19/03/2007, at 3:54 PM, greg h wrote: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/apollo/

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo (Should Adobe Keep the Name)

On 3/18/07, Weyert de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any chance you could send me picture of the Apollo logo? yours, weyert -- Brendan Meutzner Stretch Media - RIA Adobe Flex Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stretchmedia.ca apollo.PNG Description: PNG image

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo (Should Adobe Keep the Name)

http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/files/apollo/wallpaper/apollo_stickers.pdf mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weyert de Boer wrote: > > > Any chance you could send me picture of the Apollo logo? > > yours,

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo (Should Adobe Keep the Name)

I like the name Apollo myself, and I'm sure the Apollo team is interested in the community's ideas about what the product should be named, but picking a product name is a tricky business that involves legal as well as marketing considerations. Gordon From: flex

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.

Its not on Adobe Labs yet... but soon :) Dimitrios Gianninas Optimal Payments Inc. -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of nboulet Sent: Wed 3/7/2007 8:23 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start. Hi guys :) I've bee

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo External API

No. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] bruce1976 wrote: > > > Hi, > > Currently, Flex has an External API that allows a Flex app to call > javascript or an ActiveX control within the browser. Will Apollo be > bundled with a JVM and use an External API to call Java methods? > > Thanks, > > Bruc

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo External API

On Wednesday 07 Mar 2007, bruce1976 wrote: > Will Apollo be > bundled with a JVM I'd say that's gonna be a no :-) -- Tom Chiverton Helping to quickly improve impactful systems On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com This email is sent for and

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.

There is no public SDK as of yet. -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nboulet Sent: 07 March 2007 13:23 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start. Hi guys :) I've been reading this mailing li

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.

On 3/7/07, nboulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys :) > I've been reading this mailing list since quite a bit and I have a > question. Where can I start with Apollo development? Hmm... I guess you missed the part about it not being released yet ;) Sorry for being snarky, I just couldnt resis

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo and where do we start.

Hi, You need to be patient for a bit more to get the Apollo early releases. But for now, start by using Flex. Everything in Flex will move to Apollo seamlessly. David From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nboulet Sent: Wednes

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

> Flash Player 9 already has all you need for building libraries to > connect to all sorts of remote filesystems: sockets, binary and > otherwise. > Agreed, I was hoping that Apollo would deal with the heavy lifting on some of this stuff vs giving front end components was the main gist of my o

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

Impudent1 wrote: > So am I to take this that Apollo will not let me deal with a remote > filesystem? > If I cannot read/write files from a workstation to a server, or deal with a > remote data connection, Apollo suddenly seems really useless for my app :( There's no reason that you'd even need

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

slangeberg wrote: > Oh yeah, did he say: > > limited to 2g >> >> As in a 2GB POST limit? That doesn't seem like much of a limit. I may > question the logic of posting a 2G file! If that's not the current limit, > what is? fwiw , this is an internal video approval system app, and 2g is nothing for

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

Oh yeah, did he say: limited to 2g As in a 2GB POST limit? That doesn't seem like much of a limit. I may question the logic of posting a 2G file! If that's not the current limit, what is? Tom, what's the current method you're referring to, for 'sending' files to server? -Scott On 3/2/07, To

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

On Thursday 01 Mar 2007, Impudent1 wrote: > So am I to take this that Apollo will not let me deal with a remote > filesystem? If I cannot read/write files from a workstation to a server, or > deal with a remote data connection, Apollo suddenly seems really useless > for my app :( You can always se

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

Binary sockets, for one.. Any other ideas out there? -Scott On 3/1/07, Impudent1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: slangeberg wrote: > Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities > (talking to > networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality / > librar

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

slangeberg wrote: > Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities > (talking to > networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality / > library / language are you comparing this to? Well I still have not seen how this will dovetail into the offline/onlin

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

Uh, you're still going to have 'at least' all those capabilities (talking to networked service) already existing in Flex.. What kind of functionality / library / language are you comparing this to? -Scott On 3/1/07, Impudent1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just taking a quick look and this concern

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo Book: Apollo for Adobe Flex Developers Pocket Guide

Just taking a quick look and this concerns me: "Apollo provides a file I/O API that lets applications read and write files and directories on the user’s computer"... "The Flex framework for Apollo includes components for working with files and directories, but these are graphical components for n

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Tom Chiverton Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 11:27 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: > Apollo offers one or more offline data stores. So does Flash - with SharedObject.

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On Monday 05 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: > Apollo offers one or more offline data stores. So does Flash - with SharedObject. I believe the question was about an embedded database, i.e. can talk SQL. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to vitalistically promote sexy architectures ***

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Apollo offers one or more offline data stores. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeffry Houser wrote: > > Apollo offers an embedded DB? I haven't heard that yet. >

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

I dont have the original thread, but I believe the question was, what plugins are supported within HTML in Apollo. The answer is Flash and PDF. HTML is supported, but not as a plugin. It is a core part of the runtime. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Chiverton wrote: > On Friday 02 Feb 200

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

He was referring to plugins that will be supported by the Apollo WebKit engine. Shan Tom Chiverton wrote: On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0. Not HTML ?

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

At 11:10 AM 2/4/2007, you wrote: Many users are still disconnected. Nomad users are still common place. Most sales people are getting out o the road in order to create opportunities as opposed to staying in the office. Few rural areas are 100% covered by high speed (wifi,gprs,gsm,3G) access. T

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

ssage d'origine- De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeffry Houser Envoye : samedi 3 fevrier 2007 17:15 A : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: > Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0. Not HTML ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to apprehensively improve magnetic deliverables This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LL

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

-Message d'origine- De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Shannon Hicks Envoyé : samedi 3 février 2007 16:38 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features You never said anything about this in your previous email.

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

t de Andrey Envoyé : samedi 3 février 2007 16:39 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features Haven't replied too often, but this one struck a chord. In real enterprise-level applications, you are split up into tiers. you have presentation layer (which a

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Shannon Hicks Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run your DLL's on my Mac. If you

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

of the market. Let's dump everything and start over"? I'm totally missing your logic here. jason -Message d'origine- *De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Shannon Hicks *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogr

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

It seems to me there is a lot of speculation about Apollo, based on very little actual knowledge. All this speculation of "Apollo must have x feature" seems premature. I don't Grok Apollo and don't expect to until there is an actual product available or some documentation to read. Why wo

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

flexcoders@ yahoogroups.com]*De la part de* Shannon Hicks *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

ere. jason -Message d'origine- *De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Shannon Hicks *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features The real value of A

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

e market. Let's dump everything and start over"? I'm totally missing your logic here. jason -Message d'origine- *De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Shannon Hicks *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Shannon Hicks Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 18:31 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features The real value of Apollo would be cross-platform applications. I can't run your DLL's on my Mac. If you need DLL's, use VB to build your app, and

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

to:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] > > *On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers > > *Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39 > > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo f

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

t de* Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used as desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect t

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On 2/3/07, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Technically, you could create PDFs within Apollo by doing it via > ActionScript, but we do have built in APIs for dynamically generating > PDF content. wow. > Do you have an example of what you would like to do with generating PDF > content? (

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

nfo about this? > > > > João Fernandes > > > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *On Behalf Of *Mike Chambers > *Sent:* sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39 > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexco

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

ders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Chambers Sent: sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 17:39 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major advantage. It will still be possible to cr

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

I think that just getting the app out of the browser is also a major advantage. It will still be possible to create platform specific Apollo apps, but (at least for 1.0), when we prioritize features, we are going to prioritize those which enable and encourage cross platform applications. mike

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

rks, and use Apollo to create engaging user experiences. jason -Message d'origine- *De :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de* Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk *Envoyé :* vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54 *À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Actually, that is not necessarily the case. If you look at our descriptions of Apollo, we try to make it very clear that Apollo is focused at bringing RIAs to the desktop. It is this use case that is driving feature prioritization. From the FAQ: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:dev

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Only Flash and PDF are supported in 1.0. I will update the FAQ with the info. http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:developerfaq mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Newman wrote: > > > Tom Chiverton wrote: > > Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch >

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

You probably heard drag and drop into apollo (local file into app). However, it should be possible to simulate drag from browser into apollo app. mikeh chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Chiverton wrote: > I'm sure there was a quote about being able to drag applications of web sites > onto deskt

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

xperiences. jason -Message d'origine- De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk Envoyé : vendredi 2 février 2007 16:54 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features To be honest... all this

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

To be honest... all this talk I've been hearing about Apollo being used as desktop applications using web technologies... I would kinda expect that you can launch exe passing parameters ( like CLI style or something similar ), talk to dynamic libraries like .dll ( Windows ), .so ( Linux )... kinda

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On Friday 02 Feb 2007, Kevin Newman wrote: > Tom Chiverton wrote: > > Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch > > native local applications ? > > As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit, I would *expect* them to do that, did read something somewhere ? > does this i

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Tom Chiverton wrote: > Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch native > local applications ? > As far as I know, Apollo is using webkit, does this include the ability to run other plugins besides Flash (like Java)? If so, can you use one of those other plugins (j

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:34 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features Hi, This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On Wednesday 31 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: > I think the scenario you described below would be possible without > having to launch an EXE Well, yes, if mailto: HREF's are supported, but we may also want to fire up VoIP interface apps etc. etc. > (although I would have to think about the pul

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

word. add my vote to being able to pass parameters to other exes Impudent1 LeapFrog Productions

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

I think the scenario you described below would be possible without having to launch an EXE (although I would have to think about the pull the app off your website). mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Chiverton wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: >> That is one of the feature

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

Hi, This feature is KEY for our company too. We are developing speech services (DLL based)...and we will use APOLLO if we can use those DLLs...please, implement it on 1.0 !!! Thanks --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I agree that this feauture is key for our company.

RE: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

I agree that this feauture is key for our company. Please make it possible to call an exe and pass parameters! >On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: >> That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might >> not make it in. > >Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

On Tuesday 30 Jan 2007, Mike Chambers wrote: > That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might > not make it in. Well, we'd love to see the feature in (which is why I asked :-) ). Obviously if you have this ability, you can write a trivial exe wrapper to get the shared ob

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

No. That will not be in 1.0. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk wrote: > > > extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic > libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux )

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

That is one of the features being considered for 1.0, although it might not make it in. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Chiverton wrote: > > > Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch > native > local applications ? > -- > Tom Chiverton

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

If MDM Zinc can do it, then I expect Apollo to be able. On 1/30/07, Jerome Clarke a.k.a sinatosk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux ) On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo features

extending on that... will we be able to communicate with dynamic libraries? ( like .DLL on windows, .SO on linux ) On 1/30/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone or has read somewhere, if Apollo will allow you to launch native local applications ? -- Tom Chiverton *

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo

That's correct. - Gordon -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Chiverton Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:17 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Apollo On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:20, devisbal

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo

On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:20, devisbalsemin wrote: > have you some Apollo beta news? Last I heard it was in closed beta. Under NDA. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to heterogeneously scale industry-wide developments This email is sent for and

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo

Apollo Wish Requests can go to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The number #1 wish for me is this: create flash applications that run from CD (like a Flash Projector) WITHOUT the need to install anything (like Flash Projector, but with more rights and more access to the system). -- You will be able to

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo

Have you thought about using zinc? http://multidmedia.com/ Can't see anything you mentioned below which is not already possible with flash/flex + zinc -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Essl, Markus Sent: 14 December 2006 10:30 T

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo

Until Apollo is real and proves to have the features you are requesting (c++ extensibility??), the profile of your project says "Director" all over it. At least if you are trying to keep within the Adobe product line for software development. A Director shell, that is, which uses an embedded

RE: [flexcoders] Apollo

Hi Markus, I have not used Apollo yet, so I'm only working off of theories based on what I have read and seen thus far. I think apollo might be worth looking at, I'm not sure if it will satisfy your basic need for not having to install onto a CD. From what I can gather there is a framework ins

Re: [flexcoders] Apollo

On Thursday 14 December 2006 10:29, Essl, Markus wrote: > I wanted to ask if there is a place for a wish list for Apollo. It is > christmas anyway! http://adobe.com/go/wish > The number #1 wish for me is this: create flash applications that run > from CD (like a Flash Projector) WITHOUT the need