+1
I've been mentoring the project since it entered the incubator and I truly feel
they have demonstrated they know the Apache way.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hello Bertrand,
On 16 Jun 2014, at 8:57 am, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Here's current Board member Bertrand Delacretaz in 2012:
...
People come and go, so to be realistic I'd say you need
+1 from me on that as well (as one of the other mentors of the project). As I
said already when this was discussed within the Celix community, I think that,
although small, the community is slowly growing, they have demonstrated that
they know how to do releases, discuss things on the mailing
On 13 Jun 2014, at 17:32 pm, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Celix Project:
* Alexander Broekhuis
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Chip,
On 23 Apr 2014, at 16:28 , Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
This is the discussion thread for this proposal. We would also like to
solicit contributions from additional IPMC members willing to mentor the
potential podling. Anyone interested?
Yes, I am interested in
I agree with sebb and David that it's a good idea to remove links to SVN from
the download page and I propose that the Celix community changes this on their
website.
At the same time I think this should be a separate discussion, as this thread
is about voting about the Celix release itself.
We have had many great talks about podlings in the past, so I see no reason why
not. I would definitely encourage them to get the word out!
Greetings, Marcel
On 25 Jan 2014, at 17:36 pm, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on
Formally closing this vote now. There were no -1 votes, so the vote is a
success and the IP can now be imported by the project.
On 18 Dec 2013, at 23:28 , Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
Apache Celix
to be updated. No need to re-run the vote if the document is corrected.
On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin specification. The donation is tracked by CELIX-29 [1].
The IP clearance document is placed under:
, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin specification. The donation is tracked by CELIX-29 [1].
The IP clearance document is placed under:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance
mistakes.
Greetings, Marcel
On 18 Dec 2013, at 17:08 , Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Is there a software grant for this donation? I didn't see any reference from
any of the below links (nor in CELIX-81 either).
Craig
On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:47 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote
Given the issues raised by Craig and Dave, I am cancelling this vote. I will
fix the mistakes and start a new vote.
Greetings, Marcel
On 18 Dec 2013, at 9:47 , Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation
Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin specification. The donation is tracked by CELIX-81 [1].
The (updated) IP clearance document is placed under:
It would be nice if everybody would started wearing their Apache hats and act
as individuals that are interested in joining an exciting new project in the
incubator. I would prefer it if everybody would assume good intentions here.
We're all collaborating out in the open as a community, so
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I would never search for a generic job scheduling application in the Wicket
project. I still don't know exactly what this new project is about, but the
fact that it happens to use Wicket in itself is not enough to make it a Wicket
subproject if you ask me.
Greetings, Marcel
On Jun 5, 2013, at
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Simone,
In general I'm always sceptical when people point at old releases and say this
must be okay because X did it like this as well. However, in this case I agree
that there are many packagers that put in an extra folder in their source
archive and put those files there.
So:
+1 for
On Dec 27, 2012, at 21:09 , Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Hello Roman,
Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple
of weeks.
After Luciano stepped down
-1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and LICENSE
files, but they must be located at the root of the archive [1], and not in a
subfolder like they are now.
A question about the contents of the NOTICE file, can you explain why you
included the line:
Copyright
Hello Christian,
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcel,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
-1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and
LICENSE files
Well, I don't think it's fine. As long as our release policy states that all
releases must be archived on /dist we should do exactly that. Or change the
policy.
Greetings, Marcel
On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:53 , Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The Maven PMC pushes no plugin releases
On Dec 21, 2012, at 13:52 , Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Give me a URL where this policy is and I'll edit it.
On Dec 19, 2012, at 14:15 , Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/12/19 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Disclaimer and License is available in the source tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/
I do not see a chance to put
Hello Roman,
Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple of
weeks. After Luciano stepped down as a mentor some time ago, we are still one
mentor short. Would you consider becoming one, so we have three again?
Greetings, Marcel
On Dec 13, 2012, at 22:39 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/12/13 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com:
Reading your report, I don't see any barrier to graduation. This could
be good, insofar as you all could discuss this, and move toward
graduation. Or it could be less good, if
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use
On Nov 4, 2012, at 23:29 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
At the bottom of the template for each podling's report, I'd like to have a
space for each of the mentors, every month, to reaffirm his or her
involvement in the podling. Thus, instead of (at most) one mentor signing
On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn't seem
to help. But since this is only the
Just to wrap it up, the 72 hour window has more than passed, so I'm calling
this IP clearance complete.
Thank you.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl
wrote:
Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
http
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
написал:
One minor note:
- In [1] I noticed files related to
vanished!!!
Looking at commit history it seems that both Marcel Offermans and
myself made a commit at the same time (around 5 mins ago).
I have no idea how to revert a commit, and really hope I haven't
somehow deleted the report. Can someone please point me in the right
direction to rectify
Can someone please (re)grant me write access to the incubator wiki? I am
mentoring the Celix project and want to sign off a report there.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
MarcelOffermans
On Jul 3, 2012, at 23:10 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Can someone please (re)grant me write access to the incubator wiki? I am
mentoring the Celix project and want to sign off a report
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
understand his point correctly, *no* binary dependencies are
acceptable within a source
+1
And thanks a lot Noel!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Ross,
Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
If this VOTE isn't successful, then he'll remain the chair. If
you want to explicitly call a VOTE
+1
Makes perfect sense to me!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
-1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
a year old and lacking crisp plan for graduatuation:
Celix
A plan is being discussed on the list, but did not make it into this month's
report. I would kindly like to ask
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
-1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
a year old and lacking crisp plan
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/11/2012 6:02 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
-1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
a year old and lacking crisp plan for graduatuation:
Celix
A plan
Whilst I agree there is value in demonstrating a starting podling what a good
report should look like by doing it for them, I also strongly believe in
learning by doing, so I would still propose that a podling has a go at it
themselves, before having a mentor step in. In the end, this is also a
it.
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: antel...@apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings
Whilst I agree
On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
UNSIGNED JANUARY REPORTS:
Celix
Celix is late reporting this month because of holidays. A report is being
worked on, written by the PPMC and actively monitored by me. You can expect it
later today.
Greetings, Marcel
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Alex,
On Dec 19, 2011, at 21:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
First of all, thanks for this proposal, it looks well thought out. I have a
question
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
On Dec 18, 2011, at 18:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose
btopp...@apache.org
* Clement Escoffierclem...@apache.org
* Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
* Jean-Baptiste Onofre jbono...@apache.org
* Karl Pauls kpa...@apache.org
* Marcel Offermans ma
jbono...@apache.org
* Karl Pauls kpa...@apache.org
* Marcel Offermans ma...@apache.org
* Toni Menzel to...@apache.org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Marcel Offermans
be appointed to the office of Vice
approval -- hence,
Please vote to approve this release.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Time to call the vote on the ace version 0.8.1-incubator
subprojects releases.
* +1 votes from Marcel Offermans***, Jean-Baptiste Onofré***, Toni
Menzel*, Bram de
As a heads up to the IPMC we wanted to announce that we just started a release
vote[1] on the ace-dev mailing list about ACE 0.8.1-incubator. This release
basically fixes a few issues that came up while running our community
graduation vote [2]. As soon as the vote has been closed, we will call
Broekhuis, David
Bosschaert, Benson Margulies (*), Chris A Mattmann (*), Alex Karasulu (*),
Julien Vermillard (*), Alan D. Cabrera (*), Guillaume Nodet (*), Hadrian
Zbarcea (*), Jean-Baptiste Onofré (*), Marcel Offermans (***)
There were no other votes.
* = IPMC
** = PPMC
*** IPMC + PPMC
The vote
On Nov 21, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 21 November 2011 08:42, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Some time back we moved to having 3 mentors, which had the positive of more
On Nov 21, 2011, at 18:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/21/2011 11:11 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Speaking wearing a hat:
There is no requirement for monolithic releases. The project can
choose whatever units it likes to release, so long as each one of them
is fully buildable from
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations and did a release in May this year to
demonstrate we follow the
Hello Ant,
On Nov 17, 2011, at 16:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not against
On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FedizProposal
Definitely an interesting proposal! Just a comment on the affiliations section:
isn't it true that both Olivier Lamy and Colm O'hEigeartaigh are also working
for Talend? Of course part of
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Andrey,
On 30 Jul 2011, at 10:07 , Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
I am author of Imagero, JGUI, UIO and some other nice libraries.
I want to transfer my work to Apache.
However I don't have time and fortitude to do it by myself.
So I search for someone who could do it for (or with) me.
If
process etc.
So again, I hope find here someone who could help me.
Andrey
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marcel Offermans [mailto:marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl]
Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juli 2011 12:17
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Searching volunteer
Hello
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I removed it from the monthly section.
On 19 May 2011, at 3:46 , David Crossley wrote:
Alex, same answer as for March 2011 report:
Celix is listed in the Monthly section of ReportingSchedule.
Clutch gathers that data.
If your project feels that it has finished their monthly
reporting
+1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Antoine,
For me it's non-controversial. I'd love to see something like this, but I'm
probably not going to be able to spend a lot of time contributing to it. Maybe
some OSGi specific parts, especially if we can somehow integrate them with Bnd
and BndTools.
Greetings, Marcel
On Jan 17,
On 12 Dec 2010, at 15:50 , Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As per a the discussion and expressed interest in
general@incubator.apache.org, please create the
android-inter...@incubator.apache.org mailing list.
Make me an initial moderator, but I'll request others to volunteer.
Please add me as a
On 30 Nov 2010, at 7:52 , Dan Peterson wrote:
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 24 Nov 2010, at 4:29 , Michael MacFadden wrote:
I agree, there are other wave implementations popping up, some of which
include wave in the name and some don't. Lightwave for example is one
such project. I think that Apache Wave and the Wave in a Box product should
be fine.
On 22 Nov 2010, at 12:51 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting Aries to an Apache
TLP and graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hours.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To
I was present at those discussions, and I very much like the idea. One other
project that already works on Android is Apache ACE (deploying software
components to an Android based application that uses Apache Felix plus the ACE
management agent).
Learning about more project that work on
+1
On 9 Nov 2010, at 0:36 , Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
The vote for Celix to enter the incubator is now closed and has been ACCEPTED.
The results:
+6 (binding): Davanum Srinivas, Karl Pauls, Luciano Resende, Felix Meschberger,
Bertrand Delacretaz, Alan D. Cabrera
+1 (non-binding): Richard S. Hall
Thanks to everybody who joined in on the
to a named target.
* Confluence Wiki
To be able to provide help, documentation, faq etc, a wiki is needed.
= Initial Committers =
Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Marcel Offermans
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Marcel Offermans
* Karl Pauls
* Luciano Resende
On 6 Oct 2010, at 9:52 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
...As the champion, I'd be happy to be a mentor too. This would be my first
time, so I probably
need to formally join the Incubator PMC first?...
Yes
On 18 Oct 2010, at 21:12 , Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Please evaluate the status of your project with respect to graduation. Why,
for example, are Thrift and JSPWiki not yet ready to fly? What about Ace?
ACE is still working towards a release. We want to demonstrate we can do that
first.
Over the last couple of days, we have seen some good suggestions and support
for the initial proposal. For implementing the Remote Services, some candidates
have been identified (Axis2/C and SCA bindings in Tuscany).
Before starting a vote we need a couple of mentors to support the project
Hello Richard,
On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:21 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
I think this is interesting. However, I'd like to point out that you may need
to take care in how you position this. I believe the OSGi specs allow for
compliant open source implementations, but it is unlikely this
On 27 Jul 2010, at 12:11 , Ross Gardler wrote:
Are there any problems bringing these modules into the podling, managing them
under the same community but each having separate release cycles.
Apache Felix is one example of a project that consists of many modules, each
with their own release
Hello Les,
On May 23, 2010, at 19:21 , Les Hazlewood wrote:
To that end, I created such a guide that I hope will help people in the
future:
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/confluence-auto-export.html
Please feel free to comment and make suggestions. Hopefully this is
one less thing
+1. Accept LCF into the Incubator.
(non binding)
Sounds like a very useful project.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 (non binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
Looking forward to using such a unified API from within ACE.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
).
2. To distribute and configure enterprise OSGi application
components implemented to the enterprise OSGi application programming
model.
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/6 Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl:
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at
22:20 ,
Marcel
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at
22:20 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Relationships with Other Apache Projects
I know ACE is only in incubation, but is there a reason for not
mentioning it in this list? To me
programming model.
Regards, Graham.
2009/9/6 Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com:
Marcel,
I believe it was an oversight to have missed mentioning ACE.
Hopefully one
of the proposed committers will comment on this aspect.
thanks,
dims
On 09/06/2009 08:29 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
It probably
Hello Kevan,
On Sep 4, 2009, at 6:48 , Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Was a contact with Felix made prior to dropping the proposal here?
I got the
impression that wasn't the case, which I find surprising... If I am
wrong,
what was the meat of such?
On Sep 1, 2009, at 17:45 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
ACE is another podling related to OSGi and AFAIK it implements the
DeploymentAdmin OSGi spec.
Just to clear up any misconceptions:
ACE does not implement the DeploymentAdmin spec. That was donated to
Felix and ACE uses it.
ACE is an
On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
It is a goal of the Aries project to provide a natural home for open
source implementations of current and future OSGi EEG specifications,
including the opportunity for the collaborative development of
compliance tests, and an environment to
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:12 , ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with Bill that it's a good thing for the Incubator to clarify
best practices, and teach podlings to follow them even if older
projects sometimes don't. We
On Apr 23, 2009, at 23:15 , Karl Pauls wrote:
The vote is successful. Thanks to everyone involved. We will get the
ball rolling asap.
To inform everybody: Niclas created the Confluence space and Jira
issue tracker and some issues to document the next steps:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:39 , Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO this means using JIRA to record and track these documents and the
associated workflow. the easiest way to do this would be by finding a
way to allow contributors to submit an iCLA via JIRA. AIUI the
requirement for submission by fax,
Hello Jason,
On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:09 , Jason van Zyl wrote:
Equinox p2 was designed to replace the aging Update Manager in
Eclipse. It focusses on installing Eclipse-based applications from
scratch and updating them and can be extended to manage other types
of artifacts. If you look at the
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
