that's not half as fun as people setting their mailer to change the
reply-to: to the list and then sending personal mail...
;)
geir
Orlov, Alexander M wrote:
Folks,
I'm awfully sorry, that should have been personal letter. If you don't understand Russian just ignore it. If you understand
Anton Luht wrote:
Stefano,
- move 'harmonytest.org' source code in the harmony svn repository so
that others can work on it
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is
Don't pat my back. Stefano and Gregory hammered through some of the
latest cruft - I just followed the email thread and formalized and
committed the changes.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Good progress.
pat on back/
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have DRLVM+Classlib cleanly
://incubator.apache.org/harmony
$
How about running the tests? I can run java -version too. And even
run simple programs. It's the tests that show failures (not all, some)
geir
Thanks,
Pavel
On 11/17/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good progress.
pat on back/
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson
-2224 I
excluded failed tests from acceptance test set:
StackTest exception.FinalizerStackTest on EM64T
gc.LOS on Windows.
I'll go check this out immediately
geir
BR.
Pavel Afremov
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc, g++ and make:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get
My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also
trying to create another convention with VMI.
Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We are doing this to conform to some convention, right? If the
covention
thank you. I'm happy.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
from the admin section?
No, the notice is in here [1], in the section Export Notice. It is
predominantly boilerplate text.
The readme in the admin section is for 'us' harmony types to show why
that bis file
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] did go through, I think. That has been added as an
allow.
Can you try again?
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 11/17/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems, I was over-optimistic :(
To test notifications I add my email together with
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
and
Tim Ellison wrote:
Before you go off writing more code, just take a moment to look at
HARMONY-263 and tell us what you think of it.
It ties us to JUnit. Doesn't moving the exclude list upwards give us
more freedom?
geir
Thanks
Tim
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
It seems
isn't there a package manager that will let you fetch liblcms?
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
Just FYI: I was able to build Classlib + DRLVM on SLES 9 64-bit.
The only
All alone? Then as long as your employer doesn't consider it a work
for hire - IOW, if Intel doesn't think that they paid you to do this -
then you can contribute it yourself.
Please check with your manager.
If that is ok, then you can submit as a JIRA and as Tim noted, we'll put
in
I spoke too soon - do you mean reusing the code for managing the exclude
lists?
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Before you go off writing more code, just take a moment to look at
HARMONY-263 and tell us what you think of it.
It ties us to JUnit. Doesn't moving
You know someone is going to spin this... see, they even do all their
development discussion in Russian...
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Вы можете пойти здесь http://babelfish.altavista.com/. Будет сериями
потехи! Как наблюдать рыбу те велосипед. :-)
Time to get back to the code me thinks.
Tim
I grok this. I have no problem.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Thomas Hawtin wrote:
I had a quick browse through the Harmony SVN and spotted what appears to
be a vulnerability in the java.lang.ThreadLocal implementation. I have
briefly discussed this with Tim Ellison and Geir Magnusson Jr., off
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
sucking in all memory...
yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned
ok...
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also
trying to create another convention with VMI.
Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
Not really, since implementers have to hold on to our VMI function
struct
Hm. Ok - I just sent my own test. I do have it allowed. I'll try to
get this to work myself as spoofing from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see how it
works out...
geir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the [EMAIL
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Stefano,
It is a bit unfair to compare *debug* build of Harmony with other
release versions :)
I'm simulating what a journalist with a developer could do.
Our snapshots are built in release mode.
If there is a way to make it compile in
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc
remember, we have a page on the website that details this. The stuff
you see below is just for config... these were my notes, so the stuff at
the end should be removed...
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready
I put a wiki page up :
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Automated_Testing
(reachable from the front page) to capture how we track and govern the
community CI effort that build-test is intended to be.
So I didn't set out any rules other than someone who's interested has to
approach the
I put the notes I made on doing ubuntu 6 on a wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DevelopmentPlatformConfiguration
Please provide details for other platforms if you have them.
geir
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2224 I
excluded failed tests from acceptance test set:
StackTest exception.FinalizerStackTest on EM64T
gc.LOS on Windows.
I'll go check this out immediately
geir
BR.
Pavel Afremov
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL
I was hoping you wouldn't say that.
Time to modify the DRLVM build for testing.
sob
geir
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to disable tests.
I was disappointed in 2224 - I assumed
I'll throw up a wiki page on this, but here's where we are now. I
committed H-2224, which excluded stack tests on x86_64 (and LOS on windows)
c-unit tests : pass
smoke : pass (now that stack related are not run...)
kernel :
w/ jet
[junit] Test java.lang.ClassAnnotationsTest FAILED
the smallest commits is a waste of time. We
simply need to balance efficiency (targeted testing when you make a fix)
with the dedication to have a rapid response when the CI systems find a
problem.
geir
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/16/06
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think
from the admin section?
Tim Ellison wrote:
The bis_HARMONY.rdf file isn't actually shipped, it is just used to
generate the artefacts for the ASF webpages and US Gov e-mail. The
notice to our users is put in the readme that goes into our releases.
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote
please locally break something (IOW, no need to check in...), get CC to
send the message, so then we can all rest comfortably that failures do
lead to email.
geir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Thanks, today this test passed on both machines :( I hope, the CC will send
notification if this test
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Vladimir,
Sorry, I didn't follow discussions about build-and-test infra. I've done
check out of build-and-test workspace and I'm trying to set up it. I
have some questions:
- README.txt file says about downloading IBM VME and I guess you run CC on
DRL VM. Does the file
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/15, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder if there is any harm in deleting them?
1. Not all the JIRA users can delete attachements.
2. Sometimes history is good.
I agree #2. We can always fix #1.
Maybe then someone just writes down best practices
I dont' care, but as you said, have it search for both for now...
Tim Ellison wrote:
Oliver Deakin (JIRA) wrote:
[classlib][luni] Add creation of stub jvm.dll to luni module
Key: HARMONY-2201
URL:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum
stack size, doesn't it?
What does lower
Yes - that's why I was poking him to see the patch. I was going to
suggest something very similar.
geir
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
You can look at the change here
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2203
Could someone who knowns classlib native code
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x222 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Is this lib VM-specific?
No, er, yes, er, ... let me try to explain.
In the jre/bin/vm sub directories we have harmonyvm.dll's (which are
VM-specific), but we use the name and function export convention to code
against any compliant impl. The RI
to run with the fork mode once
it will be even faster...
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
why not?
Because the full-stack testing is appropriate for CI systems that are
running full-time to catch bugs. That's what our build-test
infrastructure
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
here is what I think Harmony needs:
- a logo [no feather BS, something cool and trendy that we could print
on mugs and t-shirts... and no duke crap either]
I was so hoping no one would suggest this...
- professionally-looking web pages
They're coming along
/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Does anyone care? This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
there.
Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Now I've written all that, I it's clear that we should roll the VMI
functions into the jvm.dll too, and get rid of vmi.dll. The jvm.dll
would export both sets of functions, i.e.
JNI_CreateJavaVM
JNI_GetCreatedJavaVMs
Chris Gray wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:39, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[...] (WTF does BSD licensing for a logo mean,
anyway?),
It means that you don't have to distribute the source code of the logo :-),
but it has to be accompanied by 200+ words of copyright notice and you can't
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 02:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: geirm
+!--
+ * FIXME : the following awful little hack is because we noticed
that for whatever + * reason, we can't link with libjpg.a on at
least to kinds of 65-bit linux + --
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Pavel,
The life started showing that you were correct. Today there were no
report on http://harmonytest.org. Even if I would like to be a living
notification, I couldn't.
Vladimir,
The thing which concerns me most is not an absence of results - I
believe this is just a
We now have DRLVM+Classlib cleanly building out of SVN and able to run
basic programs on Ubuntu 6 on an em64T box.
$ uname -a :
Linux harmony-em64t 2.6.15-27-amd64-generic #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 16
01:50:50 UTC 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Now starting to look into the test suite. Tests are
First test that fails is the most cherished and beloved StackTest, with
a segmentation fault :)
I'll try to find some more useful info...
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have DRLVM+Classlib cleanly building out of SVN and able to run
basic programs on Ubuntu 6 on an em64T box
bugs? We don't have bugs. They are contribution opportunities
:)
geir
Jin Mingjian wrote:
Good! Do you plan to add some bugs-related charts?
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Not surprising :-) The last big stack relatad checkin in 2018. Its comment
notes say that Gregory actually saw the failure of StackTest and the new
FinalizeStackTest...
So... lets fix them... :)
geir
On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First
what VM?
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot
reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9)
testcase
classname=org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest
temporarily. Sounds hard to
believe, I know...
On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Not surprising :-) The last big stack relatad checkin in 2018. Its
comment
notes say that Gregory actually saw the failure of StackTest and the
new
FinalizeStackTest
thx
Tim Ellison wrote:
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Tim Ellison
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation, The
w00t!
(the server has been heating my office... I can tell when Gump is
running as the fans spin up...)
geir
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
Yep!
Will enable the notications...
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise
I've allowed the mail through..
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The first problem is the lack of javac that bootstrap-ant requires.
Can you clarify what 'bootstrap-ant' requires? Is it running an Ant
javac task, or compiling Ant source with javac.exe? I was assuming
the latter.
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
I think that a problem with the junit tests is that some failures spit out
to the console, but show up in the test run results as passed. I find this
very confusing. So unless you are watching all the time, you can miss them.
We can't depend on this - they have to
I wonder if there is any harm in deleting them?
geir
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
I'm using All issue view. It shows all the comments and attachment
in time ordered way...
This helps. But marking attachments as obsolete will be better :)
SY, Alexey
2006/11/15, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like this approach.
+1
(it's exactly how I would have done it. :)
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
As part of solution for this issue the
*HARMONY-2197*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2197 was
created.
I suggest using the separate exclude list for each platform. I hope in this
case the
We should also take a hard look at how to do this in DRLVM as well...
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Seems, we says about different things :)
First of all, we have no TestNG (or other harness) yet but we need now
different exclude lists for different platforms.
Also, in my vision these exclude-lists
That's odd. The launcher should figure this out. I'll take a look in a
sec...
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:27 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps though.
I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any user modify
a JIRA and see what happens.
+1
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I
...and hysem_wait
is interrupted by the signal:
(gdb) p perror(sym_wait error:)
sym_wait error:: Interrupted system call
Do we have good (universal) solution for such cases?
Thanks
Evgueni
On 11/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
hmmm
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x222 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps
though. I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any
user modify
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/15/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could there be no limit to stack size??
Limit is there but it's too large, like 2 in power 46.
Is there a way the test framework could set this? Does DRLVM support
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum stack
size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think that it's the size of
the stack, max.
I thought it is a starting stack size
maybe we should put this in our regular NOTICE file?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tellison
Date: Wed Nov 15 14:11:04 2006
New Revision: 475458
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475458
Log:
Add readme with explanation of bis export file.
Added:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gshimansky
Date: Wed Nov 15 14:38:55 2006
New Revision: 475473
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475473
Log:
Allow the test to pass even
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM.
Yay!
There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other
special configurations, so the page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
build.sh script which runs tests (maybe only in case
Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with
everyone pitching in.
DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need
to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary),
as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone else race and beat them to it...
I'm not mad, but wanted to let you know.
I
sorry
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone else race and beat them to it...
I'm not mad, but wanted to let you know
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s
My bad. Sorry again. Please ignore.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
sorry
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone
(hysem_wait() != 0) {}. It helped to pass all tests.
Evgueni
On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
um... classlib uses SIGUSR2 as well? Doesn't our thread manager use it?
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
Hey,
Seems like the pretty old problem shows itself again. I'm talking
about
We now have a site
http://harmony.apache.org/
and there's a redirect from
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/
to there.
Tomorrow sometime we'll do the mail switch - that should be totally
transparent - new lists will be created, sub lists will be copied, and
mail going to old will be
Does anyone care? This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
there.
Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
geir
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with
everyone pitching in.
DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need
to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work
I'm doing that as we, er, speak.
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Seems like Harmony disappeared from the incubator page
but hasn't yet appeared on the apache.org page
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We now have a site
http://harmony.apache.org/
and there's a redirect from
done. will take a little while to propagate from stage to production...
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm doing that as we, er, speak.
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Seems like Harmony disappeared from the incubator page
but hasn't yet appeared on the apache.org page
2006/11/16, Geir
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have a site
http://harmony.apache.org/
and there's a redirect from
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/
to there.
Tomorrow sometime we'll do the mail switch - that should be totally
transparent - new lists will be created, sub
it's on it's way - it needs to propogate from minotaur, the staging
server, to the production server. it's automatic on some schedule I
don't actually remember...
Spark Shen wrote:
Jimmy, Jing Lv 写道:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have a site
http://harmony.apache.org/
and there's
Tim Ellison wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote:
BTW, I asked my dad to look at the website. Ideas for improvement from
him:
snip
This is loverly -- kudos to you.
When I asked my mum about class unloading support she just said 'what?'
Well, my grandmother felt that it was a bug in the GC, and should
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:45 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting started with DRL is
outdated
Additional terms from the Database ? LOL
Just get rid of it all. Those
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Hi all,
I've updated formatting of definition lists DL on site:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2173
The new formatting looks more natural to me; the screenshots can be found in
the JIRA issue.
yes, that looks better.
When editing site.css I
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
One reason would be is that I don't know ant well enough to redesign
the whole stuff all together. I used the existing setup and init
targets which take care of including ancontrip and cctask jars.
If you ask me
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check that test doesn't crash VM
Mika Miettinen wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:51 Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I'm going to try to do this on my Gentoo at home now. It is mostly
bleeding edge up to date installation.
Now I see what you're talking about. The threading library of classlib
:
On the 0x220 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
I have a dumb question - I was playing today with a toy launcher for
DRLVM working out some embedding issues, and for the life of me, I
couldn't get dgb to ever let me break on anything in a shared library.
I loaded the vm via dlopen
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
hmmm strange. The patch was tested on multi-processor system
running SUSE9. I will check if the patch misses something. Anyway, we
need to wait with the patch submission until we 100% sure how
hythread_monitor_init should behave.
Thanks
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps though.
I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any user
modify a JIRA and see what happens.
geir
Sian January wrote:
Hi,
I have just
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask?
We have a running SVN-Git mirroring via tailor, and some people
prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git
1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline.
(I do not
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'm happy to report that both classlib and drlvm at r474892 build on
x86_64/em64t
As Gregory suggested, I had to change the symlinks to from
/usr/lib/lib(jpeg|png).a to /usr/lib/lib(jpeg|png).so in order for the
link to avoid complaining.
Bleah. This can't be the
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I've tried to run the VM launcher and I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~/src/harmony/drlvm/build/lnx_em64t_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin $ ./java
Harmony Java launcher
Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2006 The Apache
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'm happy to report that both classlib and drlvm at r474892 build on
x86_64/em64t
As Gregory suggested, I had to change the symlinks to from
/usr/lib/lib(jpeg|png).a to /usr/lib/lib(jpeg|png).so in order for the
link to avoid complaining.
Congratulations! Nice work!
geir
(I heart Japitools)
Stuart Ballard wrote:
I'm thrilled to be able to announce four things:
1) After far too long a wait, Japitools 0.9.7 Life, liberty[1] and
the pursuit of Japiness has been released.
This release includes the following improvements over
Java.
geir
在 06-11-13，Geir Magnusson Jr.[EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道：
Jin Mingjian wrote:
GPL is not very compatible with Apache License. So, I guess Sun want
to prevent Harmony from using any codes they owned?! Very Very Very...
No - it was simply about control.
geir
在 06-11-13，LvJimmy
as well:) Whatever, this is big step for
Java community.
在 06-11-13，Geir Magnusson Jr.[EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道：
Jin Mingjian wrote:
But does Apache License make JDK out of control? I don't think so:)
I think that it just means that it helps them limit the number of
proprietary forks of the code
Patch applied - please test
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I deleted the file and added it to the ignore property.
For those of us poor souls not using SVN directly
this deletion broke the build, as the file version_svn_tag.h
is not available directly now.
The issue HARMONY-2168
1 - 100 of 2755 matches
Mail list logo
