Okay let me get this straight.
It's "okay" to use fake clients as long as you aren't using them as
hard as the other guy.
It's "okay" to not use proper tags on your server as long as you
aren't lying too much.
It's "okay" to bend the rules just because, like, Valve isn't fair and
they should mak
Lotus and Skial both run clean servers. I can personally vouch for Lotus as
I not long ago played there all the time. Some other communities though, on
the other hand..
Let's just hope Fletcher and Co do something about the reports I and others
have made sooner rather than later.
_
ou do.
I sincerely apologize and I should of contacted you about the issue first.
- Original Message -
From: bottige...@gmail.com
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:03:12 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effec
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:41:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
> tags OK?
>
>
>
> Disable bots.
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:40:26 -0400
>> From: pettit.t...@gmail.com
>> To: hlds@list.valvesoftwar
There are reports of it. I think I googled it some time ago and it's been a
bug for a few years now. It happens if you set the bots to join the server
without humans. Let me see if I can find it.
http://forum.i3d.net/hlds-valve-windows-newsletter/153873-hlds-bug-bots-attack-defense-respawn-times.h
8:41:38 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without tags
OK?
Disable bots.
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:40:26 -0400
> From: pettit.t...@gmail.com
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Resp
Disable bots.
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:40:26 -0400
> From: pettit.t...@gmail.com
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
> tags OK?
>
> If you can point me to where this is cited and a fix I
31, 2012 8:24:54 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
You probably have bots. As I said, bots mess with the spawn times.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Todd Pettit < pettit.t...@gmail.com > wrote:
Ok, I might be way off base here th
times are default. Am I missing something?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Essay Tew Phaun"
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" <
> hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:15:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [hld
ed Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:15:17 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Should probably stop. This thread has a lot of valid complaints and some good
thoughts. Let'
Should probably stop. This thread has a lot of valid complaints and some
good thoughts. Let's not ruin it completely.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
; <
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com >
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:28:56 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without tags
OK?
Skial is fully complaint with the policy of truth. I have to ask
whether you are familiar with the fact that a default respawn
The mailing list isn't the place for petty fights between your
"communities", please take it elsewhere.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Essay Tew Phaun wrote:
> Well, I'm too good to die 40 times in a row, so there would be no way for me
> to figure out.
>
> :)
>
> _
t are the chances of the blu
> respawn time being 8 seconds 40x in a row? Call out these hacks.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: bottige...@gmail.com
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" <
> hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>
> Sent: Tues
Well, I'm too good to die 40 times in a row, so there would be no way for
me to figure out.
:)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
seconds 40x in a row? Call out these hacks.
- Original Message -
From: bottige...@gmail.com
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:28:56 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
plugin doesn't make you
compliant.
- Original Message -
From: bottige...@gmail.com
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:28:56 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Skial is
Maybe they should get whoever is writing those novel length blog posts to
take 10 minutes to survey some of the servers reported for fake clients.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valve
it would be pretty snazzy to see fast respawn not penalized as
severely as long as the tag was present. Someone a bit earlier back
posted a nicely written observance that summarily stated this:
If you run a community and pay it attention, have good admins, are an
enjoyable personality(s), then
t; If you don't know the speed limit does that excuse you from a speeding
> ticket? NO!
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "E. Olsen"
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:46:26 PM
> S
you sure are in violation. I submitted the report to
Valve.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Simon"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:05:31 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn wi
Bull! Since when? This afternoon. What a crock!
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Simon"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:05:31 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
You're making the assumption that because people are here complaining about
servers and communities breaking a policy that we have servers dead 24/7.
It's just quite annoying having communities outright breaking the policy,
getting reported (multiple times) and still nothing is done about it. I
kn
Okay, seriously guys, this list's occupants are great most of the time,
but sometimes a thread makes me feel like I'm on the World of Warcraft
forums.
Speculation is fun and all, but until an official statement comes in,
that's all it can be: Speculation.
Just please, before posting, think a
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "E. Olsen"
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" <
> hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:46:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn with
from populated servers to seek out a compliant server.
- Original Message -
From: "ics"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:41:23 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without tags
OK?
M
Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:40 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn
without tags OK?
So in light of what you just implied on 32 slot servers running fast
respawn and faking it, i had my own 30 slot servers forcibly turned t
;
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:29:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Yeah I kind of feel like an outright ban for the spawn timing thing is slightly
overkill. But, at
- Original Message -
From: "ics"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:40 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without tags
OK?
So in light of what you just implied on 32 slot
does that excuse you from a speeding ticket?
NO!
- Original Message -
From: "E. Olsen"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:46:26 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
t
and send a message.
- Original Message -
From: "Essay Tew Phaun"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:29:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Yeah I kind of f
I just think people have to be careful in thinking that everything comes
down to back & white. I'll give you a specific example:
A few months ago when I had the fast respawn plugin we use re-written by a
Sorucemod coder to insure it added the proper sv_tags, an error was
introduced that went unnot
the major violators
and send a message.
- Original Message -
From: "Essay Tew Phaun"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:29:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags
Yeah I kind of feel like an outright ban for the spawn timing thing is
slightly overkill. But, at the same time, this policy has been in place
long enough to where you would think there aren't any Admins/Owners who
aren't aware of it. That seems to make it more of a foul in my opinion.
What I'm re
a ticket.
- Original Message -
From: "E. Olsen"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:52:00 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Meh - I think "delisting/ba
Fair thing would be following the rules that Valve has placed in.
Obviously there always will be rulebreakers but their numbers would
significantly decrease either by temporarely punishements or by more
permanent.
Obviously there will be those who get banned and say "Valve killed our
servers"
Meh - I think "delisting/banning" servers for merely altered spawn times is
killing a mosquito with a sledgehammer. Remove them from quickplay? Sure -
why not...but if their only "violation" (which, I would guess, many server
operators are ignorant of) is changing spawn times, then the thing that
p
mp_respawnwatimes "3" to a map config and
then the reporting is handled for you.
- Original Message -
From: "ics"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:29:31 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect?
Olsen"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:25:23 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
The point is - that's impossible to do fairly. We DO run that plugin, but on
the maps
Message -
From: "ics"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:15:41 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without tags
OK?
I think that these plugins that Todd posted are really breaking the rules o
It's failrly easy. If you enable that plugin that breaks the rules, you
disable quickplay traffic with cvar tf_server_identity_disable_quickplay
1. In that case, you do not break the rules.
How can you expect Valve to save you if the plugin creators are ignorant
of their rules. What you are as
The point is - that's impossible to do fairly. We DO run that plugin, but
on the maps where it is disabled (i.e. "sm_respawn_time_enabled "0") that
plugin is technically still RUNNING, but since fast respawn is disabled,
the sv_tag is not set.
See my point - you can't just poll a bunch of servers
don't care.
- Original Message -
From: "E. Olsen"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:58:23 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Of course I agree that rules sh
I think that these plugins that Todd posted are really breaking the
rules of quickplay and the owners should be punished accordingly. They
might not do it willingly, might have just grabbed a plugin and now know
about the rules of quickplay. Then again, if they registered their
servers to recei
Olsen, it sounds more to me like you've been building your community for a
while, possibly even before Quickplay and have a very solid group of
players. Nowadays, most veteran TF2 players have their own community
servers they visit. I'd wager a guess to say it's nearly impossible to
build a server
Of course I agree that rules should apply to everyone equally.
However, saying that a "*a 32 player server using mp_respawnwavetimes has
no chance against violators of the policy.*" isn't even remotely true. I'm
looking at 10 of my servers that are full (32-players) right now that have
the followi
the rules should apply to us
all.
- Original Message -
From: "Phillip Vector"
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:28:56 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
They ha
I'd generally agree with you on everything other than fake players that are
specifically designed to FOOL the system that decides whether players
should be sent to it in the first place. No players? No problem, we'll load
Fake Players. If no one reports those servers for breaking a policy,
nothing
rver mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:38:36 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth Still in effect? Fast Respawn without
tags OK?
Yeah - let's not start saying that simply using that plugin is in violation of
the rules, bud. We run it, but we have modified it to insu
They have the choice. It's called the server browser.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:21 AM, E. Olsen wrote:
> This is where, IMHO, Valve is sending the wrong message with Quickplay.
> While I fully understand that they created and optimized the game for 24
> players, and they want to push people to p
That's what the "server score" system is for. If player's constantly leave
a server as soon as they are placed in it, that server's score will rapidly
decline, and it will get less and less traffic - which is the best way to
do it. Valve has had the wisdom to (for the most part) allow the players t
This is why I think there should be a Modded game tag for the servers.
Or at least some tag for the major plugins. i.e. Saxton Hale, Freak
Fortress. The fact is that were not trying to scoop up players into a
mode that they don't want to be in as they will instantly leave.
On 7/31/2012 10:38 A
I think he was just saying the ones that do not modify the tags correctly
are breaking the rules.
>
>
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Yeah - let's not start saying that simply using that plugin is in violation
of the rules, bud. We run it, but we have modified it to insure the
"respawn_times" is added to the server browser when it is enabled (we also
add the "noquickplay" tag for good measure). Running that plugin is NOT a
violat
Yeah this kind of thing I consider a 'minor' violation. Similar to someone
winding up on a Saxton Hale server and it's on a stock map. It'd be really
hard for them to actively monitor for this. Fake players on the other hand..
I've sent several reports to Fletcher about some servers and he has
ack
I am aware that a couple months ago several servers were de-listed for 6
weeks for using FakeClients and Bot plugins.
I am curious though if there is every going to be any enforcement of this
part of the policy:
"· Interfering with the mechanisms that advertise modifications to gameplay
rules in
: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
(hlds_li...@list.valvesoftware.com)
Cc: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
(hlds@list.valvesoftware.com)
Subject: [hlds] Policy of truth
Last week the TF2 team banned some server groups that were in violation of the
Policy of
They have never shared detailed information which servers/groups break
the rules and i doubt they ever will. But this is awesome news anyway
for everyone who stands in clear waters with their own servers.
-ics
18.5.2012 3:36, Cameron Munroe kirjoitti:
is there a page listing these groups?
On
is there a page listing these groups?
On May 17, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Fletcher Dunn wrote:
> Last week the TF2 team banned some server groups that were in violation of
> the Policy of Truth.
>
> We received numerous complaints from server operators about a handful of
> servers, and we investigate
Last week the TF2 team banned some server groups that were in violation of the
Policy of Truth.
We received numerous complaints from server operators about a handful of
servers, and we investigated those reports. Any action we have taken was based
upon violations that we witnessed firsthand.
Custom servers add great additional elements of gameplay that many new
players are in some ways being driven away from because so many of them
stick to the quickplay list. I'm pretty sure we can all admit that the
server browser can be intimidating, thousands of servers, with only a
smidgen of
-
>
> *From:* **hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com** [mailto:**
> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com**] *On Behalf Of *1nsane
> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2012 5:56 PM
>
> *To:* **Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list**
> *Subject:* Re: [hlds] Policy of Tru
re.com] On Behalf Of 1nsane
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 5:56 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
And how many are connections to idle or trade servers? :P
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Cc2iscooL wrote:
Quoted from Fletcher on the subject of
currently showing up on my server list and that would help
>> even more.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Just my 2-cents. Your thoughts?
>>
>> - Mike
>>
>> ** **
>> --
>>
>> *From:* **hlds-boun...@l
would help
> even more.
>
> ** **
>
> Just my 2-cents. Your thoughts?
>
> - Mike
>
> ** **
> --
>
> *From:* **hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com** [mailto:**
> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com**] *On Behalf Of *E. Olsen
> *Sen
ike
_
From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of E. Olsen
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 2:59 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
Yeah - let's not paint communities whose membe
/24. We too dislike the kicking reserved slots.
> >>>
> >>> --Gavin "Benny Hill" L from the Crit Sandvich Network
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Invalid Protocol
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> As
ost of them simply sell something (access to reserved slot, immunity
>>>> during humiliation round etc…) for real money and call this a donation.
>>>> Also, as far as I know, No Heroes servers can kick a player to free a slot
>>>> for a “donator”
>>>> (http
ervers can kick a player to free a slot
>>> for a “donator” (
>>> http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1531500), so in
>>> their case is “pay to play” instead “pay to win”.
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valv
;> their case is “pay to play” instead “pay to win”.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
>> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *E. Olsen
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 05, 2012 12:59 AM
>>
>> *To:* Half-
php?t=1531500), so in
> their case is “pay to play” instead “pay to win”.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *E. Olsen
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 05, 2012 12:59 AM
>
>
-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of E. Olsen
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 12:59 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
Yeah - let's not paint communities whose members donate to support their
servers as something negative. Comm
Yeah - let's not paint communities whose members donate to support their
servers as something negative. Community supported servers are as old as pc
gaming itself. Not all communities that are member-supported are "pay to
win". We sure as hell aren't.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, ics wrote:
>
No offense there bud but a good community doesn't need fake clients to keep
their servers full.
On May 4, 2012 3:29 PM, "shawn" wrote:
> Personally, I kinda feel cheated by all of this...Valve asked us to get
> rid of our fake playercount plugin (that actually kept our servers full),
> we did, an
So what about servers that never have run fake player plugin, never have
asked donations or never had given fake hats or anykind of that sort of
stuff to players to wear. How come those servers can have them full of
players before and after if you cannot without any "dirty" tricks?
-ics
4.5.2
t;> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
>>>> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *proto type
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2012 7:58 PM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailin
Personally, I kinda feel cheated by all of this...Valve asked us to get
rid of our fake playercount plugin (that actually kept our servers
full), we did, and now most of our servers are empty...
Before that, we raised money by asking for donations, and gave donators
access to hats on JUST our
ieved from Valve.**
>>> **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
>>> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *proto type
>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2012 7:58 PM
>>>
>>> *T
** **
>>
>> *From:* hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
>> hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *proto type
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2012 7:58 PM
>>
>> *To:* Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
>> *Subject:* Re: [hlds] Policy
ed Win32 server mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
>
> ** **
>
> Feels like they penalized some servers not the others. Groups like Lotus
> and ProTF2 are not only running BOTS and fakeclients but ProTF2 is also
&
...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of proto type
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 7:58 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
Feels like they penalized some servers not the others. Groups like Lotus and
ProTF2 are not only running BOTS and fakeclients but ProTF2 is
#x27;s TOS. The way I look at it is if
> Valve wanted hat effects out, they would have done so during the hatless
> update.
>
> --
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:58:14 -0400
> From: prototypefr...@gmail.com
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject:
..@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Policy of Truth??
Feels like they penalized some servers not the others. Groups like Lotus and
ProTF2 are not only running BOTS and fakeclients but ProTF2 is also using
credit mod which i thought was against Valve's TOS.
On
None of that stuff makes much sense to me. Frankly, it sounds like way too
much work.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:58 PM, proto type wrote:
> Feels like they penalized some servers not the others. Groups like Lotus
> and ProTF2 are not only running BOTS and fakeclients but ProTF2 is also
> using cre
Feels like they penalized some servers not the others. Groups like Lotus
and ProTF2 are not only running BOTS and fakeclients but ProTF2 is also
using credit mod which i thought was against Valve's TOS.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, E. Olsen wrote:
> I'm really not sure why people act surpris
I'm really not sure why people act surprised when they get penalized for
these things. Fletcher was pretty clear what kinds of things they would be
penalizing for: Fake clients, making bots look like real players, and
failing to set the correct tags when you have fast respawn enabled.
We were guil
CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME!!!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, ics wrote:
> Valve did not punish from running fake clients, they still don't. It's
> some sort of compromise (which i don't really understand as a community
> that puts effort into running servers will have full servers an
They don't have to report. Every time that client connects to a server,
the server cannot lie to Valve any longer. If data from client vs server
differs, they will know about it. They just haven't acted upon it much
lately.
PS: if someone from Valve reads this, you cannot report do a report by
Valve did not punish from running fake clients, they still don't. It's
some sort of compromise (which i don't really understand as a community
that puts effort into running servers will have full servers anyway).
-ics
4.5.2012 19:29, Charles Mabbott kirjoitti:
In a nutshell:
When the policy
The FBI has already been scrambled dude. It's too late. Hide yo kids and
hide yo wife, OP is releasing his videos on the YouTubes.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Charles Mabbott
wrote:
> In a nutshell:
>
> When the policy of Truth was enacted, TF2 servers that were hiding bots,
> Fake Client
Are people actually reporting these servers to valve?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
In a nutshell:
When the policy of Truth was enacted, TF2 servers that were hiding bots,
Fake Client counts and so forth were removed from the server browser, the
OP server community was effectively removed because of this.
This admin is now pissed since he can find other servers in the browser
th
I think you guys are possibly focusing too much on the OP. I had a
discussion a few days ago with an admin from a different very large
community about this topic. I do not believe that this is specific to
Wonka Gaming. My interpretation of these events is that: because the
Policy of Truth is not
I second this; would really love to understand what OP was going on about.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:42 AM, jainil shah wrote:
> can somebody tl:dr what op is trying to say?
> sorry, i am not a tf2 player. i operate cs 1.6 servers.
>
> this thread as been buzzing my phone alot and now i wanna kno
Someone complaining about his server getting deleted under policy of truth.
On May 4, 2012 11:42 AM, "jainil shah" wrote:
> can somebody tl:dr what op is trying to say?
> sorry, i am not a tf2 player. i operate cs 1.6 servers.
>
> this thread as been buzzing my phone alot and now i wanna know wha
can somebody tl:dr what op is trying to say?
sorry, i am not a tf2 player. i operate cs 1.6 servers.
this thread as been buzzing my phone alot and now i wanna know whats going
on
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:39 AM, EvilMacGuyver wrote:
> I would buy a ticket to watch this but I know the match would
I would buy a ticket to watch this but I know the match would only last a
minute.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jethro Seabridge wrote:
> And Wonka Gaming get to call the FBI to scramble their network.
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Itaku wrote:
>
>> I think there is only one appropria
And Wonka Gaming get to call the FBI to scramble their network.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Itaku wrote:
> I think there is only one appropriate action to this entire thing.
>
> Valve employees vs Wonka Gaming in an arena match.
>
> And Valve gets to use the Valve weapons.
> On May 4, 2012
I think there is only one appropriate action to this entire thing.
Valve employees vs Wonka Gaming in an arena match.
And Valve gets to use the Valve weapons.
On May 4, 2012 7:40 AM, "zach isaac" wrote:
> Well would you look at the time. *Looks at his watch, revealing its
> banhammer o'clock*
>
Well would you look at the time. *Looks at his watch, revealing its
banhammer o'clock*
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:02 PM, admin wrote:
> *Is Policy of Truth still in effect? Because I see users with fakeclient
> spoof + bot join time running *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *ON WELL OVER 80 SERVERS*
> *
> *
> *
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
