Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:06 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] How many IFLs on my box?
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Marcy
Tony wrote:
The number of IFL's available to the VM LPAR can also be specified in the
HMC, is that skewing your numbers?
I suspect this is why ILMT can't count all by itself and needs us to tell it.
Marcy
I failed to mention that I wanted it from z/VM or Linux programmatically :(
I do have a nice spreadsheet from our cap folks who do the Resource Link thing.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Feller, Paul
Sent:
Thanks Leland!
I will post back the definitive answers when we get our questions answered
about those parameters.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Leland Lucius
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:47 PM
To:
locations for this software kinda suck wind.
It is relocatable, though, although awkwardly, since each sub-component
has to be individually relocated via either env vars, or parameters in
the install response file.
-- Pat
On 08/01/2011 05:42 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
I'm a little afraid
, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Thanks Patrick and Bob!
We also have a PMR open to clarify how to specify those parameters
about processors.
Would you be kind enough to let me know what you hear back from IBM
about this, please?
Yes, it does seem like very odd install location (/var!) and will
probably
PMR 43790,379,000 at sev 2 as advised by our IBM tech advocate person.
It contains about a dozen questions about this agent, including the /etc/ files
and /var/itlm default.
Hopefully others send in theirs as well! (hint hint hint).
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM
Here is one answer:
Q. What is the rationale behind installing the agent into /var?
Indications are that it is possible to modify the default installation
location. Is this advisable?
Ans.
===
Recommend to keep the default location BUT you can change the default
locations.
: [IBMVM] anyone running ILMT?
I always hate it when someone answers my last question and blows off the first
:-)
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Here is one answer:
Q. What is the rationale behind installing the agent into /var
I'm a little afraid of this new agent :)
It's supposed to monitor IBM licenses of SW.
But apparently isn't smart enough to get what it needs out of /proc/sysinfo and
you have to tell it how many IFLs you have and whether they are shared.
And if you change the number of IFLs:
Updating the
That'd be my choice too. If I had one.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any
information
Another option would be a CP SEND command from a VM user that was SECUSER to
the linux console. You have to alter /etc/inittab to have root logged in at
boot.
Marcy. Sent from my BlackBerry.
- Original Message -
From: Davis, Larry (National VM/VSE Capability)
. Sent from my BlackBerry.
From: Scott Rohling [mailto:scott.rohl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 05:27 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM to zLinux Remote Execution
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor
We used to have them on sep vlan/subnet/OSA, primarily because z/VM didn't
support Layer 2 and LACP before 5.4. We now have it on the same vswitch.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lemuel Raciles Deza
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 4:54 AM
Nice Holiday gift for your favorite old mainframer
http://www.20x200.com/art/2009/04/ibm-360-model-30-tape-drives-1965.html
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
Don't know if you all saw this.
I was hoping that when IBM bought them, they might enhance the VM product.
Instead, they killed it. Sigh.
--
The purpose of this email is to advise
You might have more luck on the Linux-390 list than IBMVM.
Not sure how to help you. Works fine for us under SLES 11 SP1.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bob McCarthy
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:14 PM
To:
Bleah.. and Yuck.
NO NO NO.
What's the point of putting 1 file in a SFS if you can't share it anyway???
Put it on a minidisk. 1 cyl is fine.
And maybe when I have SSI , I can actually share it.
It's 7 4k blocks of config data. Maybe IBM was trying to save me the other 96%
of a cylinder by
, June 24, 2011 12:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question on SHUTDOWNTIME
On Thursday, 06/23/2011 at 07:06 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the
shutdown
process.
I recall hearing
: Friday, June 24, 2011 2:24 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] RMSMASTR and shutdowns
On Friday, 06/24/2011 at 04:31 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Bleah.. and Yuck.
NO NO NO.
What's the point of putting 1 file in a SFS if you can't share it
anyway
They have updated it to allow it to not die when it finds a device that doesn't
exist on the system it was IPL'd on. We now just put all of the Dr and
failover systems's VTS addresses in the config and need only one file now.
Marcy Cortes
Operating Systems Engineer, z/VM and Linux on System z
Hack?!? That's what UCOMDIR/SCOMDIR were designed for and why CMS
manages APPC the way it does. FIlepool references in CMS are, by design,
symbolic destination names. If you don't have a COMDIR entry, you get the
defaults (e.g. TPN = symbolic name).
Look at it this way. I don't want to
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] RMSMASTR and shutdowns
On Friday, 06/24/2011 at 05:46 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Look at it this way. I don't want to have to have some VM guy with 30
years of
experience needed to figure out where I put the config file
On Friday, 06/24/2011 at 04:31 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Bleah.. and Yuck.
NO NO NO.
What's the point of putting 1 file in a SFS if you can't share it
anyway???
Put it on a minidisk. 1 cyl is fine.
And maybe when I have SSI , I can actually share
Out of the box, RMSMASTR behaves very badly on a signal shutdown of your VM
system.
We have to use this to mount tapes in the VTS.
RMSMASTR has files in VMSYSU: and VMSYS:, which both use signal shutdown by
default.
RMSMASTR hangs up the shutdown of VMSYS: until your system default shutdown
The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown
process.
I recall hearing that is good default.
We are seeing systems exceed that - 33 seconds in this one that seemed to come
with bonus messages (that is our SW seemed to capture the HCPWRP963I's on this
one).
? That seems to be taking a full 30 seconds to terminate..
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.commailto:marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown
process.
I recall hearing
. -- former U.S.
Representative Anthony Wiener, during his resignation speech
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 16:05
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Question
Congratulations and best of luck to you, Richard! The VM community loses a
very long standing member indeed!
Marcy
Agree. Those who have HA needs have more than one VM system to which to move
the workload.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 11:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
z196: Performance: 2714887 REXX clauses per second
z10:Performance: 1732967 REXX clauses per second
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of peter.w...@ttc.ca
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 7:02 AM
To:
I have him. You can't :)
Marcy
Is z/OS in another LPAR on the same box?
If so, it's easiest just to let them do it and VM will just see the changes.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Michael Coffin
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
You don't get the full time if done from the HW.
4-5 minutes - somewhere around there I believe is what you get.
Could that be what you saw?
It's not enough to get all of our severs down so we always take them down
outside of the HW/GDPS deactivate.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
A2 wrote:
The delay from the HMC used to be 0 (e.g. no delay) and
was changed in z10(?) to be hardcoded at 5 minutes. The z196 with HMC
2.11 may allow this value to be customized; I'm not sure
Yeah, that's what we experienced - 5 min on a z10, but 30sec for CP so 4:30 max
for Linux. Not
Terry wrote:
I know this was discussed awhile back, but is there any compelling
reason why I need to go to z/VM 6.1 for a z196
install? The more I read about z/VM 6.1 it seems that most of the
enhancements are covered under z/VM 5.4 at the latest
level. But I just wanted to make sure that
200, 21244
Engineering Computing
Mainframe Support
Cell - 443 632-4191
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 vs z/VM 6.1
Call your IBM CE!
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 11:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] VM TCP/IP I/O error?
Greetings,
This morning we received the following message on the
Phil, I'll 2nd your opinion that 4 systems in the SSI is meager. I'm already
in a quandary there with 4 prod systems and capacity planning asking where we
put the next ones. So now I'm not sure if we step into SSI with all 4 or have
to immediately start with 2 plexes. If two, we're giving up
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 11:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] zvm directions
On Wednesday, 05/18/2011 at 12:07 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 11:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zvm directions
On Wednesday, 05/18/2011 at 12:07 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
I
No, nor announced. It's statement of direction thus far. Might not even be
called 6.2 perhaps :)
But go to share.org and look at the Anaheim - Franciscovich 8453.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Austin, Alyce
I think you need the 3326.
FICON Express8 10KM LX (FC 3325)
All the channels on a single FICON Express8 10KM LX feature are the same type,
10KM LX. FICON Express8 10KM LX utilizes a long wavelength (LX) laser as the
optical transceiver and supports use of a 9 micron single mode fiber optic cable
How full is your page space? (Q ALLOC PAGE).
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bhemidhi, Ashwin
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 8:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Problem with z/Linux guest
Be sure your guest isn't dropping into the eligible list.
That can look like a network problem.
Issue ind q to see if it is there and q srm or consult your performance
monitor.
SRM STORBUFF setting default is too low for Linux workloads on z/VM so
hopefully that has bumped up.
Marcy
From:
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:46 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM VTAM Question
I think you are right Ivan.
I just tried it.
Vtam prefix has to be on the Vtam
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM Question
Wow the problem was the comma. I removed it and it worked. Thank you very
much!
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:00 PM
I'm pretty sure it's
vtam r 00,ignore
It's been a long while though!
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:28 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM Question
On 4/28/2011 5:46 AM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's
vtam r 00,ignore
It's been a long while though!
Marcy
Isn't 'reply' a standard GCS command (part of the OS emulation in GCS)
In which case, it would definitely be 'r 00,ignore
David wrote:
Not like the VM/SP days...8-)
Some of us exploiting new things are having VM/SP moments :)
I just want a CP Query that tells me about the running system. It's a *bad
thing* when one thinks they have applied a PTF after scheduling an IPL and
finding it not on later. Bad things
We don't want it part of SES, at least not the SES that exists today.
We may be faced with a requirement that other group installs our changes or
at least signs off on them.
Joe Operator needs to be able to confirm that PTF UMx is installed. I
don't want him on MAINT.
I want him to issue
I'd still like a CP QUERY command to query to see if a particular PTF is
applied to your *running* nucleus.
Don't care about CMS or GCS needing to do that, because those are always
fixable without getting the world involved.
TCPIP would be nice too, but not as important as CP.
Marcy
I think you can say best practice is on a need to know basis. This is
especially important for some industries :) You really can't say you have a
security system in place if something else can get there without it going
through that security system.
Does z/OS *need* to access your disk?
Yes, we are. In a test environment at the moment.
Under z/VM 5.4 at current maintenance.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use, copy, disclose, or take any
It's hard enough to herd cats and when we finally have them all marching toward
summer 2011, someone buys a new machine 9 months before that date and moves
your cheese
Now if it were compiled for later than a z9 maybe it could exploit these shiny
new boxes better :)
And if we could only
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:30 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] SLES 9 on a z/196?
On 3/30/2011 at 01:24 AM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Now
Right, your vswitch and nicdef statements don't change.You may have to put
a vlan on your SET VSWITCH GRANT statements.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, March
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 10:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux
Right, your vswitch and nicdef statements don't change.You may have to put
Happened to watch operations today in a disaster test...
Typing vary on proc 01 vary on proc 02...
Is a bit tedious when you've got more than a handful.
How about a VARY ON PROC ALL ?
(Yes, I gave him a pipe command and yes we can do this in an exec), but it
would be nice if the CP
for Dummies book somewhere?
It seems to be a universal panacea and people, like Marcy here, just magically
pluck these things out of thin air as though it were common knowledge.
Where are the cheat sheets?
Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
Actually, the latest version of zPDT does support zVM's Virtual Coupling.
It does not require any underlying hardware support and it works reasonably
well (I've run some tests on our systems).
Well that's pretty cool!
Marcy
Tom, I doubt you'll be able to use VM's virtual coupling facility if you don't
have the underlying HW support for it. It actually grabs the CF stuff out of
the HW and runs that in a virtual machine.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
:
Ý OK ¨
Thanks,
Steve.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:50
Linux can display it too, even as a vm class g guest.
cat /proc/sysinfo
snip
LPAR CPUs Total: 8
LPAR CPUs Configured: 6
LPAR CPUs Standby:0
LPAR CPUs Reserved: 2
LPAR CPUs Dedicated: 0
LPAR CPUs Shared: 6
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Keep it under 50%. We target about 40%. There's a knee on that there curve
you don't want to stumble upon.
Spread over as many LCU's as you can. And use the full vol for page (minus cyl
0).
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Do a
vmcp q v dasd
If it shows r/w and is still not working, log the guest off and back on.
If it works then, that would indicate it is some kind of RH problem and Linux
was confused.
If it still does not work, check the VM Operator log for any write inhibit HCP*
error messages. That would
Are there any additional messages in /var/log/messages when he attempts the
mount command?
You can start spooling your console immediately with
vmcp spool cons \* start (prefix the * with \ from Linux )
You might be getting some messages either on the console or on the
/var/log/messages when
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:57 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z196 lb4ul
Right,
You would redefine it like this
define vswitch lnxvsw1 rdev 9004.p01
Or play it safe and put
But it is! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto,_Kansas
I kind of doubt it has 2 airports with a pop of 312.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of August Carideo
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 7:24 AM
To:
If z/VM could be installed on any model of 3390-3 or greater, why would
they say that it could only be installed on a MOD-3 or a MOD-9? To me
that means that their install process is model specific. So why?
A disk with 32760 cylinders is a model 9. Model 27 is just a short hand way of
Jim wrote The more I read about CP SET SHARE the more I suspect it isn't
designed to be a panacea for smooth performance in time of trouble.
You are right - it is not.
We don't run test guests on production LPARs.
Actually, we don't run test LPARs on production z boxes.
Actually, we don't run
TO SY90TEST 9061 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 13 OSD
OSA 930E ATTACHED TO SY90TEST 9062 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 13 OSD
OSA 930F ATTACHED TO SY80TEST 907F DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 13 OSD
OSA 935F ATTACHED TO SY80TEST 935F DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 13 OSD
Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
Paul wrote:
Look out for PORT number depending on the type of OSA cards you have access
to.
Good point!
We had one that was inadvertently cabled to P01 too.
We changed the vswitch def rather than move the cable.
Good luck George!
Marcy
If you have all the maintenace on from a o/s perspective you'll be fine. I
can't answer for the HW team here or ops but I've heard no complaints.
We've had one in dev test for about 4 months now.
Marcy. Sent from my BlackBerry.
From: Scott Rohling [mailto:scott.rohl...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Ah soft abends! We had figured out the first part but the second was a
mystery.
Thanks! (Marcy for Bob in beautiful Charlotte today)
Marcy. Sent from my BlackBerry.
- Original Message -
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I think it moves datasets/volumes while they are open/being used.
http://www.fdr.com/products/fdrpas/
TDMF or whatever it is called these days does something like that too
https://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/offerfamily/gts/a1028233
Course neither of these are for Linux on z or z/VM.
If you are using LACP, must be ETHERNET. (Layer 2)
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rogério Soares
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 7:18 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] definition of guest using port group and vswitch
There is nothing special on the NIC to use a VSWITCH that has LACP.
Did you do the grant?
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rogério Soares
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:07 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM]
That doesn't sound right.
MDC getting in your way?
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martha McConaghy
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:16 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] CMS disk weirdness between
were not. I fixed the definition on the 2nd system and all is now OK.
Just trying to do too many things at once, trying to rush into production.
Martha
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:23:31 -0600 Marcy Cortes said:
That doesn't sound right.
MDC getting in your way?
Marcy
-Original Message
Phil, you might want to add some paging vols. We've noticed that things go
down hill fast when paging space is 50% (in our dev/test env with mostly WAS).
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Philip Tully
Sent:
1.8GHz was what my memory was telling me.
Googling reveals
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/lib03060.nsf/pages/lsprFAQz10EC?OpenDocumentpathID=
Says 1.7 about 2/3 the way down.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Add the couple command in there too.
Marcy. Sent from my BlackBerry.
- Original Message -
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Tue Dec 07 21:25:07 2010
Subject: [IBMVM] Vswitch Grant as a CMD in User's
What Kris said is right.
The 2nd time through you already have the access so it appears to work
After you IPL or destroy your vswitch, it wouldn’t work on the first login.
Drove me crazy.
Of course, I hate Grants ☺
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:32 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Vswitch Grant as a CMD in User's Directory?
On Tuesday, 12/07/2010 at 11:27 EST, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
Not George here, but that is correct. 5.4 will get you from there to here and
the ptfs will run on the z9 as well.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use,
Heck, I don’t know ☺
I delegated that fun.
Maybe my coworker Bob will respond.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] APARs and PTFs
Hello VM'ers.
We have new z196 boxes being installed that will have VM only and no z/OS.
z/OS folks have been doing our i/o gens for many years.
They tell me that they can write the new IOCDS from z/OS but will be unable to
dynamically activate it from z/OS. POR's would be required.
Is this
can use HCD to manage the IOCP but you will have to perform the dynamic
commands and activate the new IOCP
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:21 PM
To: IBMVM
Ok, we found this that describes what we can do.
http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/hcm/vmhcdmig.pdf
It looks like the CBDSACT utility will generate the dynamic activation stuff
for us.
Marcy
Right, that’s where we were before with them doing all the work and just
sensing the diffs. We were on a shared CEC. We’re ditching z/OS on our new
CEC s ☺
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this
z/OS person here found it.
Not sure how.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:59 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Dynamic IO Gens on boxes without z/OS?
Curious, how
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:59 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Dynamic IO Gens on boxes without z/OS?
On Thursday, 11/04/2010 at 03:02 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
But that's a disruptive
Well, you may want to just replicate that spool too. You can then just IPL and
go format some page volumes before you bring up any workload.
Saves you from recreating all the NSS's as well.
The headache is probably not worth the savings.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM
Thanks David and IBM ;)
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 6:35 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] FW: WAVV201003 update.
RMS fails to init if multiple
Tested what upgrade path? There's an upgrade path?!
Or maybe you are talking about running the 5.4 CMS under 6.1 CP or something
like that?
We're on George's page. There's nothing compelling in 6.1 for us. And we have
a lot of new function in 5.4 available by SPE which is way easier to do.
Well, if you had a new install on z10+ and not an upgrade, it would certainly
be the thing to do.
For those of use with 10+ systems, it's not worth a jump.
There wasn't even an ESP run for 6.1 since there was so little function that
didn't go into 5.4. Some customers did get the new function
I find it easiest just to do the service and put2prod on the production systems.
Others have ways of moving all the parts around... but it could be a big
inconvenience if you had to put an emergency PTF on quickly.
We run service ahead of time and right before the IPL, run the put2prod.
We
There is a SUPERSAY package on vm downloads page
(http://www.vm.ibm.com/download )
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use, copy, disclose, or take any action
You're going to have to put the RIPV2=YES
RECEIVE_RIP=YES
RECEIVE_DYNAMIC_NETS=YES
RECEIVE_DYNAMIC_SUBNETS=YES
RECEIVE_DYNAMIC_HOSTS=YES
On 2nd level def for the interface just like you did for the first I think.
Marcy
From: The
1 - 100 of 627 matches
Mail list logo
