t to be a way to fix the settings...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frankie
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 2:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [newbie] aol, html and related issues (A possible
> Solution.)
ed tharp wrote:
set a man next to a fire and he stays warm all night,
light a man on fire and he stays hot for the rest of his life
'cremation of sam mcgraw'. remember it well.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
=+=
think green...
save a tree, save a life, save time, save bandwidth, save s
Technoslick wrote:
[snip]
your are welcome for link.
i would have thougth by now that you would have been more up with
http://www.google.com/linux
do not recall count on search i feed in, but link was in first 10.
have a safe trip.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
=+=
think green...
save a
Technoslick; Nicely done! I agree with you completely! G seems to base his day to day
experiences on this list with a tad too much presumptive arrogance! Perhaps he's too
good for this list and should move on to the "Linux for arrogant elitist people" list?
Hope you got packed in time for your t
On Sunday 01 June 2003 10:02 pm, g graced me with:
> and, in addition to what i wrote before, i say this;
>
> give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> teach a man to fish and you feed him for a life time.
>
> show a newbie bad habits and you teach him wrong for a life time.
It's huma
Anne Wilson wrote:
> g appears to forget that I advocated teaching him to fish. He
> advocated shoving him into the river.
it would be a good way for 'him' to learn to swim. :)
but, no. i do not advocate shoving 'him' into a river.
nor do i note anywhere that i made reference to your prefer
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 06:39, JoeHill wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:08:34 +0100
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > g appears to forget that I advocated teaching him to fish. He
> > advocated shoving him into the river.
>
> holy mary mother of god is this thread going to go on fore
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:08:34 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> g appears to forget that I advocated teaching him to fish. He
> advocated shoving him into the river.
holy mary mother of god is this thread going to go on forever?
oh, right, sorry.
--
Joehill
Registered Linux us
On Monday 02 Jun 2003 5:00 am, eric huff wrote:
> > give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> > teach a man to fish and you feed him for a life time.
>
> I thought that was:
>
> give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> teach a man to fish and he'll drink beer all day.
g appears to
eric huff wrote:
I thought that was:
give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
teach a man to fish and he'll drink beer all day.
got to have something to drink to keep from being boarded when they are not biting.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
=+=
think green...
save a tree, save a life
Carroll Grigsby wrote:
how many newbies use html? too damn many.
-- Mostly because they don't realize that (1) there is an option, (2) using
HTML can be hazardous, (3) HTML is inefficient, (4) form != substance, and
(5) they're fishing with the wrong bait.
as i said, newbies do not care.
>
> give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> teach a man to fish and you feed him for a life time.
I thought that was:
give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
teach a man to fish and he'll drink beer all day.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.
Eric Scott wrote:
Just for the record, it is impossible to send plaintext with AOL 8.0, I've
tried it. Yes, it is also impossible to send with AOL on the web, no matter
what those sites say.
so you are saying that you have personally tried to use http://www.aol.com/aolmail
and it did not work?
On Sunday 01 June 2003 10:02 pm, g wrote:
>>> snipped
> how many newbies use html? too damn many.
-- Mostly because they don't realize that (1) there is an option, (2) using
HTML can be hazardous, (3) HTML is inefficient, (4) form != substance, and
(5) they're fishing with the wrong bait. On t
On Fri, 30 May 2003 12:53:31 +1000
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 01:10, Burrows, Scott wrote:
> > Stephen,
> >
> > Do you have a AOL IM id?
> >
> > I have some offline questions for you.
> >
> > Scott
>
> I've got:
>
> ICQ: 5483808
> AOL: kmaustralia
> AIM: y
On Sunday 25 May 2003 03:24 pm, eric huff wrote:
> Hmmm... I personally hate AOL, but there are many reasons one might use
> AOL:
>
> 1. The rest of the family does, and they're not in charge.
I think you meant the rest of the family uses it and they ARE in charge.
> 2. Travel alot and need to di
On Sun, 25 May 2003 12:24:06 -0700
eric huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pity poor aol users who;
> > can not send text/plain?
>
>
> Hmmm... I personally hate AOL, but there are many reasons one might use
> AOL:
>
> 1. The rest of the family does, and they're not in charge.
> 2. Travel al
Stephen Kuhn.
-Original Message-
From: Burrows, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] AOL ID
Stephen,
Do you have a AOL IM id?
I have some offline questions for you.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
AOL Systems wrote:
>Just want to askI have a LG CD-RW I want to used it in my Linux machine
>wat software will i need to burn my cd's and does it need a driver
>before I can used it?What else will I consider to run my CDRW on my
>Linux machine
>Thanks! any help will gladly appreciated.
>
>
>Respe
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:08:27 -0700
AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just want to askI have a LG CD-RW I want to used it in my Linux machine
> wat software will i need to burn my cd's and does it need a driver
> before I can used it?What else will I consider to run my CDRW on my
> Linux ma
AOL Systems wrote:
>ok i install Linux by CD i know that im just asking that I cannot mount the
>cdrom when im inside the Linux Systems already (KDE and Gnome)
>I dont want to reinstall again so what will I do so i will not re-Install
>again
>Thanks
>
>Respectfully
>AOL
>www.aolsystems.com
>
>Ju
Well the error you quoted says that iso9660 is not supported by the kernel.
Did you create a custom kernel? CD-ROM support must, I think, be explicitly
excluded from a default configuration.
Of course, I was about to say get a generic kernel from the distro CD ...
If you have the package manag
ok i install Linux by CD i know that im just asking that I cannot mount the
cdrom when im inside the Linux Systems already (KDE and Gnome)
I dont want to reinstall again so what will I do so i will not re-Install
again
Thanks
Respectfully
AOL
www.aolsystems.com
Julian Opificius wrote:
> How di
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 03:04, you wrote:
> How did you install Linux in the first place if not by CD ROM?
>
> julian.
> =
>
> At 02:10 PM 1/1/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >Pls help!
> >
> >I mounted my cdrom using mount /mnt/cdrom then
> >i went to the directory using
How did you install Linux in the first place if not by CD ROM?
julian.
=
At 02:10 PM 1/1/02 -0800, you wrote:
>Pls help!
>
>I mounted my cdrom using mount /mnt/cdrom then
>i went to the directory using cd /mnt/cdrom when i command ls
>no directories or files found
AOL Systems wrote:
>How to mount and unmount second hardisk on my linux box
>
>
>
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
Well it should be in your /etc/fstab for conve
Bah! Humbug!
At 07:08 PM 12/21/2001 -0800, AOL Systems wrote:
>TO ALL LINUX MANDRAKE MAILING LIST FRIENDS:
>
>I JUST WANT TO GREET YOU ALL
>MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
>HOPE OUR MAILING LIST WILL MUCH STRONGER AND HELPING
>SOLVE OUR EVERYDAY PROBLEMS.THANK YOU ALSO FOR ALL WHO ANSWER OU
On Saturday 22 December 2001 13:32, you wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:08:13 -0800
>
> AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> > TO ALL LINUX MANDRAKE MAILING LIST FRIENDS:
> >
> > I JUST WANT TO GREET YOU ALL
> > MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
> > HOPE O
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:08:13 -0800
AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> TO ALL LINUX MANDRAKE MAILING LIST FRIENDS:
>
> I JUST WANT TO GREET YOU ALL
> MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
> HOPE OUR MAILING LIST WILL MUCH STRONGER AND HELPING
> SOLVE OUR EV
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:38:27 +0800
AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DNS address of my ISP? but how? Pls help me on this.Ty again and in
advance!
> Respectfully
==
Your ISP should provide you with two dns#'s (call and ask). Then edit (as
root) /etc/resolv.conf
sea
AOL Systems wrote:
>
> I just want toask about my problem regarding Nestcape 4.7
> I connected to other ISP using dial-up connection and i browse using the
> available browser to surf the internet go to different website i
> encountered no problem.
> No after this i used my own ISP and manage to
have you tried to set it up using webmin? (https://127.0.0.1:1 > login
as root, > hardware > linux RAID?) you might have to install raid tools.
On Sunday 25 November 2001 10:49, you wrote:
> Pls help me to configure and how to setup RAID using two IDE hardisk
>
> Pls reply to me at least a
Dave Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 15:57, Randy Kramer wrote:
> > Dave Sherman wrote:
> > > My Aunt MAUREEN was a military advisor to IKE & TINA TURNER!!
> >
> > OK, so what's "the rest of the story"?
>
> I run fortune in a cron job, to generate my signature file. I really
> don't know w
Dave Sherman wrote:
>On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 15:57, Randy Kramer wrote:
>
>>Dave Sherman wrote:
>>
>>>My Aunt MAUREEN was a military advisor to IKE & TINA TURNER!!
>>>
>>OK, so what's "the rest of the story"?
>>
>
>I run fortune in a cron job, to generate my signature file. I really
>don't know w
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 15:57, Randy Kramer wrote:
> Dave Sherman wrote:
> > My Aunt MAUREEN was a military advisor to IKE & TINA TURNER!!
>
> OK, so what's "the rest of the story"?
I run fortune in a cron job, to generate my signature file. I really
don't know what some of these things mean I
Thanks!
Respectfully
AOL
www.aolsystems.com
"Anuerin G.Diaz" wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:48:17 +0800, AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Pls help me how to configure simple Samba configuration.Pls give at
>least a brief config using the source.Pls Thanks!
>
>Respectfully
>
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:48:17 +0800, AOL Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pls help me how to configure simple Samba configuration.Pls give at
least a brief config using the source.Pls Thanks!
Respectfully
AOL
try the default samba.conf and base from there. some of the options
Dave Sherman wrote:
> My Aunt MAUREEN was a military advisor to IKE & TINA TURNER!!
OK, so what's "the rest of the story"?
Randy Kramer
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 06:48, AOL Systems wrote:
> Pls help me how to configure simple Samba configuration.Pls give at
> least a brief config using the source.Pls Thanks!
Samba includes a simple smb.conf file that is self-documented. I based
three of my Samba setups on that file, with a few modifi
I would have stuck with postfix if I were you, its much more secure then
sendmail, its faster, smaller and
easier as well.
if you start postfix or sendmail on boot (run: ntsysv from a prompt) and you
recieve mail,
it will go into the user account for whole the mail was addressed.
if postfix or
At 01:44 PM 11/04/2001 +0800, you wrote:
>I've installed sendmail in my linux box .then i want to send e-mail.What
>is the command to receive and get mails in sendnmail program.
Sendmail automatically picks up on e-mails being sent to an account on your
machine (unless you have a dynamic IP, in w
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:30:01 +0100
Adrian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cleverly noted:
> I'm a bit late with this one! I had a chat with AOL's online help, I
> wrote a
> large paragraph of my situation, saying what info I needed , or thought
> I
> needed, to get AOL going in Win4Lin. His answer, "AO
aol no workie... period
Please be aware that aol changes windows registry settings,
updated/pollutes your network setting... denudes ie,
changes your modem dialing string.. and
then
when you update your windows, using windows update...
or when you install software that looks for the windows
I'm a bit late with this one! I had a chat with AOL's online help, I wrote a
large paragraph of my situation, saying what info I needed , or thought I
needed, to get AOL going in Win4Lin. His answer, "AOL does not support
Linux", 10 minutes of arguing later and it ends with a "thank you and good
b
My understanding is that version 4, 16bit will work with wine
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 04:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tryed aol 6.0 using wine last night, using wine. It just exited the
> setup for me, i'll try 5.0 tonight, i'll keep you posted!
>
> Equ1n0x
--
Jose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tryed aol 6.0 using wine last night, using wine. It just exited the setup for me,
i'll try 5.0 tonight, i'll keep you posted!
Equ1n0x
I did it using Win4Lin. I imagine you could do it for free using
Codeweavers Wine. I also suspect that you would get better results suing an
older AOL client.
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 05:05, Nitin Kapoor wrote:
> Can anyone get AOL to work in Linux. I doubt it though!!!
> On Tuesday 26 June 2001 09:11, Paul wrote:
> > > Can anyone get AOL to work in Linux. I doubt it though!!!
> >
> > AOL has its own proprietory protocol and stuff like that. I
> > have never heard someone hooking up linux with AOL before.
> > Paul
>
> Actually I have a binary of AOL for linux th
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can anyone get AOL to work in Linux. I doubt it though!!!
> >
>
> AOL has its own proprietory protocol and stuff like that. I have never
> heard someone hooking up linux with AOL before.
Perhaps the original poster shoul
> Can anyone get AOL to work in Linux. I doubt it though!!!
>
AOL has its own proprietory protocol and stuff like that. I have never
heard someone hooking up linux with AOL before.
Paul
They are working now, It just took awhile for them too take effect.
On Monday 19 March 2001 11:22, you wrote:
> I have 7.2 and installed AOL Instatn Messenger. According to the FAQ in
> need to make links to soem /usr/lib files which I did but the sounds still
> don't work. has anyone else had th
No.. it runs as an AIM client. Not an AOL clone. It will allow
you to log on with AIM, ICQ, and a few other chat programs. That's
all it does.
tdh
--
T. Holmes
Unixtechs.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.unixtechs.org/
"Real Men use Vi."
> doesn't "Everybody" run as an AOL clone? just wondering.
>
Jay wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Does any body know how to get aol running under mandrake linux 7.2 ,
> > or any help / advice on how to run wine
> > E-mail me on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thanks
> > :-)
> You can't run AOL under Linux, mention it again and we have to tar and
> fea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does any body know how to get aol running under mandrake linux 7.2 ,
> or any help / advice on how to run wine
> E-mail me on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks
> :-)
You can't run AOL under Linux, mention it again and we have to tar and
feather you. :)
--
Jay
~May the en
Take a look at this...
http://www.robnet.f2s.com/linux/aol.htm
On Wednesday 03 January 2001 23:31, you wrote:
> this was covered in depth a while back. unless things have changed
> recently, you can't do it. however ---
> there are many AIM like programs on your linux box already
> also, t
this was covered in depth a while back. unless things have changed recently, you
can't do it.
however ---
there are many AIM like programs on your linux box already
also, there are some attempts out there to make AOL work under linux, but i have not
been keeping up with them. do an internet
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> In a message dated 22-Sep-00 19:35:52 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << The connection may say 50,333 or something like that, but I dare you to
> compare
> the true speed to a real ISP >>
>
> ok here is something i bet you didnt know a
In a message dated 22-Sep-00 19:35:52 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< The connection may say 50,333 or something like that, but I dare you to
compare
the true speed to a real ISP >>
ok here is something i bet you didnt know aol will tell you you hooked up at
50k or 57.33k
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> Several years ago aol was worse than it is these days. They have updated
> their network and line availability [I regularly connect at 50,333, sometimes
> better but never lower than 49,666 and the program seldom needs to try a
> second phone number to connect
Several years ago aol was worse than it is these days. They have updated
their network and line availability [I regularly connect at 50,333, sometimes
better but never lower than 49,666 and the program seldom needs to try a
second phone number to connect] -- the "aol cuts you off" problem
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_aol000530.html
> http://www.canada.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1980986.html
> http://www.zdnet.de/news/artikel/2000/05/30020-wc.html
>
> unfortunately the sites that used to have the files have taken them down, I
> s
to comment when I questioned
them.
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Romanator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [[newbie] Aol and Linux]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
In a message dated 17-Sep-00 02:04:28 Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< >
> The client is definitely called Gamera, though last I heard it hadn't even
reached Alpha stage. You may be able to find it through one of these
addresses:- www.observers.net, www.inside-aol.com,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> In a message dated 16-Sep-00 08:52:10 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << The AOL Client for linux is called Gamera, it's not released in America
> yet,
> though it's been seen before around here because from what I understand an
> emplo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 16-Sep-00 08:52:10 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << The AOL Client for linux is called Gamera, it's not released in America
> yet,
> though it's been seen before around here because from what I understand an
> employee wh
In a message dated 16-Sep-00 08:52:10 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< The AOL Client for linux is called Gamera, it's not released in America
yet,
though it's been seen before around here because from what I understand an
employee who was testing it had posted it around th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I received an email a while back about them getting a port for AOL on Linux,
> then there was a whole bunch of hype over it, but now nothing. Im still
> looking out for this, if anyone knows any info on it and could tell me id
> really appriciate it.
>
> ~Lance
=
In a message dated 15-Sep-00 21:52:23 Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I received an email a while back about them getting a port for AOL on
Linux,
then there was a whole bunch of hype over it, but now nothing. Im still
looking out for this, if anyone knows any info on it
Steve Weltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there anyway that anyone knows to get AOL set up on a linux operating
> system(Mandrake 7.1)
>
> Thanks in advance
> ~Lance
Why is it you would like to put training wheels on a fighter-jet?
Honestly, I would look for an ISP
yes...I believe you are correct.
patrick darcy wrote:
>
> i believe this thread started when somone with no money or income
> had to use aol because their parents did.
>
> i could be wrong though, i think not, therefore i am
>
> Vic wrote:
>
> > Oh I think someone was just wanting to see what
i believe this thread started when somone with no money or income
had to use aol because their parents did.
i could be wrong though, i think not, therefore i am
Vic wrote:
> Oh I think someone was just wanting to see what would
> happen, except that curiosity did not kill this linuxcat.
>
Oh I think someone was just wanting to see what would
happen, except that curiosity did not kill this linuxcat.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> something surprises me about this thread. Since AOL sucks so bad why in
> the world would anyone runing an OS as rock solid want to run something as
>
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> that aol sucks... its only for internal accounts... so it doesn't work
The important issue here is that AOL is making a client for Linux.
AOLLinux is pre-alpha software, it was leaked, AOL did not intend for it
to be used outside of office.aol.com. But if you
don't look at it as something you're being denied...look at it as
something you're being liberated FROM!
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> no man its bad becuase I can'tuse it, when i sign on it says only for
> internal users
no man its bad becuase I can'tuse it, when i sign on it says only for
internal users
that aol sucks... its only for internal accounts... so it doesn't work
=*= wrote:
> This is something symptomatic. I clicked on this link, went
> to Slashdot and read the article. In the article there is
> an image link --
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I
> clicked on that because I'm a sucker for pictures. I tried
> that for about 15 minutes and gave up. It would
=*= wrote:
>
> This is something symptomatic. I clicked on this link, went
> to Slashdot and read the article. In the article there is
> an image link --
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I
> clicked on that because I'm a sucker for pictures. I tried
> that for about 15 minutes and gave up. It woul
This is something symptomatic. I clicked on this link, went
to Slashdot and read the article. In the article there is
an image link --
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I
clicked on that because I'm a sucker for pictures. I tried
that for about 15 minutes and gave up. It would start to
download (21
Wow, synchronicity...slashdot has an article on this subject today!
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/08/13/137233.shtml
Kathleen
AOL wont write software for linux, because anyone who uses linux wont want
an isp that wants to use a client program.
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] AOL for lin
Tom wrote:
Did you loose the Carriage Return key Adrian ? ,
you're 6 monitors wide!!
me: i am? very sorry. i'm on GroupWise5.5 at work, and IS locks us out of
everything. plus, this isn't what i use at home for email.
if anyone can tell me what settings to check so my mail is readable, em
*haha* good post to read first thing in the morning. =)
i agree with your perspective on the lack of fluff & learing curve that go with linux
(i'm looking forward to actually having to think again when using my computer).
but wait... isn't linux trying to take over the world? oh, that's M$
(I capitalized a couple of things to call your attention to them, I don't
mean to be yelling!)
As long as you don't mind lying--the FREEISPs I've used have a users
agreement where you have to agree that you are 18 to establish an account and
in some cases agree that no one under 18 will u
HEY!!!
Age shouldn't prevent you from getting this thing called a FREE internet
service provider account, they're all over the place--trick is to get
several so you're never cut off, and then tell your parents to follow the
directions I gave in another e-mail so they can cut their AOL bills in ha
Wow! now i'd buy THAT for a dollar! :)
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed |
** <_||_> in the making of this |
** =\/= message...| Registered Linux user #182496
-
OK... Although I can't quite understand why anyone switching to Linux would
still want AOL, here's the deal:
AOL software, of course, doesn't run under Linux...Will not run under Wine
under Linux (too big/complicated a program for Wine), and does not need it's
proprietary connection to talk to t
Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > AOL is the only ISP, (if you can call them that) that cares whether
you're
> > running Linux, BeOS, FreeBSD Windows...or whatever. Just my two
> > cents. suggesting that some ISP's are friendly to Linux and some aren't
i
I understand that there are a few ISPs that will
support connecting through linux. My experience is
that if you tell them you use linux they will stone
wall and get rid of you as fast as they can. This is
with @home, USWest and a dialup ISP called WebAmerica
network.
I've managed to connect to
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>A little more opinion: A few years ago, AoL got mostly clueless
> newbies as new signups. (hence the disdain by 'veteran' Net users).
> Within 6 months, most realized that AoL sux, and moved to other
> ISP's. Within the last year or so, AoL seems
>
> i respond:
> i was using AOL back when they were... darn, what were they called...
> bloody heck, i can't remember now -- anyhowz, before they were AOL, and the
Wayback when they were called q-link?
--
Alex
(Go easy on me, I'm a COBOL programmer in real life)
I understand what you're saying Adrian, but that's one of the very things
that makes Linux so atractive to "seasoned" linux, and computer users. the
total lack of frills and fluff that just "any" potential user would want
to pickup. Let's face it. If you REALLY want to use Linux there is a
learnin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am only 16 and dont have a steady income so therefor I need to keep AOL
> because it is what my parents have. I cant get a job around here because of
> age limitation and a bunch of stupid stuff so I am stuck.
>
> ~Lance
i wouldnt be surprised in the near future to s
yes...so true. But then again once you've grown to the point of using
Linux it's time to get a "reaL" ISP...know what I mean?
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed |
** <_||_> in the making of this |
**
Ok...now I understand what you meant. I've heard that a lot from time to
time and I've often wondered what folks meant when they said that. Then
again that's the beauty of this list! don't ya just LOVE linux people?
--
Mark
I would also suggest that you check into the free ISPs in your area
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Mills Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2000 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] AOL for Linux
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> >
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> AOL is the only ISP, (if you can call them that) that cares whether you're
> running Linux, BeOS, FreeBSD Windows...or whatever. Just my two
> cents. suggesting that some ISP's are friendly to Linux and some aren't is
> kinda strange since a lot of the ISP's are r
> AOL is the only ISP, (if you can call them that) that cares whether you're
> running Linux, BeOS, FreeBSD Windows...or whatever. Just my two
> cents. suggesting that some ISP's are friendly to Linux and some aren't is
> kinda strange since a lot of the ISP's are running either Linux or a Unix
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 09:25:43PM -0700, Christopher Mills Wolfe wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> >
> > AOL is the only ISP, (if you can call them that) that cares whether you're
??
> I'm not familiar with AOL so I don't know if you can logon and
> use another browser like Netsacpe or Internet Ex
Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> AOL is the only ISP, (if you can call them that) that cares whether you're
> running Linux, BeOS, FreeBSD Windows...or whatever. Just my two
> cents. suggesting that some ISP's are friendly to Linux and some aren't is
> kinda strange since a lot of the ISP's are running eit
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
