Re: [newbie] Installation (program) problems

2005-04-10 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Elwyn York wrote: Hiya Was planning to do the upgrade today but I loaned my car out and left the 10.2 CDs in there :( Doh! Anyway, Tried to install Crossover Office and it didnt like it... [EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]$ su Password: [EMAIL PROTECTED] elwyn]# '/home/elwyn/install-crossover3.sh' bash:

Re: [newbie] Installation (program) problems

2005-04-10 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:05:57 +0100 Elwyn York wrote: Don't undestand where I've gone wrong :( use # sh /home/elwyn/install-crossover3.sh Charles -- But officer, I was only trying to gain enough speed so I could coast to the nearest gas station. - Mandrake

Re: [newbie] Installation on sata disks

2005-04-03 Thread Paul
Isak Lyberth wrote: Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks? Regards Isak Yes. Well I have, had some trouble with the first release candidate of 10.0 (I think it was) - had to install sata_sil module at boot to install - but no problems since then.

Re: [newbie] Installation on sata disks

2005-04-03 Thread Isak Lyberth
how do i go about getting to install a sata module during the installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler, its a raid thing. Regards Isak Paul wrote: Isak Lyberth wrote: Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks? Regards Isak Yes.

Re: [newbie] Installation on sata disks

2005-04-03 Thread Paul
Isak Lyberth wrote: how do i go about getting to install a sata module during the installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler, its a raid thing. Regards Isak Paul wrote: Isak Lyberth wrote: Is it possible to install mandrake on a computer using sata disks? Regards Isak Yes. Well I have,

Re: [newbie] Installation on sata disks

2005-04-03 Thread Isak Lyberth
i used the 10.1 disk and was asked to prvide a driver Regards Isak Paul wrote: Isak Lyberth wrote: how do i go about getting to install a sata module during the installation? i have an intel 82801 SATA controler, its a raid thing. Regards Isak Paul wrote:

Re: [newbie] [Installation] Error on booting from cd - Unable to mount root fs

2005-02-15 Thread riccardo
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01:01 pm, James Nunnerley wrote: Can anyone assist with what the problem is likely to be? ___ ~ maybe a module. such as Reiser file system is not loading? best rgds Want to buy your Pack or

Re: [newbie] [Installation] Error on booting from cd - Unable to mount root fs

2005-02-15 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 07:52 am, riccardo wrote: On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01:01 pm, James Nunnerley wrote: Can anyone assist with what the problem is likely to be? ___ ~ maybe a module. such as Reiser file system is not loading? best rgds More likely

Re: [newbie] Installation problem - ?disc not being read

2005-02-09 Thread Rosemary McGillicuddy
Well - I have an install - did not get GUI up so obviously have a couple of things to sort out. LILO worked great - so thank you to those who helped. I'll reboot to Mdk and see what I can work out. Printer is perfect! Thanks Rosemary Kaj Haulrich wrote: On Monday 07 February 2005 23:25, you

Re: [newbie] Installation problem - ?disc not being read

2005-02-07 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Monday 07 February 2005 04:40, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote: Kaj Haulrich wrote: happens. I rebooted with disc in situ and get the window with the two options press F1' and enter to install Looked at F1 and then pressed enter. It appeared to start installing but then the monitor went

Re: [newbie] Installation problem - ?disc not being read

2005-02-07 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Monday 07 February 2005 23:25, you wrote: Sometimes it refuses to boot from CD1, in that case try CD2, it'll prompt you to change disks later on. BTW two things : 1. please don't post in html. Most people here filter html-messages out before they get read. 2. please remove your

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-31 Thread Elwyn
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: I see that my post got lost in the discussion, so here goes again... I got the 10.1 official download dvd. Everything burned OK. I boot the comp, I see the splash screen, I press F2, type expert, [enter]. The kernel loads And that's all

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB That's a SATA disk, I think? You might like to search the archives for booting from SATA disks Anne - -- Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/) Have

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Cyber Killer
Anne Wilson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB That's a SATA disk, I think? You might like to search the archives for booting from SATA disks no, it's not SATA, it's a standard ATA133 hdd -- Cyber

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:01, Cyber Killer wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB That's a SATA disk, I think? You might like

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Elwyn
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: Here is a list of my hardware: cpu: P4 1700 ram: 256 MB RAMBUS gfx: Radeon 7200 64 MB snd: SB Live! Player 1024 hdd: Seagate Barracuda 7200 120 GB dvd: LG GDR-8162B cdrw: LG GCE-8524B lan: Realtek RTL8139 + some stuff connected to USB, a

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:30, Elwyn wrote: On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: Here is a list of my hardware: Have you tried having unplugged your extra USB things incase there is a problem there?? That's a good point. Setting them

Re: [newbie] installation problem

2005-01-23 Thread Elwyn
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 16:35, Cyber Killer wrote: + some stuff connected to USB, a scanner, a printer,... http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=7320page=3 This chap has written a review on Mandrake 10 and has stated he's had problems with the Hotplug feature... Usb Devices?? Cheers, Elwyn

Re: [newbie] Installation problem: unable to resolve 'LABEL=/'

2004-10-17 Thread Randall D. Hobbs
On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:08 am, Boyi Zeng wrote: Hello, Yesterday I tried to install mandrake linux 10.1 to my notebook. The installation process is smooth. But I got problem at the startup after installation. The error message is like that: checking root partition: fsck.ext3:

Re: [newbie] Installation problem: unable to resolve 'LABEL=/'

2004-10-17 Thread Boyi Zeng
Hello, Thanks for your reply. I reinstalled mandrake, and choose LILO as the boot loader, and then it worked. Since I installed Linux from hard disk. there seems to be no method for me to edit the menu.lst or the fstab. Anyway, the problem is solved. Thank you. On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:40:32

Re: [newbie] installation - Advansys SCSI driver

2004-07-29 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:34, paul mccarthy wrote: I'm sure this question has been asked before in various forms for various drivers but I can't find the answer on the site. I have a scsi CD (HP CDwriter) running off an Advansys SCSI card (narrow). I had absolutely no problems with

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-26 Thread Todd Slater
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote: /var/www/html In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as follows ./configure --prefix=/apache/ your apache will be installed

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-26 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:57:05 -0400 Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote: /var/www/html In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-26 Thread Marc Hultquist
On Monday, 26 July 2004 15:57, Todd Slater wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote: /var/www/html In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as follows

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-26 Thread Tomas Tudja
for my english : Best Regards Tomas Tudja - Original Message - From: Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ??? On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:11:14AM +0200, Marc Hultquist wrote

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-26 Thread Marc Hultquist
OTOH, I've had more trouble with lesser problems. I just spent two hours with a network problem. The rj45 wasn't plugged in. Ya I done that as well in the past :-) -- Marc Hultquist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Computerkit Systems (Pty) Ltd http://www.cks.co.za (P) +27 11 695 5317 (F) +27 11

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-25 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:28:12 -0400 Sujit Apte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gentlemen, I have installed Apache 2 + PHP + mysql with Mandrake linux 10.00. In Apache installation there is a folder called htdocs where we put all data i.e. HTML files, PHP code and other stuff. However I did not

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-25 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:28:12 -0400 Sujit Apte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gentlemen, I have installed Apache 2 + PHP + mysql with Mandrake linux 10.00. In Apache installation there is a folder called htdocs where we put all data i.e. HTML files, PHP code and other stuff. However I did not

Re: [newbie] Installation folder for Apache 2 ???

2004-07-25 Thread Marc Hultquist
/var/www/html In-correct. By default apache2 installs its htdocs/ in the folder where everything else is installed, I.E if when installing apache you do as follows ./configure --prefix=/apache/ your apache will be installed in obviously /apache/ and your htdocs will be in /apache/htdocs/ !

Re: [newbie] Installation/configuration of PCMCIA Fax/Modem Card for ThinkPad X21

2004-07-08 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
nut megger wrote: Hardware: ThinkPad X21 with UltraBay; newly obtained PCMCIA fax/modem card to use to dial up my ISP. Question: Should the fax/modem card be inserted first and then a new Linux installation performed or should the card be inserted while Linux is running and it will be recognized

Re: [newbie] Installation Problem

2004-03-19 Thread Marcin Michalak
I had the same error with a 32b version. Do you install from CD? If so the cd you use might be bad. I tried to do network install and it worked (well, I had a different error and I still haven't installed the os, but that's different story). If installing from net is not good for you for

RE: [newbie] Installation Problem

2004-03-19 Thread Ayares, Mark (Mark)
ubject: Re: [newbie] Installation Problem I had the same error with a 32b version. Do you install from CD? If so the cd you use might be bad. I tried to do network install and it worked (well, I had a different error and I still haven't installed the os, but that's different story). If

Re: [newbie] Installation Problem

2004-03-19 Thread Steve Turner
Hardware is all new. - Original Message - From: Ayares, Mark (Mark) To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:32 AM Subject: RE: [newbie] Installation Problem Depending on how old the hardware is, I have had success with older machine

Re: [newbie] Installation Problem

2004-03-19 Thread et
On Friday 19 March 2004 10:12 am, Steve Turner wrote: I got the following error while trying to install the 64 bit version: FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1 I/O Error It says it can't recover and I should reboot? Any help would be great. I agree about hitting 'f1', if you get that far, but if

Re: [newbie] Installation Problem

2004-03-19 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 10:05, et wrote: On Friday 19 March 2004 10:12 am, Steve Turner wrote: I got the following error while trying to install the 64 bit version: FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1 I/O Error It says it can't recover and I should reboot? Any help would be great. I agree about

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-27 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Friday 26 December 2003 10:56 pm, Steven Nelson droned on: Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation path. Do you know where else the installation path could be? Try the command which mozilla on your machine. If its in your path, it will tell you where it is. If its

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-27 Thread Steven Nelson
Blomquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla. Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:27:40 -0800 On Friday 26 December 2003 10:56 pm, Steven Nelson droned on: Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation path. Do

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-27 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:56, Steven Nelson wrote: Hi, tried the command. It stated to enter a valid installation path. Do you know where else the installation path could be? Try slocate mozilla (you may have to install slocate). It's probably looking for the plugins directory. Anne --

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-27 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday 27 December 2003 1:09 am, Steven Nelson wrote: The installation said, try /usr/lib/mozilla, Mozilla was at /usr/bin/Mozilla. From, Steven Before you work yourself into a lather and start screaming

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-26 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday 26 December 2003 11:24 pm, Steven Nelson wrote: Trying to install Macromedia Flashplayer. During installation it asks for the installation path of Mozilla. Will somebody tell me the installation path of Mozilla in Mandrake 9.2?

Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla.

2003-12-26 Thread Steven Nelson
, Steven From: Charlie Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation path of Mozilla. Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:40:28 -0700 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday 26 December 2003 11:24 pm, Steven Nelson wrote: Trying

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:13, Greg Meyer wrote: On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:44 pm, Melissa Reese wrote: It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot up with the first installation CD and

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread John Richard Smith
Melissa Reese wrote: Okay...I did install Mandrake, but I may have missed something crucial with regards to the X server thingy. It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot up with the first

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi John, On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 11:38:43 PM PST, you wrote: Of course you can start all over again, and maybe you ought to, just for experience, but linux offers you many solutions, you can run XFdrake from that root terminal instead,

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread John Richard Smith
Melissa Reese wrote: Hi John, Vendor: Silicon Integrated Systems Bus: PCI Bus Identification: 1039:900:1043:80a7 Location on the Bus: 0:4:0 Description: SiS900 10/100 Ethernet Module: sis900 Media Class: NETWORK_ETHERNET Then, it also detects this: Vendor: USB Ethernet [pegasus] Bus: USB

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi John, On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 12:58:05 AM PST, you wrote: Cann't help the ethernet cards, no previous experience, nor cable modems. What sort of dialup modem do you have ? Well, here's a peculiar update. I was just over in

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-19 Thread John Richard Smith
Melissa Reese wrote: Hi John, What sort of dialup modem do you have ? Well, here's a peculiar update. I was just over in Mandrake, and I finally at least got the dial-up working! Good, I was able to receive your message in Kmail, but I couldn't send my reply from there. The error message

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 10:34 am, Melissa Reese wrote: Hi, I decided to give the installation a go by myself, figuring that if I messed it up, I could just abort and wait until my friend could be here to hold my hand. Here's the story so far (I'm pretty sleepy, so I hope I get this right)...

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anne, On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 3:22:05 AM PST, you wrote: Select 'Custom disk partitioning' There you should see your two disks. Choose the one you want for install, Thanks Anne. Here's a small update... This time around, I got

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:57 am, Melissa Reese wrote: This time around, I got to the next step of choosing the drive (and many other options for partitioning), and again I stopped...just to be safe. There were two tabs (hda and hdb), and the second tab did look like the 20 GB drive I

Re: [newbie] Installation questions

2003-11-18 Thread Anne Wilson
I've changed the subject line, as someone has pointed out to me that the word 'aborted' is causing the thread to be dropped by some mail filters. On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 11:57 am, Melissa Reese wrote: Hi Anne, On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 3:22:05 AM PST, you wrote: Select 'Custom

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Anne, Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 4:22:05 AM, you wrote: Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home (so that if you get any data on it you will be able to re-install or upgrade without losing your data). I assume

Fw: Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:36:11 -0700, Nick Andriash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me: Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home (so that if you get any data on it you will be able to re

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bryan, On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 4:07:03 AM PST, you wrote: I don't know what kind of computer you have but just a quick guess. Some of the proprietary computers like Compaq, etc. often create a small partition on the beginning of the

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Margot
Nick Andriash wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Anne, Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 4:22:05 AM, you wrote: Choose the one you want for install, and make a partition for /home (so that if you get any data on it you will be able to re-install or upgrade without losing your

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:07:05 -0800, Melissa Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me: The starter guide also suggests possibly changing a setting or two in the BIOS in order to make the installation smoother

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday 18 November 2003 1:07 pm, Melissa Reese wrote: Hi Bryan, snip This is a custom built computer, so I'll have to ask the guy who built it if he can explain what the MDK installation was seeing. As long as I can be very sure that I'm only

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread John Richard Smith
Melissa Reese wrote: As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no essential data on it yet, I can always just start over. However, there's another

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:07 pm, Melissa Reese wrote: Hi Bryan, As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no essential data on it yet, I can

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:51 pm, John Richard Smith wrote: Melissa Reese wrote: As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error myself, because if all I mess

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread John Richard Smith
Charlie M. wrote: Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:51 pm, John Richard Smith wrote: Melissa Reese wrote: As long as I can be very sure that I'm only messing with my 20 GB drive, I'll be happy to stumble through some more trial and error myself, because if all I mess up is the fresh drive with no

Re: [newbie] Installation aborted - by me

2003-11-18 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:44 pm, Melissa Reese wrote: It seems that I haven't properly configured my monitor and/or the X server thing. How can I go back and try this again? Can I just boot up with the first installation CD and start all over again? Yes, but we can probably fix it

Re: [newbie] Installation help with partitioning

2003-11-02 Thread John Richard Smith
Matt Dynice wrote: Hello, I am really new to Linux and I have a couple questions regarding the partitioning section of the install (I read the quick start manual and it didn't help.) First off I am running on Windows 2000 Pro on one hard drive and my second hard drive is what I want to run

Re: [newbie] Installation help with partitioning

2003-11-01 Thread Johan
Hi, OK we will asume some here... 1- Your win 2k you want to keep it the way it is. 2- The 2nd drive you want to use for MDK92 is empty or you want to wipe it. 3- You know how to connect/disconnect drives - change primary/slave links.. 4- You are new to linux 5- Prepared to spend some time

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis Myers wrote: On Friday 05 September 2003 01:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tony, I used that link. Many packages gave me the message: The signature of the package xxx is not correct No GPG signature package Do you want to install it anyway? Is there a

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/urpmiweb.php . Tony. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Installation problem. Hi, I went and installed the LM9.0 back. It worked fine unlike

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-05 Thread Dennis Myers
On Friday 05 September 2003 01:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tony, I used that link. Many packages gave me the message: The signature of the package xxx is not correct No GPG signature package Do you want to install it anyway? Is there a way to fix this?

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any hints anybody? I want LM9.1 to work on my machine, like win2k does and LM9.0 did. During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly (RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate monitors from the generic monitor list and many combinations of

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any hints anybody? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shame, the win2k is working and the LM9.1 on the same machine is not. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly (RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate

Re: [newbie] Installation problem.

2003-09-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shame, the win2k is working and the LM9.1 on the same machine is not. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, During installation of LM9.1, the graphics card was recognized correctly (RIVA TNT2 with 32Megs) but the Futura monitor was not. Many alternate monitors from the generic monitor list and many

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread Heather/Femme
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:42, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400 ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you are installing 9.1, there is no expert mode, like there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you can chose an expert mode. There

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread ed tharp
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote: I have to install my linux by passing the argument linux vga=normal *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i get a normal installation I want the installer to use Expert mode. Can i add another arg to that line

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread Heather/Femme
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote: I have to install my linux by passing the argument linux vga=normal *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i get a normal installation I want the installer to use

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread ed tharp
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:42, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400 ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you are installing 9.1, there is no expert mode, like there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you can chose an expert mode. There

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread Eric Huff
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote: if you are installing 9.1, there is no expert mode, like there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you can chose an expert mode. FFS... thx Ed. Btw whats the link to that mailing list archive you troll for

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments to installer routine

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 10 2003 02:42 am, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400 ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you are installing 9.1, there is no expert mode, like there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you can chose an expert mode.

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread Charles A Edwards
On 09 Aug 2003 19:56:16 -0400 ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you are installing 9.1, there is no expert mode, like there was in 7.0-9.0, but in some sections (like configuring the network) you can chose an expert mode. There is still an expert mode. It is not avaiable from the default

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-14 Thread Heather/Femme
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 23:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 07:18, Heather/Femme wrote: I have to install my linux by passing the argument linux vga=normal *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i get a normal installation I want the installer to

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-11 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 07:18, Heather/Femme wrote: I have to install my linux by passing the argument linux vga=normal *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i get a normal installation I want the installer to use Expert mode. Can i add another arg to that line

Re: [newbie] Installation query: Passing multiple arguments toinstaller routine

2003-08-09 Thread ed tharp
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 18:44, Heather/Femme wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 19:56, ed tharp wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 17:18, Heather/Femme wrote: I have to install my linux by passing the argument linux vga=normal *Ty Charles :)* to the Kernel to get video. While doing so is fine, i

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread Henri Bouchard
] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] installation Henri, You should be fine putting it on the same drive as your Win XP. This is what a lot of people do who dual-boot their machines. I'm curious, what errors or problems did you get when you put it on the second

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread eric huff
You should be fine putting it on the same drive as your Win XP. This is what a lot of people do who dual-boot their machines. Yeah, defrag it first, then you can resize it when you install. Make sure to back up your XP data first... Quoting Henri Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just bought

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:00:32 -0700 eric huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, defrag it first, then you can resize it when you install. Make sure to back up your XP data first... Diskdrake in 9.0 can not resize NTFS Using a 3rd party app such as PM v5 or other such partition program will be

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread JoeHill
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:19:55 -0400 Henri Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Hi if I put it on my drive that got Win XP will it work cause that drive is NTFS as for the second drive wich is 80 gigs I used 23 gigs for linux and when i finished installing it i could no go in the balance of the

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 21:22, Henri Bouchard wrote: I just bought mandrake Power Pack 9.0 I am on windows XP on the main drive and I have a second drive on fat 32. Can I install on main drive with win XP without loosing any XP or do I have to install on second drive that is partitioned

Re: [newbie] installation

2003-06-10 Thread eric huff
eric huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, defrag it first, then you can resize it when you install. Make sure to back up your XP data first... Diskdrake in 9.0 can not resize NTFS Using a 3rd party app such as PM v5 or other such partition program will be necessary. Try googling, there

Re: [newbie] Installation boot Kernel hang

2003-02-06 Thread walt
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 16:21, Simon Hosking wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install Mandrake 9.0 on a Toshiba Satellite 2430 laptop (P4 2.4, 256MB, NVidia 4GO 420). Using the install guidelines, I've tried to install booting from CD and boot floppy (using cdrom.img). In each case, the graphical

Re: [newbie] Installation boot Kernel hang

2003-02-06 Thread Brad Grissom
I had a similar issue on a machine. It turned out to be my CD's. I tried new, freshly burned CDs and it worked fine. ~~Brad On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:21 pm, you wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install Mandrake 9.0 on a Toshiba Satellite 2430 laptop (P4 2.4, 256MB, NVidia 4GO 420). Using

Re: [newbie] Installation boot Kernel hang

2003-02-06 Thread Simon Hosking
walt wrote: __ try an alternate kernel...when you boot to the CD, hit F2 instead of enter and type alt2 or which ever kernel you want to use..I have to use alt2 for my system Walt sorry, not very familiar with alternative

Re: [newbie] Installation boot Kernel hang

2003-02-06 Thread Simon Hosking
g'day walt, booting from alt2 works: the kernel loads. there are a couple of warning messages during install that i should be using a 2.4 kernel, rather than 2.2. Have you had any problems with this? walt wrote: On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 16:21, Simon Hosking wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-31 Thread David Robertson
On Friday 31 Jan 2003 12:09 am, Derek Jennings wrote: On Thursday 30 Jan 2003 11:55 pm, Sharrea wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 02:19, Keith Powell wrote: On Monday 27 January 2003 10:16 am, Derek Jennings wrote: Just for future reference if you download from the command line with

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-26 Thread Keith Powell
On Saturday 25 January 2003 11:09 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 01:05, Keith Powell wrote: I have just spent about two and a half hours downloading a package and all its dependencies, using MCC Install Software. When it tried to install the packages, it couldn't, saying

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-26 Thread Keith Powell
On Saturday 25 January 2003 7:49 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote: On Saturday 25 January 2003 04:24 pm, Keith Powell wrote: snip For information, the package was the Texstar Phoenix. I have heard some good reports about Phoenix and would like to try it. I am feeling very frustrated

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-25 Thread David Robertson
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 14:05, Keith Powell wrote: I have just spent about two and a half hours downloading a package and all its dependencies, using MCC Install Software. When it tried to install the packages, it couldn't, saying that there was an installation fault. It then abandoned the

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-25 Thread et
what program were you trying to install? On Saturday 25 January 2003 09:05 am, Keith Powell wrote: I have just spent about two and a half hours downloading a package and all its dependencies, using MCC Install Software. When it tried to install the packages, it couldn't, saying that there

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-25 Thread Keith Powell
et asked what package I was trying to install. Thanks for your reply. It is Phoenix from the Texstar site. On Saturday 25 Jan 2003 2:14 pm, David Robertson wrote: On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 14:05, Keith Powell wrote: I have just spent about two and a half hours downloading a package and all

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-25 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Saturday 25 January 2003 04:24 pm, Keith Powell wrote: snip For information, the package was the Texstar Phoenix. I have heard some good reports about Phoenix and would like to try it. I am feeling very frustrated at the failure of the installation! Many thanks I

Re: [newbie] Installation fault

2003-01-25 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 01:05, Keith Powell wrote: I have just spent about two and a half hours downloading a package and all its dependencies, using MCC Install Software. When it tried to install the packages, it couldn't, saying that there was an installation fault. It then abandoned the

Re: [newbie] Installation Help for v7.1

2002-12-25 Thread Michael Adams
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 07:05, Spencer wrote: On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:47:07 -0800 (PST) Andre Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gang: I'm trying to install Linux 7.1 on an old PC in my office, (128 M of RAM; don't remember how much hard drive space I have butI think it's at least 4G), but

Re: [newbie] Installation Help for v7.1

2002-12-24 Thread Spencer
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:47:07 -0800 (PST) Andre Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gang: I'm trying to install Linux 7.1 on an old PC in my office, (128 M of RAM; don't remember how much hard drive space I have butI think it's at least 4G), but it keeps hanging at the point where it's

  1   2   3   4   >