done with all your normal PFs, you can get rid of the system ones
too. I did this for a customer recently - to be quite honest it's a PITA with
limited savings.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott
Three cheers for REO...no, make that 4.
BUT, they stole the line from Groucho Marx...and technically, they didn't say
it, they just used it as an album title :)
From: Gasper, Rick [mailto:rickgas...@kings.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Vipre
Throw on a couple monitors and you're getting close to John's $2500 esitmate.
From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert.lebl...@aanmpc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Vipre console hangs server on reboot
I just bought an optiplex990 I7Quad, 16GB Ram,
A Toyota's a Toyota.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre console hangs server on reboot
I have a 5 yo Toyota.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Steve Ens
said it wasn't supported.
If Brian has a supported mechanism, I'm all ears. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:09 AM
To: NT System
I'm having some strange problem where robocopy /mir doesn't actually,
well...mirror. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with short file names.
The files that are causing problems are named:
Short name Long name
OLIVER~1.WPD OLIVER-M.GD2.wpd
OLIVER-M.GRD
OLIVER~3.WPD
: Thursday, July 28, 2011 6:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Weird robocopy /mir bug?
Turn off short filenames?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 15:51, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I’m having some strange problem where robocopy /mir doesn’t actually,
well…mirror. I’m pretty sure
If you just think of your normal work day, its easy to remember. I generally
work 7 to 9. 7-29 - easy peasy.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 10:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sys Admin Day
I need to somehow know when this day is coming up,
Uhh, nevermind. I just looked at how it was calculated :)
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sys Admin Day
If you just think of your normal work day, its easy to remember. I generally
work 7 to 9. 7
Turns out that this issue was a known issue that was fixed in W2K SP3 and NT
SP5. Unfortunately it seems to be back. Maybe I should spin up a W2K box to
do this copy :) Anybody have any better options?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/195144
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott
jamming me up.
-snip-
md CollisionTest
cd CollisionTest
echo a xx~1.xxx
echo a xx.xxx
md new
copy /y *.* new
dir new
-snip-
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday
not a desperation measure, it's a good tuning
measure.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 17:33, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
You mean short name generation on the server? That's on my list of
desperation ideas, mainly cuz I've never done it so I'm not sure
Win7/Win2k8.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 13:41, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Turns out that this issue was a known issue that was fixed in W2K SP3 and NT
SP5. Unfortunately it seems to be back. Maybe I should spin up a W2K box to
do this copy :) Anybody have
.10).aspx
Jeff
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
If you'd like to play along, the batch file below demonstrates the problem.
Note that we're creating two files, copying them to a new folder, but only one
ends up at the end
to them to see if it can get fixed for vNext. Fast! :-P
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 4:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Yup. Each recovery point is only storing the *blocks* that have changed since
the last recovery point. So, if you have a relatively static source, the
recovery points can be quite small.
Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint
On Aug 2, 2011 8:12
How big of a volume have you tried it on? Mine choked on about 2tb. I can't
really imagine how it would handle 20.
From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: find duplicate files
about it...as I was just
checking my home directory shares (approx 1tb)
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
How big of a volume have you tried it on? Mine choked on about 2tb. I can't
really imagine how it would handle 20.
From
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important criteria of all
on a FW? Or that's it's the bottom of your must haves?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN
This is basically our scenario, but you're still unprotected from a rogue admin
or virus connecting to both DPM servers and wiping out all your backup. A
removable device at least puts an air gap to protect you from any damage that
can be done over the network.
For that, I've been basically
/Andrew.S.Baker
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important criteria of all
on a FW? Or that's it's the bottom of your
It was actually edit.com, but it's not on my Win7 install, prolly cuz its
64-bit.
Why wouldn't you want to use notepad though?
I miss edlin :)
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Text Editor for Windows WAS:
Edlin...which is still available on at least W2K3
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Text Editor for Windows WAS: SQL for File Storage?
It was actually edit.com, but it's not on my Win7 install
RE: +MAX_INT
Nice :)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RTFM Advice
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:10 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
LOL. that's what I use this list is for. I
Except it should really not go into HKCR. If you want it machine wide, put it
into HKLM\Classes and if you want it just for you, but it into HKCU\Classes.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
The version of ifmember that I'm using is from 2003 from a resource kit.
Anyway, it still works fine on Win7-64. I don't believe it came as part of any
OS so I'm not sure what this blog post is referencing.
Note that Net User doesn't do recursive group searching like ifmember.exe does.
So,
circumstance does
IFMEMBER not work?
It's working just fine for me on Win7 x64
ASB
http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
The version
8, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
The version of ifmember that I'm using is from 2003 from a resource kit.
Anyway, it still works fine on Win7-64. I don't believe it came as part of any
OS so I'm not sure what this blog post
was wrong? On the internet?
OB xkcd: http://xkcd.com/386/
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I think the post was just misguided. He prolly had the resource kit installed
on XP and when he tried ifmember on win7, he got a file
machines...
Waitaminnit.
What version of Win7? i386 or x64?
We're rolling out x64 exclusively.
Kurt
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:39, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
The 12/2/99 version works for me also.
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b
if it makes a difference, tomorrow, when he brings a new user on line.
Kurt
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:57, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Both the 1999 and 2003 versions work on Win7 64.
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com
for Windows WAS: SQL for File Storage?
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Except it should really not go into HKCR. If you want it machine
wide, put it into HKLM\Classes and if you want it just for you, but it into
HKCU\Classes.
HKCR *is* HKLM\Classes
COLLEGE
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Text Editor for Windows WAS: SQL for File Storage?
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Except
Make sure to evaluate if group nesting could be an issue. I’m sure PS has a way
of handling it, but it's something to be aware of.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Drive mapping
I had a what the heck moment after reading the first line. It's so
ridiculous, you almost have to think you're misunderstanding something. I
guess the assumption is that the power fails more often than the battery so
it's a net gain for uptime.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
to
remember and probably stronger?
--Steve
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Interesting. I'd like to understand how the bits of entropy are calculated
though.
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.commailto:asbz
characters, when the latter would be easier
to remember and probably stronger?
--Steve
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu
wrote:
Interesting. I'd like to understand how
+1 for stupid.
It seems like it'd be harder to code in the limitations than to just let you
use as long of a password using any characters desired.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Almost, but not
easier, since the naturalness of
typing a sentence is more comfortable than trying to type rather random
sequences.
But, whatever works, I suppose.
Kurt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:52, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Thx. Now, I realize that the little gray
Thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Almost, but not quite OT: Passwords
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote
nice.
Reminds me of an old roommate, I clean the shower every six months whether it
needs it or not.
Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint
On Aug 11, 2011 7:42 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
I change my passwords religiously every
Yeah, it's really a question of whether the files are re-ACLed at deployment or
not. Even apart from the domain, you can add domain SIDs to ACLs with a
variety of tools.
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Maybe they thought it was called Smart Oops
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The U in UPS stands for...?
Sorry, but I can't call that a smart ups either. What are they thinking?
René
Op 10 aug.
Like a bell
-Original Message-
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Very OT quick favour to ask any Facebook users
They find them a-pealing.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
I'd be interested in seeing that if you can figure out which version that was.
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FYI: Free Windows Admin Tools
I remember an MSDos version that would say Format
have you compared the two lists to see which ones are missing to see if there's
some sort of pattern?
Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint
On Aug 12, 2011 5:50 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting thing I'm seeing
This
[mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FYI: Free Windows Admin Tools
This would have been circa 1992.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I'd be interested in seeing
sounds rootkit-ish. MS has a boot cd to run Security Essentials.
Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint
On Aug 16, 2011 7:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, but I don't have much faith in the AV software of choice (Trend).
What are these release notes you speak of?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blackberry BES Image Vulnerability
The first page of the release notes clearly answer this:
Can you directly copy the ttf to the Fonts folder?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Install fonts w/out admin on Vista; bypass UAC on a DLL?
Win Vista with current SP/updates.
1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Install fonts w/out admin on Vista; bypass UAC on a DLL?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Can you directly copy the ttf to the Fonts folder?
In my experience, Windows won't see them properly until
Hmmm 1999, so a bit old, but if it still works, then this bat is a little more
generic. You can just drag a font onto it and it will create the reg, copy the
file, import the reg and then delete the reg.
One problem is that it won't pull the actual name of the font, instead it will
use
Cheap and dirty, but might do the trick.
Usage is:
PingResponse IP AcceptableTime
For example, PingResponse google.com 10 would repeatedly ping google and if it
was ever over 10 milliseconds, blat will email you. Note that there's only 5
lines so watch wrapping. Also, this will not message you
dialog from Vista? It's
unchanged since Windows 3.1, maybe even older. Not saying the whole subsystem
is that old but it's weird one part went for so long with little attention.
--
Mike Gill
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17
Take Ownership is not the same as Give Ownership
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 10:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Taking ownership of a file at login
I thought Full Control encompassed RWXDPO (where P was Change Permissions and O
. -server mailserver.com -f m...@self.com -subject
Ping failed. -to m...@self.com
goto top
---PingResponse.bat---
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need a free ping monitor with email notification
Hello spoiler
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 11:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why not failwords?
Cause that worked out well in Demolition Man :)
- WJR
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:37, John Aldrich
System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why not failwords?
Wow, it's a nearly 20 year old film. Presumably if one hasn't seen it, one
isn't interested in it, at this point.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Hello spoiler
From: William
:) nice
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 2:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why not failwords?
That movie was spoiled long before me.
- WJR
On Friday, August 19, 2011, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo
As long as you're on a journey of discovery, start . is the reverse process.
:)
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 4:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Did you know...
You can paste folder names in a command-prompt windows by
However, there are ways to handle this
Such as?
My plan is to migrate from ESX3.5 to Hyper-V and I *planned* on joining the
hosts to the virualized domain.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Absolutely. I'd go further and say they just need to be isolated from running
non-approved code. A file server can have its shares full of viruses, but its
not a problem for the system if nobody executes the code ON the server.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent:
I loved it. Most satisfying movie I can remember. Not necessarily the best,
but it was everything I wanted it to be. Incorporating all the elements of the
show without being blatant ripoffs.
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:28 AM
To: NT System
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 8:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Microsoft support] Is it me...
However, there are ways to handle this
Such as?
My plan is to migrate from ESX3.5 to Hyper-V
://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 2:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Microsoft support] Is it me...
Thanks. That makes sense. So, really there's no issue as long as you have a
local
I'm curious why not. The more I think about it, the more it seems like a good
idea.
1. It completely negates the issue of virtualizing a DC or having a
separate physical DC
2. Second, a potential problem with running services on the host is that
it could starve the guests for
/AndrewBaker
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I'm curious why not. The more I think about it, the more it seems like a good
idea.
1. It completely negates
that the Hyper-V host should do basically nothing else
but host, and if they can be server core then even better. I run one full OS
Hyper-V host and all other hosts are server core.
Interesting discussion here though. I love this list.
Dave
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu
need IE, WMP etc patches, but who really
uses IE or WMP on their servers?
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Thursday, 25 August 2011 11:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Microsoft support] Is it me...
Isn't the attack
access to all hosts would be granted, not
just a vulnerable VM.
ASB
http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Isn't the attack surface
, depending on
your environment, consume significant amounts of memory and processor resources.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011
This kinda stuff infuriates me. Do they pay penalties on the over charges
sufficient to pay her salary as well?
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Just a reminder to double check your long
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]mailto:[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [Microsoft support] Is it me...
Are you saying that AD can over
Just passing through, but netsh might help.
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: IIS 6 SMTP virtual server relay restrictions
Anyone still out there?
I've got 4 boxes that I need to add about 40
Reseating the board and/or rubbing the contacts where it attaches to the drive
with a pencil eraser worked for one of our guys here last week.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: hard drive repair/data
On the other hand, if it's doing reverse dns on every ip that hits the
firewall, it could work. You're assuming they do that only once at rule
creation.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How to determine a host's IP range
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
From their description, what that does is look up the name to IP
address(es), and then uses that to drive the firewall rule. Which is
useful, don't get me wrong
I like anything other than Belkin for KVM. I was converted to Cybex, now
Avocent, by ASB ~10 years ago.
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for cable
Yeah...
Winning
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Triple Monitor Setup
Ok, here we go...
I spent almost $400 bucks for an ATI EGA Wonder video card that would display
EGA graphics on a CGA
2x CDROM made 7th Guest scream
From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Triple Monitor Setup
I spent over $800 on a 2x CD rom back in 1994 ish? I worked my butt off at
$4.50 an hour during the summer to
I've heard rumor of software that would let you cut a screen like that up into
virtual monitors so you could do things like maximize into a quarter of the
screen or some such. Anyone heard of such a thing?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 2:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: When DNS for your ISP goes down...
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
+53
I see what you did
: When DNS for your ISP goes down...
I'm going to -2 to keep us on topic.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday
a window management application named Divvy. It's very simple and works well.
http://mizage.com/divvy/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. Wouldn't surprise me though.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 16:10, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I've heard
Oops, nm. The big button that says Windows didn't show on my Palm Pre.
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Triple Monitor Setup
Anything like it for the PC
Well, when you get to the GPO that's making this setting, remove it and the
setting will go away without modifying the registry...that's (one of) the
beauty (^Hies) of GPOs.
The RSOP tool in GPMC will be able to show you which GPO is setting that.
From: Bernard, Norm
Back in the day, L0pht would be completely ineffectual against such a password,
even if you included said character in its character set. I emailed L0pht at
the time and they said they didn't support cracking alt-char passwords. I've
heard that this is not the case with other password
Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu
To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Fri Sep 09 13:59:00 2011
Subject
questions
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
There's a quite dated, yet relevant, article at sysopt about some of
my findings at http://www.sysopt.com/tutorials/article.php/3532756.
Scott: That entire analysis is based on the scenario where you have
Too bad rational human beings don't exist.
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DigiNotar compromise
I think this is relevant here:
Might wanna restrict that to whole numbers or even counting numbers. Rational
includes negatives :)
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 2:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DigiNotar compromise
+ some random rational number.
ASB
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 3:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: password questions
2011/9/9 Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu:
However, the point remains that incorporating an alt-char vastly
increases the brute-force space and therefore makes them harder to
crack
questions
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I don't think that's true. Point me to a rainbow table that has that large
of a
keyspace. I can't say I've looked exhaustively, but I've not been able to
find one that even exhausts the entire ascii space
I tend to agree with what I think you're saying. But, the original question was
whether adding an alt-char to your password would make you safer and/or your
password harder to crack. I think the answer to this is absolutely.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel
: password questions
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I don't think that's true. Point me to a rainbow table that has that
large of a keyspace. I can't say I've looked exhaustively, but I've
not been able to find one that even exhausts the entire
Standard users already have read access to that key.
Registry virtualization is automatically on in Windows 7 with UAC enabled.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: App compatability
Using LUA Biglight which
You should also keep in mind that in browsers with a combined address/search
bar, a single word such as helpdesk will get interpreted as a search term and
will take you to an internet search for that term. In ie9 and Chrome, you need
to type either http://helpdesk; or helpdesk/ to get it to
If its hitting the current user hive, you shouldn't need to run elevated.
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Default user runonce
We are in a bit of a pickle and
for example.
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Default user runonce
If its hitting the current user hive, you shouldn't need to run elevated.
-Original Message
Talking it out really helped.
Yup, many a time have I tried to explain to someone this ridiculous behavior
with no explanation only to figure it out mid-explanation.
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:09 PM
301 - 400 of 653 matches
Mail list logo
