Jonathan wrote:
I have been following the
ZX-5N in Africa discussion, and wanted the groups
opinions concerning which Pentax bodies are the most
durable. Which ones are the real die-hards? What are
your recommendations for use in extreme heat and dust?
Cold? What body (or bodies) would YOU
Most certainly the RH side. I was into cameras not girls.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: Equipment Freak -was two cameras on one neck
It looks like me in 1965 add about 15 in height and
Advice sought regarding an effective hood for the M35/2. I seen to recall a
recent post recommending the Pentax hood from a 50mm. And a long time ago
there was a post regarding Nikon hoods and this lens or similar. Any
suggections welcome.
Hi,
On 26 May 2002 at 19:13, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
a perfect metal (but not good for impacts and falls, as it's too
rigid and will transform all force onto the lens) hood for 35mm
lenses: Pentacon Praktica 50mm metal rectangular hood (49mm filter
ring).
I agree, that Pentacon
is this a good macro lens or not?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
how good optically is this lens?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hopefully, you'll receive this. Also sent a copy directly to your email
address.
Kathy L.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
this doesnt have anything to do with Jessops does it Peter?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How the H-E-double hockey sticks do you meter that ? My Sekonic L308-B
can only go
to 8000. Every other hand meter I've seen only goes so high so how do
you compensate
for ISO above 8000 ? (i.e. 12,500 and higher)
I shot a couple of rolls of Delta 3200 at 12,800
$100Aus?
EESSS!!
Buy it. But it now!
There have been numerous discussions on this list about the pancake.
Some think it's overrated, but I think that pretty much everyone would
say that for that price it's worth it!!
Personally, I think it's a wonderful lens. Sharp enough
Thanks all for the information.This roll had
some pictures of 2 first time riders but they were
near the beginning/middle of the 25 shot.Its going
in tonight so hopefully most will turn out.If there
is some fogging maybe a bit of cropping will suffice.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario
Robert.I NORMALLY test the rewind knob to check for film,
but it was a long day/night and when i did it the next
day,i was half a sleep and had only 1 coffee
in meG
No direct light,it was about 6:30 am and very overcast out
side.
Yep, i think i'll just do this once.
Dave
Begin Original
I concure,very nice poster and i'll be happy to
hang one in my room.I'm sure someone will be able
to act as a central depot in North America
Dave
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 26 May 2002 22:47:30 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anybody
Joe,
Here is a recommendation of a different sort. I don't know if you were at
the pavilion for a long or short time. I've found that patience is a big
virtue when using an A100/2.8 Marco.
Camp out by where the butterflies are. They run off as you approach, but
often this is just a 3 or
Mine would have to be my SP500.I have had it since
1971 and its been all over Canada,some US states
and the Middle East and Europe.It has fallen from a
helicopter and fell into the Pacific ocean.It has seen
+40 to - 40 Celcius.I have had to
CLA it once,and i think, now, the meter is acting up
a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] commented:
How the H-E-double hockey sticks do you meter that ? My
Sekonic L308-B can only go to 8000. Every other hand meter
I've seen only goes so high so how do you compensate for ISO
above 8000 ? (i.e. 12,500 and higher)
I shot a couple of rolls of Delta 3200 at
In a message dated 5/27/2002 6:45:39 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes (regarding 31-year-old SP500):
It has fallen from a
helicopter and fell into the Pacific ocean.
Sounds like an interesing story -- how did you retrieve it?
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls
Like most people on the list I would LOVE one of the posters!
Alex Grigolia
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Most definetely a cool poster...
Rogier
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Anybody interested in getting the Pentax poster?
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 07:42:45 -0400
I concure,very nice poster and i'll be happy to
hang one in my
Luckely it was just as we took off from the
Tug boat we were living on doing a survey
of the Queen Charlotte Islands off the BC coast.It
fell into a foot of water,he landed and i used a small
hook the pilot had in the front to grab onto the
neck strap.I let it dry in the sun all day at my
Lot of stuff i bought at an auction and dont need.
3 flash grips $5 a peice
10 misc flash bottom brackets. $2 a peice or 10 for all
2 zeiss bulb flashes $7 each
cable release F new $25
Exacta Nice shape $15
2 bulb flash extetions $5 each
Tripod head tilt, swivel $20
graflex 2x3 film pack adapt.
Fred wrote:
I just had this thought cross my mind, though: Wouldn't it be sad
if 2002 passed without anything really special to celebrate about
from Pentax itself? Hmmm...
Yes, it would be sad and quite frankly a bit strange as Pentax usually
commemorate such events. They even celebrated
By friday last I had received both the battery pack that I had bartered
for with Andre and the Ni-Cd batteries that I had ordered from DigiKey.
Armed with Rob Studdert's instructions I tore into the battery pack and
found things pretty much as described except:
Problem: Batteries inside were
On Mon, 27 May 2002 08:11:09 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like most people on the list I would LOVE one of the posters!
Same goes for me!!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
I just had this thought cross my mind, though: Wouldn't it be sad
if 2002 passed without anything really special to celebrate about
from Pentax itself? Hmmm...
Yes, it would be sad and quite frankly a bit strange as Pentax
usually commemorate such events. [snip] Lets hope they will make
a
A little calculation using f/calc:
1 - Full frame 5 subject equals to a rough 1:5 ratio.
2 - Using your 50mm lens you'll get 1:5 at 30 cm., i.e. you need an
extension tube.
3 - At f/1.4 and 30 cm. (1 ft) your 50mm will yiekd less than 3mm depth
of field
(with a .033 COC).
Hope this helps,
William wrote:
I don't see weight as being an isuue, a 6x7 and a few lenses is
easily carried, and a Manfrotto 055 tripod will support the 6x7.
The Manfrotto 055 is borderline for even the 645N. I would certainly
recommend something stronger for the 67.
There are conflicting opinions about
Fred wrote:
. . . and not just a special edition LX (i.e., another
different-color, re-badged LX - as much as I love the LX, it does
Pentax NO good to produce another collector's version of the LX),
but a true, state-of-the-art, rugged, pro or semi-pro body that
would be the modern equivalent of
On Sunday, May 26, 2002, at 01:04 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I wasn't suggesting using a minilab for printing real BW. If you can't
print the negs yourself, then find a real lab that can do the printing
for you. I'd never suggest a minilab for making a decent BW print.
I know, Shel, I was
On Sunday, May 26, 2002, at 05:39 PM, Bob Walkden wrote:
we could all turn up and meet you through the glass separating airside
from solid earth. Could be like a cross between 'The Graduate' and
'Midnight
Express'...
I would feel like I was at the zoo...
-Aaron
-
This message is from the
Pål wrote:
The Manfrotto 055 is borderline for even the 645N. I would certainly
recommend something stronger for the 67.
I use an 055 (and 029 head) with the 67 with no problems whatsoever. I've
had great success even with the 300mm lens. I wouldn't recommend extending
the lowest leg
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 02:39 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
I really need to get some hands-on with both camaras, just
need to find a shop that has them available ...
Totally the way to go. I held a 67 in my hands and I just fell for it.
645n was pretty good, too, but just didn't call to me
I wrote:
They even celebrated the 20th anniversary of the
LX with a black titanium version.
Correction. I believe it was the 15th anniversary.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
David, on 6x7 stability issues, wrote:
I don't know about MLU being mandatory but I do use it 99% of the time
because I don't want to take the risk. All my handheld shots have turned
out well so far, but I have tended to use pretty high shutter speeds. The
camera is a lot less stable
Len Zedel wrote:
Problem: Batteries inside were not 1/3 AA but rather 1/3 A! (Careful
reading would have revealed this fact). This subtle
distinction was lost
on me after the thread of ni-cd versus ni-mh of a couple of weeks ago
through which I was sure reference was made to 1/3AA. We
Hi,
I bought a defective Drive A at Ebay. I found the problem: the connection
between the battery contacts and the wires inside is done by a metal part
which is clamped inside the housing onto the inner side of the battery
contacts. The wires are soldered to the clamping metal part. At my drive
Hi,
Aaron wrote:
I would feel like I was at the zoo...
I was going to say On which side of the glass would the animals
be? But I realised that it would be the side opposite to that
with most cameras. 8-)
mike
who has been likened to a gorilla on more than one
occasion..
-
This message is
On Sunday, May 26, 2002, at 07:06 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Is it really true that the 67 with standard lens (say 2.4 105mm) must
be used
on a tripod all the time to get sharp images ?
Nope.
http://homepage.mac.com/aaronreynolds/PhotoAlbum4.html
The left is the full image, the right is a
In a message dated 27/05/02 15:28:36 GMT Daylight Time, Rob writes:
this doesnt have anything to do with Jessops does it Peter?
My dear boy, I don't know what you mean..
I am simply researching a planted rumour.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
I repaired a motordrive with this exact problem!
Len.
On Mon, 27 May 2002, HUDERER Bernd wrote:
Hi,
I bought a defective Drive A at Ebay. I found the problem: the connection
between the battery contacts and the wires inside is done by a metal part
which is clamped inside the housing
I went to the hardware store and bought some DIY window screens.
They're about 4'x4'.
RC gets dried facing up, fiber face down.
tv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Jones
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If yer talking C-41, push processing doesn't do anything usefull
anyway.
I was talking to my lab guy the other day about this too. He thinks
the average c-41 emulsion can get a 1/2 stop. After that you just
start getting color crossover and
BigDay Tom wrote:
On a side note, the allure of chromogenic has caught me
...I shot my first roll at a wedding yesterday
The discontinued (but still in the pipeline) TMaxCN is
(IMHO) a marvelous people film. The tonality is very
smooth and grain effect
Does anyone know how much is gained using a monopod in terms of
reduction of necessary shutter speed? For example, using a 300 mm. lens,
the 1/focal length rule would call for 1/350 sec. How much can that be
reduced with a monopod?
Thanks,
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry
Subject: Re: bone-simple darkrooms
Wheatfield wrote:
Something to think about:
If you shoot large format, especially 8x10 or larger, all
you
need is a lightbulb hanging from a wire, and a few trays.
True, a thermometer and a Timex
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Needed: The Perfect Lens
So here's what I need:
A zoom range of about 80-200 mm.
Macro (magnification) capability of at least 1:3.
Constant f2.8 aperture.
Think about a set of extension tubes to get macro capability out
of the
Hi,
On 27 May 2002 at 9:23, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Does anyone know how much is gained using a monopod in terms of
reduction of necessary shutter speed? For example, using a 300 mm. lens,
the 1/focal length rule would call for 1/350 sec. How much can that be
reduced with a monopod?
With my
I've had an ME Super, an SP 1000 and an LX fail on me at inopportune
times (the ME Super's advance mechanism died the day before an important
shoot, the SP 1000's advance mechanism died of old age during an
interesting photographic exhibition, and the LX has been bad twice: once
it froze up
Perhaps this has been asked and answered before, and if it has, I wasn't
paying attention. There may be some need or preference for me to shoot
some chromogenic BW in a few months and I was wondering if any version
of the stuff has better archival properties than another, and if the
various
To bad there are no crickets around here I could us
such a timing system.
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: bone-simple darkrooms
I thought Casselberry would still be counting
cricket chirps
g.
Now, there is a
Hmmm ... do I see a marketing opportunity?
Brendan wrote:
To bad there are no crickets around here I could us
such a timing system.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 11:07 AM, tom wrote:
Unfortunately my lab has slightly elderly machines and they don't even
have the option of pushing...supposedly they're getting a frontier
this year.
Frontier won't let 'em push. As far as I know, no automated mini-lab
style machines can
Hi David.I was just at Accent in Markham dropping
off the weekend film and they have 2-3 bricks
in the fridge.I'm going to pick up some from them
when i pick up my colour proofs Friday.
Thanks for the offer
Dave
Maybe I've been too harsh on T400CN -
FWIW, Dave Brooks, I know that Downtown
Hi Jerry.The Rapid Photo 1 Hour were i live does 4x6 and
5x7 BW but has to send the 8x10 out to the bigger store south
of me.near Brendan.My guy does his BW as his end of day work.
Only problem,he only has glossy and i like my BW matte.If
only that were my only life problem ehG
Dave
Begin
Define cheap. Do you want something just for processing film, or to use
with your enlarger?
Brendan wrote:
anyone have a decent cheap timer for sale yes,
cricekts no lol.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 12:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know of any minilab in my area (Houston, Tx) that does real
b/w in
any fashion?
They generally don't, unless they're really upscale (and by then they're
not really a minilab anymore). Minilabs can, however, make a
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 01:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm waiting for the next story that has you somehow photographing at a
local nuclear power station; and you hand the gear to your assistant
and the flash accidently sparks off setting off a chain reaction which
causes a
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 10:42 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm ... do I see a marketing opportunity?
After that stuff you rub onto your lens to get more light I don't think
anyone will buy anything from you, Shel. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Did you realize there's a little nubbin on the neckstrap buckle that's used to press
the rewind button and set the date back? You don't need to use a pen, unless you've
removed the strap.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Ever thought of switching assistants VBGor one
with longer reach,againVBG
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 27 May 2002 13:31:20 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Mounting Carnage
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't had any trouble getting more stock of T400CN. If the channel
starts drying up, I'll sound the alarm, but for now I wouldn't panic
about it.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Hey, that Photon Grease is selling real well down here. It's got a new,
improved formula which makes the photons even more slippery and which
also works well to get the grime off your whitewall tires. $6.95 for a
1-lb jar, which will last a very long time.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Monday,
The 1/3 AA's are a little smaller than the 1/3A's but they are rated
at 110 mAh consistent with the original batteries and ni-cd batteries
don't mind delivering a lot of current. We'll see how they do in the long
run but for now things seem to work fine.
Len.
On Mon, 27 May 2002 [EMAIL
K1000 - A couple of months ago I sold a K1000 that I
bought new in 1978, never gave me a problem, never had
it serviced and still worked fine when sold. A MX I
bought new in 1980 had the flash sync contacts go twice
and the meter finally died. Program Pluses get a little
flakey in the
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Yeah, I was thinking that, too. Well, at least Tom's assistant wasn't
the one who stabbed him. I think they're running out of assistants in
Tom's neck of the woods. :D
So if the last assistant got fired for tipping the tripod, does that mean
Tom
I glance up to see all the bridesmaids staring at me as I lick my
28-70/2.8.
Tom, I would pay good money to see this.
8-D
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh
Not the MZ-S,see Tom's postg
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/index.html
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
anyone have a decent cheap timer for sale yes,
cricekts no lol.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm ... do I see a marketing opportunity?
Brendan wrote:
To bad there are no crickets around here I could
us
such a timing system.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL
Shel wrote:
I thought Casselberry would still be counting cricket chirps g.
Nah - I'm high-Tech now. I found an old GraLab timer at
Salvation Army for $5 and it has made things much nicer.
!8^) Bill
Depending on the camera, any TTL flash would make life easier. The key is to
get it off camera and in front of the lens to avoid lens shadows. A ring
would be ok if you like flat lighting (unless of course you get an af140c
with it's dual tubes fired singly).
christian
On Monday 27 May
for the enlarger, less than $120 can ( equv ) at least
1/2 sec accurate .
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define cheap. Do you want something just for
processing film, or to use
with your enlarger?
Brendan wrote:
anyone have a decent cheap timer for sale yes,
cricekts
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 02:43 PM, Cotty wrote:
Tom, I would pay good money to see this.
Yeah, did any flashbulbs go off in the congregation as you licked your
lens? Were there videocameras, and should we expect to see you on the
Fox special When Good Photographers Go Bad?
-Aaron
-
I dry mine the old fashioned way.
I squeegee them completely then hang them from one corner using a c-47
(clothes pin). I always make sure (especially if a print is borderless) that
no water puddles at the bottom corner.
RC papers thoroughly squeegeed shouldn't take longer than about a half
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, that Photon Grease is selling real well down here. It's got a new,
improved formula which makes the photons even more slippery and which
also works well to get the grime off your whitewall tires. $6.95 for a
1-lb jar, which
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pat White
Did you realize there's a little nubbin on the neckstrap
buckle that's used to press the rewind button and set the
date back?
Yeah.
You don't need to use a pen, unless you've
removed the strap.
I don't use
HAR!!
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Shel
Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, that Photon Grease is selling real well down
here. It's got a new,
improved formula which makes the photons even more
slippery and which
also works well to get the
-Original Message-
From: Pat White
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:01 PM
Did you realize there's a little nubbin on the neckstrap buckle that's used
to press the rewind button and set the date back? You don't need to use a
pen, unless you've removed the strap.
Pat White
-
Pat,
Unless you
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My question is if you dunk yourself in Photon Grease, does that make you
easier or harder to see? If the latter, I imagine the RCMP would love
to buy a couple of truckloads of that stuff.
-Aaron
-
It would make Shel look
AF500FTZ with 3 ft 5p cable and fg adaptor, placed 45
deg to the subject works wonders with the sigma 70-300
apo lens.
--- Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Depending on the camera, any TTL flash would make
life easier. The key is to
get it off camera and in front of the lens to
Thanks for the info Pl,
Very useful links!
I lean towards the 645N at the moment, going to check both out
at a shop in a few days ...
When getting a 645N now, I could always get a 67II in a few years :-)
Regards, JvW
On Mon, 27 May 2002 15:20:44 +0200, Pl Audun Jensen wrote:
The
Joe Wrote:
So here's what I need:
A zoom range of about 80-200 mm.
Macro (magnification) capability of at least 1:3.
Constant f2.8 aperture.
This is a pretty tall order, as most of the faster
telephoto zooms don't have great close-focus
specifications. If you ~REALLY~ need a fast (i.e.
tv scribbled...
Yesterday I ran out of film during the processional and had to reload
film right as the bride and father were walking down the aisle. I
loaded too fast, and the MZ-S jammed. I quickly handed the unit off to
my assistant, grabbed the other body and shot away.
Apparently I
When I had to write down the list for the cameras to consider for the
poster, at last I decide to only stick mass-produced models it is likely you
could buy in photo stores at their respective era, keeping off special
versions (such as Motor Drive versions, celebrative models) and rarities
(demo
Would you enter that picture as 'Still Life' or
'Elements'another vbg
You knew this was coming eh Tom:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is good, because most of my assistants are crying as soon as they
see the bride come down the aisle and wouldn't notice
Perhaps a MZ-S SE?
regards,
Alan Chan
Yes, it would be sad and quite frankly a bit strange as Pentax usually
commemorate such events. They even celebrated the 20th anniversary of the
LX with a black titanium version. The 60th Asahi anniversary with the
original LX. Their 75th anniversary with
Frank, where's the cut off point between Geek and pro?
I'm planning on the SP, GS645 and 'Mat for the next meet. Is that geeky or
pro?
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Equipment Freak
If I'm trying to be nice to someone (as I was to Amita), I'll tell them they
look like a pro.
If it's someone I know (like you), they're geeks.
Sorry. ;-)
-frank
Jeff wrote:
Frank, where's the cut off point between Geek and pro?
I'm planning on the SP, GS645 and 'Mat for the next meet. Is
Hi Chris,
What, of an old abandonned liquor warehouse? Nothing but a bunch of old
wooden racks and a barrel or two (to look good, I guess). It was part of the
tour; everyone got to go there.
Anyway, the whole idea of Doors Open is to let folks in to these otherwise
inaccessable places and
Hi, Dave,
APO, at 41 Britain Street (Richmond and Sherbourne area). 416-368-3840, if
you want to call first.
$6.50 to develop 35mm or 120. $8 for a contact sheet (with processing). 65
cents each for 4x6 proofs (with processing).
regards,
frank
David Chang-Sang wrote:
Frank,
What lab is
Nope... just some Python humour that appears to have missed the mark. :)
chris
On Mon, 27 May 2002, frank theriault wrote:
What, of an old abandonned liquor warehouse? Nothing but a bunch of old
wooden racks and a barrel or two (to look good, I guess). It was part of the
tour;
Hi, Jeff,
All kidding aside, I'm looking forward to seeing them too!
-frank
Jeff wrote:
Don't be sorry.
Actually I'm dying to get my hands on the MF cameras. It should be fun.
Jeff
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
That's a valid question:
Where's the top end limit ?
I mean, in my eyes, showing up at a meet with a few 35mm may classify you as
one of the following:
1) pro
2) collector
3) semi-geek
While showing up at a meet with .. ummm... say... a Cambo 8x10 View Camera
would, in my eyes, classify you as
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Len Paris wrote:
Nope, it's not necessary to use that short of an exposure,
generally speaking. That's why enlarger lenses have adjustable
apertures.
Thanks! now I am off to create the frankentimer!
- Chris
--
Chris Murray /\
[EMAIL
Frank,
What lab is this ?
It's always good to have or know about another lab around just in case one
starts to suck :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of frank theriault
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank,
You can't screw up a nice shot. If you've got the negative, then you
can always make another print, or, if you feel particularly insecure,
the neg can always be taken to a good printer for a final, exhibition
quality print.
And, by processing your own BW, you can have absolute control
Just when you thought I'd forgotten - my review of the PUG for May is
here. I remember having a quick look days and days ago, and thinking then
that this PUG was a corker (as we say here in England) and that I'd need
to devote lots of time in having a good squint (as we also say) and
giving
- Original Message -
From: Chris Murray
Subject: building a darkroom timer
What resolution does my timer have to be in? Is seconds good
enough? or
will I encounter occasions where I will need 1/2 of a second
or shorter?
If you need finer time resolution, close the lens down a couple
Side door to the other side leads up, and up and up. I
view from there is great :-)
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Brendan,
Nope, t'weren't me. I was at Gooderham's at around
3:30 or so. Only had
one body (MX) but did have the Sigma 50-200 in it's
case over one
1) Pros don't shoot Pentax or Yashica (I'm going to get creamed here).
2) Collectors don't shoot.
3) Semi-geeks talk about it. Geeks do it.
Hi Dave, how's gLoinXg.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 7:13
Don't be sorry.
Actually I'm dying to get my hands on the MF cameras. It should be fun.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Equipment Freak -was two cameras on one neck
If I'm trying
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
