Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Shel
The reflections in the mirrors are a bit too much for my taste and lead away
from the people sitting there.
Otherwise a funny snapshot.
greetings
Markus
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/images/tel_ave.html
Shel
YEah, a bit too much
- Original Message -
From: Steve Morphet
Subject: RE: 6x7 'X' setting
William Robb wrote:
probably starting with a 200mm lens.
Get the newer SMC Pentax one. It is a lot better than the
Takumar.
I'll look out for one. I've read that the SMC Pentax lens has the
advantage of
Despite not being a fan of teleconverters I always seem to be in posession
of at least one. Early on I had a Vivitar 2x tele, the less said about this
the better, bud it was adequate for the use I gave it.
I later bought a Teleplus MC7 2X this was much better and gave very good
results (for a
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
hi everyone,
well, i am not sure if any of you have noticed, but i have been really quiet
on-list since returning from the US. there is alot of heavy stuff going
down in my personal life at the moment, and i am now going to have to
unsubscribe from the
William Robb wrote:
One thing to note, the shutter speed dial is quite easy to knock off
it's setting if you have the speed adaptor ring mounted (I think it
only came with the meter prism though).
Check you shutter speeds frequently if you are
Based on some bad past experiences with cameras, kinda makes
you wonder why all cameras with rotating shutter speed dials
didn't have a lock on them, at least a lock for the X position
at a minimum.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Sorry to hear that.
Hope you return soon!
DagT
På 5. jul. 2004 kl. 01.53 skrev Tanya Mayer Photography:
hi everyone,
well, i am not sure if any of you have noticed, but i have been really
quiet
on-list since returning from the US. there is alot of heavy stuff
going
down in my personal life at
All the best, and hope to see you back asap.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 1:53 AM
Subject: tan unsubscribing...
hi everyone,
well, i am not sure if any of you have
Great thanks for the info guys and I would love that
scan.
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite not being a fan of teleconverters I always
seem to be in posession
of at least one. Early on I had a Vivitar 2x tele,
the less said about this
the better, bud it was adequate
On 5 Jul 2004 at 12:22, Arnold Stark wrote:
Hi,
I confirm that wide open the FA43 is as sharp as the other Pentax
normal lenses. Stopped down to f5.6-11 it is on the same level, too.
However, at f2.8 an f4 it seems to be sharper.
However, the magic of this lens is not only about
These are from a hike on Noble Knob near Mt Ranier that I took on
Saturday July 3rd, 2004. Shot with the *ist D and DA 16-45/4
(I also carried my FA 35/2 and M 135/3.5 that day, but never used
those).
I like the texture in this one a lot:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 21:31, Derby Chang wrote:
Retro film question here.
Does anyone know of a site that has a list of film type codes - the
markings on the edge of negs and trannies.?
I think this is about the closest you'll get:
http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/html/vuesc15.htm#topic14
On 4 Jul 2004 at 21:25, Verge Scott wrote:
Actually from the testing I have read good 1.4
teleconverters can actually be very good and almost
indistinguishable at times. If used with a high
quality prime lens also.
Quite correct, 30 years ago this wasn't the case, now a lot of the
RS My current lens kit has been formed by a process of distillation and the 43mm
RS LTD wasn't magic enough to entice me to keep it even in glorious jet black.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
D'oh...
Sorry, Derby.
Of course you didn't mean the DX coding.
This link may help you out:
http://www.srv.net/~vail/filmdata.htm
cheers,
Jostein
Quoting Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Derby.
Try this: http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/2131/dx-code.html
It came up as the top rated hit
Sorry to hear about your troubles. Rmemeber that the PDML will still be
here if you want to argue to death about stuff that doesn't matter . . .
;-)
Wow, nice stuff. I like the leaves picture too. I like the look of
the images by that DA lens. Damn.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Very good shots, there were enough photo ops on this one hike to last
a month of Sundays. I enjoyed browsing this paw as much as any in the
past year. But you left me wanting for info - who are the folks, and
why only one coloring book.
--
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, John Mustarde wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Very good shots, there were enough photo ops on this one hike to last
a month of Sundays. I enjoyed browsing this paw as much as any in the
past year. But you left me wanting for info - who are the
So what is the lens that survived the distillation process in the
40-55mm focal length range?
Actually, the choice of a lens depends much on the choice of the other
lenses. If you like the 35/f2, the 43 would be too close, wouldn't it?
If you have a 28mm wide-angle, the 43 fits much better.
frank theriault wrote:
Wonderful photo. You've really captured the
exhaustion of a day's competition (not to mention
travel and preparation). You've also capturered the
bond between these two women, leaning on each other
for (it appears)
Yeah its too bad they don't pass through the AF
stuff, you would think they would redo them, keep the
same optics to keep the development costs down but
just add the pass through for the AF.
Well for now I'll look into getting the AF adaptor
1.7 because I'm used to that and it will give me
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Holiday photo adventure in the mountains
So that was my 4th of July adventure. What was yours?
I note that you set out to shoot a red, white blue topic :-)
We went grocery shopping. July 4th doesn't mean as much to us as it
does
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:37:35 +0200, you wrote:
Hi all,
just checking, anyone know what a reasonable price is for an SMC A 100 2.8
macro?
Frank
From the replies I've seen, there is no reasonable price for this lens
- it sells for unreasonable prices.
If one really wants a lens to use and not
Digital Cameras On Channel Five Tonight
Quote from the forum AV Resources... 5.7.04
19:30 The Gadget Show (Entertainment)
Entertainment show devoted to boys who love their toys. This week's show
is all about the
Bob's laws of teleconverter use:
1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal lens.)
2.Teleconverters are really only useful on fast lenses. You can put a 2X
converter on a 300 f/4, but then you get a
Am Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:13:29 +0200
schrieb Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The 43 Limited was designed in the old fashioned way without
computer (well, mostly) in order to get that pre computer look from the
images the lens produce.
What do you mean by that?
Sorry, but I'm shure that this is
You tell me your bank details first...
Norm Baugher wrote:
Sure Mike, what's your work address?
Norm
mike wilson wrote:
Can you try sending the bank details to my work address, please? Thanks,
From the replies I've seen, there is no reasonable price for this
lens - it sells for unreasonable prices.
John is correct. The price of the lens is driven by scarcity, which
affects both collectors (who want 'em for and/or despite of their
scarcity) and users (who want 'em because they're
John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So a very quick search of the usual used sites found me a Kiron manual
focus 105/f2.8 Macro
Reputedly one of the really great macro lenses.
The 25-year-old Kiron cost about a hundred bucks, which was the going
rate and not some super lucky bargain.
KEH
Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob's laws of teleconverter use:
1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal lens.)
2.Teleconverters are really only useful on fast lenses. You can put a 2X
On 5/7/04, Rob Brigham, discombobulated, offered:
Digital Cameras On Channel Five Tonight
Quote from the forum AV Resources... 5.7.04
19:30 The Gadget Show (Entertainment)
Entertainment show devoted to boys who
1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal
lens.)
I don't recall anyone mentioning wide angle.
2.Teleconverters are really only useful on fast lenses. You can
put a 2X converter on a 300
Forgot the url:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2500081size=lg
I've been using a very soft brush for the dust etc and then using a
microfiber cloth to clean the raindrop marks etc. Does anyone have any other
methods that they use? Is the microfiber cloth slowly wiping away my SMC?
Should I be using that lens cleaner liquid stuff? Should I be using a lens
On 5/7/04, Tom Reese, discombobulated, offered:
I've been using a very soft brush for the dust etc and then using a
microfiber cloth to clean the raindrop marks etc. Does anyone have any other
methods that they use
Yes.
Is the microfiber cloth slowly wiping away my SMC?
Unknown.
Should I be
Here's a little evening color. Taken with *istD on aperature priority.
Hope this inspires a cheerful mode.
Larry from Prescott
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65382/1/5810092/Original
Lens cleaning tissues are to be avoided. Use some kind of lens cleaning
fluid with the microfiber cloth. The best is ROR, Residual Oil Remover.
William Robb turned me on to that. It's great.
Paul
On Jul 5, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
I've been using a very soft brush for the dust etc and
Surely the comparison of the 'Pro' digital camera against the film mega
enlargement should have been against an MF camera - which such a studio shot
would have been taken on if it was a real film shoot?
The film enlargement was better anyway ;-)
Malcolm
ROR is quite good. Much prefer ClearSight, however. A little easier to
use, also one can get some very high quality lens cleaning accessories,
such as a SUPER cloth.
http://www.clearsightusa.com/
ROR and ClearSight are both fine, and both will do a good job. The Filter
Connection also sells a
Hi!
JB Speaking of SMC F 4-5.6/70-210mm:
JB http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p4934830.html
JB This is not really as sharp as the shots made with my SONY DSC F717,
JB published last week: http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p4784879.html
Jens, isn't it correct that Sony boasts Carl Zeiss optic?
Here
Hi!
DZ After almost 15 years of marriage I've finally taken a picture of my
DZ wife that she actually likes!
DZ http://www.radix.net/~drzz/paw/karen1.html
I have only one subject for portraiture, but she never really resists
g...
I think it is a fine portrait as far as I can try and read your
Hi!
AG Grab shot taken from a pier on Long Island this weekend. cropped:
AG http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-05-30.html
Amita, I should ask here what exactly Stirling means?
I see that there is a message here that I cannot decipher because of
the language/culture barrier.
Thanks.
Boris
Hi!
GA Yet another of my ordinary shots. Posting to get constructive feedback :-)
GA http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2097641size=lg
Gaurav, I think it is worth considering cropping off a little on the
right. It wouldn't seem to hurt the composition.
Another almost random thought
Hi!
RS This PAW is the product of an experiment the focus of which was to preserve the
RS colours of the sun rise and sky in the image without sacrificing all detail in
RS its foreground.
RS To form the image I selectively combined two shots from a +_1 stop bracket in
RS Photoshop. I pasted the
Stirling is a fine old burgh in Scotland. No doubt there was/is a Lord
Stirling, and Lady Stirling would be his wife.
http://homepages.tesco.net/~scotlandweb/oldstg/pb6.html
John
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:44:03 +0200, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
AG Grab shot taken from a pier on
Hi!
MD One for the peanut gallery:
MD http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2417479
MD Yes, I'm getting a little stir crazy.
You might... g
Mark, I think the right one is a little underexposed. At least so it
comes across on my screen. But my monitor is profiled by my eyes and
hands, so
graywolf wrote:
.
It seems that my beliefs about mountain survival need to be reaccessed. I have
always known mountain weather can be dangerous, but I would never have though
that a 1/4 mile walk from the house in sunny weather could have turned so
suddenly to nearly a life threatening
On 6 Jul 2004 at 0:34, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote:
I was considering the 31ltd for quite some time. But then I have the
FA28/2.8AL and I just can't justify having two lenses that close (and that 31 is
one expensive lens)
The 31mm is one lens I definitely didn't regret buying, it's one of my
On 5 Jul 2004 at 18:47, Arnold Stark wrote:
So what is the lens that survived the distillation process in the
40-55mm focal length range?
I retained the 31, and a series of 50mm lenses, the 43 would have filled a gap
that really wasn't there for me photographically. 24mm is a problem FL for
It's a nice story, but it has absolutely no basis in fact.
(For a start, the English brandish two fingers, not just one.)
I think this whole finger thing came from wars between the French and
the British during medieval times. Evidently the French would remove
this finger form British
On 5 Jul 2004 at 18:35, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
He had what I would have called a smart card but
he called it something else and didnt
know the term smart Card - it was holding all
his pics from a recent trip to New Mexico.
The files are 1 mg... I'm guessing these are not
very good for
William Robb wrote:
Will Cesar ever completely corner the LX
market (and cause the extinction of 45 different species of
reptiles)?
He'll have to pry my three out of my cold dead fingers to do it.
William Robb
Your three reptiles???
annsan
On 5 Jul 2004 at 13:48, Fred wrote:
Still, the A 100/2.8 Macro is my favorite...
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user
On 5 Jul 2004 at 9:56, Verge Scott wrote:
Well for now I'll look into getting the AF adaptor
1.7 because I'm used to that and it will give me some
autofocus. I wish they weren't so hard to find and
expensive, but what can you do.
You just need to keep your eyes open, set up some automated
On 5 Jul 2004 at 15:08, William Robb wrote:
No.
True story from when I worked for a camera retailer.
The reps were putting on a dog and pony show for us. The Pentax rep
had a 50mm lens sitting on the table that he was inviting smokers to
but their cigarettes onto.
It was an excellent
Hi Boris
That is really very sharp! Very nice photograph, Boris.
My Pentax shots were made - not at f11 but more like 4-5.6. And the
autofocus caught the wrong point, I guess:
http://www.fotokritik.dk/visstort.html?pic=80252
Not too bad for full aperure, I think. More of my Pentax photographs
Brilliant photographs (PAW 7-8), Dario. And amazing colours.
all the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 5. juli 2004 23:05
Til: Dario Bonazza
Emne: Re: PAW 07: Before the rain
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After the
shot at the finish line, it's my favourite for a
couple of reasons: First, I quite consciously had the
sign in there. Second, I like the way the line of
riders arcs through the frame - that was conscious as
Hi,
I think this whole finger thing came from wars between the French and
the British during medieval times. Evidently the French would remove
this finger form British prisoners so they couldn't use a long bow
correctly, the British would brandish the middle finger to indicate its
Hi Boris!
I have a chance to get a SMC F 4-5.6/70-210mm at at a fairly reasonable
price.
Just want to confirm that this is the lens you used in the Parrot pic.
It's positively stunning!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 15:08, William Robb wrote:
No.
True story from when I worked for a camera retailer.
The reps were putting on a dog and pony show for us. The Pentax rep
had a 50mm lens sitting on the table that he was inviting smokers to
but their cigarettes onto.
It was an
Beautiful pics Jens!
I've been looking at the SMC F 4-5.6/70-210mm.
Now I'm seriously looking!
Hope I can learn to use it as well as you!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:21, Keith Whaley wrote:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/LXad4.jpg
Now, THAT's impressive!
I've bookmarked it for my Pentax files. Thsnks!
Hi Keith,
I should have taken the time to properly attribute it. It was sent to me some
time back by a lister Greg E
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: lens cleaning
Your three reptiles???
Three entire species...
WW
- Original Message -
From: Krisjanis Linkevics
Subject: Re: 43 Limited
I was considering the 31ltd for quite some time. But then I have
the
FA28/2.8AL and I just can't justify having two lenses that close
(and that
31 is one expensive lens)
Unless the 28 is one stellar lens, the
Photo Life was from what country? Ive been buying photo mags for quite
a few years, and I'm not sure it rings a bell...
Small matter, as I just want it for record... amazing feat.
Thanks again, keith
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:21, Keith Whaley wrote:
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Stop reminding me Rob!! You know I can't afford it. g
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: lens cleaning
Photo Life was from what country? Ive been buying photo mags for
quite
a few years, and I'm not sure it rings a bell...
Small matter, as I just want it for record... amazing feat.
Canada.
Our cigarettes may burn
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:39, Alan Chan wrote:
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Stop reminding me Rob!! You know I can't afford it. g
Har, David Nelson will probably have a play with it this week, if he is a
convert then you'll have two of us to deal with. LOL
Rob Studdert
I much prefer if it didn't have a fixed hood as well. It forces me to use
the lousy push-on cap.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Unless the 28 is one stellar lens, the 31 is better.
They really got it right with this lens.
My only quibbles are with it's physical size (It's a pretty big
Gak! Don't say that Rob, I'm lusting after too much expensive stuff
already! (-:
David
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:39, Alan Chan wrote:
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Stop reminding me Rob!! You know I can't afford it. g
Har, David Nelson will probably have a
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:38, Keith Whaley wrote:
Small matter, as I just want it for record... amazing feat.
I'm sure that coatings aren't a precious as many people make out, I'm not at
all scared to rip into my late Leica lenses with anything that's on hand
especially after reading the following
Still, the A 100/2.8 Macro is my favorite...
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Er, no, not yet, Rob. But, if I ever do spring for it, I'll have
you to blame/thank, for sure... vbg
I really would like to try the lens, Rob, but it's somewhat down on
the priorities list (with
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 5 Jul 2004 at 18:35, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
He had what I would have called a smart card but
he called it something else and didnt
know the term smart Card - it was holding all
his pics from a recent trip to New Mexico.
The files are 1 mg... I'm guessing these
Very nice. Very cheerful. Thanks.
Paul
On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Larry Hodgson wrote:
Here's a little evening color. Taken with *istD on aperature priority.
Hope this inspires a cheerful mode.
Larry from Prescott
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65382/1/5810092/Original
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: 43 Limited
I much prefer if it didn't have a fixed hood as well. It forces me
to use
the lousy push-on cap.
But it is an esthetically pleasing lens cap.
William Robb
On 5 Jul 2004 at 20:05, Fred wrote:
Still, the A 100/2.8 Macro is my favorite...
I can tell you haven't tried the V125/2,5 yet :-)
Er, no, not yet, Rob. But, if I ever do spring for it, I'll have
you to blame/thank, for sure... vbg
I really would like to try the lens, Rob, but it's
I stopped at Wal-Mart today and bought a couple of those throw away plastic
ponchos (87 cents each). One for the camera kit, one for the fanny pack I often
wear when out walking. Hopefully that will solve that problem.
Seven years is not enough for you to be claiming mom-ship over me, young
anndigisan!
--
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
YOu guys will hurl abuse at me for this, I know,
but on eof my friends who had
come over to watch with me had a Canon (G-1?)
digital and I ended up confiscating it
to shoot - I must have spat out about 50 shots and
jsut barely started to get the hang of
For some reason when I read this a scenario popped up in my head.
You are about to take a photo when a truck (sorry Cotty, lorry) goes by spashing
oily, muddy, water, and fresh tar onto your lens. Just a minute ago You had
blown your runny nose into that clean handkerchief...
Now you know why
I much prefer if it didn't have a fixed hood as well. It forces me to
use the lousy push-on cap.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Unless the 28 is one stellar lens, the 31 is better.
They really got it right with this lens.
My only quibbles are with it's physical size (It's a pretty big
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:50, Alan Chan wrote:
I much prefer if it didn't have a fixed hood as well. It forces me to use
the lousy push-on cap.
The fixed hood saved my 31LTD, it's a pity Kennedys had to straighten it out to
replace it as I didn't get a picture of it in it's bent state.
Rob
I thought the idea of CW metering was to help expose subjects that may
be a bit dark and bring out the shadowish areas a bit more.
No, it is program metering that favors shadows. It is designed so that
point-and-shooters can take pix of backlit relatives and still have the
faces come out. In
Hi!
AS Gotta help with my photo career , no?
AS Got mixed reviews in papers but wow - two thumbs
AS up from the TV guys!
AS Here is a thing I slapped quickly together for my
AS Scrabble friends -
AS IN the film, they used a few pictures I put
AS together on a borrowed camera
AS when Joe Edley
Hi!
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/sale/craig-ss01.html
SB You'll have to exit your browser manually when you're done with the pics.
SB 3 pics, each about 190K.
How so?
SB I may add a few more to this little story later on. Time to go to work
SB Aaack!
Seems you did not.
I almost
Hi!
SB Here's another from our day at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. I
SB don't know if it needs a title, but a few crossed my mind ... anyway,
SB regardless of what it's called, maybe you'll find it interesting or worthy
SB of a second look
SB
Yes, there is ... I screwed up. I intended to post an adjusted version and
it looks like I didn't. Thanks for catching that, Boris.
But y'know, going back now and comparing the two side by side, I'm not sure
if I don't like the tilted one a little better. It has a softer quality
to me.
Shel
graywolf wrote:
I stopped at Wal-Mart today and bought a couple of those throw away plastic
ponchos (87 cents each). One for the camera kit, one for the fanny pack I often
wear when out walking. Hopefully that will solve that problem.
Seven years is not enough for you to be claiming
graywolf wrote:
I knew I'd regret my confession!
a
anndigisan!
--
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
YOu guys will hurl abuse at me for this, I know,
but on eof my friends who had
come over to watch with me had a Canon (G-1?)
digital and I ended up confiscating it
to shoot - I must
Rip it apart...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3990.jpg
William Robb
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
AS Gotta help with my photo career , no?
AS Got mixed reviews in papers but wow - two thumbs
AS up from the TV guys!
AS Here is a thing I slapped quickly together for my
AS Scrabble friends -
AS IN the film, they used a few pictures I put
AS together on a
For an ultra wide zoom going from 12-24 I suppose its decent. It's pretty
soft obviously... Looking at your shots it appears that F11 is
significantly softer than F16, which is unacceptable IMO. The trees and
foliage quickly become green mats rather than delineated leaves and twigs.
Having to
I like what you were going for. If the sky was blue, and not cloudy, and
the grass in the foreground cleaner, I'd be inclined to like it. As it
stands, its rather boring. Also, I think I would ditch the tree there, and
focus on the horizontal aspects.
-el gringo
-Original Message-
Not happy with lo-res scans on CDs and the labs want an outrageous price for
hi-res scans. Thinking about getting a Pacific Imaging 3650 Pro - Anyone
have any experience or insights into this?
Paul
William Robb wrote:
Rip it apart...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3990.jpg
William Robb
Now where did I put my scissors vbg
It's lovely, Wheatfield - is that mustard growing?
(the mustard growing, the wind blowing)
I'm sleepy
annsan
Hi Bill,
I'm inclined to agree with el gringo (who the hell is THAT! Maybe a friend
of That Guy? LOL)
Yes, the tree or bush is obviously obscuring a boring sky and a
putrid-green grass. The field of yellow should be orange, the sky darker,
the foreground foreshadowed, and the depth of field
Just in case my message got lost in my earlier message, I like this shot a
lot ... its simplicity allows one to walk right into it, become a part of
the environment, feel the gentle breeze and enjoy the fresh, slightly heavy
air. Ahhh ... another Haiku photograph ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
98 matches
Mail list logo
