RE: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-16 Thread Wade Chandler
their time helping you. ;-) Wade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcos S. Trazzini Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!! On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 21:02, Joseph A

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread MKlinke
On Monday 15 September 2003 19:02, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote: > I'm Using fetchmail to synch some accounts with remote POP3 servers. > > But if I set then to "keep" the messages on server, fetchmail > download the already downloaded messages on the next run !!! > > This result in a lot of repeated m

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 15 September 2003 20:58, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an attempt to be witty or informative: > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 22:36, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Monday 15 September 2003

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Marcos S. Trazzini
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 22:36, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 15 September 2003 20:15, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an > attempt to be witty or informative: > > > Ah... If I configure fetchmail to "flush" the messages, all works > > perf

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 15 September 2003 20:15, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an attempt to be witty or informative: > Ah... If I configure fetchmail to "flush" the messages, all works > perfectly... but I don't have a copy of the messages on the server > !!!

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Marcos S. Trazzini
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 21:50, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 15 September 2003 19:32, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an > attempt to be witty or informative: > > > Negative !!! > > > > If I configure the "same" account in Evolution (in ex

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Marcos S. Trazzini
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 21:34, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote: > > > Negative !!! > > > > If I configure the "same" account in Evolution (in example), only the > > "new" messages are downloaded, and "only" one time. but the > > fetchmail download the

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 15 September 2003 19:32, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an attempt to be witty or informative: > Negative !!! > > If I configure the "same" account in Evolution (in example), only the > "new" messages are downloaded, and "only" one time..

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Jason Dixon
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote: > Negative !!! > > If I configure the "same" account in Evolution (in example), only the > "new" messages are downloaded, and "only" one time. but the > fetchmail download the same messages that are in the remote POP3 server > every time

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Marcos S. Trazzini
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 21:02, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > On Monday 15 September 2003 19:02, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an > attempt to be witty or informative: > > I'm Using fetchmail to synch some accounts with remote POP3 servers. > > > > But if I set then to "keep" the messages on server, f

Re: Fetchmail don't keep messages !!!

2003-09-15 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 15 September 2003 19:02, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote this in an attempt to be witty or informative: > I'm Using fetchmail to synch some accounts with remote POP3 servers. > > But if I set then to "keep" the messages on server, fetchmail > downl

Re: Fetchmail, daemon or cron?

2003-06-10 Thread Jon Haugsand
* Daniel A. Chartrand > QUESTION: In Redhat 9, is there a Daemon that automatically checks for mail or > do i need to do a Cron job? Here is my ~/.fetchmailrc file: set daemon 30 poll OSLOMAIL2 protocol imap username "nbjhh1" keep stripcr It checks every 30 seconds. (Remove keep, it you don't

Re: fetchmail and sendmail

2003-06-07 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 07-Jun-2003/14:25 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I am using fetchmail and sendmail as a dialup mailserver. I have >configured sendmail to operate in queued Delivery mode. So whenever any >users connect to my server and send mail, then their mails are first >queued and then sent when connectio

Re: fetchmail and sendmail

2003-06-07 Thread Jiann-Ming Su
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am using fetchmail and sendmail as a dialup mailserver. I have > configured sendmail to operate in queued Delivery mode. So whenever any > users connect to my server and send mail, then their mails are first > queued and then sent when connection

Re: fetchmail

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:55:56 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When fetchmail downloads message from pop server it queus mail in > /var/spool/mqueue instead of sending to local mailboxes. I have defined my domain > as localdomains in fetchamilrc als

Re: Fetchmail, daemon or cron?

2003-06-06 Thread MKlinke
On Friday 06 June 2003 17:42, Daniel A. Chartrand wrote: > I have created a /home/someuser/.fetchmailrc file. > > QUESTION: In Redhat 9, is there a Daemon that automatically checks > for mail or do i need to do a Cron job? > > I would like the mail to be checked every few minutes. If there is a > D

RE: Fetchmail, daemon or cron?

2003-06-06 Thread Richard Humphrey
use fetchmail -d and you can use ps -auxw | grep fetchmail to see if the process is running. i.e. fetchmail -d 60 will ch3eck every 60 seconds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel A. Chartrand Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:43 AM To: [EMA

Re: Fetchmail, daemon or cron?

2003-06-06 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Daniel A. Chartrand wrote: I have created a /home/someuser/.fetchmailrc file. QUESTION: In Redhat 9, is there a Daemon that automatically checks for mail or do i need to do a Cron job? I would like the mail to be checked every few minutes. If there is a Daemon for fetchmail that accomplishes what

RE: fetchmail

2003-06-06 Thread Richard Humphrey
Did you tell fetchmail what user to send the mail to in your .fetchmailrc? something like this? username password is -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fetc

Re: Fetchmail and system-wide configuration

2003-02-11 Thread Jeffrey Tadlock
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 05:27:13AM +1100, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > Awuku Danso wrote: > > Hi all > > I'm currently running fetchmail as a user with a .fetchmailrc from the user's home >directory and it seems to work fine. What I really do want is to run it as a service >or daemon at boot time with

Re: Fetchmail and system-wide configuration

2003-02-11 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:40, Awuku Danso wrote: > Hi all > I'm currently running fetchmail as a user with a .fetchmailrc from the user's home >directory and it seems to work fine. What I really do want is to run it as a service >or daemon at boot time without any user intervention i.e without log

Re: Fetchmail and system-wide configuration

2003-02-11 Thread mklinke
Awuku, I use a startup script in /etc/init.d as follows: -- #!/bin/sh # # fetchmail Script to up/down mail retrieval daemon # # chkconfig: 345 82 30 # description: fetchmail is a mail retrieval and forwarding utility; it \ # fetches mail from remote mailservers and forwa

Re: Fetchmail

2003-02-04 Thread irwin
If your computer is on 7/24, maybe your ISP will send all mail directly to you without being stored in a mailbox on his computer. Then your RH can be the mail server and eliminate the need for fetchmail. That's the way mine works. Irwin On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:25 am, you wrote: > Hi

RE: Fetchmail

2003-02-04 Thread Brian James
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fetchmail > (By the way it's worked fine for about a year now, and as far as I > know nothing has changed recently. > > fetchmail: POP3> TOP 1 > fetchmail: P

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03 Feb 2003 11:54:56 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > Just curious, is this a case where > > > > echo "2" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr > > > > or > > > > sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_dynaddr=2 > > > > (and a corresponding entry in /etc/sysctl.

Re: Fetchmail

2003-02-03 Thread Edward Dekkers
> (By the way it's worked fine for about a year now, and as far as I know > nothing has changed recently. > > fetchmail: POP3> TOP 1 > fetchmail: POP3< +OK > reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 > of 35 (36049 octets) > #***.***[dit dash dot]***

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-03 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I assume you mean the the ‐‐timeout setting? Ahh. Sorry, you didn't explain you'd already seen/tried that. > appreciate this setting in regards to my problem. The default setting is > 300 sec. Given that my connection time is < 60 sec (haven't timed it, > but definitely less than 300), then I

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-03 Thread Edward Dekkers
> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 04:15, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Just curious, is this a case where > > > > echo "2" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr > > > > or > > > > sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_dynaddr=2 > > > > (and a corresponding entry in /etc/sysctl.conf) would help? > > For the benefit of the peanut

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-03 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 04:15, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Just curious, is this a case where > > echo "2" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr > > or > > sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_dynaddr=2 > > (and a corresponding entry in /etc/sysctl.conf) would help? For the benefit of the peanut gallery, what woul

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31 Jan 2003 23:35:33 +1300, Roland Hill wrote: > I have started getting the following error in the fetchmail log: > > fetchmail: Query status=2 (SOCKET) > > The consequence is that mail is not retrieved for my home network. > > My modem is confi

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-03 Thread Roland Hill
Edward/List, >Yes, it can. I didn't know this until I just had a look at the manual >pages. I assume you mean the the ‐‐timeout setting? >Because you're a new user, I'll assume you've never used the man pages >before. Well, I know better than that having observed this List for 6 months and ma

Re: Fetchmail problem with demand dailing

2003-02-02 Thread Edward Dekkers
> As a new user I would appreciate any ideas on how I could solve this > problem. Can fetchmail be "told" to wait longer before hanging? > > Regards, > > Roland Hill Yes, it can. I didn't know this until I just had a look at the manual pages. Because you're a new user, I'll assume you've never us

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2003-01-06 Thread mklinke
Awuku, While I've never used the multidrop syntax, there is an example in the "man fetchmail" listing. Do a search for "mult-drop" and it should plop you right there. Regards, Mike Klinke On Monday 06 January 2003 11:34, Awuku Danso wrote: > Thanks to all and Eddie is right. There is only

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2003-01-06 Thread Awuku Danso
Thanks to all and Eddie is right. There is only one user with one password at the ISP end; and this user may have as many email addresses as possible. So what I have done is created email addresses with the names of users on my local network. The whole picture looks like this: My username at th

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-29 Thread Tim Kehres
rnational Messaging Associates http://www.ima.com - Original Message - From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames > > I'm not sure ho

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-28 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I'm not sure how simple or difficult it is to do this with sendmail, however > the approach is guaranteed to misdeliver mail. The reason is that when > Internet mail is in transit - it is sent with two components - the message > content (what you see with your client plus 822 message headers),

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-28 Thread Tim Kehres
EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "kehres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "redhat-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 4:55 AM Subject: Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames > Thanks for your response. All mail on the ISP side, irrespective of th

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-27 Thread Awuku Danso
Thanks for your response. All mail on the ISP side, irrespective of the username, is delivered to a single mailbox. But there must be a way to tell sendmail after it's received it from fetchmail, to deliver to the various recipients as per the "TO" FIELD Awuku >>> Tim Kehres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-27 Thread Edward Dekkers
> Depending on your needed options (man fetchmail) a set of fetchmail > entries in your fetchmailrc configuration file might be. > > - > > poll with proto POP3 > user 'user1' there with password 'user1_password' is 'user10' here > options fetchall Uhm, if I underst

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-24 Thread mklinke
Awuku, Depending on your needed options (man fetchmail) a set of fetchmail entries in your fetchmailrc configuration file might be. - poll with proto POP3 user 'user1' there with password 'user1_password' is 'user10' here options fetchall poll with

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-24 Thread Tim Kehres
Hello, How many mailboxes do you have with the ISP? In other words - is mail for each user account described being delivered to a DIFFERENT mailbox on the ISP, or are they all being delivered to a single mailbox? For this to work properly, each user should have mail delivered to unique mailbox

Re: Fetchmail, Sendmail and multiple usernames

2002-12-24 Thread Rupendra Singh
> Hi all > I want to configure fetchmail to POP mail for all my users from my ISP to my local mail server running sendmail. At the moment it fetches the mail and delivers everything to one user but what I really want is for each user's mail to be delivered to their mailbox on the mail server. For

Re: Fetchmail and Fetchmailconf

2002-12-10 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 December 2002 09:05 am, Awuku Danso wrote: > Hi all > Does any anyone know where I can get a fetchmailconf rpm that will work > with the version of fetchmail (5.9.0-20.i386) that comes with RedHat > 8.0? I got hold of Fetchmailconf-5.9.

Re: fetchmail

2002-11-25 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25-Nov-2002/15:41 -0600, "Simpson, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I going to try and configure Fetchmail for 5 different people and their >POP3 accounts. I have fetchmail on my server and Postfix. The Postfix >is configured but the Fetchmail is

Re: fetchmail error not understood

2002-11-11 Thread dbrett
Hi Ed Sorry for not including all the searching and look ups we had done. We had searched Microsoft and the internet. All the things mentioned in what you kindly sent and what we had found were checked. This was the reason for my query. david On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Mon, No

Re: fetchmail error not understood

2002-11-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:15:52PM -0500, dbrett wrote: > I have been getting my mail from the companies email server (microsoft > exchange) for long time with fetchmail. This morning I ran fetchmail and > pulled off 100+ messages without any problem. An hour later I tried again > and got the fol

Re: fetchmail vulnerability

2002-10-10 Thread Edward Dekkers
> How do I know if I'm using fetchmail. I dont' think I am but am not > sure. If your're not sure, you don't need it. 'rpm -q fetchmail' will tell you if it's installed. 'rpm -e ' will uninstall it. --- Edward Dekkers (Director) Triple D Computer Services P/L -- redhat-list mailing list u

Re: fetchmail vulnerability

2002-10-09 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Oct-2002/09:46 -0500, "scott.list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >How do I know if I'm using fetchmail. I dont' think I am but am not >sure. Fetchmail is generally started by the user issuing the command, or adding the command to a script. It is

Re: Fetchmail

2002-07-10 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-Jul-2002/17:31 -0300, Marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:31, Marcelo wrote: >> > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat 7.2. >The system hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf an

Re: Fetchmail

2002-07-10 Thread Marcelo
fni" is marcelo here with options rewrite mimedecode flush pass8bits Can you tell me if there is any problem ? Thanks, Marcelo. - Original Message - From: "Jay Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:43 PM Subject

Re: Fetchmail

2002-07-03 Thread Jay Daniels
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:31, Marcelo wrote: > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat 7.2. The system >hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf and, when I try to reboot, the system >hangs in "Configuring Linuxconf hooks". So, if I disable the module fetchmail i

Re: Fetchmail

2002-07-03 Thread Kevin MacNeil
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:31:51PM -0300, Marcelo wrote: > > Hi, I'm getting a problem using fetchmail with linuxconf in Red Hat > 7.2. The system hangs while configuring fetchmail in linuxconf and, > when I try to reboot, the system hangs in "Configuring Linuxconf > hooks". So, if I disable the

Re: Fetchmail from POP3 to Exchange Server through Procmail

2002-06-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Zelda Popovich wrote: > Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3 > mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using > SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange > server. I have the fetchmail to Exch

Re: Fetchmail from POP3 to Exchange Server through Procmail

2002-06-05 Thread Karl O . Pinc
On 2002.06.04 08:17 David Christensen wrote: > Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3 > mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using > SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange > server. I have the fetchmail to Ex

Re: Fetchmail from POP3 to Exchange Server through Procmail

2002-06-05 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 20:03, Zelda Popovich wrote: > Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3 > mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using > SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange > server. I have the fetchmail

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-16 Thread Hardy Merrill
I'm no fetchmail expert, but I believe that by default fetchmail needs an MDA(Mail Delivery Agent, such as Sendmail) listening on Port 25, as Alan said. But the fetchmail docs('man fetchmail' on Linux) explain how to "force mail to be passed to an MDA directly(rather than forwarded to port 25)",

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-16 Thread Alan Harding
I know that this may sound silly, but I had the same problem and then discovered that the localhost line in (/etc/)hosts was wrong. If thats ok try 'telnet 127.0.0.1 25' you should get some response back. If not then thats where the issue lies On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:47, Henning, Brian wrote:

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-13 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13-May-2002/10:47 -0500, "Henning, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I am trying to get fetchmail to fetch my email and put it in my inbox on my >redhat box but i am having some problems. I get a error message of 'SMTP >connect to localhost fai

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-13 Thread mjbjr
It looks to me as if it is actually getting at least some of the mail, but that it is not being distributed locally. Can you email to yourself locally, i.e., to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever it is)? or from another user on the same machine? My bet is you can't. Once you get that right, I thi

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-13 Thread Ray Curtis
> "bh" == Brian Henning writes: bh> Hello, bh> I am trying to get fetchmail to fetch my email and put it in my inbox on my bh> redhat box but i am having some problems. I get a error message of 'SMTP bh> connect to localhost failed' as shown below. I am pretty sure I have it

Re: fetchmail

2002-05-13 Thread dbrett
Hi Brian I would suggest try using fetchmailconf. It should make setting it up easier. david On Mon, 13 May 2002, Henning, Brian wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to get fetchmail to fetch my email and put it in my inbox on my > redhat box but i am having some problems. I get a error message

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread Statux
make sure fetchmail isn't being started with the --all option On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, cameron wrote: > I'm having trouble configuring fetchmail so that it only downloads `new' mail > and keeps `seen' mail on the server. In .fetchmailrc I have `no fetchall' as > one of my user options in addition t

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread cameron
> > This doesn't solve my problem. `keep' does nothing more than prevent > > seen messages from being deleted which I have no problem with. The > > problem I have is that fetchmail downloads seen messages while I only > > want the new messages downloaded which `no fetchall' (a default, so > > ma

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread ABrady
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:28:16 -0500 cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > > > I'm having trouble configuring fetchmail so that it only downloads > > > `new' mail and keeps `seen' mail on the server. In .fetchmailrc I > > > have `no fetchall' as one of my user options in addition to > >

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread cameron
> > man fetchmail > > The info file goes into more depth as they tend to do. My mistake, the info page just contains the manpage. Cameron ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread cameron
> > I'm having trouble configuring fetchmail so that it only downloads > > `new' mail and keeps `seen' mail on the server. In .fetchmailrc I > > have `no fetchall' as one of my user options in addition to `keep', > > but fetchmail still downloads `seen' messages. > > man fetchmail The info file

Re: fetchmail

2002-04-26 Thread ABrady
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:10:08 -0500 cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > I'm having trouble configuring fetchmail so that it only downloads > `new' mail and keeps `seen' mail on the server. In .fetchmailrc I > have `no fetchall' as one of my user options in addition to `keep', > but f

RE: Fetchmail to Exchange

2002-04-12 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: >What would the command-line option be to retrieve mail from >'mail.domain.com' with user 'john' and password 'doe' and have it forward to >'mail.server.com' to user [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Create a fetchm

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-12 Thread jack wallen
nope. that's the strange thing. i've not done anything to this box. i've been using the same setup for 3 years now. the one thing is is that IT is transitioning over to an exchange 2k box. during the process the moved the mailboxes to the 2k server and realized that had more to do - so they mo

RE: Fetchmail to Exchange

2002-04-12 Thread Devon Harding - GTHLA
IL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fetchmail to Exchange -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: >Can fetchmail pull from a pop3 host and forward to an internal Exchange

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-12 Thread Jack Wallen
that's the trick! thank you so much Anthony! On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 02:24, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server. > >the output i included was

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-11 Thread Edward Marczak
On 4/10/02 4:12 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message: > yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server. > the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run. Then I concur with Tony - if you're not using fetchmail's '-S' option to fo

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server. >the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run. Then the server that is rejecting you is your own local machine (the Linux box).

Re: Fetchmail to Exchange

2002-04-10 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: >Can fetchmail pull from a pop3 host and forward to an internal Exchange >server? man fetchmail - -S , --smtphost (Keyword: smtp[host]) Specify a hunt list of hosts to

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread jwallen
yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server. the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run. On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Edward Marczak wrote: > On 4/10/02 2:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message: > > > our corporation is mucki

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread Edward Marczak
On 4/10/02 2:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message: > our corporation is mucking with their exchange server. i've been getting > email off it with fetchmail for about 3 years now and all of a sudden they > are adding spam filters left and right. well no

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread jwallen
actually the spam filtering is being done at the IT level which i have no control over. :-( On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Statux wrote: > Do you have a spam filter configured into sendmail for user jwallen? Looks > as if it's finding too many messages for that user coming in so sendmail > is blocking

Re: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread Statux
Do you have a spam filter configured into sendmail for user jwallen? Looks as if it's finding too many messages for that user coming in so sendmail is blocking them. fetchmail is cute in how it'll make sense of several rc file formats :) Mine looks similar to this: poll host proto pop3 user u

RE: fetchmail error

2002-04-10 Thread Ross Cooney
I am not sure...you are best to consult the fetchmail site: http://www.gnu.org/directory/fetchmail.html ross www.antivirus.ie ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: fetchmail?

2002-01-25 Thread Edward C. Bailey
> "gary" == gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: gary> Dear all, I just started to explore to fetchmail Any good/advise gary> where can I get started from After, about five minutes of poking around fetchmailconf I had it popping mail from several different ISPs with no problems. Never

RE: fetchmail config?

2002-01-22 Thread Pieter De Wit
Howzit, What I do is setup the .fetchmail for root with everyone in it defaults proto pop3 poll proto pop3 user pass "" is [EMAIL PROTECTED] fetchall poll proto pop3 user pass "" is [EMAIL PROTECTED] fet

Re: fetchmail config?

2002-01-22 Thread ABrady
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:32:26 +0800 "gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied: > Dear all, > > I just created a .fetchmailrc in individual home, to fetch mail from > mail server, it work fine, but is there a way to do it in root with > one.fetchmailrc file to fetch for all users, instead of doing it for

Re: fetchmail?

2002-01-22 Thread Nick Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 22-01-02 at 09:17 * gary said > Dear all, > > I just started to explore to fetchmail > Any good/advise where can I get started from I think the official site is www.tuxedo.org/~esr/fetchmail/ man fetchmail and check /usr/share/do

Re: Fetchmail v/s Getmail

2001-12-18 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:13:29AM +1100, Edwin Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Would anyone like to express their views as to the relative merits of fetchmail and |getmail? Fetchmail works, has workarounds for MANY buggy POP services out there, is fairly flexible. Getmail is expressly a

Re: fetchmail socket error? pls help..

2001-05-03 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- gregory mott wrote: >, no, it's really pop.ultra.net. jeez, >all that time i spent re-examining the firewall and >whatnot.. oh well, thanks much for your help!! And thank _you_ for posting your configs and supplying the actual server name. Lots of people mu

Re: fetchmail socket error? pls help..

2001-05-03 Thread gregory mott
>pnet4:dtalk 529 $ telnet smtp.ultra.net 110 >... >Are you sure there's a POP server at that address? d- , no, it's really pop.ultra.net. jeez, all that time i spent re-examining the firewall and whatnot.. oh well, thanks much for your help!! -g gregory mott tel 978-386-9986, icq 5856302 i p

Re: fetchmail socket error? pls help..

2001-05-03 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- gregory mott wrote: >fetchmail does nothing and gives the 'socket' >error code. pnet4:dtalk 529 $ telnet smtp.ultra.net 110 Trying 146.115.8.139... And there it hangs. But: pnet4:dtalk 530 $ telnet smtp.ultra.net 25 Trying 146.115.8.139... Connected to smtp

Re: fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Silviu Cojocaru wrote: >I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving >mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the >server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The >symptoms that mad

Re: fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, at 14:34 (GMT +0300), Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving > mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the > server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The > sympto

Re: fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread Chuck Mead
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Silviu Cojocaru blurted out: SC> SC>I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving SC>mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the SC>server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The SC>symptoms that

Re: fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread Matthew Melvin
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 at 2:34pm (+0300), Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > > I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving > mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the > server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The > symptoms

Re: fetchmail segfaults

2000-11-24 Thread Bret Hughes
Statux wrote: > And for either more future references.. if you ever need to reach any > server that communicates via plain text, just use telnet :) > > back in my day, we talked to servers with telnet all the time :P > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote: > > > Bret, > > > > For future

Re: fetchmail segfaults

2000-11-23 Thread Statux
And for either more future references.. if you ever need to reach any server that communicates via plain text, just use telnet :) back in my day, we talked to servers with telnet all the time :P On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote: > Bret, > > For future references, if ever you need to

Re: fetchmail segfaults

2000-11-22 Thread Gustav Schaffter
Bret, For future references, if ever you need to reach a POP3 server with other means than fetchmail, you may use: https://www.mail2web.com/sindex.html Regards Gustav Bret Hughes wrote: > > Fetchmail puked on a letter that I assume had too many email tos in the > header. Should I worry about

Re: fetchmail broken - 451 SMTP error

2000-09-04 Thread Statux
What is the full hostname of your box? If it's something bogus.. this might be causing it.. did you recently change anything with DNS or naming? On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Chip Rose. wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me why my fetchmail won't work anymore all of a > sudden? It worked fine until recen

Re: fetchmail broken - 451 SMTP error

2000-09-04 Thread Steve Manuel
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:05:08PM +, Chip Rose. wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me why my fetchmail won't work anymore all of a > sudden? It worked fine until recently - I don't know what's changed!. > I'm getting a 451 SMTP error - mail doesn't get to my mailbox anymore - > I can't unde

Re: Fetchmail / Procmail

2000-08-22 Thread Bret Hughes
Shanmuga Raj wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the response. Let me be more specific. > I am using domain name based mail forwading at my ISP. All users within my > office have individual e-mail IDs [EMAIL PROTECTED] My ISP forwards all > mails coming to mydomain.com into one POP3 mail box. Now, I collec

RE: Fetchmail / Procmail

2000-08-21 Thread Shanmuga Raj
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fetchmail / Procmail I'm assuming that all the email is addressed to one recipient. If that's the case, procmail can be configured to sort them by, say, mailing list. You'd sort on

Re: Fetchmail / Procmail

2000-08-21 Thread John P. Verel
I'm assuming that all the email is addressed to one recipient. If that's the case, procmail can be configured to sort them by, say, mailing list. You'd sort on the From header. If, however, the messages are for different users, you'd need to establish them as users on your system. Then sendmai

Re: Fetchmail / Procmail

2000-08-20 Thread Statux
> Hi, > I have configure fetchmail to to collect POP mails from my ISP. I have > defined the local delivery protocol as procmail. Currently all incoming > mails are getting delivered to one common mail box. Is it possible to > configure procmail in such a way, that it will read the To: headers in

  1   2   >