[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
While string quaity has been an issue for me (using gut), another factor to consider may be the location of the break: my strings tend to wear and fray either at the point of plucking or somewhere near the most used frets (2nd and 3rd). This has often enough been due to rough, calloused skin in cold weather; or inattention to nail care. Leonard Williams -Original Message- From: Dan Winheld <dwinh...@lmi.net> To: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com>; LuteNet list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Sent: Mon, Feb 19, 2018 11:54 am Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string Wim- No clue as to cause of the breakage until you supply essential information: 1. String length- nut to bridge? 2. A= ? 440, 415, 465, 392 - other? While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics. First thing in any case, get a good magnifier and check the nut and bridge for any irregularities that could snag the string, any rough spots that could abrade the string, A sharp "V" shape groove, too deeply cut in the nut is a fine way to jam a string as you fruitlessly try to wind it up to pitch. Take care of that stuff first, then assess the other factors. Dan On 2/18/2018 11:27 PM, Wim Loos wrote: > Dear luteplayers, > Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a > 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do > you suggest as an alternative. > Wim Loos > > -- > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
On 19/02/2018 17:53, Dan Winheld wrote: While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics. Unfortunately one cannot classify nylgut simply as 'White' or 'yellow New' as there have been numerous incarnations of both (the later white stuff was actually pretty good, more satisfactory to my mind than some of the strings produced recently). Best, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
Wim- No clue as to cause of the breakage until you supply essential information: 1. String length- nut to bridge? 2. A= ? 440, 415, 465, 392 - other? While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics. First thing in any case, get a good magnifier and check the nut and bridge for any irregularities that could snag the string, any rough spots that could abrade the string, A sharp "V" shape groove, too deeply cut in the nut is a fine way to jam a string as you fruitlessly try to wind it up to pitch. Take care of that stuff first, then assess the other factors. Dan On 2/18/2018 11:27 PM, Wim Loos wrote: Dear luteplayers, Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do you suggest as an alternative. Wim Loos -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
The problem of breackage of the thinner Nylgut strings was caused by some inner extruder parameters. The extrusion thecnology is very complex, so the problemi s not just related to the common knowledges in matter of breaking index etc . On this fyeld I am learning everyday something of new. I would like to say that I have fixed this problem a few months ago, around the 2017 summer. Always I had breakages on my renaissance lute of 61 cms tuned in G. This intrumentis my tester because there is no rider on the 1st string than can give an help. They are 5 months that it it tuned in A without any problem. After a couple of months I have asked to our early music distribitors and, since now, the problem of breakages drastically dropped. Just to inform you guys. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- Da: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Per conto di Matthew Daillie Inviato: lunedì 19 febbraio 2018 11:39 A: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> Cc: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com>; LuteNet list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Oggetto: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string I was presuming a pitch of 440 but Wim mentions neither pitch nor string length. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:22, Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@cs.dartmouth.edu> > wrote: > > A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415 To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
I was presuming a pitch of 440 but Wim mentions neither pitch nor string length. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:22, Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@cs.dartmouth.edu> > wrote: > > A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415 To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
Dear Wim, Since it is the stress (ie Tension p.u.cross sectional Area) on the string which causes it to break (at the 'Breaking Stress'), the critical factors for a particular string material are simply pitch and string length. Despite continuing mythology, absolute thickness is not relevant (provided there are no significant irregularities in the string material) - a thicker string will simply need a greater force (ie Tension) to reach the breaking stress than a thinner. The stress will be the same on the thick string as on the thinner. A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415 (giving a theoretical tension of around 3,9Kg) should below the breaking stress of nylgut - provided the formulation hasn't changed again (as Matthew points out) or there was a dud batch. I say 'theoretical' tension since slender strings thin significantly on stretching so the 'at pitch' diameter will be less than the unstressed diameter.. Why don't you contact Mimmo for his view? regards, Martyn __ From: Matthew Daillie <dail...@club-internet.fr> To: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com> Cc: LuteNet list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Sent: Monday, 19 February 2018, 9:37 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string You didn't mention the string length of your lute so we can't judge whether 0.44 is the right diameter or not (it would certainly be far too much for a 60 cm lute and would explain the snapping strings). Unfortunately breakage is a common problem with the current Nylgut top strings, particularly the 0.40 gauges. There best stuff was the shiny nylgut made in 2014 (apart from the first batch which was dodgy) but as apparently some players complained about the fact that it was smooth and didn't have any surface texture (??!!) they stopped producing it for lutes. You could try La Bella or Kürschner nylon. Some players also like carbon strings but I find them too thin for top courses. Good quality gut is obviously very satisfactory sonically but you would be extremely lucky to find any for a chanterelle that lasts more than a couple of days of intensive playing. There is at least one string maker using silk (an interesting, historic alternative) but I have no experience of that and I don't know whether he makes gauges suitable for chanterelles. Best, Matthew > On Feb 19, 2018, at 8:27, Wim Loos <[1]wjglso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear luteplayers, > Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a > 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do > you suggest as an alternative. > Wim Loos > > -- > To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:wjglso...@gmail.com 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
You didn't mention the string length of your lute so we can't judge whether 0.44 is the right diameter or not (it would certainly be far too much for a 60 cm lute and would explain the snapping strings). Unfortunately breakage is a common problem with the current Nylgut top strings, particularly the 0.40 gauges. There best stuff was the shiny nylgut made in 2014 (apart from the first batch which was dodgy) but as apparently some players complained about the fact that it was smooth and didn't have any surface texture (??!!) they stopped producing it for lutes. You could try La Bella or Kürschner nylon. Some players also like carbon strings but I find them too thin for top courses. Good quality gut is obviously very satisfactory sonically but you would be extremely lucky to find any for a chanterelle that lasts more than a couple of days of intensive playing. There is at least one string maker using silk (an interesting, historic alternative) but I have no experience of that and I don't know whether he makes gauges suitable for chanterelles. Best, Matthew > On Feb 19, 2018, at 8:27, Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear luteplayers, > Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a > 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do > you suggest as an alternative. > Wim Loos > > -- > To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Broeken nylgut string
Dear luteplayers, Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do you suggest as an alternative. Wim Loos -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] 'Shiny' nylgut
Does anyone have any of the small diameter shiny nylgut strings that Aquila produced in 2014 that they would be willing to sell? I am particularly interested in 0.38 and 0.44 gauge strings to put on my lute in a'. Please contact me off-list. Many thanks. Best, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
ah! right thanks Jan. see you at Paris in April? Takin beer togheter Mimmo From: [1]jmpoirier2 Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:31 AM To: [2]Mimmo Peruffo ; [3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: RE : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain Dear Mimmo, No problem at all about the duration of sound with your strings. I agree with Bruno Cognyl-Fournier : we are all very grateful - or we should be - for your brilliant a d continuous efforts to improve the quality of synthetic strings and the discussion about Mersenne and all that is only a way to satisfy our scholarly egos ð! But please keep up the good work and thank you again for everything you do to help us pluckers to improve our performances of early music! Best wishes da Francia, Jean-Marie Message d'origine De : Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> Date : 09/01/2017 6:33 PM (GMT+01:00) Ã : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Objet : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations: yes, I am out of stock due to some problems: the first one is that the plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is common when one exstrude plastics. I worked hard to understand why in these 15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The extruder broke the gear pump! heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday) I was in condition to find another way that is working pretty good but... my co-worker at the extruder right now has flu! another stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone. their lifetime? I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do not last 20 seconds From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM To: [2]Dan Winheld Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob MacKillop ; [7]Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu 4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr 5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr 2. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Dear Mimmo, No problem at all about the duration of sound with your strings. I agree with Bruno Cognyl-Fournier : we are all very grateful - or we should be - for your brilliant a d continuous efforts to improve the quality of synthetic strings and the discussion about Mersenne and all that is only a way to satisfy our scholarly egos ð! But please keep up the good work and thank you again for everything you do to help us pluckers to improve our performances of early music! Best wishes da Francia, Jean-Marie Message d'origine De : Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> Date : 09/01/2017 6:33 PM (GMT+01:00) Ã : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Objet : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations: yes, I am out of stock due to some problems: the first one is that the plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is common when one exstrude plastics. I worked hard to understand why in these 15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The extruder broke the gear pump! heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday) I was in condition to find another way that is working pretty good but... my co-worker at the extruder right now has flu! another stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone. their lifetime? I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do not last 20 seconds From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM To: [2]Dan Winheld Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob MacKillop ; [7]Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu 4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr 5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Huh? Folks, sound and vibration are one and the same. If the string can be seen to be vibrating and you can't hear it, it is either a problem with your hearing (which to be sure comes naturally with our advancing age), or there is sufficient ambient noise in the room or other notes being played that the sound is overwhelmed. You can be sure, that if the string is vibrating, there IS sound, whether your ears/brain sense it or not. The attenuation of the vibration follows a mathematical formula (exponential decay) that is related to internal damping and parasitic loss (which is energy transferred from the string to the body of the instrument). Attempting to ascribe a single time duration number to the sustain is an absurdity that violates the laws of physics. You can use a single number to approach some convenient threshold, say for example 75% attenuation (time to 75% reduction in volume), but 100% attenuation is something you would never be able to determine with any useful accuracy. Rob's video shows that it seems relatively easy to âqualitatively' assess the difference in sustain, but to put numbers on it, you would need to decide on some terminating threshold, and realize that the string is still vibrating and there is still sound beyond that terminating threshold. A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E. Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer EMail: [1]john.mardi...@asu.edu Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs) But don't call the labâ¦.I won't be there! On Jan 9, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Jean-Marie Poirier <[3]jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a precise observer and his observations are worth considering seriously. When he describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a lute, he takes care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute...", the sound is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after the ear has lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at all ! Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which the test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly influence the parameters of the experience... Best, Jean-Marie -- I am lucky: I have seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in these last years. Maybe I can be in mistake, but I have never seen a lute, whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose sustain is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in absolute the higher density) . I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive experience in matter. At present I would stick that Mersenne meant how many time last the vibration, not the sound. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM To: Mimmo Peruffo Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic. Best, Matthew= To get on or off this list see list information at [4]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmo uth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIFaQ=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGq yv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-L NEQ=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOl SP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo= References 1. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu 2. tel:408-921-3253 3. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr 4. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIFaQ=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOlSP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo=
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
"...and my guess is that these strings may last forever.." While no doubt true, and good thing as well, ALL unfingered lute bass strings last virtually forever! My Baroque lute student has had the original (and unspeakably vile) metal overspun strings on his otherwise very fine 13 course lute for at least 10 years now; only his 7th course is starting to become tolerable from the occasionally fingered A-flat and B-flat. I do my part keeping string builders and merchants afloat because of my perceived need for new & improved strings, and/or radical re-evaluations of tension/sonority/pitch considerations. Thanks to all for answering my little shopping questions- but as they are flying off the shelves so fast, I may have to wait awhile; at least until Mimmo gets the bugs out of the factory. Can't stand it when I can only get some a set to fill out a particular range. Onwards! Dan On 1/9/2017 9:02 AM, Bruno Cognyl-Fournier wrote: and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[1]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Dear Mimmo Don,t worry, I think we all appreciate your efforts, and are all excited about the new strings. Yes it has started another debate on strings and sound quality, vibration , resonnance, etc.. what it boils down to however , is what kind of sound pleases each of us individually. I for one have never been satisfied with wound strings, except the gut core wound strings from Savarez. and then again in my taste.. only when the strings are old and have been on the instrument for a long time... I am eager to receive my order from Cuerdas Pulsadas ( I sent you a private message about my order with you). Certainly with your new CD strings, it gives us yet another choice. thank you again Bruno 2017-01-09 12:33 GMT-05:00 Mimmo Peruffo <[1]mperu...@aquilacorde.com>: maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations: yes, I am out of stock due to some problems: the first one is that the plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is common when one exstrude plastics. I worked hard to understand why in these 15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The extruder broke the gear pump! heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday) I was in condition to find another way that is working pretty good but... my co-worker at the extruder right now has flu! another stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone. their lifetime? I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do not last 20 seconds From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM To: [2]Dan Winheld Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob MacKillop ; [7]Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8][2]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [9][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[4]fournier...@gmail.com 2. mailto:[5]dwinh...@lmi.net 3. mailto:[6]agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu 4. mailto:[7]dail...@club-internet.fr 5. mailto:[8]mperu...@aquilacorde.com 6. mailto:[9]robmackil...@gmail.com 7. mailto:[10]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 8. mailto:[11]dwinh...@lmi.net 9. [12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 4. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com 5. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 6. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu 7. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr 8. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 9. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 10. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 11. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations: yes, I am out of stock due to some problems: the first one is that the plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is common when one exstrude plastics. I worked hard to understand why in these 15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The extruder broke the gear pump! heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday) I was in condition to find another way that is working pretty good but... my co-worker at the extruder right now has flu! another stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone. their lifetime? I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do not last 20 seconds From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM To: [2]Dan Winheld Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob MacKillop ; [7]Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu 4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr 5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com 6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Dear all, We have some gauges still on stock, but they are running fast. You can also find everything on our store with 20% discount, so it's really a nice chance to try them. This is the website: [1]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com Mimmo is already part of the lute history, I dont have any doubt on that! Regards. 2017-01-09 17:56 GMT+01:00 Dan Winheld <[2]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Cuerdas Pulsadas [4]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [5]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com [6]BLOG || [7]AGENDA || [8]TIMELINE [9]blog [10]facebook [11]twitter [12]instagram -- References 1. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 4. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 5. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 6. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog 7. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/ 8. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline 9. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog 10. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas 11. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas 12. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
David Morales' cuerdas Pulsadas in Spain, has them, David Morales who is on this lute list should be able to help you out. Mimmo is out of stock already. Bruno 2017-01-09 12:02 GMT-05:00 Bruno Cognyl-Fournier <[1]fournier...@gmail.com>: and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[2]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com 2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
and my guess is that these strings may last forever.. Bruno 2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[1]dwinh...@lmi.net>: Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging as an obtainable, affordable, predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years. Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now available in the U.S? Thank you all- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Jakob Lindberg's remarks about the wonderful sustain of his old Rauwolf seems to confirm what you say (sustain, complexity and clarity, together according to JL). Mersenne would certainly have heard marvellous old Bologna lutes sought out by French luthenists, no doubt exactly for these qualities (rather than as antiques), but for all strings surely, not just for bass sustain or prominence. If the French revelled in bass sustain, which one might gather from Mersenne, wouldn't they have adopted demi-file, or kept on using the extended 12C lute? Yet, I seem to remember a quotation of the Burwell author, saying the French shunned the 12C lute exactly because of its bass course prominence and nazality. At least for this repertoire I have always imagined that a homogenous sustain through all strings is best, and that is what Mimmo's new basses do seem to give us. They have good sustain but on my lute at least, their low impedance allow the Means and Trebles to shine through. Regards Anthony Le 9 janv. 2017 à 10:52, Matthew Daillie <[1]dail...@club-internet.fr> a écrit : One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic. Best, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
I understand... this is the point: we scholars have done a long list of conceptual and practical mistakes done by Mersenne in his book. This mean that he must be taken with a grain of salt. Of course, he done a great job with his monumental treatise and it is very usefull also. I am a strict follower of Galileo Galilei's thinking: any affermation should be verified by pratical tests made by us. Well, I done these tests. with a gut roped loaded string we are in order of a few seconds, we are very far form a third of minutes mentioned by him. it is a bit more with modern wound strings ( 10 seconds, or around it) Now, why -a 5 time dense than gut- nylon wound string should have less sustain than an all gut string whose density is a lot less? This is against the phisics laws, not to our personal opinions. Mine too. - Maybe those strings were so well done to justify a lot of things: but they cannot be done so good to be better than any modern wound string. This because the sustain is relate to elasticity and density. Ciao! Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:42 AM To: Mimmo Peruffo ; Matthew Daillie Cc: Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List' Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a precise observer and his observations are worth considering seriously. When he describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a lute, he takes care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute...", the sound is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after the ear has lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at all ! Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which the test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly influence the parameters of the experience... Best, Jean-Marie -- I am lucky: I have seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in these last years. Maybe I can be in mistake, but I have never seen a lute, whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose sustain is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in absolute the higher density) . I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive experience in matter. At present I would stick that Mersenne meant how many time last the vibration, not the sound. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM To: Mimmo Peruffo Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic. Best, Matthew= To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a precise observer and his observations are worth considering seriously. When he describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a lute, he takes care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute...", the sound is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after the ear has lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at all ! Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which the test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly influence the parameters of the experience... Best, Jean-Marie -- >I am lucky: I have seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in >these last years. Maybe I can be in mistake, but I have never seen a lute, >whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose sustain >is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in >absolute the higher density) . >I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive >experience in matter. At present I would stick that Mersenne meant how >many time last the vibration, not the sound. >Mimmo > >-Messaggio originale- >From: Matthew Daillie >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM >To: Mimmo Peruffo >Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List >Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain > >One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain >from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just >how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge >of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 >seconds are not so unrealistic. >Best, >Matthew= > > > >To get on or off this list see list information at >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
I am lucky: I have seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in these last years. Maybe I can be in mistake, but I have never seen a lute, whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose sustain is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in absolute the higher density) . I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive experience in matter. At present I would stick that Mersenne meant how many time last the vibration, not the sound. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM To: Mimmo Peruffo Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic. Best, Matthew= To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Differences in string length can obviously also account for considerable variations in sustain. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic. Best, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Sorry to the list it was a private message to Rop, I sent it also to the list for mistake Mimmo To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
thanks Rob at present I have some troubles with the extruder plant. I do not know why but i am not able to do a new stock I hope to solve the problem soon. In ther meantime two gearpumps broken. Heck! This job is crazy, plastics are crazy: the change their behaviours over night! Ciao Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Rob MacKillop Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 8:49 AM To: Mimmo Peruffo Cc: Lute List Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain Good comments, Mimmo. I must say I am impressed with the Loaded Nylgut strings, and will definitely use them on from 6th to 13th courses. Congratulations on creating a very good string. Rob On 9 Jan 2017, at 07:24, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> wrote: Well, a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with modern wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut: i remember that the modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings types. Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the ticker. In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning gut: the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 while it should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire calculations, the equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc. One thing is to consider 20 second of sound and another thing is that the vibration of the string lasted till 20 seconds. I am thinking that it is the second case; i.e. the vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound. So one can hear the sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration of the string till its stop. I think that this is the only interpretetation that can work. In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very very efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this behaviour. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List' Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain The exact quotation from Mersenne is : "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or twenty times..." Amicalement, Jean-Marie -- Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. https://yho.com/footer0 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Good comments, Mimmo. I must say I am impressed with the Loaded Nylgut strings, and will definitely use them on from 6th to 13th courses. Congratulations on creating a very good string. Rob > On 9 Jan 2017, at 07:24, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> wrote: > > Well, a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with modern > wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut: i remember that the > modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings types. > Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the ticker. > In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning gut: > the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 while it > should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire calculations, the > equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc. One thing is to consider 20 > second of sound and another thing is that the vibration of the string lasted > till 20 seconds. I am thinking that it is the second case; i.e. the > vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound. So one can hear the > sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration of the string till > its stop. > I think that this is the only interpretetation that can work. > In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very very > efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this > behaviour. > Mimmo > > > -Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier > Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM > To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List' > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain > > The exact quotation from Mersenne is : > "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la > sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère > du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." > which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute > is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that > is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, > or twenty times..." > > Amicalement, > > Jean-Marie > > > > -- > >> Hi Rob, >> >> What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? >> Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. >> >> Chris >> [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone >> >> On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop >> <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila >>Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass >>string. >>[1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >>My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on >> the >>Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. >>With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note >>you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. >>The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c >> completely >>strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. >>On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 >>seconds!!! >>I'll stick with the Aquila. >>Rob >>-- >> References >>1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> >> -- >> >> References >> >> 1. https://yho.com/footer0 >> 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Well, a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with modern wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut: i remember that the modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings types. Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the ticker. In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning gut: the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 while it should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire calculations, the equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc. One thing is to consider 20 second of sound and another thing is that the vibration of the string lasted till 20 seconds. I am thinking that it is the second case; i.e. the vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound. So one can hear the sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration of the string till its stop. I think that this is the only interpretetation that can work. In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very very efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this behaviour. Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List' Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain The exact quotation from Mersenne is : "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or twenty times..." Amicalement, Jean-Marie -- Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. https://yho.com/footer0 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Rob MacKillopwrote: > > Good point, Howard. But still, twenty seconds is a long time. I am > certainly only interested in the time before clashing with the next > note or notes takes place, and that of course depends on the passage of > music. But generally speaking, even if we halve Mersenne's twenty > seconds, that is still much longer than even the Savarez string. And what do we make of Mersenne’s range of ten to twenty seconds/heartbeats? What’s he actually telling us? Some strings ten, others twenty? Useable sustain ten, total duration twenty? Results for one string were inconsistent? Depends on your heart rate? I’m sure we can up with a bunch of plausible interpretations, but in the end the information seems too uncertain to base any solid conclusion on it. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Good point, Howard. But still, twenty seconds is a long time. I am certainly only interested in the time before clashing with the next note or notes takes place, and that of course depends on the passage of music. But generally speaking, even if we halve Mersenne's twenty seconds, that is still much longer than even the Savarez string. On 8 January 2017 at 22:26, howard posner <[1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Rob MacKillop <[2]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade has been to minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely on board with this. But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we have been moving in the wrong direction - we should be at least doubling the sustain time. Could it be that you and Mersenne are talking about different things? You wrote about "useable sustain," which I take to mean "how long the note is musically significant or can interfere with new notes," or something similar. Mersenne sounds more like he's reporting results of an experiment like the one I just did: pluck the string in a quiet room and time how long you can hear it at all, which yields a very different number. Indeed, my total sustain time just now was more than double what I would call "useable sustain." Mersenne was primarily a scientist/mathematician (do a web search on him and you'll turn up all sorts of things about prime numbers), so we need to be alert to the possibility that he's giving us scientific data rather than practical musical information. To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com 2. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Rob MacKillopwrote: > > So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade has been to > minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely on board with this. > But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we have been moving in the > wrong direction - we should be at least doubling the sustain time. Could it be that you and Mersenne are talking about different things? You wrote about “useable sustain,” which I take to mean “how long the note is musically significant or can interfere with new notes,” or something similar. Mersenne sounds more like he’s reporting results of an experiment like the one I just did: pluck the string in a quiet room and time how long you can hear it at all, which yields a very different number. Indeed, my total sustain time just now was more than double what I would call “useable sustain.” Mersenne was primarily a scientist/mathematician (do a web search on him and you’ll turn up all sorts of things about prime numbers), so we need to be alert to the possibility that he’s giving us scientific data rather than practical musical information. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
On 08/01/2017 21:29, howard posner wrote: On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Rob MacKillop [1]wrote: Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French... Google Translate renders "le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Tor eille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'vne minutec'est à dire pendant q ue Tartere du poux d'un homme sain" as "The sound of the large strings of Luth is seen from the ear during the sixth pa rt, or the third of a minute is to be said while the tartar of the lice of a hea lthy man" I don't know you can improve on that. Top notch! Who needs translators? -- References 1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
On 08/01/2017 21:46, Jean-Marie Poirier wrote: The exact quotation from Mersenne is : "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or twenty times..." Amicalement, Jean-Marie 'sans emotion' means in a relaxed state To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade has been to minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely on board with this. But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we have been moving in the wrong direction - we should be at least doubling the sustain time. Confused of Edinburgh... > On 8 Jan 2017, at 20:46, Jean-Marie Poirier <jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > The exact quotation from Mersenne is : > "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la > sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère > du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." > which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute > is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that > is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, > or twenty times..." > > Amicalement, > > Jean-Marie > > > > -- > >> Hi Rob, >> >> What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? >> Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. >> >> Chris >> [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone >> >> On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop >> <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila >>Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass >>string. >>[1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >>My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on >> the >>Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. >>With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note >>you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. >>The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c >> completely >>strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. >>On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 >>seconds!!! >>I'll stick with the Aquila. >>Rob >>-- >> References >>1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> >> -- >> >> References >> >> 1. https://yho.com/footer0 >> 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 >> 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > >
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
On 08/01/2017 20:58, Christopher Wilke wrote: Thanks! [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 2:33 PM, David Morales [1]wrote: Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings. Check it out here: [1][2][2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings- by- aquila-corde/ There are some mistakes in the transcription of the excerpt in a modern font (part of which is highlighted), it is best to read the scan of the original. Best Matthew -- References 1. mailto:dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 2. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
The exact quotation from Mersenne is : "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..." which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or twenty times..." Amicalement, Jean-Marie -- > Hi Rob, > > What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? > Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. > > Chris > [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop > <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila > Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass > string. > [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 > My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on > the > Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. > With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note > you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. > The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c > completely > strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. > On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 > seconds!!! > I'll stick with the Aquila. > Rob > -- > References > 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 > To get on or off this list see list information at > [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > -- > >References > > 1. https://yho.com/footer0 > 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 > 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 > 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Thanks! [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 2:33 PM, David Morales <dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com> wrote: Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings. Check it out here: [1][2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings- by- aquila-corde/ Copied here: -- Let's take a look at [2]Harmonie universelle, contenant la thà ©orie et la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his lifetime (available [3]at gallica). Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass strings: * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons existent dauantage à raison de leur gayetà © qui vient de la promptitude de leurs movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les airs que l'on jouà © sur le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans . * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, à ´c que le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du poux d'vn homme sain, à ´c Ãà ns à ©motion bat dix, ou vingt fois: de sorte qu'il ne reste qu'à remarquer combien de fois la chorde bat Tair dans vne seconde minute, pour sà §auoir combien elle le frappe auant que de se repose Regards. 2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[4][3]robmackil...@gmail.com>: I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats, if I remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original. Rob On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke <[1][5][4]chriswi...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3][6][5]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4][7][6]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5][8][7]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [6][9][8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[10][9]chriswi...@yahoo.com 2. [11][10]https://yho.com/footer0 3. mailto:[12][11]robmackil...@gmail.com 4. [13][12]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 5. [14][13]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 6. [15][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Cuerdas Pulsadas [16]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [17][15]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com [18]BLOG || [19]AGENDA || [20]TIMELINE [21]blog [22]facebook [23]twitter [24]instagram -- References 1. [16]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by -aquila-corde/ 2. [17]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle 3. [18]http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR 4. mailto:[19]robmackil...@gmail.com 5. mailto:[20]chriswi...@yahoo.com 6. mailto:[21]robmackil...@gmail.com 7. [22]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 8. [23]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 9. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 10. mailto:[25]chriswi...@yahoo.com 11. [26]https://yho.com/foote
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Rob MacKillopwrote: > > Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French... Google Translate renders "le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'vne minutec'est à dire pendant que Tartere du poux d'un homme sain” as "The sound of the large strings of Luth is seen from the ear during the sixth part, or the third of a minute is to be said while the tartar of the lice of a healthy man” I don’t know you can improve on that. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French... Rob On 8 Jan 2017, at 19:33, David Morales <[1]dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com> wrote: Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings. Check it out here: [2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by- aquila-corde/ Copied here: -- Let's take a look at [3]Harmonie universelle, contenant la théorie et la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his lifetime (available [4]at gallica). Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass strings: * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons existent dauantage à raison de leur gayeté qui vient de la promptitude de leurs movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les airs que l'on joué sur le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans . * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, ôc que le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du poux d'vn homme sain, ôc Ãà ns émotion bat dix, ou vingt fois: de sorte qu'il ne reste qu'à remarquer combien de fois la chorde bat Tair dans vne seconde minute, pour sçauoir combien elle le frappe auant que de se repose Regards. 2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[5]robmackil...@gmail.com>: I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats, if I remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original. Rob On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke <[1][6]chriswi...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3][7]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4][8]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5][9]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[11]chriswi...@yahoo.com 2. [12]https://yho.com/footer0 3. mailto:[13]robmackil...@gmail.com 4. [14]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 5. [15]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 6. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Cuerdas Pulsadas [17]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [18]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com [19]BLOG || [20]AGENDA || [21]TIMELINE [22]blog [23]facebook [24]twitter [25]instagram -- References 1. mailto:dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 2. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-aquila-corde/ 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle 4. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR 5. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 6. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com 7. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 8. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 9. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 11. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com 12. https://yho.com/footer0 13. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 14. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 15. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 17. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 18. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 19. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog 20. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/ 21. http://
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings. Check it out here: [1]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by- aquila-corde/ Copied here: -- Let's take a look at [2]Harmonie universelle, contenant la théorie et la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his lifetime (available [3]at gallica). Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass strings: * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons existent dauantage à raison de leur gayeté qui vient de la promptitude de leurs movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les airs que l'on joué sur le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans . * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, ôc que le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du poux d'vn homme sain, ôc Ãà ns émotion bat dix, ou vingt fois: de sorte qu'il ne reste qu'à remarquer combien de fois la chorde bat Tair dans vne seconde minute, pour sçauoir combien elle le frappe auant que de se repose Regards. 2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[4]robmackil...@gmail.com>: I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats, if I remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original. Rob On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke <[1][5]chriswi...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3][6]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4][7]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5][8]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [6][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[10]chriswi...@yahoo.com 2. [11]https://yho.com/footer0 3. mailto:[12]robmackil...@gmail.com 4. [13]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 5. [14]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 6. [15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Cuerdas Pulsadas [16]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [17]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com [18]BLOG || [19]AGENDA || [20]TIMELINE [21]blog [22]facebook [23]twitter [24]instagram -- References 1. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-aquila-corde/ 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle 3. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR 4. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 5. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com 6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 7. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 8. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 10. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com 11. https://yho.com/footer0 12. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 13. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 14. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 16. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 17. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 18. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog 19. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/ 20. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline 21. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog 22. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas 23. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas 24. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats, if I remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original. Rob On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke <[1]chriswi...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com 2. https://yho.com/footer0 3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 4. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 5. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Hi Rob, What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain? Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail. Chris [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. https://yho.com/footer0 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Oups, sorry Rob for sending to wrong list AH Very relevant comparison Rob, and I also notice that on my 11C lute, the sustain of the new Aquila basses is almost identical to that of my Venice octaves (which presumably would not be the case with the Savarez. I imagine they would drone on longer if not stopped); but again if I pluck courses D10 and d2 together, they also have the same sustain. I think this shows how well the new basses work together with the other strings, rather than against them, as with wirewounds. I also find that they are fairly close to my Venice loaded basses (rather than the stiffer first generation HT loaded), but with better resonance patterns, and even more elasticity. I did have to alter my playing slightly to allow for this. Those coming from stiffer wirewounds may have more adapting to do, but will probably find this worthwhile; yet these very elastic basses may not work quite so well for low tension players, who could have adapted their technique to stiffer pure gut (HT or roped), Gimped, or even KF harp strings. It might be interesting to hear from players coming from different playing styles. Best regards Anthony Le 8 janv. 2017 à 16:59, Rob MacKillop <[1]robmackil...@gmail.com> a écrit : Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Very relevant comparison Rob, and I also notice that on my 11C lute, the sustain of the new Aquila basses is almost identical to that of my Venice octaves (which presumably would not be the case with the Savarez. I imagine they would drone on longer if not stopped); but again if I pluck courses D10 and d2 together, they also have the same sustain. I think this shows how well the new basses work together with the other strings, rather than against them, as with wirewounds. I also find that they are fairly close to my Venice loaded basses (rather than the stiffer first generation HT loaded), but with better resonance patterns, and even more elasticity. I did have to alter my playing slightly to allow for this. Those coming from stiffer wirewounds may have more adapting to do, but will probably find this worthwhile; yet these very elastic basses may not work quite so well for low tension players, who could have adapted their technique to stiffer pure gut (HT or roped), Gimped, or even KF harp strings. It might be interesting to hear from players coming from different playing styles. Best regards Anthony Le 8 janv. 2017 à 16:59, Rob MacKillop <[1]robmackil...@gmail.com> a écrit : Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
The complete opposite for me, John :-) At least we have a choice now. I don't want to spend half my time stopping every bass note from ringing on too long. Rob [1]www.robmackillop.net On 8 Jan 2017, at 17:59, John Mardinly <[2]john.mardi...@asu.edu> wrote: No contest-I use and love the Savarez (on my 8-course) not just because of the sustain, but they pick up the vibrations from the treble strings and give an ethereal sound to the instrument. It's like having your own cathedral at home without the expense. A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E. Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer EMail: [3]john.mardi...@asu.edu Cell: [4]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs) But don't call the labâ¦.I won't be there! On Jan 8, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[5]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][6]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8 FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=M AuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxg s2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [7]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk -5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvn WTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r40 18W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= To get on or off this list see list information at [8]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth .edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Eji z41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKG b8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vG Anwva6IfQbx-rWM= -- References 1. http://www.robmackillop.net/ 2. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu 3. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu 4. tel:408-921-3253 5. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 6. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= 7. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= 8. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vGAnwva6IfQbx-rWM=
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
No contest-I use and love the Savarez (on my 8-course) not just because of the sustain, but they pick up the vibrations from the treble strings and give an ethereal sound to the instrument. It's like having your own cathedral at home without the expense. A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E. Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer EMail: [1]john.mardi...@asu.edu Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs) But don't call the labâ¦.I won't be there! On Jan 8, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8 FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=M AuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxg s2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk -5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvn WTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r40 18W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= To get on or off this list see list information at [6]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth .edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Eji z41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKG b8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vG Anwva6IfQbx-rWM= References 1. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu 2. tel:408-921-3253 3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 4. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= 5. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco= 6. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vGAnwva6IfQbx-rWM=
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Thanks for sharing Rob, this is really helpful. I have also uploaded a short video yesterday, trying out these new synthetic loaded bass strings on a vihuela. [1]https://youtu.be/g1g7sZiknws By the way, let me share with you that these days we are offering a 20% discount on all strings available on Cuerdas Pulsadas, include these new loaded strings. [2]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com Best regards 2017-01-08 16:59 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com>: Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1][4]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. [5]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Cuerdas Pulsadas [7]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [8]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com [9]BLOG || [10]AGENDA || [11]TIMELINE [12]blog [13]facebook [14]twitter [15]instagram -- References 1. https://youtu.be/g1g7sZiknws 2. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com 4. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 5. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 7. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ 8. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com 9. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog 10. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/ 11. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline 12. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog 13. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas 14. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas 15. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas
[LUTE] Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass string. [1]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds. With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so. The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close. On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20 seconds!!! I'll stick with the Aquila. Rob -- References 1. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0 To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
An Aquila banjo string worked just right for the second string of my baroque lute. I was able to use the remainder of the strings on other instruments. Even if I only bought the pack for that one string, it was still cheaper than buying a single second string. It also had the advantage of being the only kind of "lute" string I could just pop into a retail store and purchase off the shelf anytime. Chris [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, May 1, 2016, 3:56 PM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com> wrote: I will most likely be corrected by the string specialists who know better, but it seems that the "shiny" nylgut strings live on in the form of Aqulia banjo strings. incidentally, they are on offer for quite a bit less than the cost of lute strings. RA From: [2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <[3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf of Matthew Daillie <[4]dail...@club-internet.fr> Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 6:16 PM To: Mimmo Peruffo; [5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut Dear Mimmo, Thanks for responding to my email. Would it be feasible for you to offer two types of nylgut, the present formula which many players seem happy with, and the shiny variety which I know I am not alone in thinking was your best production yet? As for synthetic loaded gut, I have had countless conversations with luthiers and lutenists hoping that you would soon get round to producing it, thus offering a new solution to the problem of finding satisfactory bass strings. I did not get to see any samples but those players and makers I have spoken to who did, were all very enthusiastic. Best, Matthew On 01/05/2016 15:21, Mimmo Peruffo wrote: > Hello guys > Mimmo here. > a few answers to the question: > > 1) the shiny smooth nylgut was done to have stronger nylgut strings > for the guges thinner of .46 mm. > Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the > slippering surfce. It was a pity because making them in this way > produce very strong strings. They go up in tune very fast also > The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they > are sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the extruder. > > 2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the > thinner gauges were too fragile. Right now I have not understand why. > Actually they are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but > after the rectification process they change and became less strong. > I tried a lot of solutions but with no good results. I agree that the > texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will > have time for them. Rigfht now I am going to finish my job with the > harp strings because there is a very urgent problem to solve in this > field. > In short: the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few years- > is very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a syntetic > that work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut is > not o: too bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that it > si not good at all. > > 3) loaded gut basses > it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is > still not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but > they do not admit this for obvious things. > HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to > produce very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the > past. This job is not fst because there are people and money involved. > > 4) what about the sintetic loaded strings? > I have all the know- how to produce the sintetic loded bass strings. > My problem is that I am very busy with the harps strings, as mentione > before. > Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen > when you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings. > I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some > prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel > almost) > timing? well, to be honest i think that the harp strings will take to > me 3 months almost. yes yes, I told this thing againg in the past but > in those times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation was. > In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is to > came with all these news on the table > Mimmo > > -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie > Sent: Sunday, Ma
[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
Dear Mimmo, Thanks for responding to my email. Would it be feasible for you to offer two types of nylgut, the present formula which many players seem happy with, and the shiny variety which I know I am not alone in thinking was your best production yet? As for synthetic loaded gut, I have had countless conversations with luthiers and lutenists hoping that you would soon get round to producing it, thus offering a new solution to the problem of finding satisfactory bass strings. I did not get to see any samples but those players and makers I have spoken to who did, were all very enthusiastic. Best, Matthew On 01/05/2016 15:21, Mimmo Peruffo wrote: Hello guys Mimmo here. a few answers to the question: 1) the shiny smooth nylgut was done to have stronger nylgut strings for the guges thinner of .46 mm. Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the slippering surfce. It was a pity because making them in this way produce very strong strings. They go up in tune very fast also The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they are sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the extruder. 2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the thinner gauges were too fragile. Right now I have not understand why. Actually they are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but after the rectification process they change and became less strong. I tried a lot of solutions but with no good results. I agree that the texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will have time for them. Rigfht now I am going to finish my job with the harp strings because there is a very urgent problem to solve in this field. In short: the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few years- is very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a syntetic that work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut is not o: too bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that it si not good at all. 3) loaded gut basses it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is still not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but they do not admit this for obvious things. HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to produce very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the past. This job is not fst because there are people and money involved. 4) what about the sintetic loaded strings? I have all the know- how to produce the sintetic loded bass strings. My problem is that I am very busy with the harps strings, as mentione before. Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen when you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings. I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel almost) timing? well, to be honest i think that the harp strings will take to me 3 months almost. yes yes, I told this thing againg in the past but in those times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation was. In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is to came with all these news on the table Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 12:25 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut Dear All, I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny, smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact) and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter, were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them. Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a 53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which led to ceased production). Any thoughts, comments? Thanks, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html - Aucun virus tr
[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
Hello guys Mimmo here. a few answers to the question: 1) the shiny smooth nylgut was done to have stronger nylgut strings for the guges thinner of .46 mm. Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the slippering surfce. It was a pity because making them in this way produce very strong strings. They go up in tune very fast also The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they are sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the extruder. 2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the thinner gauges were too fragile. Right now I have not understand why. Actually they are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but after the rectification process they change and became less strong. I tried a lot of solutions but with no good results. I agree that the texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will have time for them. Rigfht now I am going to finish my job with the harp strings because there is a very urgent problem to solve in this field. In short: the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few years- is very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a syntetic that work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut is not o: too bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that it si not good at all. 3) loaded gut basses it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is still not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but they do not admit this for obvious things. HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to produce very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the past. This job is not fst because there are people and money involved. 4) what about the sintetic loaded strings? I have all the know- how to produce the sintetic loded bass strings. My problem is that I am very busy with the harps strings, as mentione before. Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen when you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings. I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel almost) timing? well, to be honest i think that the harp strings will take to me 3 months almost. yes yes, I told this thing againg in the past but in those times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation was. In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is to came with all these news on the table Mimmo -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 12:25 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut Dear All, I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny, smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact) and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter, were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them. Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a 53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which led to ceased production). Any thoughts, comments? Thanks, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
Dear Matthew and All, I have some "shiny" nylgut which I bought only a year or so ago (from Bridgewood and Neitzert, and I doubt that their stock was particularly ancient). I hadn't noticed any big difference between these and other nylgut strings in terms of stability, stretchiness etc. For me, the rough surface of most nylgut is too much. If you listen carefully you can hear a high-pitched squeak, whereas a well-polished gut string is almost silent. On the other hand the very smooth surface of PVDF strings (the thin ones, not the big KF strings we've been discussing recently) is too slippery for a proper contact. The old white nylgut was too stretchy and often too rough on the surface. I used to polish them to make them a bit smoother. When the "new" (supposedly gut-coloured) nylgut came out it was claimed they were less stretchy (not true, according to my experiments) and to my dismay, were typically - but not always - even rougher on the surface! The "new" strings have always been less consistent than the old "white" strings, in stretchiness, in roughness, in trueness, and diameter (check with a micrometer). It may be my imagination, but they seem less stable in conditions of changing temperature as well, sometimes gut seems more stable! I have largely returned to gut and nylon (!) but it's incredibly frustrating not to have decent synthetic strings for everyday use. The only good news is that for basses, the Savarez KF strings have largely (but not completely) solved the problem which loaded gut was intended to address. Best wishes, Martin On 01/05/2016 12:25, Matthew Daillie wrote: Dear All, I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny, smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact) and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter, were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them. Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a 53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which led to ceased production). Any thoughts, comments? Thanks, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
Dear All, I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny, smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact) and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter, were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them. Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a 53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which led to ceased production). Any thoughts, comments? Thanks, Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Problems with new nylgut string on top course
Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch. I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well. I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it. So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before. Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings? Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
Dear Simon and Listers, I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps. Chris. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch.A I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well.A I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before.A Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings?A Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, A A Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
Hi Simon, I also went through 2 or 3 strings on my learning curve with nng. I had always used a .42mm gut or [old] n.g.* and tried the same with n.n.g. No go. I went to .39 and found satisfaction. You might have to go down to .37 or .38 Be sure the string doesn't wipe all the lubrication (if you're using it) out of the channel on the way up to pitch. I dab a bit more on the under half o the string for the last tone or two up to pitch. Gut will hold a bit more in its porous surface than synthetics. As I see it, gut and old n.g. don't mind the stretch (decreasing its diameter) quite as much as the nng. Nng is the smallest bit stiffer so doesn't fit through the channel quite as well. As you're tightening the peg you've got a lot more tension north of the nut and channel/lube issues work against you so the nut will be the weakest link. The problem with small synthetic diameters is that they go false a little quicker than larger diameters. Sean * 60cm going to G (A=440) On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch. I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well. I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it. So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before. Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings? Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on stage! Sean On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote: Dear Simon and Listers, I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps. Chris. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch.A I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well.A I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before.A Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings?A Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, A A Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
In my experience, the nng trebles are problemmatic. Firstly, I do not think the sound very good, and secondly, they snap and break, not anywhere as good sounding or durable as the old ones. My suggestion is to use nylon trebles. Nylon sounds better and is durable. Ed Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sean Smith lutesm...@mac.com wrote: Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on stage! Sean On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote: Dear Simon and Listers, I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps. Chris. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch.A I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well.A I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before.A Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings?A Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, A A Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
I'll agree with you, Ed, on the durability. Tuning to pitch got sorted out with the corrected diameter. As for sound it's a question of whether you're selling your soul to the devil in a contract signed with black ink or blue. Sean On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Edward Martin wrote: In my experience, the nng trebles are problemmatic. Firstly, I do not think the sound very good, and secondly, they snap and break, not anywhere as good sounding or durable as the old ones. My suggestion is to use nylon trebles. Nylon sounds better and is durable. Ed Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sean Smith lutesm...@mac.com wrote: Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on stage! Sean On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote: Dear Simon and Listers, I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps. Chris. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch.A I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well.A I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before.A Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings?A Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, A A Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course
Dear Simon, One has to be wary about the nomenclature for nylgut strings as Aquila change their formula without informing customers. The old white nylgut was replaced by the 'new' rather sickly yellow material a few years back. The 0.40 diameter strings were very problematic and would indeed snap without warning. I, too, tried every trick in the book to make sure the grooves on the nut of my lute were smooth before realising that the strings were the problem. There are now 'new new' nylgut strings available. They used only to exist in thick diameters and as long strings (NGE) but they are now available across the range. They are very shiny compared to the 'old new' nylgut and the thicker strings can be a pain to wind onto a peg because they are very stretchy. I have been sent a couple of samples but haven't tried them yet but I have been told by other players that they no longer break easily and that the sound is pretty convincing. The reference remains the same (NG). Best wishes Matthew On 4 sept. 2014, at 18:26, simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Dear Lutelisters, I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before coming up to pitch. I have tried three strings and they all have broken. Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted well. I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it. So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut. I know this subject has come up before. Someone suggested boiling the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the others. Could I have a bad batch of strings? Does anyone else have experience or advice? Thanks, Simon lambert -- Scanned by iCritical. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] new Nylgut strings
Sorry for starting a new thread, first of all, i have just joined the list so i can't reply to the original thread about nylgut strings. For all of you who don't know me, i'm the owner of Cuerdas Pulsadas ([1]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com) and we had this issue about 10 months ago (strings break as soon as they were tuned). Finally, Aquila Corde confirm us that there was a production problem in some batches and gauges until 0.50 were affected. They send us new and fixed strings and then we send the replacements to our customers . After that, all strings from Aquila came with a little stick on the envelope in wich you can check the batch details (month and year, for example). And, most important, the probleam dissapears. We don't have any complaint since then. So, keep in mind that it was a specific issue and that it's already fixed. Regards David Morales Cuerdas Pulsadas -- References 1. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/ To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems
Dear collected lute list wisdom, I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension. Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? TIA Ralf Mattes P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important rehearsal ... -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems
Dear Ralf, I had the same experience and snapped two .42's learning that New Nylgut won't always replace the old Nylgut of the same diameter (the second course did fine). My only difference being that my mensur is 60cm. I ordered .39 NNG and that solved it. I only use nng for the 1st course, 4th 8ve and occasionally for the 2nd course (and the rest gut) so don't have experience in using it elsewhere. My guess is that in winding the old .42 ng to tension it stretched enough to actually become .39 in diameter. Nng apparantly won't stretch that long in finer diameters. Or alternately, the abrupt bend as the string leaves bridge hole may be too much for the small diameter. Old/white ng does like its stretch: It's the only string I've found that, after about 7 months as a chanterelle, that goes flat in the upper frets --leading me to believe it loses a bit more diameter in the center of its length over time. After a year of using nng I have yet to observe any intonation problems. Those older nylguts would ocassionally be tricky. I sometimes had success by winding to a 4th below pitch and waiting a while, say, an hour and then winding to a 2nd below pitch and waiting again in the theory that it needs time to adjust internally and/or in the knots. It's certainly not as forgiving as a nylon chanterelle but neither does have the nylon's sound, thankfully. Btw, I have a lute buddy whose 63cm lute has a difficult time supporting gut to that pitch and uses a .39 (or less) old ng. You might have to go back to whatever had been successful. I hope this helps. Sean On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:36 AM, R. Mattes wrote: Dear collected lute list wisdom, I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension. Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? TIA Ralf Mattes P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important rehearsal ... -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems
I've had similar problems with my 67cm lute tuned to f' (440). The string lasted a few days then snapped - this happened a couple of times. I'm now using nylon for my first course. Bill From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36 Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems Dear collected lute list wisdom, I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension. Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? TIA Ralf Mattes P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important rehearsal ... -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems
Dear Ralf, I am mostly a gut user on my instruments, but I do have 2 instruments in synthetic strings. I am familiar with the problem you are describing. First of all, I think lutes sound their best when strung with the same pitch and tension you would use for gut. In other words, if you want to have a gut treble g at a=440, if you exceed 59 cm length, it will result in string breaking prematurely. This is when using gut... the same might be for nylgut. At 63 cm, it is too long of a mensur for gut, and it also may be too long for nylgut. I have never had problems with nylon trebles breaking at 63 cm at g. Also, nylgut stretches a lot, and the diameter actually becomes smaller as it stretches. This might be your problem. Could you use nylon trebles? I think this would solve your problem. Nylon is not as bright as gut or nylgut, but I think it is more sturdy than the nylgut trebles you are using; with nylon, you would be safe in not expecting string breakage. The other option would be to use carbon, but they sound very bright, in my opinion. For now, it seems your options are to play a semi-tone lower at a=415 (this might not be appropriate, if you are in ensembles tuned at 440) , or to use nylon or carbon. I hope this helps, ed At 08:36 AM 6/13/2013, R. Mattes wrote: Dear collected lute list wisdom, I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension. Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? TIA Ralf Mattes P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important rehearsal ... -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems
Dear all, I alredy posted the solution three months ago. Mimmo Peruffo suggests to dip the string(s) in boiling water for 20 seconds (it worked for me at least). Best wishes, Paolo Busato lute-maker www.busatolutes.com e-mail: paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com _ Il contenuto di questa e-mail e dei file allegati è RISERVATO e da considerarsi utilizzabile solamente dalla persona o dall'ente cui è indirizzato. Se avete ricevuto questa e-mail per errore, siete pregati di eliminarla e di contattare il mittente (Legge italiana 196/2003). The content of this e-mail and any files is CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email and any attachments and contact the sender. (Italian Law 196/2003) _ From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36 Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems Dear collected lute list wisdom, I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension. Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? TIA Ralf Mattes P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important rehearsal ... -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems
Would dipping well seasoned veteran NngA strings freshen them up? A I'm thinking of trying this but if it'd be more likely to kill them I think I'll pass On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Paolo Busato wrote: Dear all, I alredy posted the solution three months ago. Mimmo Peruffo suggests to dip the string(s) in boiling water for 20 seconds (it worked for me at least). Best wishes, Paolo Busato lute-maker [1]www.busatolutes.com e-mail: [2]paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com _ Il contenuto di questa e-mail e dei file allegati Ae RISERVATO e da considerarsi utilizzabile solamente dalla persona o dall'ente cui Ae indirizzato. Se avete ricevuto questa e-mail per errore, siete pregati di eliminarla e di contattare il mittente (Legge italiana 196/2003). A The content of this e-mail and any files is CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email and any attachments and contact the sender. (Italian Law 196/2003) _ A From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de A To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu A Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36 A Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems A Dear collected lute list wisdom, A I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from A all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top A strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full A tension. A Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely A the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still A feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the A bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken A top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut). A Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch? A TIA Ralf Mattes A P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important A rehearsal ... A -- A R. Mattes - A Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg A [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de A To get on or off this list see list information at A [2][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html A -- References A 1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de A 2. [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.busatolutes.com/ 2. http://paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com/ 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Nylgut Oud strings
Hi, A I'm interested in trying out Mimmo's Nylgut Oud strings on my Moroccan Oud.A Anyone has experience with them? I note that like all Oud string sets, the 3 rd string is wound.A I personally prefer a non-wound string on the 3rd course.A I currently use gut on my first 3 courses, any recommendation for Nylgut? A thx -- A Bruno Cognyl-Fournier A [1]www.estavel.org A -- References 1. http://www.estavel.org/ To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] New nylgut and KF basses
As an alternative to gut, I try new nylgut and basses Savarez KF on 5-6-7th courses, (for the basses, as Carlos Gonzales told us on the french lute list.) So the only wounded string left here is the 8th course bass (not used on this recording) I keep the old string, as it is now not to bright. Here for a try on two short pieces : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRmYvxgMMvg Val To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
Val- Thank you for sharing this with us; I have been very interested in the new nylgut, but last time I tried to purchase them, they were unavailable in the USA. First impression- I like the sound very much on all courses except the chanterelle- that one string sounds too bright, and out of character with all the rest. Your playing seems fine; comfortable, relaxed- full, but not pushing too hard. Maybe that lute wants a different string on the 1st course? The instrument for which I need the new nylgut is my Harris-Barber Chambure copy vihuela; it has a very rich but subdued sound (Compared to my lutes). Old white nylgut brings out its potential sound more aggressively than gut, but with enough richness and subtlety still part of the tone picture. However, the chanterelle seems to sing better with nylon. Comparing this instrument to your lute is probably inappropriate; an apples to oranges comparison- not only because it's vihuela vs. lute, but also mine has a doubled chanterelle. That one course was fabulous in gut, but for overall projection the instrument as a whole is better in the right synthetics- old Nylgut 2 - 4, KFG 5 6 w/ng octave on 6. Could you tell us your string length, string diameters tension, pitch standard? Thank you, Dan As an alternative to gut, I try new nylgut and basses Savarez KF on 5-6-7th courses, (for the basses, as Carlos Gonzales told us on the french lute list.) So the only wounded string left here is the 8th course bass (not used on this recording) I keep the old string, as it is now not to bright. Here for a try on two short pieces : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRmYvxgMMvg Val -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
One other obvious point I should have remembered; the recording process and what I hear on my computer may be distorting the true sound- maybe I'm all wrong about that 1st course- perhaps it must be heard in person. Too bad I can't pop over to your place anytime soon. I will be trying the NewNylgut on all courses if I ever get any. D -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
I think you're true about the chanterelle, I'll try another one later, this one its too thin I think. I'll give the references later in the evening (I'm busy preparing the meal now...) V. -Message d'origine- De : lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] De la part de Daniel Winheld Envoyé : jeudi 17 février 2011 17:20 À : Sauvage Valéry Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Objet : [LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses One other obvious point I should have remembered; the recording process and what I hear on my computer may be distorting the true sound- maybe I'm all wrong about that 1st course- perhaps it must be heard in person. Too bad I can't pop over to your place anytime soon. I will be trying the NewNylgut on all courses if I ever get any. D -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
-Message d'origine- Could you tell us your string length, string diameters tension, pitch standard? Thank you, Dan Here are the infos : Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm, A 440 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris. 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG next time) 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too big fot the bridge and peg holes ???) To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
Thanks for the info, I will compare it with the values usually used by lutenists here in Brazil and let you know about the possible deviations I may find! How do you like the sound of new nylgut compared to the old nylgut ? And compared to other strings? Thanks, Ernesto Em 17/02/2011, às 17:02, Sauvage Valéry escreveu: -Message d'origine- Could you tell us your string length, string diameters tension, pitch standard? Thank you, Dan Here are the infos : Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm, A 440 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris. 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG next time) 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too big fot the bridge and peg holes ???) To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
-Message d'origine- I didn't know that KF went thicker than about .85 or .90, at .95 and thicker I only have KFG (carbon fiber gut) which I use on the vihuela 5th 6th course, and diapasons on the archlute. Is your KF clear, or somewhat off-white, almost beige in color and cloudy? Have fun with the new strings. Dan 84 is clear, 116 and 127 are cloudy (usually used for harps, but very nice as bourdons on lutes !!!) I'll try .42 and .40 and will tell here ;-) Val To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
On instruments with bridge and peg holes too small for heavier gauge strings, Val, I've found it an easy procedure to enlarge them with a small hobby drill. A very small drill that can be turned with the fingers, and accepts various size drills. On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Sauvage Valéry wrote: -Message d'origine- Could you tell us your string length, string diameters tension, pitch standard? Thank you, Dan Here are the infos : Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm, A 440 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris. 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG next time) 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too big fot the bridge and peg holes ???) To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
You are probably talking about a pin vise, which is available from machinists supplies (and probably from Amazon.com). I've used an even simpler approach: wrap several turns of adhesive tape around the shaft of an appropriately sized drill. That's even skinnier than a pin vise and gives you enough grip to enlarge a bridge hole. Worked for me when I converted the basses on my Lundberg 8-course from wound strings to gimped gut. Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Mast Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:14 PM To: Sauvage Valéry Cc: 'Daniel Winheld'; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses On instruments with bridge and peg holes too small for heavier gauge strings, Val, I've found it an easy procedure to enlarge them with a small hobby drill. A very small drill that can be turned with the fingers, and accepts various size drills. On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Sauvage Valéry wrote: -Message d'origine- Could you tell us your string length, string diameters tension, pitch standard? Thank you, Dan Here are the infos : Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm, A 440 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris. 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG next time) 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too big fot the bridge and peg holes ???) To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses
-Message d'origine- How do you like the sound of new nylgut compared to the old nylgut ? And compared to other strings? Thanks, Ernesto I like better the new ones, I find it warmer and less noisy under the fingers. Warmer too compare to the KF I used before. A little bit brighter than gut for the first courses (as said on another post, I'll try thicker chanterelle later) I think it is a good compromise to gut, with un-wounded basses. I'm waiting for loaded nylgut basses Mimmo is experiencing now... V. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] loaded Nylgut
Hello to all guys, Two days ago I was able to do nylgut heavier So I made am little batch of strings just for some tests These samples are, at present, of graphite's grey colour ( due to the metallic powder I used to charge Nylgut); however I will do some changes in the colour. A few observations: 1) a 1,14 mm diameter string is equivalent to a 1.36 gut string. This mean that the loaded nylgut is virtually able to cover till the 6 course on renaissance lutes. Or on 6 7th fetted courses on long theorboes ( that often need wound strings). I tried the loaded nylgut like classical guitar 3rd with good results. I wonder how they work on the 13 till 14th long theorbo diapasons My job is not at the end: I still need to change some extruder's paramethers just to obtain the best performances. If things will work in the proper way maybe there is , soon, a new alternative to fluorocarbon and wound strings for the 4, 5 6th courses, lond diapasons etc. My best regards Mimmo Peruffo -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
my new nylgut arrived today. I ordered it last week from Mathias Wagner. It really looks like gut-strings. greetings w. Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:05:43 -0600 Von: Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com An: Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Betreff: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Curtis, at Aquila USA. I do not know if he has them in stock yet. Last time I heard from Curtis, he was still awaiting delivery from Italy. Remember, it often takes more than a month for mailing something from Italy. At least, that is my experience (when Mimmo mails something from Italy, it takes it a long time for the package to get out of Italy - sometimes a month - when it gets out of Italy, it arrives soon). ed At 11:10 AM 12/19/2010, Daniel Winheld wrote: Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear Mark They are available here in Europe, I saw quite a good stock at Wolfgang Frueh's when I got several strings; but Mimmo apparently sold all his stock at the Greenwich festival. He was making up new stock, but I don't know whether any had been sent out to the US prior to this. I don't know how fast synthetic string making can be? It has to be extruded (which should be quick), but then perhaps also semi-rectified. I don't know whether all this is automated, or partly by hand; but I did hear that two machines were out of order, recently which slowed production down. Then of course the strings must be packaged, posted etc. Aquila is not a huge company, perhaps 30 or so people involved in the NG side of things (I would guess); but possibly somethings have to be done by Mimmo himself. Certianly all the chemical research and testing will have had to be done by Mimmo himself. $ It is normal practice to have a few people test prototype strings (usually the same people), and I imagine there may have been feedback and slight changes, before the strings were deemed ready for sale to the wider public; when further sets of strings may have again been sent out to verifiy probable reactions. Sometimes, production goes no further than these initial tests. $ I remember when Dan Larson was attempting to make tungsten gimped strings only a few lutenists had the chance to try them, I believe there were even a few gold wire ones. I assume production was finally thought to be too expensive, as I believe reactions were quite positive to the sound of those strings. $ I feel sure things will quickly become as it was with the old NG. It is not really surprising if there is a slight stutter as things swing into motion. $ Regards Anthony __ De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will receive a shipment of NNGs. Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have generously reported their virtues. Thank you, Ed and David. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Thank you so much about your help Anthony. This morning I made 100 Kg almost of the Nw Nylgut strings with the extruder machine. Yesterday I made the NGE type. Now we need to rectify them ( 5-6 days almost of work) and package them, that is quite a tedious operation Please give me a bit of time more; I hope to be able to send such strings to distributors just after Cristamas. I amm working to do a good stock so all will be happy. Mimmo ginal Message - From: [1]Anthony Hind To: [2]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:47 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Dear Mark They are available here in Europe, I saw quite a good stock at Wolfgang Frueh's when I got several strings; but Mimmo apparently sold all his stock at the Greenwich festival. He was making up new stock, but I don't know whether any had been sent out to the US prior to this. I don't know how fast synthetic string making can be? It has to be extruded (which should be quick), but then perhaps also semi-rectified. I don't know whether all this is automated, or partly by hand; but I did hear that two machines were out of order, recently which slowed production down. Then of course the strings must be packaged, posted etc. Aquila is not a huge company, perhaps 30 or so people involved in the NG side of things (I would guess); but possibly somethings have to be done by Mimmo himself. Certianly all the chemical research and testing will have had to be done by Mimmo himself. $ It is normal practice to have a few people test prototype strings (usually the same people), and I imagine there may have been feedback and slight changes, before the strings were deemed ready for sale to the wider public; when further sets of strings may have again been sent out to verifiy probable reactions. Sometimes, production goes no further than these initial tests. $ I remember when Dan Larson was attempting to make tungsten gimped strings only a few lutenists had the chance to try them, I believe there were even a few gold wire ones. I assume production was finally thought to be too expensive, as I believe reactions were quite positive to the sound of those strings. $ I feel sure things will quickly become as it was with the old NG. It is not really surprising if there is a slight stutter as things swing into motion. $ Regards Anthony __ De : [3]gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com [4]gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com A : Anthony Hind [5]agno3ph...@yahoo.com; [6]dwinh...@comcast.net Cc : [7]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will receive a shipment of NNGs. Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have generously reported their virtues. Thank you, Ed and David. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Mark I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a 200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris. Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously. Regards Anthony __ De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will receive a shipment of NNGs. Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have generously reported their virtues. Thank you, Ed and David. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1][2][3]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg0 2195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear Anthony, I need to apologize for not identifying you initially as one of the worthy great ones who should have these strings first, and am glad to hear you obtained at least some of them. There are genuine advantages to living in the civilized world instead of the provinces. Have you ever tried fish gut from Damian Dlugolecki in Oregon?--he advised me not to get his strings for some reason, perhaps because he prefers dealing with early bowed instrument players. Thank you for your most welcome message. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Mark I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a 200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris. Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously. Regards Anthony __ De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will receive a shipment of NNGs. Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have generously reported their virtues. Thank you, Ed and David. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear Dan and Ed Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either the silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped, I dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of those (or perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied with lesser strings). $ Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at one time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys (as Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works quite so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all discussed, are harmonically very different. $ I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic (almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either. $ Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably go for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly higher tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make more loaded strings. These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the other at Wolfgang's). They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global tension of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most; and that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is right. Thanks again, Anthony __ De : Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Anthony, I don't know if this would be of any use to you, but I have found one (and only this one!) type of close-wound overspun string to sound acceptable on my Baroque lute- and it is the one with SOLID silver, not silver plated wire. Until I can get the new loaded strings for my lute, I will continue to use the solid silver overspun classical guitar D (4th) string for the 11-C, and the (bass rider) 12-B/B-flat. For the 13-A I use a solid silver bass viola da gamba string, most likely a 5-G. These are all old strings, and although the viol string has a gut core vs. the nylon floss guitar string core, it must be the solid silver making them sound virtually identical; and they transition acceptably from the Savarez KFG 10-D, especially played in context, and paired with the right octave string, which helps mask the change. I would imagine that a classical guitar A-5 might substitute for a 200c loaded. Or the right viol string, probably a 5-G like mine. As far as I know, only E. O. Mari ever made the solid silver wound guitar strings, and I don't know if they still do. Viol strings ought to be easy to find, however. The ends do take some labor intensive modification to go through bridge and peg holes, viols being set up so differently. Just a last resort possibility. Dan I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a 200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris. Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously. Regards Anthony -- -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
A few years ago, I saw one of the gold gimped strings. It was beautiful. I have not asked Dan Larson about them for years, but I can imagine that now the cost would be absolutely prohibitive. But now he uses Sterling silver with the gut, and I can tell the difference as compared to copper gimped... they do sound clearer and warmer. I have never had problems in the past, with mixing various kinds of gut basses. If the string vibrates truly and is the proper tension, I do not notice all that much difference in the sound, if one has a good gut octave. I think a person listening could probably not tell the difference in sound, but the performer perhaps can. ed At 04:29 PM 12/20/2010, Anthony Hind wrote: Dear Dan and Ed Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either the silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped, I dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of those (or perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied with lesser strings). $ Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at one time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys (as Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works quite so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all discussed, are harmonically very different. $ I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic (almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either. $ Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably go for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly higher tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make more loaded strings. These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the other at Wolfgang's). They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global tension of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most; and that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is right. Thanks again, Anthony __ De : Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle Anthony, I don't know if this would be of any use to you, but I have found one (and only this one!) type of close-wound overspun string to sound acceptable on my Baroque lute- and it is the one with SOLID silver, not silver plated wire. Until I can get the new loaded strings for my lute, I will continue to use the solid silver overspun classical guitar D (4th) string for the 11-C, and the (bass rider) 12-B/B-flat. For the 13-A I use a solid silver bass viola da gamba string, most likely a 5-G. These are all old strings, and although the viol string has a gut core vs. the nylon floss guitar string core, it must be the solid silver making them sound virtually identical; and they transition acceptably from the Savarez KFG 10-D, especially played in context, and paired with the right octave string, which helps mask the change. I would imagine that a classical guitar A-5 might substitute for a 200c loaded. Or the right viol string, probably a 5-G like mine. As far as I know, only E. O. Mari ever made the solid silver wound guitar strings, and I don't know if they still do. Viol strings ought to be easy to find, however. The ends do take some labor intensive modification to go through bridge and peg holes, viols being set up so differently. Just a last resort possibility. Dan I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a 200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris. Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously. Regards Anthony -- -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
At first, I had a copper Gimped on 7c of my Baroque lute, between a loaded Venice 8c and a 6c Venice. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Gimped string in itself, but to me close to the lute, it sounded brighter than the surrounding strings (perhaps a silver or a gold gimped might have been less so?). $ Indeed, as you know, I have very much enjoyed your recording of the Conradi with a strong presence of Gimped strings, which gave an excellent sound. However, loaded Venice have a very dark if warm sound, in spite of their good harmonic behaviour; and I think they contrast more with gimped than perhaps the first generation did. In deed, I would not advise a loaded Venice between two gimped strings, either. $ In relation to this, I have tended to use stronger octaves (than basses) to brighten (and lighten) the loaded bass sound, slightly. I really do think that works extremely well (like you do I believe?). $ You are probably correct in thinking that a single string would not be noticeable to a listener. It would give some of its characteristics to its neighbouring strings, which makes it harder to hear. I may have become hyper-sensitive to these slight tonal breaks. Although I think most all-gut users prefer all gut just because they want to maximise homogeneity of sound: I think this does remain important to us for most 11c Baroque music (perhaps, a little less so with later German Baroque?). Avoiding tonal breaks (which ever string types we use) is therefore perhaps just an extension of this. Regards Anthony PS Thanks for drawing my attention to the Nigel North Weiss recording. It is superb, never mind what strings he is using. $ __ De : Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net; e...@gamutstrings.com Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 23h 42min 17s Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle A few years ago, I saw one of the gold gimped strings. It was beautiful. I have not asked Dan Larson about them for years, but I can imagine that now the cost would be absolutely prohibitive. But now he uses Sterling silver with the gut, and I can tell the difference as compared to copper gimped... they do sound clearer and warmer. I have never had problems in the past, with mixing various kinds of gut basses. If the string vibrates truly and is the proper tension, I do not notice all that much difference in the sound, if one has a good gut octave. I think a person listening could probably not tell the difference in sound, but the performer perhaps can. ed At 04:29 PM 12/20/2010, Anthony Hind wrote: Dear Dan and Ed Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either the silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped, I dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of those (or perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied with lesser strings). $ Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at one time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys (as Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works quite so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all discussed, are harmonically very different. $ I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic (almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either. $ Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably go for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly higher tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make more loaded strings. These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the other at Wolfgang's). They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global tension of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most; and that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is right. Thanks again, Anthony __ De : Daniel Winheld [1]dwinh...@comcast.net A : Anthony Hind [2]agno3ph...@yahoo.com Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
[LUTE] New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles. This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower gut Aquila trebles. $ I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a slightly duller sound. $ The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top string; and I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong clear sound. Now I wonder whether it would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut or Baldock lower trebles? $ I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to be patient. It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut. $ I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes). However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top string. Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal than the old one did. This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will evidently vary from player to player. $ In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge, to come quite close to his ideal strong gut treble, in accordance with his historical string theory set out on his web pages: it is clear, strong
[LUTE] New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles. This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower gut Aquila trebles. $ I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a slightly duller sound. $ The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top string; and I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong clear sound. Now I wonder whether it would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut or Baldock lower trebles? $ I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to be patient. It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut. $ I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes). However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top string. Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal than the old one did. This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will evidently vary from player to player. $ In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge, to come quite close to his ideal strong gut treble, in accordance with his historical string theory set out on his web pages: it is clear, strong
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles. This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower gut Aquila trebles. $ I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a slightly duller sound. $ The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top string; and I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong clear sound. Now I wonder whether it would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut or Baldock lower trebles? $ I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to be patient. It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this new string does stabilise quicker than the Old
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Curtis, at Aquila USA. I do not know if he has them in stock yet. Last time I heard from Curtis, he was still awaiting delivery from Italy. Remember, it often takes more than a month for mailing something from Italy. At least, that is my experience (when Mimmo mails something from Italy, it takes it a long time for the package to get out of Italy - sometimes a month - when it gets out of Italy, it arrives soon). ed At 11:10 AM 12/19/2010, Daniel Winheld wrote: Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1][2]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles. This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower gut Aquila trebles. $ I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was true
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
407 is such a good pitch for lute. At 08:33 AM 12/19/2010, you wrote: Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles. This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower gut Aquila trebles. $ I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a slightly duller sound. $ The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top string; and I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong clear sound. Now I wonder whether it would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut or Baldock lower trebles? $ I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to be patient. It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut. $ I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes). However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top string. Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal than the old one did. This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will evidently vary from player to player. $ In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
I wonder whether the D'Addario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? Purple Haze? If that is a special Jimi Hendrix Classical guitar string, it seems like fusion gone totally amok. No, this D'Addario string is just rectified nylon, which gives the illusion of being more harmonically true; seeming to have less extraneous noise, or perhaps less of the feeling of musical deadness that I can't escape sensing from nylon strings, on even the best lutes. It is still essentially a cold sound, wrong color: ... tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like,) -Perfect description of nylon vs. the 2nd course gut on my lute. But the brightness of the overall sound makes this tolerable- for now- to my ears. Sometimes one puts up with a marginally acceptable sound until cumulative annoyance makes them suddenly intolerable. I would like to get some of the new Nylgut before this event occurs. Dan Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. The US distributor seems to be [1]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
407 is such a good pitch for lute. Don't be so darn cheap. Cough up another ¢2 and you can have 409, which is even better. Getting close to winter solstice- watch out for seasonal affective disorder and wandering frets. -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will receive a shipment of NNGs. Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have generously reported their virtues. Thank you, Ed and David. Mark Seifert Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Dan I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite the same conclusions as I did. $ I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever you are used to, possibly). $ The NNG go down to 1.04, I think. $ The US distributor seems to be [1]http://www.aquilausa.com/ but I don't know whether they will have the new string. $ Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris Anthony $ $ Daniel Winheld Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we just call them NNG?) - chanterelles for my new workhorse Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 4th course possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm. For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like the D'Addarios. Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America? Thanks, Dan Dear luthenists Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them that way, while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice octaves. $ I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz. $ I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut, and of course Sofracob). $ However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like). $ When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported, [1][2]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h tml my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a meter's distance. $ I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out, and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with synthetics), a little ball had formed without splitting the string as sometimes happens with gut. $ The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in. I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much with the 42NG on the 60cm lute. However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut). $ I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle on in the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the older lower gut trebles
[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: New Nylgut strings
2010/12/9 Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com As you probably know, I advocate gut. But, for nylgut lovers, this is a new, improved version. It seems to me the new Emperor's clothes have the colour of gut. ;-) David To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: New Nylgut strings
Great. As you probably know, I advocate gut. But, for nylgut lovers, this is a new, improved version. ed At 07:29 AM 12/9/2010, Nicolás Valencia wrote: Dear Ed, Thanks for your detailed report. It looks like Aquila has improved a lot their strings. I've seen they're commercially available at Le point d'accroche. I'll order my own set right away! Regards, Nicolás -Mensaje original- De: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] En nombre de Edward Martin Enviado el: miércoles, 08 de diciembre de 2010 21:29 Para: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; l...@cs.dartmouth.edu CC: aqu...@aquilacorde.com Asunto: [BAROQUE-LUTE] New Nylgut strings Dear ones, I announced last night that I received a new set of nylgut for my 13-course baroque lute. I did put them on yesterday, and I let them set overnight. I already reported that the new color is very good, and the feel is very good, as well. Now that I can tune the new strings, I can give a report, after the first day: 1. The stretching seems to be less than old nylgut, and this is a very, very good thing, because as you know, the larger strings take so long to settle in. 2. The feel is very good, as they tend to have a slightly greater roughness to the feel, which makes for a better sound, in my opinion. 3. The sound: They are louder, much louder than the old nylgut strings, in my opinion. But, the sound is slightly more pleasant than the old strings, and that is another improvement. 4. On the set I have, the intonation is very good, especially on the upper frets in the midrange strings. All in all, after one day, I think they are superior to old nylgut. That is my opinion. ed Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute
[BAROQUE-LUTE] New Nylgut strings
Dear ones, I announced last night that I received a new set of nylgut for my 13-course baroque lute. I did put them on yesterday, and I let them set overnight. I already reported that the new color is very good, and the feel is very good, as well. Now that I can tune the new strings, I can give a report, after the first day: 1. The stretching seems to be less than old nylgut, and this is a very, very good thing, because as you know, the larger strings take so long to settle in. 2. The feel is very good, as they tend to have a slightly greater roughness to the feel, which makes for a better sound, in my opinion. 3. The sound: They are louder, much louder than the old nylgut strings, in my opinion. But, the sound is slightly more pleasant than the old strings, and that is another improvement. 4. On the set I have, the intonation is very good, especially on the upper frets in the midrange strings. All in all, after one day, I think they are superior to old nylgut. That is my opinion. ed Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html