[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Leonard Williams
   While string quaity has been an issue for me (using gut),  another
   factor to consider may be the location of the break:  my strings tend
   to wear and fray either at the point of plucking or somewhere near the
   most used frets (2nd and 3rd).  This has often enough been due to
   rough, calloused skin in cold weather; or inattention to nail care.

   Leonard Williams
   -Original Message-
   From: Dan Winheld <dwinh...@lmi.net>
   To: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com>; LuteNet list
   <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Mon, Feb 19, 2018 11:54 am
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
   Wim-
   No clue as to cause of the breakage until you supply essential
   information:
   1. String length- nut to bridge?
   2. A= ? 440, 415, 465, 392 - other?
   While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st
   generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent
   tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but
   still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics.
   First thing in any case, get a good magnifier and check the nut and
   bridge for any irregularities that could snag the string, any rough
   spots that could abrade the string, A sharp "V" shape groove, too
   deeply
   cut in the nut is a fine way to jam a string as you fruitlessly try to
   wind it up to pitch. Take care of that stuff first, then assess the
   other factors.
   Dan
   On 2/18/2018 11:27 PM, Wim Loos wrote:
   > Dear luteplayers,
   > Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a
   > 7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What
   do
   > you suggest as an alternative.
   > Wim Loos
   >
   > --
   >
   >
   > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Matthew Daillie

On 19/02/2018 17:53, Dan Winheld wrote:
While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st 
generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent 
tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but 
still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics. 


Unfortunately one cannot classify nylgut simply as 'White' or 'yellow 
New' as there have been numerous incarnations of both (the later white 
stuff was actually pretty good, more satisfactory to my mind than some 
of the strings produced recently).


Best,

Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Dan Winheld

Wim-

No clue as to cause of the breakage until you supply essential information:

1. String length- nut to bridge?
2. A= ? 440, 415, 465, 392 - other?

While stronger than equivalent gut, nylgut (especially the 1st 
generation, dead white stuff) is much more delicate than equivalent 
tension nylon or KF. The later, more yellow New Nylgut is stronger but 
still nowhere near as tough as the other synthetics.


First thing in any case, get a good magnifier and check the nut and 
bridge for any irregularities that could snag the string, any rough 
spots that could abrade the string, A sharp "V" shape groove, too deeply 
cut in the nut is a fine way to jam a string as you fruitlessly try to 
wind it up to pitch. Take care of that stuff first, then assess the 
other factors.


Dan

On 2/18/2018 11:27 PM, Wim Loos wrote:

Dear luteplayers,
Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a
7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do
you suggest as an alternative.
Wim Loos

--


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Mimmo - Aquila Corde Armoniche
The problem of breackage of the thinner Nylgut strings was caused by some inner 
 extruder parameters. The extrusion thecnology  is very complex, so the 
problemi s not just related to the common knowledges in matter of breaking 
index etc . On this fyeld I am learning everyday something of new.
I would like to say that I have fixed this problem a few months ago, around the 
2017 summer.   Always I had breakages on my renaissance lute of 61 cms tuned in 
G. This intrumentis my tester because there is no rider on the 1st string than 
can give an help. They are 5 months that it it tuned in A without any problem. 
 After a couple of months I have asked to our  early music distribitors and,  
since now, the problem of breakages drastically dropped.
Just to inform you guys.
Mimmo

-Messaggio originale-
Da: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Per conto di 
Matthew Daillie
Inviato: lunedì 19 febbraio 2018 11:39
A: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com>; LuteNet list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Oggetto: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

I was presuming a pitch of 440 but Wim mentions neither pitch nor string length.



> On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:22, Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@cs.dartmouth.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415



To get on or off this list see list information at 
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Matthew Daillie
I was presuming a pitch of 440 but Wim mentions neither pitch nor string length.



> On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:22, Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@cs.dartmouth.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Dear Wim,
   Since it is the stress (ie Tension p.u.cross sectional Area) on the
   string which causes it to break (at the 'Breaking Stress'), the
   critical factors for a particular string material are simply pitch and
   string length.  Despite continuing mythology, absolute thickness is not
   relevant (provided there are no significant irregularities in the
   string material) - a thicker string will simply need a greater force
   (ie Tension) to reach the breaking stress than a thinner. The stress
   will be the same on the thick string as on the thinner.
   A nylgut string of 0.44 on a lute of 60cmm string length at A415
   (giving a theoretical tension of around 3,9Kg) should below the
   breaking stress of nylgut - provided the formulation hasn't changed
   again (as Matthew points out) or there was a dud batch.
   I say 'theoretical' tension since slender strings thin significantly on
   stretching so the 'at pitch' diameter will be less than the unstressed
   diameter..
   Why don't you contact Mimmo for his view?
   regards,
   Martyn
 __

   From: Matthew Daillie <dail...@club-internet.fr>
   To: Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com>
   Cc: LuteNet list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Monday, 19 February 2018, 9:37
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string
   You didn't mention the string length of your lute so we can't judge
   whether 0.44 is the right diameter or not (it would certainly be far
   too much for a 60 cm lute and would explain the snapping strings).
   Unfortunately breakage is a common problem with the current Nylgut top
   strings, particularly the 0.40 gauges. There best stuff was the shiny
   nylgut made in 2014 (apart from the first batch which was dodgy) but as
   apparently some players complained about the fact that it was smooth
   and didn't have any surface texture (??!!) they stopped producing it
   for lutes.
   You could try La Bella or Kürschner nylon. Some players also like
   carbon strings but I find them too thin for top courses.
   Good quality gut is obviously very satisfactory sonically but you would
   be extremely lucky to find any for a chanterelle that lasts more than a
   couple of days of intensive playing.
   There is at least one string maker using silk (an interesting, historic
   alternative) but I have no experience of that and I don't know whether
   he makes gauges suitable for chanterelles.
   Best,
   Matthew
   > On Feb 19, 2018, at 8:27, Wim Loos <[1]wjglso...@gmail.com> wrote:
   >
   >  Dear luteplayers,
   >  Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on
   a
   >  7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What
   do
   >  you suggest as an alternative.
   >  Wim Loos
   >
   >  --
   >
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:wjglso...@gmail.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-19 Thread Matthew Daillie
You didn't mention the string length of your lute so we can't judge whether 
0.44 is the right diameter or not (it would certainly be far too much for a 60 
cm lute and would explain the snapping strings).

Unfortunately breakage is a common problem with the current Nylgut top strings, 
particularly the 0.40 gauges. There best stuff was the shiny nylgut made in 
2014 (apart from the first batch which was dodgy) but as apparently some 
players complained about the fact that it was smooth and didn't have any 
surface texture (??!!) they stopped producing it for lutes.

You could try La Bella or Kürschner nylon. Some players also like carbon 
strings but I find them too thin for top courses.

Good quality gut is obviously very satisfactory sonically but you would be 
extremely lucky to find any for a chanterelle that lasts more than a couple of 
days of intensive playing.

There is at least one string maker using silk (an interesting, historic 
alternative) but I have no experience of that and I don't know whether he makes 
gauges suitable for chanterelles.

Best,

Matthew



> On Feb 19, 2018, at 8:27, Wim Loos <wjglso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>   Dear luteplayers,
>   Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a
>   7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do
>   you suggest as an alternative.
>   Wim Loos
> 
>   --
> 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Broeken nylgut string

2018-02-18 Thread Wim Loos
   Dear luteplayers,
   Within a relative short periode, two times my g' (0.44mm nylgut) on a
   7-c Renaissance lute has broken. Sounds this familliar to you? What do
   you suggest as an alternative.
   Wim Loos

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] 'Shiny' nylgut

2018-02-09 Thread Matthew Daillie
Does anyone have any of the small diameter shiny nylgut strings that 
Aquila produced in 2014 that they would be willing to sell? I am 
particularly interested in 0.38 and 0.44 gauge strings to put on my lute 
in a'.


Please contact me off-list. Many thanks.

Best,

Matthew




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-10 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
   ah! right
   thanks Jan. see you at Paris in April?
   Takin beer togheter
   Mimmo

   From: [1]jmpoirier2
   Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:31 AM
   To: [2]Mimmo Peruffo ; [3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Subject: RE : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

   Dear Mimmo,
   No problem at all about the duration of sound with your strings. I
   agree with Bruno Cognyl-Fournier : we are all very grateful -  or we
   should be -  for your brilliant a d continuous efforts to improve the
   quality of synthetic strings and the discussion about Mersenne and all
   that is only a way to satisfy our scholarly egos 😉!  But please keep up
   the good work and thank you again for everything you do to help us
   pluckers to improve our performances of early music!

   Best wishes da Francia,

   Jean-Marie


    Message d'origine 
   De : Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com>
   Date : 09/01/2017 6:33 PM (GMT+01:00)
   À : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Objet : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
  maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations:
  yes, I am out of stock  due to some problems: the first one is that
   the
  plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is
   common
  when one exstrude plastics.  I worked hard  to understand  why in
   these
  15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The
  extruder broke the gear pump!  heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday)  I
  was in condition to find another way  that is working pretty good
  but... my co-worker at the extruder  right now  has flu!  another
  stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone.
   their
  lifetime?  I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do
   not
  last 20 seconds
  From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
  Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM
  To: [2]Dan Winheld
  Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob
  MacKillop ; [7]Lute List
  Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
  and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
  Bruno
  2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>:
Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may
   be
emerging as an obtainable, affordable,  predictable, and PRACTICAL
reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work
   over
all these years.
Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now  available in
   the
U.S?
Thank you all-
To get on or off this list see list information at
[9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  --
   References
  1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
  2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
  3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
  5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
  6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
  7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
  9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
   2. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
   3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-10 Thread jmpoirier2
   Dear Mimmo,

   No problem at all about the duration of sound with your strings. I
   agree with Bruno Cognyl-Fournier : we are all very grateful -  or we
   should be -  for your brilliant a d continuous efforts to improve the
   quality of synthetic strings and the discussion about Mersenne and all
   that is only a way to satisfy our scholarly egos 😉!  But please keep up
   the good work and thank you again for everything you do to help us
   pluckers to improve our performances of early music!

   Best wishes da Francia,

   Jean-Marie

    Message d'origine 
   De : Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com>
   Date : 09/01/2017 6:33 PM (GMT+01:00)
   À : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Objet : [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
  maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations:
  yes, I am out of stock  due to some problems: the first one is that
   the
  plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is
   common
  when one exstrude plastics.  I worked hard  to understand  why in
   these
  15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The
  extruder broke the gear pump!  heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday)  I
  was in condition to find another way  that is working pretty good
  but... my co-worker at the extruder  right now  has flu!  another
  stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone.
   their
  lifetime?  I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do
   not
  last 20 seconds
  From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
  Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM
  To: [2]Dan Winheld
  Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob
  MacKillop ; [7]Lute List
  Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
  and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
  Bruno
  2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>:
Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may
   be
emerging as an obtainable, affordable,  predictable, and PRACTICAL
reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work
   over
all these years.
Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now  available in
   the
U.S?
Thank you all-
To get on or off this list see list information at
[9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  --
   References
  1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
  2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
  3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
  5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
  6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
  7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
  9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread John Mardinly
   Huh? Folks, sound and vibration are one and the same. If the string can
   be seen to be vibrating and you can't hear it, it is either a problem
   with your hearing (which to be sure comes naturally with our advancing
   age), or there is sufficient ambient noise in the room or other notes
   being played that the sound is overwhelmed. You can be sure, that if
   the string is vibrating, there IS sound, whether your ears/brain sense
   it or not. The attenuation of the vibration follows a mathematical
   formula (exponential decay) that is related to internal damping and
   parasitic loss (which is energy transferred from the string to the body
   of the instrument). Attempting to ascribe a single time duration number
   to the sustain is an absurdity that violates the laws of physics. You
   can use a single number to approach some convenient threshold, say for
   example 75% attenuation (time to 75% reduction in volume), but 100%
   attenuation is something you would never be able to determine with any
   useful accuracy. Rob's video shows that it seems relatively easy to
   ‘qualitatively' assess the difference in sustain, but to put numbers on
   it, you would need to decide on some terminating threshold, and realize
   that the string is still vibrating and there is still sound beyond that
   terminating threshold.


   A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
   Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer
   EMail: [1]john.mardi...@asu.edu
   Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs)
   But don't call the lab….I won't be there!

   On Jan 9, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Jean-Marie Poirier
   <[3]jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

   Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a
   precise observer and his observations are worth considering seriously.
   When he describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a
   lute, he takes care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth
   est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une
   minute...", the sound is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And
   a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se
   meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there
   is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after the ear has
   lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at all
   !
   Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which
   the test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly
   influence the parameters of the experience...
   Best,
   Jean-Marie
   --

 I am lucky: I have  seen /installed strings on some hundreds od
 lutes in
 these last years.  Maybe I can be in mistake, but  I have never seen
 a lute,
 whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose
 sustain
 is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have
 in
 absolute the higher density) .
 I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a
 positive
 experience in matter.  At present I would stick that Mersenne  meant
  how
 many time last  the vibration, not the sound.
 Mimmo
 -Messaggio originale-
 From: Matthew Daillie
 Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM
 To: Mimmo Peruffo
 Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List
 Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
 One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in
 sustain
 from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show
 just
 how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on
 the edge
 of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe
 those 20
 seconds are not so unrealistic.
 Best,
 Matthew=
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [4]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmo
 uth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIFaQ=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGq
 yv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-L
 NEQ=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOl
 SP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo=

References

   1. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu
   2. tel:408-921-3253
   3. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
   4. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIFaQ=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOlSP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo=



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Dan Winheld
   "...and my guess is that these strings may last forever.."
   While no doubt true, and good thing as well, ALL unfingered lute bass
   strings last virtually forever! My Baroque lute student has had the
   original (and unspeakably vile) metal overspun strings on his otherwise
   very fine 13 course lute for at least 10 years now; only his 7th course
   is starting to become tolerable from the occasionally fingered A-flat
   and B-flat. I do my part keeping string builders and merchants afloat
   because of my perceived need for new & improved strings, and/or radical
   re-evaluations of tension/sonority/pitch considerations.
   Thanks to all for answering my little shopping questions- but as they
   are flying off the shelves so fast, I may have to wait awhile; at least
   until Mimmo gets the bugs out of the factory. Can't stand it when I can
   only get some a set to fill out a particular range.
   Onwards!
   Dan
   On 1/9/2017 9:02 AM, Bruno Cognyl-Fournier wrote:

   and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
   Bruno

   2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[1]dwinh...@lmi.net>:

 Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
 lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be
 emerging as an obtainable, affordable,  predictable, and PRACTICAL
 reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over
 all these years.
 Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now  available in the
 U.S?
 Thank you all-
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
   Dear Mimmo
   Don,t worry, I think we all appreciate your efforts, and are all
   excited about the new strings.   Yes it has started another debate on
   strings and sound quality, vibration , resonnance, etc.. what it boils
   down to however , is what kind of sound pleases each of us
   individually.   I for one have never been satisfied with wound strings,
   except the gut core wound strings from Savarez. and then again in my
   taste.. only when the strings are old and have been on the instrument
   for a long time... I am eager to receive my order from Cuerdas Pulsadas
   ( I sent you a private message about my order with you).   Certainly
   with your new CD strings, it gives us yet another choice.
   thank you again
   Bruno

   2017-01-09 12:33 GMT-05:00 Mimmo Peruffo <[1]mperu...@aquilacorde.com>:

maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations:
yes, I am out of stock   due to some problems: the first one is
 that the
plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is
 common
when one exstrude plastics.   I worked hard   to understand   why
 in these
15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The
extruder broke the gear pump!   heck. Just yesterday (yes,
 Sunday)   I
was in condition to find another way   that is working pretty
 good
but... my co-worker at the extruder   right now   has flu!
 another
stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone.
 their
lifetime?   I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound
 do not
last 20 seconds
From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM
To: [2]Dan Winheld
Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ;
 [6]Rob
MacKillop ; [7]Lute List
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
Bruno
2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8][2]dwinh...@lmi.net>:
  Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in
 the
  lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings
 may be
  emerging as an obtainable, affordable,   predictable, and
 PRACTICAL
  reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work
 over
  all these years.
  Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now   available
 in the
  U.S?
  Thank you all-
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  [9][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
 References
1. mailto:[4]fournier...@gmail.com
2. mailto:[5]dwinh...@lmi.net
3. mailto:[6]agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu
4. mailto:[7]dail...@club-internet.fr
5. mailto:[8]mperu...@aquilacorde.com
6. mailto:[9]robmackil...@gmail.com
7. mailto:[10]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
8. mailto:[11]dwinh...@lmi.net
9. [12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
   2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   4. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
   5. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   6. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
   8. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
   9. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
  10. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
  12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
   maybe it is better to give you guys a few more informations:
   yes, I am out of stock  due to some problems: the first one is that the
   plastic blend nd copper powder changes some behaviours. This is common
   when one exstrude plastics.  I worked hard  to understand  why in these
   15 days and then when I was able to realize why, guess that? The
   extruder broke the gear pump!  heck. Just yesterday (yes, Sunday)  I
   was in condition to find another way  that is working pretty good
   but... my co-worker at the extruder  right now  has flu!  another
   stopah ah. Do not worry: tomorrow I will do this job alone. their
   lifetime?  I think that they last forever. I am sorry, the sound do not
   last 20 seconds


   From: [1]Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
   Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 6:02 PM
   To: [2]Dan Winheld
   Cc: [3]Anthony Hind ; [4]Matthew Daillie ; [5]Mimmo Peruffo ; [6]Rob
   MacKillop ; [7]Lute List
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

   and my guess is that these strings may last forever..

   Bruno

   2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[8]dwinh...@lmi.net>:

 Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
 lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be
 emerging as an obtainable, affordable,  predictable, and PRACTICAL
 reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over
 all these years.
 Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now  available in the
 U.S?
 Thank you all-
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


   --

References

   1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
   2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   3. mailto:agno3ph...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
   5. mailto:mperu...@aquilacorde.com
   6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   8. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread David Morales
   Dear all,
   We have some gauges still on stock, but they are running fast. You can
   also find everything on our store with 20% discount, so it's really a
   nice chance to try them.
   This is the website: [1]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com
   Mimmo is already part of the lute history, I dont have any doubt on
   that!
   Regards.

   2017-01-09 17:56 GMT+01:00 Dan Winheld <[2]dwinh...@lmi.net>:

 Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
 lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be
 emerging as an obtainable, affordable,   predictable, and PRACTICAL
 reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over
 all these years.
 Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now   available in the
 U.S?
 Thank you all-
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Cuerdas Pulsadas
   [4]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [5]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   [6]BLOG || [7]AGENDA || [8]TIMELINE

   [9]blog [10]facebook [11]twitter [12]instagram

   --

References

   1. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
   2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   4. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
   5. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   6. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog
   7. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/
   8. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline
   9. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog
  10. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  11. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  12. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
   David Morales' cuerdas Pulsadas in Spain, has them, David Morales who
   is on this lute list should be able to help you out.   Mimmo is out of
   stock already.
   Bruno

   2017-01-09 12:02 GMT-05:00 Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
   <[1]fournier...@gmail.com>:

   and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
   Bruno

   2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[2]dwinh...@lmi.net>:

 Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
 lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be
 emerging as an obtainable, affordable,   predictable, and PRACTICAL
 reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over
 all these years.
 Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now   available in the
 U.S?
 Thank you all-
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
   2. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
   and my guess is that these strings may last forever..
   Bruno

   2017-01-09 11:56 GMT-05:00 Dan Winheld <[1]dwinh...@lmi.net>:

 Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the
 lute "business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be
 emerging as an obtainable, affordable,   predictable, and PRACTICAL
 reality. Mimmo Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over
 all these years.
 Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now   available in the
 U.S?
 Thank you all-
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Dan Winheld
Fascinating thread! I am delighted that after over 40 years in the lute 
"business" (even mostly amateur) that good bass strings may be emerging 
as an obtainable, affordable,  predictable, and PRACTICAL reality. Mimmo 
Peruffo is to be congratulated for all his work over all these years.


Now, can anyone tell me if the new basses are now  available in the U.S?

Thank you all-



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Anthony Hind
   Jakob Lindberg's remarks about the wonderful sustain of his old
   Rauwolf seems to confirm what you say (sustain, complexity and clarity,
   together according to JL). Mersenne would certainly have heard
   marvellous old Bologna lutes sought out by French luthenists, no doubt
   exactly for these qualities (rather than as antiques), but for all
   strings surely, not just for bass sustain or prominence.
   If the French revelled in bass sustain, which one might gather from
   Mersenne, wouldn't they have adopted demi-file, or kept on using the
   extended 12C lute? Yet, I seem to remember a quotation of the Burwell
   author, saying the French shunned the 12C lute exactly because of its
   bass course prominence and nazality.
   At least for this repertoire I have always imagined that a homogenous
   sustain through all strings is best, and that is what Mimmo's  new
   basses do seem to give us. They have good sustain but on my lute at
   least, their low impedance allow the Means and Trebles to shine
   through.
   Regards
   Anthony

   Le 9 janv. 2017 à 10:52, Matthew Daillie <[1]dail...@club-internet.fr>
   a écrit :

   One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in
   sustain from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to
   show just how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a
   lute on the edge of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time,
   then maybe those 20 seconds are not so unrealistic.
   Best,
   Matthew
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:dail...@club-internet.fr
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
I understand... this is the point: we scholars have done a long list of 
conceptual and practical mistakes done by Mersenne in his book.
This mean that  he must be taken with a grain of salt.  Of course, he done a 
great job with his monumental treatise and it is very usefull also.


I  am a strict follower of Galileo Galilei's thinking: any affermation 
should be verified by pratical tests made by us.
Well, I done these tests.  with a gut roped loaded string we are in order of 
a few seconds,  we are very far form a third of minutes mentioned by him.

it is a bit more with modern wound strings ( 10 seconds, or around it)

Now, why -a 5 time dense than gut- nylon wound string should have less 
sustain than an all gut string whose density is  a lot less? This is against 
the phisics laws, not to our personal opinions. Mine too.

-
Maybe those strings were so well done to justify a lot of things: but they 
cannot be done so good to be better than  any modern wound string.  This 
because the sustain is relate to elasticity and density.

Ciao!
Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Jean-Marie Poirier

Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:42 AM
To: Mimmo Peruffo ; Matthew Daillie
Cc: Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List'
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a precise 
observer and his observations are worth considering seriously. When he 
describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a lute, he takes 
care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de 
l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute...", the sound 
is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And a few lines further he 
says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se meut encore long-temps après 
que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there is no doubt that the strings still 
moves a long time after the ear has lost its sound. So he is not confusing 
vibration and sound, not at all !
Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which the 
test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly influence 
the parameters of the experience...


Best,

Jean-Marie


--


I am lucky: I have  seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in
these last years.  Maybe I can be in mistake, but  I have never seen a 
lute,

whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose  sustain
is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in
absolute the higher density) .
I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive
experience in matter.  At present I would stick that Mersenne  meant  how
many time last  the vibration, not the sound.
Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Matthew Daillie

Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Mimmo Peruffo
Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain
from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just
how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge
of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20
seconds are not so unrealistic.
Best,
Matthew=



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 





[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a precise 
observer and his observations are worth considering seriously. When he 
describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a lute, he takes care 
to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille 
durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute...", the sound is preceived 
by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a 
nul doute que la chorde se meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd 
le son..." = there is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after 
the ear has lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at 
all !
Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which the test 
was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly influence the 
parameters of the experience...

Best,

Jean-Marie


--
 
>I am lucky: I have  seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in 
>these last years.  Maybe I can be in mistake, but  I have never seen a lute, 
>whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose  sustain 
>is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in 
>absolute the higher density) .
>I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive 
>experience in matter.  At present I would stick that Mersenne  meant  how 
>many time last  the vibration, not the sound.
>Mimmo
>
>-Messaggio originale- 
>From: Matthew Daillie
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM
>To: Mimmo Peruffo
>Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List
>Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
>
>One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain 
>from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just 
>how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge 
>of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 
>seconds are not so unrealistic.
>Best,
>Matthew= 
>
>
>
>To get on or off this list see list information at
>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
I am lucky: I have  seen /installed strings on some hundreds od lutes in 
these last years.  Maybe I can be in mistake, but  I have never seen a lute, 
whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose  sustain 
is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have in 
absolute the higher density) .
I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a positive 
experience in matter.  At present I would stick that Mersenne  meant  how 
many time last  the vibration, not the sound.

Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Matthew Daillie

Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Mimmo Peruffo
Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain 
from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just 
how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge 
of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 
seconds are not so unrealistic.

Best,
Matthew= 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Matthew Daillie
Differences in string length can obviously also account for considerable 
variations in sustain.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Matthew Daillie
One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in sustain 
from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show just how 
good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on the edge of a 
wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe those 20 seconds 
are not so unrealistic.
Best,
Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Mimmo Peruffo

Sorry to the list
it was a private message to Rop, I sent it also to the list for mistake
Mimmo



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-09 Thread Mimmo Peruffo

thanks Rob
at present I have some troubles with the extruder plant. I do not know why 
but i am not able to do a new stock
I hope to solve the problem soon. In ther meantime two gearpumps broken. 
Heck!
This job is crazy,  plastics are crazy: the change their behaviours over 
night!

Ciao
Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Rob MacKillop

Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 8:49 AM
To: Mimmo Peruffo
Cc: Lute List
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

Good comments, Mimmo. I must say I am impressed with the Loaded Nylgut 
strings, and will definitely use them on from 6th to 13th courses. 
Congratulations on creating a very good string.


Rob




On 9 Jan 2017, at 07:24, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> wrote:

Well,  a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with 
modern wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut:  i remember that 
the modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings 
types. Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the 
ticker.
In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning 
gut: the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 
while it should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire 
calculations, the equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc.  One thing 
is to consider  20 second of sound and another thing is that the vibration 
of the string lasted till 20 seconds.  I am thinking that it is the second 
case; i.e. the vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound.  So 
one can hear the sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration 
of the string till its stop.

I think that this is the only interpretetation  that can work.
In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very 
very efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this 
behaviour.

Mimmo


-Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM
To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List'
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

The exact quotation from Mersenne is :
"...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la 
sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que 
l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt 
fois..."
which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a 
Lute is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a 
minute, that is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without 
emotion, beats ten, or twenty times..."


Amicalement,

Jean-Marie



--


 Hi Rob,

 What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
 Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.

 Chris
 [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
 <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:

   Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
   Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
   string.
   [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
 the
   Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
   With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
   you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
   The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
 completely
   strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
   On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
   seconds!!!
   I'll stick with the Aquila.
   Rob
   --
 References
   1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

 --

References

 1. https://yho.com/footer0
 2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html







[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
Good comments, Mimmo. I must say I am impressed with the Loaded Nylgut strings, 
and will definitely use them on from 6th to 13th courses. Congratulations on 
creating a very good string. 

Rob



> On 9 Jan 2017, at 07:24, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> wrote:
> 
> Well,  a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with modern 
> wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut:  i remember that the 
> modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings types. 
> Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the ticker.
> In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning gut: 
> the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 while it 
> should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire calculations, the 
> equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc.  One thing is to consider  20 
> second of sound and another thing is that the vibration of the string lasted 
> till 20 seconds.  I am thinking that it is the second case; i.e. the 
> vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound.  So one can hear the 
> sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration of the string till 
> its stop.
> I think that this is the only interpretetation  that can work.
> In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very very 
> efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this 
> behaviour.
> Mimmo
> 
> 
> -Messaggio originale- From: Jean-Marie Poirier
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM
> To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List'
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
> 
> The exact quotation from Mersenne is :
> "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la 
> sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère 
> du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..."
> which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute 
> is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that 
> is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, 
> or twenty times..."
> 
> Amicalement,
> 
> Jean-Marie
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
>>  Hi Rob,
>> 
>>  What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
>>  Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.
>> 
>>  Chris
>>  [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>> 
>>  On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
>>  <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
>>Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
>>string.
>>[1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
>>  the
>>Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
>>With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
>>you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
>>The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
>>  completely
>>strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
>>On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
>>seconds!!!
>>I'll stick with the Aquila.
>>Rob
>>--
>>  References
>>1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  To get on or off this list see list information at
>>  [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>>  --
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>  1. https://yho.com/footer0
>>  2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 




[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
Well,  a sustain of 20 seconds or so on is very impossible even with modern 
wound strings, whose density is 5 times plain gut:  i remember that the 
modern wound strings has the best gain over all the bass strings types. 
Mersenne wrote that he is mentioning the last bass string; i.e. the ticker.
In the Harmonie Universelle there are a lot of mistakes. One concerning gut: 
the Mersenne's calculation give a breacking stress of 19 Kg/ mm2 while it 
should be of 34 Kg/mm2 almost. And so on with metal wire calculations, the 
equal tension on harps and spinette etc etc.  One thing is to consider  20 
second of sound and another thing is that the vibration of the string 
lasted till 20 seconds.  I am thinking that it is the second case; i.e. the 
vibration of the string whas so long, not the sound.  So one can hear the 
sound in the first seconds and then one see the vibration of the string till 
its stop.

I think that this is the only interpretetation  that can work.
In any case, generally speacking, this mean that these basses were very very 
efficients. The elasticity only is not in condition the explain this 
behaviour.

Mimmo


-Messaggio originale- 
From: Jean-Marie Poirier

Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:46 PM
To: Christopher Wilke ; Rob MacKillop ; 'Lute List'
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

The exact quotation from Mersenne is :
"...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la 
sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère 
du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..."
which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute 
is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that 
is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, 
or twenty times..."


Amicalement,

Jean-Marie



--


  Hi Rob,

  What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
  Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.

  Chris
  [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

  On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
  <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:

Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
string.
[1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
  the
Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
  completely
strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
seconds!!!
I'll stick with the Aquila.
Rob
--
  References
1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

  1. https://yho.com/footer0
  2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread howard posner
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Rob MacKillop  wrote:
> 
>   Good point, Howard. But still, twenty seconds is a long time. I am
>   certainly only interested in the time before clashing with the next
>   note or notes takes place, and that of course depends on the passage of
>   music. But generally speaking, even if we halve Mersenne's twenty
>   seconds, that is still much longer than even the Savarez string.

And what do we make of Mersenne’s range of ten to twenty seconds/heartbeats?  
What’s he actually telling us?  Some strings ten, others twenty?  Useable 
sustain ten, total duration twenty?  Results for one string were inconsistent?  
Depends on your heart rate?  I’m sure we can up with a bunch of plausible 
interpretations, but in the end the information seems too uncertain to base any 
solid conclusion on it.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
   Good point, Howard. But still, twenty seconds is a long time. I am
   certainly only interested in the time before clashing with the next
   note or notes takes place, and that of course depends on the passage of
   music. But generally speaking, even if we halve Mersenne's twenty
   seconds, that is still much longer than even the Savarez string.

   On 8 January 2017 at 22:26, howard posner <[1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
   wrote:

 > On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Rob MacKillop
 <[2]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >
 > So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade
 has been to minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely
 on board with this. But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we
 have been moving in the wrong direction - we should be at least
 doubling the sustain time.
 Could it be that you and Mersenne are talking about different
 things?   You wrote about "useable sustain," which I take to mean
 "how long the note is musically significant or can interfere with
 new notes," or something similar.   Mersenne sounds more like he's
 reporting results of an experiment like the one I just did: pluck
 the string in a quiet room and time how long you can hear it at all,
 which yields a very different number.   Indeed, my total sustain
 time just now was more than double what I would call "useable
 sustain."
 Mersenne was primarily a scientist/mathematician (do a web search on
 him and you'll turn up all sorts of things about prime numbers), so
 we need to be alert to the possibility that he's giving us
 scientific data rather than practical musical information.

   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   2. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread howard posner

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Rob MacKillop  wrote:
> 
> So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade has been to 
> minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely on board with this. 
> But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we have been moving in the 
> wrong direction - we should be at least doubling the sustain time. 

Could it be that you and Mersenne are talking about different things?  You 
wrote about “useable sustain,” which I take to mean “how long the note is 
musically significant or can interfere with new notes,” or something similar.  
Mersenne sounds more like he’s reporting results of an experiment like the one 
I just did: pluck the string in a quiet room and time how long you can hear it 
at all, which yields a very different number.  Indeed, my total sustain time 
just now was more than double what I would call “useable sustain.”

Mersenne was primarily a scientist/mathematician (do a web search on him and 
you’ll turn up all sorts of things about prime numbers), so we need to be alert 
to the possibility that he’s giving us scientific data rather than practical 
musical information. 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Matthew Daillie
   On 08/01/2017 21:29, howard posner wrote:

On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Rob MacKillop [1] wrote:

  Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French...

Google Translate renders "le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de Tor
eille durant la sixiesme partie,  ou le tiers d'vne minutec'est à dire pendant 
q
ue Tartere du poux d'un homme sain"

as

"The sound of the large strings of Luth is seen from the ear during the sixth pa
rt, or the third of a minute is to be said while the tartar of the lice of a hea
lthy man"

I don't know you can improve on that.

   Top notch! Who needs translators?
   --

References

   1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Matthew Daillie

On 08/01/2017 21:46, Jean-Marie Poirier wrote:

The exact quotation from Mersenne is :
"...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme 
partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du poux d'un homme sain, 
& sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..."
which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is 
perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to say 
as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or twenty 
times..."

Amicalement,

Jean-Marie


'sans emotion' means in a relaxed state



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
So what are we to make of this? The movement in the last decade has been to 
minimise the sustain as long as possible. I'm completely on board with this. 
But if we are to take Mersenne at face value, we have been moving in the wrong 
direction - we should be at least doubling the sustain time. 

Confused of Edinburgh...



> On 8 Jan 2017, at 20:46, Jean-Marie Poirier <jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> 
> The exact quotation from Mersenne is : 
> "...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la 
> sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère 
> du poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..."
> which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute 
> is perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that 
> is to say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, 
> or twenty times..."
> 
> Amicalement,
> 
> Jean-Marie
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
>>  Hi Rob,
>> 
>>  What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
>>  Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.
>> 
>>  Chris
>>  [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>> 
>>  On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
>>  <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
>>Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
>>string.
>>[1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
>>  the
>>Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
>>With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
>>you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
>>The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
>>  completely
>>strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
>>On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
>>seconds!!!
>>I'll stick with the Aquila.
>>Rob
>>--
>>  References
>>1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  To get on or off this list see list information at
>>  [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>>  --
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>  1. https://yho.com/footer0
>>  2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>>  4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
> 




[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Matthew Daillie
   On 08/01/2017 20:58, Christopher Wilke wrote:

Thanks!
   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 2:33 PM, David Morales
   [1] wrote:

 Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic
 in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings.
 Check it out here:

   [1][2][2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-
   by-
 aquila-corde/

   There are some mistakes in the transcription of the excerpt in a modern
   font (part of which is highlighted), it is best to read the scan of the
   original.

   Best

   Matthew
   --

References

   1. mailto:dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   2. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
The exact quotation from Mersenne is : 
"...le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de l'oreille durant la 
sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une minute, c'est à dire pendant que l'artère du 
poux d'un homme sain, & sans emotion bat dix, ou vingt fois..."
which can be roughly translated by : the sound of the big strings of a Lute is 
perceived by the ear during the sixth part, or a third of a minute, that is to 
say as long as the pulse of a healthy man, without emotion, beats ten, or 
twenty times..."

Amicalement,

Jean-Marie



--
 
>   Hi Rob,
>
>   What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
>   Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.
>
>   Chris
>   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
>   <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
> Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
> string.
> [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
> My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
>   the
> Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
> With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
> you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
> The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
>   completely
> strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
> On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
> seconds!!!
> I'll stick with the Aquila.
> Rob
> --
>   References
> 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>   To get on or off this list see list information at
>   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>   --
>
>References
>
>   1. https://yho.com/footer0
>   2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>   3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
>   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>




[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Christopher Wilke
   Thanks!
   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 2:33 PM, David Morales
   <dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com> wrote:

 Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic
 in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings.
 Check it out here:

   [1][2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-
   by-
 aquila-corde/
 Copied here:
 --
 Let's take a look at [2]Harmonie universelle, contenant la thà ©orie
   et
 la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in
 Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his
 lifetime (available [3]at gallica).
 Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass
   strings:
   * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons
 existent dauantage à  raison de leur gayetà © qui vient de la
 promptitude de leurs
 movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les  airs que l'on jouà ©
 sur le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour
 l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans .
   * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand
 auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut
 tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, Ã ´c que le son des
   grosses
 chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme
   partie,
 ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du
 poux d'vn homme sain, à ´c Ãà ns à ©motion bat dix, ou vingt
   fois: de
 sorte qu'il ne reste qu'Ã  remarquer combien de fois la chorde
   bat
 Tair dans vne seconde minute, pour sà §auoir combien elle le
   frappe
 auant que de se repose
 Regards.
 2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop
   <[4][3]robmackil...@gmail.com>:
   I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart
   beats,
   if I
   remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original.
   Rob
   On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke
   <[1][5][4]chriswi...@yahoo.com>
   wrote:
   Hi Rob,
   What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second
   sustain?
   Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to
   no
   avail.
   Chris
   [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
   <[3][6][5]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new
   Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk
   core
   bass
 string.
 [1][4][7][6]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable
   sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8
   seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much
   every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very
   close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for
   almost
   20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1. [5][8][7]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [6][9][8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --
   References
   1. mailto:[10][9]chriswi...@yahoo.com
   2. [11][10]https://yho.com/footer0
   3. mailto:[12][11]robmackil...@gmail.com
   4. [13][12]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   5. [14][13]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   6.
   [15][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 --
 Cuerdas Pulsadas
 [16]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [17][15]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
 [18]BLOG || [19]AGENDA || [20]TIMELINE
 [21]blog [22]facebook [23]twitter [24]instagram
 --
   References
 1.
   [16]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by
   -aquila-corde/
 2. [17]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle
 3. [18]http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR
 4. mailto:[19]robmackil...@gmail.com
 5. mailto:[20]chriswi...@yahoo.com
 6. mailto:[21]robmackil...@gmail.com
 7. [22]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 8. [23]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 9. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 10. mailto:[25]chriswi...@yahoo.com
 11. [26]https://yho.com/foote

[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread howard posner

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Rob MacKillop  wrote:
> 
>   Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French...

Google Translate renders "le son des grosses chordes de Luth est apperceu de 
Toreille durant la sixiesme partie,  ou le tiers d'vne minutec'est à dire 
pendant que Tartere du poux d'un homme sain”

as 

"The sound of the large strings of Luth is seen from the ear during the sixth 
part, or the third of a minute is to be said while the tartar of the lice of a 
healthy man”

I don’t know you can improve on that.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
   Excellent. I'd appreciate a good translation of the French...

   Rob

   On 8 Jan 2017, at 19:33, David Morales
   <[1]dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com> wrote:

   Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic
   in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings.
   Check it out here:
   [2]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-
   aquila-corde/
   Copied here:
   --

   Let's take a look at [3]Harmonie universelle, contenant la théorie et
   la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in
   Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his
   lifetime (available [4]at gallica).

   Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass strings:
 * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons
   existent dauantage à raison de leur gayeté qui vient de la
   promptitude de leurs
   movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les  airs que l'on joué sur
   le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour
   l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans .

 * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand
   auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut
   tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, ôc que le son des grosses
   chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie,
   ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du poux
   d'vn homme sain, ôc íàns émotion bat dix, ou vingt fois: de sorte
   qu'il ne reste qu'à remarquer combien de fois la chorde bat Tair
   dans vne seconde minute, pour sçauoir combien elle le frappe auant
   que de se repose

   Regards.
   2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[5]robmackil...@gmail.com>:

I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats,
 if I
remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original.
Rob
On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke
 <[1][6]chriswi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Hi Rob,
What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second
 sustain?
Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no
 avail.
Chris
[2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
<[3][7]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
  Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new
     Aquila
  Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core
 bass
  string.
  [1][4][8]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable
 sustain on
the
  Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8
 seconds.
  With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much
 every note
  you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
  The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
completely
  strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very
 close.
  On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost
 20
  seconds!!!
  I'll stick with the Aquila.
  Rob
  --
References
  1. [5][9]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
To get on or off this list see list information at
[6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
 References
1. mailto:[11]chriswi...@yahoo.com
2. [12]https://yho.com/footer0
3. mailto:[13]robmackil...@gmail.com
4. [14]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
5. [15]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
6. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Cuerdas Pulsadas
   [17]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [18]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   [19]BLOG || [20]AGENDA || [21]TIMELINE

   [22]blog [23]facebook [24]twitter [25]instagram

   --

References

   1. mailto:dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   2. 
http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-aquila-corde/
   3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle
   4. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR
   5. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   6. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
   7. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   8. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   9. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  11. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
  12. https://yho.com/footer0
  13. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
  14. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  15. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  17. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
  18. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
  19. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog
  20. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/
  21. http://

[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread David Morales
   Yes, we have some quotes and images on our blog related to that topic
   in the interview with M. Peruffo regarding these loaded strings.
   Check it out here:
   [1]http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-
   aquila-corde/
   Copied here:
   --

   Let's take a look at [2]Harmonie universelle, contenant la théorie et
   la pratique de la musique, written by Marin Mersenne and published in
   Paris in 1636. It represented the sum of musical knowledge during his
   lifetime (available [3]at gallica).

   Here, Mersenne give us some clues about the sound of the bass strings:
 * D'abondant l'on experimente que les airs des Balets & des Violons
   existent dauantage à raison de leur gayeté qui vient de la
   promptitude de leurs
   movements, ou de leurs sons aigus, que les   airs que l'on joué
   sur le Luth, ou sur les basses de Violes, lesquels sont pour
   l'ordinaire plus graves & plus languissans .

 * Quant au nombre des retours de chaque chorde, il est tres-grand
   auant qu'elle se repose, car il est certain qu elle sc meut
   tousiours tandis que Ton en oyt le son, ôc que le son des grosses
   chordes de Luth est apperceu de Toreille durant la sixiesme partie,
   ou le tiers d'vne minute , c'est à dire pendant que Tartere du
   poux d'vn homme sain, ôc Ãà ns émotion bat dix, ou vingt fois: de
   sorte qu'il ne reste qu'Ã  remarquer combien de fois la chorde bat
   Tair dans vne seconde minute, pour sçauoir combien elle le frappe
   auant que de se repose

   Regards.

   2017-01-08 20:23 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[4]robmackil...@gmail.com>:

I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats,
 if I
remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original.
Rob
On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke
 <[1][5]chriswi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Hi Rob,
What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second
 sustain?
Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no
 avail.
Chris
[2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
<[3][6]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:
  Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new
     Aquila
  Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core
 bass
  string.
  [1][4][7]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable
 sustain on
the
  Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8
 seconds.
  With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much
 every note
  you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
  The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
completely
  strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very
 close.
  On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost
 20
  seconds!!!
  I'll stick with the Aquila.
  Rob
  --
References
  1. [5][8]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
To get on or off this list see list information at
[6][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
 References
1. mailto:[10]chriswi...@yahoo.com
2. [11]https://yho.com/footer0
3. mailto:[12]robmackil...@gmail.com
4. [13]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
5. [14]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
6. [15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Cuerdas Pulsadas
   [16]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [17]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   [18]BLOG || [19]AGENDA || [20]TIMELINE

   [21]blog [22]facebook [23]twitter [24]instagram

   --

References

   1. 
http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/new-loaded-synthetic-bass-strings-by-aquila-corde/
   2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_universelle
   3. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5471093v.r=.langFR
   4. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   5. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
   6. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   7. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   8. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  10. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
  11. https://yho.com/footer0
  12. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
  13. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  14. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
  15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  16. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
  17. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
  18. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog
  19. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/
  20. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline
  21. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog
  22. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  23. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  24. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
   I was being lazy. He doesn't mention seconds, rather heart beats, if I
   remember correctly. Hopefully someone can supply the original.

   Rob

   On 8 Jan 2017, at 18:54, Christopher Wilke <[1]chriswi...@yahoo.com>
   wrote:

   Hi Rob,
   What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
   Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.
   Chris
   [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
   <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
 string.
 [1][4]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1. [5]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
   2. https://yho.com/footer0
   3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   4. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   5. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Christopher Wilke
   Hi Rob,

   What exactly is the quote in Mersenne about the 20 second sustain?
   Although my French is very poor, I've attempted to find it to no avail.

   Chris
   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

   On Sunday, January 8, 2017, 10:59 AM, Rob MacKillop
   <robmackil...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
 string.
 [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. https://yho.com/footer0
   2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Anthony Hind
   Oups, sorry Rob for sending to wrong list AH

Very relevant comparison Rob, and I also notice that on my 11C
   lute, the sustain of the new Aquila basses is almost identical to that
   of my Venice octaves (which presumably would not be the case with the
   Savarez. I imagine they would drone on longer if not stopped); but
   again if I pluck courses D10 and d2 together, they also have the same
   sustain. I think this shows how well the new basses work together with
   the other strings, rather than against them, as with wirewounds.
   I also find that they are fairly close to my Venice loaded basses
   (rather than the stiffer first generation HT loaded), but with better
   resonance patterns, and even more elasticity. I did have to alter my
   playing slightly to allow for this. Those coming from stiffer
   wirewounds may have more adapting to do, but will probably find this
   worthwhile; yet these very elastic basses may not work quite so well
   for low tension players, who could have adapted their technique to
   stiffer pure gut (HT or roped), Gimped, or even KF harp strings. It
   might be interesting to hear from players coming from different playing
   styles.
   Best regards
   Anthony

 Le 8 janv. 2017 à 16:59, Rob MacKillop <[1]robmackil...@gmail.com> a
 écrit :

   Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new
 Aquila
   Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core
 bass
   string.
   [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain
 on the
   Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
   With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every
 note
   you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
   The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
 completely
   strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very
 close.
   On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
   seconds!!!
   I'll stick with the Aquila.
   Rob
   --
 References
   1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Anthony Hind
   Very relevant comparison Rob, and I also notice that on my 11C lute,
   the sustain of the new Aquila basses is almost identical to that of my
   Venice octaves (which presumably would not be the case with the
   Savarez. I imagine they would drone on longer if not stopped); but
   again if I pluck courses D10 and d2 together, they also have the same
   sustain. I think this shows how well the new basses work together with
   the other strings, rather than against them, as with wirewounds.
   I also find that they are fairly close to my Venice loaded basses
   (rather than the stiffer first generation HT loaded), but with better
   resonance patterns, and even more elasticity. I did have to alter my
   playing slightly to allow for this. Those coming from stiffer
   wirewounds may have more adapting to do, but will probably find this
   worthwhile; yet these very elastic basses may not work quite so well
   for low tension players, who could have adapted their technique to
   stiffer pure gut (HT or roped), Gimped, or even KF harp strings. It
   might be interesting to hear from players coming from different playing
   styles.
   Best regards
   Anthony

   Le 8 janv. 2017 à 16:59, Rob MacKillop <[1]robmackil...@gmail.com> a
   écrit :

 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
 string.
 [1][2]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1. [3]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   2. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   3. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
   The complete opposite for me, John :-) At least we have a choice now. I
   don't want to spend half my time stopping every bass note from ringing
   on too long.

   Rob
   [1]www.robmackillop.net

   On 8 Jan 2017, at 17:59, John Mardinly <[2]john.mardi...@asu.edu>
   wrote:

 No contest-I use and love the Savarez (on my 8-course) not just
 because of the sustain, but they pick up the vibrations from the
 treble strings and give an ethereal sound to the instrument. It's
 like having your own cathedral at home without the expense.

   A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
   Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer
   EMail: [3]john.mardi...@asu.edu
   Cell: [4]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs)
   But don't call the lab….I won't be there!

   On Jan 8, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[5]robmackil...@gmail.com>
   wrote:

 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
 string.
 [1][6]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8
   FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=M
   AuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxg
   s2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1.
   [7]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk
   -5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvn
   WTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r40
   18W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [8]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth
   .edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Eji
   z41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKG
   b8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vG
   Anwva6IfQbx-rWM=

   --

References

   1. http://www.robmackillop.net/
   2. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu
   3. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu
   4. tel:408-921-3253
   5. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   6. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   7. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   8. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vGAnwva6IfQbx-rWM=



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread John Mardinly
   No contest-I use and love the Savarez (on my 8-course) not just because
   of the sustain, but they pick up the vibrations from the treble strings
   and give an ethereal sound to the instrument. It's like having your own
   cathedral at home without the expense.

   A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
   Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer
   EMail: [1]john.mardi...@asu.edu
   Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs)
   But don't call the lab….I won't be there!

   On Jan 8, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Rob MacKillop <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com>
   wrote:

 Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
 Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
 string.
 [1][4]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8
   FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=M
   AuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxg
   s2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
 My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on
   the
 Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
 With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
 you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
 The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
   completely
 strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
 On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
 seconds!!!
 I'll stick with the Aquila.
 Rob
 --
   References
 1.
   [5]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk
   -5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvn
   WTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r40
   18W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [6]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth
   .edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Eji
   z41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKG
   b8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vG
   Anwva6IfQbx-rWM=

References

   1. mailto:john.mardi...@asu.edu
   2. tel:408-921-3253
   3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   4. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   5. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_8FVJMk-5FXjv0=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=vK-hlBzsEByZNXDC5i5LH-YYypqOI8SeRkGnBq_bAco=
   6. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DQIBAg=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ=NKGb8KFtR8fCEKGtEBxMo1-yxgs2r4018W6q7RfkDRM=0XK1Wa-RCG8wfXXk9ngP0lxby6vGAnwva6IfQbx-rWM=



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread David Morales
   Thanks for sharing Rob, this is really helpful.
   I have also uploaded a short video yesterday, trying out these new
   synthetic loaded bass strings on a vihuela.
   [1]https://youtu.be/g1g7sZiknws
   By the way, let me share with you that these days we are offering a 20%
   discount on all strings available on Cuerdas Pulsadas, include these
   new loaded strings.
   [2]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com
   Best regards

   2017-01-08 16:59 GMT+01:00 Rob MacKillop <[3]robmackil...@gmail.com>:

Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new
 Aquila
Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core
 bass
string.
[1][4]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain
 on the
Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8
 seconds.
With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every
 note
you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c
 completely
strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very
 close.
On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost
 20
seconds!!!
I'll stick with the Aquila.
Rob
--
 References
1. [5]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Cuerdas Pulsadas
   [7]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com || [8]h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   [9]BLOG || [10]AGENDA || [11]TIMELINE

   [12]blog [13]facebook [14]twitter [15]instagram

   --

References

   1. https://youtu.be/g1g7sZiknws
   2. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
   3. mailto:robmackil...@gmail.com
   4. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   5. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/
   8. mailto:h...@cuerdaspulsadas.com
   9. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog
  10. http://cuerdaspulsadas.es/blog/agenda/
  11. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/timeline
  12. http://.cuerdaspulsadas.com/blog
  13. http://www.facebook.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  14. http://www.twitter.com/cuerdaspulsadas
  15. http://www.instagram.com/cuerdaspulsadas



[LUTE] Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain

2017-01-08 Thread Rob MacKillop
   Here's a very short video comparing the sustain time of a new Aquila
   Loaded Nylgut string and a Savarez copper-wound nylon-silk core bass
   string.
   [1]https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0
   My ears hear better than the microphone, and the useable sustain on the
   Aquila string is 4 seconds, while the Savarez is a long 8 seconds.
   With the Savarez, you will be required to stop pretty much every note
   you play in the bass. With the Aquila, less so.
   The Aquila do remind me of gut basses. I used to have an 11c completely
   strung in gut, and these loaded nylgut strings are very, very close.
   On the other hand...Mersenne says his basses sustain for almost 20
   seconds!!!
   I'll stick with the Aquila.
   Rob

   --

References

   1. https://youtu.be/8FVJMk_Xjv0


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

2016-05-01 Thread Christopher Wilke
   An Aquila banjo string worked just right for the second string of my
   baroque lute. I was able to use the remainder of the strings on other
   instruments. Even if I only bought the pack for that one string, it was
   still cheaper than buying a single second string. It also had the
   advantage of being the only kind of "lute" string I could just pop into
   a retail store and purchase off the shelf anytime.

   Chris
   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

   On Sunday, May 1, 2016, 3:56 PM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com>
   wrote:

   I will most likely be corrected by the string specialists who know
   better, but it seems that the "shiny" nylgut strings live on in the
   form of Aqulia banjo strings.  incidentally, they are on offer for
   quite a bit less than the cost of lute strings.
   RA
   
   From: [2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <[3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu> on
   behalf of Matthew Daillie <[4]dail...@club-internet.fr>
   Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 6:16 PM
   To: Mimmo Peruffo; [5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut
   Dear Mimmo,
   Thanks for responding to my email.
   Would it be feasible for you to offer two types of nylgut, the present
   formula which many players seem happy with, and the shiny variety which
   I know I am not alone in thinking was your best production yet?
   As for synthetic loaded gut, I have had countless conversations with
   luthiers and lutenists hoping that you would soon get round to
   producing
   it, thus offering a new solution to the problem of finding
   satisfactory
   bass strings. I did not get to see any samples but those players and
   makers I have spoken to who did, were all very enthusiastic.
   Best,
   Matthew
   On 01/05/2016 15:21, Mimmo Peruffo wrote:
   > Hello guys
   > Mimmo here.
   > a few answers to the question:
   >
   > 1) the shiny smooth nylgut was  done to have stronger  nylgut strings
   > for the guges thinner of  .46 mm.
   > Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the
   > slippering surfce. It was a pity because  making them in this way
   > produce very strong strings. They go up in tune very fast also
   > The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they
   > are sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the
   extruder.
   >
   > 2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the
   > thinner gauges were too fragile.  Right now I have not understand
   why.
   > Actually they are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but
   > after the rectification process they change and became less strong.
   > I tried a lot of solutions but  with no good results. I agree that
   the
   > texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will
   > have time for them. Rigfht now I am going to  finish my job with the
   > harp strings because there is a very urgent  problem to solve in this
   > field.
   > In short:  the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few
   years-
   > is very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a
   syntetic
   > that work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut
   is
   > not o: too bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that
   it
   > si not  good at all.
   >
   > 3) loaded gut basses
   > it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is
   > still not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but
   > they do not admit this for obvious things.
   > HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to
   > produce very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the
   > past. This job is not fst because there are  people and money
   involved.
   >
   > 4) what about the sintetic loaded strings?
   > I have all the know- how  to produce the sintetic loded bass strings.
   > My problem is that  I am very busy with the harps strings, as
   mentione
   > before.
   > Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen
   > when you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings.
   > I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some
   > prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel
   > almost)
   > timing? well, to be honest i think that  the harp strings will take
   to
   > me 3 months almost. yes yes, I told this thing  againg in the past
   but
   > in those times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation
   was.
   > In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is
   to
   > came with all these news on the table
   > Mimmo
   >
   > -Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie
   > Sent: Sunday, Ma

[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

2016-05-01 Thread Matthew Daillie

Dear Mimmo,

Thanks for responding to my email.

Would it be feasible for you to offer two types of nylgut, the present 
formula which many players seem happy with, and the shiny variety which 
I know I am not alone in thinking was your best production yet?


As for synthetic loaded gut, I have had countless conversations with 
luthiers and lutenists hoping that you would soon get round to producing 
it, thus offering a new solution to the problem of finding  satisfactory 
bass strings. I did not get to see any samples but those players and 
makers I have spoken to who did, were all very enthusiastic.


Best,

Matthew

On 01/05/2016 15:21, Mimmo Peruffo wrote:

Hello guys
Mimmo here.
a few answers to the question:

1) the shiny smooth nylgut was  done to have stronger  nylgut strings 
for the guges thinner of  .46 mm.
Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the 
slippering surfce. It was a pity because  making them in this way 
produce very strong strings. They go up in tune very fast also
The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they 
are sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the extruder.


2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the 
thinner gauges were too fragile.  Right now I have not understand why. 
Actually they are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but  
after the rectification process they change and became less strong.
I tried a lot of solutions but  with no good results. I agree that the 
texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will 
have time for them. Rigfht now I am going to  finish my job with the 
harp strings because there is a very urgent  problem to solve in this 
field.
In short:  the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few years- 
is very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a syntetic 
that work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut is 
not o: too bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that it 
si not  good at all.


3) loaded gut basses
it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is 
still not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but 
they do not admit this for obvious things.
HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to 
produce very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the 
past. This job is not fst because there are  people and money involved.


4) what about the sintetic loaded strings?
I have all the know- how  to produce the sintetic loded bass strings. 
My problem is that  I am very busy with the harps strings, as mentione 
before.
Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen 
when you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings.
I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some 
prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel 
almost)
timing? well, to be honest i think that  the harp strings will take to 
me 3 months almost. yes yes, I told this thing  againg in the past but 
in those times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation was.
In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is to 
came with all these news on the table

Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- From: Matthew Daillie
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 12:25 PM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

Dear All,

I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two
courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny,
smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went
back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from
lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I
have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have
been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact)
and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were
clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up
the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter,
were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost
immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them.

Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44
diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a
53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly
sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way
round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound
and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a
small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which
led to ceased production).

Any thoughts, comments?

Thanks,

Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


-
Aucun virus tr

[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

2016-05-01 Thread Mimmo Peruffo

Hello guys
Mimmo here.
a few answers to the question:

1) the shiny smooth nylgut was  done to have stronger  nylgut strings for 
the guges thinner of  .46 mm.
Unfortunately, 90% almost of players were not happy due to the slippering 
surfce. It was a pity because  making them in this way produce very strong 
strings. They go up in tune very fast also
The problem is that sometime they are not even and this is why they are 
sharp on the upper frets. They are made directly from the extruder.


2) we stopped to produce the tradictional rectified ones because the thinner 
gauges were too fragile.  Right now I have not understand why. Actually they 
are very robust when they are polisshed and smooth but  after the 
rectification process they change and became less strong.
I tried a lot of solutions but  with no good results. I agree that the 
texture is not the best however i can do a better work when I will have time 
for them. Rigfht now I am going to  finish my job with the harp strings 
because there is a very urgent  problem to solve in this field.
In short:  the gut avalaible for these instruments -since a few years- is 
very fragile- So many asked me to 'invent' a way to have a syntetic that 
work similar to this very stiff and oververnished gut ( nylgut is not o: too 
bright). The only alternative is the standard nylon that it si not  good at 
all.


3) loaded gut basses
it is not possible to make the ol loaded gut because the raw gut is still 
not like in the past. This problem afect many stringmakers but they do not 
admit this for obvious things.
HOWEVER, things are going to change: here in Italy we are going to produce 
very good quality of gut ribbons, same of the quality of the past. This job 
is not fst because there are  people and money involved.


4) what about the sintetic loaded strings?
I have all the know- how  to produce the sintetic loded bass strings. My 
problem is that  I am very busy with the harps strings, as mentione before.
Fluocabon strings are ok of course however i wonder what will happen when 
you will hear the sound of these sintetic loded strings.
I am very excited to start to make these ones because I heard some 
prototypes on lutes & theorboes and they are excellent, ( to my feel almost)
timing? well, to be honest i think that  the harp strings will take to me 3 
months almost. yes yes, I told this thing  againg in the past but in those 
times I hd no idea how desperate the harp string situation was.
In November I will attend the EM festival in Greenwich: my dream is to came 
with all these news on the table

Mimmo

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Matthew Daillie

Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 12:25 PM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

Dear All,

I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two
courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny,
smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went
back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from
lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I
have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have
been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact)
and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were
clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up
the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter,
were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost
immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them.

Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44
diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a
53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly
sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way
round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound
and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a
small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which
led to ceased production).

Any thoughts, comments?

Thanks,

Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 





[LUTE] Re: unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

2016-05-01 Thread Martin Shepherd

Dear Matthew and All,

I have some "shiny" nylgut which I bought only a year or so ago (from 
Bridgewood and Neitzert, and I doubt that their stock was particularly 
ancient).  I hadn't noticed any big difference between these and other 
nylgut strings in terms of stability, stretchiness etc.


For me, the rough surface of most nylgut is too much.  If you listen 
carefully you can hear a high-pitched squeak, whereas a well-polished 
gut string is almost silent.  On the other hand the very smooth surface 
of PVDF strings (the thin ones, not the big KF strings we've been 
discussing recently) is too slippery for a proper contact.


The old white nylgut was too stretchy and often too rough on the 
surface.  I used to polish them to make them a bit smoother.  When the 
"new" (supposedly gut-coloured) nylgut came out it was claimed they were 
less stretchy (not true, according to my experiments) and to my dismay, 
were typically - but not always - even rougher on the surface!  The 
"new" strings have always been less consistent than the old "white" 
strings, in stretchiness, in roughness, in trueness, and diameter (check 
with a micrometer). It may be my imagination, but they seem less stable 
in conditions of changing temperature as well, sometimes gut seems more 
stable!


I have largely returned to gut and nylon (!) but it's incredibly 
frustrating not to have decent synthetic strings for everyday use.  The 
only good news is that for basses, the Savarez KF strings have largely 
(but not completely) solved the problem which loaded gut was intended to 
address.


Best wishes,

Martin


On 01/05/2016 12:25, Matthew Daillie wrote:

Dear All,

I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two 
courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the 
shiny, smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before 
they went back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints 
from lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface 
texture! I have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years 
(there have been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always 
publicize the fact) and to my mind these were by far the best for top 
strings: they were clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke 
freely all the way up the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions 
for a given diameter, were extremely durable and could be put up to 
pitch and be stable almost immediately. A great pity they stopped 
producing them.


Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 
diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has 
a 53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was 
incredibly sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on 
the other way round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences 
with some wound and gut strings but I am very surprised that this 
should happen with a small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an 
unmentioned issue which led to ceased production).


Any thoughts, comments?

Thanks,

Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




[LUTE] unexpected phenomenon with Aquila 'shiny' nylgut

2016-05-01 Thread Matthew Daillie

Dear All,

I have just changed some strings on my 6-course in a'. For the top two 
courses I used some nylgut strings from July 2014. These are the shiny, 
smooth nylgut strings Aquila produced for a year or so before they went 
back to the previous formula, apparently after complaints from 
lute-players that the new strings didn't have enough surface texture! I 
have tried an awful lot of nylgut strings over the years (there have 
been umpteen formulas, although Aquila didn't always publicize the fact) 
and to my mind these were by far the best for top strings: they were 
clear, true (except for the first batches), spoke freely all the way up 
the fingerboard, were very close to gut tensions for a given diameter, 
were extremely durable and could be put up to pitch and be stable almost 
immediately. A great pity they stopped producing them.


Anyway, because I don't have many left, I decided to use one 0.44 
diameter string cut in two for the second course of my lute (which has a 
53 cm string length). To my surprise, one of the strings was incredibly 
sharp going up the fingerboard. This morning I put it on the other way 
round and it was fine! I have had similar experiences with some wound 
and gut strings but I am very surprised that this should happen with a 
small diameter nylgut string (maybe this was an unmentioned issue which 
led to ceased production).


Any thoughts, comments?

Thanks,

Matthew



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread simon.lambert
Dear Lutelisters,



I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut 
string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before 
coming up to pitch.  I have tried three strings and they all have broken.



Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted 
well.  I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started 
fraying so I had to remove it.  So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge 
on my nut.



I know this subject has come up before.  Someone suggested boiling the string 
in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the 
others.



Could I have a bad batch of strings?  Does anyone else have experience or 
advice?



Thanks,

Simon lambert


-- 
Scanned by iCritical.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Christopher Stetson
   Dear Simon and Listers,
   I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung
   with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material
   is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week
   break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't
   changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a
   couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep
   repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it
   up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For
   this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality
   seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's
   dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps.
   Chris.

   On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:

 Dear Lutelisters,
 I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new
 nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break
 at the nut before coming up to pitch.A  I have tried three strings
 and they all have broken.
 Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge,
 which lasted well.A  I also tried a gut string, which did not break,
 though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A  So it seems
 unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut.
 I know this subject has come up before.A  Someone suggested boiling
 the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it
 broke just like the others.
 Could I have a bad batch of strings?A  Does anyone else have
 experience or advice?
 Thanks,
 A  A  Simon lambert
 --
 Scanned by iCritical.
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Sean Smith

Hi Simon,

I also went through 2 or 3 strings on my learning curve with nng. I had always 
used a .42mm gut or [old] n.g.* and tried the same with n.n.g. No go. I went to 
.39 and found satisfaction. You might have to go down to .37 or .38

Be sure the string doesn't wipe all the lubrication (if you're using it) out of 
the channel on the way up to pitch. I dab a bit more on the under half o the 
string for the last tone or two up to pitch. Gut will hold a bit more in its 
porous surface than synthetics.

As I see it, gut and old n.g. don't mind the stretch (decreasing its diameter) 
quite as much as the nng. Nng is the smallest bit stiffer so doesn't fit 
through the channel quite as well. As you're tightening the peg you've got a 
lot more tension north of the nut and channel/lube issues work against you so 
the nut will be the weakest link. 

The problem with small synthetic diameters is that they go false a little 
quicker than larger diameters.

Sean

* 60cm going to G (A=440)


On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:

Dear Lutelisters,



I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut 
string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut before 
coming up to pitch.  I have tried three strings and they all have broken.



Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which lasted 
well.  I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon started 
fraying so I had to remove it.  So it seems unlikely that there is a sharp edge 
on my nut.



I know this subject has come up before.  Someone suggested boiling the string 
in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the 
others.



Could I have a bad batch of strings?  Does anyone else have experience or 
advice?



Thanks,

   Simon lambert


-- 
Scanned by iCritical.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Sean Smith

Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before 
going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on 
stage! 

Sean



On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote:

  Dear Simon and Listers,
  I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung
  with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material
  is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week
  break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't
  changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a
  couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep
  repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it
  up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For
  this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality
  seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's
  dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps.
  Chris.

  On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:

Dear Lutelisters,
I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new
nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break
at the nut before coming up to pitch.A  I have tried three strings
and they all have broken.
Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge,
which lasted well.A  I also tried a gut string, which did not break,
though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A  So it seems
unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut.
I know this subject has come up before.A  Someone suggested boiling
the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it
broke just like the others.
Could I have a bad batch of strings?A  Does anyone else have
experience or advice?
Thanks,
A  A  Simon lambert
--
Scanned by iCritical.
To get on or off this list see list information at
[2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

  1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk
  2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Edward Martin
In my experience, the nng trebles are problemmatic.  Firstly, I do not think 
the sound very good, and secondly, they snap and break, not anywhere as good 
sounding or durable as the old ones.  My suggestion is to use nylon trebles.  
Nylon sounds better and is durable.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sean Smith lutesm...@mac.com wrote:
 
 
 Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before 
 going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on 
 stage! 
 
 Sean
 
 
 
 On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote:
 
  Dear Simon and Listers,
  I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung
  with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material
  is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week
  break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't
  changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a
  couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep
  repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it
  up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For
  this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality
  seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's
  dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps.
  Chris.
 
  On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
 
Dear Lutelisters,
I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new
nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break
at the nut before coming up to pitch.A  I have tried three strings
and they all have broken.
Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge,
which lasted well.A  I also tried a gut string, which did not break,
though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A  So it seems
unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut.
I know this subject has come up before.A  Someone suggested boiling
the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it
broke just like the others.
Could I have a bad batch of strings?A  Does anyone else have
experience or advice?
Thanks,
A  A  Simon lambert
--
Scanned by iCritical.
To get on or off this list see list information at
[2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
  --
 
 References
 
  1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk
  2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
 
 




[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Sean Smith

I'll agree with you, Ed, on the durability. Tuning to pitch got sorted out with 
the corrected diameter. As for sound it's a question of whether you're selling 
your soul to the devil in a contract signed with black ink or blue. 

Sean


On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Edward Martin wrote:

In my experience, the nng trebles are problemmatic.  Firstly, I do not think 
the sound very good, and secondly, they snap and break, not anywhere as good 
sounding or durable as the old ones.  My suggestion is to use nylon trebles.  
Nylon sounds better and is durable.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

 On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sean Smith lutesm...@mac.com wrote:
 
 
 Chris speaks truth. Take it up in stages. Leave it for a day at E or F before 
 going up to G. Swapping to a new ng or nng string is not something you do on 
 stage! 
 
 Sean
 
 
 
 On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote:
 
 Dear Simon and Listers,
 I don't have nylgut on my lute, but have several vintage guitars strung
 with it, both old and new, and be advised that I believe the material
 is a bit different. A I've found I need to allow about a one week
 break-in time to stretch out. A I tune it until the pitch isn't
 changing in proportion to the amount of tensioning, let it sit for a
 couple of hours or when I think of it, whichever is longer A I keep
 repeating until it comes close to pitch, then have to keep touching it
 up for at least a month. A Then they tend to last quite well. A For
 this reason, I don't change the trebles often, and the sound quality
 seems to hold up or even improve over time, but of course that's
 dependent on my memory. A Hoping this helps.
 Chris.
 
 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, [1]simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
 
   Dear Lutelisters,
   I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new
   nylgut string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break
   at the nut before coming up to pitch.A  I have tried three strings
   and they all have broken.
   Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge,
   which lasted well.A  I also tried a gut string, which did not break,
   though it soon started fraying so I had to remove it.A  So it seems
   unlikely that there is a sharp edge on my nut.
   I know this subject has come up before.A  Someone suggested boiling
   the string in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it
   broke just like the others.
   Could I have a bad batch of strings?A  Does anyone else have
   experience or advice?
   Thanks,
   A  A  Simon lambert
   --
   Scanned by iCritical.
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 --
 
 References
 
 1. mailto:simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk
 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
 
 







[LUTE] Re: Problems with new nylgut string on top course

2014-09-04 Thread Matthew Daillie
Dear Simon,

One has to be wary about the nomenclature for nylgut strings as Aquila change 
their formula without informing customers. The old white nylgut was replaced by 
the 'new' rather sickly yellow material a few years back. The 0.40 diameter 
strings were very problematic and would indeed snap without warning. I, too, 
tried every trick in the book to make sure the grooves on the nut of my lute 
were smooth before realising that the strings were the problem.

There are now 'new new' nylgut strings available. They used only to exist in 
thick diameters and as long strings (NGE) but they are now available across the 
range. They are very shiny compared to the 'old new' nylgut and the thicker 
strings can be a pain to wind onto a peg because they are very stretchy. I have 
been sent a couple of samples but haven't tried them yet but I have been told 
by other players that they no longer break easily and that the sound is pretty 
convincing. The reference remains the same (NG).

Best wishes

Matthew


On 4 sept. 2014, at 18:26, simon.lamb...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:

 Dear Lutelisters,
 
 
 
 I am trying to replace the top course on a lute with a 0.4 mm new nylgut 
 string, and I am finding that these strings constantly break at the nut 
 before coming up to pitch.  I have tried three strings and they all have 
 broken.
 
 
 
 Previously the lute had an old nylgut string of the same gauge, which 
 lasted well.  I also tried a gut string, which did not break, though it soon 
 started fraying so I had to remove it.  So it seems unlikely that there is a 
 sharp edge on my nut.
 
 
 
 I know this subject has come up before.  Someone suggested boiling the string 
 in water for 20 seconds but that made no difference - it broke just like the 
 others.
 
 
 
 Could I have a bad batch of strings?  Does anyone else have experience or 
 advice?
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
Simon lambert
 
 
 -- 
 Scanned by iCritical.
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] new Nylgut strings

2013-06-16 Thread David Morales
   Sorry for starting a new thread, first of all, i have just joined the
   list so i can't reply to the original thread about nylgut strings.
   For all of you who don't know me, i'm the owner of Cuerdas Pulsadas
   ([1]www.cuerdaspulsadas.com) and we had this issue about 10 months ago
   (strings break as soon as they were tuned).
   Finally, Aquila Corde confirm us that there was a production problem in
   some batches and gauges until 0.50 were affected. They send us new and
   fixed strings and then we send the replacements to our customers .
   After that, all strings from Aquila came with a little stick on the
   envelope in wich you can check the batch details (month and year, for
   example).
   And, most important, the probleam dissapears. We don't have any
   complaint since then. So, keep in mind that it was a specific issue and
   that it's already fixed.
   Regards
   David Morales
   Cuerdas Pulsadas

   --

References

   1. http://www.cuerdaspulsadas.com/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread R. Mattes

Dear collected lute list wisdom,

I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from 
all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension.
Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still
feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the 
bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?

TIA Ralf Mattes

P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
rehearsal ...

--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread Sean Smith

Dear Ralf,

I had the same experience and snapped two .42's learning that New Nylgut won't 
always replace the old Nylgut of the same diameter (the second course did 
fine). My only difference being that my mensur is 60cm. I ordered .39 NNG and 
that solved it. I only use nng for the 1st course, 4th 8ve and occasionally for 
the 2nd course (and the rest gut) so don't have experience in using it 
elsewhere.

My guess is that in winding the old .42 ng to tension it stretched enough to 
actually become .39 in diameter. Nng apparantly won't stretch that long in 
finer diameters. Or alternately, the abrupt bend as the string leaves bridge 
hole may be too much for the small diameter.

Old/white ng does like its stretch: It's the only string  I've found that, 
after about 7 months as a chanterelle, that goes flat in the upper frets 
--leading me to believe it loses a bit more diameter in the center of its 
length over time. After a year of using nng I have yet to observe any 
intonation problems.

Those older nylguts would ocassionally be tricky. I sometimes had success by 
winding to a 4th below pitch and waiting a while, say, an hour and then winding 
to a 2nd below pitch and waiting again in the theory that it needs time to 
adjust internally and/or in the knots. It's certainly not as forgiving as a 
nylon chanterelle but neither does have the nylon's sound, thankfully.

Btw, I have a lute buddy whose 63cm lute has a difficult time supporting gut to 
that pitch and uses a .39 (or less) old ng. You might have to go back to 
whatever had been successful. 

I hope this helps.

Sean



On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:36 AM, R. Mattes wrote:


Dear collected lute list wisdom,

I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from 
all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension.
Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still
feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the 
bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?

TIA Ralf Mattes

P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
rehearsal ...

--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread William Samson

   I've had similar problems with my 67cm lute tuned to f' (440).  The
   string lasted a few days then snapped - this happened a couple
   of times.  I'm now using nylon for my first course.

   Bill
   From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de
   To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36
   Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems
   Dear collected lute list wisdom,
   I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from
   all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
   strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full
   tension.
   Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
   the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still
   feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the
   bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
   top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
   Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?
   TIA Ralf Mattes
   P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
   rehearsal ...
   --
   R. Mattes -
   Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
   [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread Edward Martin
Dear Ralf,

I am mostly a gut user on my instruments, but I do have 2 instruments 
in synthetic strings.  I am familiar with the problem you are describing.

First of all, I think lutes sound their best when strung with the 
same pitch and tension you would use for gut.  In other words, if you 
want to have a gut treble g at a=440, if you exceed 59 cm length, 
it will result in string breaking prematurely.  This is when using 
gut... the same might be for nylgut.  At 63 cm, it is too long of a 
mensur for gut, and it also may be too long for nylgut.  I have never 
had problems with nylon trebles breaking at 63 cm at g.  Also, 
nylgut stretches a lot, and the diameter actually becomes smaller as 
it stretches.  This might be your problem.

Could you use nylon trebles?  I think this would solve your 
problem.  Nylon is not as bright as gut or nylgut, but I think it is 
more sturdy than the nylgut trebles you are using;  with nylon, you 
would be safe in not expecting string breakage. The other option 
would be to use carbon, but they sound very bright, in my opinion.

For now, it seems your options are to play a semi-tone lower at a=415 
(this might not be appropriate, if you are in ensembles tuned at 440) 
, or to use nylon or carbon.  I hope this helps,

ed








At 08:36 AM 6/13/2013, R. Mattes wrote:

Dear collected lute list wisdom,

I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from
all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full tension.
Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still
feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the
bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?

TIA Ralf Mattes

P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
rehearsal ...

--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute
http://magnatune.com/artists/edward_martin





[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread Paolo Busato

Dear all,

I alredy posted the solution three months ago. Mimmo Peruffo suggests to dip 
the string(s) in boiling water for 20 seconds (it worked for me at least).


Best wishes,

Paolo Busato lute-maker
www.busatolutes.com
e-mail: paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com
_
Il contenuto di questa e-mail e dei file allegati è RISERVATO e da
considerarsi utilizzabile solamente dalla persona o dall'ente cui è
indirizzato. Se avete ricevuto questa e-mail per errore, siete pregati di
eliminarla e di contattare il mittente (Legge italiana 196/2003).  The
content of this e-mail and any files is CONFIDENTIAL and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email
and any attachments and contact the sender. (Italian Law 196/2003)
_


  From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de
  To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36
  Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems
  Dear collected lute list wisdom,
  I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from
  all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
  strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to full
  tension.
  Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
  the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they still
  feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the
  bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
  top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
  Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?
  TIA Ralf Mattes
  P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
  rehearsal ...
  --
  R. Mattes -
  Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
  [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

  1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
  2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Aquila Nylgut Problems

2013-06-13 Thread mike murray
   Would dipping well seasoned veteran NngA strings freshen them up? A I'm
   thinking of trying this but if it'd be more likely to kill them I think
   I'll pass
   On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Paolo Busato wrote:

 Dear all,
 I alredy posted the solution three months ago. Mimmo Peruffo
 suggests to dip the string(s) in boiling water for 20 seconds (it
 worked for me at least).
 Best wishes,
 Paolo Busato lute-maker
 [1]www.busatolutes.com
 e-mail: [2]paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com
 
 _
 Il contenuto di questa e-mail e dei file allegati Ae RISERVATO e da
 considerarsi utilizzabile solamente dalla persona o dall'ente cui Ae
 indirizzato. Se avete ricevuto questa e-mail per errore, siete
 pregati di
 eliminarla e di contattare il mittente (Legge italiana 196/2003).
 A The
 content of this e-mail and any files is CONFIDENTIAL and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
 addressed.
 If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email
 and any attachments and contact the sender. (Italian Law 196/2003)
 
 _

 A  From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de
 A  To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 A  Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013, 14:36
 A  Subject: [LUTE] Aquila Nylgut Problems
 A  Dear collected lute list wisdom,
 A  I just tried to switch my (late) medieval lute from
 A  all gut to all nylgut, everything fine, except: the top
 A  strings (63cm / g' @ 440 Hz - using 0.42mm) can't be put up to
 full
 A  tension.
 A  Both strings imediately break directly at the bridge. Strangely
 A  the aren't even close to their breaking point (at least they
 still
 A  feel quite elsatic). Bridge design can't be the problem - the
 A  bridge is rather soft and well worn out (and I never had a broken
 A  top at the bridge, even in much thinner gut).
 A  Is this a known problem. Did I get samples from a bad batch?
 A  TIA Ralf Mattes
 A  P.S.: off course this always happens the day before an important
 A  rehearsal ...
 A  --
 A  R. Mattes -
 A  Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
 A  [1]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
 A  To get on or off this list see list information at
 A  [2][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 A  --
 References
 A  1. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
 A  2. [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.busatolutes.com/
   2. http://paolo.busato-at-busatolutes.com/
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Nylgut Oud strings

2012-05-02 Thread Bruno Fournier
   Hi,

   A

   I'm interested in trying out Mimmo's Nylgut Oud strings on my Moroccan
   Oud.A  Anyone has experience with them? I note that like all Oud string
   sets, the 3 rd string is wound.A  I personally prefer a non-wound
   string on the 3rd course.A  I currently use gut on my first 3 courses,
   any recommendation for Nylgut?

   A

   thx
   --

   A

   Bruno Cognyl-Fournier

   A

   [1]www.estavel.org

   A

   --

References

   1. http://www.estavel.org/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Sauvage Valéry
 As an alternative to gut, I try new nylgut and basses Savarez KF on 5-6-7th
courses, (for the basses, as Carlos Gonzales told us on the french lute
list.)
So the only wounded string left here is the 8th course bass (not used on
this recording) I keep the old string, as it is now not to bright.

Here for a try on two short pieces :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRmYvxgMMvg

Val




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Daniel Winheld
Val- Thank you for sharing this with us; I have been very interested 
in the new nylgut, but last time I tried to purchase them, they were 
unavailable in the USA. First impression- I like the sound very much 
on all courses except the chanterelle- that one string sounds too 
bright, and out of character with all the rest. Your playing seems 
fine; comfortable, relaxed- full, but not pushing too hard. Maybe 
that lute wants a different string on the 1st course?

The instrument for which I need the new nylgut is my Harris-Barber 
Chambure copy vihuela; it has a very rich but subdued sound (Compared 
to my lutes). Old white nylgut brings out its potential sound more 
aggressively than gut, but with enough richness and subtlety still 
part of the tone picture. However, the chanterelle seems to sing 
better with nylon. Comparing this instrument to your lute is probably 
inappropriate; an apples to oranges comparison- not only because it's 
vihuela vs. lute, but also mine has a doubled chanterelle. That one 
course was fabulous in gut, but for overall projection the instrument 
as a whole is better in the right synthetics- old Nylgut 2 - 4, KFG 5 
 6 w/ng octave on 6.

Could you tell us your string length, string diameters  tension, 
pitch standard?

Thank you, Dan


  As an alternative to gut, I try new nylgut and basses Savarez KF on 5-6-7th
courses, (for the basses, as Carlos Gonzales told us on the french lute
list.)
So the only wounded string left here is the 8th course bass (not used on
this recording) I keep the old string, as it is now not to bright.

Here for a try on two short pieces :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRmYvxgMMvg

Val

-- 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Daniel Winheld
One other obvious point I should have remembered; the recording 
process and what I hear on my computer may be distorting the true 
sound- maybe I'm all wrong about that 1st course-  perhaps it must be 
heard in person. Too bad I can't pop over to your place anytime soon. 
I will be trying the NewNylgut on all courses if I ever get any.

D
-- 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Sauvage Valéry
 
I think you're true about the chanterelle, I'll try another one later, this
one its too thin I think.
I'll give the references later in the evening (I'm busy preparing the meal
now...)
V.


-Message d'origine-
De : lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] De la part
de Daniel Winheld
Envoyé : jeudi 17 février 2011 17:20
À : Sauvage Valéry
Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Objet : [LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

One other obvious point I should have remembered; the recording process and
what I hear on my computer may be distorting the true
sound- maybe I'm all wrong about that 1st course-  perhaps it must be heard
in person. Too bad I can't pop over to your place anytime soon. 
I will be trying the NewNylgut on all courses if I ever get any.

D
-- 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Sauvage Valéry
 

-Message d'origine-

Could you tell us your string length, string diameters  tension, pitch
standard?

Thank you, Dan


Here are the infos :
Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm,
A 440

The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for
the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris.


1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg

2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg

3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg

4: NNG 79 t = 2.85

5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG
next time)

6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82

7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85

8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86
(will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too
big fot the bridge and peg holes ???)




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread erne...@aquila.mus.br
Thanks for the info, I will compare it with the values usually used by  
lutenists here in Brazil and let you know about the possible  
deviations I may find!


How do you like the sound of new nylgut compared to the old nylgut ?  
And compared to other strings?


Thanks, Ernesto

Em 17/02/2011, às 17:02, Sauvage Valéry escreveu:



-Message d'origine-

Could you tell us your string length, string diameters  tension, pitch
standard?

Thank you, Dan


Here are the infos :
Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length  
60 cm,

A 440

The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and  
for

the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris.


1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg

2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg

3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg

4: NNG 79 t = 2.85

5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the  
NNG

next time)

6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82

7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85

8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86
(will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be  
too

big fot the bridge and peg holes ???)




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Sauvage Valéry
 

-Message d'origine-

I didn't know that KF went thicker than about .85 or .90, at .95 and thicker
I only have KFG (carbon fiber gut) which I use on the vihuela 5th  6th
course, and diapasons on the archlute. Is your KF clear, or somewhat
off-white, almost beige in color and cloudy?

Have fun with the new strings.

Dan


84 is clear, 116 and 127 are cloudy (usually used for harps, but very nice
as bourdons on lutes !!!)
I'll try .42 and .40 and will tell here ;-)
Val



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Edward Mast
On instruments with bridge and peg holes too small for heavier gauge strings, 
Val, I've found it an easy procedure to enlarge them with a small hobby 
drill.  A very small drill that can be turned with the fingers, and accepts 
various size drills.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Sauvage Valéry wrote:

 
 
 -Message d'origine-
 
 Could you tell us your string length, string diameters  tension, pitch
 standard?
 
 Thank you, Dan
 
 
 Here are the infos :
 Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60 cm,
 A 440
 
 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for
 the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris.
 
 
 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg
 
 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg
 
 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg
 
 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85
 
 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG
 next time)
 
 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82
 
 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85
 
 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86
 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too
 big fot the bridge and peg holes ???)
 
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Guy Smith
You are probably talking about a pin vise, which is available from
machinists supplies (and probably from Amazon.com). I've used an even
simpler approach: wrap several turns of adhesive tape around the shaft of an
appropriately sized drill. That's even skinnier than a pin vise and gives
you enough grip to enlarge a bridge hole. Worked for me when I converted the
basses on my Lundberg 8-course from wound strings to gimped gut.

Guy

-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Edward Mast
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:14 PM
To: Sauvage Valéry
Cc: 'Daniel Winheld'; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

On instruments with bridge and peg holes too small for heavier gauge
strings, Val, I've found it an easy procedure to enlarge them with a small
hobby drill.  A very small drill that can be turned with the fingers, and
accepts various size drills.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Sauvage Valéry wrote:

 
 
 -Message d'origine-
 
 Could you tell us your string length, string diameters  tension, pitch
 standard?
 
 Thank you, Dan
 
 
 Here are the infos :
 Strings : NNG (new nylgut Aquila) KF (Savarez KF) Lute string length 60
cm,
 A 440
 
 The references of the KF are from luthier Carlos Gonzales (Spain) and for
 the NNG, calcul made by luthier Wolfgang Früh, in Paris.
 
 
 1: NNG 38 (too thin I think I'll try 40 next time) tension = 3.33kg
 
 2: NNG 48 t = 2.98 kg
 
 3: NNG 64 t = 2.97 kg
 
 4: NNG 79 t = 2.85
 
 5 : KF 84, NNG 52 t = 2.43 , 2.77 (I'll try to change the 84 KF by the NNG
 next time)
 
 6: KF 116, NNG 70 t = 2.60, 2.82
 
 7: KF 127, NNG 79 t = 2.47, 2.85
 
 8: Kurchner copper KN 5185, NNG 94 t = 2.76, 2.86
 (will try to change the KN by a Savarez KF, but I'm afraid it will be too
 big fot the bridge and peg holes ???)
 
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html







[LUTE] Re: New nylgut and KF basses

2011-02-17 Thread Sauvage Valery


-Message d'origine-

How do you like the sound of new nylgut compared to the old nylgut ?  
And compared to other strings?

Thanks, Ernesto




I like better the new ones, I find it warmer and less noisy under the
fingers. Warmer too compare to the KF I used before. A little bit brighter
than gut for the first courses (as said on another post, I'll try thicker
chanterelle later)
I think it is a good compromise to gut, with un-wounded basses.
I'm waiting for loaded nylgut basses Mimmo is experiencing now...
V.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] loaded Nylgut

2010-12-26 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
   Hello to all guys,

Two days ago I was  able to do nylgut heavier

   So I made  am little batch of strings just for some tests

   These samples are,  at present, of graphite's grey  colour ( due to the
   metallic powder  I used to charge Nylgut); however I will  do some
   changes in the colour.



   A few observations:

   1)  a 1,14 mm diameter string is equivalent to a 1.36 gut string. This
   mean that the loaded nylgut is virtually able to  cover  till the 6
   course on renaissance lutes. Or on 6  7th fetted courses on long
   theorboes ( that often need wound strings). I tried  the loaded nylgut
   like classical guitar 3rd with good results. I wonder how they work on
   the 13 till 14th long theorbo diapasons

   My job is not at the end: I still need to change some extruder's
   paramethers just to  obtain the best performances. If things will work
   in the proper way maybe there is , soon, a new alternative to
   fluorocarbon and wound strings for the 4, 5 6th courses, lond
   diapasons  etc.

   My best regards

   Mimmo Peruffo

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread wolfgang wiehe
my new nylgut arrived today. I ordered it last week from Mathias Wagner. It 
really looks like gut-strings.
greetings
w.
 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:05:43 -0600
 Von: Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
 An: Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Betreff: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

 Curtis, at Aquila USA.  I do not know if he has them in stock 
 yet.  Last time I heard from Curtis, he was still awaiting delivery 
 from Italy.  Remember, it often takes more than a month for mailing 
 something from Italy.  At least, that is my experience (when Mimmo 
 mails something from Italy, it takes it a long time for the package 
 to get out of Italy - sometimes a month - when it gets out of Italy, 
 it arrives soon).
 
 ed
 
 At 11:10 AM 12/19/2010, Daniel Winheld wrote:
 Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
 
 
 
 Edward Martin
 2817 East 2nd Street
 Duluth, Minnesota  55812
 e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
 voice:  (218) 728-1202
 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
 http://www.myspace.com/edslute
 
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Anthony Hind
   Dear Mark
 They are available here in Europe, I saw quite a good stock at
   Wolfgang Frueh's when I got several strings; but Mimmo apparently sold
   all his stock at the Greenwich festival.
   He was making up new stock, but I don't know whether any had been sent
   out to the US prior to this.
   I don't know how fast synthetic string making can be? It has to be
   extruded (which should be quick), but then perhaps also semi-rectified.
   I don't know whether all this is automated, or partly by hand; but I
   did hear that two machines were out of order, recently which slowed
   production down.
   Then of course the strings must be packaged, posted etc. Aquila is not
   a huge company, perhaps 30 or so people involved in the NG side of
   things (I would guess); but possibly somethings have to be done by
   Mimmo himself. Certianly all the chemical research and testing will
   have had to be done by Mimmo himself.
   $
   It is normal practice to have a few people test prototype strings
   (usually the same people), and I imagine there may have been feedback
   and slight changes, before the strings were deemed ready for sale to
   the wider public; when further sets of strings may have again been sent
   out to verifiy probable reactions. Sometimes, production goes no
   further than these initial tests.
   $
   I remember when Dan Larson was attempting to make tungsten gimped
   strings only a few lutenists had the chance to try them, I believe
   there were even a few gold wire ones. I assume production was finally
   thought to be too expensive, as I believe reactions were quite positive
   to the sound of those strings.
   $
   I feel sure things will quickly become as it was with the old NG. It is
   not really surprising if there is a slight stutter as things swing into
   motion.
   $
   Regards
   Anthony
 __

   De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com
   A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net
   Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s
   Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
   Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when
   he will receive a shipment of NNGs.
   Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have
   generously reported their virtues.
   Thank you, Ed and David.
   Mark Seifert
    Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:
   
   Dear Dan
 I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
   experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to
   quite
   the same conclusions as I did.
   $
   I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with
   purple
   haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
   fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker
   string
   for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I
   think
   the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the
   NNG
   might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which
   ever
   you are used to, possibly).
   $
   The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
   $
   The US distributor seems to be
   [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/
   but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
   $
   Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
   Anthony
   $
   $
   
   Daniel Winheld
   Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
different sources can be from each other. I
 was coming to really like
the D'Addarios.
Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
Thanks,
Dan
  Dear luthenists
Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the
   New NG
for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that
   way,
while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure
   Aquila
gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
   Thank you so much about your help Anthony.



This morning  I made 100 Kg almost of the Nw Nylgut strings with the
   extruder machine. Yesterday I made the NGE type.

   Now we need to rectify them ( 5-6 days almost of work) and package
   them, that is quite a tedious operation Please  give me  a bit of
   time more; I hope to be able to send such strings to distributors just
   after Cristamas.

   I amm working to do a good stock so all will be happy.

   Mimmo





   ginal Message -

   From: [1]Anthony Hind

   To: [2]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu

   Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:47 PM

   Subject: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

Dear Mark
  They are available here in Europe, I saw quite a good stock
 at
Wolfgang Frueh's when I got several strings; but Mimmo apparently
 sold
all his stock at the Greenwich festival.
He was making up new stock, but I don't know whether any had been
 sent
out to the US prior to this.
I don't know how fast synthetic string making can be? It has to
 be
extruded (which should be quick), but then perhaps also
 semi-rectified.
I don't know whether all this is automated, or partly by hand;
 but I
did hear that two machines were out of order, recently which
 slowed
production down.
Then of course the strings must be packaged, posted etc. Aquila
 is not
a huge company, perhaps 30 or so people involved in the NG side
 of
things (I would guess); but possibly somethings have to be done
 by
Mimmo himself. Certianly all the chemical research and testing
 will
have had to be done by Mimmo himself.
$
It is normal practice to have a few people test prototype strings
(usually the same people), and I imagine there may have been
 feedback
and slight changes, before the strings were deemed ready for sale
 to
the wider public; when further sets of strings may have again
 been sent
out to verifiy probable reactions. Sometimes, production goes no
further than these initial tests.
$
I remember when Dan Larson was attempting to make tungsten gimped
strings only a few lutenists had the chance to try them, I
 believe
there were even a few gold wire ones. I assume production was
 finally
thought to be too expensive, as I believe reactions were quite
 positive
to the sound of those strings.
$
I feel sure things will quickly become as it was with the old NG.
 It is
not really surprising if there is a slight stutter as things
 swing into
motion.
$
Regards
Anthony

 __
De : [3]gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com
 [4]gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com
A : Anthony Hind [5]agno3ph...@yahoo.com;
 [6]dwinh...@comcast.net
Cc : [7]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s
Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet
 when
he will receive a shipment of NNGs.
Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and
 have
generously reported their virtues.
Thank you, Ed and David.
Mark Seifert
 Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:

Dear Dan
  I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far
 more
experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come
 to
quite
the same conclusions as I did.
$
I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon
 with
purple
haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium
 Nylon
fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a
 thicker
string
for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However,
 I
think
the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or
 the
NNG
might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon
 (which
ever
you are used to, possibly).
$
The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
$
The US distributor seems to be
[1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/
but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
$
Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
Anthony
$
$

Daniel Winheld
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so
 well, and
 your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Anthony Hind
   Mark
  I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a
   200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to
   operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I
   needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris.
   Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded
   strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of
   things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo
   can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously.
   Regards
   Anthony
 __

   De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com
   A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net
   Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s
   Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
   Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when
   he will receive a shipment of NNGs.
   Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have
   generously reported their virtues.
   Thank you, Ed and David.
   Mark Seifert
    Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:
   
   Dear Dan
 I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
   experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to
   quite
   the same conclusions as I did.
   $
   I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with
   purple
   haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
   fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker
   string
   for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I
   think
   the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the
   NNG
   might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which
   ever
   you are used to, possibly).
   $
   The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
   $
   The US distributor seems to be
   [1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/
   but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
   $
   Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
   Anthony
   $
   $
   
   Daniel Winheld
   Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
different sources can be from each other. I
 was coming to really like
the D'Addarios.
Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
Thanks,
Dan
  Dear luthenists
Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the
   New NG
for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that
   way,
while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure
   Aquila
gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly
   Venice
octaves.
$
I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a
   42 NG
on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
$
I only have slight direct playing experience with the old
   nylgut, as I
have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with
   treble
gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker:
   Gamut,
and of course Sofracob).
$

 However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like),
   particularly when
a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish
   valve-like).
$
When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has
   reported,

   [1][2][3]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg0
   2195.h
tml
my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the
   old
nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still
   slightly
whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at,
   say, a
meter's distance.
$
I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the
   string
(as one does

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread gonzornumplatt
Dear Anthony,
I need to apologize for not identifying you initially as one of the worthy 
great ones who should have these strings first, and am glad to hear you 
obtained at least some of them.  There are genuine advantages to living in the 
civilized world instead of the provinces.  Have you ever tried fish gut from 
Damian Dlugolecki in Oregon?--he advised me not to get his strings for some 
reason, perhaps because he prefers dealing with early bowed instrument players.

Thank you for your most welcome message.

Mark Seifert 


 Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: 
Mark
   I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get a
200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to
operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the others, I
needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris.
Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded
strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of
things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only Mimmo
can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously.
Regards
Anthony
  __
 
De : gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com gonzornumpl...@roadrunner.com
A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; dwinh...@comcast.net
Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 3h 31min 16s
Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when
he will receive a shipment of NNGs.
Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have
generously reported their virtues.
Thank you, Ed and David.
Mark Seifert
 Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:

Dear Dan
  I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to
quite
the same conclusions as I did.
$
I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with
purple
haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker
string
for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I
think
the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the
NNG
might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which
ever
you are used to, possibly).
$
The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
$
The US distributor seems to be
[1][2]http://www.aquilausa.com/
but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
$
Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
Anthony
$
$

Daniel Winheld
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
 your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
 just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
 Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
 4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
 For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
 chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
 way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
 all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
 chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
 that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
 stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
 quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
 different sources can be from each other. I
  was coming to really like
 the D'Addarios.
 Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
 Thanks,
 Dan
   Dear luthenists
 Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the
New NG
 for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that
way,
 while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure
Aquila
 gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly
Venice
 octaves.
 $
 I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a
42 NG
 on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
 $
 I only have slight direct playing experience with the old
nylgut, as I
 have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with
treble
 gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker:
Gamut,
 and of course Sofracob).
 $
 
  However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
 find them coldish sounding (bluish

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Anthony Hind
   Dear Dan and Ed
   Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either the
   silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent
   strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped, I
   dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have
   afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of those (or
   perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied with
   lesser strings).
   $
   Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at one
   time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys (as
   Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works quite
   so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all
   discussed, are harmonically very different.
   $
   I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic
   (almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension
   inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either.
   $
   Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably go
   for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly higher
   tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a
   slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make more
   loaded strings.
   These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the other at
   Wolfgang's).
   They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global tension
   of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most; and
   that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is right.
   Thanks again,
   Anthony
 __

   De : Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net
   A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s
   Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
   Anthony, I don't know if this would be of any use to you, but I have
   found one (and only this one!) type of close-wound overspun string to
   sound acceptable on my Baroque lute- and it is the one with SOLID
   silver, not silver plated wire. Until I can get the new loaded strings
   for my lute, I will continue to use the solid silver overspun classical
   guitar D (4th) string for the 11-C, and the (bass rider) 12-B/B-flat.
   For the 13-A I use a solid silver bass viola da gamba string, most
   likely a 5-G. These are all old strings, and although the viol string
   has a gut core vs. the nylon floss guitar string core, it must be the
   solid silver making them sound virtually identical; and they transition
   acceptably from the Savarez KFG 10-D, especially played in context, and
   paired with the right octave string, which helps mask the change.
   I would imagine that a classical guitar A-5 might substitute for a 200c
   loaded. Or the right viol string, probably a 5-G like mine. As far as I
   know, only E.  O. Mari ever made the solid silver wound guitar
   strings, and I don't know if they still do. Viol strings ought to be
   easy to find, however. The ends do take some labor intensive
   modification to go through bridge and peg holes, viols being set up so
   differently. Just a last resort possibility.
   Dan
   I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get
   a
   200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to
   operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the
   others, I
   needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris.
   Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded
   strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of
   things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only
   Mimmo
   can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously.
   Regards
   Anthony
   
   --

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Edward Martin
A few years ago, I saw one of the gold gimped strings.  It was 
beautiful.  I have not asked Dan Larson about them for years, but I 
can imagine that now the cost would be absolutely prohibitive.  But 
now  he uses Sterling silver with the gut, and I can tell the 
difference as compared to copper gimped... they do sound clearer and warmer.

I have never had problems in the past, with mixing various kinds of 
gut basses.  If the string vibrates truly and is the proper tension, 
I do not notice all that much difference in the sound, if one has a 
good gut octave.  I think a person listening could probably not tell 
the difference in sound, but the performer perhaps can.

ed






At 04:29 PM 12/20/2010, Anthony Hind wrote:
Dear Dan and Ed
Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either the
silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent
strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped, I
dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have
afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of those (or
perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied with
lesser strings).
$
Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at one
time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys (as
Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works quite
so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all
discussed, are harmonically very different.
$
I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic
(almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension
inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either.
$
Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably go
for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly higher
tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a
slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make more
loaded strings.
These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the other at
Wolfgang's).
They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global tension
of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most; and
that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is right.
Thanks again,
Anthony
  __

De : Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net
A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com
Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s
Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
Anthony, I don't know if this would be of any use to you, but I have
found one (and only this one!) type of close-wound overspun string to
sound acceptable on my Baroque lute- and it is the one with SOLID
silver, not silver plated wire. Until I can get the new loaded strings
for my lute, I will continue to use the solid silver overspun classical
guitar D (4th) string for the 11-C, and the (bass rider) 12-B/B-flat.
For the 13-A I use a solid silver bass viola da gamba string, most
likely a 5-G. These are all old strings, and although the viol string
has a gut core vs. the nylon floss guitar string core, it must be the
solid silver making them sound virtually identical; and they transition
acceptably from the Savarez KFG 10-D, especially played in context, and
paired with the right octave string, which helps mask the change.
I would imagine that a classical guitar A-5 might substitute for a 200c
loaded. Or the right viol string, probably a 5-G like mine. As far as I
know, only E.  O. Mari ever made the solid silver wound guitar
strings, and I don't know if they still do. Viol strings ought to be
easy to find, however. The ends do take some labor intensive
modification to go through bridge and peg holes, viols being set up so
differently. Just a last resort possibility.
Dan
I should add that I am, myself, a little frustrated as I can't get
a
200c loaded string for love or money. I really need this string to
operate a tweak on my Baroque lute. I managed to find all the
others, I
needed at BN in London, or at Wolfgang's in Paris.
Yet, I quite understand that Mimmo can't spend time making loaded
strings, and also get the NNG up to speed. There are a number of
things, including gut strings, and the basic research, that only
Mimmo
can do; but there are limits to what he can do simultaneously.
Regards
Anthony

--

--


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-20 Thread Anthony Hind
   At first, I had a copper Gimped on 7c of my Baroque lute, between a
   loaded Venice 8c and a 6c Venice. There was absolutely nothing wrong
   with the Gimped string in itself, but to me close to the lute, it
   sounded brighter than the surrounding strings (perhaps a silver or a
   gold gimped might have been less so?).
   $
   Indeed, as you know, I have very much enjoyed your recording of the
   Conradi with a strong presence of Gimped strings, which gave an
   excellent sound.
   However, loaded Venice have a very dark if warm sound, in spite of
   their good  harmonic behaviour; and I think they contrast more with
   gimped than perhaps the first generation did. In deed, I would not
   advise a loaded Venice between two gimped strings, either.
   $
   In relation to this, I have tended to use stronger octaves (than
   basses) to brighten (and lighten) the loaded bass sound, slightly. I
   really do think that works extremely well (like you do I believe?).
   $
   You are probably correct in thinking that a single string would not be
   noticeable to a listener. It would give some of its characteristics to
   its neighbouring strings, which makes it harder to hear.
   I may have become hyper-sensitive to these slight tonal breaks.
   Although I think most all-gut users prefer all gut just because they
   want to maximise homogeneity of sound: I think this does remain
   important to us for most 11c Baroque music (perhaps, a little less so
   with later German Baroque?).
   Avoiding tonal breaks (which ever string types we use) is therefore
   perhaps just an extension of this.
   Regards
   Anthony
   PS Thanks for drawing my attention to the Nigel North Weiss recording.
   It is superb, never mind what strings he is using.
   $
 __

   De : Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
   A : Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; Daniel Winheld
   dwinh...@comcast.net; e...@gamutstrings.com
   Cc : lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 23h 42min 17s
   Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle
   A few years ago, I saw one of the gold gimped strings.  It was
   beautiful.  I have not asked Dan Larson about them for years, but I can
   imagine that now the cost would be absolutely prohibitive.  But now  he
   uses Sterling silver with the gut, and I can tell the difference as
   compared to copper gimped... they do sound clearer and warmer.
   I have never had problems in the past, with mixing various kinds of gut
   basses.  If the string vibrates truly and is the proper tension, I do
   not notice all that much difference in the sound, if one has a good gut
   octave.  I think a person listening could probably not tell the
   difference in sound, but the performer perhaps can.
   ed
   At 04:29 PM 12/20/2010, Anthony Hind wrote:
   Dear Dan and Ed
   Thank you so much for your suggestions. I am sure either
   the
   silver wirewound or the gimped would work, and are both excellent
   strings in their own right. And yes, had there been a gold gimped,
   I
   dare say I would have tried them on C11 and D10 (if I could have
   afforded them). How lucky Dan to have been able to try one of
   those (or
   perhaps not, as I imagine, now, you will never quite be satisfied
   with
   lesser strings).
   $
   Actually, I even remember that Paul Beier and Jakob Lindberg, at
   one
   time mixed the old loaded and gimped strings, as well as Pistoys
   (as
   Dan found he could without problem); but I don't think that works
   quite
   so well with the low impedance Venice ones, which as we have all
   discussed, are harmonically very different.
   $
   I feel, because of this, a tonal break should be more problematic
   (almost from a theoretical point of view) than a slight tension
   inequality; even though I would prefer to avoid either.
   $
   Whereas, I would have liked C11 220C and D10 200C, I will probably
   go
   for a temporary drop in Kg and use D10 190C (but with a slightly
   higher
   tensed octave as compensation), or use a rise to D10 210c (with a
   slightly lower tensed octave). Until, of course, Mimmo can make
   more
   loaded strings.
   These two strings were actually available (one at BN and the
   other at
   Wolfgang's).
   They won't be spot on, but I think it might be more the global
   tension
   of the course, than that of the single string, which imports most;
   and
   that will give me a chance to see if this hypothesis/hunch is
   right.
   Thanks again,
   Anthony
   
   __
   
   De : Daniel Winheld [1]dwinh...@comcast.net
   A : Anthony Hind [2]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   Envoye le : Lun 20 decembre 2010, 22h 25min 01s
   Objet : [LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

[LUTE] New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Anthony Hind

   Dear luthenists
   Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
   for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
   while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
   gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
   octaves.
   $
   I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
   on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
   $
   I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
   have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
   gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
   and of course Sofracob).
   $
   However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
   find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
   a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
   $
   When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
   [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
   tml
   my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
   nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
   whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
   meter's distance.
   $
   I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
   (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out,
   and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
   synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
   sometimes happens with gut.
   $
   The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
   on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
   turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
   I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
   flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
   with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
   However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
   feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
   $
   I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
   for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
   the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
   initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
   slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
   older lower gut trebles.
   This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The
   string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with
   excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower
   gut Aquila trebles.
   $
   I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects
   to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was
   true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my
   Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and
   dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a
   slightly duller sound.
   $
   The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top
   string; and  I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his
   strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong
   clear sound.
   Now I wonder whether it  would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut
   or Baldock lower trebles?
   $
   I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm
   one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or
   in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to
   be patient.  It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this
   new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut.
   $
   I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old
   and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other
   gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes).
   However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not
   seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut
   user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but
   with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top
   string.
   Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel
   that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal
   than the old one did.
   This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will
   evidently vary from player to player.
   $
   In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical
   engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge, to come quite
   close to his ideal strong gut treble, in accordance  with his
   historical string theory set out on his web pages:  it is clear, strong

[LUTE] New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Anthony Hind

   Dear luthenists
   Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
   for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
   while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
   gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
   octaves.
   $
   I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
   on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
   $
   I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
   have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
   gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
   and of course Sofracob).
   $
   However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
   find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
   a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
   $
   When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
   [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
   tml
   my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
   nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
   whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
   meter's distance.
   $
   I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
   (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out,
   and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
   synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
   sometimes happens with gut.
   $
   The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
   on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
   turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
   I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
   flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
   with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
   However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
   feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
   $
   I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
   for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
   the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
   initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
   slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
   older lower gut trebles.
   This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The
   string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with
   excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower
   gut Aquila trebles.
   $
   I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects
   to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was
   true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my
   Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and
   dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a
   slightly duller sound.
   $
   The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top
   string; and  I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his
   strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong
   clear sound.
   Now I wonder whether it  would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut
   or Baldock lower trebles?
   $
   I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm
   one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or
   in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to
   be patient.  It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this
   new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut.
   $
   I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old
   and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other
   gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes).
   However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not
   seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut
   user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but
   with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top
   string.
   Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel
   that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal
   than the old one did.
   This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will
   evidently vary from player to player.
   $
   In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical
   engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge, to come quite
   close to his ideal strong gut treble, in accordance  with his
   historical string theory set out on his web pages:  it is clear, strong

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Winheld
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and 
your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we 
just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse 
Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others- 
4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.

For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute 
chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their 
way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the 
all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon 
chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario 
that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just 
stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in 
quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from 
different sources can be from each other. I was coming to really like 
the D'Addarios.

Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?

Thanks,

Dan


   Dear luthenists
Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
octaves.
$
I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
$
I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
and of course Sofracob).
$
However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
$
When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
tml
my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
meter's distance.
$
I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
(as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out,
and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
sometimes happens with gut.
$
The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
$
I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
older lower gut trebles.
This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The
string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with
excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower
gut Aquila trebles.
$
I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects
to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was
true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my
Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and
dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a
slightly duller sound.
$
The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top
string; and  I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his
strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong
clear sound.
Now I wonder whether it  would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut
or Baldock lower trebles?
$
I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm
one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or
in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to
be patient.  It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this
new string does stabilise quicker than the Old

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Edward Martin
Curtis, at Aquila USA.  I do not know if he has them in stock 
yet.  Last time I heard from Curtis, he was still awaiting delivery 
from Italy.  Remember, it often takes more than a month for mailing 
something from Italy.  At least, that is my experience (when Mimmo 
mails something from Italy, it takes it a long time for the package 
to get out of Italy - sometimes a month - when it gets out of Italy, 
it arrives soon).

ed

At 11:10 AM 12/19/2010, Daniel Winheld wrote:
Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Anthony Hind

   Dear Dan
 I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
   experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite
   the same conclusions as I did.
   $
   I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple
   haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
   fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string
   for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think
   the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG
   might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever
   you are used to, possibly).
   $
   The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
   $
   The US distributor seems to be
   [1]http://www.aquilausa.com/
   but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
   $
   Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
   Anthony
   $
   $

   Daniel Winheld
   Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
different sources can be from each other. I
 was coming to really like
the D'Addarios.
Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
Thanks,
Dan
   Dear luthenists
Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
octaves.
$
I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
$
I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
and of course Sofracob).
$

 However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
$
When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
[1][2]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
tml
my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
meter's distance.
$
I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
(as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it
 out,
and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
sometimes happens with gut.
$
The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
$
I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
for a day and a night before
 testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
older lower gut trebles.
This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The
string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with
excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower
gut Aquila trebles.
$
I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects
to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was
true

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread David Tayler
407 is such a good pitch for lute.


At 08:33 AM 12/19/2010, you wrote:

Dear luthenists
Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
octaves.
$
I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
$
I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
and of course Sofracob).
$
However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
$
When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
tml
my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
meter's distance.
$
I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
(as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it out,
and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
sometimes happens with gut.
$
The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
$
I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
for a day and a night before testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
older lower gut trebles.
This, however had more or less dissappeared by the second day. The
string remains fairly bright yet warmer than the Old Nylgut, but with
excellent sustain. I now feel it blends in rather well with the lower
gut Aquila trebles.
$
I have often remarked that a string can lend its qualities and defects
to surrounding strings, but I hadn't noticed to what extent this was
true of a chanterelle. All the treble strings, particularly on my
Renaissance lute, seemed to have gained slightly in sustain and
dynamics from the new string. I liked this, but some may prefer a
slightly duller sound.
$
The string seems about as stiff under the finger as an Aquila gut top
string; and  I would hazard a guess that it is this string ideal (his
strong treble) that Mimmo was striving to achieve, with a good strong
clear sound.
Now I wonder whether it  would blend in quite so well with softer Gamut
or Baldock lower trebles?
$
I noticed that the 70cm string took longer to stabilze than the 60cm
one. I don't know whether that was due to the difference in length or
in thickness, but two days is not very long, and lutenists do have to
be patient.  It was confirmed for me by a serious nylgut user that this
new string does stabilise quicker than the Old Nylgut.
$
I personally thought there was quite a big difference between the old
and the new type, and this would seem to be the opinion of some other
gut users (Ed and a neighbour who tried my two lutes).
However, nylgut users (and lovers), from discussions on the net, do not
seem to be quite so conscious of the difference. One serious Nylgut
user told me that they were about 97% the same as the old nylgut, but
with better colour and stability, as well as greater clarity on the top
string.
Gut users probably have different expectations of a string, and I feel
that the New Nylgut, at least as a chanterelle, gets closer to my ideal
than the old one did.
This is my opinion, based on my own string experience, which will
evidently vary from player to player.
$
In short, Mimmo seems to have combined his skills as a chemical
engineer with his extensive historical string knowledge

[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Winheld
 I wonder whether the D'Addario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple
haze?

Purple Haze? If that is a special Jimi Hendrix Classical guitar 
string, it seems like fusion gone totally amok.

No, this D'Addario string is just rectified nylon, which gives the 
illusion of being more harmonically true; seeming to have less 
extraneous noise, or perhaps less of the feeling of musical 
deadness that I can't escape sensing from nylon strings, on even 
the best lutes. It is still essentially a cold sound, wrong color: 
... tend to find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), 
particularly when a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses 
(reddish valve-like,)

-Perfect description of nylon vs. the 2nd course gut on my lute. But 
the brightness of the overall sound makes this tolerable- for now- to 
my ears. Sometimes one puts up with a marginally acceptable sound 
until cumulative annoyance makes them suddenly intolerable. I would 
like to get some of the new Nylgut before this event occurs.

Dan




   Dear Dan
  I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite
the same conclusions as I did.

I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple
haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string
for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think
the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG
might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever
you are used to, possibly).

The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.

The US distributor seems to be
[1]http://www.aquilausa.com/
but I don't know whether they will have the new string.

Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
Anthony


Daniel Winheld
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
different sources can be from each other. I
  was coming to really like
the D'Addarios.
Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
Thanks,
Dan

-- 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Winheld

407 is such a good pitch for lute.


Don't be so darn cheap. Cough up another ¢2 and 
you can have 409, which is even better.


Getting close to winter solstice- watch out for 
seasonal affective disorder and wandering frets.


--




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: New Nylgut test as Chanterelle

2010-12-19 Thread gonzornumplatt
Curtis Daily of Portland, OR reports that he does not know as yet when he will 
receive a shipment of NNGs.
Luckily, those most worthy are given them by the string gods, and have 
generously reported their virtues. 
Thank you, Ed and David.

Mark Seifert 


 Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote: 
 
Dear Dan
  I am glad this may be a help, but I see you have far more
experience of nylon strings than I have, so you may not come to quite
the same conclusions as I did.
$
I wonder whether the Adario string was titanium T2 nylon with purple
haze? If so it might have something in common with Titanium Nylon
fishing line. It would be quite low density allowing a thicker string
for the same weight (as I mentionned, once before). However, I think
the T2 could seem quite reserved, if compared to the NNG; or the NNG
might be heard as quite bright when compared to Ti Nylon (which ever
you are used to, possibly).
$
The NNG go down to 1.04, I think.
$
The US distributor seems to be
[1]http://www.aquilausa.com/
but I don't know whether they will have the new string.
$
Best wishes from snow-sludgy Paris
Anthony
$
$
 
Daniel Winheld
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:12:34 -0800
 Thank you, Anthony- just the kind of report that you do so well, and
 your results will spur me on to get some of the new nylguts (Shall we
 just call them NNG?) -  chanterelles for my new workhorse
 Renaissance lute and as far down as possible on some of the others-
 4th course  possibly 5th, if they go as thick as about 1.05 mm.
 For the last month or so I have been using plain nylon on the R-lute
 chanterelle, as even the most durable guts have all shredded their
 way to Gut String Heaven- so the blending of that string with the
 all-gut rest of the lute matters very much. The best nylon
 chanterelle by far that I found was a .46 mm (.018) by D'Addario
 that a student of mine found at a guitar store- but they have just
 stopped making that size. I have been surprised at how different in
 quality, feel, and other subtle factors that nylon strings from
 different sources can be from each other. I
  was coming to really like
 the D'Addarios.
 Anyone know who is dealing the new Nylguts in North America?
 Thanks,
 Dan
Dear luthenists
 Since I believe many gut users will be tempted to use the New NG
 for Chanterelles on their lutes, I decided to test them  that way,
 while keeping all my other strings in gut : my trebles in pure Aquila
 gut, my Meanes as Venices, and my bases loaded with mostly Venice
 octaves.
 $
 I therefore put a 0.44 NG on my 70cm 11c Warwick at 407Hz, and a 42 NG
 on my 60cm 7c Gerle at 440Hz.
 $
 I only have slight direct playing experience with the old nylgut, as I
 have mostly used all gut; so my comparison has to be mainly with treble
 gut (brightish: Aquila, Keurschner, softer: Baldock and darker: Gamut,
 and of course Sofracob).
 $
 
  However, I have heard NG on many other people's lutes, and  tend to
 find them coldish sounding (bluish transistor-like), particularly when
 a lutenist uses them with warm loaded basses (reddish valve-like).
 $
 When I first looked at the New Nylgut, just as Ed Martin has reported,
 
  [1][2]http://www.mail-archive.com/baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg02195.h
 tml
 my initial impression was that the feel was much better than the old
 nylgut, and that the colour was closer to gut, although still slightly
 whiter than Aquila gut, but certainly nothing noticeable at, say, a
 meter's distance.
 $
 I was a little surprised when setting light to the end of the string
 (as one does) to find that it broke into flame. I swiftly put it
  out,
 and all was well (I dare say that is always what happens with
 synthetics),  a little ball had formed without splitting the string as
 sometimes happens with gut.
 $
 The second surprise was when I started to raise the tension of the 44NG
 on the 70cm lute. There was a sudden stretch, with quite a few extra
 turns of the peg (compared with gut), before some stabilisation set-in.
 I wondered about this, as it had been said that the new string was less
 flexible than the old Nylgut. In fact, I didn't notice this so much
 with the  42NG on the 60cm lute.
 However, in both cases, when the string has finally stabilised, it did
 feel about as stiff as gut (and certainly stiffer than the old nylgut).
 $
 I think Ed is quite right to have left his New Nylgut strings to settle
 for a day and a night before
  testing them. I put the chanterelle  on in
 the morning, and tried it out on the 70cm lute in the afternoon. My
 initial impression was of loudness, as mentionned by Ed, but with a
 slightly over-bright sound, and more surface noise pick up than on the
 older lower gut trebles

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: New Nylgut strings

2010-12-10 Thread David van Ooijen
2010/12/9 Edward Martin e...@gamutstrings.com
 As you probably know, I advocate gut.  But, for nylgut lovers, this is a new, 
 improved version.

It seems to me the new Emperor's clothes have the colour of gut. ;-)

David



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: New Nylgut strings

2010-12-09 Thread Edward Martin

Great.

As you probably know, I advocate gut.  But, for 
nylgut lovers, this is a new, improved version.


ed

At 07:29 AM 12/9/2010, Nicolás Valencia wrote:

Dear Ed,

Thanks for your detailed report. It looks like Aquila has improved a lot
their strings. I've seen they're commercially available at Le point
d'accroche. I'll order my own set right away!

Regards,

Nicolás

 -Mensaje original-
 De: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] En nombre
de
 Edward Martin
 Enviado el: miércoles, 08 de diciembre de 2010 21:29
 Para: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 CC: aqu...@aquilacorde.com
 Asunto: [BAROQUE-LUTE] New Nylgut strings

 Dear ones,

 I announced last night that I received a new set of nylgut for my
 13-course baroque lute.  I did put them on yesterday, and I let them
 set overnight.

 I already reported that the new color is very good, and the feel is
 very good, as well.

 Now that I can tune the new strings, I can give a report, after the first
day:

 1.  The stretching seems to be less than old nylgut, and this is a
 very, very good thing, because as you know, the larger strings take
 so long to settle in.

 2.  The feel is very good, as they tend to have a slightly greater
 roughness to the feel, which makes for a better sound, in my opinion.

 3.  The sound:  They are louder, much louder than the old nylgut
 strings, in my opinion.  But, the sound is slightly more pleasant
 than the old strings, and that is another improvement.

 4.  On the set I have, the intonation is very good, especially on the
 upper frets in the midrange strings.

 All in all,

 after one day, I think they are superior to old nylgut.  That is my
opinion.

 ed



 Edward Martin
 2817 East 2nd Street
 Duluth, Minnesota  55812
 e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
 voice:  (218) 728-1202
 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
 http://www.myspace.com/edslute




 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute






[BAROQUE-LUTE] New Nylgut strings

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Martin
Dear ones,

I announced last night that I received a new set of nylgut for my 
13-course baroque lute.  I did put them on yesterday, and I let them 
set overnight.

I already reported that the new color is very good, and the feel is 
very good, as well.

Now that I can tune the new strings, I can give a report, after the first day:

1.  The stretching seems to be less than old nylgut, and this is a 
very, very good thing, because as you know, the larger strings take 
so long to settle in.

2.  The feel is very good, as they tend to have a slightly greater 
roughness to the feel, which makes for a better sound, in my opinion.

3.  The sound:  They are louder, much louder than the old nylgut 
strings, in my opinion.  But, the sound is slightly more pleasant 
than the old strings, and that is another improvement.

4.  On the set I have, the intonation is very good, especially on the 
upper frets in the midrange strings.

All in all,

after one day, I think they are superior to old nylgut.  That is my opinion.

ed



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


  1   2   >