Re: [newbie] numbers lock in kde

2000-03-22 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Yeah, me too.  That really sucks!, or rather is a minor but irritating
annoyance.  

 I have that same problem
 
 On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Michael Holt mewed:
  Hello all!
  I've got another question for ya!  I've got 'numlock at boot'
  enabled on Mandrake 7, but when I start kde, I lose my numbers lock on
  my keypad.  How do I get those numbers to stay on when I start an X
  session?
 
  Thanks,
  Michael Holt
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --
 My new linux web servers with Apache
 
 http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
 http://kittypuss.penguinpowered.com




Re: [newbie] Disableing PNP IN BIOS

2000-03-11 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Matthew Loschmann wrote:
 
 What is PNP os and how do I get there. I am a NEWBIE, everybody starts
 somewhere.

Depends on your BIOS (BasicInputOutputSystem).  This is what ultimately
controls your hardware.  PNP is Plug 'n Play which is exactly that "plug
it in and it's ready to go".  This is really only true for Windos.  When
your computer boots, you'll probably see a logo for your BIOS
manufacturer (Such as Award or American Megatrends) and maybe something
that says "hit this key to enter setup".  You only have about 2 seconds
to do it, so be quick.  Mine is del and my mom's Compaq is F10. 
Hope this helps.
-Josh   

 At 12:18 AM 3/9/00 +0100, you wrote:
 pnp os - 
 - Original Message -
 From: Matthew Loschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 3:12 AM
 Subject: [newbie] Disableing PNP IN BIOS
 
 
  I now know how to enter bios even though there is no prompt but I could
  not find this PnP setting everbody is talking about. Where is it?
 
  Please share
 
  Matt
 
 
 
 



Re: [newbie] increasing the font size in Netscape?

2000-03-09 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Todd Guse wrote:
 
 You need to go into Netscape preferences.  There should be an option on the
 top that says colors and fonts.

I've a prob w/ that too.  NO matter what type of font
size/dynamic/userdefined, etc. I choose, Netscape changes it very little
if anything.  It seems to change fonts more so for mail than for
browsing.  And what's w/ the "increase/decrease fonts" section being
disabled? Fonts seem fine for everything else BUT Netscape.  Maybe v7.x
has this fixed?   
-Josh

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Funk Soul Brother [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 1:46 PM
 Subject: [newbie] increasing the font size in Netscape?
 
 how do i increase thefont size in Netscape? I doesnt let me highlight it in
 the
 view menu???
 
 thanks
 



[newbie] Linux rocks!

2000-03-07 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I have to to say I really like the idea of users helping each other.  I
think that while Linux has proven its worth, it will continue to evolve
much faster than Windos, seeing as W98se is not noticably different from
W95OEM w/ the "power pack", and it crashes just as much.  And tech
support for Windoze software can only give you generic solutions, like
"run scandisk and defrag", "power off for 10 seconds", etc...  W/ Linux,
we're more or less learning together (some more than others), and it's
all really simple once you play around a bit.  Just my $.02... 
-Josh



Re: [newbie] Now I'm Impressed!

2000-03-01 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I wouldn't dare install W98 on my P133/64M, but under LM6.1 it runs very
well.  Netscape has not crashed my box (imagine that) even w/ 30+
Navigator/mail/composer windows open!  I havn't had the time to get TOO
brave w/ Linux (been using it for email mostly), but sometime I'll get
my new kernel in place (for the heck of it really, just to do it,
2.2.13-7mdk seems to be doing fine as is).  When people ask me about
Linux I tell them it's a completely different animal from Windoze as far
as installing software, but that once you get things in place, THEY STAY
IN PLACE!  There's no crazy computer trolls that come in and change my
configuration around and fragment my HDD in the wee hours of the AM.  Of
course, I still use the W98se box to play Tomb Raider and to show my Mom
how do what she needs to do.  I really hope there's not the sort of rush
for Win'00 as there was for '98.  Folks that would just be sad.  I don't
think W2k is on the shelf around here yet, but I havn't looked either
:~}  CUZ I DON'T CARE!  
Just my $.02 on the subject...  Later
-Josh
  


Necrotica wrote:
 
 I just have to share this with someone. Ya know, the more I learn about Linux
 Mandrake the more I love it!!
 
 Up until this weekend I ran a dual boot system of Windows 98SE and LM7. I'm an
 IT professional, and since I need to get certified in it, I decided to blow
 away my 98 partition and install 2000. What a mistake that was.
 
 First, I have to say, if Win2K is Microsoft's best attempt at a stable OS then
 they need to stop smoking crack. That is the WORST operating system I have ever
 used, couldn't use my CD burner, and it kept on randomly hanging on me. It
 truly is pathetic.
 
 Personal obervations aside, I do need to run a Microsoft operating system. So I
 killed 2000 and reinstalled 98 tonight. As suspected, it wrote over LILO and
 couldn't boot into Linux afterwards. Luckily I created a Linux boot disk,
 thinking that would easily solve the problem
 
 Nope. I learned while installing Linux the first time that there is a
 conflict between my video card and my HDD controller. Thus, without a special
 vga boot parameter I get a kernel panic saying it can't mount my root drive.
 Adding the parameter vga=0x0301 works flawlessly.
 
 Unfortunately this parameter does NOT work with the boot disk I created. When I
 try to use the vga parameter it tells me "valid vga options are ask, enhanced,
 or a decimal number." I converted 0x0301 to decimal - no go. Tried all sorts of
 options...still nothing worked. I was one step away from thinking that I would
 have to reinstall from scratch when I tossed in my CD and did an upgrade.
 
 Lo and behold, that upgrade process is the SMARTEST thing I have ever seen. It
 checked my existing rpm database, found that I had everything already
 installed, kept my entire configuration, allowed me to put LILO back on, and
 voila! I'm back in Linux 5 minutes later and I couldn't even tell that it did
 anything.
 
 Brilliance! Pure brilliance! From a technical standpoint thats very well
 thought out. Anyone feel brave enough to try the same thing with NT or 2000?
 
 Its nice to be /home again.
 
 -Necro



Re: [newbie] how to use a winmodem

2000-02-29 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Winmodems are junk.  I wouldn't recommend using one in a Windows box
either.  ISP's don't like them, cuz evertime I've called tech support,
they ask "now, is this a winmodem?", "no? good, now I can help you." 
And they're never called Winmodems on the box of that nice new system
you just purchased, but "V90" and "K56flex".

michael bjorck wrote:
 
 Hello
 Go to site Winmodems are not modems, maybe thet can help you.
 http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
 
 Micke
 
 On Tue, 29 February 2000, KokWay Heng wrote:
 
 
  Hello,
 
  Linux doesn't support WinModem  will never support.
 
  Rgs,
 
  Way
 
  On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote:
   Hi all of the list,
   I am new in this list and I am from argentina, so sorry for my english.
   My question is the following:
   I have a winmodem (HFlex) and I know that it is impossible to use
   with linux. If somebody can tell me if exist any way to use it in linux
   or a place to download a driver please contact me.
   Thanks
  
  
   Emilio Correa
   TEL mensajes: 02932-4-21305 o 02932-4-23486
   e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 AltaVista Smart is Beautiful http://www.altavista.com
 
 Raging Bull?  Sleeping Bear?  Live stock quotes at AltaVista Live!
 http://money.altavista.com
 
 --



Re: [newbie] no make possible

2000-02-26 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Lance Borden wrote:
 
 Joerg Reinhardt wrote:
 
  Since I reinstalled (LM 6.5 on an PI-75mHz, 40M-Ram) the thing is flying (as
  good as scrap can), but there is no "make" command or compiler ( egc++, or
  something simmylar I searched for in /usr/bin, correct place to search for,
  wasn't it?)
 
  I obviously missed to install the compilers!
 
  In the main installation where you can choose, wich packets are supposed to
  be Installed, there is no packet called "compilers" in explict, so wich one I
  have to install, to be able, to download and compile files from the net?

It's not such a bad idea to install nearly everything, and then
uninstall packages as you don't use them.

 
  Joerg
 
 As I understand from the people on this list, Mdk 6.5 is the same as 6.1. My Mdk
 6.1 uses the gcc compiler, which is called pgcc on the installation disk. So,
 look on your installation cd for the rpm packages called pgcc, pgcc-c+, pgcc...
 I believe installing these will get you the make command.
 Lance

There is also a package called "make", so you may want to install that
also.
-Josh



Re: [newbie] FW: newest version of mandrake or redhat...

2000-02-23 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Paul Hendrick wrote:
 
  -Original Message-
  From: toie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 1:42 PM
  To: Newbie
  Subject: newest version of mandrake or redhat...
 
  can anyone tell me what version of either of these is going to support
  winmodems and usb ethernet cards...? thanks...
 
 Not sure about the ethernet card, but I'd say the next distro to use
 the 2.4 kernel, will support that kind of hard ware.  As for
 Winmodems, I'm not sure if they'll ever be supported very well in
 either distro.  You should get a hardware modem, just in case.  I once
 read on the Manadrake site that:
 "Winmodems will never be supported".

Yeah, and from what I understand, they're not particularly GREAT modems
anyway.  They are cheap, however, but that can "inexpesive" or "of
little quality" or maybe a combonation of the two.  Alot of computer
manufacturers will say "V.90" and "56flex", etc., but when you buy a
computer it won't say "It's got a Winmodem!" on the box.

 
  also can anyone give me a really general explination of the whole
  .tar.gz files...and the make this and make install that...i want
 to use
  some patches for things but i need to know more about the make this
 and that
  thing...thanks
  toie
 
 tar.gz is the file extension for a commpressed file (Like *.zip).
 When you unpack the file, and run configure, a script will check that
 you have all of the dependancies for that program.  If you do, it'll
 create a makefile.  When you run make, it will compile the package,
 and make an executable program file.  Make install places the binary
 executable in somewhere like /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin.  That why you
 have to be 'root' to run make install, as root is the user with write
 perrmissions to those parts of the drive.
 I think thats the general rule anyway :)
 
 HTH



Re: [newbie] Defragging

2000-02-18 Thread Josh McCaffrey

From what I understand the ext2 filesystem is less prone to
"fragmenting" than FAT (Windows/DOS).
There is, however a BETA defragmenting package on the L-M 6.1 install
CD.  Use w/ caution, cuz this has not had all of the kinks worked out
and it's better to be safe than sorry.  I personally have never used it,
but am wondering if it could help boost disk performance/increase speed.
(?)
-Josh   

Anthony Huereca wrote:
 
 Is there any regular maintaince that needs to be done to a linux box like in
 Windows with defrag, scandisk, etc? I know that defragging in Windows can speed
 up a system quite a bit, and I had never heard of anything like defragging in
 Linux, which is why I was wondering if you even have to do it. And if so, how
 exactly would you do it?
 
  --
 Anthony Huereca
 http://m3000.1wh.com
 Press any key to continue and any other key to quit



Re: [newbie] Red Neck Linux

2000-02-17 Thread Josh McCaffrey

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, you wrote:
  I lifted below news release parody out of a Linux-oriented email
  newsletter I subscribe to called CONSOLE :
  
  http://console-newsletter.hypermart.net/subscribe.htm
  http://console-newsletter.hypermart.net/
  
  Alan
  
  
  New Linux Distro: Red Neck Linux
  
  Red Neck Computers, Inc., of Chattafoocheeble, Alabama, starting
  shipping version 1.0 CD-ROMs of its new Red Neck Linux
  distribution
  yesterday. "We feel that RNL is a major step forward in bringing
  cheap, powerful, easy-to-use software to the millions of
  technophobes
  living in the South," Sandy Watkins, PR manager for Red Neck
  said in a
  press release.
  
  RNL features:
  * The X Winder System
  * DukesOfHazzard command line shell
  * Netscape 4 with preset bookmarks to such sites as The Big
  Show,
  How to Attract Your Cousins, Bubba's Farm Report, Branson.net,
  The
  Stag Beer Homepage, 101 Recipes for BBQ Sauce, Dukes of Hazzard
  Fan Club, and the Hee Haw Syndication TV Schedule.
  * Deer Hunter, Bass Fishing, and Civil War General games
  * Daisy Duke pin-up preset for root winder
 
 Guess it's a good thing that those of us from Alabama have a sense of humor.
 Funny I don't seem to be laughing. 
  --  LIFE'S LAWS  
 Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people is mentally ill. Check three
 friends.  If they're OK, you're it.

Oh, yeah, I'm in Atlanta, GA.  While I feel that Alabama jokes are
not in such horrible taste, and there's probably not so many
Alabama-Linux users, this joke, however funny it may be, is a bit
stereotypical, if not disrespectful.  Funny none-the-less, however.

L-M content:
Just bumped up my RAM to 64MB's.  Proccessor still at 133, graphics @
2MB's.  Playing around w/ different window mgrs.  KDE still very
user friendly.  Gnome/Enlightenment a bit harder to figure out. 
STILL LOVIN' LINUX!!!
-Josh  

 
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: PGP 6.5.1
 
 iQA/AwUBOKx3tJIc6oBNVYv1EQLnsACdEB832g77Roe41Ts46P0M47VSAhcAnAhb
 w1whal+DZ6y15B06RPJGF8Gm
 =5Yg1
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-



[newbie] on the subj. of the kernel...

2000-02-11 Thread Josh McCaffrey

What is as86?  I found it on the mandrake site, but not on my mandrake
6.1 CD's.  What equivilent do I need to FINISH re-building my kernel?  
I can make mrproper, make menuconfig, make dep, and make clean, but when
I try to make zImage, it goes thru all the usual stuff, and finally ends
w/ these errors:  ...as86: command not found,  *** [bootsect.s] Error
127, and [zImage] error 2.  
Ultimately, I can't finish building a new kernel.
Any ideas?  Thanks!
-Josh



Re: [newbie] Mandrake has BIG BUG Kernel re-build NOT POSSIBLE

2000-02-09 Thread Josh McCaffrey


Since msgs are apparently being reposted (again)...
Is make installed on your machine?  How about ncurses-devel,
glibc-devel, and binutils-rpm?  Not sure, but you might also need bin86
and sh-utils, also.  I didn't get menuconfig to work on the first few
tries, but instead of getting frustrated and blaming Mandrake for what
would be a HUGE oversight, I went to mandrakeuser.org and did some
research.  How can you say so DEFINITIVELY that "it is BROKEN, ie
DEFECTIVE, ie NON-Functional", when many people have had little
trouble?  Just do some RESEARCH b4 you blame others. 

Vic wrote:
 
 Just to announce,
 
 Mandrake 6.1 has a bug, you cannot, no matter what you do,
 no matter how hard you try, there is NO make menuconfig in
 Mandrake 6.1, they screwed up, you install the kernel headers
 and the sources, and still will not make menuconfig or xconfig,
 it is BROKEN, ie DEFECTIVE, ie NON-Functional.
 
 It cannot be done.
 
 --
 Linux Cat



Re: [newbie] Scanners

2000-02-09 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Harold Hartley wrote:
 
 I would never use "root" for a regular user setup and using the internet
 constantly as it could pose trouble for you if you continue...
 root is used to install and uninstall software and to do other changes on
 linux...
 
 I think you should use a regular user account on your linux to be running on
 the internet and stuff for good reason's as I'm sure others would agree with
 me...

Oh, I agree, but if you insist on browsing/emailing as 'root`, at least
change the identity under "mail and newsgroups" in Nutscrape preferences
or similar in whatever email client you're using,
so it won't make it SO obvious.  
 
 
 Harold
 
 -
 root wrote:
 
  Try going to the SANE site, they have a comprehensive list.
 
  Fran
 
  --
   From: Lance Borden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [newbie] Scanners
   Date: 09 February 2000 14:38
  
   I need to get a new scanner, one that will work with my Linux.
   Any of y'all have an HP 3200 up and running with Linux.  It wasn't listed
  on the
   Sane site, but it's the right price and easily available for me.
  
   Or, any recommendations from someone using a scanner under $200?
  
   THANKS!
  
   Lance



Re: [newbie] KDE runs to slow!

2000-02-07 Thread Josh McCaffrey

snip

  KDE runs very slow. It takes 5 min to update each

 
  That's damned odd.
 
  I have a P133/16MB RAM, 500Mb Native and 50Mb Swap
  area.
 
  Oh, that explains everything.
 
  P133/16MB RAM
^   ^
|   |
|   `-- You intend to run a GUI with this?! Stick to the command prompt
  until
|   you've got at least 32. :-)
`-- Ouch. That places your machine squarely in the "desktop
  calculator"
bracket in the CPU pecking order. Try something with a bit more
zip to it. 350MHz is probably a good starting place.
 
  Take your spending cash for the month, but 48 megs of simms with it, and
  blow
  the rest on the fastest AMD chip you can. 

Anyone have the dirt on the Evergreen AMD K6-2 upgrade?  I'm running a
P133 also, and have seen the 333-400mhz AMD upgrades for $100-200US w/
BIOS upgrade.  And then there's SO MANY motherboards around, I'm having
a difficult time choosing one.  With all the graphics cards moving from
PCI to AGP, and ISA being phased out, what should I do?  Testimonials
would be great! i.e: The best MB you've used and Linux compatibility. 
As much info as I can get b4 I buy.
Thanks!
-Josh



[newbie] certain services safe to disable...

2000-02-05 Thread Josh McCaffrey

For the common desktop, what services would be safe to disable? 
Currently, I'm only using my 'puter for email, StarOffice, etc...  W/ out 
doing a reinstall (where you hit F1 for descriptionof each srvc)? 
linuxconf (L-M 6.1) does not tell me what each of the services do.  I
can tell my box is doing too much disk swapping, and is SLOW as a
result.  Just need to do a little "fine-tuning".  Current config =
48mb, 1.6gb, P133.  Till I have the $$ to UPGRADE, I'd like to milk
my box for all it's worth ($1600 in `96) Thanks!
-Josh



Re: [newbie] OT Starting LUG for mandrake

2000-02-02 Thread Josh McCaffrey

hugh wrote:
 
 I was thinking that maybe if enough people lived close enough
 to each other we could start ( Linux users groups ) It might be worth while
 and even fun.   Any thoughts
 --
 QOTD:
 I'm not a nerd -- I'm "socially challenged".

I'm thinking that for this list, if a handful of people live in the same
time zone, that would be amazing, but it seems we're scattered about the
globe.  My idea is this:  I'm printing up a handful of flyers to post on
various bulletin boards around campus announcing a LUG (all distros
welcome)
meeting in the Student Ctr at 12:30 on M's and W's.  It would be cool to
see how many people show up.  I already know there's talk around campus
about starting a LUG, but I don't know any of these people.  This way, I
can get most, not all Linux users together on campus.
Later
-Josh



Re: [newbie] Mandrake Mailling-list in German

2000-01-31 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I would really like to see it.  Ein Deutsches List wird viel spaB
machen.
I could practice written German and learn more about Linux at the same
time!
-Josh

  Gael Duval wrote:
 
 Hello there,
 
 we have been asked several times for new Mandrake lists in German
 language. How many people here would be interested in such new lists?
 
 Thanx to answer me privately.
 
 Gaël Duval.
 
 --
  Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Re: [newbie] DOOM

2000-01-31 Thread Josh McCaffrey

"David Odin (aka DindinX)" wrote:
 
 On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:29:12AM +0000, Josh McCaffrey wrote:
  Well, in the quest to install Doom on my Linux-box, I downloaded lxDoom
  from tuxgames.com,
  and in the process have learned a bit more about how Linux works...
  After a little trial and error, I've gotten as far as 'make install',
  and get the msg "make: ***No rule to make target 'install'. stop"
  What rule do I need to make target install?  This is not mentioned in
  the README's w/ lxDoom, but is maybe some syntax I need to learn for
  make?  i'm entering all commands from the working directory
  (lxdoom-1.4.0)
  Though not an emergency, if I could get some clues as to what I need to
  do, I'd really appreciate it.  Thanks!
  Later.
 
   I guess you have to run the ./configure script before doing the
 'make install'. This script will create the Makefile you're needing.

Yeah, I did all that...  I'll try again...
Hey, it worked!  

 
  Regards,
 
   DindinX
 
 --
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [newbie] DOOM

2000-01-31 Thread Josh McCaffrey

John Aldrich wrote:
 
 On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, you wrote:
  Well, in the quest to install Doom on my Linux-box, I downloaded lxDoom
  from tuxgames.com,
  and in the process have learned a bit more about how Linux works...
  After a little trial and error, I've gotten as far as 'make install',
  and get the msg "make: ***No rule to make target 'install'. stop"
  What rule do I need to make target install?  This is not mentioned in
  the README's w/ lxDoom, but is maybe some syntax I need to learn for
  make?  i'm entering all commands from the working directory
  (lxdoom-1.4.0)
  Though not an emergency, if I could get some clues as to what I need to
  do, I'd really appreciate it.  Thanks!
 
 have you tried "make config" FIRST What does the readme
 say about how to install?
 John

I sent the INSTALL readme as another post just now, couldn't seem to
cutpaste from Kedit to Netscape and I'm too lazy to type the whole
thing.
-Josh



[newbie] DOOM

2000-01-30 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Well, in the quest to install Doom on my Linux-box, I downloaded lxDoom
from tuxgames.com, 
and in the process have learned a bit more about how Linux works...
After a little trial and error, I've gotten as far as 'make install',
and get the msg "make: ***No rule to make target 'install'. stop"
What rule do I need to make target install?  This is not mentioned in
the README's w/ lxDoom, but is maybe some syntax I need to learn for
make?  i'm entering all commands from the working directory
(lxdoom-1.4.0)
Though not an emergency, if I could get some clues as to what I need to
do, I'd really appreciate it.  Thanks!
Later.
-Josh



Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow??

2000-01-13 Thread Josh McCaffrey


I think it all depends on how much extra support is compiled into your
kernel that you're not using or maybe during install when you chose
services you want started at boot time you chose alot you're not using
either.  Linux takes a little tweaking to get type of setup you want, but
it's very flexible, and once you're happy w/ your performance, you can bet
the farm nothing is going to change unless you change it or your HDD gets
killed.  You just have to do some reading, and mess around a little to get
desired results.  There has never been any intention to make Linux perform
well for everybody straight out of the box.
Viel Gluck!
-Josh

Hugh Semmler wrote:

 Well I cant speak for anybody else , But my computer runs at least
 twice as fast as win98.

 On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, you wrote:
  i have mandrake 6.1 and i have win98se.
  i use win98se quite alot and i found that it is much faster then linux
  is that meant to be the case??
  the kernel installed is 2.2.13.22mdk
 
  michael dolan
 --
 "I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere."



Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow??

2000-01-13 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Try "Xconfigurator" at the command prompt.  After you choose your video card,
monitor specs, etc., try choosing more than one resolution, then later, you can
switch resolutions by hitting ctrl alt+.  Use the (+) on the num pad.
Mine is set at 1024x768 and 800x600, but whenever I switch to 800x600, I get a
"virtual screen", which may be what you're describing.  eg: if you move the
mouse past the edge of your desktop, you can see the rest of it, but not all at
once?  I don't care for the virtual screen either.
-Josh

JAMIL HUSSAIN wrote:

 josh

 i installed linux on my machine, but the resolution is set incorrectly, i
 cant see all the screen, what caommand do i use to change the res.

 From: Josh McCaffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow??
 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:13:41 +
 
 
 I think it all depends on how much extra support is compiled into your
 kernel that you're not using or maybe during install when you chose
 services you want started at boot time you chose alot you're not using
 either.  Linux takes a little tweaking to get type of setup you want, but
 it's very flexible, and once you're happy w/ your performance, you can bet
 the farm nothing is going to change unless you change it or your HDD gets
 killed.  You just have to do some reading, and mess around a little to get
 desired results.  There has never been any intention to make Linux perform
 well for everybody straight out of the box.
 Viel Gluck!
 -Josh
 
 Hugh Semmler wrote:
 
   Well I cant speak for anybody else , But my computer runs at least
   twice as fast as win98.
  
   On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, you wrote:
i have mandrake 6.1 and i have win98se.
i use win98se quite alot and i found that it is much faster then linux
is that meant to be the case??
the kernel installed is 2.2.13.22mdk
   
michael dolan
   --
   "I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere."

 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow??

2000-01-13 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Seth Gibson wrote:

 On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Josh McCaffrey wrote:
  desired results.  There has never been any intention to make Linux perform
  well for everybody straight out of the box.
 Tho i think we are seeing that change more and more with Things like lizard and
 such. . .me personally, when i installed mdk the first time it worked great. .
 .of course alot of my hardware is so old, linux was probably very happy with my
 machine(:-D

Yeah, me, too!  If I did have W98 on my box, I'm sure I would see a real drag in
performance.  I have not built a new kernel yet due to time constraints, and the
fact that L-M 6.1 has performed very nicely for me out of the box.  I'm sure that
when I do trim down the stock kernel that I could free up some memory.  On that
note, I started recompiling the kernel a couple of times, and each time it failed
(I forget why) after choosing to save the new kernel, so in /usr/src   there are
"linux-2.2.13" and "linux-2.2.13.old" folders, and the 2 files generated by make
menuconfig (one is .old)
So should I delete these extra files and start again from the beginning?
Thanks!
-Josh



Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow??

2000-01-13 Thread Josh McCaffrey

 snip

 I started
 Josh recompiling the kernel a couple of times, and each time it
 Josh failed (I forget why) after choosing to save the new kernel,
 Josh so in /usr/src there are "linux-2.2.13" and
 Josh "linux-2.2.13.old" folders, and the 2 files generated by
 Josh make menuconfig (one is .old) So should I delete these extra
 Josh files and start again from the beginning?  Thanks!  -Josh

 What kernel are you running now (output of 'uname -r')?

2.2.13-7mdk
-Josh

snip



Re: [newbie] Linux + Mainstream

2000-01-12 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Seth Gibson wrote:

 Greets all!
 In real life i work at a Costco Warehouse, for those who dont know, its
 a warehouse store similar to Sam's Club.  As i was walking the floor today i
 noticed that we started selling MacMillian(sp) Complete Linux 6.5.  Right
 next to Win98 Upgd.  How's that for mainstream?  God grant Win98 boxes
 outnumbered Linux boxes by a factor greater than 2 to 1 but its a start eh?

Oh, yeah, and Best Buy sells several distros for 1/2 what M$ Windows uprades
are.  Caldera, SuSe, Redhat, Mandrake, Slackware, etc...
It's neat, b/c Widows takes up this huge chunk of the aisle, you have little or no
choice as to which Windows you want, and right next door are 1/2 as many Linux
distros, but w/ greater variety and flexibility...  I always bump into people at
the book or computer store under the Unix/Linux section and start talking about
Linux.
-Josh



[newbie] Hello?

2000-01-10 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Anybody left on the list?  I start to wonder what's going on if
I don't receive any mail for 3 days...



Re: [newbie] Instant Internet start?

2000-01-07 Thread Josh McCaffrey

After you do that, create a Kppp icon on your desktop to make it *really* easy
to start.  Right click-New-Application-Kppp.
Under the "Execute" tab, just put "kppp".
-Josh

Alan Shoemaker wrote:

 Steveassuming you are in the KDE desktop, open the application
 starter (the gear with the K on it at the bottom left hand corner of the
 screen) and choose Internet and then choose Kppp (cascading menus).
 It'll need setting up the first time you run it (pretty much like
 dial-up networking on Windows, but without the wizard). ;o)

 Alan

 Steve Leseman wrote:
 
  Is there a way to instantly launch dial-up networking from an icon (like in
  Win98), rather than having to go through Netconfig and three windows each
  time? And how can I get the modem lights to display in the taskbar? Thanks!



[newbie] list moderation PLEASE (rant)

2000-01-05 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I'm sorry, I couldn't help but notice I receive too much junk mail off
of this list.
Since when does the year 2000 have *anything* to do w/ Linux?  Let
alone Mandrake...
There are many other lists available for many other computer topics
and millenium stuff
I hearby suggest that we keep this list open for discussion only about
Linux (specifically Mandrake).
Axalon?  Can you help us out here?  I've been threatened off a list
for sending mail even slightly OT, and you
know what, I never sent anything OT again.  Let's just agree that this
a list for Linux-Mandrake newbies,
and anything that doesn't pertain to Linux-Mandrake in any way shape
or form is OFF TOPIC and punishable by
1)a warning and then 2)a booting.  If people aren't going to show any
consideration for a particular forum of discussion,
then they have no place in the forum.  Just my  $.02.
-Josh
   "I just want info on Linux, please."



[newbie] LUG's in the Atlanta, GA area?

2000-01-02 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I know there must be some Linux users in the area.  Probably many,
just spread a little thin.  I'll be going back to school at Kennesaw
State this week, maybe I can stir up some users on campus.  Later...
-Josh



[newbie] graphics card shopping....

1999-12-31 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I'm shopping around for a good card to run under L-M 6.1.  Is it a bad
idea for me to just look at what chipset the card uses and amount of
ram?  I'm looking at NVidia Riva TNT cards w/ 8-16mb's.  Could
I expect any of these various cards to be supported even if the
drivers are only for Windoze?  I'm not a big gamer, but I expect my
sys performance would increase noticably upgrading from 2mb to 16mb.
Also, what cards use the Trident chipset?  I'm still looking  I
really like the one I've got, it's just a bit outdated.
-Josh



Re: [newbie] Changing partitions

1999-12-30 Thread Josh McCaffrey

R_Yeo wrote:

 On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Kevin Sexton wrote:
  Is there a way in linux (short of reinstalling) to
  rearrange, or resize partitions in linux, I have on a 4 gig
  drive a
  hdb1--small primary windows partition (needed to keep
  windows happy -drive D: to windows),
  hdb5--/--- full!!
  hdb6--/home
  a swap partition
  and some free space.

 If I understand you correctly, you have only one drive but it is called
 hdb??  I thought the convention should be hda for the primary master.

 Anyway, I find Partition Magic (ver 4) very useful for partitioning.
 If you are only expanding partitions and adjusting them, Linux should
 be able to cope easily.  However, if ,for example, you root is going to
 be changed to hdb6 or whatever, you should make a note of it and edit
 you lilo.conf accordingly after altering the partitions.

 Have a TESTED boot disk ready first before anything.

 I have done it twice already (constantly shrinking Windows partition)

Kind of a way of not letting Windows know you're replacing it, or a way of
smoothing your transition to Linux only?  Just keep shrinking that Windows
partition till it doesn't have any virtual memory left, and you finally
have to just put it out of it's misery :-)
-Josh


 and have not had much problems.

 HTH

 --
 Ronald



Re: [newbie] Welcome to list newbie

1999-12-29 Thread Josh McCaffrey

James Mellema wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Welcome to the Cooker List.
  
 
  You just have been subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  More information on http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/flists.php3
 
  To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the
  subject :
 
  unsubscribe newbie.
 
  or go to the web page and unsubscribe via the web interface.
 
  --
  Mandrake Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Does this mean that the entire newbie list is subscribed to cooker?
 --

 --
 James Mellema, CRNA MA
 ---
 Linux User #71650

I was wondering about that too...  this is maybe the 3rd time I've gotten
this msg  If I'm on the cooker list, then people are gonna have some
problems cuz I don't know crap.  Of course I'll try not to expunge info
I'm only partially familiar w/...  Like type "startx" to start X,
Winmodems don't work (read: DON'T WORK), and unless youre not willing to
mess around a bit, no Linux distro gives you exactly what you want
straight out of the box, but you're gonna learn alot about your sys that
you didn't know (or did know but didn't think you had any control over
it)...  OK  Just my 1-1/2% (if that...)
Later
-Josh



[newbie] What am I missing?

1999-12-28 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I went to the MUO site, and found out what I needed to get make to
work.
I've been running Bash, so all I needed was the kernel-headers-rpm,
source, docs, binutils, ncurses-devel, and glibc-devel.  Installed
everything, but when I get to glibc-devel, it appears to install, but
b4 it's done,  I get the msg: ERROR: "execution of script failed".  So
when I look at the RPMs, it's there and it's installed, but is it
installed completely?
So, I logged out, logged back in, and as root, tried again to run
"make menuconfig", but I still get the msg:
"bash: make: command not found"
I'll continue reading any of the README's in /usr/src/linux, but
I think I'm almost there, I'm just missing something really simple.
In "Running Linux", the 6 steps to building a Kernel are described as
"quite painless", but I can't get past 1. Run make config (or
menuconfig in my case).  If someone could either tell me what I need
to do or direct me to the proper documentation, i'd really appreciate
it.  Thanks!
-Josh



Re: [newbie] (Update)What am I missing?

1999-12-28 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Des Wass wrote:

 ++ /12/99, Josh McCaffrey:
  Josh McCaffrey wrote:
  
  Okay, so I needed to install "make" (duh!)  I also installed bin86
  and sh-utils (just in case).  Now bash knows what I'm asking for when
  I type "make"...  Thing is that I can only run "make config", and not
  "menu" or "xconfig" as I'd like.  I get the error "/bin/sh: gcc: command
  not found" when I try menuconfig.  What RPM should I install to let me
  run make menuconfig?  make config asks more ?'s than are listed on pages
  213-217 of "Running Linux" 3rd ed.  Guess it's back off to the
  archives...  Later.
  -Josh

 You might want to try installing the pgcc package from the CD.

That did the trick...  Thanks Des!  I'm just trying to trim down the kernel
cuz there's alot of stuff I won't be doing w/ my box any time soon and i'm
seeing if I can get back a little memory.  This will be my first time
attempting this, but menuconfig makes this task much easier for a newbie that
doesn't understand alot of these options.  I figure that if I trim the kernel
only to support things I'm gonna use soon, that my box might run a bit
faster.  I mean, sh**, I don't really have any use for much of what Linux has
to offer, but it still hasn't crashed yet and that's reason enough for me to
be using it.  Then I can sound cool talking about building my first kernel
;-)  In time I'll be doing more w/ this brilliant system as I learn more
about it.
Seriously,  menuconfig is s easy to understand and it has HELP for most
of the options.  I can hardly wait to to finish the kernel, but now, I need
some sleep...   Later.
-Josh



 --
 |   http://www.prowebservers.com
 Desmond Wass|   Web Hosting Systems
 {Mobile Stolen} |   Phone: 08 9244 4877
 |   Fax: 08 9244 4977



Re: [newbie] Modem

1999-12-24 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Ganesh,
Call the manufacturer for specific info, but I'm thinking"soft" is
short for "software", meaning the modem may require software to work.
This software is most likely for windoze.  It's also a PCI modem.
Have you searched the archives, yet?  This problem is pretty routine,
has been addressed many times, and is well documented.  Okay, I'll say
it  It's probably a Winmodem, and will not, no matter how hard you
try, work w/ Linux.  It's designed only for Windoze :-(   A decent ISA
modem will cost you around $50-60, and needs no software to work.
Good luck, but for future referance, if you do some researching
(FAQ's/archives, etc...), most basic configuration problems have
already been answered in many ways.  It helps if you read this stuff
b4 you install Linux  :-)

-Josh

Ganesh Subramanian wrote:

 I installed linux 6.5 on my pc which contains
 windows 98.

 linux does not recognize my modem.
 My modem is conexant soft k56 PCI Modem.
 ( I am able to use it from windows 98)

 Any set up needs required to acheive this.
  Any pointers would be appreciated ?

 Thanks in advance

 ganesh

 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Re: [newbie] newbie horrors (was Kernel)

1999-12-23 Thread Josh McCaffrey

"Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." wrote:

snip

Josh,

 You at 22 seem a little like me at 50 - I have always liked putzing around with
 my 'puter since I started with a Comodore Vic 20 (boy was that a long time
 ago!). I think though that we most likely fit the discription geek-wannabe,
 since we have no formal education to qualify us as certified geeks.

 M2C,

 Ernie

I don't know, I have been checking out the CSIS program at school.  It covers ALOT
that I don't know and am probably better off not knowing...  not so sure I want a
diploma that says"Certified Geek".  HeHe
Then I'd have to get a job in an OFFICE!  It certainly looks like a decent
program, though.
-Josh



Re: [newbie] small note

1999-12-21 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Yeah, then you can UNINSTALL stuff as you decide you don't need it and need to free
up some HD space.

MickeyMutant wrote:

 I have noticed that many things work Much better if you do a
 Custom install and put in EVERYTHING! i know this takes up a lot of hd space but
 you will run into less trouble if as many rpm's  as posiable are installed
  like the mandrakeupdate that is not installed on the workstation seting
 but is if you choose everthing..

 Mickey



Re: [newbie] A question

1999-12-20 Thread Josh McCaffrey

correct, I had very few problems w/ w95 oem during my last few months (after  3
yrs of much headaches, tweaking reinstalling, patches, etc...).  However w/
Linux, if something happens to go wrong, you can fix it.  May take a little
trouble, but once it's fixed, it's fixed (no problems so far).  As far as I'm
concerned, Linux isn't some GOD of OS, but yet a system unique to windows users
that offers a platform  that can be customized to one's needs w/o purchasing
expensive software.  For what you save in $$, you spend in time, but you also
gain more knowledge of the inner workings of your OS.  I'm just taking it
slowly now, got video, got sound, got ISP connectivity, got SO installed, so
I'll just make little steps, get some books, and maybe in a few months, I'll be
better prepared to tackle Linux more in depth.  And this list has been a
lifesaver!  To all willing to help out a poor newbie, Thanks!
-Josh

mshirley wrote:

 Perhaps we are overlooking the obvious here.  A fresh install of W95/W98
 with
 the patches needed doesn't crash quite as much as you would think.  I have
 been
 running a fresh install of W95OSR2 for several days now without a crash or
 reboot.
 I have noticed that when a lot of shareware is installed, it crashes more
 frequently,
 which seems to backup the rumor I heard once that shareware programmers
 sometimes
 modify system files slightly to detect previous instances of installation.
 It seems
 like this would affect the OS sooner or later.

 On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Dan Ferris wrote:
   |  I have a question.
   |
   |  After spending my day at work fixing some problems with Windows it lead
 me to
   |  think about this.
   |
   | Why is Linux more Stable than Windows???
   |  All I hear about is how great Linux is compared to Windows but none of
 my books
   |  really explain WHY except that it is free.
   |
   |  Linux is multi-user preemptive multi-tasking,  multi-threading, and has
 memory
   |  protection between applications.
   |
   |  Windows is multi-user multi-tasking and multi-threading, and has memory
   |  protection between applications.
   |
   |  Linux never crashes.  Windows crashes all the time.
   |
   |  Now before you anwser.  I want REAL anwsers.  Not anwsers like "Well,
 Windows
   |  sucks because Micorsoft is big and rich."
   |
   |  Anwsers like "Windows sucks because applications don't check to see if
 they
   |  should give up the CPU for another application."(JUST an example) are
 more
   |  acceptable.
   |
   |  I have run Linux for almost a year with no real problems at all.  I
 have run
   |  windows for several years with nothing but grief.
   |
   |  Just curious thanks.
   | Dan



Re: [newbie] Modem Settings

1999-12-20 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Zoom, as far as I know, makes great modems (intern or xtern).  w/ a mail
in rebate, costs ~ $60-80 USD.  If you do have to get a new modem (make
sure you can't set jumpers in your present one), know what com/irq's you
need and set the jumpers b4 install.  I have a Zoom 2919 internal
V.90/56flex, and once configured, operates fine... www.zoomtel.com   Hope
this helps.  Happy Holiday's :-)
-Josh

"Joseph S. Gardner" wrote:

 Ryan Gardner wrote:

  I've used search and everything and looked all
  across my computer to configure my modem.  As of now
  my computer doesn't know I have a modem.  Where can I
  go to configure it?  Thanks a lot.
 
  Ryan
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
  Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com

 Ryan,

 What type of modem do you have??  As a rule PCI modems, Winmodems, and
 HCF don't work.  Nor do any that say "requires Windows xx.x "  They are
 all M$ trash.

 Your best bet is an external (guaranteed to be a serial modem), or any
 modem that allows you to set a jumper to assign a com / IRQ.

 --
 Joseph S. Gardner
 Senior Designer / Technical Support
 Kirby Co.,  Cleveland, OH
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [newbie] KDE screen help

1999-12-20 Thread Josh McCaffrey

It's 22 clicks from bottom back to the top, right?  All I did was went into
Kpackage and unistalled a bunch of the utilities I didn't want (like Tea
Cooker).  Isn't there a way to change the menu properties so that it can have
"more-"  at the bottom a menu that's too long to view in one pane?  Disk
Navigator has it, and so does Netscape, so what's the trick?  Somewhere there's
a config file w/ a couple of lines that can be changed slightly to enable this
feature, right?
Oh, yeah, I can switch resolutions now!  Things is that I chose 1024x768 and
800x600, but if I run 800x600, it gives me that 'virtual desktop' I don't
really care for.  Xconfigurator didn't ask me if I wanted thisJust gave it
to  me.  I think I know what it is.
Later
-Josh

funboy wrote:

 Thanks for the suggestion, but there is a slight problem...
 I am already _at_  1024 X 780.
 sigh
 Even if I knew _how_ to go finer, I wouldn't do it... on a 15" monitor, it's
 already small enough (strangely enough my ctrl-alt-numpad+,- thingie doesn't
 change my display)
 grrr...
 there must be some way to access these menus...
 Any other suggestions?

 Awash in a sea of unknown shortcuts,
 ~phil

 Cyndi  Dwayne Hillier wrote:

  Hi Phil,  I did the same thing myself.  Only way I could fix it was to
  change the resolution to at least 1024 x 780.  Though that is drastic, but
  it did the trick.
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  First off, I just want to say that i installed my first LINUX system a
  few days ago, and apart from a few hangups, everything has been running
  great. I am very happy with the learning curve. Just sitting back and
  watching the emails has been a great catalyst for my own solutions. But
  there is one annoying little problem I still have and can't figure out
  how to fix
 
  Can you please tell me how to see the bottom (unviewable) portion of the
  KDE popup menus? My Utility menu is too large (vertically) to fit on
  screen, and, while it may be amusing for you all to contemplate, I have
  been forced to count and memorize how many arrow hits I made from the
  moment the focus went off-screen in order to access these apps.
 
  I'm sure the answer is quite obvious, but I just can't get it.
 
  thanks,
  ~phil



Re: [newbie] M$ Streaming Media - With what software would you playthis? M$ Media Player?

1999-12-17 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Sevatio Octavio wrote:

 How do you view M$ Streaming Media where the M$ Media Player is required?  Are there 
such players for Linux?

 Seve

Could be... I know you can play Quicktime formats.  I think the viewer is called 
Aktion!.  It starts
automatically when you try to run a QT clip.  Pretty neat, I clicked on a clip 
thinking I'd get a msg like
"open with..." and  I wouldn't know what to use, but it just did it automatically.  
And M$ advocates think (or
so they say) there's no decent software for Linux.  Well, so far we've got the basics 
covered, Office suites,
Netscape, development tools, more than I know off the top of my head, and more coming.
Later
-Josh



[newbie] Increase/Decrease Font(Netscape)

1999-12-17 Thread Josh McCaffrey

May be slightly off topic, but does anyone else notice that when you go
to View, that Increase/Decrease Font section is disabled in a Netscape
window?  Anyone know why this is?
-Josh



Re: [newbie] dropped modem connections with Linux

1999-12-14 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I found that tweaking the init string is the simplest thing you can do to boost
the k/sec w/ a modem.  I'm using a Dualmode Zoom
2919 (56flex/V.90).  If I leave the init @ ATZ, my modem works, but is not very
fast, as this is a default setting that works w/ most modems.  By changing this
to ATS109=2 (or 1, I forget what I changed it to, V.90 or 56flex only), my
speed is more predictable (usually b/t 45333 and 48000).  The server I actually
dial in to could be 30 miles away for all I know.  Sometimes,  the speed drops
to 26400, so I just hangup and try again.  Also, if I use email for a long time
(reading from this list, etc..) I think my ISP drops me, I don't know, I have
to call them cuz in 10 days I've gotten no response from them via email, just
automated replies.  Anyhoo...If by any chance you have the documentation that
came w/ your modem, look for init strings specific to that model, or go to
their website.
-Josh

Jeremy Kersenbrock wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm having what would seem to be a rather strange problem.  My modem almost
 always disconnects suddenly from my ISP after a few minutes online.  The
 time varies -- sometimes 20 seconds sometimes 45 minutes.  KPPP gives me the
 message "pppd died".  Here's the strange part: using the same modem in
 Windows on the same machine calling the same ISP works fine.  The modem is a
 USR Sportster 28.8 External.

 I do have debug for pppd and kppp enabled, and nothing abnormal shows up in
 the log(s).  Linux thinks that the modem simply hangs up and sees no errors.

 Also, on the rare occasion when the connection in Linux lasts, the
 throughput is greatly slower than with Windows.  I only average 1.3K down
 with Linux and the same setup with Windows get me an average of 2.2K.  Then,
 too, I have the registry tweaked up in Windows to adjust the MTU, TTL, RWIN,
 MSS, and NDI Cachesize.  BTW, is there any way to adjust these values in
 Linux?  I already know how to do the MTU and MRU settings, but what about
 the others.  (These two alone seem to make little if any difference).

 I've already contacted my ISP (who supports Linux) and he says my problem is
 likely phone line noise (I live out in the country).  This is quite
 possible, but then why is Linux so much more picky about it?  I have had
 occasional disconnects with Windows, but only a fraction of the number as
 with Linux.

 I am using this initialization string with Linux: ATZ.  I do not have a
 string specified in Windows.

 Is there some remedy for this?  Do I need a new modem?  or do I give up and
 revert to Windows for my surfing and emailing?

 Thanks for any suggesions,
 Jeremy



[newbie] Returned mail...

1999-12-14 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Earlier, I sent a msg to [EMAIL PROTECTED] scolding them for not having
anything L-M specific to add to the discussions, and my mail was
returned, but the address is the same as the one sent to the list.
Okay, maybe it's not my place to delegate, but it irks me when I'm
reading thru 60+ e'mails and then these guys put in something not even
related.

(Mandatory) Linux content:
  A previous post mentioned tweaking the TTL, MSS, MTU, RWIN
settings in the windoze registry...  besides that,  what files in Linux
should I familiarize myself with to adjust other settings like
MinTimeSlice, ComBoostTime, KeyBoostTime, TrapTimerPorts, Vcache,
etc...?  I'm really not sure what to do to get my L-M system optimized
as it's not running as speedy as windows was b4 I trashed it.  I was
thinking since Linux wasn't such a resource hog, that I could have my
48mb/P133  sys running faster than windows.  So far, it has been more
stable, just not as fast.  My swap is set at 96mb and is used only in
small amounts.  I think that somewhere, resources are going to things
I'm rarely, if ever using.  Any tips to bump up the speed of my system,
i.e. , disabling services not used by a common desktop?  Others?  There
has to be something I can do to minimally but noticibly increase my PC's
speed (besides adding more RAM/HD and a new CPU, for now).  Any help
greatly appreciated
-Josh







[newbie] cannot adjust video settings...

1999-12-14 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I've run Xconfigurator and xf86config several times, but thought my
video is set OK now, I can't seem to change it.  According to my monitor
manual (Smile 1280x1024), I can run 800x600 @ 56, 60, and 72hz N-I;
1024x768 @ 87hz Interlaced, 60 and 70hz N-I; and 1280x1024 @ 87 I and 60
N-I, Hsync @ 30-69KHz, and Vsync @ 50-120HZ   Video card default is
1024x768 @ 16bits.  When I try anything other than "a monitor that can
do 1280x1024 @ 60hz", Vsync @ 50-150, and I test X, my screen flickers
and I can't see anything really, and I have to go back and set it to
800x600, monitor that can do 1280x1024, and 50-150 Vsync.  Anyway, I
think those are the settings I'm offered, but the point is that I can't
seem to get the settings to be easily changeable w/ Xconfigurator,
though it offers the option of specifying Hsync's, it does not give me
an option for actually doing so...
So, why is it so difficult to switch b/t resolution settings?  800x600
is OK, but I'd like to have the option of switching resolutions as
needed.  Xf86config isn't any easier to set acceptable settings, and
besides, I'd like to be able to make changes "on the fly".
-Josh




Re: [newbie] Office

1999-12-12 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Dreja Julag wrote:

 I have been hearing that there was an office suite coming out for Linux.
 When is this and where would I find it?

  If you got the boxed version of Mandrake 6.1, it's on one of the RPM CD's.
If not, then maybe try stardivision.com (?) or maybe sunmicrosystems.   You
can probably download it, but it's a pretty big app, even w/ a 56k modem.
Oh, yeah, it's called StarOffice :-)

-Josh



 Thanks,

 Drew Jackman
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: "Benjamin Sher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: "Helios-New" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 7:13 AM
 Subject: [newbie] We need a StarOffice list!

  Dear friends:
 
  I feel that I am in a quandary. There is no mailing list for StarOffice,
  or rather there is one with 23 members on it, which I subscribed to.
  Never got a message from them except for my subscription confirmation.
  With millions of people using StarOffice, there really should be a
  mailing list, and the obvious sponsor ought to be Sun. The newsgroups
  (and I have subscribed to staroffice.com.support.starwriter and other SO
  newsgroups) are just not enough. Were it not for our list, I would have
  had to wait an eternity to get over that insurmountable "Save" problem I
  had last week. And, again, others are probably having problems, too.
  Just
  saw a message concerning SO installation a moment ago.
 
  I spent $50 on QUE's 1,500 page Using Linux. I always check there first
  before asking, and I have found many answers for other issues there.
 
  I do not want to irritate the other members of the list with questions
  about StarOffice. On the other hand, I am sure many members of our
  Mandrake list use StarOffice, too. What to do? I imagine that at this
  very moment hundreds of thousands of new StarOffice users are asking
  themselves this very same question: Where is the StarOffice
  mailing-list?
  In fact, there ought to be at least one for every component of SO. Right
  now I would settle for just one.
 
  Thanks for listening.
 
  Benjamin
 
  --
  Benjamin and Anna Sher
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sher's Russian Web
  http://www.websher.net



Re: [newbie] Problems configuring my modem

1999-12-09 Thread Josh McCaffrey

If you feel you've tried everything else, open your box, disconnect your
modem (ground or earth yourself first), and set the jumpers to a
COM that isn't occupied by your mouse and to any free IRQ except for 15
and (?).  There should be a jumper to disable PnP, do this, and all
should be well.  Good luck.   This worked for me.

-Josh

Moises Lopez wrote:

 Hi, I've been trying configuring my SupraExpress 33.6 PnP internal
 modem, but I can´'t configure at all.
 Any ideas?
 Thank you.

 Moises Lopez



[newbie] Window Maker is interesting...

1999-12-03 Thread Josh McCaffrey

W Maker is kinda cool.  I like how I can mess w/ different desktop
environments, and all my stuff is saved.  So, once I figure out how to
run an app, my stuff is there waiting for me.  I'll probably mess w/ W
Maker and Xfce a little more, but KDE, IMHO is best for newbies still
learning their way around.
-Josh



Re: [newbie] crash tests....

1999-12-03 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I found a good one!  Didn't crash my box, just got *really* slow.  While
I was in WindowMaker, in an Xterm, I typed "start Kde".  So, Kde starts,
my KDE background and icons pop up, everything looks like Kde, but the
icons from WM are still there, and the window boarders are WM, as well
as the right click pop up menu.  Strange.  So I went to bed, and when I
was fixing coffee this AM, I could here some disk activity.  Hmmm... 
Took my screen saver 1-2 secs to respond.  Apparently, my sys was
running entirely on swap, of which only 23mb's was left, so it took
sometimes several seconds to do anything.  If I have 60ns EDO RAM, what
would disk swapping be comparable to?  
Later
-Josh   

Simon Norris wrote:
 
 From a Unix point of view, you can normally have 255 X sessions of whatever
 type open at the same time, so head for that if you want. It should be
 reasonably easy to write a short shell script to spawn an infinite number of
 windows, record the count somewhere, and when (if) it crashes, you can go
 back to the log and see how many windows were open when it crashed.
 
 A common one, again for Unix but should be transferrable to Linux, is to
 open many sessions using the 'top' command in each. Top displays a real time
 monitor of the top ten processes running, and can be an effective load
 testing tool, as it doesn't do anything to the system, it just watches.
 
 However, you may find you're chasing something that doesn't exist. If the
 reliability is anything like what I've seen so far, you will never see it
 crash, it will just get slower and slower, until it seems to stop.
 
 - Original Message -----
 From: Josh McCaffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 7:41 AM
 Subject: [newbie] crash tests
 
 I had to do it.  After having been a Linux user for ~month, I had to do
 the CRASH TEST on my system.  Opening multiple netscape windows should
 be an easy way to crash a system, right?  Right now, I've opened 12
 navigator windows, 1 composer window, messenger, Kpackage, Font manager,
 system information (memory),2 text editors, Mahjongg, CD player, 2
 KFM's, and 2 Konsole's, Kppp, and of course, this window here :-)
 
 Question:  What would be a tougher test?  27 windows seems like alot,
 but it doesn't seem to be doing too much.  Maybe since most of these
 windows aren't really doing anything but waiting?  My free swap is at
 52.68/96.43MB's and I still have 1.4/48mb's of free RAM. We'll see what
 I can do to crash my box...  Not that I want to crash my box, just have
 to see how far I can push it.  I'm not blessed w/ a newer, post '97
 system w/ a fat HD and tons of RAM w/ a 300+mhz CPU.
 Later...
 -Josh



[newbie] Desktopcfg

1999-12-03 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I ran desktopcfg as root and chose to set the system wide default as
Xfce, but when I log in as user, Window Maker starts; if I log in as
root, Xfce starts.



Re: [newbie] Liszt.com -- Correction

1999-12-03 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I think www.list.com or lists.com.  I know when another mail list server
was down, we had a back up list using one of these sites.  If you can
put up w/ a little advertising on all of the posted mails, it's not so
bad.  If it works, it works :)
-Josh

Benjamin Sher wrote:
 
 Dear friends:
 
 www.liszt.com is just a list of mailing lists, not a place to start one.
 
 Which only goes to show that if anyone is interested in starting a
 StarOffice mailing list, then we'll have to look for someone who can
 direct us to information on how to do it.
 
 Anybody know anything about this.
 
 Benjamin
 --
 Benjamin and Anna Sher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sher's Russian Web
 http://www.websher.net



Re: [newbie] test

1999-12-02 Thread Josh McCaffrey

If you're using Netscape, try hitting the "Get Msg" button on the
toolbar.  Maybe your prefs aren't setup to automatically dl new msg's. 
Are you getting any mail at all?  If you're not getting list mail, then
this is probably no help.

-Josh  

Pat Mellema wrote:
 
 Is this getting through I have tried 2 posts and have
 not had any response and they don't show up on the
 list.
 
 Pat Mellema
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
 Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com



[newbie] BIOS tweaks

1999-12-02 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I'm no stranger to my 'puter's (AMD) BIOS setup, but there are a few
parameters I'm not sure exactly what they do.
  Under Chipset Setup, Dram control, I've disabled Memory Hole, cuz
I read somewhere Linux doesn't appreciate memory holes...  There's
read/write Leadoff... Read burst Timing...Write burst timing...Ras to
Cas Delay...Ras precharge... I've got an idea as to what some of these
settings do, just not sure what changing them would do for my system. 
Should I just not fool w/ them as long as my sys is running, or could
changing these offer *any* +performance under Linux w/ a P133, 48MB's
RAM?  If it matters, I bought my 'puter in Fall '96, it's an A-OPEN
AP5C/P and upon boot it says my BIOS date is OCTOBER, 1994.  I did,
however, get an updated motherboard driver (Jan., 1997).  Don't know
what this changed if anything. 
Thank you all!
-Josh



[newbie] crash tests....

1999-12-02 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I had to do it.  After having been a Linux user for ~month, I had to do
the CRASH TEST on my system.  Opening multiple netscape windows should
be an easy way to crash a system, right?  Right now, I've opened 12
navigator windows, 1 composer window, messenger, Kpackage, Font manager,
system information (memory),2 text editors, Mahjongg, CD player, 2
KFM's, and 2 Konsole's, Kppp, and of course, this window here :-)

Question:  What would be a tougher test?  27 windows seems like alot,
but it doesn't seem to be doing too much.  Maybe since most of these
windows aren't really doing anything but waiting?  My free swap is at
52.68/96.43MB's and I still have 1.4/48mb's of free RAM. We'll see what
I can do to crash my box...  Not that I want to crash my box, just have
to see how far I can push it.  I'm not blessed w/ a newer, post '97
system w/ a fat HD and tons of RAM w/ a 300+mhz CPU.  
Later...
-Josh



Re: [newbie] KDE desktop icon permissions

1999-12-01 Thread Josh McCaffrey

I *think* you can log on as root, go into Linuxconf, User accounts, user
accounts, select the user you wish to edit, and add/subtract permisions
available to that user.  Linuxconf just asks me for the root pswd so I
don't have to log out and then log back in as root.  Same w/ Kpackage. 
Don't worry, I'm on my umpteenth install which I'll post about in a bit
:-)  
-Josh

hugahog wrote:
 
 Hi again,
 On a resent install of LM 6.1 I find I do not have permission
 to use most of the desktop icons such as linuxconf and rpm's.
 
 Yes, I created a user account during install and my root desktop
 is OK.
 I tried (as root) bringing up the /home/Larry  desktop and changing
 permissions but did not solve the problem. Strangely, I am allowed
 to mount the cd-rom and floppy and configure autostart but not much
 else. So I suspect there is a file I need to configure as root?
 Any suggestions appreciated.  :-)
 Larry



Re: [newbie] modems for Linux

1999-11-26 Thread Josh McCaffrey

On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, you wrote:
 Hi,
Can anybody send me a complete lists of current brands and models
 of modems for Linux? I have tempted to go ahead and buy from a vendor but I 
 know the vendor will tell the wrong things about the modems that
 are supported by Linux. Can anybody help me?
 

Hmmm, a complete list?  My ZOOM 2919 dualmode works fine (contrary to Bynari's
claim that it wasn't a supported device), but the plug n play feature I think
was only for windoze.  Just know which IRQ and COM port you need to use, set the
jumpers (they're labled), put it in an empty slot, plug in your phone lines,
open kppp, under the modem tab, set it for the corresponding port (COM1=ttys0,
2=1, etc.), enter your dial-up settings, click ok, click connect, and  all
should be well.  

 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [newbie] aol

1999-11-22 Thread Josh McCaffrey

Yeah, they suck, and they're overpriced, but for some reason or another people
think there's more to do on AOL.  Call me crazy, but all I need is a number to
dial in to, an e-mail box, a browser with which to view HTML documents,  maybe
some graphics and JAVA and I'm happy.  Their software is stupid.  The whole
interface is for people that need the web served to them on a platter.  I liked
it when I cancelled my free trial and they called me twice to try to get me back,
and so I asked very politely if I could get their terrific software to work on
Linux.  No.  Why not?  I just had a good time pestering this poor CSR.  I hope I
didn't ruin her day.  It's not her fault AOL sux.  However, I was polite, and
maybe I planted the Linux seed in just one more person's head.
-Josh


Sean Armstrong wrote:

 AOL SUCKS! Nuff said.
 They don't have PPP access.  Their service sucks.  They are afraid of ppp
 because
 people wouldn't use THEIR proprietary software.  AOL is nothing more than
 another WINDBLO$E of the internet.  If you try to get any info from them
 , they'll send you a generic answer saying that they are aware of the problem
 and are working to correct it.  In english this means, Use our software, or
 TUFF #$!*.
 If you don't believe me try writing their technical service about this
 problem.
 Sorry for the rant.
 SA

 Larry Coolidge wrote:

  AOL Has to run to dial-up.  AOL 5.0 is PPP compatible, but the AOL software
  has to be running.  It will only run under Windows, so Linux isn't going to
  work.
 
  From: "Ronald J. Yacketta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [newbie] aol
  Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 22:34:21 -0500
  
  On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, you wrote:
  Yeah, get a real ISP ;)
  
  on the other hand (I never used AOl so I am going out on a limb here)
  does A-O-HELL offer dialup ppp? if so then you could possibly (not sure
  tho)
  use kppp
  
 If aol is my isp, is there anyway for me to get on the internet
  through  linux? If so, how? I tried using wine, but that just crashes.
   
Thanks
jas
  
 
  __
  Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 --
 When GOD endowed human beings with brains, He did not intend to guaratee them.



[newbie] can only use modem as root

1999-11-17 Thread Josh McCaffrey

List,
 Today, I spent some more time trying to solve my problem(s), to no
avail.  Maybe I'm missing something, but that's the reason I subscribed
to a newbie list.  Apparently, many of you have had various config
problems to varying degrees, so I can only hope that someone on this
list has had a similar problem, specifically only being able to initiate
a modem connection when logged on as "root".   It's gotta be something
simple, I know, but I'm not sure where to begin.  Thank-you all.
Please don't flame me for using Mindspring, as it has been a very fast
and reliable connection.

Josh
Atlanta, GA



[newbie] ISP connection only works for ROOT?

1999-11-16 Thread Josh McCaffrey

List,
After getting my modem to work under L-M 6.1 (which support told me
wouldn't work), I've discovered I can't find Kppp anymore (Murphy's
Law?).  So, I'm using KWvDial in lieu.  There seems to be no way to
change the AT commands, though I changed them under Linuxconf, but when
KWv dials up my ISP it uses an init string other than the one I want. 
The wierdest thing is that my modem is only detected when I'm logged in
as root.  Also, the FIND utility can't find KPPP, only KPPPLoad
(whatever that does).  Anyhoo, the installation went fairly well, and
I've gotten everything setup except for the scanner which I havn't
fooled w/ yet.  The modem took the most time, and I ended up disabling
plug n play and setting it up manually (gotta move my box somewhere more
accessible).  This is a learning experience, right?  Like I spent the
last 3 yrs fooling w/ windoze only to drop it like a hot potato. Good
thing this is my system, and everything I wiped out was mine, right? 
Boy, this is fun ;)

-Josh, ATL, GA  
2wk old Linux Newbie



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.1 PowerPack

1999-01-17 Thread josh mccaffrey

Benjamin wrote:

 Dear friends:

 I just purchased the Mandrake 6.1 PowerPack this afternoon (from
 LinuxMall). I won't be getting it till Wednesday.

 Just curious:

 Mandrake says on their web page that the PowerPack includes the
 installation CD, 1,800 rpms and a third CD with commercial applications
 (plus a CD for the source code for each of the above, making for a total
 of 6 CD's).

 Does the CD with commercial applications include any that are not
 normally available on the Net or at www. freshmeat.net or elsewhere? And
 are they demos, shareware or what? And is StarOffice 5.1 included?

StarOffice 5.1 is included as a 30 day full-trial pending your
registration.  Don't know if registration is free or not as my trial isn't
up yet.
-Josh



 Thank you so much.

 Benjamin

 --
 Benjamin and Anna Sher
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sher's Russian Web
 http://www.websher.net