The same as any another SM? It's just a connectorized radio with 25db dish.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 19, 2014 6:19 PM, "Matt via Af" wrote:
> Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet? Curious on actual
> latency an
>"
mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The same as any another SM? It's just a connectorized radio with 25db dish.
Josh Luthman
Offi
President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
>
>
>
> From: "af@afmug.com"
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com"
> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM
> To: "af@afmug.com"
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePM
esday, November 19, 2014 6:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
And different firmware!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 19, 2014 7:23 PM, "Gino Villarini via Af"
mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Exactl
hman via Af [
> af@afmug.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:26 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
> And different firmware!!!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy,
> Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync
>
The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync.
>
> The same as any another SM? It's just a connectorized radio with 25db dish.
>
>> Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet? Curious on actual
>> latency and throughput with GPS
The ptp, yes.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 19, 2014 7:54 PM, "Matt via Af" wrote:
> > Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync
> >
>
> The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync.
>
> >
> > The same as
> The ptp, yes.
Oops, I forgot to include ePMP PTP Force 110 in my question. Anyone
got there hands on them yet? Spec sheet says 17ms latency with GPS
enabled in PTP. Was really hoping for less then that.
>> > Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync
>> >
>>
>> The Force 110
2ms check again
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs/epmp_force110_ptp_specs-2
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 19, 2014 7:59 PM, "Matt via Af" wrote:
> > The ptp, yes.
>
> Oops, I forgot to inclu
Isn't the 2ms without sync?
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
2ms check again
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-s
--
> *From:* Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [
> af@afmug.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
> 2ms check again
>
>
> http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force11
tworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/ePmP-Force-110/m-p/35810#U35810>
Thanks,
Sriram
From: Af on behalf of Mathew Howard via Af
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Isn't the 2ms without sync?
__
It's not going to be any different. The software release that comes out about
that time makes the different performance differences... other than having a
GigE interface...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Ma
The 2 ms is with or without sync on 2.4?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sriram Chaturvedi via Af"
To: "Mathew Howard via Af"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:03:13 PM
Subject: Re
2 ms is without sync
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The 2 ms is with or without sync on 2.4?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics
9:24:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
2 ms is without sync
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The 2 ms is with or without sync on 2.4?
-
Mi
Date not firm yet. Probably late in 1Q of next year.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:54 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
I know that reduced sync latency was on the menu. What Q should we expect that
> Hi,
>
> Please allow me to clarify.
>
> The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE
> ports.
>
> The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the single GigE
> port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary
> PoE. GPS capabilities will b
: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
> Hi,
>
> Please allow me to clarify.
>
> The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE
> ports.
>
pensive.
>
> The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsyncedcan it sync, now or tomorrow?
> Latency with sync?
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
> To
n it sync, now or tomorrow?
> Latency with sync?
>
>Paul
>
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
>To: af@afmug.com
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
>> Hi,
>
inal Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please allow me to clarify.
>>
>> The Force 110 use
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Hi,
Please allow me to clarify.
The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd uni
, 2014 12:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from
buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connectorized unit without sync.
:-)
I expect that, like the connectorized radio without sync, that yo
Broadwick - Lists
> via Af
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
> The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from
> buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connector
.
I wasn’t aware that was the case
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists via
Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that&
om] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
> via Af
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>
> The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from
> buying that unit and swapping the radios f
://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp/
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Burris @ Internet
Comm. Inc via Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Yes in training it was confirmed that the ePmP can get power and sync
nc via Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Yes in training it was confirmed that the ePmP can get power and sync through
CMM 3&4 but the 3 may be tricky to workaround.
Also you can gps time your PTP li
Comm. Inc via Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Yes in training it was confirmed that the ePmP can get power and sync through
CMM 3&4 but the 3 may be tricky to workaround.
Also you can gps time your PTP li
-tech.com
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sakid Ahmed via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Some clarification on this topic –
Only the GPS Sync Connectorized unit can do any
rom: "Jeff Broadwick via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:16:38 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
You need to let your trainers know Sakid.
I was specifically told that you COULD use a non-sync connectorized radio as a
sync’ed AP using an external pulse
). You will
have to swap it out with the GPS module to do any kind of sync.
Thanks,
Sriram
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:37 AM
To: mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
Can the force 110 receive
- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini via Af"
To: ""
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:51:18 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
I was under the impression that the force ptp was based on the AP module, hence
the gigabit port..
Gino A. Vi
-il.com
From: "Gino Villarini via Af"
To: ""
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:51:18 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
I was under the impression that the force ptp was based on the A
Guess not. I am so ready for a replacement for these Force 100 units.
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:11 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via
Af wrote:
Are these things shipping yet?
In the webinar this morning they said early November if I remember
correctly.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Alan West via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 4:39 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
Guess not. I am so ready for a replacement for
from our channel partners in
December.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Alan West via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 4:39 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
Guess not. I am so ready for a replacement for these Force 100 units.
On Tuesday, October 21
Ah, I didn't realize there was a 110 and a 110 PTP.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "John Butler via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:57:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] eP
omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
*From: *"John Butler via Af"
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
So the 110 PTP uses the GPS radio, or is it a different radio with sync over
power only and no on-board GPS? I thought I
utler via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 2:56:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
Hi George: I want to clear up your questions about the Force product.
The Force 110 ( C058900C042A (FCC)) is as the spec sheet describes - a radio
module and the dish. You c
oun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
> (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:11 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
>
>
>
> So the 110 PTP uses the GPS radio, or is it a different radio with sync
g.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
(Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:11 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
So the 110 PTP uses the GPS radio, or is it a different radio with
sync over power only and no on-board GPS? I thought I remember rea
you use GPS Sync as opposed to the Flexible Mode of
operation.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110PTP
Will there be an option to use the GPS sync with the PTP110? If so what
I told them to make a snap-on radome with the sub-reflector integrated
into it. That would provide less wind load and keep ice off of the
feedhorn, plus speed up assembly.
I'm not sure what the polarization is. I thought the Force100 was -/+45,
so the 110 is probably the same, but there's no w
__
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110
I told them to make a snap-on radome with the sub-reflector integrated into it.
That would provide
Hi,
The Force 110 is a Horizontal Vertical.
Dan
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard via Af
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110
A radome would be nice, I hope they do come out with one.
The Force100 was
Thanks for the heads up on that. I am working on scheduling some upgrades
to take place on Sunday evening. All of our current gear is 2.6.2.
Have you loaded 3.0-RC27 on any of them yet?
Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-
It's always been standard for us to update and template the radio in the
cool office before heading outside.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Vince West wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on that. I am
Same here, we always update to the current stable firmware and load a
template on every radio before it leaves the office. It's odd they're
shipping these with an RC though... one of our guys asked me yesterday if
he needed to update one to 2.6.2 since it was already 2.6.2RC.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 a
: Friday, July 08, 2016 10:25 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 200
Same here, we always update to the current stable firmware and load a template
on every radio before it leaves the office. It's odd they're shipping these
with an RC though... one of our guys asked me yesterday if
n beta.
>
> For that matter, the whole “release candidate” designation is confusing.
> Is that like “presumptive nominee”? It’s either released, or it’s beta.
>
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard
> *Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 10:25 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP F
,
> unless the product itself is still in beta.
>
> For that matter, the whole “release candidate” designation is confusing.
> Is that like “presumptive nominee”? It’s either released, or it’s beta.
>
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard
> *Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 10:25 AM
>
r that matter, the whole “release candidate” designation is
confusing. Is that like “presumptive nominee”? It’s either
released, or it’s beta.
*From:* Mathew Howard <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 10:25 AM
*To:* af <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Where did you order them from?
On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote:
> We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. Pretty
> beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn N-type connections.
> It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual
A few questions:
How bad was the assembly?
Do they recommend sealing those N Connectors? (ugh)
The jumpers look a little on the “low end”. Any transition concerns?
Any range tests yet?
GLOBAL QUESTIONS FOR ANYBODY USING THE EPMP gear
- What range are you generally getting from the “nak
Sure looks like dual slant to me.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Osborn via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. Pretty
beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angl
Wincomm, I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek (Loganet) via
Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:24 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Where did you order them from?
On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Greg
n the next week
or so.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek (Loganet) via
Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
A few questions:
How bad was the assembly?
Do they recommend sea
That back connector looks like a challenge to weatherproof. Do they give
you some kind of cover to go over the whole back of the feed assembly? If
they did, I might just not bother taping the N connectors.
Did I see somewhere where the next generation will be integrated anyway,
with no jumpe
Can you tell what type of finish is on the u-bolts and nuts? It looks
too shiny for galvanized. Do they (the nuts and bolts) respond to magnets?
We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. Pretty
beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn N-type connections
I am sure I have seen that back waveguide casting before. Perhaps a cheap
Laird...
http://www.lairdtech.com/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=4734
-Original Message-
From: Greg Osborn via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePM
Same N connector thingies, but the ones on the Laird are in the same
plane (front to back).
bp
On 9/17/2014 8:39 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
I am sure I have seen that back waveguide casting before. Perhaps a
cheap Laird...
http://www.lairdtech.com/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP
sector is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with
an explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its thing.
Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain to
weath
On this topic:
I'll be at their roadshow in Albany tomorrow. If anybody has ePMP
questions that they need answered, I'll put them on my list and button
hole somebody from Cambium into answering them.
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP
sector is slant and t
Is there a 2.4ghz version yet? last I heard, these only came in 5ghz.
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:41 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white
on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy.
bp
On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP
sector is slant and the i
For the price it should Make Espresso too
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 2:04 PM, "Bill Prince via Af" wrote:
>
> George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white on
> rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy.
>
>
> bp
>
>> On 9/17/201
Not sure how/why Proxim is still in business myself. Their gear has
always looked out of line WRT price/performance. I must be a minority
or something.
Would you like a hot apple pie with that?
bp
On 9/17/2014 11:14 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
For the price it should Make Espresso too
Yeah, no. I don't need yet another platform to manage. There are many
other things I want to say, but I can't. I'll leave it at that.
On 9/17/2014 1:03 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:
George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white
on rice. They claim that it will sync wi
From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white
on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy.
bp
On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (
radio use a shorter frame. I'm
> sure they already tried that.
>
> -Original Message- From: Bill Prince via Af
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
>
> George, you ought to be all over
hoot off a good I told you so email.
Rory
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:21 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Not sure how/why Proxim is still in business myself.
://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hohhof via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:25:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with
ePMP/320. Seems like it wou
af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:21 AM
>To: af@afmug.com
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
>
>Not sure how/why Proxim is still in business myself. Their gear has
>always looked out of line WRT price/performance
With a name like WORP, it's got to be good!
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hrbek (Loganet) via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Is the WORP stuff any good?
On Sep 17, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af
5ghz
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:41 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4
e: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:21:28
To:
Reply-To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Not sure how/why Proxim is still in business myself. Their gear has
always looked out of line WRT price/performance. I must be a minority
or something.
Would you like a hot apple pie with that?
ginal Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini via
Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:32 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Vivato!
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
:25 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with
ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use a
longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame. I'm
Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pkranz=unwiredltd@afmug.com] On Behalf Of
Shayne Lebrun via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
450 is being made to sync with ePMP, by increasing frame duration to match.
100/430/320
@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:23:30 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
This would be a VERY bad thing for people with PMP450 networks.. Increasing
the frame duration to match the ePMP will double the latency of the 450
platform.
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - U
g.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
450 is being made to sync with ePMP, by increasing frame duration to match.
100/430/320 will likely see no new changes. This is what I got from an ePMP
roadshow.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof v
h or so,
which, supposedly, a better pricing structure.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+slebrun=muskoka@afmug.com] On Behalf Of
George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beef
://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Shayne Lebrun via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 8:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
(gosh, I hope I'm allowed to say all this, but what the hell, they didn't
say 'and don&#x
18, 2014 8:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
(gosh, I hope I'm allowed to say all this, but what the hell, they didn't
say 'and don't repeat nothing!' and it's not like other road-show goers
can't ask themselves)
Oh, I'm sure it'll be u
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Prince via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 8:45:28 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Maximum of 512 MB of memory on the RB230. I don't think that's enough
to handle full BGP roues these days.
bp
A little birdie mentioned to me that the Proxim gear will use the same
timing products as Canopy, and if I heard right, that is via the serial
timing cable or sync over power.
Which then means that you can plug Proxim WORP stuff into CMM, CTM, or
Packetflux timing things.
bp
On 9/17/2014
Do you think that's all they mean by "sync with Canopy"? Surely they know
better.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
A little birdie mentioned to me that
a Af wrote:
Do you think that's all they mean by "sync with Canopy"? Surely they
know better.
-Original Message- From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
A little birdie mentioned t
mean by "sync with Canopy"? Surely they
>> know better.
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Bill Prince via Af
>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:15 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
>>
>>
>> A little birdie men
in any way?
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+slebrun=muskoka@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill
Prince via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:38 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
I'm a natural skeptic. Especially with Proxim. But, accept
Their announcement said it would time right in with Canopy.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Prince via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:15:47 PM
Subject: Re: [A
On 9/22/14, 17:08, Josh Reynolds via Af wrote:
What ant/radio is that?
I'm guessing a small Radiowaves.
~Seth
>
> *From:* Bob Hrbek via Af
> *Sent:* Monday, September 22, 2014 10:08 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
>
> This wall is 7" thick poured concrete, complete with rebar galore.
> Drilling holes on a rounded structure to mount pre-dril
It's expected, yes.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Matt wrote:
> Will these eventually have GPS sync with a firmware update for frequency
> reuse?
>
> It's expected, yes.
Do they have a GPS antenna port? Not seeing one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFyNKpoIHO4
>>
>> Will these eventually have GPS sync with a firmware update for frequency
>> reuse?
>
Yes. It's the AP hardware. Just a software tick disabling sync right now.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 16, 2015 1:30 PM, "Matt" wrote:
> > It's expected, yes.
>
> Do they have a GPS antenna port? Not seeing one.
>
> http
That's just a standard Force 110 in that video - not a PTP, the PTP is the
exact same hardware as the synced AP and does have a GPS port (it even
comes with the GPS antenna), but has it currently has sync disabled in
software, but Cambium has stated that they are planning to enable sync for
point-t
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
