Maximum time for a process to run before voluntarily
relinquishing the processor .
flem
--- Yi Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anybody tell me what's the meaning of ios
> command =
> "process-max-time". I couldn&#
11.0 code did you try to load ?
flem
--- "Maness, Drew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an old IGS-R that I'm trying to get up in my
> lab. The eprom has IOS
> 9. While it has been fun using IOS 9 I would like
> to use a more up to date
> IOS. At least I
multiple frames , one token --> (1)
flem
--- Faisal Athar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Please solve my confusion for this as I am getting
> different answers from
> different resources..
>
>
> Early token release
>
> (1) allows one token and mor
?
ARP on itself has nothing to do with LANE . ARP works
simular then on a real ethernet. ARP was there before
ATM and no changes to ARP were necessary to keep it
working .
If I read your last question , can I imply that you
consider ARP to work at the network layer ?
flem
--- David Richard
Keepalives .
flem
--- Cisco Wave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am receiving this packets from a Cisco router
> running (C2600-I-M), Version 12.1(3)T and
> multicasts.
>
> Any idea what are the use of it ?
>
> ETHER: - Ether Header --
Mmmm , BUS contention in a token ring environment ?
I pass on this one ;-)
flem
--- "Thangavel .V.M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question extending to this discussion,
> whether this early token
> release will create a bus contention ?
>
> Thanks / Tha
Ask colt why C is the correct answer .
Just ask , they won't shoot you ;-)
Ask what info "sh interface" reveils in regards to cpu
usage .
I would pick D , but ... i am not colt .
flem
--- Hunt Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got the following question from
this
is the best way to do it .
Better is to use a sniffer to get this kind of info .
Top talker is the device (source) that sends the most
packets or bytes (not necessary the same thing) on
your segment .
The top talker on the groupstudy list is the one who
sends most emails to the list ;-)
condition .
It is a defensive behavior .
In general throttles are bad . To much process
switched traffic or to much junk flying in the routers
direction
flem
--- Natasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When doing a (show int) on a 2500 part of the output
> says "shinterface"
That is correct .
2901 , 2902 are based on supI
2926F , 2926T are based of supII
2926G based of supIII
flem
--- Tony van Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't the cat2900's (NOT XL's all look that way.)
>
> The 2926, 2901 are 5000 series based
ot; state.
Fix your routing so that you can do an extended ping
between the Dlsw peers .Fix this and Dlsw and Dlsw
will work . Take a look at your routing tables
flem
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Richard Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROT
Can you post a sh diag ?
flem
--- shanjun zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dear all,
>
> who can tell me what's the problem? thanks very
> much.
>
>
> like these:
> --
>
> System Bootstrap, Ver
If the cli don't give you the option you need then you
are running a version that does not support what you
wonna do .
Timed access list are not in 11.3 .
Upgrade ... upgrade ... .
flem
--- Srihari Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having cisco2600 router.
> i want t
cco is your best friend ;
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/iosw/iore/iore113/prodlit/705_pp.htm
Page down to security features .
It is in 12.1
flem
--- Srihari Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thans for u r reply.
> but which IOS will support timed access list?
>
yes .
flem
--- kz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to perform VLAN routing on 2600
> routers?
>
> thanx
> kz
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/
I believe that the network command with mask for EIGRP
is introduced in 12.0.4T . So it is definite in 12.1 .
CSCdj00824 ( amongst others has relation to this )
flem
--- John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'network' statement in EIGRP is classful and
> ac
Yes you can .
It is nice to recreate things with a minimum on
routers .
flem
--- Nomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to connect Serial interface of a
> single router back to =
> back (using cable DB-60 --->V35 than roll over or
> cross cable V35 =
> &l
Yep nagle is only for sessions with the router as one
end of the connection.
flem
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does setting 'service nagle' on a router have any
> effect on TCP sessions
> transitting the router, or does it only have an
> effect on sessions that
>
It is somewhat long but interesting .
All this nagle stuff has to to with end systems .
At the bottom of this email is nagle himself about
some tcp end station problems .
flem
Newsgroups: poster
Subject: Re: Nagle algo. in Unix-TCP
Summary:
Expires:
References: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Dovelet ,
Don't understand the question .
Do you mean QLLC --> to LLC2 ?
flem
--- Dove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone tell me how to configure a Cisco 2500
> router so that it can
> route X.25 packet (serial interface) to llc2 packet
> (eth
Always.
flem
--- frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks
>
> frank
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosu
nt gives you the
same functionality , or not ?
router(config)#interface serial 0/1.200 multipoint
flem
> We used this in
> my last company, but it made my head spin everytime
> the IXC changed the mapping.
>
> -j
>
> Flem wrote:
>
> > Always.
> >
> >
king is that having high degrees will help me
> to get in top
> management/director sort of jobs with Fortune 100
> companies in long run
> future.
> Any comments?
Good luck .
flem
>
>
>
__
If the cdp config is in place and it does not work
then
I bet it's a bug . It's been broken before .
flem
--- Chris McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> I've seen this when doing frame relay multipoint
> on
> subinterfaces or NBMA on the m
Between NIC and switch ?
What is the name of this handshaking ?
flem
--- Circusnuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe there is a handshake going on with the
> switch & NIC
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL
802.1Z ? or 802.3z ?
This is gigabit stuff is it not ?
Is cisco implementing 802.3z on his gigabit
switches ? Don't think so .
Switch will buffer , if no buffer , then drop packet.
Do you know what vendor implements pause frames ?
flem
--- Chris McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Or ;
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/z/public/presentations/jan1997/HFpsbits.pdf
Written by a cisco guy ... you are rights cisco do
implement it.
flem
--- Chris McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is true...sorry. I was reading a cisco
> document
> on the Cat 6
getting
impressed
I loved the old style no buffer , drop packet .
Things are really getting more complex is it not ?
flem
--- Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys, this "pause" frame does not appear to have
> anything whatsoever to do
> with flow con
eah I guess I was confused a bit by
> the summary, which I
> may have misinterpreted as autoconfig
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Flem
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:56 PM
> To: Chuck Larrieu
> C
ld process
a larger percentage of the packets that will allow
routing and, consequently, the caches to stabilize.
show ip spd
show int switching' has some extra info too.
flem
--- Adam Quiggle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:11 PM 1/14/01, J Roysdon wrote:
> >I've
narios above .
This 'pause' thing makes sense if you have a one to
one connection with similar speeds . I fail to see how
this mechanisme can solve the 100Mb---10Mb buffer
problem .
I do not think that is was indendent to solve this
type of problems in the first place .
Thats what I make
narios above .
This 'pause' thing makes sense if you have a one to
one connection with similar speeds . I fail to see how
this mechanisme can solve the 100Mb---10Mb buffer
problem .
I do not think that is was indendent to solve this
type of problems in the first place .
Thats what I make
ld process
a larger percentage of the packets that will allow
routing and, consequently, the caches to stabilize.
show ip spd
show int switching' has some extra info too.
flem
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yah
Also rip v2 will support a netmask .
CSCdp45009 is addressing this issue, but the ddts is
not fixed yet .
flem
--- Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The network statement is used on the originating
> router.
>
> For the classful routing protocols, the network
>
You are 100% right .
TrBrf999 and TrBrf998 are SRB'ed via ring 101 .
flem
--- vtam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following is a sample from CISCO Document CD
> about Token ISL, i have one
> question about it that can the VLAN 40 and 50
> communication each other? The
;
"debug token ring event" ... 90% you get a human
readable output of the problem your facing .
flem
--- Eric Gunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could anyone tell me what happens to a UDP packet
> when it is fragmented?
>
> I assume that it is lost because UDP i
dial
> in
> to the router. Anyone know how to set this up to
> simulate a t1 coming in? Such as, from my 56k phone
> line to the external modem to the serial port? Or
> is
> my logic flawed?
>
No way to simulate T1 with a dialup connecti
Eric ,
>
> If a RIF goes through 1rtr with an id of 0191 and
> then rtr2 which has an id
> of 0191. Since the ids are the same would this not
> be an incorrect
> configuration
Not perse .
There are topologies were you want the same
ringnumbers to avoid excessive explorer traffic .
Especially
CE).
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Jason Roysdon, CCNP/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
> List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
> Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
>
>
> "Flem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
[EMAIL PRO
It is based on a PCI bus .
I think the backplane speed is in the range of 20Mhz
for 3620 and 25Mhz for the 3640 . Databus is 32 bit
for the 3620 and 64 bit for the 3640 .
flem
--- Perry Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone know the backplane speeds of 3600 series of
> routers?
Or just do 'sh process cpu' on a router and see all
processes that needs cpu intervention .
flem
--- Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other major thing the CPU has to do besides
> switch (route) packets to
> their output interface is learn t
you are very successfull ... it worked
--- danny jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is a test
>
>
> __
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Actually ...
--- Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious about other peoples experiences with
> TAC on products "gone
> bad"...
>
> 1) Get call while almost in bed at 9:30 PM
> 2) 3548XL GigE interface goes down...
> 3) Restart and power cycle switch to no avail..
> 4) Swap out GBI
txQ count
0/200
router#
This is also good to test SAP filters . You can create
multiple sessions all with different lsap/rsap values
.
Please see inline ;
flem
--- Don Dettmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to work out some dlsw scenarios in the
> lab.
-#- -length- -date/time-- name
1 3466245 Jul 12 2000 17:15:51
cat5000-sup3.4-5-4.bin
312621 Sep 15 2000 13:51:58 flemish6
flem
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I cannot find the config
Does the card show up in a sh diag ?
flem
--- alex campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a cisco 2620 router...running IOS 12.0, I
> have also just got a 4T
> serial card,
> every time I power up the router...I get the message
> 'Unspecif
You mean the rsp-boot on bootflash ? No , not
automatically .
bootldr is set via configuration . Nothing is done
automatically .
flem
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On a 7500 w/ an RSP module, does the bootflash and
> bootldr get automatically updated when a new version
> of IOS
In NVRAM , on board memory .
flem
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But i've just deleted all files on bootflash: (apart
> from the image)
> and recycled power - the config wasnt lost !
> there is now no flash in the slots either.
> so it must be kept somewher
problem on the ring beside this
message ?
flem
--- Jim Barksdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is what I found and the site where I found it
>
>
>* The Active Monitor removes circulating
> frames from the ring. As
> a
>frame passes the Active Monito
used for routing call
setups and is implemented in the ATM switches . It is
not implemented in the LEC .
flem
--- cslx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and how to config PNNI?
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
> information go to
> http:/
Yes , HSRP is supported on all cisco routers .
On what interface are you trying to configure HSRP ?
Nothing to do with the IOS version .
Probably looking in the wrong place ;-)
flem
--- Andre Fecteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is HSRP supported on 2600 seri
Sure it does .
What would we be with RIF if end stations cannot
interpret it ?
flem
--- FRS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can a PC understand/read a RIF?
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
> information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.
The ATM address is used during call setup .
Once a data direct exists data is switched using
´VPI/VCI pair´ .
If you look at a trace you will not find the ATM
address .
flem
--- Zhang Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear group:
>
> I found confused with ATM address ,my qu
he
> LMI is taking care of it
> right?
Keep-alives on a frame-relay interface implements LMI
on that interface .
( do sh int ser#/# and look for the LMI settings )
flem
>
> Correct me if I am wrong
>
> thanks
>
> Jason
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been fo
Paulo ,
Next time it crashes open a tac case .
Get a sh stack , sh log , sh version or better a sh
tech and attach it to the case .
Depending an the 'kind' of crash a core dump is
required .
Are there any messages in the log of the RSM ?
Have fun ,
flem
--- Alves Sgt Paulo
start with.
If you gathered the info look at cco if you can match
a bug id , if you can't open a tac case .
flem
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Team, Here is a piece of the show ver command:
>
> Atlanta_1 uptime is 10 minutes
> System restarted by watchdog timer expired
Luan ,
What ip address did you assigned to the cow ?
Can I dialin ? :)
This link was on the list before :
http://www.radcom-inc.com/acad/protocols.htm
It tells you how things look like .
It will NOT however tell you how to milk a cow .
flem
--- Luan Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
he moves and on what
ports it is 'moving' .
Next step is finding what/were this mac is .
flem
--- alex campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello ppl
> I have a cat 5500 with 12 ethernet cards and an RSM
> over the weekend I repatched the whole network and
> add
Nowadays DLSw or STUN .
Personally I would use STUN .
flem
> > Hi I would like too ask, if I can do this using
> Dlsw.
> >
> > We have ATM machine connected to the router via
> SDLC and the router on
> the other side is connected to the Tandem also via
>
utdown the ethernet interface on router1 .
Router0 will still laodbalance between the two routes.
Result that you loose every other ping .
If you shutdown the serial on router1 , then the ping
would still be 100% succesfull . Because the line
protocol will also go down at router0 .
flem
--- &q
Why do you think that using layer3 switching makes a
difference for your end systems ?
flem
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Guy how are you doing I have a question for you?
> I hope you can help
> My question to you is Layer 3 vlan. I fully
> understand setting up networks u
ethernet when you run into
this condition ? Get a sniffer trace and find out .
There is a condition on the ethernet that forces the
router t0 generate malloc failures .
flem
--- Zafar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am facing a very strange problem with my 2503
>
That is correct , in 11.2 it was called 'P' .
Avoid using T or P releases if you do not need the new
features .
flem
--- Kevin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "T" releases refer to "Technology" releases. In
> other words, new technology
> fe
any sense .
Can you check on the topology ?
flem
--- "Erick B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The DLSw local and remote peer IPs should be the IP
> address's of the interface where the users are, and
> that interface needs to part of the bridge-group
>
Yes , if you turn of routing on those interfaces .
We are looking at 'turning a router into a bridge' or
IRB or CRB . Re-think and avoid when possible .
flem
--- Nabil Fares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> is it possible to give two Fast Ethernet i
BridgingVDLC VDLC300
router#
flem
--- vtam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is possible to set serveral source-bridge
> ring-group in one router. So if
> i enable DLSw+, which ring-group is concern in
> dlsw+?
> Thanks.
>
>
> ___
in the cache .
If this is all good and still does not work --> play
around with the debugs and see if it all goes as
expected( debug dlsw ) .
If it is working , then still play around with the
debugs and see how a working connection looks like .
flem
--- Jairo Nuvan <[EMAIL PROT
ers hooked up on a hub(or MAU),
> and
> give them ip address in the same lan, say 1.1.1.1/8
> and 1.1.1.2/8, I can not ping one from one the other
> before put 'multiring ip ' under their interfaces?
not true , you can ping the rou
How you handle that has nothing to do with DLSw .
Floating statics are certainly an option .
flem
--- Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just make sure that the DLSw referneces the loopback
> addresses and that you
> are using something like eigrp. Put a default router
>
I have not read Laura's book but it is not good to
have TO MUCH of anything flying around :)
Netbios is packed in TCP/IP .
What is wrong with it ?
Why are you using it ? Answer this and you know if it
is good to have this traffic flying around .
--- vic_kanjana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If
cache .
The both caches have there own aging algorithme.
flem
--- nandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> As Erick says No-ip route cache will give no output
> when you do a show arp
> and cache contents cannot be viewed.
> The default setting is 4 hours if I am right
>
clock-rate makes no difference to the metric .
I cannot see why the bandwidth parameter cannot be
different on both neighbouring routers .
For one router in question only the outbound
interfaces to the destination are considered in the
calculation of the metric .
flem
--- Andrew Larkins
C ) Offer them a Martini on there way out :)
flem
--- Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate martini Howard.
>
> Anyway, I believe I mean the latency in the switch.
>
> It's kind of, what would be the fastest thing to do:
>
> A) Put a large o
HSRP will use a default group number if you don't
configure one .
Everything points to the switches , get the routers on
the same physical media and I will be very surprised
if your config would not work .
flem
--- David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have two 7505 ru
Useless Netbios traffic ???
All traffic serves a purpose :-)
flem
--- Trevor Corness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was not I, for I have yet to run a network with
> AppleTalk on it.. though, I
> did some sniffing on a contract, with 8 G4's on
> site, as well as about 45
MA/CD' in Cisco switches .
flem
--- woody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Further to my original post...
>
> It is possible to get collisions on a Full Duplex
> segment. Transmission
> from the switch towards the destination is a shared
> bandwidth domain (with
> o
led on the interface ?
Can you post a sh buff output ?
By the way 12.0.5 images are deferred for 3660 .
Use something else :)
flem
--- Tony Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our 4700 just failed and we just put a 3360 in
> service in its place. It has
> 12.05 of the IOS. Everyth
router#term leng ?
<0-512> Number of lines on screen (0 for no
pausing)
router#term leng
flem
--- eric dickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after telneting in i have one router that will not
> pause. when i do a show
> run the whole config just flies by witho
happens again I would open a TAC case .
While in rommon> get a stack dump , it is very usefull
info to attach to the problem ticket .
( if they not ask to upgrade to a more recent
IOS first :) )
flem
--- Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today after lunch I found my prima
keyword indicates an older version
than the one you are running it prints out this
message .
What puzzels me is that you just did the opposite :)
flem
--- Francis Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What puzzled me is that, when I have the basic IP
> configuration, there's n
ink of any suggestion at this point .
It is not a serious message , rather a warning .
Should not cause any harm .
--- Francis Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, Flem, I'm positive the error pops up there...
> :-)
>
> Well, I did exactly what you suggest and changed the
yep , best guess is that someone is telnetted in to
this c2600 and has the sh start in the --More--
position .
This will prevent you from writing to nvram .
flem
--- cisco cabanaboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone seen this before?
>
>
> C2600#wr mem
> Warning: At
to disable
fastswitching .
What is the serial number of your router ?
flem
--- Chandrakant chowgule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Guys ,
>
> I need some from you for following problem I am
> facing at one customer
> router . It is configured for point to point
Hi Darren ,
Do you have a reference on cco stating that cisco will
no longer support ISL in the future ?
thanks,
flem
--- Darren Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well the advantage is that I saw was that some
> switching modules are supported
> in 5.x that aren't sup
remote router you don't need a source-bridge
ring-group , so you can remove this entry .
Also change the spanning tree protocol to ieee instead
of dec .
On the Fep side , do a 'debug token event ' to see why
the router is not inserting . One reason could be a
ring mismatch .
flem
--
Darren ,
SupII has repeaters between the three busses .
SupIII has a bridge between the three busses , the
bridging functionality is implemented using the
Phoenix ASIC .
Both supII and supIII has a connection to all busses .
Also the 2926G is based on supIII .
flem
--- Darren Ward <[EM
The only limitation is the amount of vailable memory
in the router .
flem
--- "jun young,kwon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI all.
> This is jun young, kwon in korea.
> i want to know the maximum routing table entries
> that cisco 7513 and cisco
> 12012 can have.
t you do NOT
need to do the conversion yourself . Dlsw will take
care of this . If you are talking about translational
bridging or SDLC connections you do need to make the
conversion yourself .
flem
--- Joe Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MAC addresses are carried in non-canonical fo
Do you count 'dlsw local-peer' as a peer ?
Or , can do you only count 'dlsw remote-peer'
statements ?
The solution you describe below will not work .
Connectivity between routerA and routerC would fail .
( Ring-lists have nothing to do with 'peering' )
flem
0x2121 ;
means that you will end up in bootmode and that you
ignore NVRAM .
Did you enter 0x2121 or just 2121 ?
If you entered just 2121 change the baudrate to 4800 .
flem
--- Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have loaded a newer image on the box, but have
> also
Looking at the config register 0x2121 it is set for
9600 .
bit 11-12 matches 00 what supposed to be 9600 .
--- ElephantChild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Andrew Larkins wrote:
>
> > I have loaded a newer image on the box, but have
> also changed the config
> > register to
Oeps , I was completely wrong ;
The 3660 has bit 5 , 11 and 12 as console speed bits .
2121 matches 11 and 12 00
and 5 1
Which means 19200 .
flem
--- Flem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the config register 0x2121 it is set for
> 9600 .
>
> bi
92 matches
Mail list logo
