If you've used it before I'm curious about how it performed, how easy was it
to understand and configure, was it reliable, etc. It looks like a pretty
nifty product from what I can tell from their online demo, but looks can be
deceiving.
Thanks,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www
e it
will be second nature for you to subnet existing networks without
accidentally overlapping them.
HTH,
John
>>> Steven Aiello 9/9/03 12:03:06 PM >>>
I was stuck on the idea that you could ONLY re subnet a remaining piece
of a subnetwork. And not apply a mask to the whole span of th
il? ;-) You might want to
check out MRTG and WhatsUp Gold:
http://mrtg.hdl.com/mrtg.html
http://www.ipswitch.com/products/WhatsUp/index.html
HTH,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75089&t=75081
---
flow
control problem.
Regards,
John
>>> Johan Bornman 9/9/03 9:19:56 AM >>>
I don't get any response when configuring a 2500 series router (no key
strokes) through Hyper Terminal, 3 2500's doing the same thing. When I
restart the router by resetting it I can see the boot pr
Also remember that the blocked port isn't in a "down" state because it still
needs to listen to BPDUs to know when a topology change occurs. If it
didn't, it wouldn't know when it needs to transition to forward state, if
necessary.
Just my 0.02...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
Hmmm... Maybe it the fact that I forgot that the route needs to exist in the
route table to be redistributed.
If all intents and purposes, I will associate the application of new metrics
burden on the receiving protocol. I feel safe in that assumption.
Thanks for the clarification...
Message Po
I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been concentrating on
redistribution.
I have come across two statements in Doyle's V.1 that I am a bit confused
about. On page 698 under the Metric section, he states that a cost must be
assigned to each EIGRP route **BEFORE** passing it into OSPF and
at sort of random
line--often found in the subject line--and flag it as SPAM.
I haven't heard of a Bayesian filter before. I'm going to go find out more
about that right now.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74747&t=74740
-
>>>> John Neiberger 9/3/03 1:09:32 PM >>>
>I'm not very familiar with the 1721 routers and while I'm researching them
I
>wanted to get some opinions. Isn't the 1721 really just a baby 2600 with a
>slighly smaller processor and no network module slot?
Perhaps a config would be helpful. Or do you expect us to use our psychic
abilities to determine the problem? ;-)
>>> JMC Nel 9/3/03 12:29:06 PM >>>
Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial
TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I
27;s not like I'm trying to drive a
DS-3 with this thing. I'll need a T-1 connection, a low-speed serial
connection, and fast ethernet. Nothing too fancy.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74727&t=74727
---
e have any thoughts to fix this? Any router models
similar in price/function to the pix 501 that might not cause this
problem.
Thanks
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74527&t=74527
--
**Please sup
ks for any help
John
PIX Version 6.3(1)
!
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.75
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.76
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.77
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.78
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.79
!
access-list 90
ks for any help
John
PIX Version 6.3(1)
!
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.75
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.76
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.77
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.78
access-list 80 permit ip any host 192.168.1.79
!
access-list 90
are wired up to allow last number re-call or call-forwarding. If this is the
case, Port 0 on the VIC will assume you have a 2-line phone, and shutdown
port 1.
Hope this helps
John
""Maria"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GDay Everyone,
>
Larry just about designed my one also, so I recommend him as a vital
source of info. Its still going strong here.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Data Center Design [7:74126]
Are
CNA
No, this is not possible. They are entirely different platforms, not to
mention that the 2600 series is modular and the 2500 series mostly isn't. If
you want a 2600, you'll have to buy a 2600, unfortunately.
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
h
different nodes..
John
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
JoeT MCSE, CCNP
A CSU/DSU is a physical layer device. If you're using a WIC-1T the physical
layer of your local loop is T-1. In some cases the service provider will use
high speed DSL lines to get the service to you and then convert it to T-1,
but from your perspecti
they *knew* was faulty, and then get cheap smartnet for it so
they could get a working replacement. Cisco finally caught on to this and we
now have to get used equipment inspected before it can be covered.
I know, it sucks, but blame those who abused the SmartNet program. This is
their fault.
also would like to put down a quality of service map for known
business applications, and grant them priority over any other traffic.
Has any one done this and if so can you send snippets of your config or
link to doco's
Thanks all for your help
John
Sydney Aust
re IPv6 will
finally push IPv4 completely off the radar. Any guesses about how long we'll
be waiting for that day to come? Other than for the intellectual enjoyment
of it, is there any reason why Joe or Jane Engineer should really start
learning IPv6 right now?
Regards,
John
Message Posted
t to understand when explained
poorly.
John
""Pintens, Koen"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I agree with Dre
> I also got both books and Jeff Doyle's is so much easier to read and
> understand then Halabi's
>
> Koen Pinten
> Networ
loopback interface when you want an always up/up interface.
That's pretty simple.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exactly right. Sometimes it's nice to have a virtual interface whose
status
> is not tied directly to a physical inter
Fred,
You've been bitten by the "URL in the first line" problem. If the first line
in a post is a URL it sometimes gets munged. It's helpful to add some
padding at the beginning to get the URL off of the first line.
John
>>> Reimer, Fred 8/5/03 12:23:39 PM >&
Exactly right. Sometimes it's nice to have a virtual interface whose status
is not tied directly to a physical interface. We've mentioned several
configurations where this is the case. From the routers perspective it may
have a couple of special properties, since it's virtual, but it's still just
a
articular
console port then simply connect the octal cable and you're good to go. If
you need a straight cable for some reason then you will need an adapter to
roll the cable again.
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73665&t=73656
scription to CertificationZone, Howard has some wonderful
BGP tutorials that I referred to often when studying for the CCIE written
some time ago. [Disclaimer: I have done a minor amount of work for CZ.]
Oh, I almost for the BGP Command Reference by Cisco Press. Excellent book,
and well worth y
o that the local router knows that there is a /32 host
on that LAN that doesn't belong there. Redistribution into the routing
protocol allows the rest of the network to become aware of this host route.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Zsombor Papp"
To:
Sent: Friday, Au
route
in the routing table. Redistribute this into your routing protocol and you
have local and remote connectivity to this single host even though it is not
on the correct LAN subnet.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Viera"
To:
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:53 PM
S
Yes! Daniel mentions the RFC and Kevin Wigle mentioned APIPA, or Automatic
Private IP Addressing. You can find out more about that at:
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/A/APIPA.html
This means that Daniel and Kevin get to share the extra credit prize!
Thanks to all who participated,
John
ange to the router
interface to which this device is connected, and from that router, connect
(telnet or ssh) to that device, fix the ip, (get disconnected in process,
of
course), and remove the incorret secondary from the router...voila and
other
French words I don't understand.
""John N
Possibly, but you have to give more detail to win the prize. :-)
[Notice: there is no prize associated with this question. ]
>>> Jason Viera 8/1/03 2:22:32 PM >>>
Bill Gates leaving his mark on your network??
Jason
> [This isn't the usual type of follies question where you have to figure
>
ch unless you have the right topology Mobile IP?? Just a
guess! Need to take the edge off before my first lab attempt on Monday!!
Thanks for keeping us thinking!
Jason
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You have a device that is reachable only via teln
[This isn't the usual type of follies question where you have to figure
something out. In this case, you either know the answer or you don't. If you
don't, you can probably figure out how to look it up and it would be good
information to have in case you see this in your own network.]
Your network
You have a device that is reachable only via telnet or console that you've
preconfigured with an IP address, subnet mask, and default gateway and
subsequently shipped out to a remote location to be installed. Once the
device was in place you realized that you've configured it with the wrong
address
>>>> John Neiberger 7/31/03 5:02:31 PM >>>
>Here's an interesting troubleshooting issue for you to chew on. There is a
>fairly simple solution that may or may not be obvious at first. Heck, I
>might have missed an even simpler solution. This is for the
>begi
oblem when we upgraded
to a 6500, 2948G, 2980G, and 2950s.
I'll look around to see if I can find those references for you and I'll post
them if I'm successful.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73345&t=73195
--
be able to reach the router using the hostname as long as
there is at least one real interface up. If you were to resolve the name to
an actual interface address you wouldn't be able to reach the router at all
of that interface were down.
John
>>> Wilmes, Rusty 7/31/03 4:49:11 PM &g
ut
exactly which IP address is causing the conflict?
2. Hint: how might a device determine if its own IP address is in use?
Have fun!
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73323&t=73323
--
FAQ, list archives
sted if you're allowing TN3270 access to mainframe
applications.
Thanks,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73322&t=73253
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisc
nd their
>ssl vpn rocks!
That's one of the units I've been asked to look at. It looks good on paper.
What sorts of applications are you using it for? Are you doing much
telnet/TN3270 or SSH? How about LDAP authentication?
John
Message Posted at:
http://www
>>>> John Neiberger 7/31/03 10:36:14 AM >>>
>>You have a lot of options. I recommend Sprint first, then Level-3,
>>then GX. Unless you are already in bed with Qwest or AT&T, they
>>won't give you the time-of-day for support (and you are going
but we come back to the full-mesh issue. It would take over 5300
PVCs to create a full mesh with their L2 VPN. A full mesh isn't a
requirement, but it is a very nice feature of the Qwest PRN service and
given our network design and traffic flow, that is a great benefit.
John
Message Post
> ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message ...
> > bulk of their traffic. When considering a move to VoIP or expanded
> > video conferencing this can create some traffic shaping issues.
>
> For VoIP, you want to consider a control/data plane that makes this
&g
How does it compare with other vendors - Neoteris??
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73259&t=73253
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondis
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/30/03
4:36:57 PM >>>
>""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> All of those routers are EOL'd. They can't support them forever
(although
>> the non-XM 2600's surely didn't last too long)...
>
>
>well, this is one way to solve the proble
nal perspective but it also greatly reduces the
complexity of our router configuration. There are some operational
trade-offs but I think those are workable.
My feeling after spending a few days reading about this is that given a
moderately large hub-and-spoke network, a L3 VPN might be of more benef
lle. If any of you are
using these products would you care to comment on your impressions? Any pros
and cons regarding your chosen solution or product?
Many thanks,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73253&t=73253
-
I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general
and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a
2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly
obvious caveats already and I'm wondering what other caveats might await
that aren'
plex modes when
choosing manual settings. Many NICs will fall back to half duplex when they
detect a commanded mode link partner, and they usually don't give you any
indication that this has occurred!
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
ppose it could
simply be a matter of focus, and the CCNP is aimed at the enterprise
customer while CCIP seems to be aimed at the carrier or provider customers.
Any thoughts?
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7318
>By the way, FORTEZZA is used for more that "sensitive but unclassified"
>traffic. That's just one application. What you're probably looking for
is
>a product that falls in the "NSA Type 2" category. We can discuss more
>offline if you want to...
Out of curiosity, what is currently used for cla
so I might
be way off base. If I can find the documentation I'll take a look at it and
see if anything else comes to mind.
Regards,
John
>>> Jablonski, Michael 7/28/03 5:06:53 PM
>>>
Has anyone had any experience w/the following combination?
3640 & NM-1HSSI & Kentr
Howard C. Berkowitz 7/28/03 11:37:44 AM >>>
>Does anyone know if there's a FORTEZZA encryption product available,
>presumably third-party, for Cisco routers? It's a NSA-approved
>chipset, usually on PC card, for government "sensitive but
>unclassified" traffic. CCO search doesn't give any
Here you go:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/atip
x_c/ipx/2cdipx.htm
HTH,
John
>>> J B 7/28/03 11:35:43 AM >>>
I'm not really familiar with IPX and I have to connect 3 remote branches to
a central site where the Novell server
for this service. There
are still a few remote sites where we'd connect to some Juniper router but
Shasta's do the bulk of the work.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73106&t=73048
--
FA
hnologies involved and I'm not very familiar with the specifics and
the terminology.
I'll put in a plug here for Howard's book _Building Service Provider
Networks_. Among a number of things it discusses some of these VPN
technologies and has been very helpful the last couple of da
Those are great! But I think a few of them need to be translated for us
Americans. ;-)
>>> Mark E. Hayes 7/25/03 7:43:02 AM >>>
Thank you, I needed that!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dom
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:53 AM
To: [EMAI
You get three years to pass them all (Switch, Routing, Remote, Support) from
the time of your CCNA or from the time you take/pass your first of the four
CCNP tests, unless they chaged something since Dec 2002.
HTH's
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72994&t=72972
-
If there are multiple levels of Heaven and our final destination has been
predetermined in order to equalize the number of people in each level, would
this be considered pre-destination load-balancing?
>>> Priscilla Oppenheimer 7/24/03 1:24:34 PM >>>
Packets for a given source-destination pair are
ng interface for any given destination
so it's relying on the destination information only. CEF uses both the
source and destination. Multiple sources trying to reach the same
destination might not use the same outgoing interface.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
Not to mention hazard pay.
John
>>> Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/24/03
11:01:50 AM >>>
according to my source, this actually translates to appx 5500 USD. also -
you don't know the entire package - living expenses, housing etc
http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.cgi
This is reminiscent of the following vulnerability:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030709-swtcp.shtml
However, Stevo is running IOS, not CatOS. I wonder if there's a similar
problem with Cat4K IOS?
John
>>> MADMAN 7/24/03 10:11:26 AM >>>
Are yo
ems were due to this change in philosophy within Cisco
switches.
John
>>> "Reimer, Fred" 7/23/03 12:31:16 PM >>>
They don't happen to be autonegotiation issues, do they? Cisco used to
have
a nice write-up on autonegotiation troubleshooting and best practices
that
se symbols.
John
>>> Reimer, Fred 7/23/03 3:15:06 PM >>>
Man, someone remind me not to use the greater than and less than symbols on
this list! Apparently they are striped out as some type of evil HTML code
or something by the software...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporati
did figure out exactly what was going on. The
switch seemed to think it was suffering from a broadcast storm when it was
not. Rebooting to a new image cleared up the problem.
However, that led to the problem I'm discussing in the other thread! :-(
John
>>> Chuck Whose Road is Ever Sho
upgrade the NICs in all of those machines but that's
easier said than done consider the locations of these machines relative to
ours. :-)
John
>>> Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/23/03 1:35:37
PM >>>
lazy boy. upgrade your NIC drivers. :->
NIC problems with Cisco sw
ems were due to this change in philosophy within Cisco
switches.
John
>>> "Reimer, Fred" 7/23/03 12:31:16 PM >>>
They don't happen to be autonegotiation issues, do they? Cisco used to
have
a nice write-up on autonegotiation troubleshooting and best practices
that
hod for setting speed and duplex mentioned in the standard
is the use of autonegotiation. The behavior of NICs when auto is not
used is unspecified. There are basically two common behaviors among NICs
when you disable autonegotiation and the real problems occur when you
have a mix of NICs with diff
Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM >>>
>Hey All,
>
>I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can not
>ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however the
>only way I can connect to it is to ping it
I'm confused. Can you ping it or not? :-)
Message P
All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as I can
tell there are no reliable software versions for this switch that do not
suffer from connectivity bugs. We thought 12.1(13)EA1b solved our problems
so we started rolling out this version. Upon reloading we have a number of
hop on a plane and go to California. I *really* hope I don't mess
this thing up!
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72812&t=72799
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gro
starts to
cross the network. However, if this is for a production environment--or even
for lab study--I don't know that I'd spend much time on it. Find a different
way to do it! :-)
John
>>> Reimer, Fred 7/23/03 7:48:37 AM >>>
Oops, I was typing bridge? And it wasn&
ed at the moment to try it out, though.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Reimer, Fred"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:29 PM
Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72738]
> 12.2(15)T5 is a recommended version for the IP v4 exploit, as far as I
know,
> see
If I had a token, I'd ring it in the morning"
>
>And surely there must be a version of "Alice's Restaurant" sung by Cisco
>Sales.
"You can get any bug you want at the Chamber's Restaurant..."
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
alking
underneath ladders until I get this resolved!
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72746&t=72746
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
o and simply put, can R1'sLAN be also part of R2'sLAN?
If
>it's possible, how could the config be like?
>
>Best regards,
It's been a while since I played with configs like this but I believe you
could configure Integrated Routing and Bridging first, and then one
flection we decided that
we're not really any worse off than we are right now. We're already at the
mercy of the provider, and if they have people internally who are willing to
attempt to gain useful information from our network connections then we're
in trouble already.
John
xpensive compared to frame
relay. In fact, at the moment it's about twice the monthly cost, but we're
quickly growing to a point where the frame network is not going to support
our goals. This solution looks pretty slick, I must admit.
John
>>> Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
> for you:
> >
> >1. How do you like it so far?
> >2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
> migrat
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
> for you:
> >
> >1. How do you like it so far?
> >2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
> migrat
In addition to that, how many times have you heard that we should disable
CDP for security reasons? I'm sure there are some companies that aren't
allowed to run CDP for this reason. Then again, that's usually a big company
that probably wouldn't want to run ODR in the first p
are to what you were using before?
5. How many sites do you have? Is this solution scaling well for you?
Of course, it's not necessary to answer every question. I'm just doing some
research on their solution and thought I'd check around here for
references.
Thanks,
Jo
Thanks for the reply. I had a hunch, but wasn't sure...
Why not remove the command from the config mode if it can't be used in a
certian version? Go figure...
I guess it's off to more memory and get 12.2 IOS loaded. ;)
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
one tell me why I would get the error? I have tried this on a few
ports now and got the same error every time. I looked on the cisco site and
around deja, and found nothing about the error. Can any one provide some
help
John
I am trying to implement IS-IS for study on the first of three routers in my
home lab (3x 2501 routers) with IOS 11.1 and having some diffculty.
When I look at the configuration guide on Cisco's web site, the first
command that needs to be entered in config mode is "router isis". Usually
with all
r emotion.
Regarding your change of address, I'd prefer that you stick with the Cisco
address. There are a few participants that work for Cisco and we all
understand that they participate for personal reasons, not as official
representatives of Cisco. Besides, the last thing we need is more Y
g changes to critical production equipment even when you think
those changes are insignificant.
Of course, I'll continue to make what I think are insignificant changes but
I'm going to be a lot more careful in the future.
Let that be a lesson to yo
a new switch you need to return it with an RMA, or you can get a
replacement if you have it under contract.
HTH,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72572&t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscriptio
Oh man... Now Fred *and* Pete are on this list? What is happening to this
place?? :-)
It's good to see both of you here.
John
>>> Peter Benac 7/18/03 6:20:47 AM >>>
I am glad you are not representative of the current Cisco Culture.
Your attitude in this matter really
On Dec 7, 2:55pm, "Kazan, Naim" wrote:
}
} Cisco advised us of a new catastrophic bug CSCeb56052 within the new IOS.
I tried looking that one up and got an error saying that it
couldn't be displayed.
}-- End of excerpt from "Kazan, Naim"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/fo
Cisco has updated the advisory, to version 1.3, which includes a great
deal more detail regarding the vulnerability.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>It sounds like this is a hypothetical packet and situation that Cisco
>quality assurance discovered. I thought it was something already being
>explo
>>>> John Neiberger 7/17/03 12:12:42 PM >>>
>I accidentally deleted the posting about this but I wanted to make a
point.
>It's been said that a static route has an AD of 1 unless it points
directly
>out an interface, in which case it has an AD of 0. Sasa
me know where
my reasoning is incorrect.
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72495&t=72495
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misc
red."
>
>Thanks,
>
>Zsombor
Actually, I think I wrote that line and it is a little confusing, perhaps. I
took great care to be specific with my terminology but it's easy to slip
back into bad habits from time to time. Many people use terms in a haphazard
way (like redistribute, ad
Did you download the transition software? :-) Other than this odd problem
I haven't had any issues since the transition. I wasn't impressed with the
amount of time I spent waiting for support, though.
John
>>> annlee 7/16/03 3:38:55 PM >>>
begin vent--
I am hav
anyone using ODR
in a production environment? Are there any environments where ODR is
recommended over other options?
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72418&t=72380
--
FAQ, list archives, an
ing on the outside
is blocked by default. As has already been mentioned, ICMP has another set
of rules that need to be dealt with in addition to the usual rules.
John
>>> Wilmes, Rusty 7/16/03 11:31:51 AM >>>
I'd think that if it was an access list that it would either work o
That's very interesting, and it sounds like exactly what I was experiencing.
If it ever happens again I'll try harder to find the offending email to see
if this is the issue.
Many thanks,
John
>>>> Vijay Ramcharan 7/16/03 11:11:47 AM >>>
>I once had a simila
1 - 100 of 3480 matches
Mail list logo
