Do a sh ip nat trans. Are you seeing a quadrillion icmp translations
all sourcing a same host or few hosts?
Dave
Andrew Larkins wrote:
Try an access-list that denies ICMP and then use IP accounting access-
violations to see - more than likely a virus
-Original Message-
From:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 5:00 PM + 9/10/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Tim Champion wrote:
All the info relating to this book is good and I'm going to buy
on the back
of these reviews but... what makes people write switching
related poems?
Because if we don't laugh at
Larry Letterman wrote:
Not necessarily...you can also use point-point frame
With sub-interfaces...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
You must subinterface for p-p frame. The physical frame encapsulated
interface is multipoint.
Yes I know you can use the frame-relay interface dlci x
This may be of interest to some of you. We had been experiencing a
high number of failures of 3500XL switches, on customer in the last year
replaced 60+ 3500's, and we thought something was amiss. Got this info
recently:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn26174.shtml
Dave
--
David
NM-1CT1 terminates a PRI and obviously a channelized T1.
Dave
neil K wrote:
Can somebody explain when I can use WIC-1DSU-T1 over NM-1CT1 or what exactly
are the difference except that WIC-1DSU-T1 has a built-in DSU/CSU where as
NM-1CT1 is a T1 Module.
Thanks in advance.
neil
**Please
66 drops out of 153 billion bytes and since the counters have never
been cleared this number could have wrapped. I think if your worried
about this your network is running quite well;)
You can always make the queue a little larger but don't go overboard.
Dave
Pat Donlon wrote:
Hi All
Reimer, Fred wrote:
Think of it like this. Each switch is supposed to block redundant ports
leading to the root bridge. Say Switch1 and Switch2 are interlinked, and
also have downlink connections to the root bridge, like this:
Switch1 -- Switch2
| |
| |
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Reimer, Fred wrote:
Structured
Unstructured
Internal
External
What is a structured versus unstrucuted security threat?
There sure are a lot of unstructured ones going on right now. Anyone else
seeing a huge increase in pings? I guess it's the welchia virus.
look something like this:
interface ATM1/0
no ip address
atm scrambling cell-payload
atm framing cbitplcp
no atm ilmi-keepalive
!
interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
pvc madman 1/32
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5snap
Dave
How to find out
You first need to find out if your local teleco even sells it. I
don't think it is a business most providers are interested in.
Dave
Ryan Finnesey wrote:
How do you order dry copper?
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
johnman johnman wrote:
Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
johnman johnman wrote:
Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
try
http://store.yahoo.com/memx/routers.html
Dave
alaerte Vidali wrote:
Hi,
Having a hard time trying to find DRAM and Flash memory for 4500 and 4700
routers.
Any Idea ?
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list
Overruns are what they sound like, the receiver hardware can't hand
off the data fast enough. Is this interface really busy?
Dave
star star7 wrote:
i have problem with overrun errors in my fastethernet interface, how can
solve it
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the
Sleek wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know if it is possible to upgrade a 2500 series router to a
2600 series router and if it is possible I would also want to know the
required materials for upgrade.
Regards,
Osaz. CCNA
Yes. a P.O. or credit card should do the trick ;)
Dave
phyical connection/s fail!!! :)
Dave
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
SysDom Technologies
Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: 05 August 2003 19:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
You really don't expext 10M over the serial interface do you!?!?!
Dave
Tom Martin wrote:
Keep in mind that neither the 1601 or the 2509 are beefy routers. You
may be hitting a practical limitation. You may want to verify that CEF
is enabled (or at least fast switching if CEF isn't
Yes you can hot swap PA's in a 7200 but not in a 7500.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question, does anyone know off the top of their head if you can hot
swap cards in a 7206? Has anyone done it?
TIA
Patrick
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
Reimer, Fred wrote:
Gigastack is Cisco proprietary and not standard Gigabit Ethernet as far as
I
know.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Yes that is correct. In fact you can't configure the gigastack for
full duplex, or more correctly shouldn't as I learned the hard way some
time ago:( The new 3750
I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is
nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical
interface. As far as the routing process is concerned it's just another
interface. Don't know how to articulate it any further.
Dave
Robert Edmonds wrote:
You
Don't know what your refering to, (see earlier posts about inclusion
of posts your refererancing) but neither modes cut over in 2-5 seconds.
I have RPR+ configured on a native box and it takes roughly 40 seconds
and the hybrid switch is more in the 60 -90 second range if I recall.
Spanning
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Opinions on running Hybrid vs Native mode [7:73342]
Don't know what your
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Reimer, Fred
Cc: [EMAIL
Reimer, Fred wrote:
As far as I understand, the lab is not 2 days anymore. It is only one day.
And they don't break things and have you find and fix them. You just have
to configure the network correctly and answer some questions. You could
pass the lab by just reading books, but you'd have
What is it your trying to do, boot the MSFC from the sup slot0? If
so you can't from ROMMON. You must have a VLAN up and running or it
will not work. since you apparently have a boot image in bootflash
bring your MSFC up in the boot image, config up a VLAN and add you boot
variable pointing
when doing unnumbered interfaces
routing via loopbacks. Virtual templates, dialer interfaces etc...
I use loopbacks for many testing reasons.
load balancing and redundancy via BGP
use as peer in DLSW for redundancy/stability
generate routes
Those are a couple I can think of off
,
Blade 3 is bad. Open a TAC case, if you have support, and get the blade
replaced.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 6500 10/100 line card COIL numbering [7:73194]
Hi,
I have
FWIW, here is a current working config, 3640 to a Kentrox. If you
have the cable connected and the CSU powered you should get an up/down
state.
interface Hssi3/0
description to Qwest x
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
load-interval 30
serial restart-delay 0
Hi,
I have a customer whose 6500 switch seing this error:
%SYS-3-SYS_LCPERR3:Module 3: Coil 1 Port 7: stuck 3
Does anyone know if the COILs start with number 0 or 1? I know there
is 1 COIL per 12 ports and 1 Pinnacle ASIC per 4 COILs bt I can not find
anywhere how the COILs are
itself just fine!
Really bizarre...
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Neiberger wrote:
Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM
Hey All,
I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can
not
ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however
I boot my MSFC2 in the lab off of slot0 and it works fine!! Get a
console connection on the sup and do a switch con 15. Then do a
reload and see why it is failing.
If your MSFC is in the boot mode you do need to bring up an active
VLAN or you will never get the image off of the sup-slot0.
I'd save some money since I guess I wouldn't be able to buy any beer ;)
Dave
Ty King wrote:
I guess the cost of living must be really low...
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
Government can do something for the people only in proportion as
There is a reason many hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time
As far as I can tell there is no one definitive known reason but
several plausible reasons. I also understand some cultures like the
Chinese consider 13 lucky:)
Dave
Raj wrote:
Anybody knows when and how did the number 13 get so unpopular? Whats the
story behind it?
MADMAN wrote
John Neiberger wrote:
Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM
Hey All,
I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can not
ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however the
only way I can connect to it is to ping it
Are you sure you haven't used all your
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Daniel Cotts wrote:
Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
and RIP on the router then:
that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort
and RIP will
advertise that route to its
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Oscar wrote:
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
Packet
lots and lots of IOS versions are affected
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml
Thanks for the link. It's scary. Of course, with the proper
If router A anb B share an ethernet then sure HSRP was designed
exactly for this scenerio
Dave
Dain Deutschman wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if HSRP would be appropriate in the following scenario?
ROUTERA with T1 to corporate office
ROUTERB with IPSEC VPN to Corporate only used as a
Looks very similiar to the Friday funny I sent out a couple weeks ago :)
Dave, not having a funny day!!! :(
John Neiberger wrote:
Wait a second...isn't that a modifed version of the first Friday Funnies
that you posted??
Dom, did you start hitting the sauce a bit early? ;-)
John
Zsombor explained it pretty well but if you want more detail:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk831/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a62d9.shtml#express
Dave
Jans van Deventer wrote:
Does the CEF cache and Fast Switching cache reside in router memory? And
if so what makes
dre wrote:
KW S wrote in message ...
What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
1. Full routes
2. Partial routes
3. No routes
Well #3 means it doesn't work (you need at least a default route, or
0.0.0.0/0), so I'll skip that one...
Sure it works, you can configure
I assume you have OS somewhere on this box. If the OS is on
bootflash, from the ROMMON prompt try boot bootflash:filename You
should be able to verify a files existance by doing a dir bootflash:
Dave
Ron wrote:
I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boot
1. %SYS-3-SYS_LCPERR3:Module [dec]: Bus Asic #[dec] out of sync error
This message indicates a multiple-synchronization problem between the
bus ASIC and the port ASIC. The first [dec] is the module number. The
second [dec] is the ASIC number.
Recommended Action: Replace the module if the error
i have configured all three for differant requirements. There is no
benefit per se, it simply depends on the what your trying to accomplish
and how your connected.
Dave
Justin M. Morgenthaler wrote:
I would assume Convergence and the avoidance of this:
Zsombor Papp wrote:
At 10:21 PM 6/24/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi,
You can actually buy unidirectional PVC service? What do people do with
that?
Curious,
Zsombor
Yes you are correct that backing up the main interface will not help
if the remote side of the frame connection goes down, you will still be
up up to your local switch. since I think 10.2 or 3 you can backup the
subinterface, it recognizes the PVC being down and will initiate you
backup
The access-list will have no effect. Consider this. Can you seesion
to the MSFC when it has no configuration on it?
Dave
if somehow you do wedge yourself, the switch console x command is
your friend.
Dave
Dave C. wrote:
I have a MSFC on a 6509 that I am firing up for the first
That does sound odd. Are you saying that, without the static
default, in your routing table you have a gateway of last resort but it
doesn;t work unless you statically define it on the MSFC?
Dave
riposi alessandro wrote:
i have this topology into my POP:
two 6509( with MSFC2) which
Does anyone know if the supIV is going to support IPX ACL's anytime
in the near future???
Thanks
Dave
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people. --
Don't know what major is to you but here you will find them:
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cs/Services/rfc/index.html
Dave
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
thanks
-rbx10
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi, you have 2 DLCI's per
PVC, one on each end. In our frame network we using local addressing of
DLCI's, DLCI 16 could be on both ends of a PVC. Some carries use what
is called
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
OK, this is probably something simple, but my brain is done thinking
tonight. I'm getting a timeout when trying to copy a 6509 IOS image
(c6msfc2-jsv-mz.121-8a.E5) from the 6509 Supervisor Slot0: flash card to
the
MSFC2 bootflash: . I just copied the boot image
When it crashes are you generating a crashinfo file? do you see any
error messages, tracebacks, etc...
Dave
Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote:
Hi all, I don't normally have anything to actively contribute, so I just
lurk and learn. But, we have one now that may generate interesting
B's routing table and configuration.
That's what MADMAN was getting at. Also, he suggested you try a ping or
traceroute from Router A using Router A's IP address on its Ethernet side.
It will probably work then.
By default the router uses the IP address for the closest exit interface.
You can
Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single
ISP in
the same POP then no.
What would you do if they had been terminating at a single ISP in the
same POP? Or did you mean same router?
Most likely
)
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unable to copy from Sup-Slot0 [7:71038]
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
OK, this is probably something simple, but my brain is done thinking
tonight. I'm
Or we sell an LSS, LAN Switching Service, service in which you can
build a trunk across the bridged ATM network.
Dave
Tom Martin wrote:
Alaerte,
I can think of a couple ways to doing this. Be forewarned. Both are ugly.
Method #1: Relocate the servers /30 subnet
Never enough ;)
Dave
james kong wrote:
Just the same as the subject,anyone who know it please tell!Thank u!
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: MADMAN
To: Frederico Madeira
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Ping Problems [7:70980]
Really, interesting as more info is getting out!!
What happens if you trace from a host on the B LAN
This is way OT but some humor to end the week
P.S. I have nothing against consultants;)
A shepherd was herding his flock in a remote pasture when suddenly a
brand-new BMW advanced out of the dust cloud towards him. The
driver, a young man in a Broni suit, Gucci shoes, Ray Ban sunglasses
Frederico Madeira wrote:
Hellow,
i have a problem in conectivity of my two fr networks.
If i ping from any host on LAN1 to any host on LAN2 he works fine, but if i
ping from router1 to any host on LAN2, dont4t work.
I understand becouse in two cases the packet trought for same router in
. The problem occour in router. When i try to ping
in any host to another lan.
Frederico Madeira
Coordenador de Suporte
N. Landim Comircio Ltda
PABX: 81. 3497.3029
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: MADMAN
To: Frederico Madeira
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM
Then I would say what you did is appropiate. I assume these T1's
terminate on differant routers and your running EBGP between them.
I hope the Qwest link is stable :)
Dave
Mark E. Hayes wrote:
Yes the two T-1's were from Sprint and Qwest.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: number of CCIE [7:70151]
n The same was true of my 2-day
test, again, I had done everything on both days by mid-afternoon and I
just
sat around
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote:
Has anyone had problems save configs to a PCMCIA flash card on an RSP8? The
problem I'm having is that when I save a newer config over-top of the old
config with the same name, it creates 2 separate instances of the file. I
keep having to re-format or
If you are single homed there is no benefit running BGP but if your
dual homed, BGP can allow you to utilize the best path along with the
ability to dynamically announce your networks, influence incoming
traffic and all kinds of fun stuff.
Dave
Robert Perez wrote:
Could anyone explain the
Good point!!!
Dave
Zsombor Papp wrote:
ATA flash disks (disk0:, disk1:) work as you expected. Linear flash cards
(slot0:, slot1:, bootflash:) work (by design) as Geoff described.
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 02:21 PM 6/17/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote
To be honest about the only way to isolate these meltdowns is to
start disconnecting devices. I assume you have a general idea where the
problem is occuring. The flatter your network the more difficult I
might add!!
Dave
Christopher Dumais wrote:
Hi all,
We are having an STP problem
Your question is not very clear but OAM works fine and is quite
simple to configure:
interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
pvc madman 1/32
oam-pvc manage All,
Any idea about ATM links with end-to-end support for OAM cells
configuration
to detect remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've set up a Cisco 801 to dial into a Cisco 2600 with a E1/PRI card
installed, with 8 channels of ISDN available.
The idea being that the Cisco 801 (192.168.13.0/24) will dial into and
route
traffic to the 2600 (public range). I have successfully got the
and it has
been running fine ever since. I'm sure that's pretty rare nowadays but
it's
something to look out for.
John
MADMAN 6/16/03 8:42:00 AM
Your question is not very clear but OAM works fine and is quite
simple to configure:
interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.2
Yes all of them!! You want the WS-G5484, the SX GBIC, short haul
multimode.
Dave
Anibal Pita wrote:
Hi people
Somebody know if Cisco Switch 6XXX or 4XXX has a Cooper GBIC interface
to reach more 300 Meters ??
Thank guys
Hannibal P
=== WARNING IMPORTANTE
interface is indicative of the status of you connection
to the ATM switch. OAM allows for the status of the PVC.
Dave
thanks
Chuck
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your question is not very clear but OAM works fine and is quite
simple to configure:
interface ATM1/0.32
Sorry about the last reponse. Only after having hit send did I
realize the question said COPPER GBIC! :(
Anyway the SX would be what you want. I think 1000baseT is limited
to 100 meters.
dave
Anibal Pita wrote:
Hi people
Somebody know if Cisco Switch 6XXX or 4XXX has a Cooper
I would like to see you config also. Is this a full or fractional
T1? I don't see any error indications, you may simply be experiencing
short, large bursts of traffic hence the output drops.
Dave
Nate wrote:
guys, for some reason, our monitoring software is showing a bunch of
Anil Gupte wrote:
Do you have a route to x.x.x.x?
Is that not what I am doing with the statement
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x
Or do I need to do something more?
Incidentally, the router is not connected to anything
Therein lies your problem!! You won't see the default
Richard Kerschner wrote:
I asked the same question of Cisco on a Catalyst 5500. They did not
have a command to perform the function. I assume they do not have a
command on the 1900 either.
Thanks
Rich Kerschner, CCNA
Sr. Systems Administrator
Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc.
[EMAIL
What do you see in your log? How about a sh mem? If it is a memory
problem it is not the lack of flash that would cause this. If your not
on the console trying doing as a term mon and reissue the sh runn and
see if your getting errors.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have an
Not quite. 23 is the local ring, 9 is the remote ring and 3 is the
bridge connecting the two.
Dave
- jvd wrote:
The first bridge is 9, the ring is 3, and the next bridge is 23.
On the opposite side you will have:
source-bridge 23 3 9
Regards,
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network
My guess is that these counters are not incrementing and that at some
point in the past 41/2 weeks you may have experienced a problem. It
doesn't take long for the counters to increment.
Clear your counters and keep an eye on it if you suspect and WAN
problem. To answer your oringinal
Actually a debug isdn q931 would be more pertinent, 921 is your
conection to the switch whereas 931 is call setup. A debug dialer could
also be useful.
Dave
Andrew Larkins wrote:
as well as debu ppp multilink
-Original Message-
From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03
Contact you salesdude, hand him a check for $1995 minus your discount
and buy CD-3550-EMI!!!
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi group,
I just got a cisco 3550 smi switch, could someone let me know how to
upgrade the switch to emi ?
Thank you very much...
Philip
--
David Madland
You don't say what type of switch so I'll assume a 2900/3500
switchport mode multi
Dave
koh jef wrote:
hi ppl,
is there any way/s to configure mulitple VLANs in a single switch port?
thanks!!
regards,
jef
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
Need a lot more info than that, $5K might not be so bad after all,
the phone company needs to make a living too:)
Dave
J B wrote:
Hi, Everyone
I just been awarded the responsibility of installing 4 3745 Cisco routers.
The local phone company wanted $5500 dollars for the installation and
That's a good one! After saving the config do you see the changes
when you do a write term? What is the platform and the IOS?
Dave
Hitesh Arora wrote:
Dear All,
I need some expert comments from this group for my problem. The router is
in
working condition and 3 links are working fine
Yes it apparently will though you may want to consider using
access-lists:
pix520a# sh ver
Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3(1)
Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0(0)148
Compiled on Wed 19-Mar-03 11:49 by morlee
pix520a up 14 days 14 hours
Hardware: SE440BX2, 128 MB RAM, CPU Pentium II 350
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Bruce Enders wrote:
What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run
start
Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate write mem? I never learned those forms
of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years
ago,
Cisco said not to
the same as show run and he had an
issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes
to a config but show conf did not reflect those changes.
Or at least I think that's what happened. It's been a while.
John
MADMAN 5/30/03 1:34:27 PM
Priscilla Oppenheimer
the same as show run and he had an
issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes
to a config but show conf did not reflect those changes.
Or at least I think that's what happened. It's been a while.
John
MADMAN 5/30/03 1:34:27 PM
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Try different baud rates until the garbage becomes legible is my
guess. Your config-reg is likely changed though without a password it
is difficult to view.
Dave
Funnell Giles wrote:
Hi all,
I have just acquired a 3600 router. There seems to be a problem with the
console, whenever I
Need a lot more info than that, $5K might not be so bad after all,
the phone company needs to make a living too:)
Dave
J B wrote:
Hi, Everyone
I just been awarded the responsibility of installing 4 3745 Cisco routers.
The local phone company wanted $5500 dollars for the installation and
Plus
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me what IOS and whether it is IP or IP Plus I should be
running othe NM-4T1-IMA on a 2620?
Thanks,
Mario Puras
SoluNet Technical Support
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
Thanks, now how much of a cut do you want Larry!!
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
Call qwest and you'll get Dave out there...:)
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Thursday, May 29
The info is in the sotware feature navigator and the release notes.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with the software advisor is that it does not tell you if you
need IP or IP Plus or whatever else. I found out that I do need IP Plus
(IP
does not recognize the card) but it sure
ian williams wrote:
This has come up in the ccie written.
If I understand this subject correctly AUTO , sends out packets to try and
match the 2 devices up with regards to speed and duplex.
If your getting connection problems this would be a speed issue. If its
some
sort of packet loss/error
I have seen moe than once a faulty WIC-1DSU-T1 cause similiar
problems. Have you tried doing your own hardwire loop?
Dave
James Gosnold wrote:
Dear all,
I have something of a problem I hoped someone might offer some advice on.
We have a 1721 router at each end of a 128k leased line.
the dmarc.
Of coarse you may have to beat up the telco some more too as they ll
too often declare a line good after minimal and incomplete testing.
(see I'm not biased:)
Dave
MADMAN wrote:
I have seen moe than once a faulty WIC-1DSU-T1 cause similiar
problems. Have you tried doing
Abromov Nikolai wrote:
hi
first sorry for bad english,
Don't be sorry, your doing better than too many native English speakers!!
either of resons for this can be if anyone change a clockrate on modems
#1086;r another problem can be bad configur#1072;tion of encapsulation
on
alaerte Vidali wrote:
I read something that scared me on the url
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_white_paper09186a00800c8441.shtml
Should the MSFC fail, all Layer 2/3/4 functionality is lost
We are currently running Hybrid mode, and more than once the MSFC
The channels are not necessarily multilinked, try a sh ppp
multilink to see if they are bundled.
dave
James Gosnold wrote:
Actually, while I'm after some advice :-) another thing that confues me
about these ISDN 801 routers is that I have 2 x B channels up but I don't
have PPP multilink
1 - 100 of 1049 matches
Mail list logo
