Do a sh ip nat trans. Are you seeing a quadrillion icmp translations
all sourcing a same host or few hosts?
Dave
Andrew Larkins wrote:
> Try an access-list that denies ICMP and then use IP accounting access-
> violations to see - more than likely a virus
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> At 5:00 PM + 9/10/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
>>Tim Champion wrote:
>>
>>> All the info relating to this book is good and I'm going to buy
>>> on the back
>>> of these reviews but... what makes people write switching
>>> related poems?
>>
>>Because if w
This may be of interest to some of you. We had been experiencing a
high number of failures of 3500XL switches, on customer in the last year
replaced 60+ 3500's, and we thought something was amiss. Got this info
recently:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn26174.shtml
Dave
--
David Ma
Larry Letterman wrote:
>Not necessarily...you can also use point-point frame
>With sub-interfaces...
>
>
>Larry Letterman
>Cisco Systems
>
You must subinterface for p-p frame. The physical frame encapsulated
interface is multipoint.
Yes I know you can use the "frame-relay interface dlci x
NM-1CT1 terminates a PRI and obviously a channelized T1.
Dave
neil K wrote:
>Can somebody explain when I can use WIC-1DSU-T1 over NM-1CT1 or what exactly
>are the difference except that WIC-1DSU-T1 has a built-in DSU/CSU where as
>NM-1CT1 is a T1 Module.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>neil
>**Please
66 drops out of 153 billion bytes and since the counters have never
been cleared this number could have wrapped. I think if your worried
about this your network is running quite well;)
You can always make the queue a little larger but don't go overboard.
Dave
Pat Donlon wrote:
>Hi All
>
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>Think of it like this. Each switch is supposed to block redundant ports
>leading to the root bridge. Say Switch1 and Switch2 are interlinked, and
>also have downlink connections to the root bridge, like this:
>
>Switch1 -- Switch2
> | |
> |
e.
Lots of examples on CCO, might look something like this:
interface ATM1/0
no ip address
atm scrambling cell-payload
atm framing cbitplcp
no atm ilmi-keepalive
!
interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
pvc madman 1/32
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
>>Structured
>>Unstructured
>>Internal
>>External
>
>
> What is a structured versus unstrucuted security threat?
>
> There sure are a lot of "unstructured" ones going on right now. Anyone else
> seeing a huge increase in pings? I guess it's t
johnman johnman wrote:
> Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
>
> Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
> on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
johnman johnman wrote:
> Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
>
> Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
> on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
You first need to find out if your local teleco even sells it. I
don't think it is a business most providers are interested in.
Dave
Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> How do you order dry copper?
>
>
> Ryan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: M
Sleek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know if it is possible to upgrade a 2500 series router to a
> 2600 series router and if it is possible I would also want to know the
> required materials for upgrade.
>
> Regards,
>
> Osaz. CCNA
Yes. a P.O. or credit card should do the trick ;)
Overruns are what they sound like, the receiver hardware can't hand
off the data fast enough. Is this interface really busy?
Dave
star star7 wrote:
> i have problem with overrun errors in my fastethernet interface, how can
> solve it
> **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the Group
try
http://store.yahoo.com/memx/routers.html
Dave
alaerte Vidali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having a hard time trying to find DRAM and Flash memory for 4500 and 4700
> routers.
>
> Any Idea ?
> **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
> FAQ, li
Yes you can hot swap PA's in a 7200 but not in a 7500.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quick question, does anyone know off the top of their head if you can hot
> swap cards in a 7206? Has anyone done it?
>
> TIA
> Patrick
> **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
You really don't expext 10M over the serial interface do you!?!?!
Dave
Tom Martin wrote:
> Keep in mind that neither the 1601 or the 2509 are beefy routers. You
> may be hitting a practical limitation. You may want to verify that CEF
> is enabled (or at least fast switching if CEF isn't supp
t "get to" the router no matter how many loopbacks you have
if your phyical connection/s fail!!! :)
Dave
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dom Stocqueler
> SysDom Technologies
> Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PR
Reimer, Fred wrote:
> Gigastack is Cisco proprietary and not standard Gigabit Ethernet as far as
I
> know.
>
> Fred Reimer - CCNA
Yes that is correct. In fact you can't configure the gigastack for
full duplex, or more correctly shouldn't as I learned the hard way some
time ago:( The new 375
I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is
nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical
interface. As far as the routing process is concerned it's just another
interface. Don't know how to articulate it any further.
Dave
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> You ge
sion error has misdirected the email, please
> notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named
> recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
>
>
>
authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Don't know what your refering to, (see earlier posts about inclusion
of posts your refererancing) but neither modes cut over in 2-5 seconds.
I have RPR+ configured on a native box and it takes roughly 40 seconds
and the hybrid switch is more in the 60 -90 second range if I recall.
Spanning i
when doing unnumbered interfaces
routing via loopbacks. Virtual templates, dialer interfaces etc...
I use loopbacks for many testing reasons.
load balancing and redundancy via BGP
use as peer in DLSW for redundancy/stability
generate routes
Those are a couple I can think of off t
What is it your trying to do, boot the MSFC from the sup slot0? If
so you can't from ROMMON. You must have a VLAN up and running or it
will not work. since you apparently have a boot image in bootflash
bring your MSFC up in the boot image, config up a VLAN and add you boot
variable pointing
Reimer, Fred wrote:
> As far as I understand, the lab is not 2 days anymore. It is only one day.
> And they don't break things and have you find and fix them. You just have
> to configure the network correctly and answer some questions. You could
> pass the lab by just reading books, but you'd h
ave,
>
> Blade 3 is bad. Open a TAC case, if you have support, and get the blade
> replaced.
>
> Jim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 6500 10/100 line card
Hi,
I have a customer whose 6500 switch seing this error:
%SYS-3-SYS_LCPERR3:Module 3: Coil 1 Port 7: stuck 3
Does anyone know if the COILs start with number 0 or 1? I know there
is 1 COIL per 12 ports and 1 Pinnacle ASIC per 4 COILs bt I can not find
anywhere how the COILs are numbered
FWIW, here is a current working config, 3640 to a Kentrox. If you
have the cable connected and the CSU powered you should get an up/down
state.
interface Hssi3/0
description to Qwest x
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
load-interval 30
serial restart-delay 0
I'd save some money since I guess I wouldn't be able to buy any beer ;)
Dave
Ty King wrote:
> I guess the cost of living must be really low...
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as
I boot my MSFC2 in the lab off of slot0 and it works fine!! Get a
console connection on the sup and do a "switch con 15". Then do a
reload and see why it is failing.
If your MSFC is in the boot mode you do need to bring up an active
VLAN or you will never get the image off of the sup-slot0
device
> it can telnet itself just fine!
>
> Really bizarre...
>
> ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>John Neiberger wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM >>>
>>>>>>
&
John Neiberger wrote:
>Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM >>>
>>Hey All,
>>
>>I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can not
>>ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however the
>>only way I can connect to it is to ping it
Are you sure you have
As far as I can tell there is no one definitive known reason but
several plausible reasons. I also understand some cultures like the
Chinese consider 13 lucky:)
Dave
Raj wrote:
> Anybody knows when and how did the number 13 get so unpopular? Whats the
> story behind it?
>
>
There is a reason many hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
> This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
> noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
> is port 13?
>
> I'd bet money that at least 20% of the ti
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Oscar wrote:
>
>>Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
>>Packet
>>
>>lots and lots of IOS versions are affected
>>
>>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml
>>
>>
>
>
> Thanks for the link. It's scary. Of course,
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
>>Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
>>If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>>and RIP on the router then:
>>that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort
>>and RIP will
>>advertise that ro
If router A anb B share an ethernet then sure HSRP was designed
exactly for this scenerio
Dave
Dain Deutschman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if HSRP would be appropriate in the following scenario?
>
> ROUTERA with T1 to corporate office
>
> ROUTERB with IPSEC VPN to Corporate only used
Zsombor explained it pretty well but if you want more detail:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk831/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a62d9.shtml#express
Dave
Jans van Deventer wrote:
> Does the CEF cache and Fast Switching cache reside in router memory? And
> if so what make
Looks very similiar to the Friday funny I sent out a couple weeks ago :)
Dave, not having a funny day!!! :(
John Neiberger wrote:
> Wait a second...isn't that a modifed version of the first Friday Funnies
> that you posted??
>
> Dom, did you start hitting the sauce a bit early? ;-)
>
> Jo
dre wrote:
> ""KW S"" wrote in message ...
>
>>What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
>>1. Full routes
>>2. Partial routes
>>3. No routes
>
>
> Well #3 means it doesn't work (you need at least a default route, or
> 0.0.0.0/0), so I'll skip that one...
Sure it works,
i have configured all three for differant requirements. There is no
benefit per se, it simply depends on the what your trying to accomplish
and how your connected.
Dave
Justin M. Morgenthaler wrote:
> I would assume "Convergence" and the avoidance of this:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/pub
1. %SYS-3-SYS_LCPERR3:Module [dec]: Bus Asic #[dec] out of sync error
This message indicates a multiple-synchronization problem between the
bus ASIC and the port ASIC. The first [dec] is the module number. The
second [dec] is the ASIC number.
Recommended Action: Replace the module if the error
I assume you have OS somewhere on this box. If the OS is on
bootflash, from the ROMMON prompt try "boot bootflash:filename" You
should be able to verify a files existance by doing a "dir bootflash:"
Dave
Ron wrote:
> I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boo
That does sound odd. Are you saying that, without the static
default, in your routing table you have a gateway of last resort but it
doesn;t work unless you statically define it on the MSFC?
Dave
riposi alessandro wrote:
> i have this topology into my POP:
>
> two 6509( with MSFC2) whic
The access-list will have no effect. Consider this. Can you seesion
to the MSFC when it has no configuration on it?
Dave
if somehow you do wedge yourself, the switch console x command is
your friend.
Dave
Dave C. wrote:
> I have a MSFC on a 6509 that I am firing up for the first ti
Yes you are correct that backing up the main interface will not help
if the remote side of the frame connection goes down, you will still be
up up to your local switch. since I think 10.2 or 3 you can backup the
subinterface, it recognizes the PVC being down and will initiate you
backup though
Zsombor Papp wrote:
> At 10:21 PM 6/24/2003 +0000, MADMAN wrote:
>
>> The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
>> the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi,
>
>
> You can actually buy unidirectional PVC service? What do
The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi, you have 2 DLCI's per
PVC, one on each end. In our frame network we using local addressing of
DLCI's, DLCI 16 could be on both ends of a PVC. Some carries use what
is called g
Don't know what major is to you but here you will find them:
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cs/Services/rfc/index.html
Dave
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
> Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
> I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
> thanks
> -rbx10
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engin
it goes thru the hub site. The frame network would act like a LAN in
that respect provided you are fully meshed.
No free PVCs!!
Dave
Aaron Ajello wrote:
> This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a couple
> people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
>
> If I've got
Does anyone know if the supIV is going to support IPX ACL's anytime
in the near future???
Thanks
Dave
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people." -
t; N. Landim Comircio Ltda
> PABX: 81. 3497.3029
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "MADMAN"
> To: "Frederico Madeira"
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Ping Problems [7:70980]
>
>
Never enough ;)
Dave
james kong wrote:
> Just the same as the subject,anyone who know it please tell!Thank u!
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people
Or we sell an LSS, LAN Switching Service, service in which you can
build a trunk across the bridged ATM network.
Dave
Tom Martin wrote:
> Alaerte,
>
> I can think of a couple ways to doing this. Be forewarned. Both are ugly.
>
> Method #1: Relocate the servers /30 subnet
> -
.E5
> Loading slot0:c6msfc2-jsv-mz.121-8a.E5
> Loading slot0:c6msfc2-jsv-mz.121-8a.E5
> %Error opening sup-slot0:c6msfc2-jsv-mz.121-8a.E5 (Timed out)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL
Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single
ISP in
the same POP then no.
>>>
>>>
>>> What would you do if they had been terminating at a single ISP in the
>>> same POP? Or did you mean "s
gt;>
>>The source address on this packet from Router A was 172.1.2.1, guessing
>
> from
>
>>what else you have told us.
>>
>>
>>>L002>trace 10.60.60.8
>>> traceroute to 10.60.60.8(10.60.60.8) 30 hops max,40 bytes
>>>packet
>>&
When it crashes are you generating a crashinfo file? do you see any
error messages, tracebacks, etc...
Dave
Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote:
> Hi all, I don't normally have anything to actively contribute, so I just
> lurk and learn. But, we have one now that may generate interesting
> convers
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
> OK, this is probably something simple, but my brain is done thinking
> tonight. I'm getting a timeout when trying to copy a 6509 IOS image
> (c6msfc2-jsv-mz.121-8a.E5) from the 6509 Supervisor Slot0: flash card to
the
> MSFC2 bootflash: . I just copied the boot image (c6m
n no.
Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> MADMAN
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: number of CCIE [7:70151]
>
>
> n The same was true of m
Then I would say what you did is appropiate. I assume these T1's
terminate on differant routers and your running EBGP between them.
I hope the Qwest link is stable :)
Dave
Mark E. Hayes wrote:
> Yes the two T-1's were from Sprint and Qwest.
>
> -Original Message-
oblem isn4t in host. The problem occour in router. When i try to ping
> in any host to another lan.
>
> Frederico Madeira
> Coordenador de Suporte
> N. Landim Comircio Ltda
> PABX: 81. 3497.3029
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "M
Frederico Madeira wrote:
> Hellow,
>
> i have a problem in conectivity of my two fr networks.
>
> If i ping from any host on LAN1 to any host on LAN2 he works fine, but if i
> ping from router1 to any host on LAN2, dont4t work.
> I understand becouse in two cases the packet trought for same route
This is way OT but some humor to end the week
P.S. I have nothing against consultants;)
A shepherd was herding his flock in a remote pasture when suddenly a
brand-new BMW advanced out of the dust cloud towards him. The
driver, a young man in a Broni suit, Gucci shoes, Ray Ban sunglasses
n The same was true of my 2-day
> test, again, I had done everything on both days by mid-afternoon and I just
> sat around with nothing to do but check my work over and over again.
Hmm, when I took the lab you were done configuring at noon on the
second day at which time the liberty was taken
To be honest about the only way to isolate these meltdowns is to
start disconnecting devices. I assume you have a general idea where the
problem is occuring. The flatter your network the more difficult I
might add!!
Dave
Christopher Dumais wrote:
> Hi all,
> We are having an STP problem w
Good point!!!
Dave
Zsombor Papp wrote:
> ATA flash disks (disk0:, disk1:) work as you expected. Linear flash cards
> (slot0:, slot1:, bootflash:) work (by design) as Geoff described.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Zsombor
>
> At 02:21 PM 6/17/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
>
>&
If you are single homed there is no benefit running BGP but if your
dual homed, BGP can allow you to utilize the best path along with the
ability to dynamically announce your networks, influence incoming
traffic and all kinds of fun stuff.
Dave
Robert Perez wrote:
> Could anyone explain the
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote:
> Has anyone had problems save configs to a PCMCIA flash card on an RSP8? The
> problem I'm having is that when I save a newer config over-top of the old
> config with the same name, it creates 2 separate instances of the file. I
> keep having to re-format or
I would like to see you config also. Is this a full or fractional
T1? I don't see any error indications, you may simply be experiencing
short, large bursts of traffic hence the output drops.
Dave
Nate wrote:
> guys, for some reason, our monitoring software is showing a bunch of
> discar
Sorry about the last reponse. Only after having hit send did I
realize the question said COPPER GBIC! :(
Anyway the SX would be what you want. I think 1000baseT is limited
to 100 meters.
dave
Anibal Pita wrote:
> Hi people
>
> Somebody know if Cisco Switch 6XXX or 4XXX has a Coope
state
of the connection on the other side of the PVC.
The physical interface is indicative of the status of you connection
to the ATM switch. OAM allows for the status of the PVC.
Dave
>
> thanks
>
> Chuck
>
> ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
>
Yes all of them!! You want the WS-G5484, the SX GBIC, short haul
multimode.
Dave
Anibal Pita wrote:
> Hi people
>
> Somebody know if Cisco Switch 6XXX or 4XXX has a Cooper GBIC interface
> to reach more 300 Meters ??
>
> Thank guys
>
> Hannibal P
> === WARNING IMPO
roblem. I disabled OAM for that PVC and it has
> been running fine ever since. I'm sure that's pretty rare nowadays but
it's
> something to look out for.
>
> John
>
>
>>>>MADMAN 6/16/03 8:42:00 AM >>>
>>>
> Your question is not ve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've set up a Cisco 801 to dial into a Cisco 2600 with a E1/PRI card
> installed, with 8 channels of ISDN available.
>
> The idea being that the Cisco 801 (192.168.13.0/24) will dial into and
route
> traffic to the 2600 (public range). I have successfully got th
Your question is not very clear but OAM works fine and is quite
simple to configure:
interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
pvc madman 1/32
oam-pvc manage All,
> Any idea about ATM links with end-to-end support for OAM cells
configuration
> to detect
Richard Kerschner wrote:
> I asked the same question of Cisco on a Catalyst 5500. They did not
> have a command to perform the function. I assume they do not have a
> command on the 1900 either.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rich Kerschner, CCNA
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc.
Anil Gupte wrote:
>>Do you have a route to x.x.x.x?
>
>
> Is that not what I am doing with the statement
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x
>
> Or do I need to do something more?
>
> Incidentally, the router is not connected to anything
Therein lies your problem!! You won't see the defa
What do you see in your log? How about a sh mem? If it is a memory
problem it is not the lack of flash that would cause this. If your not
on the console trying doing as a "term mon" and reissue the sh runn and
see if your getting errors.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hav
My guess is that these counters are not incrementing and that at some
point in the past 4&1/2 weeks you may have experienced a problem. It
doesn't take long for the counters to increment.
Clear your counters and keep an eye on it if you suspect and WAN
problem. To answer your oringinal qes
Not quite. 23 is the local ring, 9 is the remote ring and 3 is the
bridge connecting the two.
Dave
- jvd wrote:
> The first bridge is 9, the ring is 3, and the next bridge is 23.
> On the opposite side you will have:
> source-bridge 23 3 9
>
> Regards,
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Netwo
Contact you salesdude, hand him a check for $1995 minus your discount
and buy CD-3550-EMI!!!
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I just got a cisco 3550 smi switch, could someone let me know how to
> upgrade the switch to emi ?
>
> Thank you very much...
>
>
> Philip
--
David M
Actually a debug isdn q931 would be more pertinent, 921 is your
conection to the switch whereas 931 is call setup. A debug dialer could
also be useful.
Dave
Andrew Larkins wrote:
> as well as debu ppp multilink
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03
You don't say what type of switch so I'll assume a 2900/3500
switchport mode multi
Dave
koh jef wrote:
> hi ppl,
>
> is there any way/s to configure mulitple VLANs in a single switch port?
>
> thanks!!
>
> regards,
>
> jef
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communi
Need a lot more info than that, $5K might not be so bad after all,
the phone company needs to make a living too:)
Dave
J B wrote:
> Hi, Everyone
> I just been awarded the responsibility of installing 4 3745 Cisco routers.
> The local phone company wanted $5500 dollars for the installation an
re that show config wasn't the same as show run and he had an
> issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes
> to a config but show conf did not reflect those changes.
>
> Or at least I think that's what happened. It's been a while.
re that show config wasn't the same as show run and he had an
> issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes
> to a config but show conf did not reflect those changes.
>
> Or at least I think that's what happened. It's been a while.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Bruce Enders wrote:
>
>>What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run
>>start
>
>
> Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate "write mem?" I never learned those forms
> of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years
ago,
> Cisco
Yes it apparently will though you may want to consider using
access-lists:
pix520a# sh ver
Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3(1)
Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0(0)148
Compiled on Wed 19-Mar-03 11:49 by morlee
pix520a up 14 days 14 hours
Hardware: SE440BX2, 128 MB RAM, CPU Pentium II 350 MH
That's a good one! After saving the config do you see the changes
when you do a write term? What is the platform and the IOS?
Dave
Hitesh Arora wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I need some expert comments from this group for my problem. The router is
in
> working condition and 3 links are working fi
The info is in the sotware feature navigator and the release notes.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem with the software advisor is that it does not tell you if you
> need IP or IP Plus or whatever else. I found out that I do need IP Plus
(IP
> does not recognize the card) but it sur
Thanks, now how much of a cut do you want Larry!!
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
> Call qwest and you'll get Dave out there...:)
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> Cisco Systems
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Plus
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone tell me what IOS and whether it is IP or IP Plus I should be
> running othe NM-4T1-IMA on a 2620?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mario Puras
> SoluNet Technical Support
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
Try different baud rates until the garbage becomes legible is my
guess. Your config-reg is likely changed though without a password it
is difficult to view.
Dave
Funnell Giles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just acquired a 3600 router. There seems to be a problem with the
> console, whenever
Need a lot more info than that, $5K might not be so bad after all,
the phone company needs to make a living too:)
Dave
J B wrote:
> Hi, Everyone
> I just been awarded the responsibility of installing 4 3745 Cisco routers.
> The local phone company wanted $5500 dollars for the installation an
ian williams wrote:
> This has come up in the ccie written.
> If I understand this subject correctly AUTO , sends out packets to try and
> match the 2 devices up with regards to speed and duplex.
> If your getting connection problems this would be a speed issue. If its
some
> sort of packet loss/er
Abromov Nikolai wrote:
> hi
>
>
> first sorry for bad english,
Don't be sorry, your doing better than too many native English speakers!!
>
>
> either of resons for this can be if anyone change a clockrate on modems
> оr another problem can be bad configurаtion of encapsulation
> on interf
ck jack try it or better yet
loop from the dmarc.
Of coarse you may have to beat up the telco some more too as they ll
too often declare a line good after minimal and incomplete testing.
(see I'm not biased:)
Dave
>
>
> MADMAN wrote:
>
>>I have seen moe than on
I have seen moe than once a faulty WIC-1DSU-T1 cause similiar
problems. Have you tried doing your own hardwire loop?
Dave
James Gosnold wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have something of a problem I hoped someone might offer some advice on.
>
> We have a 1721 router at each end of a 128k leased l
1 - 100 of 1084 matches
Mail list logo
