thesh,
>
> On the FRS 2.0 exam I took there were either 3 or 4 questions that were
> directly about the Cisco 700 series.
>
> steve
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: "martijn michiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "martijn michiel" <
thank u very much Mr. Joey
bye
ravee
"Fowler, Joey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl
Watch the wrap. You will need a CCO login. If you don't have one see
messages within the last day, someone listed how to get one.
Joey
-Original
.
- Original Message -
From: "whatshakin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 20 September, 2000 21:55
Subject: Re:
> Go to global config mode and type 'ip routing' on both routers.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: K
taint
that. As far as I have seen, judging by the failure rate among quite
competent colleagues of mine, the lab is still the lab.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: number of CC
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
>
> This constant blare of prejudicial bias in favor of "college
> ed" and to the
> definite disfavor of "certification" seems to come most
> intensely from your
> address. The undertext is always the same: "Go to college."
Woah, now there's something that completely came
hat percentage of the global population of "HR managers" do
they constitute? Do they, furthermore, qualify to judge either way? How
"expertly" knowledgable are they of the CCIE certification process? How
familiar are you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
>
> My friend NRF (what is your name anyhow?),
>
> Others have expressed concern, true, and most of them are
> legitimate. You
> mentioned that the MCSE was thought of as a means to get "easy
> money" from a
> relatively naive market faced with the new "IT" dimension.
>
>
-
From: "n rf"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
> Jack Nalbandian wrote:
> >
> > My friend NRF (what is your name anyhow?),
> >
> > Others have expressed concern, true, and most of them are
> > l
his thread, as there have been requests for
this to stop.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
>
> My fri
I've been trying to hold my tongue on this one since this firestorm comes
up at least once a quarterBUT:
NRF is correct. Attacking him and his motives fails to address the issue
at hand. Rightly, or wrongly, there is a slight devaluation of the CCIE
certification and it's not NRF's fault.
Kudos to Craig for a well thought out and written response. This is what
I wanted to
say but my temper got the better of me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Craig Columbus
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
ern
and balanced commentary on the matter, but mythology is all I read from his
angle. That is my observation, and you have not convinced me otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Craig Columbus
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:19 PM
To: [EMA
>Jack Nalbandian wrote:
Boy, for a guy who says that he wants to close the thread, you really have a
lot to say.
>
> 1. Attacking his motives and attacking his character are
> mutually exclusive
> endeavors. I attack his motive of defaming the certification
> process itself
> in a series of dif
-Original Message-
From: n rf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
>Jack Nalbandian wrote:
Boy, for a guy who says that he wants to close the thread, you really have a
lot to say.
>
> 1. A
STOP IT! Both of you! :-)
Shawn K.
P.S. This thread has been highly entertaining!
-Original Message-
From: n rf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
>Jack Nalbandian wrote:
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
STOP IT! Both of you! :-)
Shawn K.
P.S. This thread has been highly entertaining!
-Original Message-
From: n rf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: R
Steve Wilson wrote:
>
> Thank you gents,
> I have come to the conclusion that Jack and NRF is one and the
> same person.
> Anyone who has seen, or read, "Fight Club" will recognise the
> symptoms. Any
> minute now NRF will shoot himself through the mouth and end it
> all.
I think I really am goin
fairly.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Robertson, Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
This has been an entertaining thread, but the way I see it is this.
Maybe
the high/low
At 4:41 PM + 6/11/03, Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
>STOP IT! Both of you! :-)
>
>Shawn K.
>
>P.S. This thread has been highly entertaining!
>
What is the velocity of the sparrow, measured in CCIE units?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70544&t=70328
LOL! OK. I will only accuse you of blatant bias, if that feels better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Steve Wilson
Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: 11 June 2003 23:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
At 4:41 PM + 6/11/03, Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
>STOP IT! Both of you! :-)
>
>Shawn K.
>
>P.S. This thread has been highly entertaining!
>
What is the ve
Mark W. Odette II wrote:
>
> Robert, the way you described your hiring/screening process is
> the way I
> wished all Corporate America job providers did it.
>
> It's nice to know that at least one business out there doesn't
> hide
> behind an HR group that isn't prepared to perform the screening
Craig Columbus wrote:
> passing from October 2002 to present. The most recent number
> I've seen is
> 11757. Which, averages about 170 people per month.
> Extrapolating to
> October, the number of people passing from Oct 2002 to Oct 2003
> should turn
> out to be around 2044. My conclusion th
much as I hate to help keep this particular thread alive --- below
""n rf"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Craig Columbus wrote:
>
>
> > passing from October 2002 to present. The most recent number
> > I've seen is
> > 11757. Which, averages about 170 people per month.
> > Extrap
Look, guys, the bottom line is this. The fact is, it is more desirable to
have a lower-number ccie than it is to have a higher-number. I believe that
this is so because the test was more rigorous in the past than it is today,
but even if you don't believe this to be the case, you have to acknowle
LOL...I love people...they just crack me up!
hey Nabil... go look at Foundry Networks website. Cisco also had a paper or
two on MPLS. and I believe there's a draft RFC out on MPLS, too. (I hope you
have access to the Internet...) You're obviously a very intelligent person
(since you want to k
PROTECTED]>
Date:Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:19:33 -0200
Subject: Re: MPLS
These links are right ya know- this is far from being a Cisco technology.
We are all headed to MPLS classes next month & my boss (owner of the company
& lead CCIE) made a crack, wondering if Nortel might be teaching
hi
Tanx
How to achieve this CCSE and CCSI certifications?
regards
ravi kumar B.
Brian Dellong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh boy, where did you hear these terms. overheard
in office ?
well here you go...
CCSE Checkpoint certified systems engineer
CCNA Cisco certified network associate
CCSI cisc
I think you'll pick something up if you do some research yourself. I think a
clue from the title "Checkpoint Certified Systems Engineer" will lead me to
believe you'll find more information from Checkpoint's website.
Kenneth
Ravi Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
20001209050322.18188.qm
I guess he's talking about Cisco Certified Sales Expert
-Mensaje original-
De: Kenneth Lorenzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Sabado, 09 de Diciembre de 2000 02:00 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [Re: definitions]
I think you'll pick something up if y
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: cisco_study
I won't bite on that one, sailor boy. Suffice to say, you'll be
hearing from someone via official channels.
Searching for the best free email? Try MetaCrawler Mail, from the #1
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Carl Mirsky wrote:
> I would like some advice as to which resource(s) to use for the BCRAN exam.
> Has anyone used either the Cisco Press or Sybex book? Of course this would
> supplement hands-on and purveying the Cisco site.
ciscopress BCRAN is an excellent book.
Brian
Original message from:
"Pradeep Kumar"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>If you word the subject properly, it makes life easy.( >for > 1 people )
>Couldnt " Hyperterm Problem" be a better subject for >this than a " why"
>Why not !
Couldn't you have just answered the guys question? It makes life easy f
well, you can consider the GNS filter too,
the input sap and outsap filter will help sometime but no always
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: IPX
&g
I second you on that.
Boson has much better price, service and quality.
For $29.00 I get over 200 questions, answers, explanation why that answer is
the correct and in most cases, a link to where you can get more information.
And, their practice tests covers the whole range of Cisco certification
I think it is os 12.0. Authentication is RADIUS vis Vines. I can't answer
about frequency yet. However, I've been 6 months and this problem has occured
and been corrected the same way at least 4 times.
Thanks for your assistance. Petra Lynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What version of IOS are
Guys,
As Paul mentioned Please reply to The Jobs list .
"Paul Borghese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please forward all replies to the Jobs list. This is not appropriate for
the certification list.
Thanks,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
Thanks for all that have replied. One thing to mention that Charles was the
only one to mention that " ip ospf cost and ip ospf priority are interface
specific commands " Nothing drastic changes at Cisco Charles. It was just Me
and I (brain was hurting ) putting the config together on
Folks,
Thanks for all that have replied. One thing to mention that Charles was the
only one to mention that " ip ospf cost and ip ospf priority are interface
specific commands " Nothing drastic changes at Cisco Charles. It was just Me
and I (brain was hurting ) putting the config together on
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The email that you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did not reach the intended receipient due to existance of virus. Kindly
have your computer check for virus.
Best Regards,
Mail Administrator
Datacraft Asia Ltd
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c
/fcprt2/fcimages.htm#xtocid1196637
Takes hours...
Thomas
""CCNA"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
01c094b4$4f483410$0101a8c0@Ejaz1">news:01c094b4$4f483410$0101a8c0@Ejaz1...
> Thanks but how to download IO
Download an older and smaller version via xmodem. Then, when that's up you
can tftp the larger version and it won't take as long.
ramius
""Thomas Schaffner"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
968eou$jq0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:968eou$jq0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/c
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, nandit wrote:
> Hi Group,
> On my 2500 routers I am connecting to the console using the aux port and am
> able to access the CLI.However I am not able to get the same through console
> port.Where have I goofed?
look at the configuration of the console port on your router. D
Try to disable flow control in your terminal software...
- Original Message -
From: nandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 02:57
Subject: re router bootup
> Hi group,
> my cisco 2600 and 250
You can also monitor your Internet access point with a Network Associates
Sniffer Pro or some other packet capture and analysis device. If you setup
the monitoring device properly by inputting the TCP and UDP protocol numbers
and names, and to continue capturing after the packet buffer is full, t
A couple of more thoughts on the issue of ICMP redirects.
First, Edward Solomon had a pretty good concise analysis of the
options available in the environment you have and the
advantages and disadvantages to each:
> (1) Proxy ARP
> (2) ICMP Redirects
> (3) ICMP Router Discovery Protocol
> (4)
F LALL THIS GROUP FOR IT'S
GREAT PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT...LAWRENCE
>From: Jaeheon Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Jaeheon Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Passed CIT
>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:27:43 +0900
>Received
t; John Neiberger
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Password Utility
>
>
> http://www.alcrypto.co.uk/cisco/
>
> >>> "The.Rock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/19/01 9
OTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:19 AM
> To: Timothy Metz
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RE: Password Utility]
>
>
> Hi,
> I am interested, pleasen give more info
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Metz) wrote:
> There's also one for the p
Silvia,
It is possible if you configure the loopback as a point to point
network.
e.g.
int lo0
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
router ospf 1
network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
Requires IOS 11.3T or 12.0. Stops the loopback from being used
as the router ID
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Amit Gupta
Sent: 13 December 2000 11:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re : ISDN Backup
Hi All,
I am using the following config on my router.
router eigrp xxx
redistribute static
passive-interface BRI1/0
network x.
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Amit Gupta
> Sent: 13 December 2000 11:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re : ISDN Backup
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am using the following config on my router.
>
> router eigrp xx
se respond to Jim Barksdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Re : ISDN Backup
You do not have to use the BACKUP INTERFACE command, that is just another
way of doing
it. I like the floating static commands much better, I ca
time AND relevance
-Original Message-
From: Sblenda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:32 AM
To: Paul Borghese
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: Bye
Hello Paul,
Thursday, September 21, 2000, 8:37:21 PM, you wrote:
PB> I am open to suggestions as to
Yes, I support this.
You should look for the other Group for Recruitment.
Regards
MK
CCNA 2.0, MCSE, CNE
"Paul Borghese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not ever post a help wanted message to the certification group.
> We have a special group dedicated for such a purpose. Go to groupstudy.
iodic/period98/extreme0598.
htm
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/welcome/dsmsdn/rivard_qa.htm
Of course, I wasn't 100% satisfied that it was totally correct,
so I did a little bit more hunting and came up with the word
usage from Paul Maritz, an old timer from MS :-) He left me
with the i
> At 07:42 AM 10/12/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Actually, EIGRP is a hybrid protocol which means it is
distance vector and link-state.
>
> EIGRP is not a link-state protocol. It's an "advanced"
distance-vector protocol.
>
> Regarding the main question, I wouldn't think OSPF would need
> > At 07:42 AM 10/12/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >Actually, EIGRP is a hybrid protocol which means it is
>distance vector and link-state.
>>
>> EIGRP is not a link-state protocol. It's an "advanced"
>distance-vector protocol.
>>
>> Regarding the main question, I wouldn't think OSPF wo
At 01:29 AM 10/13/00, Paul Werner wrote:
>Here is
>what Dr. J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves had to say on, "Loop-Free
>Routing Using Diffusing Computations.":
>
>"A family of distributed algorithms for the dynamic computation
>of the shortest paths in a computer network or internet is
>presented, validate
> Here's what all these big words mean: It's a distance vector
algorithm.
> &;-) Nothing in there implies it's a link-state protocol.
Well yes, you are correct. I guess I (or Dr. Garcia-Luna-
Aceves) was not totally clear on this matter. In his published
article on, "Distributed, Scalable Ro
Why would anyone even reply to an individual who doesn't even understand the
certification??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If
> > you know of a
no not really.
what you will want to do is configure null interfaces on those routers tho...( i think)
1010 -- 10
0001 -- 16
-- 0
this is the third octet, and all the bits are the same up to 19.
so yes, your aggregation is correct. (i think)
- Peter (i think, therefore i am not
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:"Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Sat, 4 Nov 2000 20:58:41 -0800
CC:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Cisco memory
For obvious reasons I don't want to try this, but if you did erase the
flash, would RSL work?
I guess I actually SHOULD try t
I used Cisco Internetwork Design by Matthew Birkner (Cisco Press) and used
Boson practice tests. I passed with 87%.
I don't think I could have passed without the Boson practice tests.
A. Strobel
"Taylor, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -
>
I'm using the teltone ISDN demonstrator for CCNP and it work just fine.
Other's at my office are also using it for CCIE prep.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re : ISDN simulator
Some additional information is required here.
First, the maximum limit is 53K (US) imposed by the line voltage restriction
place upon telcos in the U.S. The speed reported is for only the instant it
was measured as the connection changes dynamically over lifetime of
connection. There can be onl
Thank you everyone who responded my original question
and gave useful URLs!
Regards
>From: Petra Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Jay Hennigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mari Misato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Modem question]
>Dat
with regards CIT 4.0; the new exam for the CCNP2.0 track is Support2.0 - i wish i had
known
that Support2.0 was actually a marginally revamped CIT4.0 as there was no beta exam
outline at the time of writing. its your call on which track you want to take, noting
the
recertification process i
on beta MCNS i got 2 casestudy with very basic associated questions, not as in depth
as
CCDA or CID. no fill-in blanks but many that listed posible answers choose most
correct with
no d) all of the above or e) none of the above.
PS: search MCNS thread for more (non)specific info.
Get your F
Thank you, I appreciate your help but I already knew that runt are
smaller packets than the normal size.
The fact is that I don't know why we observe runts frames and what are
they due to?
For information we use PoS (PPP) over the OC-12 link
Sylvain B (CCNA)
>runts are packets that are smal
Definitely an erroneous statement.
Regards
Atif
-Original Message-
From: David Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 9:48 PM
Subject: RE-Passive-interface
>Can anyone explain why, in this book
on; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE-Passive-interface
Definitely an erroneous statement.
Regards
Atif
-Original Message-
From: David Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 9:48 PM
Subject: RE-Passi
om: Atif Awan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:05 AM
> To: David Sanderson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE-Passive-interface
>
> Definitely an erroneous statement.
>
> Regards
> Atif
___
UPDATED Posting Gui
In a shared Ethernet environment, runt frames are almost always caused by
collisions. If the collision rate is high, refer to the problem "Excessive
collisions" below.
If runt frames occur when collisions are not high or in a switched Ethernet
environment, then they are the result of underruns or
You can use the dialer watch option which will look for the existence of a
route in the table. If the route is no longer there, the router will dial...
-Original Message-
From: "Jason Wydra"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:19:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [7:20291]
The demand circuit option also sets routing entries learned over the demand
interface with the DNA (do not age) bit set.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Wydra
To: Cisco Lover , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re:
I believe an OSPF demand circuit
Teresa,
Well, that's more information than was previously disclosed:-)
That sheds a totally different light on the matter.
Maybe it might be possible to retrace the steps for all of
this. First, was everything working okay at some time in the
past? At what point did something change or go
customer will check the stack of the switch and phone back
*** CASE LOG 24-AUG-2001 08:14:52 PSTAction Type: Resolution Summary ***
*p*
problem was introduced from a SUN that has been turned off
- Original Message -
From: Paul Werner
To: Teresa Presutto ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL
12.2(3) doesn't
help, tried =
> to use int e0/0 same behaviour.
> The switch is from lucent=20
>
> *** CASE LOG 24-AUG-2001 06:28:35 PSTAction Type: Action
***=20
> *p*
> i did a reload with no ip address and i got : Output queue
0/40, 0 =
> drops; input queue 201/200, 86371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: sh arp [7:17012]
Teresa,
You can't argue with getting a new router :-) I would call
that a giant leap in the direction of problem resolution.
If you are able to get a new router
e(minus any allocated to I/O). I did find
lots of bells and whistles in there.
If you haven't already done so, you may want to add the NBAR
entries for code Red since you now have 12.2(3) code(if you
haven't already done so).
v/r,
Paul Werner
> - Original Message -=2
Sun NIC cards.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Werner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 12:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Subject: Re: sh arp [7:17012]
>
>
> Teresa,
>
Comments within and below.
> Actually, you and I are not as much in disagreement as it
might seem at
> first.
> Unfortunately, the reality is that some RFCs don't track
industry
> practice. I would say 1812 is the definitive document, but I
would
> also agree this is largely by reference r
Comments within.
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, EA Louie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> LOL okay Paul... maybe you saw my earlier successful
post,
I m
> So remember to NOT include things that you may have completely forgotten,
> or are completely obsolete, when listing your skills.
>
> Examples: Arcnet, VMS, PDP-11, MS-DOS 3.3, X.25, Localtalk, LAT, XNS,
> Vines...
Hey!
I resemble that..
Vines is still a good cert on the resume up h
> > So remember to NOT include things that you may have completely forgotten,
>> or are completely obsolete, when listing your skills.
>>
>> Examples: Arcnet, VMS, PDP-11, MS-DOS 3.3, X.25, Localtalk, LAT, XNS,
>> Vines...
>
>
>Hey!
>
>I resemble that..
>
>Vines is still a good cert o
Hmmm, are you asking how often the process gets forked??
Chris Supino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By how often it goes out with other computers!
> Sorry, I couldn't resist :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Hi vikas,
Have u configured transport input all.
Regards
N.Anand
- Original Message --
Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:49:15 -0500
Subject: Re: Reverse telnet Problem
clear th
>
> - Original Message --
> Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From:Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:49:15 -0500
> Subject: Re: Reverse telnet Problem
>
> clear the line a few times.
>
> /
Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:07 PM 3/6/01, NetEng wrote:
> >Does HSRP work at the interface level or is the entire router on
> >acvtive/stand-by? In other words, if I have two routers working in HSRP
and
> >a link goes down somewhere down the line, will the first router
If you're not advertising the /16, then how exactly are you allowing your
inside hosts to access the Internet? If you're NATing, then wouldn't it make
sense to convert your inside network to private address space, and return the
/16 to the IANA/InterNIC for re-allocation to an o
LOL
sure, John... just post his/her email address to the group! We'll redefine
the word SPAM
Now, what was it you wanted to express to your boss? that you're overpaid???
;-)
"John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The interview with the hiring manager is more enlightening. His feeling
Are you kidding? I work for a bank. Unless they're a VP or above, I
guarantee you no one here is overpaid! :-)
Besides, I may be underpaid but I would like to keep my job for a
little while longer.
>>> "EA LOUIE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/16/01 9:31:32 AM >>>
LOL
sure, John... just post his/
"COULOMBE, TROY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /begin babble
> >>SNIPPED to save 2 packets @ 1500bytes each<<
My MTU is only 1470, so it would have cost me 4 packets ;-)
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
The solution of configurinh a specific dialer interface will waste an IP
address and a telephone number from my pool as it will be dedicated only for
that remote user. I think there is another solution if I can deal with the
remote user through its username or profile configured on the AS5300 Acce
I beleive your problem is WINS lookup.
Create a LMHOST file without any extension.
Write following line in your file
#PRE #DOM
Do not Include < > signs, Just replace the words.
DONT forget NO EXTENSION to file.
Save file in WINNT\SYSTEM32\Drivers\ETC directory.
You have to copy this file on eve
Does anybody know if a Altiga Client software will work with PIX? If it
does, Altiga client has options for WINS settings.
Sam
> I beleive your problem is WINS lookup.
> Create a LMHOST file without any extension.
> Write following line in your file
>
> #PRE #DOM
> Do not Include < > signs, Ju
Altiga VPN Client works with Pix 5.2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam Munzani
Sent: December 7, 2000 4:38 PM
To: Manishkumar Patel; Scott Morris; Jim Bond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: tough VPN question
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess the netmask for host A is wrongly given as 255.255.255.0 instead of
> 255.0.0.0
thats correct!
>
> S.Kalidasan
>
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Todd Plambeck wrote:
> >
> > > I do not see anything wrong with hostA pinging hostB. The only thing I
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, ElephantChild wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I guess the netmask for host A is wrongly given as 255.255.255.0 instead of
> > 255.0.0.0
>
> No. All addresses are in the same subnet whether you make it a /8 or a
> /24.
right, see my other post, I m
1 - 100 of 29311 matches
Mail list logo
