We'll smoke the codgers out now. Who knows the book that the below quote
comes from. Hint: The speaker is a pig.
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
>Why does the network on the other side of the routers need to be in the
>same VLAN? Why don't you make it a different VLAN and a different IP subnet?
>
>A VLAN is an IP subnet. Sure, Cisco and other vendors make it sound like
>VLANs are something more mysterious, but essentia
I beg to differ slightly on the concept of VLANS. A VLAN, as I'm sure you
know, is a broadcast domain and makes no assumption of nor has any
dependance upon layer three protocols. However, the difference in answers
between how to extend a protocol independent broadcast domain vs an IP
broa
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]
no. the 1750's do not support isl.
The new 1751's do not support isl either, but they do support dot1q.
Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice
Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
704-943-3615 - Phone
704-943-3660 - Fax
877-6-iR
Why does the network on the other side of the routers need to be in the
same VLAN? Why don't you make it a different VLAN and a different IP subnet?
A VLAN is an IP subnet. Sure, Cisco and other vendors make it sound like
VLANs are something more mysterious, but essentially, a VLAN is
Hello colleagues, I have a question regarding the configuration of the
routing device when a VLAN is separated by two or more routers. Do I have
to add an interface for the respective VLAN on every router ? Vlan 20
--> Router A --> Router B --> Router C --> Vlan 20 Do all three rout
The only real benefit of ISL was Per VLAN Spanning-tree, which has now been
incorporated into Cisco's rendition of 802.1q, and is also becoming a
standard, 802.1s or w, I believe. 802.1q is the way to go if you have any
non-Cisco gear in your environment, as ISL turns VLAN tagged frames
Ah, so I was incorrect in assuming that mayhem and chaos might ensue if
there were a native VLAN mismatch. I thought that traffic from one VLAN
might be mixed with traffic from the other VLAN. But if I understand
you correctly, they would never actually begin trunking in the first
place, right
Priscilla,
A native VLAN is the VLAN that a port functions under when its not trunking.
When the switch comes online one of the things it does is perform any
negotiations for trunking. In order to negotiate the two ports need to be
able to communicate at layer 2. If the ports at either end of
I haven't thought through the STP part yet, but the first section I
understand. In ISL, *all* frames are tagged. However, in 802.1q, the
native VLAN is not tagged. The switch (or router) must assume that all
untagged frames belong to the native VLAN.
If Switch A has VLAN1 as its native
out
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgvlans.htm#xtocid1196639
>
>for the details.
I'm trying to understand what that link is saying:
"Make sure the native VLAN for an 802.1Q trunk is the same on both ends of
the trunk link. If the nati
x27;t
apply anymore. And on the flip side, not all of Cisco's switches support
802.1Q (like the 1900 series switch).
-- Leigh Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sammi
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
On 23 Jul 2001 08:53:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Remmert Veen")
wrote:
>If not (so your network is all Cisco) you might wanna consider ISL.
Thanks, my network is indeed all Cisco.
If an environment is ISL, is it a safe assumption one would need to
redo all switches if you started to introduce
Hi Sammi,
Indeed, ISL is Cisco propietary, so should you consider other vendor's
switches in your network, now or in the future, I'd recommend 802.1q. Beware
however, dot1q has some drwabacks with regards to loops. Check out
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/s
I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup.
I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core
will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these
access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will
connect to other 2948s
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]
Can any one tell me if we can run the command "encapsulation ISL" on
ethernet port of 1750 router .
-Mamoor
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
You may want to verify the version of RIP that you're running on all
routers.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12067&t=11966
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]
Can any one tell me if we can run the command "encapsulation ISL" on
ethernet port of 1750 router .
-Mamoor
Mes
JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with Inter-Vlan routing on a Cat 5??? [7:11966]
Can you ping 193.1.1.10
> Can any one tell me if we can run the command "encapsulation ISL" on
> ethernet port of 1750 router .
Nope, you need a 1751 to do VLAN tagging. I'm not sure why this is,
honestly. I would assume that since the 1750 has a fast ethernet port,
the hardware ought to be cap
Mamoor,
To my knowledge, the only 1700 series router that supports IEEE 802.1Q VLAN
is the 1751. The fast ethernet interface may require the encapsulation
dot1q command, rather than the encapsulation isl command.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12030&
Can any one tell me if we can run the command "encapsulation ISL" on
ethernet port of 1750 router .
-Mamoor
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12024&t=12024
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
ap isl 1
> ip addr 192.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
> shut
> no shut
>
> f0/0.2
> encap isl 2
> ip addr 193.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
> shut
> no shut
>
> router rip
> netw 192.1.1.0
> netw 193.1.1.0
>
> On the Cat 5 :
> set vtp domain CCIE_LAB
> set vlan
addr 192.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
shut
no shut
f0/0.2
encap isl 2
ip addr 193.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
shut
no shut
router rip
netw 192.1.1.0
netw 193.1.1.0
On the Cat 5 :
set vtp domain CCIE_LAB
set vlan 2 2/9
set vlan 2
set trunk on 2/12
set int sc0 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
set ip route default 192.1
McCallum, Robert wrote:
>
> What about that good old DHCP. Has the workstation got a valid
> IP address
> for that subnet?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 July 2001 15:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Migratin
What about that good old DHCP. Has the workstation got a valid IP address
for that subnet?
-Original Message-
From: Sean Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2001 15:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migrating from routed network to VLAN network [7:11453]
I don't kn
Does vlan20 have an ip address assigned to it? Can the users ping their
default gateway?
>>> "Sean Graham" 07/09/01 10:48AM >>>
I don't know if anybody has any ideas. I am currently in the process of
migrating from a routed network where a 4500 is the core to
I don't know if anybody has any ideas. I am currently in the process of
migrating from a routed network where a 4500 is the core to a VLAN network
using a 3640, 5500 and 2900's. I am trying to make the migration as simple
and painless as possible by not having to everything in one hit.
Hi Rik,
Yes, PC2 is in vlan 40 called CISCO1 which I have defined on the Cat5. Looks
like I'll try to reload the cat5 and the router once again.
Or better still, delete the configs. and recreate them from scratch.
Anyone else, any ideas??
Thank you.
CN
>From: "Rik Guyler"
Hi Rik,
Yes, PC2 is in vlan 40 called CISCO1 which I have defined on the Cat5. Looks
like I'll try to reload the cat5 and the router once again.
Or better still, delete the configs. and recreate them from scratch.
Thank you.
>From: "Rik Guyler"
>Reply-To: "Rik Guyl
Post the conf of your router and cat to have more
visibility.
Claude-Vincent Perez
CCIE# 7419, CCNP, CCDP
--- cisco guru wrote:
> Hi,
> I am still not able to get inter-vlan routing b/w 2
> pc's connected to a Cat
> 5 switch and a 2620 router.
> Basically, I have 2 pc'
didn't say, but did you put the port PC2 is on in a different vlan
(whichever vlan the second sub-interface is in)? If PC2 is in vlan 1, this
won't work. Even though layer 2 will allow the ping, layer 3, where ping
operates, will fail because your PC addresses are in different layer 3
networ
Hi,
I am still not able to get inter-vlan routing b/w 2 pc's connected to a Cat
5 switch and a 2620 router.
Basically, I have 2 pc's connected to a Cat 5000, ip's, 30.1.1.30. def.
gwy. 30.1.1.100 and 40.1.1.10 and def. gwy. 40.1.1.100
The sc0 on the swich is 30.1.1.50 and def.
Hi,
Just got a Cat1924. Loaded the Enterprise ver. ios.
Did a show ver. and get the following:
1900/2820 Enterprise Edition Software
Ver. V9.00.04
etc. etc.
When I try to create vlans and enable vtp, it tells me unrecognized command.
I have successfully done this on a Cat 1912.
What could be a po
x27;s to go.
Anyhow, I've just purchased a 2948G-L3 and plan to use it to implement
VLAN architectures with a couple of Ethernet Channels of 200 Mbps.
Any recommended books for this specific goal?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
done on 4500/4700 routers with just
10mbps ethernet interface. Now you dont have to spend
tons of money just trying to learn vlan routing.
Cheers
--- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> That's exactly what I'm trying learn. I got my CCNP
> without learning it. ;-)
>
> But, I thou
Interesting! I didnt know you can do vlan routing on just ethernet
interfaces. I thought you would need a fast-ethernet interface for
that. But oh well, it's about time for Cisco to act smart. I know
Foundry iron family products support vlan routing even at 10mbps ethernet.
-Frank
O
Yes, I'm a happy camper when they came out with this
new feature. I don't have to spend like a gazillion
dollar just trying to buy a router with fast-ethernet
port that can do both vlan routing and multi layer
switching.
Regards,
Ofus
--- Frank Kim wrote:
> Interesting! I d
heap solution to
>learning 802.1q inter-vlan routing and multi-layer
>switching for your CCNP/CCIE. All you really need is
>a 4500 cisco series router with regular 10baseT
>ethernet ports.
>
>I have a few of these 4500m routers handy if anyone
>interested in getting them from me. Pl
Hey guys,
Check out the below url for a cheap solution to
learning 802.1q inter-vlan routing and multi-layer
switching for your CCNP/CCIE. All you really need is
a 4500 cisco series router with regular 10baseT
ethernet ports.
I have a few of these 4500m routers handy if anyone
interested in
Also, you need to keep in mind that it isn't the router itself that's in a
VLAN, etc. Its the individual interfaces or subinterfaces. You could have a
subinterface to every VLAN on one interface, a connection to your ISP on
another interface, and other connections going elsewher
traffic to
it's own VLAN, is only traffic to/from the internet would get intermingled
into the VLAN traffic anyway.
Mike W.
"Vijay Ramcharan" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks but not quite. I was just wondering about the actual pla
Thanks but not quite. I was just wondering about the actual placement
of the Internet router. Is it in it's own VLAN or is it part of another
VLAN with hosts, servers etc. In terms of security, wouldn't best
practice dictate that a router that is directly connected to the
In
You need a helper-address defined on all VLAN's where a DHCP server isn't
present.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Chang"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 1:06 PM
Subject: Help! VLAN & DHCP still g
I've been hacking away for quite a while now! Can anyone point to a sample
configuration file on the web with say 2 or more VLANs and one DHCP server?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9689&t=9689
--
FAQ, list archi
Vijay,
All you need is a default gateway on the router that points to the internet.
When an Internet destined packet from a workstation on a VLAN hits the
switch it gets dumped off on the router or MSFC since it doesn't have a
destination MAC address of a device on that VLAN. The router
default routes to the internet gateway & then NAT possibly?
- Original Message -
From: "Vijay Ramcharan"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: Internet traffic in a VLAN environment [7:9318]
> Could someone enlighten me on some of the best practi
Could someone enlighten me on some of the best practices for directing
traffic destined for the Internet from a VLAN based environment?
I mean, is it best to create a separate VLAN and direct all unknown
traffic out through that VLAN and then out to the Internet?
OR
Do you just choose one
Can you be more vague?
>From: "parky chan"
>Reply-To: "parky chan"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: VLAN [7:8921]
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:47:10 -0400
>
>Dear
>How to make a VLAN at my company
>my company has 100 PC
___
Dear
How to make a VLAN at my company
my company has 100 PC
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8921&t=8921
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mi
ld also bridge and make the box at the other
> end of the serial link
> the default gw for the boxes on that vlan.
>
> Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
> Network Engineer
> Planetary Networks
> 535 West 34th. Street
> New York, New York
> 10001
>
> Cell: +1(51
you need to route based on source, you NEED policy routing to do that.
you might look into ip unnumbered as well, as this would bind each serial
interface to the fe subinterface.
you could also bridge and make the box at the other end of the serial link
the default gw for the boxes on that vlan
Hi group,
I have a router set up with 3 channel groups on the
serial side, and 3 VLANs using 802.1q on the ethernet
side. I want to use RIP2 for routing.
How would I setup routing so that the traffic always
follow the same path between the serial and ethernet
back and forth.
ie, s0.1 always go
What are you using for inter V-lan routing?
On your router use the ip helper command.
Hope this helps
George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA
Cisco Systems
""Rich Chang"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any ideas on
Does anyone have any ideas on how to integrate DHCP with VLAN. For instance
if I have three switches, each switch supporting four VLANs 10, 20,30 and
40,on ports 2/1, 2/2, 2/3 and 2/4 respectively, how can i make sure the
proper DHCP broadcast/traffic is sent to each port? Is there a Cisco
No, the DR election process is dependent on broadcast domain, not area.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: multipal DR's for OSPF? One DR per VLAN? [7:8516]
If I issue the co
I believe it is one DR per area, per VLAN. The multiple subnets per VLAN
issue is moot as Cisco IOS OSPF will only form adjacencies with the primary
IP address/subnet, not secondaries.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8532&am
>>>
If I issue the command show ip ospf neighbors I see two DR's. One in
each
VLAN. Both VLAN's are in area 0. I was under the impression there could
only
be one DR for a area 0.
192.168.3.10 1 FULL/DROTHER00:00:34192.168.2.10
Vlan2
192.168.3.11 1 FU
If I issue the command show ip ospf neighbors I see two DR's. One in each
VLAN. Both VLAN's are in area 0. I was under the impression there could only
be one DR for a area 0.
192.168.3.10 1 FULL/DROTHER00:00:34192.168.2.10Vlan2
192.168.3.11 1 FULL/DROTHER
;The IP address for the Routers ethernet port are
>x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1. Similarly workstations in either
>subnet point to these addresses ( x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1
>) as their default gateways.
>I am having Cat 5509 and Cat 6609 ( With MSFC) with
>all the ports in the default VLAN1
KY:
Hello,
My replies are in line. But you should include an ASCII topology to give us
a better understanding of what you are trying to accomplish.
>From: "Amit Gupta"
>Reply-To: "Amit Gupta"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Help on VLAN configuration [7:8127]
gateways.
I am having Cat 5509 and Cat 6609 ( With MSFC) with
all the ports in the default VLAN1
I have the following queries on this :
Config on MSFC
Can the IP addresses of the vlan interfaces be any one
of the free IP address available on the LAN.
For eg x.x.1.3
What will be the default gateway
ot;>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
> otherwise? Answer is "it depends" ;->
>
> I have a question for you folks who use VLAN's extensively. Do you
establish
> membership by geography ( floors, parts of
We also use floors for separating VLANs.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jeff Bunch
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: generally,in a vlan,how many workstaions are in is better?
[7
We use Geography, One for each switch, two switches per floor. One at each
end
of floor.
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 06/07/01 10:21PM >>>
Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
otherwise? Answer is "it depends" ;->
I hav
Hello,
I'm not sure what you are trying to do but in a nutshell. The command line
on both 2980 and 6509 are the same. You create vlan in 2980 the way you
create a vlan in 6509. Which is "set vlan #", this would create a vlan in
the database. You might need to set your vtp b
goto the port that is connected to your router
telnet into switch and
set trunk (mod/port) (on/off/desirble/auto) (vlan`s) (type) e.g
set trunk 3/4 on 1-1005 isl
then on router ...
int E0.1
ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
isl X (whatever your vlan is)
no shut
HTH
steve
>From: "Mich
on the 6509, count your port placement on the physical connection to the
cable (i.e. shelf 2/ port 1 would be 2/1). Go to the enable mode & type
#Set VLAN ? As long as you know your cabling, the rest is pretty intuitive
from here. The switch writes everything to memory, so there is no Copy
I am trying to configure a VLAN between a 6509 and a 2980. I'm pretty
sure I can get the 2980 part done ok, but I have never used a 6509.
Could someone give me some proceedures on configuring this VLAN.
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=77
fore. The only
time I've used function as a vlan factor is for security issues, contractors
and the like that we provide only internet access for and block traffic to
our servers.
Regards
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
otherwise? Answer is "it depends" ;->
I have a question for you folks who use VLAN's extensively. Do you establish
membership by geography ( floors, parts of floors, buildings, etc ) or by
function (
Friday, June 08, 2001 4:21 AM
Subject: RE: generally,in a vlan,how many workstaions are in is better?
[7:7672]
> Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
> otherwise? Answer is "it depends" ;->
>
> I have a question for you folks who use VLAN&#x
50?100?200?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7660&t=7660
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot everyone I got. Config on RSM was not correct.
khramov wrote:
> What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7507&t=7367
--
FAQ, list ar
ssage-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
Still on a quest for a low-cost router that will run ISL and 802.1Q.
There's a used 2621 that I may be a
That would be a great router... It has lots of interfaces too!!! (BRI, 2
serial)... And lots of memory
On the 262x, you need IP PLUS, which is already on this router...
-Nate
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Still on a quest for a low-cost
Still on a quest for a low-cost router that will run ISL and 802.1Q.
There's a used 2621 that I may be able to get. Would it run ISL and 802.1Q
and how would I know? I know the hardware supports it. How about the
software?
Here's all I know about it:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Softwar
All,
Here's a quick follow-up to set us straight and to provide a link to the
information.
The Cisco 1751 is a new member of the Cisco 17XX series modular routers.
The 1751 now supports 802.1Q VLAN support. But does not seesm to support
ISL VLAN's according to the data sheet.
Be
Thanks for all of you replies:
Here is more details on what I am doing. I am new to VLAN so please patient
with me.
I have 5505 with RSM module. I config. VLAN xx on 5505, enabled the port on
5500 and
added route to the RSM database. Then I have a fiber run to 2900. On 2900
I enabled
f1/1 and
Hello,
Ok, you have an RSM which will do the inter-vlan routing for you. I don't
know what you have configure on the RSM but I'll show you here how and what
the config should look like:
Cat5000 w/ RSM gig1/1---islgig1/1 2900 xl
Cat5000 config:
set sc0 2 10.1.1.1 255.255.25
As a follow up, and minor correction - ISL is supported on the 17xx
platform, but if you want inter-vlan routing using 802.1Q, then at this
point in time one must still move up to the 26xx platform.
I suppose I should feel Cisco's pain, having to support as many feature
sets, version
, off, desirable, etc..),
encapsulation (dot1q or isl).
The big gotcha I ran across is making sure that both ports have the same
VLAN. After all, they have to be able to talk in order to be able to
negotiate the rest of the connection. It doesn't make sense since the
negotiation is all via layer 2
Thanks for all of you replies:
Here is more details on what I am doing. I am new to VLAN so please patient
with me.
I have 5505 with RSM module. I config. VLAN xx on 5505, enabled the port on
5500 and
added
route to the RSM database. Then I have a fiber run to 2900. On 2900 I
enabled f1/1 and
The requirements for connecting a router to a switch running multiple VLANs
have been posted to the list before do I won't go into great detail.
If VLAN 1 has an IP address on the switch then you need to set up an IP
address for whichever VLAN you want to act as the management VLAN and THEN
Hello,
On a Cat2900 the interface vlan 1 is what you call "management interface"
this is where you put an ip address if you want to manage the switch
remotely via telnet. It has nothing to do with vlan database. If you are
connecting a cat5K to a 2900XL, I assume that you are usi
>Network Architect
>VoIP Group
>iReadyWorld
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:31 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
Once again, I offer the following. Need a CCO login to use it, but it is
very helpful in discussions like this.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
According to the IOS feature navigator, ISL VLAN routing is now available on
the 17xx platform with IOS 12.2.1 releases.
I came
VLAN 1 is the standard VLAN all ethernet ports are placed in on a Catalyst
switch unlike other manufacturers who use VLAN 100 for 802.1q
implementations. The idea is that VLAN 1 will be used for management
(yeah.. sure..)
You do not have to have VLAN 1 intialized.. the only requirement is that
Hello,
You don't necessarily need vlan 1 on a switch. All the Cisco switch are
defaulted to vlan 1. It can be any vlan you wish. What is the goal that is
trying to be accomplished by shutting the vlan 1.
_
Get your
I've configure 2 VLAN on 5505 and it is connected to 2900.
In order for my VLANs to work I need to disable VLAN.
my commands:
config t
int vlan 1
shutdown
I thought that this would bring down administratively shut down vlan 1 but
it does not.
What am I doing wrong?
Alex Collins wrote:
You need VLAN 1 as a minimum for the switch to operate from my understanding
(I'm sure to be corrected if wrong). If you only have just one VLAN (which
will be VLAN1) the switch is a single broadcast domain anyway so you can
kinda ignore VLAN's entirely at that point.
What are you
I think it is,
set vlan 1 stat suspend
and to make it active back,
set vlan 1 stat active
may be i am wrong.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7369&t=7367
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
What is the command to shut down VLAN 1 on a switch?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7367&t=7367
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
I am configuring VLAN on 5505. When I run status shows that
it is not connected. I checked my cable run it seems fine and I checked
the config few times. Any ideas?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7341&am
Tim- I know you know this stuff, but what has changed ??? The CCO says
these routers will not do ISL or 1Q, up to IOS version 12.0T.
>From my CCO search yesterday:
CSCdm72054
IEEE 802.1Q (VLAN) and ISL are not supported on the Cisco 1720 or Cisco 1750
due to a hardware limitation in the 8
Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
Hi
There is a rumor that the 1750 with the right IOS version/feature-set
Priscilla,
I think the most reasonable and versatile choice would be a 2600. Keep in
mind that you need an IOS and Feature set release that supports both. I
think IOS 12.1(5)T supports both ISL/802.1q trunking and you have to use IP
PLUS feature set at a minimum.
MY .02 c,
Rob H.
CCNP+VOICE, CCD
ot;>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm studying inter-VLAN routing for a project. I have a few $$s to spend.
> What's a good low-end (low-cost) router that would do ISL? How about
802.1Q?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Priscilla
>
>
>
&
rom: John Hardman
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
> Hi
>
> There is a rumor that the 1750 with the right IOS version/feature-set will
> do both ISL and 1Q... These are the least expensive. Personally I would
call
As far as I know, the 2620 is the cheapest router out there with inter-vlan
routing capabilities. The 1700 series router also has fast ethernet, but
can't route between vlans.
You could probably pick up a 2620 from ebay for about $1000 if you got a
week or 2 to wait for a good deal.
501 - 600 of 980 matches
Mail list logo
