.9.9.48.1.1.1.6.1 = Gauge32: 16313376
$
the router's ios is c3660-js-mz.122-5d.bin.
Why I can't get ciscoMemoryPoolUtilization1Min ? From SNMP Object Navigator
,I know the ios support ciscoMemoryPoolMIB .Do I need any another config or
something ?
thanks for your help
Henry
Message
g Kirkness wrote:
> Subject pretty much says it all. Why is ppp encaps specified at the dialer
> interface as well as on the physical? Where are the LCP extensions
> available?
>
> Cheers
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea
Subject pretty much says it all. Why is ppp encaps specified at the dialer
interface as well as on the physical? Where are the LCP extensions
available?
Cheers
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72440&t=72440
--
er side.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: do you know why? [7:72352]
I'm not very familiar with the newer releases of PIX software, but do
you
have to enable ICMP on those interfa
Subject: RE: do you know why? [7:72352]
PIXes, at least with previous releases, are highly directional in nature
and
will apply a different set of rules depending on the origin of the
traffic.
For example, traffic originating on an 'inside' interface is subject to
far
fewer restriction
xlate. We were also losing NAT to arbitrary
> addresses on port 80. We rolled back to 6.1.4 (the latest GD and all is
> well).
>
> What version are you on?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:23 P
r not
work but NOT not work until you try it from the other side.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: do you know why? [7:72352]
I'm not very familiar with the newer releases of P
I'd think that if it was an access list that it would either work or not
work but NOT not work until you try it from the other side.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: do you kno
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: do you know why? [7:72352]
I'm not very familiar with the newer releases of PIX software, but do you
have to enable ICMP on those interfaces? It looks to me like you only have
ICMP allowed going one
m the
logs why it was blocked.
HTH,
John
- Original Message -
From: "Vajira Wijesinghe"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: do you know why? [7:72352]
> I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
> If any one of you have come across this pls let
: do you know why? [7:72352]
I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
If any one of you have come across this pls let me know the solution.
I have few servers at both sides of the PIX.
eg. Server-A at Outside zone and Server-B at Inside zone.
1. When I ping from Server-B to Server-A, I
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: do you know why? [7:72352]
I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
If any one of you have come across this pls let me know the solution.
I have few servers at both sides of the PIX.
eg. Server-A at Outside zone and Server-B at Inside zone.
1. When I ping
olled back to 6.1.4 (the latest GD and all is
>well).
>
>What version are you on?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:23 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: do you know why? [7:72352]
>
>
I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
If any one of you have come across this pls let me know the solution.
I have few servers at both sides of the PIX.
eg. Server-A at Outside zone and Server-B at Inside zone.
1. When I ping from Server-B to Server-A, I get request timeout.
2. Now
3com 4924 connected
> via 1000baseFX port which are saperated by 400 mtrs
> .Users connected to cisco2924 are not able to
> connect using FTP hoever they have http acess to the
> internet .Why is it
> I have 2 switches cisco2924 MXL 3com 4924 connected
> > via 1000baseFX port which are saperated by 400 mtrs
> > ..Users connected to cisco2924 are not able to
> > connect using FTP hoever they have http
port which are saperated by 400 mtrs
> ..Users connected to cisco2924 are not able to
> connect using FTP hoever they have http acess to the
> internet .Why is it so?
> Pls help.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Piyush shah.
>
>
>
Sounds strange! Are the users on the 2924 on a different subnet? Perhaps it
is related to permissions for those clients? Or the installation of the
Winsock Proxy client? Would the LAT be incorrect due to any changes on the
LAN?
Just some suggestions to throw at you...
James.
Message Posted at:
ftp.
I have 2 switches cisco2924 MXL 3com 4924 connected
via 1000baseFX port which are saperated by 400 mtrs
.Users connected to cisco2924 are not able to
connect using FTP hoever they have http acess to the
internet .Why is it so?
Pls help.
Thanks in advance.
Piyush shah
I got it.it's a bug CSCdv70284.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66583&t=66528
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
If I use sniffer to trace,there are not any ftp packet from router to my pc.
So I think maybe there are some problem on router when execute the command.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66541&t=66528
--
FAQ, list arch
26t02#copy ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin flash:
Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
problem is same
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66539&t=66528
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscri
try this command!
copy ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/c2500-i-l.113-11a.bin flash:
>I can upload IOS to ftp server,but I can't download
>26t02#copy flash:c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Address or name of remote host [10.18.6.7]?
>Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
>
Han,
Was it a typo error or...
Why do you want to load C2500 IOS to a C2600 router?
IOS doesn't let you do this.
The flash was formated for C2600 already!
Tu Do
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66531&t=66528
-
I can upload IOS to ftp server,but I can't download
26t02#copy flash:c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address or name of remote host [10.18.6.7]?
Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
Writing c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin
!
!!
Long and Winding Road"
>Reply-To: "The Long and Winding Road"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: BGP default-originate crashes the router everytime - Why??
>[7:66274]
>Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:47:25 GMT
>
>""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
&g
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
> Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it
> crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the
> same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers
have
> 16Fla
Hello,
Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it
crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the
same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers have
16Flash and 16Dram.
Anyone with a similar experience?
Thank you.
Sin
heaper :)
>
> d-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Elijah Savage
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why did Cisco do this? Off Topic [7:65834]
>
> Cisc
Elijah Savage
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why did Cisco do this? Off Topic [7:65834]
Cisco buys Linksys.
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
5141_1048177983.var&p=CSCO
--
"BSD is for people who love Uni
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cisco buys Linksys.
> >
> >
>
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
> 5141_1048177983.var&p=CSCO
> >
>
>
> Note that Cisco
: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: Why did Cisco do this? Off Topic [7:65834]
> why not?
>
> my boss came to me this morning prior to the announcement and thought they
> were going to say they were buying checkpoint!
>
> scott
>
> ""Elijah Savage
why not?
my boss came to me this morning prior to the announcement and thought they
were going to say they were buying checkpoint!
scott
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cisco buys Linksys.
>
>
http://www.quicken.com/investments/n
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cisco buys Linksys.
>
>
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
5141_1048177983.var&p=CSCO
>
Note that Cisco will continue with the Linksys name and operate the company
as a separate division.
Cisco
twork storage product
stuff.
just my $0.02
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2003 14:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why did Cisco do this? Off Topic [7:65834]
Cisco buys Linksys.
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsSto
Cisco buys Linksys.
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a5141_1048177983.var&p=CSCO
--
"BSD is for people who love Unix -
Linux is for people who hate Microsoft"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65834&t=65834
---
once they understand
what you're trying to do.
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: "Cisco Nuts"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:37 PM
Subject: Cannot see Rip routes with route-tagging - Why? [7:63900]
> Hello,I have R6, R5 and R4 running rip ver 2, network 17
Hello,I have R6, R5 and R4 running rip ver 2, network 178.1.10.0 subnetsR5,
R4 and R2 running eigrp 2 network 181.16.2.0 subnets.R5 and R4 had mutual
redistribution setup using route tagging.R6 correctly sees the eigrp
redistributed routes but R2 is NOT seeing any rip redistributed routes.
Any help
t the
switch and the routers and with hdlc encap, dialer profiles, floating
statics, backup intf's. work like a champ along with legacy ddr.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CN
>From: "Debbie Westall" >Reply-To: "Debbie Westall" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: I
I frequently have trouble when I go from hdlc to ppp. Usually it's
something I didn't configure with the ppp. I take one command out at a
time that I added until things come back up. I start with removing ppp
multilink.
also you may want to turn on some debugs
debug dialer
debug ppp negot
debug p
xed
it. I remember the debug and errors did not make it look like a ppp
authentication error.
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Cisco Nuts
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Isdn error with PPP -
For more information;
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html
regards
/Stuart
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: 18 February 2003 15:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Isdn error with PPP - Why always
try debug isdn q931, this may give you some more info.
Dave
Cisco Nuts wrote:
> Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap
> and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth
> chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopp
Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap
and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth
chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopped
working :-< This has been very frustrating!! It started spitting
out this msg.
ssage-
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why disable cdp for back-to-back serial connec [7:62798]
>
>
> Lawrence Law wrote:
> >
> > Dear Priscilla,
> &
Lawrence Law wrote:
>
> Dear Priscilla,
>
> Thank you for your clear explaination.
>
> May be it is better to disable cdp for low speed link, and
> security issue.
CDP uses very little bandwidth, so unless it's a really low-speed link, I
wouldn't turn it off for that reason. Regarding security,
Dear Priscilla,
Thank you for your clear explaination.
May be it is better to disable cdp for low speed link, and security issue.
Regards,
Lawrence
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) is a managment protocol
Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) is a managment protocol that allows routers
and switches to tell each other about their IOS version, hardware platform,
and basic config info. Some security experts say to disable it because it
tells too much.
It has nothing to do with bringing the serial interface u
Dear all,
From cisco configuration example
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk317/technologies_configuration_examp
le09186a00800944ff.shtml
I'm wondering that the line "no cdp enable" is required for both router
in order to make a serial connection up for back-to-back connection.
ing on the context... and the context is not clear from their
question...
Remaining questions and simulations were rather straightforward. If you
study all topics, this exam shouldn't be a problem.
Eric
- Original Message -
From:
To: "ericbrouwers"
Sent: Friday, Jan
Thanks, I understand it now.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "bergenpeak"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: Why is distribute-list in not supported in OSPF? [7:62247]
> I think the general ideas are as follows:
>
> - OSPF provides a mech
he smaller gear...
HTH, sorry for the misinformation earlier...
John
- Original Message -
From: "Cisco Nuts"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:46 AM
Subject: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!Why?? [7:62641]
> Hello,I am trying to u
Now we're talking!!
Thank you very much for your help, Mike.
>From: "Mike Bernico" >Reply-To: "Mike Bernico" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!Why??
[7:62648] >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:16:54 GMT &g
OTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!Why?? [7:62641]
Hello,I am trying to use a distribute-list out serial 1 in
isis...basically blocking an Ospf route from being leaked into the Isis
domain. It lets me type
At 03:46 PM 2/7/2003 +, Cisco Nuts wrote:
>Hello,I am trying to use a distribute-list out serial 1 in
>isis...basically blocking an Ospf route from being leaked into the Isis
>domain. It lets me type in the commands but when I do a show run, the
>commands are not there!!
Hello,I am trying to use a distribute-list out serial 1 in
isis...basically blocking an Ospf route from being leaked into the Isis
domain. It lets me type in the commands but when I do a show run, the
commands are not there!! Why??On the neighboring isis router, I do not
even get an option to
0 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why is distribute-list in not supported in OSPF? [7:62247]
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The "distribute-list access-list in [interface]" command is
> not supported in
> IS-IS and OSPF. Why???
>
> I tried to find an explanat
ommand "neighbor database-filter"
exists to do this.
ericbrouwers wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The "distribute-list access-list in [interface]" command is not supported
in
> IS-IS and OSPF. Why???
>
> I tried to find an explanation in Cisco's OSPF desi
Hello,
The "distribute-list access-list in [interface]" command is not supported in
IS-IS and OSPF. Why???
I tried to find an explanation in Cisco's OSPF design guide:
Filtering information with link-state protocols such as OSPF is a tricky
business. Distribute-list out works
Hello,I have R1 connected to R4 running Rip ver. 2R4 connected to R3
running Rip ver 1R4 to R2 and R2 to R3 running Ospf 1 R1R4R2
120.20.14.0/26
^
^
|
|
|
|
|
my routers.
Juan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Juntao
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why I can't assign an ip address to virtual-TokenR
[7:62014]
Cisco Internetwork Operating S
yes,I can assign an ip address on cisco2500,but I can't do it on Cisco2611XM.
I think,Perhaps the SRB use Loopback interface's ip to communication with
other Router,so can't assign an ip address on the router
Un
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62083&t=6201
okenRing22
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
ring-speed 16
!
.
""soft map"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi.
>
> Now I take a test,The test Router is Cisco2611XM,I was upgraded the
IOS.But
> why I can
Hi.
Now I take a test,The test Router is Cisco2611XM,I was upgraded the IOS.But
why I can't assign an ip address to virtual-TokenRing 0
test(config)#inter virtual-TokenRing 0
test(config-if)#ip add
test(config-if)#ip address 17
17:46:26: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-TokenRing0, ch
why ?
Anyone can tell me the reason.
I appreciate it.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61937&t=61937
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
Thanks, although I'm not sure I completely understand it now... I will
reread tomorrow.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "cebuano"
To: "'ericbrouwers'"
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:09 AM
Subject: RE: Why is OSPF E1 route preferred over E2 r
red, regardless of the internal cost to get to it.
E1s are useful when one might want to load share traffic to the exit
points. Each router computes the internal cost to each exit, and
takes the path to the closest based on internal cost.
ericbrouwers wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why is an
Hi,
Why is an E1 route preferred over an E2 route for the same destination?
The cost of an E1 route is the sum of the external reported cost and the
internal cost used to reach that destination.
The cost of an E2 route is always the external cost, irrespective of the
internal cost to reach that
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > At 3:53 PM + 1/3/03, Mr piyush shah wrote:
> > >
>snip some things>
> > >this question-answer forum . I thing we should stop
> > >it.There are lot many imp things on which we need to
> > >condcentrate more.
>
> And wha
But what I'm saying is that the higher you go, the harder
>slogging it gets. You need to do more and more things to compensate for
>that lack of a degree that higher up you go. This is why the higher up you
>look in any company, the higher the percentage of grads. By the way
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 3:53 PM + 1/3/03, Mr piyush shah wrote:
> >
> >
> >Dear all
> >I thing it is now a real high time someone should take
> >initiative in stopi
just stop happening after 10 minutes?
I don't think you'll ever know for sure what happened, unless you could
reproduce the problem, which you wouldn't want to do! :-)
Priscilla
Kenny Smith wrote:
>
> Thanks Priscilla, I understand what you mean now. That's why
> thos
At 3:53 PM + 1/3/03, Mr piyush shah wrote:
>
>
>Dear all
>I thing it is now a real high time someone should take
>initiative in stoping the subject of CCIE vs BS or MS
>degree. Why are we here for ? to discuss and share
>problems faced on networking front
All joking aside
Thanks Priscilla, I understand what you mean now. That's why those ports
which directly connected to PCs need to configured as spanning-tree portfast
to minimize the STP state change.
>From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>To: [
e STP to reconverge incessantly or
other problems. I wasn't there and I don't know your topology, so I can't
say for sure what happened.
Priscilla
>
>
> >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> >To: [EM
h has only one connection to my backbone switch. So
I don't understand how it will creat STP loop?
>From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: why this caused whole network hang? [7:60090]
>Date: Th
they fail to negotiate
> properly.
> Therefore, I tried to set the 5505 sw interface to 100 full
> dx. But
> immediately after I set, the whole company network hang. All
> users lost
> connection for more than 10 minutes.
>
> I really can't understand why?? The 2900 sw
.
Therefore, I tried to set the 5505 sw interface to 100 full dx. But
immediately after I set, the whole company network hang. All users lost
connection for more than 10 minutes.
I really can't understand why?? The 2900 sw has only one connection to the
5505 sw and both interface set to por
Many thx all for the comprehensive answers :)
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 December 2002 18:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: STP and CDP Ethernet Frames use 802.3 format - Why [7:59956]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the
> Ethernet_II format?
STP comes from IEEE as does 802.3. It would have been politically messy for
IEEE to ask the DIX consortium for an EtherType when they were busy
obsoleteing the DEC/Intel/X
At 12:14 PM + 12/30/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the Ethernet_II format?
>
>Many thx
>
Well, I can't say exactly why the developers did do it, but it's
reasonable to assume that newer protocols are being implemented
Don't use 7 on the password line.
You also need a 'login' command.
Line con 0
Password xxx
login
-Original Message-
From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: why con 0 password do
Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the Ethernet_II format?
Many thx
Ken Farrington
Global Networks, Barclays Capital, 5 The North Colonnade, Canary
Wharf, London, E14 4BB
* Tel
Don't use the "7", just hit
login
password
Richard Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi.. Dear Group,
>
> I would like to know why console password doesn't work. I key
> in my console
> password in the following manner. But when I plug in the
> console, it
Hi.. Dear Group,
I would like to know why console password doesn't work. I key in my console
password in the following manner. But when I plug in the console, it
straight away give me a switch> prompt. Why it never prompt me passord
before showing us switch>
line con 0
passwor
ssed)
>
> $$$$$$$$
>
>
> Besides, I found when I type sh flash on my switch there is no output.
> Why? What is the difference between sh flash and dir flash:
>
> Cat29-L8-7#sh flash
>^
> % I
discussion is all about.
Guys, great to hear your views on this. Really interesting stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 December 2002 23:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]
"[EMAIL PROT
cencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
>
> Why was EIGRP designed this way?
>
I don't know why, but I do know Cisco is revisiting that decision.
At Networkers 2002 Alvaro described an enhancement "on the drawing board"
called reliable three-way handshake. Backwa
; can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
>>
>> OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
>>
>> Why was EIGRP designed this way?
>
>Simplicity?? Less network traffic?
>
>But I question your premise. EIGRP wouldn't sen
I don't know if you will ever receive the answer to "why". There is a
discussion of EIGRP vs OSPF in the Cisco Press book "EIGRP Network Design
Solutions" by Ivan Pepelnjak. ISBN 1578701651
See page 109.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
acencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
>
> Why was EIGRP designed this way?
Simplicity?? Less network traffic?
But I question your premise. EIGRP wouldn't send to a neighbor that wasn't
feasible, would it? Is EIGRP really more susceptible to black holes than
OSPF? M
have more than one error. So the
sum doesn't always work out.
Runts, collisions, and CRC errors that result from collisions are all normal
in shared (half dupex) Ethernet, especially under high traffic conditions.
The real question to figure out is why your Gigabit Ethernet ports are
running
As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to keep
a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link., this
can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
Why was EIGRP designe
new 4006s
(version
> 12.1(8a)EW1) and 3640 routers. First of all what exactly are output and
> input errors (please give more than what it says on the Cisco site) and why
> are they caused? How do I fix them or do I need to???
>
> Here is the "show int" between the Cat4K and
The "show int" is on the 4006 ports NOT the 3640.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59172&t=59172
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondiscl
I am getting many output and input errors between 2 brand new 4006s (version
12.1(8a)EW1) and 3640 routers. First of all what exactly are output and
input errors (please give more than what it says on the Cisco site) and why
are they caused? How do I fix them or do I need to???
Here is the
21 to 192.168.3.101 on interface
outside
I think PIX IDS is really not that good
Thanks and Regards
Kenny
>From: "Juli Hato"
>Reply-To: "Juli Hato"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Why PIX's IDS can't detect a port scan? [7:59052]
>Date: Thu, 12 Dec
rage http://www.digitalrage.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why PIX's IDS can't detect a port scan? [7:59052]
Hi,
Could you indicate some free ones for Un
Hi,
Could you indicate some free ones for Unix Solaris ?
Alaerte
"Delian Delchev" @groupstudy.com em 12/12/2002 13:46:02
Favor responder a "Delian Delchev"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:RE: Why PIX's IDS can'
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why PIX's IDS can't detect a port scan? [7:59052]
Hi Hato,
Could you recommend an IDS ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59094&t=59052
--
FAQ, list archives
1 - 100 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
