You'd need to install in the Enterprise/Developer Multiserver mode of
deployment, in order to deploy a WAR-based app (like OpenCMS) alongside CF.
Even then, it wouldn't really be running "in CF". It would be using JRun as
the J2EE server on which it executes. (And no, as far as I know, one cannot
d
Forest, it generally does not matter at all that you have many versions of
the JRE or JDK. Most apps that need a particular one will include one within
their own directory, as both CF and JRun (and I imagine Tomcat) do.
And they also tend to set their own classpath within their startup scripts,
s
Sure, happy to help.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Forrest C.
Gilmore
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 1:19 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] OpenCMS Installation
Charlie:
I realized I was straying from CF top
Ajas, this seems a good time to make a suggestion: sometimes, trying to
solve a challenging problem on a mailing list just isn't productive.
There can be too many variables, and many hours are spent as different
people throw out different suggestions, and you and they work to get to the
point
Thanks, Ajas.
I do realize it seemed a possibly simple problem at first, but as the many
comments have shown, there are many possible explanations, but they do all
center on the matter of client variables.
Indeed, I was tempted to write more yesterday to give you some direction,
and in fa
I'll throw out that if you had FusionReactor or SeeFusion, you could enable
their datasource monitoring feature to be able to see each SQL statement
sent to the DBMS, which may also have helped you see when/where the problem
was (and was not) occurring, since it may be that it happens sometimes and
Clarke, besides considering the other useful suggestions about whether it’s
appropriate to even try those, or if there may be alternatives, I’ll say that
I’ve done it before for other reasons, with code like this (where string was
what needed to be encrypted, and key was the key for encoding/dec
Oy, so much palaver. Their very numbers show CF as having 30% more jobs than
their self-ascribed "language of the moment" Rails, and yet they still want
to label CF as dying.
Indeed, one could argue static numbers aren't a good measure. Trends are
what matter, and if they showed that CF was t
Hey folks, since we're not having a regular CFUG meeting in June (first
Wednesday), due to the "Ben" meeting on the 8th (more at ACFUG.org), here's
a great way to spend that night.
Our own Dean Saxe is presenting to the OWASP Atlanta group that now-free
Wednesday night, June 3. For more on his
Well, there's one other difference: both the CFARGUMENT's have "required"
and "default". If you think about it, these are mutually exclusive. If you
must specify an arg, then there's no need for a default. Of course, it's CF
that shouldn't allow them, and I don't know that they should result in the
So are you saying that in fact things are ok, if you don't use that tool?
And as far as tools to analyze web services, there are those built into
Dreamweaver and Eclipse (with the Adobe CF Extensions). Have you tried
either of those? Each of these can explore any web service URL you provide,
and s
Clarke, I wouldn't rely on the server monitor as proof of whether the thread
runs. For one thing, you have to have "start monitoring" enabled, which
isn't on by default. Just thought I'd clarify that if it might be the only
reason you don't see them. Even then, the threads could run very fast.
But to get back to your original question, if someone for some reason did
NOT want to do an update, yes, you could call upon better encryption
functions than those includes in CF 6, by calling on them in the underlying
Java JVM (or whatever library the encryption functions live in). Someone may
kno
Ajas, I'll share my thoughts. I'm no expert in this subject, and things may
have changed, so someone can counter my observations.
First, the latter problem (of how files/pages opened via the browser open in
an unexpected program) is normally a matter of configuring the browser to
tell it how to
Yes, and for that, Mischa's idea was a clever solution to consider.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:05 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: CF 7 & tif images
Thanks Mischa and Charl
Following up on that, note that you can also control where the tag
(CFTEXTAREA) expects to find the editor code. It only defaults to
/CFIDE/scripts/ajax/FCKEditor. You can change it on the fly in the tag,
using the basetag attribute. More at:
http://www.cfquickdocs.com/cf8/#cftextarea
Of course,
Sravan, CF will only create a new cfid/cftoken if they are not passed into a
request, whether via a cookie pair or on the URL (or in a form field, I
suppose). Whatever that other server's technology is for sending a request,
see if they're passing the data any of these ways.
You can also check
.because you would instead need to be sending the jsessionid cookie instead.
I was about to write the same answer as Cameron, but adding that little
detail. ;--}
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Cameron
Childress
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:22 PM
I saw your later note saying you're sending those session keys as URL parms.
Since you say things are failing on posts, how about getting the posting app
to try sending them as cookies instead? Maybe some aspect of the http spec
(or the web server) is not letting query strings in on form posts. Jus
Sravan, as for your request for "other ideas", you didn't reply to the
couple of ideas I offered in my last email, attached.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of sravan kumar
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG D
Yeah, adding to what Howard noted, the DOMAIN attribute isn't there for the
reason you're using it. It's instead for controlling use of cookies on that
"single domain" that's setting the cookie, but controlling whether and how
it works for any subdomains under it.
You can't simply name another dom
Yes, and Clarke, I would highly recommend you drop a feedback into the
livedocs on that (the CF8 ones, not 7 or 6, as I don't know that they go
back and review those for ideas, though they should, since some find them
while doing searches.)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug
FWIW, I'll note that while I appreciate the cons of the idea, I also know
that others have seen the pros of it, and the BlueDragon engineers did as
well, and they added a Render function to let you execute CFML code as found
in any variable, whether from a DB query, a shared scope variable, etc.
E, RN,
> Welcome to Athens Regional Health Services.
>
> Dear HEEZA TEST, MD,
> Welcome to Athens Regional Health Services.
>
> Dear PETER PARKER, ,
> Welcome to Athens Regional Health Services.
>
> Dear BRUCE WAYNE, PHD,
> Welcome to Athens Regional Health Services.
&
I'm curious about their phrasing of "older installations of Cold Fusion
applications" and FCKEditor. It was only included as of CF8 (codenamed
scorpio, as mentioned in this news from the fckeditor folks:
http://www.fckeditor.net/Adobe_to_embed_FCKeditor_in_ColdFusion). So it's
too bad that the open
Yep, and it seems (as also discussed in John Mason's entry, at
http://www.codfusion.com/blog/post.cfm/cf8-and-fckeditor-security-threat)
that the problem goes beyond just what can be abused if one uses CFTEXTAREA
richtext="yes", but in fact what the hackers can do leveraging the FCKeditor
directly.
Well, I don't know. I think it's just that it was written in Delphi, and
perhaps Adobe doesn't have enough (or want to bother with) Delphi skills to
keep it going. It was brought forward from Allaire, and when Macromedia
already had DW it kind of spelled the beginning of the end. The first step
was
Sure, but let's not dismiss as hopelessly incapable of supporting source
code control. It does. It has built-in support for the SCC API, which is
supported by many source code control apps. I've hooked it up to SVN.
Conversely, Eclipse can certainly be hooked directly to a remote server via
FTP. Ho
Well, Steve, I don't know if you meant me in the "you guys", but I had said
in my note yesterday (to which Doug was replying) that, "I really think it's
just part of the economic times". I offered the rest because I do think a
lot of people don't know about the fact that HS was written in Delphi, o
Well, yeah, it could. But the thrust of the attack (and the focus of this
one) has been on sites that DO have it pre-installed, which is as of CF8.
No denying, of course, that sites that added FCKeditor themselves would be
vulnerable as well, but then it wouldn't be anything CF-specific at that
p
And for those not on CF8, there are still other ways that don't require
CFEXECUTE or direct access to the server. Here's a blog entry I did on 3
ways to find info on the version of DB drivers being used by CF, varying
based on what level of access you have to the server:
http://www.carehart.org/bl
ySQL
Charlie,
I think that your URL broke across two lines.
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2006/8/8/checking_jdbc_driver_version
The above link should work.
Teddy R. Payne, ACCFD
Google Talk - teddyrpa...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
A
Eh? I don’t understand, honestly. How does a broken URL affect bandwidth? I’ll
assume you don’t mean bytes but time. You mean it’s regard as an offense if a
URL breaks? But it’s not something people do intentionally. It’s done by their
mail clients.
The solution is just to hit reply, so
Just to be clear, I didn’t take it as patronizing. “We cool.” :-)
But I stand by my statement (and confused by Jasun’s laughter. I was being
serious. But maybe that’s what he was laughing at.)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Teddy R. Payne
Sent: We
Ah, ok. Thanks. :-)
And to be clear, Teddy, I did in my reply say that you could have meant
either form of bandwidth. Meant to clarify that in my note below.
Juggling many things today, including a very cool announcement to come later
today about a special CF Meetup event. Will share more
Hey folks, hope you won't mind me sharing this here but I assume many will
be interested.
This coming Monday (July 13) at noon US EDT we'll be having an extra special
session of the online CF Meetup (coldfusionmeetup.com), where Adobe has
offered to host a special two-hour session, "Centaur and
Just posted it (on the meetup site), and was about to send it to the group
here. Coming right up.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Teddy R. Payne
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 3:13 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: broken urls in email RE: [ACFUG
Clarke, in addition to the good stuff Shawn shared [and btw, Shawn, I'd
enjoy seeing that code :-)], I'll note that at least as far as the point he
made:
> So the hoster is left with a hard choice: disable CFEXECUTE, CFOBJECT,
> CreateObject(.NET), CreateObject(COM) and CreateObject(JAVA) or accep
Well, you can also do it with the Server mode. Have been able to since CF 6
(but I know many prefer multiserver mode for many reasons).
The challenge is just the web server integration, which is why (since 6)
there has been the built-in web server as an alternative, so that the new CF
edition d
Natlya, the AFFUG meets in the same place as the ACFUG, the offices of:
Echo Eleven
3525 Piedmont Rd NE
Building 7, Suite 400
Atlanta, GA 30305
770-337-8363
That number is for EchoEleven, as offered in the meeting detail page shown
to meetup members who RSVP. I don't think it would be a number to
Uh, here it comes, the annual framework debate. :-) I’m only joking, Clarke.
It’s a reasonable question.
The good news is that you will indeed get opinions. You’ll just have to sift
through them. I think the problem with the discussion is that there’s no one
good answer. As with so many thin
On top of what Teddy offered in reply to your question, Tim, I’d point out as
well that despite CF9 having ORM built-in, the other ORM frameworks could
continue to exist for years if only to serve those who don’t move to 9 (there’s
traditionally a long slow march to any new release, taking years
Just to be clear, Robert, the listing of the components in the DW feature is
driven from the server-side via RDS (just like the list of datasources,
etc.), so if there's a problem with DW seeing it, it's not about the setup
of your site (assuming your site points to the server with the CFCs) but
ra
Well, one thing to consider it to optimize the collection (can be done in
the CF Admin or with CFCOLLECTION).
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Howard
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:47 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] verity b
Beyond John's helpful info (and I recommend his hosting), I will say to
address Timothy's concern that there are in fact many low-cost CF hosts. I
list them in a category of my CF411 site:
ColdFusion Hosting Alternatives
http://www.cf411.com/#cfhost
I don't identify their prices, so you would nee
Hey Sean, that wouldn't be a problem with the RDS implementation. That would
be with the aspect of adding a server to be managed from within CFB.
I do so lament that they have gone this way of kind of forcing people into
thinking that they need to "add their server" to CFB, and that they need to
o, I'm wishing I was presenting "Using That Shiny New Coldfusion Builder",
but alas I'm not. I see a good topic for someone to step up and present on
here.
Douglas Knudsen
http://www.cubicleman.com
this is my signature, like it?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Charlie
Not a word has been spoken. :-)
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Mike Staver
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] ADobe ColdFusion Builder
>
> Does anyone know an est
Hey Clarke, I caught your comment here, that
> I was originally going to start with ColdBox to learn a ColdFusion
framework. But, I quickly got lost in the complexity. To really use ColdBox,
you
> end up needing to know Coldspring and Transfer. But, since each of those
has a learning curve,
Well, I don't use ColdBox myself, so I can't answer your question about
whether CB expects one to use an ORM. Maybe someone else can chime here, or
again the CB list/forum would be a great place to ask. I just wanted to
clarify that one point about it not needing transfer or coldpsring to do
develo
tation "Sessions and Clients and Crashes, Oh
My!", with Charlie Arehart at this link
http://www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup/calendar/10155133/?from=list
<http://www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup/calendar/10155133/?from=list&offset=
0> &offset=0
I had a question pop up today a
No worries. Just clarifying. Will look forward to your reply there.
Nothing to see here folks. Move along. :-)
Or, "Turn to the cfmeetup message board for continued coverage of this
breaking story." :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ajas Moha
Did identifying the server version solve your problem, Andrew? I'd think
not, as I'd expect instead for you to get a CFML compilation error using a
tag that's not supported by an older version.
Instead, I would wonder if the problem is really with the underlying
Javascript libraries that are used
And third, if you get the announcements didn't notice, the topics and
speaker lineup have changed as of yesterday.
Briefly, it's John Mason leading a "CFUnited Conference Review" and then
giving a talk on "Some of the New ColdFusion 9 Features". Not sure the order
they will be offered, but they'r
Just to forestall saying, "that doesn't work for me", the nifty ability to
do the statuscode in CFLOCATION is new in CF8. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Cheyenne
Throckmorton
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 1:52 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject:
Yep, that talk, from 6/11/09 is available at
recordings.coldfusionmeetup.com. Thanks for mentioning it, Tom.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Tom McNeer
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 10:47 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Mura
Thanks for the kind regards, Clarke. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Clarke Bishop
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:04 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Mura Content Management System
Thanks Tom and Charlie!
I had a
Kristine, the blog entry pointed to clarifies that it DOES NOT apply to
teachers.
Teachers do get a discount, though (to $995, if they use the code EDU966). Of
course, that's not nearly as deep as the student discount.
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad
For those who may not have heard otherwise, nor saw the announcement posted
on the web site, this month's meeting is not tonight (as usual) but instead
next week, primarily because of conflicts with Max.
/charlie
-
To unsubscribe
Or on may find it a little easier to use ini files, and CF's functions to
read them (added in CF 6), such as getprofilestring, getprofilesections,
setprofilestring.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Wes Byrd
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 6:03 PM
To: dis
I just thought I should offer a heads up about why you’ll want to attend next
week’s ACFUG.
If you hadn’t seen the announcements list note Wednesday, I’ll be the speaker
at next week’s ACFUG meeting and I’ll be presenting “Hidden Gems in CFBuilder”.
Well, some of you may also have notic
Do you mean will I record the ACFUG meeting? No, we've just found that that
rarely works well, when you record an in-room presentation.
But given that your in Colorado, I certainly would then recommend that YOU go
ahead and just attend the online CF meetup :-), which is at 6pm Eastern on
Thursd
Hey folks, check this out, just for CFers, and happening in Atlanta on Wed
Nov 18. It's great that Atlanta is one of the several cities chosen. It
seems like just the ticket for those of us who have been on the fence about
Flex as CF developers. :-) I've registered, but don't know anything more
abo
Ajas, you mention some loving/some hating XML files. I didn't see any reply
from you on my note offering yet another alternative (sent 10/24), where I
said simply:
"Or one may find it a little easier to use ini files, and CF's functions to
read them (added in CF 6), such as getprofilestring, ge
Good point. I did say I realized that ini files weren’t as “robust or
flexible”. :-) But WDDX files are definitely a step above that before making up
one’s own XML. They all have their place, so good to be reminded every once in
a while.
And thanks for the concurrence on INI files, Wes. :-)
Wes, check out nocCode, http://noccode.riaforge.org/, a web-based editor
with specific CFML support.
Speaking of that, if anyone ever has a question like "are there any tools or
resources for xxx", please try to remember (and recommend to each other) my
CF411.com site. There, I have a category
Darren, if among those "miscellaneous staff" you may want to outsource some
CF admin/install/config/tuning/troubleshooting help, I'm available for that
kind of work on a contractual basis.
Same offer goes to anyone needing that kind of help, really.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mail
Wow, well with all that foundation money, they've found the right guy to
guard it. :-) I know, I know, there'd be no connection between the site and
the money. Just having fun. We'll certainly miss you, Dean, personally and
professionally. Maybe you'll choose to remain on the list and contribute as
t doing any dev work, I'll be working
> in InfoSec on security across the board (development, network, os,
> etc.).
>
> -dhs
>
> On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
>
> > Wow, well with all that foundation money, they've found the right guy
> to
Besides Cam's useful ideas, since you say you're running multiserver, I'll
suggest one other possibility: are you sure you enabled the debugging in the
right CF Admin? There's the cfusion one (on the main port, like 8300 if
using the built-in web server), then there's the one for each instance you
Thanks for the clarification, Clarke (and yep, Cam's the man!).
As for your question, yes, this (stopping the cfusion instance in the
multiserver deployment, when it's not needed) is an optimization that I
often point to my customers (for CF Server troubleshooting, tuning, etc.).
Of course, you
Yep, if one runs the instances as services, that’s an easy way to start them,
as Arun said.
If you don’t want to run them as services there are of course still other ways
to stop/start the instance. And either way, there are options to start them
from the command line or a shortcut.
Fir
sage-
> From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Cameron
> Childress
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:52 PM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion debugging info
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Charlie Arehart
> w
Hey folks, some will have gotten an email on the announcements list about next
week’s holiday part. I wanted to offer an update.
While it mentioned Artuzzi’s for dinner and WhirlyBall after that, it didn’t
mention the after party at ComputerArena, just around the corner. I’ve just
updated the e
...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Cameron
> Childress
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:18 AM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion debugging info
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Charlie Arehart
> wrote:
> > I don&#
Wow, guys, I would offer significant caution about a lot of the assertions
here.
It's NOT always true that increasing memory will improve performance. Not at
all. Indeed, there are times when increasing the heap could cause MORE
problems (and even just raising it from 512 to 768). It's too much t
To be clear, I wasn't referring at all to anything about you or setup
Derrick. :-) Still, as you're saying, yes there are also those kinds of
issues that can cause problems as well. Good that you've isolated a lot of
them.
That said, as for your moving to BD, I will argue that when some have
asser
Thanks, and to your next observation, I'll note that I do list resources
listing sites using CF in my CF411:
http://www.carehart.org/cf411/#cfpowered
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:31 PM
To: discussio
Just a couple more thoughts: if you really are just interested in the time
of execution for the *complete* request, then besides adding logging in your
application.cfc (as Cam helpfully suggested), note as well that info maybe
available in your web server logs. I know it's an option you can enable
No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention,
sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents
the wise choice of many alternatives.
t become what we need to be, remaining what we are.
No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention,
sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution;
Ajas, while you await Derrick's reply, I'll point out that the details for
how to purge database-driven CF client variable repositories is indeed
documented, but only in a technote:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/185/tn_18514.html
As for FR helping you see the time being spent per request and that thi
Yep, Ajas, that's the one. It's a SERIOUS drain on most servers (for reasons
I elaborate on in the resources I linked to). So yes, if you do use the
client.lastvisit variable, you will want to seriously consider how valuable
it is and whether you might get value doing it otherwise.
/charlie
wer." -Steve Jobs
"A good deal that used to be a great deal, is not nearly as good as an awful
deal that was once a horrible deal." - Dan Gilbert, http://bit.ly/8gUruX
_
On Jan 25, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
Derrick, I'll offer a
ed
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:03 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Ideal memory & Configuration for CF Production
server?
Thanks Charlie for confirming that setting.
Do you want to know where I learned that? The answer is : From Mr.
tion for CF Production
server?
Come on Charlie, don't be so humble. You're one of the community stars, and
have been for years. Revel in some kudos for a moment...
_
From: Charlie Arehart
To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 11:22:46 AM
Subject: RE:
Yep, sometimes it's a browser caching thing. Try adding a querystring with
random numbers to the page to force a browser refresh (?xyz, for instance).
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of John Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:17 PM
To: discussion
Ajas, given your experience with CF, I'm a little confused how to reply. If
this was a brand new user, I'd say that they have things backward and even
then still misunderstood.
First, the main difference is that the code in blue would execute once for
each query result, whereas the code in red wou
Is this 8.01, Howard? Since you refer to images, if you may be processing
them with CFIMAGE, there's a hotfix for image processing specifically
related to problems with the resulting files, and it may be connected to
your problem. See:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/403/kb403411.html
And note that whi
I offered my reply before seeing yours here, Derrick. Doh. But thanks for
the confidence that I'd have something to offer. :-)
As to your last point, I don't know. I mean, sure, those who move to more
OO-like development will tend to consider options where query results are
generated in a CFC met
g] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:12 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Query or Stored Proc calling
Ajas, given your experience with CF, I'm a little confused how to reply. If
this was a brand new user, I'd say that they have thin
plies will seem out of order, if not "out
of the blue". :-(
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:33 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] cfdocument error
Is this 8.01, How
Does that last "update" on the question indicate this is now answered for
you, Clarke? It's hard to tell the relative time of that, compared to when
you asked this. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Clarke Bishop
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:50
Jeff, one other thing: if you're on CF8 or above, use the new localurl
attribute (of CFDOCUMENT) which was introduced in CF8.
Under the covers, if there are images (or other file references) in the
CFDOCUMENT, CF will generate an HTTP request for them by default. Using this
attribute, you're tell
Jeff, I don't have enough experience with this to offer any answer, but I
will make a suggestion: what version of CF is this, and what level of
cumulative hotfixes are installed? You can see this in the "system
information" page of the CF Admin.
It's possible that this issue has been addressed by
Kristine, you may want to clarify what's doing the searching. We'll assume
you're talking about a CF page, but are you using Verity? Solr (new in CF9)?
SQL Server's text searching? Plain SQL? It may help for us to know.
While we await that, I have a thought: since you say that c## became c# (in
Kristine, besides Teddy's helpful info today, had you seen my reply to your
note from over the weekend, attached?
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Kristine
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:50 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] C# quest
:47 PM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
Kristine, besides Teddy’s helpful info today, had you seen my reply to your
note from over the weekend, attached?
/charlie
-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http
To Steve's last point, you can see the recording of his CFMeetup talk, like
all CFMeetup talks, at http://recordings.coldfusionmeetup.com.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Steve Drucker
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 8:44 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subj
Was this helpful, Jeff? I realize it may not be, but since it's both a new
(since 8) and under-discussed feature, I want to make sure it's not the
solution for you.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Saturday, February 06,
401 - 500 of 832 matches
Mail list logo
