r-on-electromagnetic-emanations-part-3/
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato
URL: http://t-sato.in.coocan.jp
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send y
; 3. Used our Ground Bond Tester set to 60 amps. One plate measured 3-4mΩ,
> the other 1-3mΩ
If you want to ignore the contact resistance, did you tried four-point
probe method?
https://www.suragus.com/en/technology/four-point-probe/
Regards,
Tom
-
--
, although
I would prefer to use a single 3-phase LISN.
BTW, there maybe confusion with the term "single-phase LISNs" here.
Is it LISNs commonly used for single-phase AC supply?
Or is it LISNs for an single power supply
pling
> device” forms the ‘D’ of decoupling part.
Yes, and it is the horizontal distance, not the cable length.
Clause 7.8 of the standard clearly says:
The injection point shall be located between 0,1 m and 0,3 m from
the geometric projection of the EUT on to the reference ground plane.
T
to get other quotes.
No response to
these queries. Has anyone else has similar experience with them?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
EMC Engineer
Smiths Aerospace
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
Tom:
I'm not familiar with N8110, but allow me to say a few things. 3,000 V/m is
a rather high field
*** ...
and the figure in the corrigendum tells us the same thing.
It is exactly what I thought first, but I'm afraid that many of the old
equipment will not pass this verification.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-Original Message-
From
that should
be considered..
Tom Savino has been a Senior Product Safety Engineer since 1998. He tests and
evaluates various types of equipment and machineries to various standards
including medical, laboratory/measurement, and office. Much of this equipment
has lasers, and must be evaluated
that should
be considered..
Tom Savino has been a Senior Product Safety Engineer since 1998. He tests and
evaluates various types of equipment and machineries to various standards
including medical, laboratory/measurement, and office. Much of this equipment
has lasers, and must be evaluated
that should
be considered..
Tom Savino has been a Senior Product Safety Engineer since 1998. He tests and
evaluates various types of equipment and machineries to various standards
including medical, laboratory/measurement, and office. Much of this equipment
has lasers, and must be evaluated
we can always say
something like It appears there are no harmonised standard which
exactly covers GPS receiver, so we would recommend to use EN 300 440
instead anyway, but its better for me to have some justification.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3
Forwarding message from Robert Macy
On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:09 PM, m...@sfo.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
You may have to forward to the group for me, .org seems to reject my
emails of late.
I invented very sensitive magnetic field detection sensor
technology that
can replace SQUIDS
-0636
From: douglas_beckw...@mitel.com [mailto:douglas_beckw...@mitel.com]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:12 PM
To: Sykes, William Thomas (Tom)
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org; 'jgoedd...@tycoint.com';
owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: RE: UL60950 3rd vs UL60950-1
The one I have was revised
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
Tom,
I have had experience submitting data taken at a closer distance than
specified, although in this case it was 120kHz RF-ID systems. At close
distances the FCC allows 1/d^2, but the reality is closer to 1/d^3 at 3, 10
at closer distance
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
--
Tom,
I am assuming your device operates at 13.56 MHz. I ran a NEC-2
simulation over average GND and the reduction in field strength is:
DX 1/d NEC
] On Behalf Of Tom Cokenias
Sent: August 23, 2004 6:51 AM
To: Ridler, Samantha; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: Re: Average Detection
Hello Samantha,
For analyzers that do not incorporate an average detector,
the FCC has specified settings of RBW 1 MHz and VBW of 10 Hz
for average
...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Cable Shielding
Tom,
Using a double braided shield will improve the coverage to 99%.
I would guess that having an insulating layer between the shields might allow
return currents to pass along the inner shield with the outer providing an
overall shield, but that would
Tom,
Using a double braided shield will improve the coverage to 99%.
I would guess that having an insulating layer between the shields might allow
return currents to pass along the inner shield with the outer providing an
overall shield, but that would require some creative termination
to test from 10 kHz to 40 GHz but at lower levels. I have a fairly
large system for testing so I am leaning towards a reverb chamber to get
around small antenna beam width issues.
Any leads for a test house, or advice on doing this testing is appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Tom
As I see it:
The term approximation is used in respect of the process of the alignment of
the member countries' national legislations with a specific Directive, as the
Commission and Parliament do not generally like to dictate exactly how the
former shall be worded (although I believe
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
William,
Thank you, this is close enough.
-Doug
Doug Powell, Staff Engineer
Corporate Compliance Dept.
Advanced Energy Industries Inc.
_
From: Sykes, William Thomas (Tom) [mailto:wsy...@lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12
, you are required to do
L N separately.
- If the product standard specifies IEC 61000-4-4:2004, you are required to
test them simultaneously. See Tom Sato's reply on the issue further done in
this email.
You are free to test additional combinations of L N (I know, there aren't
many choices
Tom
My understanding is that these two amendments were added to the 1994 version
in error although I do not have official confirmation of that as of yet.
If it is agreed that they are in error a corrigendum will be issued fairly
soon.
John
John McAuley
Compliance Engineering Ireland Ltd
up to 250 kHz
Hi Tom,
Thanks. I checked FW Bell web site and their models 8010 and 8030 cover
only up to 50 kHz. I will call them to find out if they have any model
which supports 250 kHz range.
Regards
Ravinder Ajmani
HGST, a Western Digital company
ravinder.ajm...@hgst.com
Thomas
Hi Rich,
Thank you and Tom getting this out to us. After reviewing this document, I
noticed that it references IEC 62368 Edition 1. As this Edition 1 was voted
down I believe by most NCBs causing Edition 2 to be created, will ECMA be
updating this document to reflect a comparison to IEC 62368
, Ron Pickard RPQ wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thank you and Tom getting this out to us. After reviewing this document, I
noticed that it references IEC 62368 Edition 1. As this Edition 1 was voted
down I believe by most NCBs causing Edition 2 to be created, will ECMA be
updating this document to reflect
Hi, Tom.
Sorry I left out that key detail. This is inductive coupled communication (and
charging).
Charlie Blackman sent me a lead on RTTE guidance from CEPT. I am fairly certain
this device can be considered Class 1, sub-class 74 under RTTE.
The mag field for the communications is quite
measurements.
on 1/4/02 12:51 PM, Tom Cokenias at t...@tncokenias.org wrote:
At 8:34 AM -0500 1/4/2002, Keith Armstrong wrote:
Does anyone else think that ordinary semiconductors doesn't respond to RF?
I agree that commonly used semiconductors have responses well into
the 100's of MHz
colour bar with moving
element (level 4) can be used.
Anyway, I think the difference of the display test pattern is relatively
small problem.
There are more burdensome differences in, for example, EUT setup, test
method for 1 GHz and above.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CISPR 32, colour bar with moving element (ITU-R BT.1729)
Hi Tom,
I just found your posting of the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern. This
is great!
Does this fully implement the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern?
** BOUNCING BALL: I couldn't find anything
with people who
know the story - chapter and verse.
Luke Turnbull
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Andy [mailto:andy.mccal...@mottmac.com]
Sent: 11 June 2014 13:18
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automotive Directive 2004/104/EC and EN 55012
Hi Tom
But the difference
it is the requirement of the standard.
Regarding to the assumed minimum separate distance of 30 cm, if closer
distance may be reasonably foreseeable in actual use, smaller separate
distance hence higher electromagnetic field levels (i.e. test levels)
may need to be assumed.
Regards,
Tom
--
Hi Tom,
I appreciate your argument, it's something I've discussed with colleagues in
the past.
I have tested a few products where the digital bus to the radio module has
caused EMC problems. These emissions have only been visible when data is
being actively transferred across the CPU - digital
mpedance spec down to 150 kHz, and its
EUT port impedance is j4.7 ohms at 150 kHz.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato <vef00...@nifty.com>
URL: http://t-sato.in.coocan.jp
>> From: "T.Sato" <vef00...@nifty.com>
>> Reply-To: "T.Sato" <vef00...@nif
- modification of requirements for ADSL/SSDSL terminals
- modification of requirements for cable modems
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our
suggestions on vendors?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
tdonnelly@act-sys
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail
wrote:
If the centrifuge is used for blood, then it is covered under the MDD.
Maybe the In-Vitro Directive, if the centrifuge is intended to
be used for in-vitro diagnostic applications.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/
This message is from
The ETS catalog confirms this antenna does in fact have a balun built in.
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
tdonnelly@act-sys
From: Luke Turnbull [mailto:luke.turnb...@trw.com]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:56 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; ywle...@vtc.edu.hk
Subject: Re: Balun
was fixed.
Depending on what you use your product for, this might present
problems that make it impractical to market such a product.
Hope this helps.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consultingwww.tncokenias.org
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
this is a good lubricant, and will work
very well from a
mechanical standpoint, I would have concerns from an
electrical standpoint.
WD-40 is not conductive and will cause the shielding
effectiveness of the
RCM to degrade somewhat.
Tom Donnelly
I agree that the WD-40 is not a conductive
.
Tom Donnelly
From: bob.edwa...@invensys.com [mailto:bob.edwa...@invensys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:40 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMC chamber door lubricant?
Can anyone recommend a spray-on grease which doesn't dry out too quickly
for gasket lubrication on EMC
requested
they contact me twice on their web page to get other quotes. No response
to
these queries. Has anyone else has similar experience with them?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
EMC Engineer
Smiths Aerospace
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product
and can become quite useless for reference levels not supported by
the meter.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Hi Grace
Which section you use, 15.247 or 15.249, will depend on the output power or
radiated field strength of the fundamental frequency.
Best regards
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Members,
Do
Hi Bob
See sec 2.1204 Import Conditions
They allow between 200and 2000 of each model depending on product type as
defined in this paragraph
Best regards
Tom
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:56 AM, rehel...@mmm.com wrote:
Is there a limitation
difficult to achieve low SVSWR.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc
.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived
Gas Pedals' Link to EMI
This might be of interest to the group, especially those involved
with EMC immunity testing of automotive parts.
best regards
Tom
http://www.interferencetechnology.com/markets/automotive/lead-news-
item/article/agencies-probe-link-between-gas-pedals-and-emi.html
unit to power the box.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings
certification per 15.101, yes?
best regards
Tom
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Dennis Ward wrote:
Of course, having said that someone will probably pull out of the hat
the
one instance where some obscure intentional
operating
near a computer - the 27 MHz will couple into the power lines and
perhaps will result in line conducted emissions that exceed the
limits, but it's not an equipment authorization issue.
- or so it seems to me.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting www.tncokenias.org
P.O
for immunity in
acoordance with the requirements of 60601, we don't have to
show that the equipment would not affect the essential
performance or safety of the system, hance no risk analysis
would not be required here.
That is what the clause of the standards says, I think.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato
similar experience with them?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
EMC Engineer
Smiths Aerospace
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web
Ken,
This information should be on the mfr's Declaration of Conformity for
the product.
best regards
Tom
At 2:16 PM -0500 5/3/04, Ken Javor wrote:
From the responses I am getting, I was not clear in my original query.
If I have bought, or wish to buy a product with a CE mark applied, how
Worm. If this
continues I will be forced by my company to withdraw from the
group. Anyone
else in the same boat?
Tom:
These are spoofed addresses. They do not originate from the group, nor from
the individuals indicated. I traced down a couple of them, and they were
coming from a high school
the LISN's to meet the curve with the filters
attached. Anyone else run into this problem?
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
From: Bill Stumpf [mailto:bstu...@dlsemc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:50 PM
To: 'emcp...@aol.com'; emc-p
.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.
IEEE PSES Main Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
think that another extrapolation method may be permitted for
compliance with the section of the FCC rules, and somebody here may
have experience to use the method other than applying 1/d.
That's why I posted the question here.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http
opinion only.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p
and now 802.11 radios operating under 15.247 of the
Rules.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
cell 650 302 0887
At 8:21 AM +0100 8/23/04, Ridler, Samantha wrote:
Hello All
FCC part 18 requires the use
Pfingsten Road
Northbrook, IL
Time: 6:00pm - 7:30pm
Please let either of us know if you plan to attend. Announcement of this
meeting will NOT appear in SCANFAX this time so please spread the word
to your colleagues!
RSVP to:
Tom Brenner - 847/ 537-6400 tbren...@dlsemc.com
.
Any leads for a test house, or advice on doing this testing is appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety
/radiotte.html
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consultingwww.tncokenias.org
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
cell 650 302 0887
At 12:31 AM +0100 1/9/05, Konrad StefaŸski wrote:
Hello all
I would like ask you about harmonised
to express your thanks to Tom Bao
tomj...@yahoo.com for publishing and maintaining RCIC for the past 6
years. It was a useful resource for our industry and will be missed.
Best regards, Art Michael
Int'l Product Safety News(devoted to electrical product safety compliance)
A.E. Michael, Editor
166 Congdon
-language version, hosted by Tom Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp,
will continue at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq
The textfiles will continue for some time to be available from my website
http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk as files seecfaq1.txt and seecfaq2.txt
BUT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
Martin
Reginald,
The criteria is in 47 CFR 2.948 (Part 2 of the FCC rules). The contact
person was/is Tom Phillips (OET office). I would recommend contacting him
before undertaking the task and checking out the FCC website for
information, specifically the OET office (Office of Engineering
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: May 14, 2002 (second Tuesday of the month)
Society Chapter: IEEE EMC Society
Subject: EMC REGULATIONS AND REGULATORS: WHAT'S NEW, WHO'S WHO
Speaker: Barbara Judge, Compliance Certification Services
Time: 5:30 Social, 7:00 Presentation
Place:
Tims
Compliance Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Robert Macy [SMTP:m...@california.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 11:42 AM
To: Tom Cokenias; Peter Poulos; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Magnetic field immunity in the Arctic regions
Don't need SQUIDs to read earth's field
-Original Message-
From: Sykes, William Thomas (Tom) [ mailto:wsy...@lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:56 PM
To: 'brian_ku...@leco.com'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Making Standards Free
All:
SNIP
Part of End User License Agreement (EULA) for IEC docs
-Original Message-
From: Sykes, William Thomas (Tom) [ mailto:wsy...@lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:56 PM
To: 'brian_ku...@leco.com'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Making Standards Free
All:
Please don't bite into the myth that US Federal, Government
power supply units which are aleady
PS-E marked under the manufacturer's own responsibility.
Please also note that the power cord may also need to be PS-E marked
if it is of a detachable one.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato
Hi Asim,
As long as you supply the ferrites and installation instructions to the user,
it's been an acceptable practice with FCC for many years.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
cell 650 302 0887
On Oct 20
for?
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
it actually mean 1m, or is it intended to be 0.5m?
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message
Hi Christopher
Check with UL CCS in Fremont, they have two antenna pattern test chambers.
www.ccsemc.com
Good luck,
best regards
Tom
On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Christopher wrote:
Folks,
I would like to get the antenna patterns for our 802.11 Access point
Antenna's.
I am looking
therein.
This means you can do tests at your location if you already have the equipment.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Scott Xe wrote:
I notice that some compliance reports of RTTE are reviewed by a notified
,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc
, lower levels here may be the lower levels
specified in clause 5 of the standard.
See also Guidance Note Addresses Surge Test Problems, at:
http://www.ce-mag.com/archive/02/11/williams.html
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato
Tom
On Jan 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, ravinder.ajm...@hgst.com wrote:
Hello Experts,
I am looking for a Gaussmeter to measure DC and AC magnetic fields up to 250
kHz. I have tried searching on line but am unable to find one which covers
such high frequency. I will appreciate any help
Hi Lauren
ELF and VLF emissions are a concern for SEM installations since the B field can
possible distort the electron beam
SEMI EMC calls it out
Best regards
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
wrote:
Is ‘ELF’ (as in ‘ELF EMI
Posted on behalf of Tom Burke, UL:
More good news for those seeking to learn more about IEC 62368-1 as the
ICT Industry prepares for the eventual transition from IEC 60950-1 (and
IEC 60065) to IEC 62368-1. ECMA International, previously known as the
European Computer Manufacturers
as is?
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
Hi John
Section 15.209 has general requirements for radiated emissions for intentional
radiators (transmitters). At these frequencies you would be allowed 200 uV/m
at 3m, not much but you aren't allowed higher power until you get to 902-928
MHz band.
best regards
Tom
On Mar 12, 2013, at 12
, to the side plate.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list
Hi Lauren
Is this over the air 1700 kHz transmission or conducted over wire or AC mains?
best regards
Tom Cokenias
On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Crane, Lauren wrote:
I am looking for advice on how to determine the EU RTTE class of a product.
The product has a base station and a sensor
Peter, these are in paragraph 15.247 of 47CFR15 (Part 15 of FCC Rules)
best regards
Tom
On May 22, 2013, at 11:40 PM, Peter Merguerian wrote:
ISM-2.4
Freq. Range: 2400-2483.5 MHz
Bandwidth: 83.5 MHz
Max TPO PtM: 30 dBm (1 Watt)
Max EIRP PtM: 36 dBm (4 Watts)
Max TPO PtP: 30 dBm (1
coating on a metallic structure., so I think
we should put the casters, which have plastic wheel but metal hub
and metal supporting structure so probably not bulk non-conducting,
on 0.1 m insulating support in this case.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3
it would far
easier to put such EUTs on 0.1m insulating support as far as possible
also for 61000-4-4 testing.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE
: Japan METI Ordinance 1
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:15:53 -0700,
Peter Merguerian pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, does anyone know where I can purchase METI Ordinance 1?
Can you explain what is the METI Ordinance 1?
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3
field using
IEC 61000-4-18 generator and the test method described in IEC 61000-4-10.
At least for slow damped oscillatory magnetic field, some manufactures
offer their IEC 61000-4-18 test generator as the current source, I think.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http
become troublesome to weld thick metal sheets placed on the floor,
and some material may not suitable for welding.
I rather like not to weld and bond them with other means.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato
enough for ANSI C63.4,
for EUTs which may completely fill a typical 1m x 1.5m table?
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
serious consequences.
Regards,
Tom
--
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message
govt or
military.
best regards
Tom
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
mobile 650 302 0887
On Oct 12, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Christopher wrote:
Folks,
I am trying to understand what steps we need to take to certify a 4.5GHz radio
product
/Site Attenuation
Tom,
Did you get to the presentation about getting the most out of a biconical
antenna? Some thoughts contained there on antenna calibration, too.
I found some time ago that using antennas does lead to the kind of mutual
coupling Martin talked about, and also
: Tom Burke
Location: Hewlett Packard, 19447 Prunridge Ave. Cupertino CA, Bldg. 48,
Oakroom
PRESENTATION:
Mr. Thomas Burke, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., will review recent
developments associated with the Bi-National Standard for Information
Technology Equipment, CSA C22.2 No. 950-95/UL 1950
which are the backbone of
the group.
Tom Bao, of the Regulatory Compliance Information Centre (RCIC) is an avid
supporter of this group and publishes on the 'Net a full listing of the
traffic that appears on this group. I may be wrong, but I think there is
a connection to Compliance Engineering
to restrict the lower limit of the height scan is not
required. As with the 1/2 wave tuned dipole I have found the best correlation
occurs when the electrical centers of the antennas are near the same elevation.
Tom Donnelly
EMC Engineer
Lucent Technologies
tdonne...@lucent.com
inductance, instead of stictly air core inductance - LISN specs will
give you saturation current, probably well above the current your product
will draw.
Best regards,
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC Radio Type Approvals
tel 650-726-1263fax 650-726-1252
saturation current, probably well above the current your product
will draw.
Best regards,
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC Radio Type Approvals
tel 650-726-1263fax 650-726-1252
to impose EMC requirements on certain import commodities under
the existing CCIB/CCEE safety requirements. Does any body know the
status ?
Thanks to all.
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC and Radio Approvals
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel
401 - 500 of 807 matches
Mail list logo
