* On 2002.10.08, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Richard Cattien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Control-G cancels most prompted operations.
More precisely, ^G probably cancels all prompted operations. I just
didn't want to make an assertion I hadn't proven. :)
Well, why the heck this is not
* On 2002.09.25, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Bright, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to bounce emails with a command line entry. Is there a way to
do this with mutt? I read through the manual of how it does thru the
interface but not how it can be done from the command line.
* On 2002.09.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Dogbert Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#-label
Should be:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#x-label
yes, that's the one. however, the description does not mention
whether it adds a command
* On 2002.09.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* D. J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ppl,
I just realized that when i'm reading my mail, the Date: field is
missing...
unignore Date:
--
-D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
Sun Project, APC/UCCO
* On 2002.09.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Pankaj Jangid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Why mutt sends all the messages as attachments ?
Mutt doesn't generally send messages as attachments. All outbound
messages are MIME documents, though, and adhere to the MIME
specification.
* On 2002.09.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Heiko Heil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mutt Users,
what can I do in order to display all (and complete) threads which are
initiated by myself which are containing messages from me.
I'm not sure how to add in the second part of this,
* On 2002.09.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* kevin lyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quite a few replies saying, had enough fun yet? september's over now,
cut it out.
Puts some highlight on their perspective, doesn't it? It's been
September for quite some years now, and I see no signs of autumn
* On 2002.09.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regularly deal with mail when I'm away from my DSL pipe. Right now
I'm at the coffee shop and the postponed messages are piling up. When
I get back to the office I'd like to be able to
* On 2002.09.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020911 18:08]:
Ryan:
The pipe symbol needs to be inside the quotation marks, but it's not
allowed to take arguments.
What no arguments? Worked fine for me - see
* On 2002.09.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Michael Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it won't. send-hook only allows you to execute configuration
commands, like you would put in a muttrc. What he's trying to do is
execute one of Mutt's interactive functions. There is no exec
* On 2002.09.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:59:24AM -0400, Bruno Lustosa wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Actually my sig is at least ELEVEN lines, but hey, whose counting ?
( FYI - The last part of
* On 2002.08.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would never do that. Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
spam.
If I could be so lucky. Sometimes. Heh.
--
-D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
Sun
* On 2002.08.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like i said - this
list is for newbies.
You remind me a lot of Dogbert.
I love mutt. I set an alias to remind me of this insightful remark, and
right after a ^L redraw, all messages from Sven show
* On 2002.08.14, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Broken sending software, iso-8859-1 doesn't contain a Euro symbol, ยค.
The encoding should be iso-8859-15. If you can't see the Euro at the
end of the line above, then you have a problem with your setup.
* On 2002.08.14, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if I see a circle with an x through it instead
of a Euro? I'm using the font aliased as 10x20
(-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1), on
Solaris 9's X11R6. I realize that's
* On 2002.08.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a simple and fast way to tag all
attachments in the current folder for deletion?
Probably not, since there's no way in invoke a sequence of keystrokes
on each member of a set of tegged messages.
* On 2002.08.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Chris Stork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save
emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where automatically means
that I don't want to put a save-hook
* On 2002.08.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Calum Selkirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if mutt could be ./configure'd --with-pcre (nondefault, of course),
there'd be virtually no problems with confusion between regexps
found in various published .muttrc's and the syntax mutt linked with
* On 2002.08.02, in 20020802115532.GC12347@erpland,
* Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
instead of mutt-dev]
Maybe, but it's also a request for someone to further develop the
* On 2002.08.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
want to you need to go to the attachments view of the message,
tag everything you want to
* On 2002.07.31, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strictly speaking, if used as a shared library, and existing regexp
support is blown away and replaced, then it reduces bloat.
Not necessarily. I'm not already using pcre, so it still bloats my
system
Oops, I meant to reply to Roman's text, too, but my delete finger was
hyperactive.
* On 2002.07.31, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, vim's regex support is completely b0rken IMO. its (no) magic
switches... weird syntax... ugh.
What Mark
* On 2002.07.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Lee J. Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaah, I thought with Mutt it was strictly backticks and the pipe
only came into it with dgc's patch. I should've at least tried
it out before writing. Thanks! ;)
To clarify this: variables which refer to
* On 2002.07.25, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can use mutt for that:
(1) open a (mailbox) folde with mutt.
(2) :set mbox_type=maildir
(3) now save all messages to
a new (maildir) folder:
tag-patternalltag-prefixsave-message+newfolder
* On 2002.07.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be missing something, but I didn't think
_any_ mutt was using the GNU Readline Library?
it depends on how you use the configure options:
~/mutt-1.4 ./configure --help | grep GNU
--with-regex
* On 2002.07.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops! indeed - i completely misread that.
hmm... so what about mutt and readline? *grin*
i remember that linkitn with readline would add
quite a lot to the binary. how true is that?
shell$ ll demo.*
* On 2002.07.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so this adds at least 120K.. with *any* mutt.
Well, it's rather orthogonal. Mutt has extensible line-editing, history,
and filename completion already. Using readline would mean losing your
editor menu
* On 2002.07.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to be able to do that within Mutt. I haven't figured out how to get
the image to xv without going into the ``v'' attachment menu, which
hides the text part of the mail.
I'll assume that the other postings
* On 2002.07.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mutt documentation says that the 'home' and 'end' keys on the
keyboard should make you jump to the beginning and the end of a
message while reading it.
On Solaris 8 running on sparc (with a standard
* On 2002.07.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
harder to misconfigure).
Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're
doing complicated things with it). It's
* On 2002.07.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance that somebody can place a compressed archive in
correct mbox format somewhere on the web (I would, but I
have too low quota)?
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt-users-199919-200207.mbox.bz2
It's
* On 2002.07.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the compressed file is about 12MB and the uncompressed about 85MB.
Well, I compressed it as much as I could -- oh, maybe you meant to point
out my typo... yes, it's megabytes, not gigabytes. I get
* On 2002.06.21, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lukas Ruf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I like the feature of mutt to collapse threads. However, is it
possible to have a special character being displayed in the index in
front of a collapsed thread?
* On 2002.06.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no dumb questions, especially in tech support :-)
Oh, I have to disagree.
ME: So, I'm at my [DSL] router's console, and when I type connect
atm-0 it tells me that the link can't be established.
* On 2002.06.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That part i can take care of myself. But, as usual, there's the spam
problem. When i go into my inbox and see eighteen pieces of spam, i'd like
to tag them all, run a macro, and have those messages deleted
* On 2002.06.08, in 20020608212345.GB4832@sumida,
* Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question,
* On 2002.06.09, in 20020609113937.A15126@Verdi,
* John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting set to do my first non-rpm install of mutt and therefore my
first usage of make.
Looking at Sven's Installation Examples, I see outputted logs showing
the results of configure, make
* On 2002.06.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Mike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
macro compose 3 edit-from^Umy_alias^M; \
edit-bcc^Uother_addr^M Set From to my_alias
Why is there a ';', I don't
* On 2002.06.07, in 20020607193705.GC30963@sumida,
* Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a folder history? I couldn't find it in the Mutt manual,
and interestingly, a Google search on [folder history and mutt] turns
up one result: History of Shania Twain. Figure that!
The
* On 2002.06.04, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 23:25 -0700 03 Jun 2002, Jeremy Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm connecting to a server that supports both imap and imaps, and even though
I'm setting mutt to connect via imap, it asks me about the
* On 2002.06.04, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a handy utility that spits out the keycodes it gets, though I'm
sure the equivalent could be whipped in perl as a one-liner. Anybody
recall it?
You might be thinking of dumpkeys, but it's a Linux
* On 2002.06.04, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:55:28AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
needed for connecting securely to servers that don't accept connections
on the imaps port, but instead support the STARTTLS extension
* On 2002.05.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Michael Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I automatically pick the correct From: address based on the mailbox I
am currently reading mail in?
Yes. There's one feature that uses whatever address a message was sent
to as the sender address for
* On 2002.05.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Romano B. Fonbuena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible for mutt to have the ability
of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers
into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail
for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?
No. You
* On 2002.05.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original thinking was that the color should depend on only the
level of the quote, and when I saw that vim did it this way, it
reinforced my thinking that maybe Mutt was doing something wrong
or I had
* On 2002.05.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* John Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and using the default $quote_regexp and Mutt's built-in pager,
why do the following lines show up in different colors?
This is in quoted color
| This is in quoted1 color
: This is in quoted2 color
} This
* On 2002.05.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Aleksey Tsalolikhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it me or does the Shell Command function use /bin/sh
to execute commands regardless of the value of my SHELL
variable?
It uses EXECSHELL. See `mutt -v` for EXECSHELL's value -- it's
* On 2002.05.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Mutt for a couple of months now. Great piece of
software.
Now there are just a few small configuration details left.
[1234]) How do I [...] with one keypress?
With the macro command.
* On 2002.05.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* V K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm a pine user, but i want to know if mutt can
handle many pop accounts?,
Not really, or rather, depends.
Mutt isn't designed to download mail, use fetchmail etc for this, but it
It is; this is just not
* On 2002.05.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Jose Hidalgo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i'm a pine user, but i want to know if mutt can
handle many pop accounts?,
Yes, many.
If you use POP folder browsing, it can handle as many as you like with
no particular overhead.
mutt -f
* On 2002.05.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Jose Hidalgo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bash# mutt -f pop://eo.yifan.net
pop://eo.yifan.net/: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
the_one_true_shell$ mutt -v | egrep 'Mutt|POP'
Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13)
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY;
* On 2002.04.22, in 20020423004208.GA10973@bernard,
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to do it, with this ugly hack :
...
but I feel it's not the best solution ;)
Did you try my patch? It should make it pretty easy.
set attribution=if [ %[%w] = 1 ]; then echo -n
* On 2002.04.24, in 20020424212120.GA7108@bernard,
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set attribution=if [ %[%w] = 1 ]; then echo -n \D'al %%d, %%n en deus
skrivet:%%\; else echo -n \D'ar %%d, %%n en deus skrivet:%%\; fi |
It works, thank you !
But I want it to apply in a
* On 2002.04.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Dave Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance making it adding the information as an additional X- header?
Well, I've asked. Well see what happens. For the moment, it appears
to have stopped doing it - whether that's due to complaints
* On 2002.04.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway, if someone with a non-FQDN MID
has a problem with his email setup then
I'd not help him unless he gets one.
same goes for people using pseudo names.
end of story.
The thing is, this isn't the
RFP == Rob Feztaa Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RFP Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
RFP On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:13:31PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
RFP Then use the message-hooks idea that I posted, but replace the
RFP `date +%m` bit with something that gives you the day-of-month
* On 2002.04.18, in 20020418175408.GA@watcher,
* keeper1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a pop3 mail account. I currently use fetchmail with mutt. Is pop3
support built into mutt? Which is better to use with mutt, fetchmail or
the pop3 support? I also use procmail. Any hints will be
* On 2002.04.18, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* mstevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record: the complete solution to achieve an Outlook-like behavior
(yuck) with mutt is
set header
set indent_string=
set attribution=- Original message -
It works like a charm.
* On 2002.04.18, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone suggest why this dont include the signature in the email:
[eric@cherry ~] 1 $ mutt eric@localhost -s'test signature when mailing from command
line'/etc/passwd -F /tmp/sig
cat /tmp/sig
set
* On 2002.04.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then how about ^[^a-z]+$ ? That would match anything that contained
only non-lowercase-letters, wouldn't it?
No, because mutt makes that a case-insensitive match since the pattern
contains only
* On 2002.04.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have another question: Is the automatic encryption of emails
if a key is available possible? I think about somethink
Not really: mutt won't know whether the key is available until it tries
to
* On 2002.04.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Kai Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder
name is used. Most of the stuff is done by $MATCH.
But a script for doing subscribe and list informations for .muttrc
would be nice.
* On 2002.04.11, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11-Apr-02 at 12:55, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists.
Participation is expected, not
just one way communication.
Actually, the custom is to reply to
* On 2002.04.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
I want to do it manually if at all.
Putt into your muttrc file:
set pgp_verify_sig=no
macro index \Cv
* On 2002.04.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Andre Bonhote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, mutt users!
I recently received a mail with about 20 attached files. The sender
didn't want to tar it, so I got them attached one by one.
You can imagine that saving was quite annoying.
Is
* On 2002.04.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but tagging all 20 messages, pressing tag-prefixsave-entry
(probably ;s), and pressing enter 20 times should be less painless.
s/nless/nful/
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity
* On 2002.04.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is
using? I don't get the perl source bit...
Oops. I did mean mutt's regex.c -- just a typo.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSIT
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:43:54PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
| Message-ID: 20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY
| User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
broken MID and old mutt version.
upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is not mandatory,
and the Message-ID
* On 2002.04.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi
% clones etc.
Agreed; a little perl one-liner was what I had in mind, since I vaguely
recall that
* On 2002.04.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seriously, though - i'd prefer a simple mapping for vim.
no need to abuse the editor variable here. and i'd
You can do that nothing about this solution prevents it.
rather add a clean command which
* On 2002.04.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
03-Apr-02 at 16:47, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
but maybe it's just that our Solaris machines
don't have proper locales installed. actually,
the local installation drives me up the wall.
this
* On 2002.04.04, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want
to be able to highlight an email from them, and click Send it
to this person, but it isn't a reply - if that makes sense.
i once
* On 2002.04.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
01-Apr-02 at 18:57, Robert Chien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a CGI/Perl script to move
folders from one IMAP server to another IMAP server. I would
Err... why are you
* On 2002.04.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:56:41PM +, Simon White wrote:
All my mailboxes are IMAP, so I don't have this problem, since I'm always
connected to the server. However, I have a fairly short
* On 2002.04.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may sound funny, but I really saw some Linux guys talking about what
would be necessary to replace a kernel 'on the fly'. Not that it does
make lots of sence or is extraordinary usefull, but to some of
* On 2002.03.29, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SunOS 5.8 is a component of the Solaris operating environment. Guess
what OS stands for? SunOS 5.8 is the KERNEL, not the operating
environment.
That's not actually true. SunOS refers to the kernel and
* On 2002.03.29, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600:
No, not really. It's marketing.
The definition of OS isn't marketing, it's Computer Science. It's
been presented
* On 2002.03.27, in 20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab,
* cruciatuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing
email. i checked the date command and my bios-configuration, and both
are ok. where else do i have to check in order to
* On 2002.03.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apropos:
anyone have a utility to calculate the
number of days between two given dates?
i mean - easily? no perl script
with dozens of modules, please!
shell$ ./timediff Wed Mar 27 17:33:00 2002 Wed Mar
* On 2002.03.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
$ TIMEFMT=%D ./timediff 4/6/67 3/28/02
Difference is 11773.96 days.
Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong.
1967-04-06 to
* On 2002.03.25, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 21:22]:
25-Mar-02 at 02:00, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
seriously - mutt sends email. that's it.
if your users don't read their emails right away
* On 2002.03.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It thought Solaris users use text-based mail clients because workstation
installations of Solaris are not the fastest. Or do they just replace
I thought we used text-based mail clients for the same reasons as
* On 2002.03.21, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Jerry Van Brimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's log file is.
Do you know?
Sendmail doesn't keep an independent log file. All its logs are routed
through the syslog service, so the only
* On 2002.03.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
own commands. Something like:
define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
define my-command-2
* On 2002.03.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tres Hofmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-20 08:04]:
I'm wondering if there's a way to bind
complete and complete-query to the same key,
rather than two keys as shown in the manual:
you cannot bind
* On 2002.03.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 5:02 PM EST on March 19 David Champion sent off:
But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees
an encrypted message, it cannot know whether the message also is signed.
Doesn't
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28
still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
Lars
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(sorry, I don't read mutt-dev anymore, I'm getting more than 500
mails a day (obviously I can only skim through the subjects and
read only a subset...))
Lars doesn't read mutt-users anymore for the same
* On 2002.03.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Brian C. Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when compiling 1.3.28
with gcc 3.0.4 (64-bit) mode.
Any ideas?
I don't know much about this particularly, but all the problems I've had
while using gcc 3.x were
* On 2002.03.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
specified
On 2002.03.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again for all the help and suggestions. The problem was indeed
ncurses. I installed it into my home dir and mutt built perfectly.
But I can't keep it, since it takes up a good percentage of my quota.
On 2002.03.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt doesn't need any of the
ncurses libraries at all after the binary is built?
./mutt:
-lintl.1 = /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.1
-liconv.2 =
On 2002.03.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I was thinking more about how mutt will know to look for
everything in the system directories. I was thinking of building mutt
and just copying the binary into ~/bin.
My mutt only needs the
I hadn't really meant to make this a mutt-users topic, but
On 2002.03.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an ideal world:
$ ./configure --enable-liability --disable-benefit
Perhaps. So why doesn't mutt include every patch available as a
configure
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
David Champion has
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!
He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine, but Sven
probably sends mail more broadly than I do.
--
-D.[EMAIL
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob McLaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is
as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments?
I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have
On 2002.03.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew P. Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email
address?
I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm
getting a second useless mail unless I manually remove
On 2002.02.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fmt is very inadequate, compared to 'gq', when it comes to wrapping
of quoted lines. just try it, you will see.
Yes, but to get gq, I have to use vim. That's even worse. I recommend
par if you feel that fmt is not
On 2002.02.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
MuttER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-26-02 08:32] crowed:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote:
The short answer to your question is simply that you need to have an MTA
that will queue up your mail for shipment
301 - 400 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
