Hi there,
I have a system with a Gigabyte GA-8IPE1000-G Motherboard, this
motherboard has an onboard Gigabit Ethernet card which Windows 2000
detects as a Marvell Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T Adapter,
Copper RJ-45. Linux however picks it up as an Intel Chipset adapter.
This is causi
John Richard Smith wrote:
Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Sunday 30 May 2004 10:53 pm, frankieh wrote:
My question is: Will the chipset itself (nforce2) run ok on mandrake
9.2 and 10 ???
Yep. I have been using a NForce2 (Asus A7N8X-Deluxe) mobo since 9.0
and it works great. 9.1 needed to come out
Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Sunday 30 May 2004 10:53 pm, frankieh wrote:
My question is: Will the chipset itself (nforce2) run ok on mandrake
9.2 and 10 ???
Yep. I have been using a NForce2 (Asus A7N8X-Deluxe) mobo since 9.0 and it
works great. 9.1 needed to come out to use the onboard LAN, S
On Sunday 30 May 2004 10:53 pm, frankieh wrote:
> My question is: Will the chipset itself (nforce2) run ok on mandrake
> 9.2 and 10 ???
Yep. I have been using a NForce2 (Asus A7N8X-Deluxe) mobo since 9.0 and it
works great. 9.1 needed to come out to use the onboard LAN, Soundcard, and
hardware
frankieh wrote:
Also of interest to me is the SATA raid as I'd like to setup future
servers to use striping/mirroring, but only if its software transparent.
(So I mean is the RAID provided by these boards the same as pluggin in
a SCSI raid controller such that linux will then see the drives as
Hi Guys,
I have a small problem I'd like to get some advice on.
I'm expected to repair a server that was delivered some time back, and
it had a fried motherboard.
The CPU in the system is an Athlon 1.2gig (Thunderbird).
So I went to my wholesalers, and all they are selling now is Nforce2 and
SIS
Hello,
I'm planning on buying a new box, and I was wondering if Mandrake 9.1
would work with the following motherboard (I checked the "supported
hardware" page, but am such a newbie I wasn't even sure to fully
understand the answer I got):
INTEL SILVER REEF D845PESVL - 2 DDR 333 - 6 PCI - Integ
On Friday 30 May 2003 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to ask anyone ever use that motherboard in Mandrake?
> The motherboard has firewire technology, is it working with
> mandrake? I am looking forward to a favorable reply from you. Thank
> you.
>
> Eko Budiharto.
I have a
On Friday May 30 2003 09:32 am, Gilligan wrote:
> Do you or anyone have a "best" MB for an using with AMD chip ?
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_869_4348,00.html
Look on the right side of the page for 'Recommended
Motherboards'. Enter the proccessor you i
Asus A7V8X with an AMD 2200+ and 512Mb DDR Ram runs excellent. Allk devices were
detected by Mandrake 9.1. Nothing custom to do, no recompiling of any driver modules,
Nada. System is rock-solid stable and quick.
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 5/30/2003 at 10:32 AM Gilligan
Do you or anyone have a "best" MB for an using with AMD chip ?
I have the Abit IT-7 but it does not work under Mandrake. :( Need drivers so LM
can see the hard drives. (never though about that when I bought it. Live and
learn)
Thanks
Doug
Rob Blomquist wrote:
> I have an A7N8X Deluxe Mobo and I
On Thursday May 29 2003 07:14 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> Only trouble I had is having to install my Gigabit drivers from
> teh accompanying CD for the mobo itself. Has drivers on it.
> Strangely I cannot find updated/other drivers for this 3com
> built-in NIC. Has built-in sound too...which I don'
On Thursday 29 May 2003 02:43 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> I am dual booting windows, but thats besides the point. I want to have
> full compatibility with upcoming games. I will be playing them through
> winex, and I'm sure that most upcoming games will use Directx 9.0. Maybe
> then I should go for
At 06:43 PM 5/29/2003 +, you wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2003 19:22:14 -0400
I am dual booting windows, but thats besides the point. I want to have
full compatibility with upcoming games. I will be playing them through
winex, and I'm sure that most upcoming games will use Directx 9.0. Maybe
then I s
At 09:44 AM 5/29/2003 +0100, you wrote:
OK Tom, so you favour Via and AMD, but if money is not in itself a
particular problem, though everything has to be reasonably equal, and
relative, what would be the best combination of mobo cpu and video card
for good graphics, speed and efficiency of FSB
At 07:48 PM 5/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Wednesday May 28 2003 06:45 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4c800-d/overview.htm
>
> i have that board.
>
> has more than I need + an upgrade path.
> -
> FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
I've read that the new
On Thursday 29 May 2003 02:43 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> About your 1700+, does it
> perform the same as a non oc'd 2400+ would perform?
Yes, for all intents and purposes, it is a 2400+.
--
Greg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Thu, 29 May 2003 19:22:14 -0400
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think any KT400 board should do. If you want to be sure on the video, get
> nVidia. You never said if you were going to dual-boot windows, but if you're
> not, will dx9 really matter?
I am dual booting windows, but t
On Thursday 29 May 2003 01:05 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
>
> How about an AOpen AK77-8XN? It isn't too expensive, has 8x AGP support
> and the KT400 chipset. I am thinking about pairing it with an Athlon
> 2200+ and oc'ing it with Greg's advice. Does this sound good with a
> Radeon 9500 Pro? I do kno
On Thursday May 29 2003 03:44 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
> OK Tom, so you favour Via and AMD, but if money is not in itself
> a particular problem, though everything has to be reasonably
> equal, and relative, what would be the best combination of mobo
> cpu and video card for good graphics, spe
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Wednesday May 28 2003 01:10 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
Actually, I didn't really want an nforce2 motherboard. I just
went for this one because it had AGP 8x and got high reviews.
Could anyone point me to a motherboard that works well with
linux, is not too terribly expensiv
On Wednesday May 28 2003 06:45 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socket478/p4c800-d/overview.htm
>
> i have that board.
>
> has more than I need + an upgrade path.
> -
> FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
I've read that the newest i875 chipset is decent. Please keep
On Wednesday May 28 2003 01:10 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> Actually, I didn't really want an nforce2 motherboard. I just
> went for this one because it had AGP 8x and got high reviews.
> Could anyone point me to a motherboard that works well with
> linux, is not too terribly expensive, and has suppo
I have used only one brand of MB.
ASUS. I highly recommend their product.
I have used ASUS for Linux,Win garbage and Solaris X86.
All with ZERO problems.
John Drouhard wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003 18:05:19 -0500
Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The nForce(2) chipsets are
At 06:10 PM 5/28/2003 +, you wrote:
Actually, I didn't really want an nforce2 motherboard. I just went for
this one because it had AGP 8x and got high reviews. Could anyone point
me to a motherboard that works well with linux, is not too terribly
expensive, and has support for AGP 8x (I am go
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 02:10 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003 18:05:19 -0500
>
> Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The nForce(2) chipsets are not well or completely supported by
> > Linux kernel yet. Neither are Intel i. VIA chipsets
> > boards are best supported, mainl
At 07:00 PM 5/28/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 12:53 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> I was considering upgrading my computer with a new motherboard and
> processor. I was highly considering the Asus A7N8X which uses the
> nforce2 chip set. It does not, however, have on-board video, so
I have the ASUS A7N8X MB and have no problems but did have to patch the kernel
for the onbroad lan but that was easy as installing a driver in windows.
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 4:53 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> I was considering upgrading my computer with a new motherboard and
> processor. I was hi
On Wed, 28 May 2003 18:05:19 -0500
Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The nForce(2) chipsets are not well or completely supported by
> Linux kernel yet. Neither are Intel i. VIA chipsets
> boards are best supported, mainly due to their popularity and
> cooperation with the Linux commun
On Wednesday May 28 2003 11:53 am, John Drouhard wrote:
> I was considering upgrading my computer with a new motherboard
> and processor. I was highly considering the Asus A7N8X which uses
> the nforce2 chip set. It does not, however, have on-board video,
> so i was gonna get a radeon 9500 pro and
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 12:53 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> I was considering upgrading my computer with a new motherboard and
> processor. I was highly considering the Asus A7N8X which uses the
> nforce2 chip set. It does not, however, have on-board video, so i was
> gonna get a radeon 9500 pro and
I was considering upgrading my computer with a new motherboard and
processor. I was highly considering the Asus A7N8X which uses the
nforce2 chip set. It does not, however, have on-board video, so i was
gonna get a radeon 9500 pro and use the FireGL drivers. Does anyone know
if this motherboard wit
Charles A Edwards wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:50:49 +0200
> Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello g,
> >
> > Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 12:57:59 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > g> it will be marked on mainboard.
> >
> > That's what I thougt! But the question is: Where? :-)
> > I've
robert,
out of curiosity, what vintage cpu is mainboard?
some of early models will be very difficult to find parts for, and an
extreme amount of early models had cards that even compaq dealers were
not given info on.
compaq, dell, gateway, hp, sony, all started out with their own oem
cards for
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:50:49 +0200
Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello g,
>
> Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 12:57:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> g> it will be marked on mainboard.
>
> That's what I thougt! But the question is: Where? :-)
> I've spotted a sign there which reads: Processor
Hello g,
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 12:57:59 PM, you wrote:
g> it will be marked on mainboard.
That's what I thougt! But the question is: Where? :-)
I've spotted a sign there which reads: Processor Board, Diagram No.
003769. Does it have anything to do with the motherboard name?
BTW, its the
Robert Golovniov wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
>Just a little question: Where do I get the name of my PC's
>motherboard?
it will be marked on mainboard.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
think green... save a tree, save a life, save time, save bandwidth,
save storage. send email, text/plai
Hello List,
Just a little question: Where do I get the name of my PC's
motherboard?
--
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=Robert Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
~
PGP public key: 0x633F6D
I want to upgrade my MoBo/Processor to something more powerful, currently I
use a Cyrix MII 300. Does a MoBo replacement necessitate a reinstall of
Mandrake or will all work fine with the new board/Processor?
I am probably looking at a Duron 1GHz board.
Mark
Want to buy your Pack or
h the OS and hardware vendor) would be 'The
only operating systems supported on that model are Windows 98/ME/NT4.0 Workstation...'.
-Original Message-
From: Paul RodrÃguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Nov 2001 16:34:00 -0500
Subject: Re
I'm sure there are many opinions about this, and what Dell calls a 'server' and
what I think of as server components may not be the same, AND there are
esoteric hardware distinctions that I do not know. Servers are optimized for
speed and fault-tolerance. This means considering the type of process
What exactly differentiates server grade hardware and desktop grade?
I ask this because checking out some Dell servers (just above the price
range for this project, but wrangleable) they seem to be pretty much the
same hardware I would find in a desktop computer. IDE drives for
example, and not
D experience has been
with Windows and NetWare.)
-Original Message-
From: Paul RodrÃguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Nov 2001 19:56:35 -0500
Subject: Re: [newbie] motherboard suggestion for stable system
Thanks, Jim. Your reccomendations have be
used removable hard drives,
> I need to ask whether or not this needs to be integrated into the case
> or can be added to later.
>
> Subject: [newbie] motherboard suggestion for stable system
> >
> > I am building a system for the doctor's private practice. Stabillity is
ooling fans.
>
> Compaq and IBM both sell very Linux-friendly server lines. Dell and (I think) HP
>also support Linux on their server products. I personally would recommend the Compaq
>Proliant line.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Rodríguez <[EMAIL
ez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Nov 2001 17:02:19 -0500
Subject: [newbie] motherboard suggestion for stable system
I am building a system for the doctor's private practice. Stabillity is
the number one concern. We will have windows and linux run
On 10 Nov 2001, Paul [ISO-8859-1] Rodríguez wrote:
> I am building a system for the doctor's private practice. Stabillity is
> the number one concern. We will have windows and linux running on
> separate hard drives untill we can tansition the database to Linux,
> after which, I'd like to have
I am building a system for the doctor's private practice. Stabillity is
the number one concern. We will have windows and linux running on
separate hard drives untill we can tansition the database to Linux,
after which, I'd like to have a RAID system for increased data
reliabillity.
Do you hav
X-RebelTech Is Here: www.rebeltech.ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
yes, i get a ton of listings for i2c in that dir.
i also get a bunch in /dev rather than /proc
i added the lines in rc.local and modules.conf at the end, so that sounds ok.
ye
Hi all,
I just got the abit kt7a mb with the via chipset and a Duron 900, and I was
wondering if there is a linux app for the hardware monitor,,, ie I want to
have the cpu and system temp monitored and if it goes over a predefined
amount, the system shutsdown? I know that the windows version of
On Thursday 21 June 2001 06:32 am, Franki wrote:
>
> Only thing is, I don't think it is making use of the ATA100 yet, it
> still seems to be using ATA33...
>
> Have to play with that unless someone has any suggestions...
What does 'hdparm -i /dev/hd?' and 'hdparm -v /dev/hd?
say (as root)? (
> After making sure that I didn't change any of the drives.. (ie primary
> master stayed primary master.)
Congrats!!
> I booted it and it worked flawlessly, far simplier then if I had done it in
> Winblows..
>
>
> Only thing is, I don't think it is making use of the ATA100 yet, it still
> seem
Hi all,
I mentioned the other day that I got a new Abit MB and Duron 900 CPU,
well, I replaced the overclocked Celeron and BX MB
After making sure that I didn't change any of the drives.. (ie primary
master stayed primary master.)
I booted it and it worked flawlessly, far simplier then if I ha
Warning: this is off topic for the list.
>> Speedman wrote
On top of that even w/ only loading the drivers I have seen a number of
machines stop booting until the Creative card was removed.
I have a Compaq 7471 that I have done a lot of hardware upgrading to. About
2 weeks ago I attempted to rei
On Friday 08 June 2001 12:18 pm, Mark Stewart wrote:
> > > The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge. This means most
> > > modern KT133As and Apollo Pros. That is a large portion of the
> >
> > Motherboard
> >
> > > Market
>
> Really? I bought a Tyan Trinity 400 S1854 specifically t
> The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge. This means most
> modern KT133As and Apollo Pros. That is a large portion of the Motherboard
> Market
That's nice to read, I recently bought Abit a KT7A. :~(
I should have known this before...
What disadvantages did I get, Civileme?
M
>
> > The chipset to avoid is VIA with the 686B Southbridge. This means most
> > modern KT133As and Apollo Pros. That is a large portion of the
> Motherboard
> > Market
Really? I bought a Tyan Trinity 400 S1854 specifically to run Mandrake. The
spec sheets lists the chipset as VIA Apollo Pro
On Friday 08 June 2001 09:38, SpeedMan wrote:
> On June 8, 2001 08:55 am, you wrote:
> > Question, in the machines mentioned below did you use the 80wire
> > connection cables on your hard drives or the old standard 40 wire cables?
> > From what I have read on the net this can become an issue wit
On June 8, 2001 08:55 am, you wrote:
> Question, in the machines mentioned below did you use the 80wire connection
> cables on your hard drives or the old standard 40 wire cables? From what I
> have read on the net this can become an issue with CDROM drives and via
> chipsets if the 40wire cable
On Thursday 07 June 2001 19:20, s wrote:
> Seems I have to replace my mobo, an Abit SE6 due to a blown ps/2 port and
> can't hold out the 2 or 3 weeks for warranty service. So, which chipset is
> it that we should avoid?
>
> I'd like to continue to use my current hardware which is exclusively ide
Seems I have to replace my mobo, an Abit SE6 due to a blown ps/2 port and
can't hold out the 2 or 3 weeks for warranty service. So, which chipset is
it that we should avoid?
I'd like to continue to use my current hardware which is exclusively ide,
sdram 133 and pIII cpu. Any suggestions for
o the game.
-rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don W. Jenkins
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 7:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
My 2cents-I have been trying to get 7.2 to install on a BCM
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
On Thursday 01 February 2001 08:15 am, Mark Johnson wrote:
> I checked the mandrake site for MB compatibility but couldn'
ary 01, 2001 7:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
> I'm glad to hear that the Asus P5A and AMD K6II-500 is a good combo as
I'm
> presently about to upgrade to that very setup. Anyone have any idea as
to
> whether I would
: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
I'm glad to hear that the Asus P5A and AMD K6II-500 is a good combo as I'm
presently about to upgrade to that very setup. Anyone have any idea as to
whether I would be likely to get this for less than $US 150 anywhere? - the
price Directron.com
nt: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
On Thursday 01 February 2001 05:47 pm, Romanator wrote:
> I own two Dell computers and have never had a problem. I think "junk"
> is a little extreme.
They curr
On Thursday 01 February 2001 05:47 pm, Romanator wrote:
> I own two Dell computers and have never had a problem. I think "junk"
> is a little extreme.
They currently have an add on TV for a 933mhz PIII for $999. A lot
of built in junk on a Dell motherboard. Yes, the supplier for the
board
On Thursday 01 February 2001 07:15, you wrote:
> I checked the mandrake site for MB compatibility but couldn't find any
> information. I was planning on getting an Asus ATX Super7 5/2 [P5A] does
> anyone anticipate problems. I had a gigabyte board and linux refused to
> install with the CDROM I
was so hilarious how the MB just expolded
> into tiny bits!!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
>
> On Thursd
iginal Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] motherboard compatibility: asus
On Thursday 01 February 2001 08:15 am, Mark Johnson wrote:
> I checked the mandrake site for MB compatibility but coul
I'll 2nd that. I'm running 2 linux boxes with the P5A & AMD 500Mhz K6/2.
Always had smooth installs from LM6.0 to LM7.2.
Seve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<&
Mark,
I am using the AT version of this board (P5A-B)with a K62/450 and have not
had any problems . Ati Expert98 agp, 256 meg ram
Jim
On Thursday 01 February 2001 09:15, you wrote:
> I checked the mandrake site for MB compatibility but couldn't find any
> information. I was planning o
I checked the mandrake site for MB compatibility but couldn't find any
information. I was planning on getting an Asus ATX Super7 5/2 [P5A] does
anyone anticipate problems. I had a gigabyte board and linux refused to
install with the CDROM I got for it. It installed fine when I tried the
same CD
Sure.
lm_sensors, their homepage is: http://www.netroedge.com/~lm78/. It's not abit
BP6 specific; should work on most PII's and higher.
Don't ask me to give you any help installing it however; I never got around to
installing it myself. ps: I use the same mobo. It rocks, doesn't it? :-)
On Mar
Hi! Is there a CPU monitoring tool for my Abit BP6 for Linux?
Thanks in advance!
John
I was wondering if anybody else is using the Abit BH6 motherboard. I am
having a problem with Linux where the mouse works fine in the console (text
only, not in Xwin) and then when I start Xwin my mouse craps out and just
jumps around all over the screen. I have tried stopping the GPM service an
76 matches
Mail list logo
