On Tuesday 25 January 2005 19:54, Andy Yankovich wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that, even tho I use Opera (or Firefox)
> as my primary web browser, Konqueror remains my primary (only?)
> file manager?
> Andy
In the Linux world you have a lot of choice.
Konqueror is the file Manager supplied wi
ooops big nite drinking, that should be mc not MC - happy Australia day
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 07:59, Andrewd wrote:
> Or if you open your console and type MC you will open a program called
> midnight commander, which is a great file manager
> Andrew D
>
> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:54, Andy Yankov
Or if you open your console and type MC you will open a program called
midnight commander, which is a great file manager
Andrew D
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:54, Andy Yankovich wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that, even tho I use Opera (or Firefox)
> as my primary web browser, Konqueror remains my
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:54:54 -0500
Andy Yankovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that, even tho I use Opera (or Firefox)
> as my primary web browser, Konqueror remains my primary (only?)
> file manager?
>
If you have KDE installed that is the filemanager that KDE installs
Am I correct in thinking that, even tho I use Opera (or Firefox)
as my primary web browser, Konqueror remains my primary (only?)
file manager?
Andy
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join t
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:54:01 +0300, EE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The opera menu font such File, etc is super tiny and hard to read.
Anybody?
Select "Tools/Preferences/Fonts" and then click on "Interface menus" in
the "Type" column. Then click the "Choose" button and from there you can
select t
On Friday 02 Jul 2004 13:54, EE wrote:
> Guys/Gals
>
> The opera menu font such File, etc is super tiny and hard to read.
> Anybody?
>
> BRgd
Tools>Preferences>Fonts>InterfaceMenus>Choose
Make sure the font you select is present on the computer
derek
--
www.jennings.homelinux.net
http://twiki.m
On Thursday 27 May 2004 11:44 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:54:19 -0600
>
> Ron Hunter-Duvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 27, 2004 03:05, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 May 2004 05:34, rikona wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Compounding the problem is the wides
On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:54:19 -0600
Ron Hunter-Duvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 27, 2004 03:05, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 May 2004 05:34, rikona wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Compounding the problem is the widespread need to lie about
> > > browser type. This simply adds to the st
On Thursday 27 May 2004 05:34, rikona wrote:
> Compounding the problem is the widespread need to lie about
> browser type. This simply adds to the statistics favoring IE, and
> make them LESS likely to change when they look at the numbers.
> Some have told me less than 1% of users are non-IE! May
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:20, rikona wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 8:13:40 AM, you wrote:
>
> GM> I occasionally run into this and have found that sometimes it is
> GM> because of the site designer writing the code to IE, and although
> GM> the site doesn't block you because o
Hello David,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 7:14:32 PM, you wrote:
DBW> I have tried all of the "hints" from Opera and none work.
If it's IE-specific code it will not work well, or at all. If Opera
fixes it with a work-around, a later M$ "update" will fix the
"problem" of Opera being able to work. :-(
Hello Greg,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 8:13:40 AM, you wrote:
GM> I occasionally run into this and have found that sometimes it is
GM> because of the site designer writing the code to IE, and although
GM> the site doesn't block you because opera handles the javascript
GM> in a standards compliant
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 07:23 pm, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> On May 25, 2004 20:08, David B. Williams wrote:
> > I've been down this path before and as usual I can't for the life of me
> > remember what it was I did to fix it. So any help is appreciated.
> >
> > The bank that I use for my personal
On May 25, 2004 20:08, David B. Williams wrote:
> I've been down this path before and as usual I can't for the life of me
> remember what it was I did to fix it. So any help is appreciated.
>
> The bank that I use for my personal accounts will accept Opera as the
> browser just fine. The bank that
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 10:08 pm, David B. Williams wrote:
> I've been down this path before and as usual I can't for the life of me
> remember what it was I did to fix it. So any help is appreciated.
>
> The bank that I use for my personal accounts will accept Opera as the
> browser just fine. The
I've been down this path before and as usual I can't for the life of me
remember what it was I did to fix it. So any help is appreciated.
The bank that I use for my personal accounts will accept Opera as the browser
just fine. The bank that I use for my business accounts will not.
I moved to Op
On Sunday 23 May 2004 15:51, Derek Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday 23 May 2004 09:05, Steve Mansfield wrote:
> SNIP
>
> > I like Opera a lot, but I wish they'd produce a 'lite' version
> > which was just a browser, the way Mozilla has done with
> > Firebird/Firefox. That said (and talking about deadwei
On Sunday 23 May 2004 09:05, Steve Mansfield wrote:
SNIP
>
> I like Opera a lot, but I wish they'd produce a 'lite' version which was
> just a browser, the way Mozilla has done with Firebird/Firefox. That said
> (and talking about deadweight) I have Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, Firebird
> and Firefox
---
On Sunday 23 May 2004 00:56, Erylon Hines wrote:
| To keep this on topic, Opera 7.5 is an excellent browser with a very
| attractive interface. The Opera folks did a good job and deserve the
| praise.
Absolutely right - my point is that I like each job to be done by a separat
On Saturday 22 May 2004 09:53 am, Steve Mansfield wrote:
> ---
>
> On Saturday 22 May 2004 15:55, Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> I'm with you there. I'm running SpamAssassin to filter out junk, but before
> mails get to the SA filter in Kmail they first go through a bunch of
> others. Kmail
---
On Saturday 22 May 2004 15:55, Greg Meyer wrote:
| On Saturday 22 May 2004 12:38 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
| > >>Anyone else have any feeling on it?
| > >
| > >Love it (I don't use m2 though). Worth every penny.
| >
| > Is there a specific reason you're not using it for mail
On Fri, 21 May 2004 13:25:33 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running
on Linux.
Anyone else have any feeling on it?
FWIW, I like and use it.
The Other
---
On Saturday 22 May 2004 09:50, David Robertson wrote:
| Like others, I find Opera fast, and I like the interface. The fonts look
| terrible, though - changing them in preferences doesn't seem to make a
| difference, so am I missing some other way?
Once you've selected your pref
Like others, I find Opera fast, and I like the interface. The fonts look
terrible, though - changing them in preferences doesn't seem to make a
difference, so am I missing some other way?
David
--
Unitam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on
Linux.
Anyone else have any feeling on it?
I'm using Thunderbird right now and I'm pret
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2004 01:25 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on Linux.
Anyone else have any feeling on
- Original Message -
From: Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:55:46 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Opera
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 13:25, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 13:25, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
> better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on Linux.
>
> Anyone else have any feeling on it?
>
On Friday 21 May 2004 01:25 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
> better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on Linux.
>
> Anyone else have any feeling on it?
Love it (I don't use m2 though). Worth every penny.
On Friday 21 May 2004 19:25, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better
> and better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while
> running on Linux.
>
> Anyone else have any feeling on it?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and
better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on Linux.
Anyone else have any feeling on it?
- --
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ---
I alway preferred Opera as a browser but never got Java or QT
working before. Never cared much. If I had to use 'em I cranked up
Moz.
The latest Opera just works. Out of the box.
Lee
--
User #223705 Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go
Derek Jennings wrote:
/begin advertisement
Its worth giving Opera a try out. Not only is it the fastest browser around
(Ok Yes I know about Dillo and Lynx), but it has a gazillion features other
browsers do not have.
My particular favourite feature is mouse gestures. Navigation by right
clicki
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:53 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
>
> Opera is particularly good for low power machines. Faster than
> Firebird and uses less memory.
> /end advertisement
>
> derek
Derek, I agree completely. Opera is one of my favorites too.
Furthermore : I purchased a license several
On Saturday 30 Aug 2003 7:14 pm, Anarky wrote:
> Aron Smith wrote:
> >>but opera is adware, isn't it?
> >
> >Opera is ad-supported unless you wish to buy the reg code ie:pay $35.oo
> > USD and the ads go away
>
> ummm .. I think I'll stick to Firebird then :)
/begin advertisement
Its worth giv
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 12:17, Marc wrote:
> On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:40 am, Anarky wrote:
> > Marc wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
> > >temperaly slow while web pages are loading. I think that there are some
> other
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:40 am, Anarky wrote:
> Marc wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> > I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
> >temperaly slow while web pages are loading. I think that there are some
other
> >browsers that do the same but I cant say for sure, it
On Saturday 30 August 2003 11:40 am, Anarky wrote:
> Marc wrote:
> > I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
> >temperaly slow while web pages are loading. I think that there are some
> > other browsers that do the same but I cant say for sure, it has been a
> > lon
- Original Message -
From: Anarky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:40:51 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] opera
Marc wrote:
>>
>>
> I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
>temperaly slow while web pa
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:40:51 +0300
Anarky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> > I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
> >temperaly slow while web pages are loading. I think that there are some other
> >browsers that do the same but I can
Marc wrote:
I do this all the time using Opera as a browser, the download seems to
temperaly slow while web pages are loading. I think that there are some other
browsers that do the same but I cant say for sure, it has been a long time
since I used anything other than Opera. You can get
Hi Rikona,
There is a new version of Opera it's on their Website,and
the Rpm's are there.It installed with no problems,and ended up in the
correct short cut folder on the start up in both KDE and Gnome.
http://www.opera.com/products/user/index.dml?platform=linux .You need the
QT Sha
SNIP
>
> I agree with your observations as to Opera should get their manure
> straightened out if they want to retain the Linux community. Having said
> that though, I must add that in spite of the problems, I'm still using
> Opera. I am on a dialup, and Opera is just plain a lot faster than any
>
- Original Message -
From: Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:58:07 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Opera seg fault solution
> By all means comment out the entries. It can do no harm.
>
> Let us know if it helps. I also h
By all means comment out the entries. It can do no harm.
Let us know if it helps. I also have been having random crashes on Opera 6.1
on my test machine. Opera 6.1 seems rather fragile to me, not up to Opera's
usual standard.
With so ,many good browsers like Galeon, Mozilla, and now Phoenix (du
Apropos a previous discussion, this is only on Windows for the moment, but
they've done the near-impossible and produced an email client with new and
very powerful handling.
The concept is that you receive your email as usual but have both
predefined and user-defined views. The email is visible
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:52:14 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have java installed. I included path for plugins in opera. still no jre
> report i get. I didn't find any option in preferences for showing java path.
> How to make it recognize java
first, go to the plug-in page in
I have java installed. I included path for plugins in opera. still no jre
report i get. I didn't find any option in preferences for showing java path.
How to make it recognize java
--
L.V.Gandhi
203, Soundaryalahari Apartments, Lawsons Bay colony, Visakhapatnam, 530017
MECON, 5th Floor, RTC Comp
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 13:09, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 Jul 2002 4:12 pm, Guilherme Cirne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a strange problem. Java has stopped working suddenly in Opera
> > 6.02. It was working perfectly before and it is working perfectly in
> > other browsers (Konqueror and Mozilla
On Tuesday 09 Jul 2002 4:12 pm, Guilherme Cirne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange problem. Java has stopped working suddenly in Opera 6.02.
> It was working perfectly before and it is working perfectly in other
> browsers (Konqueror and Mozilla). I have j2re-1.4.0 installed correctly.
> What happe
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 11:12, Guilherme Cirne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange problem. Java has stopped working suddenly in Opera 6.02. It
> was working perfectly before and it is working perfectly in other browsers
> (Konqueror and Mozilla). I have j2re-1.4.0 installed correctly. What happens
Hi,
I have a strange problem. Java has stopped working suddenly in Opera 6.02. It
was working perfectly before and it is working perfectly in other browsers
(Konqueror and Mozilla). I have j2re-1.4.0 installed correctly. What happens
when I try to load a page that has java is this: the Java Co
Es Diumenge 26 Maig 2002 16:19, en Rodrigo va escriure:
> Hi all,
> Sorry if this is not the right place to ask this.
> I installed the latest opera 6.0 in mdk 8.2 but it doesn't load any page. I
> tried both types of packages, with qt static and shared and the result is
> the same, it hangs with
On Sunday 26 May 2002 11:57, you wrote:
Thanks a lot !!!
That solved the problem !
Rodrigo
> Opera 6 shared works great for me, but I have read of some users who have
> to enable 'Synchronous DNS' in the preferences.
>
> HTH
>
> derek
>
> On Sunday 26 May 2002 3:19 pm, you wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
Opera 6 shared works great for me, but I have read of some users who have to
enable 'Synchronous DNS' in the preferences.
HTH
derek
On Sunday 26 May 2002 3:19 pm, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry if this is not the right place to ask this.
> I installed the latest opera 6.0 in mdk 8.2 but it does
Hi all,
Sorry if this is not the right place to ask this.
I installed the latest opera 6.0 in mdk 8.2 but it doesn't load any page. I
tried both types of packages, with qt static and shared and the result is the
same, it hangs with "looking up host name ... " and never contacts any
host nam
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 16:20, s wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2002 09:19 am, Rich wrote:
> > Opera is my favorite browser, but since installing Mandrake 8.2, it
> > won't work. I downloaded the latest version of Opera 6.0, but still no
> > luck. It opens and then freezes while trying to contact th
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 09:19 am, Rich wrote:
> Opera is my favorite browser, but since installing Mandrake 8.2, it
> won't work. I downloaded the latest version of Opera 6.0, but still no
> luck. It opens and then freezes while trying to contact the home page.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Rich
Well, mi
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sridhar Dhanapalan
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Opera Location Bar
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:31:22 -0500, Donald E Gulmire Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am using Opera for a
Es Wed 06 Feb 2002 18:07, en Richard Holt va escriure:
> Go here to download the full Opera version 5.12, with or without java as
> you prefer: http://www.opera.com/download/ you'll have to change to the
> linux version. or
> http://www.opera.com/download/get.pl?custom=yes&opsys=4&language=5&vers
Thanks. I've signed up for both...
Es Wed 06 Feb 2002 16:07, en Chuck Henson va escriure:
> At 08:07 PM 2/5/02 +0100, you wrote:
> >Does any of you have opera (5, 5.05TP1 or 6TP3) running in spanish
> > language?
> >
> >And Opera doesn't answer...
>
> Well, you might want to join the opera users
Go here to download the full Opera version 5.12, with or without java as you prefer:
http://www.opera.com/download/ you'll have to change to the linux version.
or
http://www.opera.com/download/get.pl?custom=yes&opsys=4&language=5&version=32
the version 6 is well along. I use it under windows; try
At 08:07 PM 2/5/02 +0100, you wrote:
>Does any of you have opera (5, 5.05TP1 or 6TP3) running in spanish language?
>
>And Opera doesn't answer...
Well, you might want to join the opera users mailing list and ask there? I
know I've been using opera for a while now (although with Win versions) off
Es Wed 06 Feb 2002 02:03, en Pascal Goguey va escriure:
> > Does any of you have opera (5, 5.05TP1 or 6TP3) running in spanish
> > language?
> Opera in Spanish is quite rare. Most of the Operas I know of are in Italian
> or German.
Bad luck... i'll have to use NS4 (using MDK7.2 because of slow mac
Le 02.2.6 à 4:07, Joan Tur ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivit:
> Hallo!
>
> Does any of you have opera (5, 5.05TP1 or 6TP3) running in spanish language?
Opera in Spanish is quite rare. Most of the Operas I know of are in Italian
or German.
> And Opera doesn't answer...
Opera never answers. It just p
On 1/5/2002 Paul wrote:
> I am using Opera 6.0 TP2 since a while and it is indeed very good. I just
> can't figure out how to activate Java support in there. In the support pages
> there's a mention of setting it on in the preferences, but I can't find it
> there.
> Have I gone dyslexic? Does any
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:40:41 +, Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>While plugger was busy being updated to work with Opera5.0, the good people
> from Norway released Opera6.0TP2 which seems to work OK with the old
> plugger 3.3
>Since Opera6.0 has a ***much*** better feature set than
The static version has the required QT libraries built into the Opera
package. The dynamic version relies on a separately-installed QT package.
This makes the download smaller, but dependent on the strengths/weaknesses
(compared to the static build) of your installed version of QT.
On Thu, 5
It was Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:21:08 +1000 when Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
>What version of QT do you have running? The latest is 2.3.1 -- I suggest you
>get that from a Cooker mirror near you (don't worry, if anything it should be
>even more stable and usable than the one you have now). Also, try th
What version of QT do you have running? The latest is 2.3.1 -- I suggest you
get that from a Cooker mirror near you (don't worry, if anything it should be
even more stable and usable than the one you have now). Also, try the static
version of Opera.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:05, Siro Belza wrote
At 09.11 29/06/01, you wrote:
> > >>(Of course I must say that for the record, konqueror is still my fav a
> >
> > You have got to try Opera. That is the creme-de-la-crop web browser for
> > Linux.
>
>Opera is very good indeed. I use it as my default browser. But I do have
>to resort to Netscape
Hi all,
Don't know if I am extremely late, but I just got Opera 5.0
It's pretty good as a browser.
Paul
--
Ask not for whom the telephone bell tolls...
if thou art in the bathtub, it tolls for thee.
http://nlpagan.net - Registered Linux User 174403
Linux Mandrake 7.2 - Sylpheed 0.4.66
On Sunday 17 December 2000 04:31, you wrote:
>
> I bet you money that Java will be implemented for the final version...
It already is in the windows version, plus it went semi free, you have a
choice of sponsored mode (with ads) or pay.
--
Alex
(Go easy on me, I'm a COBOL programmer in real l
Yeah, it's a fast sucker ain't it? I use Konqueror most of the time, but I
think Opera is faster, I just don't like the cookie options as well as
Konquerors. I wish they would add a per cookie/occurence choice. If it
weren't for that I would probably buy user's rights to it. (I still might)
jiten wrote:
>
> i installed it yesterday on my mandrake7.2 system. there was two
> versions(static and dynmic)
> . i chosen the static one. but it is giving segmentation fault. anybody
> else having sucess please let me know.
> thanx
> jiten
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jay wrote:
>
> > Just lett
Just letting you know that Opera beta 4 is out for Linux.
http://www.opera.com/linux/
--
Jay
~May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend~
http://www.mrsnooky.com
> Bookmarks??? I thought they handled just fine. When I'm cleaning them up
> and placing them in seperate folders I usually just cut and paste them
> from one place to another. That's the same as I've always done with them
Two things here Mark. First, I wrote that before I figured out that I ca
I'm not sure I understand what you mean about the bookmarks. I've found
the operation of Mozilla M18 to be pretty fair considering that it's not a
finished product yet. As far as performance goes it's almost as fast and
stable as Netscape 4.75. While it still doesn't handle Java yet it is far
less
Larry,
linux.com is a good place to start. There a fair amount of graphics there,
but lynx seems to handle the site just fine.
--
Mark
/* I never worry about the to-jams.
* Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
* it's already too late...just make sure
* you chew them thoro
> :) yes Larry, as a matter of fact there is life after Nutscrape. It's
> called Mozilla. However, until Mozilla is completely finished you might
> want to try getting the tarball of Opera 4b. all it is is a binary inside
> the tarball. Completely standalone and you can run it from your home dir,
> Gecko engine. Personlly I'm going to by-pass Netscape 6 all togther and
> when MoZilla is ready I'm going to use it. It's much nicer than Netscape
> 4.7x and superior to Netscape 6. They're using the same base code but the
Mark...maybe I've got blinders on but what is "much nicer than Netscape
> and felt the need to answer this. I guess you could say that I am a Netscape
> fan -- I use Netscape 4.75 with Mandrake 7.1 on a DSL (yes I have an
Did you find the 4.73 ->4.75 upgrade to be worth the effort?
> excellent firewall ;-) ) and only when I am doing about 10,000 things at once
>
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Joan Tur wrote:
> Dennis Myers escribió:
>
> > Well, I don't understand the problem, cause everything mentioned on the
> > list here I have checked or tried and I still get the different
> > architecture message with the rpm
>
> Since you've got an executable in the tarball
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/14/00, 6:02:27 AM, Larry Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: [newbie] Opera Beta:
> Is there anyon
> Since you've got an executable in the tarball in my opinion it's not very
> important... i just hate to compile a package because if i later don't want
> it in my system it's harder to remove ;-)
This is exactly why I prefer tarballs. I open and compile them in a
directory in my local user sp
"D.M. Mattix (Mike)" escribió:
> use the uname command 'uname -m' . This will give you the machine
> hardware type. I got the same message also and also had the tarball install
> with no problem. I do not know the details of rpm building but I wonder if you
> can build one that checks the mach
Dennis Myers escribió:
> Well, I don't understand the problem, cause everything mentioned on the
> list here I have checked or tried and I still get the different
> architecture message with the rpm
Since you've got an executable in the tarball in my opinion it's not very
important... i just hat
Jay wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > Just to add my two-pennies worth to the thread.
> >
> > I use netscape all the time and it has never crashed yet, quite something
> > when you read some of the complaints on here. Also as I use to have 24 hours
> > online connection for free an
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Just to add my two-pennies worth to the thread.
>
> I use netscape all the time and it has never crashed yet, quite something
> when you read some of the complaints on here. Also as I use to have 24 hours
> online connection for free and it worked perfectly tho
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > I understand that Opera has released the beta of version 4.0. If you're
> > braver than I am, you may wish to give it a try. If so, keep us posted.
> > -- Carroll (not a Netscape fan)
>
> Is there anyone who's a Netscape fan (grin)? It still holds the title as
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Joan Tur wrote:
> Paul escribió:
>
> > It was Oct 14, 2000, 17:59, when Joan Tur keyboarded:
> >
> > >Roger Sherman escribió:
> > >
> > >> http://www.opera.com/download/linux.html
> > >
> > >Er... i'm not able to install the downloaded .rpm. I get an error
> > >message: "pa
> Well for starters I don't use it for e-mail. I prefer Pine or Kmail for that.
As I said, many of my problems with Netscape went away when I stopped
using it for mail.
> with a Cyric MII 300Mhz processor yet I have had no problems what so ever.
> The version of netscape I am using is the on
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Roger Sherman wrote:
> >
>
> Well, I don't understand the problem, cause everything mentioned on the
> list here I have checked or tried and I still get the different
> architecture message with the rpm and an " unexpected EOF and the core
> dump when I try to
Roger Sherman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:59:10 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >Hallo!
> >
> >I've read about it... where can i find the latest beta?
> >
> >Thanx!
>
> http://www.opera.com/download/linux.html
>
> peace,
>
> Rog
> http://www.slammingrooves.com
Well, I don't understand the proble
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > I use netscape all the time and it has never crashed yet, quite something
> > when you read some of the complaints on here. Also as I use to have 24 hours
> > online connection for free and it worked perfectly thoughout hours of use, it
> > is really weird to
> least a 200Mhz machine and 64Mb of RAM you might try a stable Mozilla
> build. You have to watch and pick one from a good day (not to hard, look
> at Mozzilla Zine for help w/ this) but if you do so it runs very stable
> and somewhat quickly. Depending on the day you choose stabilty and speed
A
Andrew Scotchmer wrote:
>
> Just to add my two-pennies worth to the thread.
>
> I use netscape all the time and it has never crashed yet, quite something
> when you read some of the complaints on here. Also as I use to have 24 hours
> online connection for free and it worked perfectly thoughou
> I noticed so. I was going through the settings and it keeled over all of a
> sudden. When NS crashes I have to fire up GPS and kill the remaining core
> of NS, that takes up all the cpu. When Opera dies, it does so gracefully.
This is why I have more time restarting NS than operating Opera :-)
Paul escribió:
> It was Oct 14, 2000, 17:59, when Joan Tur keyboarded:
>
> >Roger Sherman escribió:
> >
> >> http://www.opera.com/download/linux.html
> >
> >Er... i'm not able to install the downloaded .rpm. I get an error
> >message: "package opera-4.0b1-1 is for a different architecture" 8-?
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
