PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux Hardware Database
Sridhar:
Are you aware of another Linux HCL? I sometimes refer to the
Mandrake list,
but sometimes its a good idea to get a second opinion.
-- cmg
On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:42 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Microsoft Apologist
Smiley wrote:
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding re-installation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
I know diskdrake can't do that...
So, any suggestion
the software and do what ever you feel comfortable with out
of the suggestions put forward so far.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: Franki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux W2000
yeah, I'll agree
- Original Message -
From: Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux W2000
partitions, provided it is installed on Windows. I only have V5 which
doesn't support anything past NT, but I think
In my case, has i said before, PM7 worked fine to make a new partition for
my linux.
But first you must do the following steps before using it:
- Scandisk and Defrag
- Backup all you important data (just in case)
Ando go for it!
The worst that can happen is that you'll have to reinstall your
On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 12:05 am, Smiley wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:30:02 -
Aurélio Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smiley:
Don't even think about resizing your win2k partition with diskdrake. It
can mess up your win2k.
I didn't :)
I bought PM6, which is already unsupported by
Smiley wrote:
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
I know diskdrake can't do that...
So, any suggestion
Acronis
It comes with the power pack 9.0
El Mié 01 Ene 2003 23:38, Smiley escribió:
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
- Original Message -
From: John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux W2000
PM6 is no good for partitioning where the windblows made partitions
will be remade for the purpose of linux installs, don't
Guy Rouillier wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux W2000
PM6 is no good for partitioning where the windblows made partitions
will be remade for the purpose
El mié, 01-01-2003 a las 16:38, Smiley escribió:
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
FAT32 or NTFS? If the latter, I can't help you. But if the Win2K
partition is FAT32, then try parted, available at Freshmeat or at:
At 10:41 AM 1/2/2003 +, you wrote:
On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 12:05 am, Smiley wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:30:02 -
Aurélio Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smiley:
Don't even think about resizing your win2k partition with diskdrake. It
can mess up your win2k.
I didn't :)
I bought
not fix it, so I deleted it.. no use for useless software..
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of FemmeFatale
Sent: Friday, 3 January 2003 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux W2000
At 10:41 AM 1/2/2003 +
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 05:38 pm, you wrote:
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
I know diskdrake
10:38 PM
Subject: [newbie] Linux W2000
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
I know diskdrake can't do
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:30:02 -
Aurélio Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smiley:
Don't even think about resizing your win2k partition with diskdrake. It can
mess up your win2k.
I didn't :)
I used partition magic 7 and all worked fine.
I was reported PM 6 could mess all things up;
if 7 is
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux W2000
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:30:02 -
Aurélio Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smiley:
Don't even think about resizing your win2k partition with diskdrake.
It can
mess up your win2k.
I didn't :)
I used partition magic 7 and all worked
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of walt
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux W2000
Just back up any data you need and just start over again..I've had
nothing but trouble with partition magic and resizing partitions without
loosing
At 11:38 PM 1/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi, I know this topic isn't exactly new :)
but I need help in order to allow a friend of
mine to get rid of W2000 :-D
What I need is to know how he can resize
(avoiding reinstallation) of W2000 without
losing any datas...
I know diskdrake can't do that...
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:30 pm, you wrote:
Smiley:
Don't even think about resizing your win2k partition with diskdrake. It can
mess up your win2k.
I used partition magic 7 and all worked fine.
It is o.k. to use diskdrake IF the W2k partition is FAT. If it is NTFS you
shouldn't try
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:05:05 -0800
erylon hines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is o.k. to use diskdrake IF the W2k partition is FAT. If it is NTFS you
shouldn't try it.
Uhm... I was just told diskdrake can resize ntfs partition, but can't move datas;
so defragging on W2000 and being sure how
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 19:05, erylon hines wrote:
snip previous-reply
It is o.k. to use diskdrake IF the W2k partition is FAT. If it is NTFS you
shouldn't try it. Partition Magic will work, but it will only do ext2, and
be careful--it can mess up your partition table (for sure--it
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 06:05 pm, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 19:05, erylon hines wrote:
snip previous-reply
I've used PM for years with my Linux installs, and all I do
is resize the FAT32/NTFS partition(s), and then create the *nix
partitions with the DiskDrake, cfdisk, et al.
On Thursday 26 Dec 2002 6:33 pm, Joeb wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:52:13 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 Dec 2002 2:57 am, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
What does StarOffice6 offer which OpenOffice 1.0.1 cannot do?
Not a lot. There are a few extra modules, which I
I was previously dual-booting Mandrake 9 with Win2K, both OS on separate
hard drives. Mandrake is booting via loader on floppy disk.
I no longer needed windows, so removed its partitions :-)
Only problem is that during boot up, Mandrake keeps complaining that it
is unable to find/mount local
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:42, Kamal Gathani wrote:
I was previously dual-booting Mandrake 9 with Win2K, both OS on separate
hard drives. Mandrake is booting via loader on floppy disk.
I no longer needed windows, so removed its partitions :-)
Only problem is that during boot up, Mandrake
Kamal Gathani wrote:
I was previously dual-booting Mandrake 9 with Win2K, both OS on
separate hard drives. Mandrake is booting via loader on floppy disk.
I no longer needed windows, so removed its partitions :-)
Only problem is that during boot up, Mandrake keeps complaining that
it is
On Thursday 26 Dec 2002 2:01 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Kamal Gathani wrote:
I was previously dual-booting Mandrake 9 with Win2K, both OS on
separate hard drives. Mandrake is booting via loader on floppy disk.
I no longer needed windows, so removed its partitions :-)
Only problem
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 26 Dec 2002 2:01 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Kamal Gathani wrote:
I was previously dual-booting Mandrake 9 with Win2K, both OS on
separate hard drives. Mandrake is booting via loader on floppy disk.
I no longer needed windows, so removed its partitions
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:52:13 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 Dec 2002 2:57 am, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
What does StarOffice6 offer which OpenOffice 1.0.1 cannot do?
Not a lot. There are a few extra modules, which I haven't explored yet, but
look as though
On Wednesday 25 Dec 2002 2:57 am, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
What does StarOffice6 offer which OpenOffice 1.0.1 cannot do?
Not a lot. There are a few extra modules, which I haven't explored yet, but
look as though they are things like a quick access to label templates, etc.
I understood that
On Wednesday 25 December 2002 04:57, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
What does StarOffice6 offer which OpenOffice 1.0.1 cannot do?
AFAIK, a database component, some fonts and graphics, and a free
support hotline for a limited period (after which you pay for
support).
But you're a club member:
On Saturday 21 December 2002 12:18 am, jmarcom wrote:
I had good luck with Earthlink when I was on dial-up, and still
have it
for broadband. Following are my notes for dial-up:
connection name: Earthlink jmarcom
authenticationPAP IP address (provided)
Login
On Tuesday 24 December 2002 11:04, ET wrote:
BTW, they changed the login from a ELN/username to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still login fine with ELN/username.
***
Powered by SuSE Linux 8.0 Professional
KDE 3.0.0 KMail 1.4
This is a Microsoft-free
Charlie wrote:
On December 21, 2002 09:15 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
snip
If there is I don't see it.
John
John;
Open your Mozilla Messenger (mail) client then in the left column highlight
your user account, then on the Mozilla Mail - username@wherever (right)
side click on View
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 12:01 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Your non list mails will not be affected since all mail
clients will address reply mails to the e-mail address they originated
from if a 'Reply To' address is not specified.
Do you mean like this
John
That's better
Thank
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 12:01 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 10:23 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non
Britons,
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 12:01 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Your non list mails will not be affected since all mail
clients will address reply mails to the e-mail address they originated
from if a 'Reply To' address is not specified.
Do you mean like this
John
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 1:00 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
be easier, but if such a policy were possible it has to be specificly
for newbie type
lists because in all other cases you DO want replyto address to be
included in
composer windows.
OK - if you say so :) but I never use the reply
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 1:00 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
be easier, but if such a policy were possible it has to be specificly
for newbie type
lists because in all other cases you DO want replyto address to be
included in
composer windows.
OK - if you say so :) but
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 1:15 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 1:00 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
be easier, but if such a policy were possible it has to be specificly
for newbie type
lists because in all other cases you DO
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:00, K. Spress wrote:
I actually own my own internet company and we offer nationwide US access
and are linux friendly for $19.95 a month. Unlimited service Usenet and 100
Megabytes for Personal Webspace and 10 E Mail Accounts
Kenneth E. Spress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:26 am, Charlie wrote:
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I use Hotmail, alas, only for my public
messages since it is saturated with
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:26 am, Charlie wrote:
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I use Hotmail, alas, only for my public
messages since
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 11:30 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:26 am, Charlie wrote:
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 11:30 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:26 am, Charlie wrote:
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:12, Derek Jennings wrote:
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons, and
will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
-
--snip
boring bit
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:12 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons, and
will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
---
Zz Zz... Only j/k is
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 12:46 pm, David Robertson wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:12, Derek Jennings wrote:
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons,
and will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
SNIP
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons,
and will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
--
-
SNIP
Well, there you are, it's not entirely bunk after all.
One further question
Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons,
and will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
--
-
SNIP
Well, there you are, it's not entirely bunk
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 20 Dec 2002 10:23 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
WARNING - The following text will be of no interest to any non Britons,
and will be tediously boring to anyone who reads it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
My Inbox Happily Received This From Stephen Kuhn @ 20 Dec 2002 16:13:40 +1100
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 16:01, Greg wrote:
Some isp will not give out the dns numbers I have had two like that
Greg
If an ISP (or the idiot tech support person
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 16:46, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
who cares about their DNS servers ?
install pdnsd use the root DNS servers!
Yeah - good point - I remember setting up a full blown internal DNS
server when I lived in Garland, TX to deal with my two incoming cables -
was a great help - ran
I had good luck with Earthlink when I was on dial-up, and still
have it
for broadband. Following are my notes for dial-up:
connection name: Earthlink jmarcom
authenticationPAP IP address (provided)
Login ELN/jmarcom checkmark no autoconfig
host
If an ISP (or the idiot tech support person sitting behind the phone)
won't give you the DNS servers for an ISP, you can get them from
If that ever happens, run away from that ISP. It's like ordering phone
service from the phone company and them not giving you your phone
number.
Want to buy
Some isp will not give out the dns numbers I have had two like that
That's incredible. Imagine the telephone company not telling you what
your phone number is.
Greg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
What I'm trying to fully understand is what exactly does one mean by
stating Linux Compatible ISP.
Well, if they require windows-only software (aol, msn, etc.) they
won't be linux compatible. I'm not sure I wouild even classify aol as
an ISP in the strict sense. They're more like a portal to
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 16:38, David E. Fox wrote:
Assoming you're on a dialup connection - even if you were on DSL -
what's needed (or strongly desired) is static IP, your own host-
name, etc. Vanity hosts aren't strictly necessary, as long as your
hostname is addressable, that's what counts.
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I use Hotmail, alas, only for my public messages
since it is saturated with spam anyway). Ideally, I would look for a
company
Here in Wisconsin (USA) there are lots of options for internet (big cities in
particular), who are REAL internet providers, not quasi like aol...
On Thursday 19 December 2002 03:57 pm, Terry Sheltra wrote:
Andrei,
Check out this website:
On Thursday 19 December 2002 04:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I use Hotmail, alas, only for my public messages
since it is saturated with spam anyway). Ideally, I would look for a
What I'm trying to fully understand is what exactly does one mean by
stating Linux Compatible ISP.
What ISN'T compatible about an ISP?
All you need is a phone number, a username and password. That's all.
That's all that's required.
What else could there be? Two DNS servers, a mail server, a
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:58:09 -0500
Carroll Grigsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
4. I'm planning on upgrading to cable soon, using Earthlink as my ISP
over Time Warner/Cablevision lines. (Less expensive, and more favorable
TOS on what I can do at my end.) My second choice: Earthlink over
try www.eskimo.com
I love them,
eric
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Charlie wrote:
On December 19, 2002 02:23 pm, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Dear friends,
I have recently had the worst of times with my ISP who also is my main
internet address provider (I use Hotmail, alas, only for my public
I have used earthlink in the past and can say I was very happy with them
They even helped me set up my first Linux system for my dial up
I use time warner cable now I did not know earthlink had cable service or I would
have used them
Greg
Terry Sheltra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei,
Some isp will not give out the dns numbers I have had two like that
Greg
What I'm trying to fully understand is what exactly does one mean by
stating Linux Compatible ISP.
What ISN'T compatible about an ISP?
All you need is a phone number, a username and password. That's all.
That's all that's
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 16:01, Greg wrote:
Some isp will not give out the dns numbers I have had two like that
Greg
If an ISP (or the idiot tech support person sitting behind the phone)
won't give you the DNS servers for an ISP, you can get them from
INTERNIC. Every DNS server is registered
]
- Original Message -
From: Terry Sheltra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux-compatible ISP in US sought
Andrei,
Check out this website:
http://www.affinitypath.com/cgi-bin/mi/welcome.cgi?cb=2174
They even
I actually own my own internet company and we offer nationwide US access
and are linux friendly for $19.95 a month. Unlimited service Usenet and 100
Megabytes for Personal Webspace and 10 E Mail Accounts
Kenneth E. Spress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(586) 945-3801
You Finally Have A Choice In Local
At 06:50 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I never thought to go any further on my original answer, which might have
given you some peace of mind on this. I have had one of those weeks, and my
weekend was spent on my knees tearing my network apart and cleaning. (Yuck!
I hate cleaning!) Maybe this
At 06:56 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Femme,
I took a look at your latest post to Spence just before sending off my
response. I have been away from the list because of work, so my time here
has been spotty, at best.
You are right. If you asked for boot-up assigned IP addressing during the
At 06:10 PM 12/15/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I should mention that I didn't install dhcpcd as an add-on stand alone
install. I'm not sure which option I checked during the installation of
Mandrake 9.0 that caused it to be installed but it was ready to go as soon
as the OS installation finished.
On Saturday 14 Dec 2002 9:22 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
FWIW, I had installed 8.2 when we put a router in for the adsl. The
changeover from shared connection to PPPoE was painless, and I have seen
no problems that relate to the router issue. When I upgraded to 9.0 no
problems emerged either.
On Saturday 14 Dec 2002 11:21 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
Ok, sorry, like I said I was behind on the thread. What linux wants is the
static IP of your computer the gateway address whether it is your gateway
or the IPs gateway and the IPs DNS addresses. So if you set up your
internal computer
On Sunday 15 December 2002 03:50 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 14 Dec 2002 11:21 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
Ok, sorry, like I said I was behind on the thread. What linux wants is
the static IP of your computer the gateway address whether it is your
gateway or the IPs gateway and the IPs
You know, I recently had this problem on my LM9 installation, and never
managed to get my router working with it. You probably will, but I
could not be buggered trying any more. It beat me like a dog! But this
is something I feel Mandrake need to really address, as my Red Hat
system configured
At 11:12 PM 12/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I know I'm coming into this thread a little late but I thought I'd throw
my $.02 in anyway. I'm running 9.0 behind a Linksys router that's
operating as a DHCP server and I'm not having any problems accessing the
internet at all. But then, I also have
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:14:09 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:12 PM 12/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I know I'm coming into this thread a little late but I thought I'd throw
my $.02 in anyway. I'm running 9.0 behind a Linksys router that's
operating as a DHCP server and I'm not
$date;
}
exit(0);
END OF SCRIPT ###
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2002 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux installation
FWIW, I had installed 8.2 when we put a router in for the adsl. The
changeover from shared connection to PPPoE was painless, and I have seen no
problems that relate to the router issue. When I upgraded to 9.0 no problems
emerged either.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems on my
At 02:39 AM 12/15/2002 +0800, you wrote:
I had a problem where my pppoe connection was lost two or three times a
day..
Since I use it to host works stuff. I needed it to be able to reconnect
itself..
so I wrote this script.. it needs a few perl modules installed.. but it
works great..
Its
On Saturday 14 December 2002 03:22 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
FWIW, I had installed 8.2 when we put a router in for the adsl. The
changeover from shared connection to PPPoE was painless, and I have seen
no problems that relate to the router issue. When I upgraded to 9.0 no
problems emerged
servers and telling
me when they are down as well.
very handy..
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of FemmeFatale
Sent: Sunday, 15 December 2002 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Linux installation Router Advice
At 03:33 PM 12/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Thx Anne. However my experience has been... Odd.
I went to install linux, everything went fine I chose DHCP connection
as I had always in the past. The Router I use is acting as a DHCP Server
after all, giving out addy's for our comps here.
- Original Message -
From: FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux installation Router Advice
FWIW, I had installed 8.2 when we put a router in for the adsl. The
changeover from shared connection to PPPoE
At 05:46 PM 12/14/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Femme,
For the longest time, I was letting my Lynksys router/firewall/gateway do
the DHCP for my mixed O/S network. During that time, my NT 4.0 Server was
acting as a Primary Domain Control (PDC) and a secured resource center file
sharing between my
On Saturday 14 December 2002 04:40 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 03:33 PM 12/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Thx Anne. However my experience has been... Odd.
I went to install linux, everything went fine I chose DHCP
connection as I had always in the past. The Router I use is acting as
a
I know I'm coming into this thread a little late but I thought I'd throw
my $.02 in anyway. I'm running 9.0 behind a Linksys router that's
operating as a DHCP server and I'm not having any problems accessing the
internet at all. But then, I also have dhcpcd version 1.3.22pl1-3mdk
installed.
All I'm asking is there any special things I need to know when installing
linux behind a router?
I bought one recently, works great with the windows installs... Took some
fiddling but its all good now.
So any special caveats, instructions, advice? warnings?
Thx
-
FemmeFatale
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:18:11 -0700, you wrote:
All I'm asking is there any special things I need to know when installing
linux behind a router?
I bought one recently, works great with the windows installs... Took some
fiddling but its all good now.
So any special caveats, instructions,
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 09:18, FemmeFatale wrote:
All I'm asking is there any special things I need to know when installing
linux behind a router?
I bought one recently, works great with the windows installs... Took some
fiddling but its all good now.
So any special caveats,
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 19:15, Lanman wrote:
Talk about being a mushroom Stephen! No wonder I've seen so many posts
to the list by you! You must have one massive callouse on your typing
finger by now! This Meetup thing might be a good opportunity for you to
get some vitamin D (a.k.a. sunshine),
On Saturday 07 December 2002 03:15 am, Lanman wrote:
Talk about being a mushroom Stephen! No wonder I've seen so many posts
to the list by you! You must have one massive callouse on your typing
finger by now! This Meetup thing might be a good opportunity for you to
get some vitamin D (a.k.a.
Just a quick note for your attention folks, but have any of you attended
a Linux Meetup yet? Meetups are social gatherings of people in your
community who have something in common, in this case Linux.
If you're curious, check out http://linux.meetup.com/ for details. There
is no fee or
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 16:56, Lanman wrote:
Just a quick note for your attention folks, but have any of you attended
a Linux Meetup yet? Meetups are social gatherings of people in your
community who have something in common, in this case Linux.
LINUX + GETTING SOCIAL --- H...strange
Hello,
I'm trying to reinstall linux on a compaq proliant 2500R with 458752 of
memory. my problem is it keeps telling me out of memory and it only
sees 16 meg. i have type the following line that work with 7.2
linux append mem=exactmap mem=0x9000@0 mem=0x1B80 this gave me 440
with 7.2
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 06:40, William R. Nash wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to reinstall linux on a compaq proliant 2500R with 458752 of
memory. my problem is it keeps telling me out of memory and it only
sees 16 meg. i have type the following line that work with 7.2
linux append mem=exactmap
yes that was the first thing i did. I'm now trying to find information
by look at the bugzilla reports. still nothin
Bill nash
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 15:04, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 06:40, William R. Nash wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to reinstall linux on a compaq proliant
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:59, Todd Slater wrote:
I have a 3 1/2 year old daughter who likes to type in OpenOffice, play
with Tuxpaint and Stickers, and listen to some .wav's I captured from one
of her favorite cartoons. I created an account for her, but never found a
desktop/window manager I
501 - 600 of 2138 matches
Mail list logo
