Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mappen van paalcampings

I think it is mapped OK and in line with the examples [1] in Meerdaalwoud. It exists, so it has its place on the map. Greetz, Gerard Karel Adams schreef op 2019-12-29 15:37: > Na enige aarzeling heb ik, proberenderwijs, de paalcamping Arkadia in Muizen > toegevoegd. Zie >

[OSM-talk-be] JOSM shared boundary of area

Hi, I'm a bit in trouble with shared boundaries of area. I try to sketch the situation. I have a square area and create a rectangle nearby with the same width and half the height, starting at the bottom right, drawing a line to the right, up to half the height, back to the left half way the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Note tells OSM fails

It's the Metro and the MIVB/STIB uses Crainhem as official name in translation for Kraainem. It is located in Brussels, so name rules of Kraainem (NL first), which is in the Flemish Region don't apply. Regards, Gerard Marc Gemis wrote: What about the railway station

[OSM-talk-be] Ourthe = path?

Goedendag, Hier heeft er eentje bij de rivier Ourthe een highway=path toegevoegd. Is zo een dubbel gebruik van waterway en highway tags korrekt? Met vriendelijke groeten, Gerard

Re: [OSM-talk-be] intersection looks very wrong

In Streetview it looks the same. I see this of a typical case of willing to map too much. By that I mean every turn (or shortcut) from one lane to all possible others. The crossing should look in its basic form like a #. Is it needed to represent every lane as separate roads? I don't think so.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

On second view, on the left tree, seems to be a little C1 sign and on the right tree there seems some text on a panel behind the leaves. I believe it is private, unless a visit at the place proves otherwise. Regards, Gerard. mgwebm...@fastmail.fm wrote: Strange. That’s the link that is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

Private driveways are also mapped in the GIS of Vlaanderen. They are part of the mapping of every soil hardening. Don't know the case for Wallonia. The road itself is not in the Atlas, so the claim that it is private seems just. (the crossing path Sentier Miremont is in the Atlas and thus

Re: [OSM-talk-be] E46 = E03 ?

Maybe with the renumbering of the Hm signs, it is extended? Else, ask the mapper, where he got his information, to check if it is a trustworthy source. In the very beginning, there was an E3 and E5 highway, but they got renumbered. I'm surprised, there is still a piece E3 existing. Regards,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

Hi, One remark for the wood-tag: The tag natural=wood is sometimes used for forests, but since natural=wood would refers to unmanaged, natural forests, IMHO it should not be used in Belgium since no more forests are completely natural:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Multilingual names

For the Zoniënwoud, it should be observed that it is located on several cities and regions. Path naming should also follow the rules for the region or city where they are located. - Brussels - Oudergem, Bosvoorde, Ukkel, Woluwe : bilingual Fr- Nl - Wallonia - Waterloo, La Hulpe : Fr - Flanders

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Multilingual names

Ik lees ook : These municipalities should have the official translated names under name:nl =*, name:fr =* and name:de =* (depending on which

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Namen van kerken

dat ze hier systematisch het woord "kerk" gebruiken om aan te duiden dat het om een "parochiekerk" gaat, en dus duidelijk geen kapel of kathedraal. Op 6 februari 2017 om 08:35 schreef Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu <mailto:g...@ghia.eu>>: Goedendag,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Namen van kerken

Goedendag, Iedereen gaat in zijn dorp naar "de kerk" en het gebouw staat alsdusdanig bekend, maar dat is voor mij geen alt name. Voor mij dient er helemaal geen kerk in de naam te staan. Gewoon de patroonheilige is voldoende: dus Heilige Familie of Sint-Bavo. Dat het een kerk is zie je aan

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Planimetrisch punt

Er is ook geen formule nodig. Gewoon omrekenen naar decimale graden is voldoende. (Fout is volgens Wiki maximum 65 cm.) Zie https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europees_Terrestrisch_Referentiesysteem_1989 Mvg Gerard Philippe Casteleyn wrote: Het eerste wat ik op een plan zou zetten is een

Re: [OSM-talk-be] rendering

Ook off-line OSM kaarten en gpx-visualisatie daarop zijn mogelijk met een app, zoals Geopaparazzi. Belgie neemt ongeveer 350MB op je SD. Met je GPS zie je waar je bent op de kaart en of je nog steeds op de omloop bent. Door zoomen heb je veel meer details dan de papieren map. Er zijn knoppen

Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ?

maken moet 3 a 4 keer klikken en telkens veel geduld hebben. Tegen die tijd kan ik al 3 foto's gemaakt hebben en verder wandelen. Dat is voor mij en de honden belangrijker dan de nabewerkingstijd thuis. Maar ieder zijn stijl m Op 2 jul. 2016 17:16 schreef "Gerard Vanderveken" <

Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ?

PS Ook rechtstreeks POI upload naar OSM vanuit het programma! Gerard Vanderveken wrote: Ook heel goed is Geopaparazz <https://github.com/geopaparazzi/geopaparazzi/wiki>i voor surveying onderweg met Android. OSM kaart, gpx log en nota's (tekst, foto, schets of form) op de kaart. Gerard

Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ?

walk=... or cycleway=... on the road though. I'll have a closer look at the TIA sign m. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu> wrote: Hi, Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already thoroughly mapped (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Name of "domeinbos"

Het probleem is ook wel dat het meestal natuurgebieden zijn, waar in de loop van de jaren ook altijd nog wel percelen worden bijgekocht. Soms liggen er ook nog prive-percelen in het gebied. Maar het belangrijkste is toch wel dat het gemapt wordt en er een naam voor bestaat in OSM, ook al is de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Name of "domeinbos"

No, that name is OK and is sometimes also used on the info panels used by ANB. If you fill in domeinbos in the search box, you find several results, eg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166991444 But it has mosttimes a second name, which is the main name, reducing Domeinbos to an always used

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Strange nice map

Originates from this 'wizz kid' . I like the colours and general appearance, but streetnames are not optimal. Regards, Gerard André Pirard wrote: Hi, I have been very surprised to find this

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Wandelknooppunten in Osmand.

Was dat een .map bestand dat je gedownload had voor een offline kaart? Daar hoort ook een .xml konfiguratie / style bestand bij voor de voetwegen. Dit moet in dezelfde folder staan en hernoemd worden naar dezelfde naam van de .map Gerard. Guy Vanvuchelen wrote: Bedankt Marc, zo kan ik thuis

Re: [OSM-talk-be] What is "The Smart Box" ?

This Regards, Gerard Marc Gemis wrote: Hallo, Anyone knows what a "The Smart Box" is ? pictures [1], [2] and how do you map one ? regards [1] https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2015/2015-OSM-Miscellaneous/i-RTTDHJR/0/O/20150922_200213_HDR.jpg [2]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] A12 motorway

Hi, I see thet the ring of Antwerp is incorporated in the relations of E19 (Amsterdam - Paris) and of the A1 (Flemish part of A19). While the E-roads are a conceptual thing, this

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Lanes turns from wich side you start to count?

Hi, It is simple: Look in the direction of the road= arrow (eg SN) Observe lane from left to right. In Belgium on a common street with 2 directions, the left side is in the reverse direction (eg 2 NS) and the right side lanes goes in the direction of the arrow (eg 3 SN). So you have in the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Lanes turns from wich side you start to count?

Oops! turn:lanes:backward=right|through;left should be turn:lanes:backward=right;through|left Gerard Vanderveken wrote: Hi, It is simple: Look in the direction of the road= arrow (eg SN) Observe lane from left to right. In Belgium on a common street with 2 directions, the left side

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Lanes turns from wich side you start to count?

further: turn:lanes:backward=right;through|left Which must you put first is this strictly? turn:lanes:backward=the direction change;continue|left or turn:lanes:backward=continue;the direction change|left Gerard Vanderveken schreef op 30/11/2014 om 13:24: Oops! turn:lanes:backward=right

Re: [OSM-talk-be] mountainbikeroutes: lcn of rcn

Die van het Dijleland zijn allemaal lussen, gemarkeerd met gekleurde pijlen. http://www.toerismevlaamsbrabant.be/fietsen/fietsproducten/mountainbikenetwerk-dijleland/index.jsp De lussen delen hier en daar wel een segment of wegkruising, zodat je onderweg van de ene lus naar de andere kan hoppen.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 1 or 2 lanes ?

Hi, From the same lane page on the Wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes: If the lane is also regulary opened with heavy traffic (spitsstrook http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitsstrook) then it should be counted (lanes=2), if it is only used for emergencies it is a shoulder and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New user OsmAnd_Pieter

Don't know how the app works, but I assume they have a user login at OSM. Maybe we need to contact the app-builder and ask that they add something in their app, that warns the user of messages in its inbox. Or even allow him to read and write these messages. Regards, Gerard. Jo wrote: We

Re: [OSM-talk-be] osm.be

Looking good! The language selector doesn't work when not at home page. Replace a href=nlNL/a / a href=frFR/a with a href=/nlNL/a / a href=/frFR/a However additional script may be needed to stay on eg the blog and not to be redirected to home. Regards, Gerard. Ben Abelshausen wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Brussels

The only problem is how to name it. The three territories are called: Flemish Community, Communauté flamande, Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Flämische Gemeinschaft French Community, Communauté française, Franse Gemeenschap, Französische Gemeinschaft German-speaking Community, Communauté germanophone,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] driving way

Not clear what exact is the situation and what the role of which street is. -1- I suppose that at the blocked entrance at the south side of the street, there wil be some gate or narrowing, what will be indicated with eg sign C1 and F19. I suggest you take there a little segment of 5 to 20 m

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GPX Track layer in JOSM

Why to use this? It is already present in the predefined backgrounds http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Preferences/Imagery. Setup: edit - preferences- wms/tms - the one before public transportation - activate - ok Use: imagery - openstreetmap gps traces Regards, Gerard. Glenn Plas

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wandelnetwerk zuid-dijleland, bedankt Jo

Jo, Bedankt om deze diskussie, net als zoveel andere maar weer eens in de kiem te smoren, door iedereen voor voldongen feiten te zetten. . Door je massa-edit met je scripts slaag je er telkens weer in gebruikers te ontmoedigen, die hun werk zien verloren gaan. Hiermee hou je ook alle

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wandelnetwerk zuid-dijleland

Het is beter de Wiki aan te passen. Nu er overal wandelroutes opduiken is er het probleem om op de kaart te kunnen zien tot welk netwerk een segment behoort. http://hiking.lonvia.de/en/?zoom=13lat=50.78801lon=4.58032 http://hiking.lonvia.de/en/?zoom=14lat=50.79127lon=4.13863 Ook in de online

Re: [OSM-talk-be] newbie

Als ik naar de geschiedenis van de weg kijk http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23644375/history vraag ik me af, waarom er iets aan veranderd moest worden aan versie 5 want in versie 4 staat reeds als opmerking Comment: veldweg is nu verhard in beton + verbinding van tertiary roads Dus versie

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wandelnetwerk zuid-dijleland

De twee zijn/waren synoniemen, maar eigenlijk vind ik foot meer aangewezen. Maar foot lijkt nu wat meer deprecated te zijn in de Wiki, zodat hiking de terechte keuze is. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Tags Misschien moet okok de belgische Wiki worden aangepast

Re: [OSM-talk-be] newbie

, johan Op 21 augustus 2012 12:19 schreef Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g...@ghia.eu het volgende: Als ik naar de geschiedenis van de weg kijk http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23644375/history vraag ik me af, waarom er iets aan veranderd moest worden aan versie 5

Re: [OSM-talk-be] newbie

? dank u, johan Op 21 augustus 2012 12:19 schreef Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g...@ghia.eu het volgende: Als ik naar de geschiedenis van de weg kijk http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23644375/history

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wandelnetwerk zuid-dijleland

+1 De voorloopnul is niet nodig, dus ZD 1-34 Gewoon het nummer zoals aangeduid op de bordjes. Bij wandelnetwerken worden meestal tot 3 cijfers gebruikt en dan is 001 ook weer zwaar overdreven. België en Nederland zijn de enigen die de note-tag propageren, anderen gebruiken gewoon de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Just subsribed to OSM-be

See beginners guide for overview of GPS devices. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1.1 Mind that the 'Snap to road' or 'Lock on road' option can be switched OFF!!! Success! Gerard Julien Minet wrote: Hi all, I know OSM for a long time but so far I could not contribute to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Using the tag place=neighbourhood

Hi, I woukld not change it place=hamlet. fits fine for Mariakerke http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features#Plaats_.28place.29 Hamlets typically do have a church and form a separate community. suburbs are districts in cities, while neighbourhoods are more a group of rural isolated

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Chantiers werken in Bxl

Intended use of highway=construction is when a new road is constructed on a place where no road was before. Tagging like this, without changing the existing tags highway=primary ref=R32 construction=minor constriction:start=2012-08-01 construction:end=2012-09-30 has the advantage that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] free cycle journey planner

Hi, You can use http://www.openrouteservice.org/ It can make bicycle routes with several options to suit your needs (shortest, mtb, race, safe, on cycleways). Regards, Gerard. Nicolas Pettiaux wrote: Hello, There has been some discussion recently about cycleways on the list. I have

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Tagging Questions

Sander Deryckere wrote: Op 17 april 2012 12:40 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com het volgende: Hi all, I have a few tagging questions * How do I tag a 'Feestzaal/Sale de fête' that is part of a pub/restaurant ? usually it has a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapping Taverne, Cafe, etc.

amenity=tavern is also possible or amenity=restaurant with type=tavern But I would like to have it added on the list of official amenity tags as it is indeed a separate type.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tavern Regards, Gerard. Sander Deryckere wrote: I tag a taverne as amenity=cafe, since

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk-fr] StreetView?

People tend to judge the book by the cover and not by the content. In this respect OSM is no match to StreetView. So, we should not try to profilate us against it. It will only cause disbelief and leaves OSM with a stamp of inferiority, because there is not the bling bling of StreetView.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppuntennetwerken, hun complexiteit en egrijpelijke misverstanden eromheen

Ik vind het hele gedoe met die tentakels een zeer hoog absurdistan gehalte hebben. Een route is simpelweg een aaneenschakeling van wegen tussen 2 punten: beginpunt A en eindpunt B. Een speciaal geval is wanneer A en B hetzelfde punt zijn, dan heb je een omloop. Dat het trajekt van A naar B

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk-fr] StreetView?

Don't rely on the streetnames and housenumbers indicated by Google. I was only in my second street and detected a totally wrong street name. The housenumbers were as indicated approximative and way off. The viewpoints of Google are with distances of 20 m plus and so many signs and even

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some maxspeed mapping questions

Ben Laenen wrote: On Friday 11 November 2011 09:50:16 Gerard Vanderveken wrote: Ben Laenen wrote: This is an unsolved question... Some may use directions like N/E/S/W for north/east/south/west. But then you also need to be able to attach the node to the proper way (bridges and dual

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Some maxspeed mapping questions

Jo wrote: While starting to change a mini_roundabout which wasn't actually a mini_roundabout, I went a little overboard and this is the result: It is a 'verhoogd kruispunt', so I tagged all the elevated ways with: traffic_calming=table And the places where the bumps are 'felt' with:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New village boundaries?

Altough it is a geographical location, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.7876lon=4.5993zoom=13layers=M I think it is some commercial act from a wine maker (see monteberg.be) As said: ignore, unless you get confirmation of the town Heuvelland that there is a new hamlet. Regards, Gerard.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Navteq de lijn en google maps!

Dat is niet zeker. Alhoewel gratis, komen de OSM-gegevens ook met een licentie en bijhorende rechten en plichten, welke voor Google misschien wel even hinderlijk zijn als het 'njet' of de voorwaarden van Navteq. mvg Gerard. Ben Abelshausen wrote: Ok dus als hun routes in OSM zaten had

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Regional walking networks

Ben Laenen wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:21:47 Jo wrote: Maybe the fact that this discussion seems to recur every so often is an indicator that something is not logical about it. Since these routes ultimately have to be entered by people and these people make a choice, which is not

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Regional walking networks

Ben Laenen wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:49:00 Gerard Vanderveken wrote: We want to tag for the people and for usabillity. The current reasoning is flawed. -The route between 2 points in a network has no name, so we do not tag a name in OSM. Congratulations. Now if only we

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Regional walking networks

Ben Laenen wrote: On Monday 10 October 2011 21:19:56 Marc Gemis wrote: I use both openwandelkaart and Lonvia to check my edits. Recently, I noticed that some walking networks are rendered differently in Lonvia. The routes have a rectangle with 2 characters (ZD - Zuid-Dijleland and KH -

Re: [OSM-talk-be] ODBL

Renaud MICHEL wrote: Hello On dimanche 25 septembre 2011 at 14:23, Jo wrote : I'm sending the following message to everybody who hasn't decided yet. Up to now I sent it to all contributors who still have 1-150 elements in the database in Belgium. From those I managed to have 8 extra people

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bing Updated

at 11:18, Gerard Vanderveken wrote : Bing updated the background imagery for JOSM and Potlatch to spring 2011. I've also the impression the resolution is now on par with bing.com/maps. Now you can map also very recent buildings and other objects. I hope they don't stop here, as it seems

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Difference between OSM and BING background

This seems to be solved by the recent Bing update. Regards, Gerard. Gerard Vanderveken wrote: Hi, The difference shows in PotLatch 2. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.176782lon=4.445492zoom=18layers=M In Potlatch the alignment with Yahoo is still correct. For other areas (Loonbeek

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Duration for changes to appear on all zoom levels?

Normally 5 to 30 minutes later, it should be present in Mapnik after a first request to view. Osmarender takes in general what longer. At first glance, I don't see any differences (pitches, track and building are present). Maybe it is your browsers' cache that make the trouble. Try once to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Yippee! JOSM is the best! :-)

Maybe you need a CSS rule for relation[boundary]? Gerard. Jo wrote: Hi Julien, I'm glad you find my post useful. Did you manage to show the bus stops the way that you like? If not, if you point me to one of your bus stops, I'll try and see what I can do. For myself, I'll probably be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Yippee! JOSM is the best! :-)

JOSM has no specific symbols for nodes that are a node in a cycle route network. You can see such nodes are highlighted in grey, because it has attributes, but that is all. The proposed 'change' makes that the cycle node numbers are displayed in JOSM (in the way a cityname is displayed), which

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Yippee! JOSM is the best! :-)

/browse/changeset/8220638 Maybe can we add some stylesheets to JOSM using the same way as Jo ? Julien 2011/9/6 Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g...@ghia.eu JOSM has no specific symbols for nodes that are a node in a cycle route network. You can see such nodes are highlighted

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppuntennetwerk/Cycle node network

It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree. But I assume you mean ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes' On top of that, I find it handy when the route realations have a name, so it is easy to see which are the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppuntennetwerk/Cycle node network

Ben Laenen wrote: On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:12:05 Gerard Vanderveken wrote: It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree. But I assume you mean ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes' On top of that, I find

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Lang usages and modifications in BXL

Agreed on 'first come, first set'. But one could make an exception for things that by their nature have a French or Flemish character, eg schools or institutions that are dependent on one of the Communities or Regions, maybe also associations or companies that have only signs in one language,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Verkeerstuin

There is a 'verkeerspark' in the 'proviciaal domein' of Kessel-Lo also. A foto for people to know what we are talking about: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vlaamsbrabant/3228819350/ Didn't check yet how it is mapped mvg Gerard wannes wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Andre Engels

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Verkeerstuin

'verkeerspark' or whatever is on the signs. (I would not bother with traffic signs, 'fun street names' and turn restrictions) Regards, Gerard Gerard Vanderveken wrote: There is a 'verkeerspark' in the 'proviciaal domein' of Kessel-Lo also. A foto for people to know what we are talking about

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Difference between OSM and BING background

Hi, The difference shows in PotLatch 2. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.176782lon=4.445492zoom=18layers=M In Potlatch the alignment with Yahoo is still correct. For other areas (Loonbeek) the alignment witth Bing is still correct. Probably Bing updated its images for some part of the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Knooppuntennetwerken (Regional walking networks)

Not yet tested, but visuals looking good. A few problems remarked: trkseg /trkseg trkseg /trkseg These are empty tracksegments, probably from ways that were not loaded in JOSM at the time of export. (Verification or ad-hoc loading possible?) trk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Knooppuntennetwerken (Regional walking networks)

double nodes from start and end of these ways) Regards, Gerard. Jo wrote: That doesn't look too complicated, I'll look into it, tomorrow. Jo 2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g...@ghia.eu As a minimum you require an output file dijleland.gpx like this example ?xml

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Knooppuntennetwerken (Regional walking networks)

provide me with a detailed example of what data in the osm file, needs to become which information in the gpx, I might try to program this in Python. It's possible to add python scripts to JOSM. Jo (Polyglot) 2011/8/2 Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g...@ghia.eu It is not an obligation

[OSM-talk-be] Problems with JOSM's unwanted behaviour.

Hi, (Warning: long and difficult subject matter ahead! :-) ) I love to work with JOSM, but I have two problems with JOSM. - When you start drawing a way somewhere in a node, JOSM always assumes you want to continue some way already present. This is very annoying and unproductive, because

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Problems with JOSM's unwanted behaviour.

Renaud MICHEL wrote: On lundi 11 juillet 2011 at 12:22, Gerard Vanderveken wrote : - When you start drawing a way somewhere in a node, JOSM always assumes you want to continue some way already present. This is very annoying and unproductive, because this is nearly always not what you

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Problems with JOSM's unwanted behaviour.

Lennard wrote: In the example (in the ticket) that node is also the endpoint of *another* way, and it does do a contination of *that*. However, it's made out to appear that selecting a non-endpoint node of a way and then drawing from that will produce a continuation. Not so. No, you

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weide

Meadow is de algemene term voor grasland. Dit kan zowel een weide, hooiland, als een natuurlijk, wild stuk grasgebied zijn. Pasture is specifiek een weide, dus een omheind grasveld waar dieren op grazen. Op veel plaatsen is ook de weide en het hooiland mee ingemapt met de velden onder het

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fixing administrative borders

Benoit Leseul wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:16, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote: ... My main concern is to somehow discern the border of the German language area (after all, it's the only border not at level 4). I don't know if it's realistic, but maybe the German

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Workshop Trage Wegen

I think it is a good idea to name the unnamed paths and tracks to its Voetweg and Buurtweg name from the Atlas if these roads exists there. Many muncipalities are rediscovering, revaluating and inventarising these old and sometimes almost forgotten and often neglected roads. Many times these

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fixing administrative borders

Benoit Leseul wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 20:27, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote: Benoit Leseul wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:18, Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Comunities are made up of people, not of area. So putting communitie-borders on the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] help needed with tagging - sports clubs

Actually, it is leisure = fishing eg http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/89344008 altough rendering seems only be done when it is a single node http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fishing Regards, Gerard. Jo wrote: This is how I tagged a football club's terrains:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Cell Phones Antennas

) with nearest streets ? or another standard procedure ? Regards, Linusable Le 22/04/11 16:33, Pol a écrit : I deleted them this morning and as long as the situation is not clear. -φol d.- On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:22, Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu mailto:g

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

Hi and Welcome! I assume you use the Atlas for looking up 'trage wegen' (slow roads) Then it is as said in full Voetweg (sentier) or Buurtweg (chemin) followed by a number eg Voetweg 23 Example of Sint-Agatha-Rode (and area around)

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

Hi, Tags are good. Except segregated = no is only to be used with footway and cycleway. So, delete this tag. The name in full, name = Buurtweg 23 I don't know where you get this BW23 from. It is not indicated as such in the atlas: http://gis1.provant.be/Geoloketten/geoloket.jsp?geoloketid=55

Re: [OSM-talk-be] etymology of street names

I would put it in the description tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description eg name = Henri Farmanstraat description = Luchthavenpionier, 1874-1958 If existant, you could add an Wikipedia link wikipedia = en:Henri_Farman Most people and locations have a page on a website (to be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] outer airport????

Hij staat in de lijst van verdwenen luchthavens (pos 80) http://www.bamfbamrs.be/Dillien/OO-AERODROMES DISPARUS.doc mvg Gerard Karel Adams wrote: Op 16/02/2011 14:42, Luc Van den Troost schreef: Volgens OSM ligt hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.854451lon=3.985033zoom=18layers=M

Re: [OSM-talk-be] University of Delaware

Karel, Ik kan je daar in helemaal bijtreden. Nu met de Bing sattelietbeelden is het mogelijk om nog een boel straten, wegen en paden toe te voegen. Ook nog een aantal reeds gemapte straten kunnen beter worden uitgelijnd. Tip: Om straten zonder naam te vinden is er de handige validatie

Re: [OSM-talk-be] och, een speeltje uit de vrije software

Marc, Je bent wel zeer hardleers. Je bent reeds herhaaldelijk gewaarschuwd om deze data niet meer voor te stellen, omdat ze NIET kompatibel is met de OSM licentie en dus ook niet mogen gebruikt worden binnen OSM. http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-be@openstreetmap.org/msg00557.html (en

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bingify Belgium

Hi all, I'm mostly adding new paths and tracks around Huldenberg with JOSM, using Bing (and previously Yahoo) to correct ways and adding landmark buildings in connection of the new material. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.7876lon=4.5993zoom=13layers=M Gerard. Jo wrote: I'm working

Re: [OSM-talk-be] trunk crossroads and cyclerouting

Hi, I think the road is wrong classified. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8288162 It should be residential and part of the Celestijnenlaan and not trunk_link http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/72912809 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/3877191 Because that is what it is there:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] bing!

I have used it also with JOSM and it works great. Much more detail then with Yahoo. Also more recent images. Don't know the date but seems 3 - 4 years ago. Alignment seems very good at Huldenberg Vlaams-Brabant (saw some complaints for the alignment at high zooms). Anyway, a great

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Simpele vragen van simpele mapper

Ik apprecieer jullie werk ook ten zeerste! Als iemand een opmerking maakt , kan je dat op twee manieren opvatten: - een afkeuring van je inpanningen. - een mogelijkheid om je te helpen je werk te verbeteren. Laat mij duidelijk zijn: het eerste is nooit mijn bedoeling en het tweede is mijn

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Simpele vraag van simpele mapper

Ik weet niet wat je precies gedaan hebt, maar eerst straten wissen en ze dan opnieuw aanmaken lijkt mij niet de juiste methode. Het best is steeds verder te werken op de bestaande gegevens en deze bij te werken. mvg Gerard Karel Adams wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Doneerde ons kadaster de gebouwen aan TeleAtlas??

Het geheel is natuurlijk een werk van lange adem. Je kan niet zo maar even de laatste satteliet foto nemen en 5 minuutjes later alle bouwsels van Europa op de site staan hebben. Ik denk niet dat het van het kadaster komt, want daarvoor staan er teveel onvergunde zaken op. Eigen werk dus.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Busroutes

in that respect as they are given/named by the public and exists for a very long time.) Ben Laenen wrote: Gerard Vanderveken wrote: I tend to consider them as copyrighted material, and thus forbidden to be used at all with OSM There's no copyright on factual data. The reason why we cannot

[OSM-talk-be] Busroutes

I think you are making it all too complicated. For most bus routes only 1 relation is sufficient. There is no reason for doubling all routes by default. Also making relations members of other relations is a mistake. The data of OSM is flat and not layered. See also Members of a route: