I've gone and updated the imagery bounds and bboxes for both Potlatch 2 and
JOSM for the North American imagery sources. JOSM should now only suggest a
source if it actually covers the area.
Potlatch 2 will still suggest sources even if they don't cover the area
because potlatch 2 only supports
to revert some subsequent changesets first.
Paul Norman
For the DWG
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
.
The Data Working Group can be contacted at d...@osmfoundation.org.
[1]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
[2]:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_ac
count
[3]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
Paul Norman
For the Data
I saw this mentioned on IRC but I haven't seen it here, so I figured I'd
point out cquest's live edit viewer at:
http://osm7.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/live/
It zooms in and shows you various edits and where people are editing
worldwide. It unfortunately doesn't show you geometry.
OSMZmiany is
.
This does not mean that the license has changed. I am not in a position to
comment on any other tasks that need to be completed before a switch to
ODbL.
Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
Non-commercial only licenses discriminate against fields of endeavor and are
definitely not open. See 6 of http://opensource.org/docs/osd or 8 of
http://opendefinition.org/okd/. No derivative licenses are also not open -
you can't modify the data.
Another explanation is
From: Stephan Knauss [mailto:o...@stephans-server.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] DWG post-redaction bot cleanup
Hello Norman,
On 26.08.2012 03:49, Paul Norman wrote:
The redactions are being done from
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pnorman%20redaction%20revert
can you give a rough
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:01 AM
To: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] DWG post-redaction bot cleanup
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The Data Working Group is beginning to revert some copypaste
I see the problem as being the importing of everything as being the problem,
not the geometric model :)
From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:49 PM
To: 'Pierre Béland'; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec import issues
Bonjour
uploading
frequently is always a good idea.
Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
You're supposed to copy and paste the URL from the table or click on the
link, not copy the link. I'll see if I can clarify that in the
documentation.
From: Matthew Buchanan [mailto:matthew.ian.bucha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:01 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk-ca
It's good to see some progress made on cleaning these up.
Just be clear, are you proposing a new import at this time?
From: Nathan Mixter [mailto:srmix...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 2:45 PM
To: talk-us; imports
Subject: [Talk-us] Kern County progress
I have begun
the accuracy.
On Aug 20, 2012 6:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
It's good to see some progress made on cleaning these up.
Just be clear, are you proposing a new import at this time?
From: Nathan Mixter [mailto:srmix...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 2:45 PM
After some technical and legal work, I now have a number of imagery layers
hosted on a rented server.
These layers cover from Vancouver to Hope in 20cm or better and Lions Bay to
Pemberton as 40cm or better. 10cm imagery is available for Vancouver,
Richmond, Ladner, West Delta, the North Shore,
...@att.net wrote:
On 8/13/2012 11:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
It’s all CC BY-SA right now so you’d be okay now, but I think it’d be a
problem in the future under both CC BY-SA and ODbL if you were mix the
data in this way.
I'd think this is not actually importing any information directly from
It’s all CC BY-SA right now so you’d be okay now, but I think it’d be a problem
in the future under both CC BY-SA and ODbL if you were mix the data in this way.
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 7:09 PM
To: Mike N
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
From: Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Please, consider that more people want to
mark even their future ODBl OSM contributions as CC-BY-SA compatible
Also since we are on the topic, I think that many people who are in the
USA cannot legally
I happened to notice the coastline for an entire island in South Sulawesi,
Indonesia is missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-6.1219lon=120.4563zoom=14layers=M
There also seem to be a lot of primary roads and few lower classifications.
This actually may not be redaction related.
I'm
Whoops - looks like I had disabled the cron job. Files should start
uploading at about 2-3 AM UTC.
-Original Message-
From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:40 PM
To: talk-us
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Discardable TIGER tags
I was unaware of the TLID bug and the fact that TIGER has changed their
data model although I kind of wondered about this because I didn't see a
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Disgardable NHN and NRN tags
I think the ways tagged with sub_sea would need to be deleted, not
just the tag itself. These tend to be hydrological topology connectors
under lakes
Now that the redaction bot has finished running, I want to propose what
should be a simple uncontroversial mechanical edit (hah).
I propose cleaning up two types of empty relations that are not members of
other relations.
- Those with no members and no tags
- Those with no members and
From: Werner Hoch [mailto:werner...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 6:33 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical import: Empty relations 1
Am Sonntag, den 29.07.2012, 02:06 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman:
Now that the redaction bot has
From: Mike N [mailto:nice...@att.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical import: Empty relations 1
On 7/29/2012 5:06 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
- Those with no members and no tags
- Those with no members and type=multipolygon as the only tag
Relations removed will be limited
This is based on
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-July/008830.html, a
recent talk-us@ discussion about TIGER tags. Parts of this message are a
copy/paste from there.
Some people may not even be aware of this but JOSM silently discards the
created_by tag if it exists on any
From: Adam Dunn [mailto:dunna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 5:57 PM
To: Steve Singer
Cc: Paul Norman; Toby Murray; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Disgardable NHN and NRN tags
I'd keep the accuracy:meters around. I've used that for other things
(mainly
I happened to be looking at Kern County and noticed two problems with the
imports that seem to be systemic over the area.
The first is classification of empty areas as landuse=residential (e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/540695
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53993995)
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction finished already?
Jan Kučera wrote:
Ok so are imports allowed again?
Back in April I made this request:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk@openstreetmap.org/msg42372.html
and I'd suggest that it
From: Rob Myers [mailto:r...@robmyers.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Some questions about using ODbL Produced
Work
BY-SA doesn't cover databases though (any potential changes in 4.0
notwithstanding).
It's important to note that this is only true where databases (like OSM) are
not
though I know when my runs finish.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
To: 'osm-talk'
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
generated with the coastcheck program[1] from
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are generated
with the coastcheck program[1] from my jxapi database starting at 5 AM
pacific time. They take 3-4 hours to generate and upload, depending on my
internet speed at the time.
The completed files are uploaded to
From: andrzej zaborowski [mailto:balr...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OT - Unusual Bing imagery
On 24 July 2012 03:48, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2012-07-23 16:02, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
The area in the screenshot seems to have a higher resolution than
From: Kevin Kenny [mailto:kken...@nycap.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 5:45 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?
On 07/22/2012 09:33 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
The mappings on the wiki are not only incomplete
From: Kevin Kenny [mailto:kken...@nycap.rr.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?
A few months ago, I tried to get started on trying to resume the NHD
import in my area - and some of the places where I hike. I'm trying to
check results with both P2 and JOSM,
From: James Umbanhowar [mailto:jumba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 6:43 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 18:33 -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
The main weakness with NHD data that I find
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 2:30 PM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Some questions about using ODbL Produced
Work maps in Wikipedia
Hi,
On 21.07.2012 21:33, Paul Norman wrote:
CC 4.0 licenses explicitly
From: David E. Nelson [mailto:denelso...@yahoo.ca]
Subject: [Talk-ca] CanVec imports allowed again?
Now that the redaction bot has apparently finished its sweep of Canada,
is it safe for CanVec imports to be resumed? I want to try my hand at
importing a few tiles around where I live.
The
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: Re: Post bot cleanup
And this time to the list... (cures you, lack of reply-to!)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:16 AM, the Old Topo Depot
oldto...@novacell.com wrote:
Toby's post yesterday using the modified live
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: [Talk-ca] redaction bot cbbboming soon!
Dear All,
The redaction bot is now in North America. You can watch the progress
here:
http://harrywood.dev.openstreetmap.org/license-change/botprocessing.php
Each area starts from the
The logs (linked from that square) say which way it was. It looks like the
maritime boundary was large enough that two instances of the bot tried to
delete it at the same time
From: Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:43 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Talk-CA
I actually have some experience in this area, but keep in mind that the
requirements may vary significantly by country.
Some form of insurance is likely to be required by some organizations. I
know the group bike rides I used to go on had insurance. On the other hand,
if all you're using their
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 1:47 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Licence redaction ready to begin
Test runs have shown that the bot is functioning as we want it to, but
we will of course be monitoring its progress. We are currently expecting
it
I have been working on a conversion for NHD data to .osm and decided it's
time to post something.
A few warnings
- The conversion is not yet done. I estimate that the FCode conversions are
about 90% done
- This is designed to work on the pre-staged subregion files which are
FileGDB or
From: Pekka Sarkola [mailto:pekka.sark...@gispo.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 9:03 AM
To: OSM - talk-fi; legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] MoU between OSM and NLSF
Dear Friends,
I have prepared with National Land Survey of Finland Memorandum of
Understanding
-Original Message-
From: Fabian Rodriguez [mailto:magic...@member.fsf.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 4:16 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Tr : [OSGeo-qc] Données ouvertes : gouvernement
du Québec...
On 06/30/2012 03:51 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
You're asking two separate questions, one is on creating a PDF map, the
other is a style sheet that shows something other than what osm.xml (the
standard style on osm.org) does.
I wrote mapbook (https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook) which will create a PDF
using Mapnik's default AGG renderer. It
-Original Message-
From: webmas...@the506.com [mailto:webmas...@the506.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:51 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Proposed import: Service New Brunswick address data
Hello...long time reader, first time poster. You may know me as
From: Kate Chapman [mailto:k...@maploser.com]
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Triggering ShareAlike in Government
Hi All,
I have a question about what would trigger the ShareAlike in the context
of government. Let's say for example a National Mapping Agency takes the
OpenStreetMap road data
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Triggering ShareAlike in Government
Hi,
The interesting question is, and I don't know if Paul intended to hint
at that with his FOI reference: What happens if the information is
leaked, e.g. if the ME has to
From: maning sambale [mailto:emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:38 PM
To: jaa...@helleranta.com
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?
I don't think this is the case because when I am using JOSM, the old
hires imagery is
From: Phil! Gold [mailto:phi...@pobox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings
* William Morris wboyk...@geosprocket.com [2012-06-01 12:53 -0400]:
is orthogonalization worthwhile in this case?
I'm not sure it is. I tried using JOSM's orthogonalization tool on a
number of buildings
I have a few specific comments, and some more general ones
From: William Morris [mailto:wboyk...@geosprocket.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings
Howdy Folks,
Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred
buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification. In
.
2012/5/30 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
Could you post the code used to generate the changesets?
Ich may not. Some parts of it are not open source. I think of clean
rewrite.
The logic that you have created is what I'm interested in.
That would be the
easiest way for some
Could you post the code used to generate the changesets? That would be the
easiest way for some of us to review your proposed changes. It wouldn’t remove
the need to explain it to non-programmers, but it would be much easier for some
of us if we could look at the code.
That being said, a
Select the nodes then use search within selection - or search for selected
source=something
From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 9:27 AM
To: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Selecting validation warnings in JOSM
Is there a way to
The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page with the details of the
proposed upload, as well as contact info (i.e. main account).
Please provide documentation on all the points in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy#Document
From: Worst Fixer
/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
From: Worst Fixer [mailto:worstfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:31 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: building=levels=N
Hello.
2012/5/20 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page
From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:emac...@gmail.com]
Seattle importer, please read!)
Getting back to the current TIGER expansion, I decided it would be a
mistake to try a large scale import without having some way of ensuring
that the uploads were being done correctly, and so I've been working
-Original Message-
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Address placement (was: Fresno castradal imports)
Moving this to a new thread because there is no address data in the
I've been looking at the NHD data from the USGS site and have noticed a few
recent changes from how they were described on the wiki.
1. The viewer has changed. http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/nhd.html
will bring up a map you can use to download NHD data. This viewer does not
work in Chrome
[1] http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution
On 03/05/2012 01:17, Paul Norman wrote:
The BC government has released data under the Open Government License
for Government of BC Information[1] which is based
See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.html
for the full discussion around the removal
In summary:
- The Fresno import has a number of issues
- No one is opposed to removal if there are no easier options for cleaning
up the data
- No one has proposed an easier
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.htm
l for the full discussion around the removal
From: Nathan Mills [mailto:nat...@nwacg.net]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
On 5/4/2012 4:21 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
To the contrary, this whole conversation started because we received
multiple complaints about this area from mappers who wanted to create
data in this area
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
On May 4, 2012 5:41 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
...and we need to examine what our existing user tools and server
processing
and storage resources are and how they can
From: Alan Mintz [mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:06 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org; impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
At 2012-05-04 01:37, Paul Norman wrote:
See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us
Minutely diffs are currently running from
http://planet.osm.org/redaction-period/
You should read the caution first before consuming.
From what I saw the imports were fairly clean. Some large objects, but
that's to be expected with the large lakes in the region you were working
in. If you're
The BC government has released data under the Open Government License for
Government of BC Information[1] which is based on the same license used for
OS OpenData information[2]. OS OpenData can be used in OSM[3]
The OGL BC is, broadly speaking, an attribution only license that makes
allowances
From: Nathan Edgars II [mailto:nerou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:24 AM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; OpenStreetMap talk-us
list
Subject: [Talk-us] Waterway directionality in drainage canals
It's the standard to draw a waterway in the direction of flow.
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
wrote:
I happened across an import
If I saw one of these locally I would verify that it corresponds to nothing
on the ground and then delete it.
-Original Message-
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:28 PM
To: Open Street Map mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing
I happened across an import of Fresno castradal data from mid-2010 in the
Fresno area. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.77lon=-119.81zoom=15 is
the general area but I haven't fully explored the extents. For a view of the
data, see http://maps.paulnorman.ca/imports/review/fresno.png
Based on
2. There is not a consensus among the community that CanVec data can be
imported without verifying the data for internal consistency and where
possible against imagery.
If no one disagrees with the fact there is not a consensus that importing
CanVec without minimal verification is acceptable
From: Bégin, Daniel [mailto:daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca]
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Canadian imports: good or bad?
Steve, Paul,
I was on the impression that the consensus was more about using Canvec
where it is the best available source and, when it is not, the data
could be imported, but
Whoops - forgot to include talk-ca@ in this
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:50 PM
To: 'Toby Murray'; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] City boundaries on the Canada/US border
I started working my way across
, March 30, 2012 7:51 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] City boundaries on the Canada/US border
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Alexander Roalter
alexan...@roalter.it wrote:
Am 30.03.2012 11:17, schrieb Paul Norman:
There are a significant number of cities in BC
imported. Since they haven't responded, I'm asking the community for them.
What should be done with this data? It could be reverted or left. The data
does seem an improvement on the PGS that was there before, but I'm not a
local so I don't have any strong opinion.
Paul Norman
For the DWG
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] handheld gps unit
What about a camera with built-in GPS? That way you can make photo
documentation of the progress at each site with a timestamp and
geostamp[1]. Many cameras also record audio, so you
Websites normally use TMS for backgrounds, not WMS. WMS is generally a lot
slower than TMS. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WMS might help with
finding a WMS server for OSM data. To make your own WMS server you could
either use a program that turns tiles to WMS or renders directly to WMS.
From: Ian Bruseker [mailto:ian.bruse...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:31 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Canadian imports: good or bad?
On 2012-04-15, at 6:37 PM, Steve Singer st...@ssinger.info wrote:
I also feel that not of all data sources are
From: Alan Mintz [mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:18 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit: Empty Relations
Through editor errors or other mistakes there are a number of relations
in OSM which have no members. I propose a mechanical edit to delete
these where they are not members of some
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canadian imports: good or bad?
Dear All,
Let's talk about it again. How do we feel about the bulk copying of
information from a permitted source into OpenStreetMap in Canada?
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that we
From: Andrew Allison [mailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:55 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] coastline or water polygon
Hello:
I'm removing red dots on the north coast of Nova Scotia at the
moment with canvec data. The canvec data
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change
Hi,
On 04/13/2012 08:14 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I downloaded all natural=coastline ways from my jxapi. Then I split
the world into 4 parts to make them small enough
Through editor errors or other mistakes there are a number of relations in
OSM which have no members. I propose a mechanical edit to delete these where
they are not members of some other way. My proposed procedure, documented at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/pnorman_imports
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change
Hi,
On 04/13/12 11:00, Paul Norman wrote:
This technique works well for smaller areas, but when I tried running
the license check plugin on a 5 GB .osm file
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: [Talk-ca] upcoming Canadian press coverage and your local group
Dear all,
I expect that OSM will be getting some press coverage in the Canadian
media in the near future. This is a wonderful opportunity to launch
your
I'd suggest a digital camera with an intervalometer to capture images every
few seconds. Canon PowerShots with CHDK work for this.
The mounts look useful but you can get similar mounts separately (e.g.
http://delkin.com/c-147099-mounts-mini-mount.html)
From: Colin Smale
robust once the base is properly build.
Any other suggestions regarding the idea are welcome!
--
Nikhil
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The road signs, max speeds and bus stops don't take long to tag. Take
the bus stop in IMG_3429.JPG as an example
will be
automatically added to map with respective tags after synchronizing with
gps tracks.
I would request if anyone has such images/videos along with gpx file to
share here as these will be helpful while developing the plugin.
--
Nikhil Upadhye
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Paul Norman
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:mve...@gmail.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] importing bus stops
Hi,
Anyone here with experience importing bus stops? Any particular
considerations?
To make it more concrete, I have permission to import all UTA stops.
They come in a shapefile similar to the one
From: Ruogu Ding [mailto:ruogu.d...@kaust.edu.sa]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Download all OSM GPS traces
Hi,
I find a planet.gpx is being offered but with only GPS points. I
understand that this is helpful, and appreciate the efforts in
generating this file. However, many people (like me) need
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Terentiev [mailto:djterent...@yandex.ru]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:16 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Detecting unwanted edits and vandalism
Adam,
Very often newbie to OSM start their contribution with moving object
LA area on BadMap: http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=10
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=10lat=34lon=-118layers=00B0
lat=34lon=-118layers=00B0
From: Charlotte Wolter [mailto:techl...@techlady.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:34 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] Link to BadMap?
From: Rob Myers [mailto:r...@robmyers.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 10:08 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)
On 04/04/2012 01:33 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view,
Since no one has objected (or commented) I'll go ahead with this if I can
get it in before the rebuild starts.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 12:04 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Proposed
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] server migration update / license change
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de wrote:
Thanks a lot for the Update, Richard. It is much appreciated that the
information flow works.
I have a
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] server migration update / license change
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
If the tiles are not regenerated then they will contain elements that
are licensed as cc by-sa only.
Old
of their locations
-Original Message-
From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:01 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Hi Paul,
do you plan another update?
Regards
Thomas
Paul Norman wrote
I have completed another
701 - 800 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
